Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
    • Reason TV
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • Free Media
    • The Reason Interview
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • Freed Up
    • The Soho Forum Debates
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Log In

Create new account

Free Speech

ICE Warns Syracuse Poll Worker To Delete a Political Instagram Post

Federal law can punish true threats, and doxing intended to facilitate violence. But this woman simply named a government agent, which is not a crime.

Reem Ibrahim | 6.29.2026 2:24 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
Syracuse resident Paigelynne Gonyea being approached by ICE agents | Paigelynne Gonyea/syracusecom/Youtube
(Paigelynne Gonyea/syracusecom/Youtube)

Over the past year and a half, Trump administration officials have gone after protestors—and even apps—critical of the government's immigration policies. Now, federal agents are targeting individuals for constitutionally protected speech on social media.

Last week, Syracuse resident Paigelynne Gonyea was approached by two Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents at her workplace and given a warning to remove a social media post on an Instagram account the agents believed was hers. In a letter given to Gonyea, the ICE agents say the post may have broken federal law, as reported by Syracuse.com.

"YOU MAY BE IN VIOLATION OF FEDERAL LAW," the document she shared on Instagram reads. "OPR (ICE's Office of Professional Responsibility) has identified an Instagram post handle 'TURNDAPAIGEOFFICAL', which it has reason to believe may constitute a violation of Title 18 of the U.S. Code. Accordingly, OPR is requesting that you promptly remove and/or discontinue the aforementioned behavior."

Under Section 115 of Title 18, it is illegal to threaten to assault, kidnap, or murder a federal official, federal law enforcement officer, or their immediate family member when the threat is intended to impede, intimidate, interfere with, or retaliate against that official for doing their job. A threat made in violation of this statute could carry up to 10 years in prison. Section 119, meanwhile, prohibits knowingly publishing "restricted personal information" about protected people, but only when it is done with the intent to threaten, intimidate, or incite a crime of violence, or with the knowledge that the information will be used for that purpose. Therefore, the laws do not criminalize criticizing or naming a federal officer, but prohibit threats and doxing carried out with a specific unlawful intent.

Gonyea, who posts about immigration on her social media frequently, says the post at issue named the ICE agent who shot protester Renée Good in Minnesota, and who had already been identified in public reporting. "BREAKING: The ICE agent who shot and killed Renee Good in broad daylight has been identified as Jonathan Ross by the Minnesota Star Tribune. I think today is a great day for Jonathan to be indicted!" the post says.

The post, as described, appears to fall short of breaking the statutes cited in the warning. It did not include Ross' address, phone number, Social Security number, or other personal information, nor did she threaten to assault him. It merely named a federal agent who had already been identified in news reports and expressed the view that he should be indicted.

Gonyea denies threatening anyone or publishing private information. "I didn't dox his personal information, such as address, phone number," she told Syracuse.com. She has contacted the attorney general's office, her local congressman, Syracuse Mayor Sharon Owens, and the New York Civil Liberties Union. She has no plans to delete the post.

"For ICE to come to me over a social media post just feels very 1984 to me…They definitely should have known better to not go into a polling place, even if I said it was OK," she told the outlet.

Armed federal agents showing up at a poll worker's workplace to pressure her to delete a political Instagram post without charging her, obtaining a court order, or clearly identifying the supposedly unlawful language raises obvious concerns about government officials using intimidation to silence critics.

Notably, the document doesn't give Gonyea a practical way to challenge or clarify the warning. It tells her to contact "the undersigned Special Agent who served you with this Warning Notice to the local OPR field office" if she wishes to discuss it further, but, as the photo of the document on her Instagram shows, the section where the agent's name and contact details are supposed to be added is blank.

Gonyea is not the first American to face scrutiny from law enforcement over a social media post. In October, Larry Bushart, a 61-year-old former police officer in Tennessee, was arrested and held on a $2 million bond after posting a Facebook meme about President Donald Trump. Both Bushart's case and Gonyea's illustrate how quickly officials can treat political speech as a criminal threat, even when the likelihood of actual violence is speculative at best.

