Singapore Keeps Hanging Low-Level Drug Couriers, But It Can't Execute Its Way to a Drug-Free Society
The Singaporean government hanged Pannir Selvam this month, the 10th convict to be executed in 2025 for nonviolent narcotics violations.

When I met Angelia Pranthaman and her brother Joshua in Singapore two years ago, they were still cheerful and upbeat. They had a couple of hours to kill before their bus back to Malaysia, a long journey they undertook as often as they could to visit their brother Pannir Selvam.
Growing up in a Christian, Indian-Malaysian family, Pannir's five brothers and sisters remember him as a playful, naughty boy who was always getting into trouble, but also a talented musician who played drums and guitar at their local church.
"He's also a bathroom singer: He always sings when he's in the shower, Malay songs," Angelia reminisced with a smile. "He'd put on his music, and the entire house would go boom-boom-boom!"

Like many Malaysians, Pannir crossed into Singapore for work. He often spent his earnings drinking or gambling, but he always kept in touch with his family. Until one night in 2014, he stopped picking up the phone.
"Pannir doesn't listen to everyone," said Joshua, in his slightly gruff voice. "He chooses people to listen to—one of these people is my sister Sangkari."
"About three or four days, she couldn't reach him. Usually, if he is busy working, maybe at night or the next day, he will call back," added Angelia.
Unable to reach him, they called the house where Pannir was staying. No one there had seen him either. Eventually they reached a friend of their father, a pastor living in Singapore, who told them he'd seen Pannir on TV. He'd been arrested at the Woodlands border checkpoint with bags containing 51 grams of heroin strapped to his groin and hidden under the seat of his motorbike.
In Singapore, anything over 15 grams of heroin triggers an automatic death sentence. For the next 11 years, his family could only see him for an hour at a time through a glass panel.
When we met, Angelia told me her brother was "tired."
"It was almost nine years, and at one point he told my sister that he's OK with everything, you know, he's ready to go," Angelia remembered. "He's tired of being locked down; no communication, no sunlight, no friends, no family, no love….But we believe there is still some energy keeping him alive, keeping him sharp."
Even on death row, Pannir kept himself busy, reading books and composing songs. Upon hearing of my Russian background, Angelia delighted in telling me he'd been reading Dostoevsky.
His final appeal was rejected in September. Just after dawn on October 8, guards led him from his cell in Singapore's Changi Prison to a room where a specially measured noose was fastened around his neck, the knot precisely placed behind his ear to make sure his spine snapped when the trapdoor opened beneath his feet. Gravity did the rest. At 9 a.m., his family arrived to collect his lifeless body. He was 38 years old.
Skyscrapers and high-rises light up the skyline of Singapore, a wealthy city-state off the southeast tip of Malaysia. Crime is rare: only 10 murders last year among 6 million people, roughly the same population as Missouri. There are no shantytowns or homeless encampments. There is no opioid crisis. While their neighbors suffer poverty, strife, and unrest, Singaporeans are well-off and live comfortable lives—the Switzerland of Southeast Asia. It's multiethnic and multicultural, although the Chinese, at three-quarters of the population, are dominant. The city is clean, modern, and cosmopolitan.

So it's jarring to see such medieval punishments. And yet the government argues that it's dealing with drugs so decisively that keeps Singapore so safe. That argument has won sympathy in the White House.
"China, Singapore—actually, there are quite a few, many in Asia, where they have the death penalty," President Donald Trump told a meeting of governors in February. "There's no drug problem whatsoever."
Pannir was the 12th convict to be executed this year—10 of them for nonviolent narcotics violations. The very fact that those couriers keep getting caught suggests there's a consistent demand that's profitable enough for these poor saps to risk their lives.
Singapore is a police state. With its citizenry under near-constant surveillance—more than 110,000 cameras monitor the city—not to mention the threat of having your bare buttocks lashed by a rattan cane as if you were a naughty Victorian schoolboy, it's hard to imagine how a hippie-like subculture could ever develop. And yet the presence of stoner metal bands such as Marijannah (a play on words: marijannah means "come to paradise" in Malay) suggests otherwise.
