Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
    • Reason TV
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • Free Media
    • The Reason Interview
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • Freed Up
    • The Soho Forum Debates
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Log In

Create new account

Free Speech

ICE Warns Syracuse Poll Worker To Delete a Political Instagram Post

Federal law can punish true threats, and doxing intended to facilitate violence. But this woman simply named a government agent, which is not a crime.

Reem Ibrahim | 6.29.2026 2:24 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
Syracuse resident Paigelynne Gonyea being approached by ICE agents | Paigelynne Gonyea/syracusecom/Youtube
(Paigelynne Gonyea/syracusecom/Youtube)

Over the past year and a half, Trump administration officials have gone after protestors—and even apps—critical of the government's immigration policies. Now, federal agents are targeting individuals for constitutionally protected speech on social media.

Last week, Syracuse resident Paigelynne Gonyea was approached by two Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents at her workplace and given a warning to remove a social media post on an Instagram account the agents believed was hers. In a letter given to Gonyea, the ICE agents say the post may have broken federal law, as reported by Syracuse.com.

"YOU MAY BE IN VIOLATION OF FEDERAL LAW," the document she shared on Instagram reads. "OPR (ICE's Office of Professional Responsibility) has identified an Instagram post handle 'TURNDAPAIGEOFFICAL', which it has reason to believe may constitute a violation of Title 18 of the U.S. Code. Accordingly, OPR is requesting that you promptly remove and/or discontinue the aforementioned behavior."

Under Section 115 of Title 18, it is illegal to threaten to assault, kidnap, or murder a federal official, federal law enforcement officer, or their immediate family member when the threat is intended to impede, intimidate, interfere with, or retaliate against that official for doing their job. A threat made in violation of this statute could carry up to 10 years in prison. Section 119, meanwhile, prohibits knowingly publishing "restricted personal information" about protected people, but only when it is done with the intent to threaten, intimidate, or incite a crime of violence, or with the knowledge that the information will be used for that purpose. Therefore, the laws do not criminalize criticizing or naming a federal officer, but prohibit threats and doxing carried out with a specific unlawful intent.

Gonyea, who posts about immigration on her social media frequently, says the post at issue named the ICE agent who shot protester Renée Good in Minnesota, and who had already been identified in public reporting. "BREAKING: The ICE agent who shot and killed Renee Good in broad daylight has been identified as Jonathan Ross by the Minnesota Star Tribune. I think today is a great day for Jonathan to be indicted!" the post says.

The post, as described, appears to fall short of breaking the statutes cited in the warning. It did not include Ross' address, phone number, Social Security number, or other personal information, nor did she threaten to assault him. It merely named a federal agent who had already been identified in news reports and expressed the view that he should be indicted.

Gonyea denies threatening anyone or publishing private information. "I didn't dox his personal information, such as address, phone number," she told Syracuse.com. She has contacted the attorney general's office, her local congressman, Syracuse Mayor Sharon Owens, and the New York Civil Liberties Union. She has no plans to delete the post.

"For ICE to come to me over a social media post just feels very 1984 to me…They definitely should have known better to not go into a polling place, even if I said it was OK," she told the outlet.

Armed federal agents showing up at a poll worker's workplace to pressure her to delete a political Instagram post without charging her, obtaining a court order, or clearly identifying the supposedly unlawful language raises obvious concerns about government officials using intimidation to silence critics.

Notably, the document doesn't give Gonyea a practical way to challenge or clarify the warning. It tells her to contact "the undersigned Special Agent who served you with this Warning Notice to the local OPR field office" if she wishes to discuss it further, but, as the photo of the document on her Instagram shows, the section where the agent's name and contact details are supposed to be added is blank.

Gonyea is not the first American to face scrutiny from law enforcement over a social media post. In October, Larry Bushart, a 61-year-old former police officer in Tennessee, was arrested and held on a $2 million bond after posting a Facebook meme about President Donald Trump. Both Bushart's case and Gonyea's illustrate how quickly officials can treat political speech as a criminal threat, even when the likelihood of actual violence is speculative at best.

"A free America doesn't dispatch federal law enforcement agents to intimidate someone for an Instagram post of publicly available information," said Adam Steinbaugh, senior attorney at the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (FIRE), regarding Gonyea's case. "Free speech is the bedrock of a free society, and the First Amendment squarely prohibits ICE agents from intimidating Americans for nothing more than repeating information from a newspaper report. As we approach the 250th anniversary of our independence from England, where police now hassle residents over social media posts, let's not follow their lead."

Gonyea's encounter occurs at a moment when Americans are increasingly worried that free speech is under threat. According to a FIRE poll from November 2025, a record 74 percent of Americans believe free speech in the U.S. is headed in the wrong direction. The poll found that 53 percent of Americans are "very" or "extremely" concerned about government officials pressuring social media companies to remove content based on the ideology expressed.

Federal officials showing up at a woman's workplace to pressure her to delete a political social media post certainly makes fears about threats to free speech in America feel far less abstract.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: In Big Win for Fourth Amendment Advocates, the Supreme Court Says 'Geofence Warrants' Count as a 'Search'

Reem Ibrahim is a research fellow, policy and media at Reason.

