Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Tariffs

MAGA Economics Is Losing

Trump promised that protectionism and immigration enforcement would be good for the economy. The latest jobs report tells a different story.

Eric Boehm | 9.5.2025 2:05 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
President Donald Trump and Vice President JD Vance in the Oval Office |  CNP/AdMedia/SIPA/Newscom
( CNP/AdMedia/SIPA/Newscom)

President Donald Trump's "Make America Great Again" movement has always been more focused on vibes than policy—but if you had to boil it down to two basic economic ideas, it would be something like this: Higher tariffs to promote blue-collar work and stricter immigration enforcement to protect American workers from unfair competition in the labor market.

On both fronts, the latest jobs report (and those from the past few months) ought to raise some questions, particularly among those who have embraced Trump's agenda.

As a whole, the jobs report was not great—read Reason's Liz Wolfe for the big picture. When you look at the sectors of the economy that were supposed to benefit from Trump's economic policies, however, the news gets significantly worse. The manufacturing sector lost 12,000 jobs during the month of August and 78,000 over the past year, according to the data released Thursday by the Department of Labor.

Over the past three months, during which Trump's tariffs have been in full swing, the manufacturing sector is down 31,000 jobs. Other blue-collar sectors like construction and mining are down over that same period.

All three sectors figure to have been negatively affected by Trump's tariffs, which (contrary to the administration's claims) have hit American businesses with huge new taxes on parts, raw materials, equipment, and more. Like with any big tax increase, one way businesses can offset those costs is by hiring fewer people or postponing new investments and expansion. That's exactly what manufacturing firms say they have been doing.

In short: The tariffs are doing the exact opposite of what the Trump administration promised, but pretty much exactly what most economists warned would happen.

The data on labor force participation—which measures how many working-age adults are working or actively seeking work—tells a similarly unflattering story about MAGA economics.

Before getting into that, let's recall how Vice President J.D. Vance explained the connection between this stat and the administration's plans for aggressive immigration enforcement. In an interview with The New York Times last year, Vance said that jobs vacated by deported migrants would be filled instead by some of the 7 million able-bodied American men who are sitting on the sidelines.

Illegal immigration, Vance said, is "one of the biggest reasons why we have millions of people who've dropped out of the labor force. Why try to re-engage an American citizen in a good job if you can just import somebody from Central America who's going to work under the table for poverty wages? It is a disgrace, and it has led to the evisceration of the American middle class."

In the same interview, Vance argued that "you absolutely could re-engage folks into the American labor market," if competition from undocumented immigrants was reduced.

Six months into the Trump administration, that hasn't happened. Friday's jobs report shows that overall labor force participation has declined slightly, to 62.4 percent in August from 62.7 percent in July. Over the past year, the labor force participation rate is down 0.4 percent.

As economist Jeremy Horpedahl pointed out on Twitter, there's been no surge in employment for native-born Americans. The percentage of that population currently employed is 81.2 percent, up from 81.1 percent a year ago. (Overall, the employment population ratio in August was 59.6 percent, and it was unchanged since July.)

Big shifts in the economy can take time to materialize, of course. A sustained effort at booting immigrants from the country (and refusing legal entry to others) will certainly force some changes—and many unintended consequences. It seems far less likely that tariffs will bring about a manufacturing renaissance, but maybe those policies really are as magical as Trump and his allies seem to believe.

Right now, however, this much is clear: MAGAnomics has had a half-year trial run, and the results are quite unimpressive.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Sen. Eric Schmitt Echoes Bernie Sanders With Attack on Foreign Worker Program

Eric Boehm is a reporter at Reason.

TariffsEconomicsEconomyTrump AdministrationMAGAJ.D. VanceJobsEmploymentUnemploymentLabor ForceLabor MarketFree TradeEconomic Nationalism
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (55)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Don't look at me! ( Is the war over yet?)   5 hours ago

    Big shifts in the economy can take time to materialize, of course.

    Yup

    Log in to Reply
    1. Quicktown Brix   4 hours ago

      I think he mean "big shits on the economy"

      Log in to Reply
    2. JesseAz (Prime Meanster of Sarcasia)   2 hours ago

      Big shifts take time, headline argues it is always failing. Hmm.

      Does Eric notice his own contradiction?

      Log in to Reply
  2. sarcasmic   4 hours ago

    Trump says the numbers are lies, and that means the numbers are lies. Once he replaces the leftist statisticians with true patriots who aren't burdened with knowledge of leftist things like math and economics, the numbers will prove that he's right about everything.

    Log in to Reply
    1. NM Dave   1 hour ago

      How true. It's notable to me that last month, he fired the statistician that was burdened with a knowledge of math. The numbers this month are much worse, so he's now blaming Powell, who is burdened with both a knowledge of economics and a vast array of statistics and numbers. Eventually, though, he will run out of people to blame for his failures. One thing will be true, though....when we crash hard, he will still be obscenely rich.

      Log in to Reply
      1. SQRLSY   1 hour ago

        "Libertarians" for enriching THE obscenely rich Orange Shitler, and His Inside Buddy-ohs!!!