"I think we're the same as anyplace else, my brother," says M.F., a young man familiar with Singapore's underground drug scene. He asked to be identified by those initials because he has just finished 14 months' confinement and doesn't want to screw up his probation. "It's really just what's more available to whom and what's not, based on who you know and what you can afford to get. For example, cocaine and the much-better-quality weed is available, but it's priced way higher and a little harder to get if you don't have the right contacts."
Party drugs like ecstasy, ketamine, and meth are also not uncommon in the underground gay scene (Singapore outlawed sex between men until late 2022).
"The bulk of the people you'd see in prison are usually in for meth and heroin," M.F. continues. "Weed is common enough here as well, but a lot of people fear smoking weed especially, because the idea is that it stays in your system longer, which proves detrimental if the pigs are ever out to get you."
Much as in Russia, dope is sometimes sold over secret chats in the Telegram app, with the goods delivered to dead drops, perhaps hidden behind a drainage pipe. But there are other ways to score.
"You have your friendly neighborhood plugs—your friend who knows a friend who knows a friend," says M.F. "You could always head down to the red-light district and try your luck, but there you'll have a better chance with Class Cs [the least strict drug category] because the place is swarming with undercover and regular patrol pigs, and nobody wants a drug trafficking charge."
As an occasional toker and psychonaut, M.F. had prior run-ins with the law. After spending some time in the Drug Rehabilitation Centre (DRC)—Singapore's spartan, prison-like mandatory rehab—he stopped smoking for a while. But after a sports injury placed him on medical leave, no longer having to attend court-mandated urine tests, he tossed out the hospital's meds and switched back to blunts.
"Helped with the pain, helped with the depression that came with the whole ordeal, helped with my appetite, helped with a whole lot," he says. "And also, I missed getting stoned and I just wanted to smoke. I would happily get blazed in peace and remained a productive, contributing member of society if the fucking government would stop putting me in their man-made hell for it, claiming it's for the best of me and the country."
After recovering, M.F. started taking urine tests again. They came up clean until one day, his probation officer pulled him aside and demanded a hair sample for analysis. He had no choice: Refusing could land him two years in Changi. (Refusing a urine test can be punished by 10 years.) Three months later, the Central Narcotics Bureau (CNB), Singapore's drug squad, came knocking.
"Fifteen to 20 cops raid my home, put me in cuffs, and bring me back to the station," he recalls. "I'm told that the results are out, and they could see that I used drugs in the period of my medical leave. Mind you, this was half-a-year ago by the time they wanted to charge me for it….It didn't matter to them that I've been clean and reporting weekly for the last couple months."
For all their faults, American cops generally respect Miranda rights. In Singapore, there's no such thing.
"The usual practice in Singapore is that when you are questioned by the police, you don't/can't have a lawyer with you," says the Singaporean journalist and activist Kirsten Han. "This is the same whether you're being interviewed for some innocuous infraction or if you're being questioned for an offense that might turn out to be a capital charge….There's not a lot of transparency into how the Central Narcotics Bureau conducts its investigations, and there's a lack of an independent oversight mechanism that can investigate complaints or check on police behaviour. That said, we sometimes see CNB officers get in trouble, like in 2022 when an officer was convicted of using violence to extort a confession."
There is little freedom of speech in Singapore. Han's coalition—the Transformative Justice Collective, which works to reform the city-state's criminal justice system—is regularly hounded by the authorities.

After pleading guilty and serving 14 months in the DRC, M.F. is now at a halfway house for six months, after which he'll complete the remainder of his three-year sentence under house arrest. Even after that, he'll have to report to the CNB for up to five years. All for getting high.
"All in all, I will be under the watchful eye of the government for the next seven years. That's eight years in total if you include my recent stint in prison…and this is just what's on paper," he grumbled. "Funny thing is that, in the rehab classes I'm made to sit through, they have one lesson where they wish to let you know that slips and relapses are normal in your journey as a drug addict fuck-up, so don't beat yourself up over it happening. I bring my case up with my group counsellor, asking, 'Hey, if this is the case, and this is what the government tells us, then why lock me up and make me do this three-year sentence if I've evidently picked myself up, cleaned up, and have had things going so good for me with [work] and family and all? Now shit is bad again.' My counsellor tells me, 'I don't know, and I completely understand and agree with what you're saying. But all I know is this is the lesson plan I'm told to conduct.'"