Free SpeechImmigrationSocial MediaFirst AmendmentICECensorshipGovernment abuseCivil LibertiesNew York
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (13)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Agammamon   1 hour ago

    >Trump administration officials have gone after protestors—and even apps

    The apps are not 'critical' - they are intlogence gathering tool intended to make it easier to attack government agents

    You may think that is a good thing - there is an argument for that - but that is what they are. Make that argument if you think you can but don't carry water for these people by lying.

    Log in to Reply
  2. Agammamon   1 hour ago

    >Federal officials showing up at a woman's workplace to pressure her to delete a political social media post certainly makes fears about threats to free speech in America feel far less abstract.

    The thing about Reason, and aot of other people, is you all are perfectly fine with these things happening - if you can pretend they are not.

    So 'a private company doing private things' was fine - Reason noticeably shit up when the jawboning was actually exposed. Not protested it, just just up.

    Biden was 'the adults are back in charge' because you could go back to pretending with Grandpa.

    Log in to Reply
  3. Agammamon   1 hour ago

    And Ibrahim, our UK expert, where is the article about the people in the UK being mass arrested for social media posts critical of Islam?

    Log in to Reply
    1. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   46 minutes ago

      Nothing to see there!

      Log in to Reply
  4. Fu Manchu   1 hour ago

    Our resident retard here in the comments is okay with the government banning the public's speech about government actions (banning ICE apps), is diametrically wrong about Reason's stance on Biden's jawboning (it's consistently been against it), and resorts to a total non-sequitor (UK's lack of free speech protections). Meanwhile, no comment on the actual substance of the article, the gov't knocking on people's doors for legal social media posts. Once again, Trump and his goons can literally do no wrong.

    Log in to Reply
    1. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   51 minutes ago

      No, you drunk bitch. This is why we can’t have your kind data basing ICE agents.

      https://x.com/mr_pool4/status/2071275150436380902?s=20

      Log in to Reply
      1. Fu Manchu   34 minutes ago

        Rights are for the government, not the people. That's why it's ok for ICE to keep databases of protesters but it's not ok for the public to keep databases of ICE agents.

        Log in to Reply
  5. MollyGodiva   52 minutes ago

    It gets worse. Federal armed police are not allowed in polling locations per 18 U.S.C. § 592.

    Log in to Reply
    1. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   47 minutes ago

      If illegals aren’t voting, what’s the problem Tony? Because that’s what this is all about, right? You want illegals voting to prop up your democrats.

      Log in to Reply
      1. MollyGodiva   43 minutes ago

        This has nothing at all to do with ineligible voters, this is about federal intimidation of voters while at the polls.

        It is sad how MAGAs will throw out all laws and decency in their unreasonable obsession over ineligible voters.

        Log in to Reply
        1. Idaho-Bob   32 minutes ago

          Who is intimidated by ICE agents at the polls?

          Log in to Reply
          1. Fu Manchu   10 minutes ago

            ICE has been shooting and arresting Americans, keeps a database of protesters, uses facial recognition to identify people, and is now knocking on people's doors for their social media posts. So anyone who is sufficiently brown, has spoken out against ICE, or has attended an anti-ICE protest has reason to be afraid. Just the groups your cult leader doesn't want to vote.

            Log in to Reply
  6. Mickey Rat   30 minutes ago

    "Gonyea is not the first American to face scrutiny from law enforcement over a social media post. In October, Larry Bushart..."

    Neither is Bushart the first. Does Douglass Mackey ring a bell?

    Log in to Reply

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

In Chatrie, Neil Gorsuch Reiterates His Critique of 2 Dubious Fourth Amendment Doctrines

Jacob Sullum | 6.29.2026 3:05 PM

ICE Warns Syracuse Poll Worker To Delete a Political Instagram Post

Reem Ibrahim | 6.29.2026 2:24 PM

In Big Win for Fourth Amendment Advocates, the Supreme Court Says 'Geofence Warrants' Count as a 'Search'

Damon Root | 6.29.2026 12:50 PM

Can the President Fire Anyone He Wants? Yes, Unless the Target Is Part of the Federal Reserve.

Eric Boehm | 6.29.2026 12:20 PM

The Mob Used To Run Sports Betting. Now DraftKings and FanDuel Do.

David Bockino | 6.29.2026 11:30 AM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS Add Reason to Google

© 2026 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

I WANT FREE MINDS AND FREE MARKETS!

Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.

Make a donation today! No thanks
r

I WANT TO FUND FREE MINDS AND FREE MARKETS

Every dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.

Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interested
r

SUPPORT HONEST JOURNALISM

So much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.

I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanks
r

PUSH BACK

Push back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.

My donation today will help Reason push back! Not today
r

HELP KEEP MEDIA FREE & FEARLESS

Back journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

STAND FOR FREE MINDS

Support journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.

Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanks
r

PUSH BACK AGAINST SOCIALIST IDEAS

Support journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

FIGHT BAD IDEAS WITH FACTS

Back independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

BAD ECONOMIC IDEAS ARE EVERYWHERE. LET’S FIGHT BACK.

Support journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

JOIN THE FIGHT FOR FREEDOM

Support journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

BACK JOURNALISM THAT PUSHES BACK AGAINST SOCIALISM

Your support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

FIGHT BACK AGAINST BAD ECONOMICS.

Donate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks