Zohran Mamdani's $5 Billion Corporate Tax Hike Threatens NYC's Status as the World's Financial Capital
Billions of dollars are at stake in New York City’s mayoral election.
Zohran Mamdani has put forth many bold—and expensive—proposals in his New York City mayoral bid, including childcare for all, government-run grocery stores, and free buses. He's planning to pay for these proposals with various tax hikes, including a large jump in the city's corporate tax rate from 7.5 percent to 11.5 percent. He claims this will bring in $5 billion, and says New York City's economy can "afford to support a stronger public sector."
Unfortunately, raising the corporate tax rate could also hinder the job market, cause corporations to relocate, and decrease long-term government revenue, potentially damaging New York's status as the financial capital of the world.
Corporations hit with higher tax rates would seek ways to cut costs, possibly harming workers through either layoffs or lower wages. Particularly in New York City, where corporations employ hundreds of thousands of workers, even modest cost cutting measures are bound to negatively impact the nearly 5 million local workers. In the United Kingdom, for example, around one in six British companies cut hiring in the fourth quarter of 2024 in anticipation of tax hikes that took place in April 2025. If New York employees aren't directly laid off, they could face lower wages in the long run. Approximately 28 percent of the cost of higher corporate taxes is taken on by workers in the form of lower wages, further exemplifying the harsh effect that corporate tax hikes have on workers. Corporate tax hikes are generally never a good idea—even more so in a weak labor market where the national unemployment rate is the highest since the pandemic and job growth has consistently underperformed in the past few months.
Some corporations will also deem the tax hikes as too imposing to pay altogether, forcing them into relocation to another city, state, or even country where they can operate with lower costs. Already, the exodus of banks from Wall Street to corporate tax havens, such as Elliot Management's relocation to Florida, has cost the city millions in managed assets. New York City simply cannot afford to watch other businesses follow. Already, New York has an estimated budget gap of $4.22 billion in 2026, and a massive $8.83 billion gap is projected for 2027.
Consider the possible damages. The U.S. Chamber of Commerce recently estimated the economic effects of a mere one percentage point increase in the federal corporate income tax rate from 21 percent to 22 percent. That increase would cost New York's 10th congressional district, home to the Financial District and southwest Brooklyn, approximately $1.3 billion over 10 years. The rest of the city would be harmed too, of course—yet Mamdani proposes an even more drastic increase of four percentage points. "Businesses have only three options to pay for higher taxes: raise prices; reduce costs; or lower returns to investors," as the authors of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce report wrote. "In reality, they do all three." The fourth option, one even more feasible if a tax hike only hits New York City, is that businesses will flee.
New York City's economy cannot afford higher corporate taxes. All of America benefits from the city's status as the financial center of the world. Mamdani's proposed tax policies would threaten that reign.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please to post comments
Those supporting progtopia will be pulling the temple down on themselves with things like this. It will be glorious.
If NYC has been socialist for a while (as we hear from many), how come it has also been the financial capital of anything?
You are particularly dense, 0.00.
So far, the owners of those businesses haven't had to pay to the extent which will likely cause them to move.
BTW, please add 1 and 1, and tell us what you get.
Hint: There is a distance between "one" and "eleventy hundred" or whatever passes for a big number to imbeciles like you.
Because Wall Street predates that. And now given that technology has rendered location near meaningless, get ready for the mass exodus. Just look at Hollywood. Democrat policies are steadily driving the entertainment community out of California.
Speaking of supporting progtopia……
https://www.jns.org/kristol-backs-mamdani-heritage-head-defends-carlson-fuentes/
So is Kristol joining the Social Democrats? Or is John Brennan getting him into CPUSA?
As has been pointed out elsewhere, Marxists were very much on the same side as Khomeini when he took over Iran. They frequently do asinine things, especially when they plan on making sure they never have to leave power.
I hope he wins! New York will get exactly what they voted for.
Just for the record:
The Miami office vacancy rate was 12.8% in September 2025.
Oh, yeah, I forgot.
They employees of the companies that move from NYC to Miami will not pay state or local income taxes.
Sad.
But Wait!
There's More!
NYC experiences much lower temperatures, especially in winter, with average lows in January around 29F and rare occurrences below 14F, while Miami's average low in the coldest month is about 60F and it rarely drops below 50F.