The extreme consequences of failing sobriety standards drive drugs deep underground. In 2007, the 19-year-old art student Felicia Teo died after allegedly taking ecstasy with two friends, who burnt and buried her body so as to not be charged themselves. Her family had no idea what happened to her until 13 years later, when a skeleton found on the outskirts of town tested positive for a partial match. As opposition politician Kenneth Jeyaretnam pointed out, none of this might have happened had her friends felt safe calling an ambulance.
It wasn't always this way. When the British established Singapore as a trading outpost in 1819, opium was among the gifts that the city's founder, the colonial officer Stamford Raffles, offered the local Malay sultan. Back then, there was no particular taboo around such psychoactive substances. Raw opium, imported from overseas, was processed into a smokable form known as chandu, which became popular among Chinese laborers. Westernized Chinese reformers pushed for prohibition, but they didn't get very far: The 1907 Opium Committee found the evils of opium to be greatly exaggerated, and the island's newspaper of record, The Straits Times, railed against the hypocrisy of campaigning against opium but not whiskey or beer.
The city's appearance changed dramatically after World War II, its old colonial buildings replaced by skyscrapers and shopping malls. The government's attitude toward narcotics changed dramatically too: In 1951, the Dangerous Drugs Ordinance outlawed cannabis, cocaine, and opiates. Although Singapore inherited capital punishment from British colonial rule, it wasn't yet imposed for breaking psychoactive taboos. Instead, getting caught with a banned substance would earn you a spell in mandatory rehab.
But panic spread in the early '70s, when heroin arrived on the scene. Fearing a junkie infestation and prioritizing social order above all else, the authorities tightened the laws, culminating in the 1973 Misuse of Drugs Act. Drug abuse switched from being seen as a Chinese problem to one of ethnic Malays corrupted by decadent Western culture. Two years later, the law was amended to include capital punishment.
Today, at a time when nearly nine out of 10 Americans want marijuana legalization in some form, Singapore will march you to the gallows for as little as half a kilogram of cannabis.
Drug convicts form just under half of the incarcerated population. While Singapore has stopped releasing statistics on their ethnic or national origin, anecdotal evidence suggests the inmates are disproportionately—if not predominantly—either foreigners or minorities, chiefly Indian or Malay.
"Very roughly, I think about a fifth of the death row population in Singapore are Malaysian nationals, and the rest are Singaporean citizens," says Han. "People on death row tend to come from ethnic minority groups and/or working-class backgrounds—basically people who have been historically excluded, who struggle to make ends meet, who might not have access to opportunities like other people, and are therefore particularly vulnerable to being recruited into the drug trade."
According to Angelia, Pannir was recruited by a man, a fellow Indian, who befriended him at a gambling den and convinced him to carry the drugs. On paper, the law permits commuting death to life imprisonment if a lowly courier co-operates with the investigation. In practice, this was denied to Pannir, even though he'd provided police with intel on his former bosses. It's mainly small-time mules like him who are executed, not the masterminds.
A week later, another smuggler, Hamzah Ibrahim, was hanged, despite likewise co-operating with authorities.
Experts have long questioned the reliability of official data supposedly proving that Singapore is winning the drug war. Studies comparing murder rates between jurisdictions with and without the death penalty fail to find a correlation. Singapore's safety and incredibly low crime rates can also be attributed to other factors—its wealth, for one.
There are no rehabs except the DRC, and no one will publicly admit partaking in drugs: By law, even doctors are obliged to alert the authorities of their drug-addled patients. Thus, Singapore only records "drug abusers" who have come into contact with the system. Arrest figures are small compared to other countries, but that doesn't account for those who haven't been busted. Since Singapore lacks a Skid Row, a lot can happen behind closed doors.
But even the data we do have show the number of detained drug users steadily rising, especially among youth under 20. If demand didn't exist, smugglers wouldn't regularly risk their lives muling their product into the country.
Singaporeans sometimes suggest that drug reformers have a colonial mindset. Drug-fuelled hedonism is (no longer) in their culture, they say, so who are meddling outsiders to tell them what to do?
But on the evening of October 7, Han and hundreds of other supporters held a candlelight vigil for Pannir. Since Hong Lim Park, the only place in the entire city where unsanctioned protest is permitted, was booked out for the week, they had to gather in private or online. They were as Singaporean as founding father Lee Kuan Yew himself, and they wore T-shirts and carried signs reading "NOT IN MY NAME." All pushing back because their government was killing a low-level drug transporter.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
This is a weird article.
