Governments Are Pushing Digital IDs. Are You Ready To Be Tracked?
Proponents say such IDs will make life easier and protect kids from dangerous content. But opponents worry they will make you much easier to target.
Politicians push government IDs.
In a TSA announcement, Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem sternly warns, "You will need a REAL ID to travel by air or visit federal buildings."
European politicians go much further, reports Stossel TV producer Kristin Tokarev.
They're pushing government-mandated digital IDs that tie your identity to nearly everything you do.
Spain's prime minister promises "an end to anonymity" on social media!
Britain's prime minister warns, "You will not be able to work in the United Kingdom if you do not have digital ID."
Queen Maxima of the Netherlands enthusiastically told the World Economic Forum that digital IDs are good for knowing "who actually got a vaccination or not."
Many American tech leaders also like digital IDs.
The second richest man in the world, Oracle founder Larry Ellison, says, "Citizens will be on their best behavior because we're constantly recording and reporting everything."
That's a good thing?
"That is a recipe for disaster and totalitarianism," says privacy specialist Naomi Brockwell. "Privacy is not about hiding. It's about an individual's right to decide for themselves who gets access to their data. A digital ID will strip individuals of that choice."
"I already have a government-issued ID," says Tokarev. "Why is a digital one worse?"
"It connects everything," says Brockwell. "Your financial decisions, social media posts, your likes, things that you're watching, places you're going. You won't be able to voice things anonymously online anymore. Everything you say will be tied back to who you are."
Digital ID backers say the new ID will make life easier.
"You can access your own money, make payments so much more easily," says the U.K.'s prime minister.
Yes, says Brockwell, "until those services start saying, 'No, you can't use our system.'"
Even without a digital ID, Canada froze the bank accounts of truckers who protested COVID-19 vaccine mandates.
With a digital ID, politicians could do that much more easily.
"You're essentially putting a giant target on every aspect of your life," warns Brockwell, "wrapping it up in a nice bow and saying, 'Here, if you want to control me, just untie this.'"
In the U.S., many states are passing age verification laws that require you to identify yourself and prove your age before accessing certain websites.
Proponents say this will protect kids from dangerous content.
"Unfortunately, politicians just can't promise that it will only ever be used for that," says Brockwell. "You always have governments with these great-sounding bills called the 'Let's-Stop-All-the-Bad-People
China does that.
People with low social credit scores may be denied entry into schools or find they cannot buy a train ticket.
"It makes you super easy to target," says Brockwell, "easy to silence if suddenly you become 'problematic.' Whoever controls that data has a lot of power. We're simply handing it to them. People need to be aware that they have no control over who will get access to this tool and who will control this tool in the future."
Tokarev points out that companies like Facebook, Google, and Chase Bank already have her data. "Shouldn't I trust my government more?"
"Governments, unlike companies, can throw you in jail," Brockwell replies.
"This is America," says Tokarev. "We're not going to become China."
"We are skyrocketing towards that direction," insists Brockwell. "The surveillance infrastructure we're trying to put in place in the United States is heading directly towards where China currently is."
What can we do about it?
"People need to be reminded that they're empowered to actually affect that change," says Brockwell. "They can reach out to representatives; they can push back. Protect themselves and not build this infrastructure in the first place."
COPYRIGHT 2025 BY JFS PRODUCTIONS INC.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please to post comments
I think a digital identification warehouse could be a useful thing.
Then you could choose to participate in forums that are completely anonymous, or one that's not full of sock puppets from 12 year olds.
I'm a bit alarmed by the legal transactions I can conduct through docusign. Click here to confirm that clicking is valid confirmation.
A federal requirement that you use digital identification on every comment section seems like overreach. But would we really be worse off if people stopped posting anonymously on Reason?
How is it more of an overreach than using it every time you fly or look at a government building?
If it can be used for anything, it can be used for everything.
I am sure if we had to post under our actual, verified, legal names, the number of commenters would drop like a stone. Just think of the manhours saved by not reading all those (used to be) grey boxes.
If it can be used for anything, it can be used for everything.
Unless one of the two forms of government ID that the girl R. Kelly is pissing on is a digital ID, you must acquit.
I'm a bit alarmed by the legal transactions I can conduct through docusign. Click here to confirm that clicking is valid confirmation.
From my own corner on the other side:
Imagine for a moment, people with no legal background or any sort of forensic expertise declaring the contract or transaction invalid because the signatures they can't read don't match even though all MAC addresses, device signatures, user-agents, IP addresses, domain names, encryption keys, and TFA match up.
It's like a modern, digital version of Capgras Syndrome.
Edit: The best is when you come back to these same "experts" about problems with TFA, internal or external, and they say things like "Why can't you just send the code to the email they used to log in?"
As if those current id cards aren't stored digitally every time they are used - - - - - - - -
If you use a real ID, it is usually scanned or photographed. I am sure those photos and scans aren't printed out, filed, and deleted from the system and all related backups.
I am waiting for the implementation of the digital id.
I envision something like a series of three six digit barcodes tattooed on the hand and forehead.
Just a little something you won't be allowed into the store without. And forget being able to place an Amazon order without it.
“You’re required to have digital ID”
“That’s fucked up, no way!”
“You’re required to have digital ID to get your free shit”
“Whatever you say, sir!”
I see a day will come when the fortunate among us have their own humanoid clone who will get the government ID and be on their best behavior.
The Nazis were greatly helped in their purges by the totally harmless and beneficial census records that identified people by their ethnicity , religion, nationality, gender, occupation, etc. IBM being a major architect of punch card records and early databases.
I'm sure that's just a coincidence and would never repeat in history.
"Are You Ready To Be Tracked?"
Well, yeah. I have been tracked for over a decade.
Do try to keep up.
It's too late to stop the technical progress that gave them the tools to do so.
The only option is to go full Luddite.