"A free America doesn't dispatch federal law enforcement agents to intimidate someone for an Instagram post of publicly available information," said Adam Steinbaugh, senior attorney at the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (FIRE), regarding Gonyea's case. "Free speech is the bedrock of a free society, and the First Amendment squarely prohibits ICE agents from intimidating Americans for nothing more than repeating information from a newspaper report. As we approach the 250th anniversary of our independence from England, where police now hassle residents over social media posts, let's not follow their lead."

Gonyea's encounter occurs at a moment when Americans are increasingly worried that free speech is under threat. According to a FIRE poll from November 2025, a record 74 percent of Americans believe free speech in the U.S. is headed in the wrong direction. The poll found that 53 percent of Americans are "very" or "extremely" concerned about government officials pressuring social media companies to remove content based on the ideology expressed.

Federal officials showing up at a woman's workplace to pressure her to delete a political social media post certainly makes fears about threats to free speech in America feel far less abstract.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: In Big Win for Fourth Amendment Advocates, the Supreme Court Says 'Geofence Warrants' Count as a 'Search'

Reem Ibrahim is a research fellow, policy and media at Reason.

Free SpeechImmigrationSocial MediaFirst AmendmentICECensorshipGovernment abuseCivil LibertiesNew York
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (44)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Agammamon   2 months ago

    >Trump administration officials have gone after protestors—and even apps

    The apps are not 'critical' - they are intlogence gathering tool intended to make it easier to attack government agents

    You may think that is a good thing - there is an argument for that - but that is what they are. Make that argument if you think you can but don't carry water for these people by lying.

  2. Agammamon   2 months ago

    >Federal officials showing up at a woman's workplace to pressure her to delete a political social media post certainly makes fears about threats to free speech in America feel far less abstract.

    The thing about Reason, and aot of other people, is you all are perfectly fine with these things happening - if you can pretend they are not.

    So 'a private company doing private things' was fine - Reason noticeably shit up when the jawboning was actually exposed. Not protested it, just just up.

    Biden was 'the adults are back in charge' because you could go back to pretending with Grandpa.

  3. Agammamon   2 months ago

    And Ibrahim, our UK expert, where is the article about the people in the UK being mass arrested for social media posts critical of Islam?

    1. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   2 months ago

      Nothing to see there!

    2. Lester75   2 months ago

      Deflect, deflect. We are talking about the U.S. government here, not the UK, who are bad enough. This behavior is big-brotherish. If the press already published a name, that name is out there already, not 'doxxed'.

      1. Clipton   2 months ago

        Not a deflection but a valid comment on the hypocrisy of the author. As we say in the criminal law profession, credibility is always at issue and that applies for the same reason to the Media.

  4. Fu Manchu   2 months ago

    Our resident retard here in the comments is okay with the government banning the public's speech about government actions (banning ICE apps), is diametrically wrong about Reason's stance on Biden's jawboning (it's consistently been against it), and resorts to a total non-sequitor (UK's lack of free speech protections). Meanwhile, no comment on the actual substance of the article, the gov't knocking on people's doors for legal social media posts. Once again, Trump and his goons can literally do no wrong.

    1. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   2 months ago

      No, you drunk bitch. This is why we can’t have your kind data basing ICE agents.

      https://x.com/mr_pool4/status/2071275150436380902?s=20

      1. Fu Manchu   2 months ago

        Rights are for the government, not the people. That's why it's ok for ICE to keep databases of protesters but it's not ok for the public to keep databases of ICE agents.

        1. Normal Guy   2 months ago

          You can keep it, you can share it with your friends, and it's constitutionally protected - just don't be surprised when they come for you.

          Be advised: if you have dependents (young or elderly) who need you, don't take that risk. CPS/APS might take them and they'll become vulnerable as a result of your actions. If you have aliments that need monitoring and medication, don't take that risk. You could die alone in a cell just from neglect. Think about the consequences you face between now and your court date and accept it as part of the price of acting against or protesting the federal government. If it's too great, you're not a coward. It's just "you're not the guy". That's okay, there's value in knowing and accepting when you should let someone else do the work.

          I'm always a little disappointed when a protestor or partisan freaks out or cries over their arrest. Sometimes being arrested is part of the show. You should accept that possibility before stepping in it.

        2. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   2 months ago

          Many of your ‘protesters’ are domestic terrorists or their collaborators. Like that traitor democrat ‘protester’ in the video threatening to murder the ICE officer’s family.

