Trump's Tariffs Are Likely To Make Toys More Expensive This Christmas Shopping Season
In Trump's first term, he exempted many Chinese toys and household items from tariff hikes. This time, they're subject to a 30 percent import tax.
Santa Claus might be able to evade customs checkpoints as he magically smuggles toys into the country for the good boys and girls—but everyone else doing Christmas shopping this year could run into some problems.
Thanks to higher tariffs and other disruptions to global trade, some toys might be more expensive this holiday season. Others might be in short supply, and those that arrive from foreign countries by mail could come with a surprise nastier than a stocking full of coal: an expensive tax bill from the U.S. government.
To the average toy buyer, higher costs are the most visible impact of President Donald Trump's tariffs, which are taxes applied to goods that enter the United States. Imports from China, where many basic toys and games are made, are now subject to a 30 percent tariff. Unlike during Trump's first term, when many toys and other basic household items were exempted from the higher tariffs on Chinese goods, there are no carve-outs this time.
Tariffs are meant to reduce imports, and it seems that tariffs on toys are having that effect. Total U.S. toy imports fell by 31 percent in June 2025 compared to the same month a year earlier, after a year-over-year drop of 28 percent during May, according to data from The Toy Association.
The tariffs are affecting toys from other countries, too. Nintendo, the Japanese video game maker, announced in August that it would raise the price of its Switch gaming console by 15 percent in the United States. Officially, Nintendo said it was responding to "market conditions," but the decision was seemingly in response to the Trump administration slapping 15 percent tariffs on Japanese imports. (Trump has also imposed a 20 percent tariff on imports from Vietnam, where Nintendo does much of its manufacturing.)
The data are clear: "Tariffs are creating serious headwinds for the toy industry and are disrupting the flow of toys into the U.S. market ahead of the crucial holiday season," says Kathrin Belliveau, chief policy officer at The Toy Association. "Without relief, we risk seeing fewer products on store shelves, higher costs for families, and lasting strain on the businesses that bring play to children."
Trump tried to downplay the impact of those new levies shortly after they were announced earlier this year. "Maybe the children will have two dolls instead of 30 dolls," Trump told reporters at the White House in April. He added that the two dolls might "cost a couple of bucks more than they would normally."
Only a Grinch could celebrate that.
This article originally appeared in print under the headline "Will Tariffs Steal Christmas?."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please to post comments
Boehm’s unhealthy obsession with Trump’s tariffs seem worse than shrike and Hunter’s penis, SSqrlsy and Stormy Daniels, or jeff and bad analogies.
Scumby-Grinch says BIGGER and MORE POWERFUL Government Almighty, armed with always MORE tariff-taxes, swill make us all RICH!!!
(Butt ONLY when Dear orange Caligula is Large (He is!!!) and In Charge!!!)
ALL HAIL ScumbyFarter-Fuhrer-Grinch!!!
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⣠⣶⣶⣦⡀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢰⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠻⣿⣿⡿⠋⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣴⣶⣶⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣸⣿⣿⣿⣿⡄⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⢀⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣧⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⣼ DEMS ⣿⣆⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣠⣴⣶⣤⡀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⢰⣿⣿⣿⣿⠃⠈⢻⣿⣦⠀⠀⠀⠀⣸⣿⣿⣿⣿⣷⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠘⣿⣿⣿⡏⣴⣿⣷⣝⢿⣷⢀⠀⢀⣿⣿⣿⣿⡿⠋⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⢿⣿⣿⡿⢿⣿ SQRLSY ⣿ ⣿⣷⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⢸⣿⣿⣇⢸⣿⣿⡟⣙⠛⠻⣿⣿⣿⣿⡇⠀⠀⠀⠀
⣴⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣠⣿⣿⡇⠙⢷⣄⠀⠈⣽⣿⣇⣀⣀⣀⠀
⠙⠻⠿⠿⠿⠿⠿⠟⠿⠿⠿⠇⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠻⠿⠿⠛⠛⠛⠃
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⣠⣶⣶⣦⡀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢰⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠻⣿⣿⡿⠋⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣴⣶⣶⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣸⣿⣿⣿⣿⡄⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⢀⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣧⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⣼ trump ⣿⣆⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣠⣴⣶⣤⡀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⢰⣿⣿⣿⣿⠃⠈⢻⣿⣦⠀⠀⠀⠀⣸⣿⣿⣿⣿⣷⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠘⣿⣿⣿⡏⣴⣿⣷⣝⢿⣷⢀⠀⢀⣿⣿⣿⣿⡿⠋⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⢿⣿⣿⡿⢿⣿ scumby ⣿ ⣿⣷⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⢸⣿⣿⣇⢸⣿⣿⡟⣙⠛⠻⣿⣿⣿⣿⡇⠀⠀⠀⠀
