Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
    • Reason TV
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • Free Media
    • The Reason Interview
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • Freed Up
    • The Soho Forum Debates
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Log In

Create new account

Tariffs

The Trump Administration Is Still Fighting To Keep Billions in Illegal Tariff Revenue

The administration has paid $20 billion in refunds. Now, it is asking a federal appeals court to limit which businesses will get the rest.

Eric Boehm | 6.5.2026 1:15 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
President Donald Trump with a court house in the background | Illustration: W.scott Mcgill/Dreamstime/EPA/MEGA/Newscom/RSSIL/Newscom
(Illustration: W.scott Mcgill/Dreamstime/EPA/MEGA/Newscom/RSSIL/Newscom)

The Trump administration is still fighting to keep billions of dollars in tariff revenue that it unlawfully collected from American businesses.

Despite begrudgingly starting to refund some of those tariff payments in April, the Trump administration told a federal court this week that it should not have to refund all those payments. If the administration prevails, it would only have to issue refunds to the businesses that filed lawsuits challenging the legality of those tariffs—which the U.S. Supreme Court struck down in February—while many other businesses would be out of luck.

Meanwhile, the Trump administration is also trying to shield a top customs official from appearing before the Court of International Trade (CIT) next week in defiance of a judge's order.

To understand how we got to this point, let's go back to the Supreme Court's ruling in February. The high court ruled that the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) "does not authorize the President to impose tariffs," but it left unanswered the question of what to do about the roughly $166 billion that importers had paid since Trump imposed those tariffs last year.

The task of sorting out the refund issue fell to the CIT, which in March issued a universal injunction telling the Trump administration to refund all of the IEEPA tariffs. At the time, Judge Richard Eaton wrote that "all importers of record whose entries were subject to IEEPA duties are entitled to the benefit of" the Supreme Court's ruling.

The Trump administration is now appealing that injunction to the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.

On Wednesday, Eaton responded to the Trump administration's appeal with a letter sent to the Justice Department and the appeals court. In the letter, Eaton took issue with the administration's claim that it had "voluntarily" engaged in the refund process. In several attachments pulled from the Customs and Border Protection's (CBP) own announcements of the refund process, Eaton highlighted how the Trump administration was acting in response to the CIT's orders.

"A stay would discourage continuing progress," he wrote.

All of this is happening against the backdrop of another, related fight between the administration and Eaton, who has ordered Customs and Border Protection Commissioner Rodney Scott to appear before the CIT next week to answer questions about the refund process.

Having apparently run out of patience with the administration's foot-dragging on the tariff refund issue, Eaton ordered Scott to appear before the court on June 9.

"Commissioner Scott's testimony is necessary to ascertain if it is the Government's policy to return all of the unlawfully collected duties either by complying with the court's order, or by some other means—that is, if it is the Government's policy to refund the duties to importers both large and small," Eaton wrote on May 29, in response to the Trump administration's initial attempt to get Scott off the hook. "There is $166 billion involved."

In the appeal filed this week, the Trump administration argued that the CIT could not compel Scott to show up for that hearing. As of Friday morning, the federal appeals court had not ruled on the matter.

Caught in the middle of all this are the many, many businesses that paid the illegal tariffs and are awaiting refunds—though some business owners have told Reason that they don't have much hope of ever seeing that money again.

"Judge Eaton's latest filing makes an important point: the progress made so far toward refunding unlawful IEEPA tariffs ONLY happened because the court ordered the government to act," the Liberty Justice Center, which represented many of the plaintiffs in the IEEPA tariff case, wrote on Twitter in response to Eaton's letter this week. "American businesses deserve their money back, and we will continue fighting to ensure those refunds are delivered quickly and fairly."

So far, more than $20 billion in refunds have been issued, the Trump administration told the federal appeals court this week. In its latest progress report filed to the CIT on May 26, CPB said $85 billion in refunds were "processing."

That still leaves tens of billions of dollars in unlawfully collected tariffs that must be refunded. Eaton is right to keep up the pressure on the Trump administration, which seems determined to weasel out of paying as many refunds as possible and keeping some of the ill-gotten gains from its unlawful tariff scheme.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: The Debate Over Israel Aid Is Coming. Congress Wants To Future-Proof the Relationship First.

Eric Boehm is a reporter at Reason.

TariffsFree TradeTrump AdministrationFederal CourtsDepartment of JusticeCourtsSmall BusinessBusiness and Industry
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (13)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Untermensch   2 months ago

    I’m sure some of the usual crowd of Trumpolators will be along any time now to tell us why this is all the fault of a “liberal activist judge” and explain why tariffs are a good thing.

    1. con_fuse9   2 months ago

      How about the universal truth. Once you give the government money, good luck getting it back.
      The money has already been spent.

    2. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   2 months ago

      Well we knew the usual communist faggots would be here to bitch and whine. And here you are.

      Are you a new one? Or someone like Pedo Jeffy with a new sock?

  2. MollyGodiva   2 months ago

    The administration told the court that a preliminary injunction was not needed because there is no irreparable harm because all tariffs could be refunded. Now they are saying that was false. They can't have it both ways.

    1. con_fuse9   2 months ago

      What? They lied? Color me shocked!

  3. car-keynes   2 months ago

    So the tariffs were an honest mistake.

  4. car-keynes   2 months ago

    I guess we'll be waiting to see which party politicians get charged with treason first once national debt becomes an unavoidable avalanche of consequence.

    1. MollyGodiva   2 months ago

      Democrats. It is the Republican's fault but they will blame the Ds.

      1. TJJ2000   2 months ago

        LOL... So which big part of the Debt did Republicans pass again?
        What's that about SS and Medicare/Medicaid being 80%+ of the debt problem?
        Do you think Republicans did that?

      2. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   2 months ago

        So faggot, tell us about when the democrats cut the budget.

  5. TJJ2000   2 months ago

    I look forward to the day a [D]emon-crap presidents Tariffs gets refuted.
    For some reason; I just don't think that day will ever come.

    That said. Nothing fits the status-quo like 'importers' getting big checks on domestic producers backs.

    1. scotterbee   2 months ago

      Amazing how just prospect of potentially owning the libs in the future keeps these crazies going. Its a forever mind virus, me thinks

  6. Uomo Del Ghiaccio   2 months ago

    For the most part, Corporations don't actually pay taxes, they pass the expense to their consumers.

    If the tariffs are returned to the corporations will these corporations pass the refunds to their consumers?

    Will these corporations reduce the prices that were increased to cover the tariffs back to the previous levels?

    The answer is NO and NO. The Tariffs are yet another example where the rich and powerful are protected, but the rest of us are not.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Brickbat: Banned T-Shirt

Charles Oliver | 8.5.2026 4:00 AM

Dropped Cases Against Alleged Reflecting Pool Vandals Followed a Rush to Judgment

Jacob Sullum | 8.5.2026 12:01 AM

Boy Throb Had To Go Viral To Get Its Fourth Member a U.S. Visa

Reem Ibrahim | 8.4.2026 4:02 PM

Greg Abbott Once Called Texas the 'Epicenter' of AI. Now He's Freezing Data Center Construction.

Jeff Luse | 8.4.2026 3:21 PM

The YIMBY-Libertarian Convergence

Christian Britschgi | 8.4.2026 11:50 AM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS Add Reason to Google

© 2026 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Reason's July 4 Special!

For America's 250th, Get 2 Years of Reason for $17.76

Celebrate your independence with a subscription to Reason magazine, your most trusted source of honest, insightful news and analysis.

Subscribe to Reason