          But of course you’re all for that, right Sarc? I’ll bet you’re an antifa toadie out doing their bidding between your drunken binges.

  5. MollyGodiva   2 months ago

    It gets worse. Federal armed police are not allowed in polling locations per 18 U.S.C. § 592.

    1. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   2 months ago

      If illegals aren’t voting, what’s the problem Tony? Because that’s what this is all about, right? You want illegals voting to prop up your democrats.

      1. MollyGodiva   2 months ago

        This has nothing at all to do with ineligible voters, this is about federal intimidation of voters while at the polls.

        It is sad how MAGAs will throw out all laws and decency in their unreasonable obsession over ineligible voters.

        1. Idaho-Bob   2 months ago

          Who is intimidated by ICE agents at the polls?

          1. Fu Manchu   2 months ago

            ICE has been shooting and arresting Americans, keeps a database of protesters, uses facial recognition to identify people, and is now knocking on people's doors for their social media posts. So anyone who is sufficiently brown, has spoken out against ICE, or has attended an anti-ICE protest has reason to be afraid. Just the groups your cult leader doesn't want to vote.

            1. Liberty_Belle   2 months ago

              +1

              1. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   2 months ago

                Yes, as in Walz +1.

            2. DesigNate   2 months ago

              I wonder if anybody warned about turning a blind eye to illegal immigration…

            3. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   2 months ago

              So are you expecting voters at the polls to attack ICE officers, or attempt to run them over? Outside of that, if you’re not an illegal, you have nothing to fear from them.

              But you’re a lying, raving drunk. Just making up shit that hasn’t happened, as usual.

              1. Fu Manchu   2 months ago

                Libertarian bootlickers, a sight I never thought I'd see.

                1. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   2 months ago

                  No response, as expected.

            4. Super Scary   2 months ago

              "ICE has been shooting and arresting Americans, "

              Well, I don't plan on running any of them over with my car, so I'll be fine.

          2. Rick James   2 months ago

            The polling place known as Instagram.

          3. Lester75   2 months ago

            Any citizen who looks even vaguely minority would be intimidated after ICE started dragging citizens who looked Mexican out of cars and forced that old Asian guy out of his own house in the cold because a sex offender immigrant had lived there 2 years ago (and don't tell me he was 'resisting' - all he said was that the guy they were looking for wasn't there.) If you don't look white, ICE guys with guns are intimidating. Walk a mile in their shoes. I predict that ICE guys are going to pull minority-looking citizens out of polling lines and 'detain' them until the polls close for the day because their RealID driver's licenses don't like 'real' enough.

        2. Clipton   2 months ago

          Enlighten us as to the reasonable degree of concern over ineligible voters of which you would approve.

    2. DesigNate   2 months ago

      “…(ICE) agents at her workplace and…”

      It was t at the polling location, you blithering boob.

      1. MollyGodiva   2 months ago

        I don't know why MAGAs lie about easily verifiable facts. You know it just makes you look lame.

        1. DesigNate   2 months ago

          Ha, in my rush to call you a boob, I didn’t verify if they were two different places (poll workers here are usually volunteers, so the polls aren’t their “workplace”). My bad.

        2. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   2 months ago

          You mean the way you constantly make bullshit claims and link sources that don’t say what you alleged they say?

          Drunk, communist, and stupid is no way to go through life.

        3. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   2 months ago

          Tony, you’ve been caught here lying, literally hundreds of times over the years. Whereas we tell the truth.

  6. Mickey Rat   2 months ago

    "Gonyea is not the first American to face scrutiny from law enforcement over a social media post. In October, Larry Bushart..."

    Neither is Bushart the first. Does Douglass Mackey ring a bell?

    1. Bananas   2 months ago

      Imprisoned = not noteworthy
      "Warned" Noteworthy.

      Don't you even Reason bro?

      1. SQRLSY   2 months ago

        tReason hasn't bitched about the depredations of Genghis Khan lately, either! This PROVES the tReason.cum ADORES the depredations of Genghis Khan!

        (In the sub-pea-sized so-called "brains" of True Tribalists, shit is!)

