Help Reason Be Your Antidote to Lousy Journalism!
Make your tax-deductible gift to Reason's annual webathon today! Starting NOW, your next $50,000 are matched!
Reason's first annual fundraising webathon, in which we ask our most hardcore daily consumers to support their own habit with tax-deductible contributions, came all the way back in 2008. That's right: The webathon is now old enough to file a lawsuit, not vote, and opt out of the "Selective" Service.
CLICK HERE TO DONATE TO REASON EVEN BEFORE I MAKE MY CASE!
A lot has changed since 2008, not least our competitive set. This here pre-Festivus tradition has become an increasingly important contributor to our stubborn if cheerful resilience in the face of the political tumult and media collapse all around us. And now, since we've just matched Gerry Ohrstrom's $100,000 matching grant, we've got a NEW generous challenge from the Kleinschmidt Family Foundation, which means your next $50,000 worth of donations will be doubled!
About that media collapse bit. We've all seen it: Once-powerful news organizations now a shell of their former selves, worn like a skin suit by more explicitly agenda-driven younger staffers. Scarequote-worthy "cable news" channels that have traded fact-gathering and philosophical diversity for tribal cope. Even the more robust and interesting independent sphere has all too often surfed audience capture and political rage-bait toward destinations bordering on crazytown.
The informational ecosystem is sick. Reason is the antidote.
Reason magazine has, since our inaugural issue in June 1968, promised "proof, not belligerent assertion," "logic, not legends," all while championing explicit libertarianism in a distinctly anti-libertarian mediaverse. It's a potent combination: We've always been more skeptical of government than the most hard-bitten of journalists (see our classic 1981 debunking of the official Love Canal story); lately, we've been finding scoops doing basic verification stuff that alleged professionals have left behind.
It was Reason's Robby Soave who did the legwork to dismantle the media's false accusation that Covington Catholic high school student Nick Sandmann behaved at a Lincoln Memorial protest like a smirking racist. It was Christian Britschgi who demanded to know what research supported plastic-straw bans, only to discover that the ur-source was—wait for it!—9 years old. Rape hoaxes, nail-salon exposés based on mistranslation, Joe Biden's bubble-wrap—when the news biz sacrifices truth for narrative, Reason is there to set the record straight.
Alas, members and fans of the major political coalition knitted together by anti-media animus have not proven measurably better at generating and valuing truths, particularly as asserted in connection with proposed Republican exertions of state power. We are forever refuting not just bad ideas but bad facts: on trade and tariffs, immigration and inflation, science and sedition, welfare and war.
The comments left so far by 2025 Webathon donors underscore our role in calling balls and strikes in the ever-wilder world of politics and media. "Reason consistently does great journalism and cuts through the BS of mainstream media," writes one. "Sanity for an insane world," writes another. "Great to see journalism…not completely dead," adds a third.
We are not just alive, but thriving, thanks to thousands of individual contributions from people just like you. Help us cure what ails political discourse.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please to post comments
Is Reason trolling us with article titles like this one?
Then Reason needs to do the following:
1. Get out of DC.
2. Fire KMW.
3. Replace most of the writers with actual libertarians, not the liberal-tarians currently here
4. Do some actual investigative journalism.
They can keep Good Liz. Fire everyone else.
Oh come on Reason. You guys have the temerity to look at what people do instead of judging everything based upon the politics of the person doing it. That's the very definition of lousy journalism. If you were real journalists you'd understand that everything Trump does is great and everything Democrats do is wrong, even if they're both doing the exact same thing at the exact same time. It's all about who, not what. Until you give up your principles and judge everything based upon principals, you will continue to be lousy journalists.
TRUMP 2028!
Poor stupid sarcbot.
Proceeds benefit Welch's red wedding fund.
The lack of self awareness in this headline...
Sometimes o think they’re intentionally trying to punk us.
Does Reason accept Yuans?
I’m sure they do Tiananmen Tony.
Do it, or else!
https://x.com/mattwelch/status/1102654202545913857?s=12
Help Reason Be Your Antidote to Lousy Journalism!
Antidote to lousy journalism? Horsepaste!
How can Reason be the antidote to lousy journalism when Reason itself is flagrantly guilty of lousy, lazy journalism??
When was the last time Reason actually presented a principled, libertarian take on any topic? The closest -- Reason's libertarian-ish takes on consensual sex and drugs -- fall short of fully principled, libertarian views or arguments.