⣴⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣠⣿⣿⡇⠙⢷⣄⠀⠈⣽⣿⣇⣀⣀⣀⠀
⠙⠻⠿⠿⠿⠿⠿⠟⠿⠿⠿⠇⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠻⠿⠿⠛⠛⠛⠃
⠀⠀⠀⣴⣾⣿⣿⣶⡄⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⢸⣿Dems⣿⣿⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠈⢿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠏⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠈⣉⣩⣀⡀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⣼⣿⣿⣿⣷⡀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⢀⣼⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡇⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⢀⣾⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣷⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⢠⣾⣿⣿⠉⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡄⠀⢀⣠⣤⣤⡀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠙⣿⣿⣧⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡇⢠⣿⣿556⣿⣧⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠈⠻⣿⣿⣟⣿⣿⣿⣷⠸⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡿⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠘⠿⢿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡄⠙⠻⠿⠿⠛⠁⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⡟⣩⣝⢿⠀⠀⣠⣶⣶⣦⡀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣷⡝⣿⣦⣠⣼⣿⣿⣽⣿⣷⡀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣿⣿⣮⢻⣿⠟⠿⢿⣿⣿⣿⣷⡀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣿⣿⣿⡇⠀⠀⠀⠈⠻⣿⣿⣿⣿⣦⡀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢰⣿⣿⣿⠇⠀⠀⠻⣿⣦⣼⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡆⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢸⣿⣿⣿⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠛⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠇⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢸⣿⣿⡿⠀⠀⠀⢀⣴⣿⣿⣿⣿⣟⣋⣁⣀⣀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠹⣻⡷⠇⠀⠀⠀⠸⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠇
That you can only post pornographic content in response to a serious issue shows that you have neither facts nor logic to offer in defense of Trump's policies.
The good news is that most of MAGA is equally unable to respond and that likely means a Democratic blowout in the midterms.
SSqrlsy’s gibberish comment was rather pornographic. On this we agree.
He posted it in response to SQRSLY which, by default, means he did it to a decidedly non-serious anything.
Damned-and-Sick is SOOOO Stupid that shit cun't even count indents! Pubic schools to day are WORSE than useless, shit seems to me, looking at the likes of Damned-and-Sick, at least!
"A serious issue."
LMAO.
Might, could, possibly. Ignore actual data. Economics by guessing.
JesseBahnFarter-Fuhrer-Grinch says BIGGER and MORE POWERFUL Government Almighty, armed with always MORE tariff-taxes, swill make us all RICH!!!
(Butt ONLY when Dear orange Caligula is Large (He is!!!) and In Charge!!!)
ALL HAIL JesseBahnFarter-Fuhrer-Grinch!!!
⠀⠀⠀⣴⣾⣿⣿⣶⡄⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⢸⣿MSM⣿⣿⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠈⢿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠏⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠈⣉⣩⣀⡀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⣼⣿⣿⣿⣷⡀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⢀⣼⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡇⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⢀⣾⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣷⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⢠⣾⣿⣿⠉⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡄⠀⢀⣠⣤⣤⣀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠙⣿⣿⣧⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡇⢠⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣧⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠈⠻⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣷⣸⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡿⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠘⠿⢿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡿⠛⠻⠿⠿⠛⠁⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⡟⣩⣝⢿⠀⠀⣠⣶⣶⣦⡀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣷⡝⣿⣦⣠⣾⣿⣿⣿⣿⣷⡀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣿⣿⣮⢻⣿⠟SSQRLSY⣷⡀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣿⣿⣿⡇⠀⠀⠀⠀⠻⣿⣿⣿⣿⣦⡀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢰⣿⣿⣿⠇⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠘⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡆⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢸⣿⣿⣿⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣠⣾⣿⣿⣿⣿⠇⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢸⣿⣿⡿⠀⠀⠀⢀⣴⣿⣿⣿⣿⣟⣋⣁⣀⣀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠹⣿⣿⠇⠀⠀⠀⠸⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠇
Nobody needs 23 kinds of toys.
What about 23 kinds of Dunkers? ENB eagerly awaits your answer.
What about 23 kinds of incorrect predictions?
In the future, predictions will be worthless.
They just need 0% tax on JUST foreign toys?
I guess on that same premise one could say, "Nobody needs domestic-made anything!"