    2. mad.casual   2 months ago

      Remember when Kim Davis refused to issue marriage licenses in whatever backwater county she was secretary of with her signature on them?

      1. SQRLSY   2 months ago

        Yes, Government Almighty parasites DO, from time to time, draw their paychecks and then REFUSE to do their duties!

        Which has twat do do with the matters at hand??

    3. Zeb   2 months ago

      Maybe no one should be hassled by the authorities for social media posts?

  7. Thoritsu   2 months ago

    ... but it was ok during COVID ...

    1. SQRLSY   2 months ago

      Butt, whatabout that them thar whatabouts? Twatabout Hillary? Whatabout OJ Simpson?

      How many brain cells does it take to run a socio-political simulation on the following:

      Judge and Jury: “Murderer, we find you guilty of murder! 20 years in the hoosegow for YOU! Now OFF with ye!”

      Murderer: “But OJ Simpson got off for murder, why not me? We’re all equal, and need to be treated likewise-equal!”

      Judge and Jury: “Oh, yes, sure, we forgot about that! You’re free to go! Have a good life, and try not to murder too many MORE people, please! Goodbye!”

      Now WHERE does this line of thinking and acting lead to? Think REALLY-REALLY HARD now, please! What ABOUT OJ Simpson, now? Can we make progress towards peace & justice in this fashion?

      (Ass for me, I think we should have PUT THE SQUEEZE on OJ!)

  8. Rev Arthur L kuckland (5-30-24 banana republic day)   2 months ago

    Okay fine. She can do the feral agget, but if any harm comes to that agent, his family, his neighbors, or his coworkers 100 times the people involved will be killed. If someone throws a brick through his window, that poll worker and 100 of her political allies get killed. Does that sound like a fair deal?

    If you think no, they you know the purpose of doxing is to create violence and intimidation towards said agents

    1. SQRLSY   2 months ago

      The purpose of the Reverend KnuckleHead is to spread violent AuthorShitarianism and TotalShitarianism. The health of the Tree of liberty may require the metaphorical shedding, from time to time, of the poisoned blood of AuthorShitarianists and TotalShitarianists.

    2. Zeb   2 months ago

      Meh. We all already knew his name. If that's all she posted to identify him, and all she did was call for an indictment, then confronting her about it seems way over the top. It's all public information and opinion.

      1. MoreFreedom   2 months ago

        The article states the law applies if one's actions "retaliate against that official for doing their job". One could easily argue that calling for an indictment is retaliation for doing their job. But I think that argument fails, since no one is above the law.

        This seems like a good court case for Gonyea, with the help of a free-speech advocating non-profit (at one time the ACLU would back freedom of speech and might do this one due to TDS, but IMHO they are part of the political class that doesn't want freedom of speech so won't) for violating her freedom of speech.

        On the other hand, if she is a supposedly non-partisan poll-worker, I don't think she should be posting about elections, but if she's a volunteer for a political party then she can. People working in government (other than elected officials) shouldn't be acting for partisan benefit - it creates the appearance of a conflict of interest.

        I'm not surprised ICE agents or their management believes calling for an ICE agent to be indicted is retaliation, but that argument fails the no one is above the law argument. This is regardless of where you stand on immunity for officers enforcing the law.

        1. rovers   2 months ago

          Wow.
          Someone commented objectively.
          Are you certain you're in the right place?

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Lawmakers Want To Stop Kids From Nicknaming Their Pokémon

Andy Jung | 8.29.2026 7:00 AM

9/11 Turbocharged America's Worst Foreign Policy Impulses—but Didn't Change Its Direction

Emma Ashford | From the August/September 2026 issue

Milo Yiannopoulos Wanted Millions Deported. He Didn't Mean Himself.

Billy Binion | 8.28.2026 5:22 PM

The CIA Is Making AI-Generated Reports for Local Police

Matthew Petti | 8.28.2026 4:31 PM

Judge Says Trump's Clampdown on Anthropic Violates the First Amendment

Tosin Akintola | 8.28.2026 3:41 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS Add Reason to Google

© 2026 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Reason's July 4 Special!

For America's 250th, Get 2 Years of Reason for $17.76

Celebrate your independence with a subscription to Reason magazine, your most trusted source of honest, insightful news and analysis.

Subscribe to Reason