"The Court's belief in the veracity of Wright's testimony dwindled while the trial progressed, as evidence of her inconsistent and questionable conduct was revealed piece by piece.... She lied about her advanced degrees. She signed e-mails as Dr. Wright when she is not a doctor. Her testimony and medical records conflicted time and time again ...."
New legislation proposed in Beijing signals the likely end of the "one country, two systems" policy that has allowed Hong Kong to flourish.
Seems right to me, at least as a general matter.
But permanent injunctions after a full trial on the merits might be a different story.
The idea is not so far-fetched.
Hamas "used and relied on" Facebook "as among its most important tools to facilitate and carry out its terrorist activity," the plaintiffs claimed.
of dissecting each of the sixteen bullet points illustrates the deficiency of plaintiffs’ complaint."
We've seen this before...
An important decision from the Massachusetts high court.
The anti-prostitution pledge is unconstitutional when applied to U.S. nonprofits. But the feds say it's still OK to compel speech from these groups' foreign affiliates.
Mark Zuckerberg can't please the anti-tech populists on the left and the right, no matter what he does.
Josh Duggar had sued over the government's releasing records of his juvenile investigation.
An important First Amendment holding in a factually fascinating case, which involves an alleged breach of contract, a World War II Medal of Honor, a dispute over a history book, and a discussion of anti-libel injunctions.
But other courts in the Ninth Circuit have categorically said that such injunctions are unconstitutional—the law remains quite unclear.
Not a great thing to see in an appellate opinion, if you claimed that reviewing a court order shows that you should win.
A state trooper believed a man driving by and flipping the bird at the cops constituted disorderly conduct. (It didn't.)
We've filed a friend-of-the-court brief asking the Tennessee Supreme Court to review the case.
The Federalist's Ben Domenech is fighting the government in court.
The Eighth Circuit lawsuit remains pending.
Anti-porn crusaders get their panties in a twist about a uptick in porn consumption during COVID-19.
While his own prison is not yet facing a huge problem, Brandon Baxter had a prescient complaint for which he seems to be being punished.
And they would, I think, be peaceable assembly protected by the First Amendment, even in a time of epidemic.
She thinks she was -- but the police thought she wasn't (based on a negative test).
"Anything you can do, I can do meta."
"Unless government prohibits the event during this time, we allow it to be organized on Facebook," a company spokesperson tells Reason.
... they apparently shed it well before the schoolhouse gate.
The subpoena had been issued on behalf of a criminal defendant, who wants to buttress his self-defense argument by getting a copy of an expired Instagram Story that had been sent to him by the alleged victim.
The Mississippi Court of Appeals just overturned the conviction, and struck down the underlying statute, which banned posting messages "whether truthful or untruthful" "for the purpose of causing injury to any person."
before UK independent press standards tribunal.
The common law, the First Amendment, and California court rules provide a broad right of access to court documents.
The government has broad emergency powers, but that doesn't mean the Constitution is suspended.
The Newsweek article, among other things, quoted a professor who said two young public supporters of Trump "'camouflage' positions of the hard right 'as feel-good sweetness and light, when, in fact, they are defending raw racism and sexual abuse.'"
I, however, do not apologize.
They trade tips and manuals through a decentralized information-sharing network. Biomedical technicians say it's the fastest and easiest way to get life-saving information.
The lawsuit is the latest in a string of frivolous suits the president's reelection campaign has filed against media outlets.
A federal magistrate holds that the right of access to court records precludes such sealing.
The case was a hate crime hoax perpetrated by a SUNY Albany student.
That violates the Mississippi Religious Freedom Restoration Act, and probably the freedom of assembly and association.
The Liberty University president thinks two reporters' coverage was unfair—so he wants them arrested.
Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.
This modal will close in 10
