Don Lemon May Be a Hack, but That Does Not Make Him a Felon
The federal case against the former CNN anchor hinges on conduct that can plausibly be viewed as part of a journalist's work, combined with the obvious partiality of that work.
The federal case against the former CNN anchor hinges on conduct that can plausibly be viewed as part of a journalist's work, combined with the obvious partiality of that work.
The bill has a wide variety of groups worried that they could be targeted for criticism of large agribusinesses.
Yes, that includes drag queen story hour.
A federal indictment accuses him and another journalist of conspiring with protesters who disrupted a St. Paul church service.
But Council Member Peter Ortiz had gotten a temporary order that was in effect for nearly four months; the underlying disputed stemmed from a controversy related to a "Drag Queen story time."
in a lawsuit brought by the Babylon Bee.
A new bill in Wyoming aims to defend Americans against the U.K.’s online regulators.
"The Court's defense of political speech remains essential to American democracy five decades later."
FBI Director Kash Patel pays lip service to the First and Second Amendments while casting suspicion on people who exercise their First or Second Amendment rights.
"The landmark decision recognized that effective political speech requires the ability to pool resources and communicate at scale."
Here's why I believe TikTok.
A friend profiles Buckley himself, a public servant who spent his life defending constitutional first principles.
"An original Buckley litigator shares the inside story of one of America’s most important political speech victories."
The final article from the "Gitlow v. New York at 100" symposium, held last year at the Arizona State University Sandra Day O'Connor College of Law.
In the first social media addiction case to reach a jury, K.G.M. claims TikTok, YouTube, and other platforms are responsible for her depression, anxiety, and poor self esteem.
"How the decision did and did not change the world."
The video is the latest example of federal immigration authorities labeling anyone who opposes them a "domestic terrorist."
"What social science can tell us."
"Buckley v. Valeo confines campaign finance regulation to actual corruption, rather than amorphous claims about 'undue influence.'"
The Order raises the inference that his actions were targeted for their message; without the Order, there would have been a much stronger inference that he was prosecuted just for the illegal fire lighting (in violation of valid park safety regulations).
Celebrate your independence with a subscription to Reason magazine, your most trusted source of honest, insightful news and analysis.