This Crackdown on a Jury Nullification Activist Violates the First Amendment
What’s at stake in Michigan v. Wood
What’s at stake in Michigan v. Wood
A clear First Amendment violation, I think -- but it's the law in Tennessee.
Online platforms would have to "earn" speech protections by compromising encryption—all in the name of fighting child porn.
GOP attacks on internet smut are heating up, but the porn industry has more practical threats to worry about.
The attempted muzzling of the former national security advisor is dubious.
When politicians call to punish “disinformation,” we should worry about what that definition encompasses.
Erroneous predictions of violence at the Richmond rally conflated civil libertarians with militant racists.
That's the logical implication of a recent Second Circuit panel decision (though one involving a non-journalist).
A federal court has allowed the case to go forward, and is considering whether to preliminarily enjoin the restrictions.
No, Californians aren't banned from showering and doing laundry on the same day. But the fact that so many people believed that lie says something about how insane the state's real water laws are.
"I don't think you should do Twitter if you think you're better than Twitter."
Plus: Clinton says "nobody likes" Bernie, Biden wants Section 230 revoked, Iran takes responsibility for Jan. 8 plane crash, and more...
A new story from Fox 11 (L.A.).
Biden tells the New York Times he would revoke Section 230 protections and hold Facebook (and other sites) liable for their content.
The New York Public Library calls off an event featuring feminists who have clashed with the trans rights movement.
"On the record before the Court, the movants have demonstrated 'sufficiently serious questions going to the merits to make them a fair ground for litigation.'"
The city limits busking to its tiny Theater District, and it makes you jump through hoops even to play there.
This is the case where two students were shouting "nigger" loudly when walking by UConn dorms; the students are trying to block university discipline based on their speech, including their eviction from student housing.
The students say their threatened punishment, for walking near student housing shouting "nigger" (at no-one in particular), violates both the First Amendment and a 1990 consent decree.
"The public may well have an interest in how litigation is funded by third parties," the judge concludes. A law firm and two litigation finance companies are disputing (among other things) whether the litigation finance agreements are illegally usurious.
By complaining to Yale about Bandy Lee's violation of the Goldwater Rule, Dershowitz lets her portray herself as a brave dissident.
Episode 9 of Free Speech Rules, a video series by UCLA Law Professor Eugene Volokh
So a New Jersey tax court held last week, in a case brought by prominent bank founder Vernon W. Hill.
Asheen Phansey's was responding to President Trump's threat to bomb Iranian cultural sites.
There's also more to the case, which was brought over statements made on a local TV broadcast while Morrissey was unsuccessfully running for Richmond Mayor. (He is now a state senator, elected in November.)
This is the case in which two students were walking near UConn student housing, loudly shouting "nigger" (apparently after having decided that loudly shouting "penis" wasn't good enough).
The overturned rules banned microscopes and shovels as drug paraphernalia and prohibited pictures of cannabis or the equipment used to grow it.
The plaintiff is a former Philadelphia officer, who was charged with (and acquitted of) wrongly threatening people with a gun; she claims the documentary wrongly portrayed her as "dirty and dishonest."
The statements about former law student Jonathan Mullane were either fair report of court proceedings or constitutionally protected opinions (e.g., calling Mullane "'rude,' 'dumb,' 'unethical,' a 'little entitled ponce,' and a 'dauphin'").
that I had gotten from a court docket while it has not been sealed, but that the movant is seeking to seal.
A massive 15 foot tall Trump/Pence yard sign has unfortunately turned political.
No, says the trial court, and the Minnesota Court of Appeals agrees.
"If 2018 was the year that the concept of 'cancel culture' went mainstream, then 2019 may be the year that cancel culture cancels itself."
Lenny Pozner has tried to get Amazon Web Services to remove a post of mine.
"The point was to engage students in an otherwise dry and difficult subject material."
They probably won't succeed in criminalizing Pornhub, but manifesto-wielding conservatives are trying to reshape the GOP into a movement against individualism.
"I have no faith left in call-out vigilante justice."
No dice, says the District Court.
Celebrate your independence with a subscription to Reason magazine, your most trusted source of honest, insightful news and analysis.