1. You can never fully eliminate drug use - this you should never try?
2. Yet it admits that Singapore is clean and safe. Is this because of the harsh punishment? Who knows, but contrasting with other countries it's either that or general culture - which the acceptance of the death penalty is part of.
3. I thought other countries were allowed to do what they wanted - only the US has to be an open borders tolerate everything society?
The few videos I have seen smuggled out of North Korea also show it to be clean. Immaculate even. Am guessing narcotics consumption is also frowned upon there.
I mean, there are always choices and you can choose to accept some bad consequences along with greater freedom.
But the article doesn't want to admit that if you can get people to agree on giving up that freedom you can actually make inroads on those bad consequences.
Every place makes these tradeoffs. I've been to Singapore, I don't know if I want to live there but its pretty clear that the way I want to live my life would run into very few of the boundaries on acceptable behavior they have.
For other people it would be different.
End the welfare state and there would be increased pressure to not be a pajama-wearing layabout that plays xbox all day when not consuming drugs.
Singapore could learn something from Seattle...
Libertarians never supported tyranny. The US doesn't tolerate hard drugs or prostitution.
Singapore should be free to adjudicate what it has determined.
In the US, the victimless act of drug use should not be illegal. The law making that so should also immediately eliminate all forms of govt welfare.
illegal is one thing, the death penalty? Ridiculous.
A team D guy in North Carolina just tore down a Trump sign then fired a few shots at the guy that put it up.
A few months ago, a conservative debater was assassinated by a trantifa thing because of his views.
There are daily shootings a murders in large US cities.
There are currently millions of illegal alien rapefugees in the US.
The US is $37,923,905,522,183.00 in debt, excluding unfunded mandates which are higher than that.
I’m not so worried about what Singapore does in Singapore.
Was recently in Asia for a bit but didn’t travel to that country. It is important when traveling to another place to check the local laws and customs. They usually have warnings for western travelers available online in English (the international travel language).
The lesson here is that we should be executing Marxists.
Get rid of the democrats. Our country is worth far more than their ‘collective’ lives.
All laws are, ultimately, enforced through killing.
At the end of the day, the government is willing and allowed to kill you over every law, no matter how minor.
Singapore is just streamlining the process for some crimes.
If the laws only concerned actions involving coercion that would be fine.
whycome other countries not be like us?
Don't worry. Trump will emulate them soon enough. When he does you and the rest of his defenders will say it's ok to murder suspected drug dealers without charges let alone a trial. Oh, wait. He already did. And you already did. Never mind.
Your analysis is always so welcome Ms. Maddow.
True libertarians support death to drug dealers, preferably without messy things like charges, trials, or any of that other due process nonsense. Anyone who disagrees is a leftist Marxist with TDS.
false
You defend murder on the high seas and claim to be a true libertarian.
False.
Is this a you statement, telling people what they think?
Oh yeah, youre a hypocrite.
Disneyland with the death penalty, baby.
https://web.archive.org/web/20230512163736/https://www.wired.com/1993/04/gibson-2/
Singapore is a relentlessly G-rated experience, micromanaged by a state that has the look and feel of a very large corporation. If IBM had ever bothered to actually possess a physical country, that country might have had a lot in common with Singapore. There's a certain white-shirted constraint, an absolute humorlessness in the way Singapore Ltd. operates; conformity here is the prime directive, and the fuzzier brands of creativity are in extremely short supply.
So it's what your country would look like if it was run by Jack Dorsey.
Singapore is an awesome place.
Sadly, given human nature, tough punishments is what keeps it that way.
You can be arrested for having a pack of gum. And hung for having a big bag of weed.
Sorry but Amsterdam is also an awesome place.
Amsterdam is an awesome place - as long as you get away from Amsterdam and all the stoned foreigners pissing in the streets.
Now, if you think being stoned and pissing in the streets is awesome - sure, go to Amsterdam.
Other people don't like that and they go to Singapore. Where they are in no danger of being hung for being caught stoned, pissing in the streets.
Not sure why you tried to turn this into hate for drug users post?
Suggesting that Singapore does not have drug users visit there is naive. The pissing on the streets thing, happens in most places and I never witnessed that in Holland, which is clean by the way.