(and in the summer, Miami has this neat thing called air conditioning)
And the other neat thing called humidity!
Which air conditioners reduce.
NYC is plenty humid in summer. Plus you have all the crime, and Marxism.
NYC is one of the safest big cities in America, with a murder rate substantially less than the State of Florida's. Giuliani (1994-2002) and Bloomberg (2002-2014) brought NYC's crime way down. De Blasio (2014-2022) left well enough alone in his first term, but let crime grow after the BLM riots of 2020. Adams (2022-2026) brought crime down again.
FALSE. In 2023 the murder rate in NYC was 5.8/100k, and in Florida 4.71.
I'm sure the rest of your BS is false as well. NYC is a crime-ridden hell-hole.
"All of America benefits from the city's status as the financial center of the world."
I call bullshit.
The electrons don't care where they originate.
Libertarians for skimming domestic profits.
More local stories please! Why does a city with 2% of the U.S. population get 80% of the local coverage here? Does it have anything to do with Reason's regionalistic hiring practices? Because God knows, the most libertarian thinkers in America all live in Manhattan.
As one of the 75% of Americans who don't live in a coastal state, allow me to share with you how little we all care if The Big Crapple catches on fire and falls into the sea. Reap, sow, crash, burn.
Look who is not getting invited to the upper midtown cocktail parties.
Thank Christ.
But then you wouldn’t get to see shrike eat bing cherries that Dave Wiegel had shoved up his butt.
Where else will you get French wine?
There is no French wine. Only tariffs.
Sacre bleu!
Hon! Hon Hon!
Yeah all of these dire warnings are getting pretty tedious. NYC will get what it deserves and the financial center won't disappear it will just be somewhere else. Chicago elected one of the worst mayors in history in Lori Lightfoot and when she bailed they doubled down on stupid and elected Brandon. I predict NYC will follow the same path and things will only get worse. If anyone thinks that can't happen take a look at Detroit.
People like Madani are creeping in around the country. So America better get on board with Neo McCarthyism, or things are going to get very bad.
Because 80% of Reason staffers live there.
Which explains all the global Neo Marxism trying to masquerade as libertarianism. most recent hires show Reason is becoming blatantly Marxist.
Not for long.
And I'm not talking about them moving out.
Being able to identify a problem is not remotely the same as being able to fix it. Candidate Trump pre 2016 correctly identified a few problems facing the US, from issues arising out of globalisation, to the willingness of the US to go to war. Few non-Trumpists will think he has solved them.
And thus with Mamdani. Yes, there are problems all over NYC, from rent to transport, etc. But his proposed solutions may exacerbate the problems. You don't fix housing supply by penalising landlords, for example. Raising tax rates on corporations sounds "pleasant" but particularly when a workforce is now far more mobile than it was, it's all too easy for companies simply to move much of their business out of NYC - which will have knock-on effects like lower tax revenues both corporate and from incomes, and less money spent within NYC.
All economic/political models incorporate implicit models of human behaviour. Mamdani's model, in effect, assumes that the people who run corporations will behave as if working in NYC is more important than P&L to the corporations' shareholders. This is unlikely to be true.
Also, centralised planning doesn't work when you're dealing with more than about 180 people. Mamdani is a central plannista.
Who has recieved funds from your favorite billionaire to push these policies. Will shrike notice?
Shrike is jealous that Mamdani has been anointed Soros’s bug eating familiar and not him.
I can't answer for shrike, not being him despite what the fat Arizona Nazi has claimed.
Nazis don’t reduce the size and scope of government. They hated Jews though. Your part doesn’t want to reduce the size and scope of government, and you guys really hate Jews.
So really, you are a LOT closer to being a Nazi than Jesse ever could be. So maybe you should avoid pulling on that thread.
My party? Which party is that? I am registered independent, and would not vote for Mamdani in a million years - as my post should make clear. Also, as a Jew I'm pretty good at spotting who hates us - and the hate is seen from both right and left, though the right has been more successful at killing us than the left, in the US.
And to think that Trump is somehow reducing the government, when he's created goon squads, is trying to convert the NG to a paramilitary force, bombing civilians with a "trust us" rationalisation. replacing patriots in the forces and the DoJ with Trump loyalists - easy to see who's moving in the direction of Nazism and who supports the move.