Wonder how production-less is going to afford endless consumption?
Tariffs on toys and trinkets and textiles is a good example of Trump just imposing a regressive tax to raise revenue. There's no reshoring of that. There's no 'negotiation' deal since those tariffs are on the entire world. There's no 'pain' being imposed especially on China or the big permadeficit countitres to address those issues.
The low income target of that consumption is already in recession so the likely outcome is that those who work in crappy retail (the large employers now ) will just lose their jobs. And thus drive federal deficits higher
Sure enough, 7 minutes into the future, a worthless prediction was made.
At least the asshole didn't claim the Jews were the cause.
The more that the MAGA idiots continue to promote the Tariffs Aren't Taxes lie the more Democrats will be elected next fall.
Unfortunately, a lot of Democrats believe that loe as well.
I don't see how D's offer any alternative at all to those particular tariffs. D's are in bed with bureaucrat unions (not even real unions), academics, deep state - and their incumbents are geriatric and thoroughly corrupt. They have not moved beyond the cronyist partisan Biden 'economic plan' which resulted in zero benefits to those people now hit hard by the tariff categories mentioned (which are different from tariffs on something that might be reshored, protected, negotiated, or are a reserve/dollar/exchange/deficit issue) and who responded to the Biden BS by voting for Trump in 2024.
Is there some BS DeRp spin here? Probably. But only partisan DeRp assholes who are connected to their party's PR office in DC would advocate a vote based on that. Advocating a vote based on what is clearly no alternative at all, just makes things worse (elections that can't possibly make policy better) and reinforces all the cynicism and hatreds that prevent anything better from happening.
THANKSGIVING IN THE NEW AMERICA
Christmas? Thanksgiving has yet to arrive.
Yes, another Thanksgiving. Family. Feasting. Fun. At least, that image is the image projected onto the screens of televisions throughout America. Yet, this America is the New America. That which was no longer is . . . for better or for worse.
One sad and dangerous note relates to the diminished importance of the American family, especially among younger people. The days of Norman Rockwell have passed. Consequence? A sense of alienation and isolation.
Turkey and family have become symbols of the past. "Fast food" and "social media" are symbols of the present. The future? Ask, perhaps, the foremost American philosopher, Yogi Berra:
“The future isn’t what it used to be.”
https://www.nationonfire.com/thanksgiving/ .
Boo fucking hoo.
That's about the level of verbalization reasoning that defeated, unable, soon to be replaced right-wing misfires are capable of.
Only out-done by pointless leftard trolling. Misery loves company?
Blah, Blah, Blah.
Another boring political hit job by Eric Boehm.
Understanding that centralized planning fails because it is way to complex to account for all the nuance to make accurate predictions anywhere as close as a billion personal decisions, UNLESS there is the opportunity to SLAM Trump and then we know every nuance and detail and everything is so obvious and without any surprises.
What a hypocritical partisan hack. The truth is that we really don't know what the ramifications will be for the tariffs and will not know for quite some time potentially years. There are way too many variables, attributes and nuance to know what will be the true ramifications.
I'm not advocating for tariffs, but I do recognize the blow-hard arguments as being more partisan based than principled.
You are absolutely advocating for - any action that Trump (or for that matter any action that any Prez takes if you are honest about not being partisan) takes because the ramifications of any possible consequences are so far in the future that action taken now can't possibly be judged for years or even decades.
So in the meantime, one must give the benefit of the doubt to action - as opposed to the benefit of the doubt for INaction.
Dear Santa,
For Christmas, I would like some Chinese toys. Made by slaves.
NOT ELVES.
SLAVES.
THEY MUST BE MADE BY SLAVES OR I DON'T WANT THEM. THE COMMUNIST SUFFERING IS PART OF THE GIFT.
1. You're on the naughty list, so Santa ain't listening.
2. The only gift you should be asking for, once eligible, is for a new brain; one that understands comprehensive, rational discourse and isn't a complete imbecile. No elves even necessary.
The folks on the naughty list get their gifts from China. Made by slaves.
Given California's goverment created energy price surges, I would like coal for christmas
All the greedy coastal-importing [D]emon-rats cry because they got a bill for all their welfare handouts.
Still struggling with basic knowledge on how account balancing works.
Think a single one of them will think twice the next time they vote for more handouts?
Taking bets they'll just stick their thumb under the hammer again and cry later about it.
Blaming everyone else for their own stupidity and insisting it's all those 'icky' domestic-makers fault.