? Singapore has the death penalty for having a bag of weed so yes, you are in danger there.
You can be fined or even jailed for bringing a pack of chewing gum into the country. And yes for pissing in the streets it's a $1000 - $2000 fine and potential thrown in jail.
These laws are enforced by the National Environmental Agency...
Experts have long questioned the reliability of official data supposedly proving that Singapore is winning the drug war. Studies comparing murder rates between jurisdictions with and without the death penalty fail to find a correlation. Singapore's safety and incredibly low crime rates can also be attributed to other factors—its wealth, for one.
No, it's low crime rates are not coming from its "wealth". Learn something about the world. Lots of wealthy nations suffer from high crime rates. Would you consider Chicago to be a 'wealthy' city? It ranks 40th in the world for murder. When you consider the relative 'wealth' of other cities around the globe, Chicago shouldn't be anywhere near '40th' in the world for murder rate.
No, the reason Singapore's crime rate is low is probably due to cultural factors which are difficult to quantify.
For instance, former Reason alum Michael Moynihan once pointed out that if you took a dump truck and poured out 200 glock pistols in an intersection in Amsterdam in the middle of the night, 190 of them would be returned to police by 9am the next morning. During most of my younger life, this was also how other Scandinavian countries were described, including Sweden. However, those conditions are changing rapidly. Scenes like this would have been unheard of in Sweden until only a few years ago.
This is quite sad really.
Why would the people pay taxes to have someone on death row for years because of heroin when the person probably would have died on their own because of heroin?
Wealth? The biggest drug addicts are some of the wealthiest people... They can afford to keep it quiet and hidden usually until they die.
They have low crime because they have Authoritarian law enforcement presence and a high level of surveillance.
Because until then they'll commit crimes to support their habit, annoy other people with panhandling, shitting in the street, and sleeping in doorways, then they'll die in an alley and have to be carted off.
Look, there are already places that do what you want. Leave the Singaporeans to 'be horrible'.
I don't see you whining about how China treats Uighurs. You don't whine about how North Korea treats drug users. You aren't concerned about Africans genociding each other.
But here is an otherwise prosperous city and all you can do is cry 'barbarous!'
Because until then they'll commit crimes to support their habit, annoy other people with panhandling, shitting in the street, and sleeping in doorways, then they'll die in an alley and have to be carted off.
I've always found this to be a weak argument. Those CRIMES they commit to support their habit are already CRIMES. The problem is not enforcing the laws against private property violations, panhandling, shitting in the streets, and harassment, not to mention actual violent crimes. Or when they're arrested for any of those crimes, Soros DAs and leftists in the justice system drop felonies down to misdemeanors or don't prosecute at all.
Legalize (not decriminalize) drugs and PROSECUTE for actual crimes with victims. Don't go the shitlib Portland way of decriminalizing drugs (which keeps the black market) and de facto and de jure decriminalization of actual crimes.
As far as Singapore goes, I disagree with the death penalty for low-level drug crimes, but they're a sovereign nation. It's not the call of the US to make them change.
^ This +9000
I am not whining about anything and certainly while I am judging giving the death penalty for drugs or any non violent crime, Singapore can and will do as it has and will regardless of my or your opinion.
As for the rest of your rant, maybe find some Vaseline to help get that stick out of your ass? Your assumptions are completely unfounded.
If you are trying to make a case to increase law enforcement in America to deal with the issues then say so. I agree, the streets should be safer, but killing drug users with the death penalty is not the answer.
Because until then they'll commit crimes to support their habit
My reading of the story was that he became a mule to support his alcohol and gambling habits. It's documented that he drank and gambled in or to excess. There's no evidence he was a heroin user and 51g is a lot for strictly personal use. He wasn't part of some liberty or civil unrest uprising.
Ultimately, there's a very valid argument to be made that the reason he chose smuggling over, e.g., burgling a house is because the risk/reward was better for heroin. Notably, this means that if you legalize heroin and the price does go down, burglary or theft is just as viable an option to support his habits.
This, of course, doesn't mean every drug user is a thief. As indicated, there are other narratives about controlled, harmless, personal use that were ruled out. It does, however, demonstrate that the idea of "just legalize everything" solving the problem is like the "just buy everyone a house" solution to homelessness.