I don’t know what you consider “the right”, but actual conservatives have been consistently pro Jewish. Myself included. Which should be obvious to anyone here.
And I don’t care how your registered. That doesn’t mean anything. It’s obvious you vote primarily vote democrat. Just like it’s obvious that I don’t.
A TDS-addled slimy pile of lying shit compares Trump to Mamdani and wants us to believe he's NOT a TDS-addled slimy pile of lying shit!
Show of hands, please.
https://psychcentral.com/disorders/treating-pedophilia#ssr-is
Not relevant to me, as I'm not a pedo. The fat Arizona Nazi said I was shrike despite providing no evidence; and my providing counter evidence didn't seem to stop him and some others repeating the allegation. either because you lot are incapable of thinking for yourselves, or because you're stupid, or because you find it pleasurably trolling, or some combo thereof.
Differences:
Shrike: American, apparently a pedo
SRG2: originally and still culturally British, not a pedo.
Now fuck off.
Fat Arizona Nazi? I wasn’t aware Chemjeff lived in Arizona.
Yeah ok there Ronald McFondled.
https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/services/health-services-benefits/medical-assistance-dying.html
One of SF's resident congress-critters, some years ago, claimed that corporations would not move HQs out of SF, since it's 'so attractive'. No 'journalist' has yet to make her eat those words, but PG&E, Wells Fargo, AT&T, X and several others have decided the stock-holders' benefits were more important.
No sympathy for the c-suits.
Doubly so for his rich funders.
Triply so for any Jew that votes for him.
How hard is it for a corporation to "move"? JP Morgan - chase already has more employees in Texas than New York. Is moving the corporate location as simple as filing some paperwork? Would doing this save/avoid the Taxes? Or do they have to actually move a significant number of employees?
They can just file the paperwork. Which is probably a bit of an undertaking for a company of that size.
There may be less tangible reasons they’ve held out thus far.
In the case of JPM, they recently moved into a purpose-built office building on Park Avenue and they may be reluctant to vacate it too soon...
I like to think of it as... congestion pricing for corporations.
Goal: Reduce corporations
Solution: Tax corporations
Result: ???
Regardless, it's 187% libertarian!
"Regardless, it's 187% libertarian!"
Bullshit.
No they don't. Mamdani can do nothing by himself.
It is the people who will vote for him, those are the people who threaten. They want this.
And most of them are not native born. Probably a lot of them are illegals.
Much doodoo (bullshit) about nada, as the state legislature is unlikely to pass this corporate tax hike
The municipal tax on billionaires, of whom there ar!e 350,000 in NNC will be a 2% hike on the top 1%......big whoop!
1
Wealthy individuals and companies have been relocating from higher tax states for decades. The numbers of affluent people residing in and companies located in Florids have skyrocketed, and yet these same people and companies still have high end residences, significant business activities, or both in New York City, Long Island, Connecticut, north Jersey suburbs, etc. Most of these fled-from places are economically as strong as ever.
COVID taught us that actually being physically on hell island isn't necessary to doing business in New York.
Hence why their commercial real estate market has taken a dump.
Oh, noes! Light the match and set your hair on fire because a MAGA author is creating a straw man!!
NEW YORK CITY NEEDS PERMISSION FROM THE NEW YORK STATE LEGISLATURE TO RAISE ITS CORPORATE INCOME TAX RATE
New York State retains ultimate legal authority over its municipalities, including New York City, and determines the taxing powers they possess. New York City does not have the inherent power to set its own income or corporate taxes; these taxes are essentially state laws, limited in jurisdiction to the city, and administered by the state's Department of Taxation and Finance.
Any proposal by New York City's mayor or City Council to change the corporate tax rate must be introduced as a bill and passed by the State Legislature and signed by the Governor. This control dates back in part to the city's 1975 financial crisis, when state oversight of city finances was significantly strengthened.
Consider what a gutless bunch of pussies democrat legislators are, they will likely cave in to whatever this grinning Marxist/Islamist idiot demands.
Probably not - Albany is significantly more conservative than NYC
So more Leninist than Stalinist?
Unfortunately, raising the corporate tax rate could also hinder the job market, cause corporations to relocate, and decrease long-term government revenue, potentially damaging New York's status as the financial capital of the world.
You realize that's his goal, right?