Have you been to Singapore? There laws are authoritarian, but their law enforcement is anything but. Most the cops you see are wearing white gloves and guiding traffic.
US police forces definitely behave way more authoritarian. Not a lot of jackbooted cops dressed like the military in Singapore. They look more like Andy Griffith.
The reason Singapore is low on crime is that the penalties are so incredibly harsh that nobody in their right mind comits crime. You think about jaywalking, and you are like, "hell no, not worth it"
Its an incredibly safe country and comfortable to walk around with zero risk. I would never want to live there, but I have spent several months there for work and found it the most fascinating country on earth, specifically in how they handle sociological issues. They defintiely are authoritarian on surveillance, speech and crime and punishment, but oddly less authoritarian on enforcement procedures. The handful of cops I have encountered have never felt even remotely threatening, which is not something I can say for the US.
Definitely not libertarian by any stretch, but honestly its good to see some different styles of governance to see what works and what doesn't. And if you want to see a country where deterrence actually is working, its fascinating. Harsh punishments for crimes that harm others are not necessarily antithetical to libertarian principals. It's that Singapore doesn't consider gum chewing a victimless crime...
It is one thing to say it's not a desired state of affairs but you can't say it doesn't work even if you don't know precisely why. Same goes for El Salvador. We could solve most crime by locking up/executing the sub 5% of the population committing most crimes, no due process involved, but we won't.
Most people think murder is bad and are in favor of strong laws against it, but people still commit murders. Should we then stop enforcing harsh penalties?
Singapore has a very low violent crime rate.
It is truly a shining example for the world!
It's also one of the world's least corrupt countries, so you can generally count on government to perform the way it says it will. Maybe the bargain isn't to your taste, but at least it's steady and predictable.
It is said that Toronto is New York run by the Swiss, and Singapore is New York run by the Gestapo. I don't entirely disagree.
You mean the Gestapo that doesn't murder millions of Jews or invade other sovereign nations?
It's a tiny country. You can walk out in less than a day. I have not heard of any emigration restrictions. Why doesn't a person just leave if he finds the laws not to his liking? It's not like the government conceals its laws. A country that will have one jailed, beaten, or hanged if one steps out of line in the slightest should not have much hold on any freedom loving person. Just don't sell your soul for the nice income and then be surprised when the government comes to collect.
Give me a break, it's Singapore - a wonderful place where you get caned for spitting out your gum on the sidewalk. It's never been libertarian and it never will, so stick to the United States, please.
Hang enough of them, and eventually they'll all quit being drug criminals.
As a small l libertarian that works in the International District in Seattle, and who has spent several months in Singapore, I am conflicted on Singapore.
There is ZERO doubt in my mind that Singapore is as crime free as it is specifically because of their extremely harsh penalties are a deterrent. Riding a bicycle without a headlight will get you 6 months in prison, hence nobody thinks it is ever worth riding a bicycle without a headlight. You'd have to be a moron to do so.
On the other hand Singapore is a surveillance state that monitors literally everything and they outlaw being critical of the govt. They also ban anything with even the tiniest amount of societal harm. I mean is chewing gum really that big of a problem to society?
But the drug prosecutions are where I am most conflicted. I walk among fentanyl zombies every day. I can't count how many dead bodies I have walked past, because I honestly don't know if they are dead, and I am not risking my own safety to check on every unconscious human I see in a day, that would be several dozen. So I am of the firm believer that unchecked drug usage creates a massive societal harm, with direct victims and should not go unchecked. So for that I say, good on Singapore, keep on executing. They give you PLENTY of notice before entering the country that it is a capital offense. Seattle, which is a bit smaller than Singapore had over 1000 overdose deaths last year. Many if not most of those were dead people on the sidewalks and in encampments. Compare that to 5 executions a year, and it starts looking pretty OK.
So I don't know, maybe they just need to tweak the law and say, hey doing drugs is ok as long as you don't harm another soul. But as soon as you are crapping on the sidewalks, robbing people, and threatening their safety directly, it should be an automatic death penalty.
But It Can't Execute Its Way to a Drug-Free Society
At no point in this boring human-interest piece does the author EVER attempt to substantiate that claim. I read it, painfully, twice. He never even comes back to it.
Not once. In fact, by the end of it, you come off with the impression that maybe we CAN execute our way to a drug-free society.