        WHEN (and of twat nature?) is the NEXT random wild "adjustment" in tariffs, by Uber-Wise Pussy-Grabber In Chief, AKA MASTER of the World's Economy, so that I can invest or divest accordingly?

        Log in to Reply
      2. Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment   37 minutes ago

        TDS-addled slimy piles of lying shit, OTOH, will never run out of someone to blame, right TDS-addled slimy pile of lying shit?

        Log in to Reply
        1. Sam Bankman-Fried   7 minutes ago

          I’m so worried right now, last night I was dancing in front of my mirror with my penis tucked between my thighs saying, “I’d fuck me!” Now I might lose my 2A rights!?! And like most gun owners I need guns to compensate for my small penis! Btw, my drag name is Tucker Carlson.

          Log in to Reply
  3. NealAppeal   4 hours ago

    Comparing losing like the Super Bowl Broncos in 1990 to losing like Super Bowl Eagles in 2023 can feel like winning.

    Log in to Reply
    1. Dillinger   3 hours ago

      lol I have a 1990 Broncos calendar on a wall in my office I wish I could prove it

      Log in to Reply
      1. tracerv   3 hours ago

        Karl Mecklenburg could be Jim Gaffigans dad.

        Log in to Reply
        1. Dillinger   1 hour ago

          yes.

          Log in to Reply
  4. Neutral not Neutered   4 hours ago

    Yeah America had bad vibes about an open border allowing in millions of unvetted illegals circumventing the legal immigration system. Yeah bad vibes were the reason.

    Log in to Reply
  5. Neutral not Neutered   4 hours ago

    "Right now, however, this much is clear: MAGAnomics has had a half-year trial run, and the results are quite unimpressive."

    Yes Trump and GOP in power for half a year have not completely turned around and removed the total fuckery caused by democrats and Biden for over 4 years. So they are failures cause it didn't happen fast enough?

    So you hate:

    1. a closed border and legal immigration system
    2. lower taxes
    3. lower crime
    4. reduction of the size of government
    5. reduced spending
    6. increased incentives for investment in America
    7. increased world peace

    How unimpressive

    Log in to Reply
    1. MollyGodiva   3 hours ago

      Will someone else please respond to this, the sheer dumbfuckery of it is giving me a headache.

      Log in to Reply
      1. InsaneTrollLogic (smarter than The Average Dude)   3 hours ago

        I wouldn’t talk if were you, Dr. Retard.

        Log in to Reply
      2. Uncle Jay   2 hours ago

        As opposed to...

        an open border with violent criminals, terrorists and people with infectious diseases coming into the US unbated?
        Higher taxes?
        More crime?
        More Big Government programs that don't work, are unnecessary an expensive?
        Decreased or no incentives to invest in the US?
        More wars?
        Are you really this stupid?

        More wasteful spending?

        Log in to Reply
        1. Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment   36 minutes ago

          "...Are you really this stupid?..."

          Why are you asking?

          Log in to Reply
      3. JesseAz (Prime Meanster of Sarcasia)   2 hours ago

        Talking into a mirror again doc?

        Log in to Reply
    2. sarcasmic   3 hours ago

      You funny.

      1. Closed border and immigration system is not necessarily a good thing. Especially for an economy that relies on immigrant workers.

      2. You mean the largest tax hike in generations? This will come as a shock to you, but tariffs are in fact taxes that are paid by Americans. Tariffs on China are not taxes on China. They are taxes on American companies and consumers that import things from China.

      3. When a politician sees a parade they run to the front and act like they were leading it all along. Crime has been on a downtrend for a long time. Unless you mean sending soldiers to cities. That's not going to lower crime unless they stay there. And there's nothing American about putting soldiers on the streets.

      4. All of the "reductions" he has done will be undone by the next Democratic administration. They are all temporary. It's not a long term win by any stretch of the imagination.

      5. Spending cuts are good. Except they're mostly temporary. And the biggest drivers of the deficit are going untouched.

      6. Investment in America is the flip side of trade "deficits". Where do foreigners get dollars to invest? That's right, by us buying stuff from them. Which Trump hates. So his economic policies are actually reducing incentive to invest in America.

      7. Tell that to the Ukrainians and the Palestinians.

      Log in to Reply
      1. Neutral not Neutered   3 hours ago

        I suppose since you keep getting away with lying to yourself you think you can get away with lying to others, too.

        Sorry, I don't know how tall you are but short sightedness is not a height issue.

        Log in to Reply
        1. sarcasmic   3 hours ago

          I suppose since you keep getting away with lying to yourself you think you can get away with lying to others, too.

          Sorry, I don't know how tall you are but short sightedness is not a height issue.

          Log in to Reply
          1. Idaho-Bob   2 hours ago

            Partisan hackery and nothing more.

            Do you really believe this shit? Or is it for the $0.50? Cuz if you are getting paid good for you. Disgusting like prostitution, but if it keeps the Maine winters at bay...

            Log in to Reply
            1. sarcasmic   1 hour ago

              Do you have a response to what I said that isn’t about me as a person? Didn’t think so.

              Log in to Reply
              1. JesseAz (Prime Meanster of Sarcasia)   19 minutes ago

                Response is below dumdum.

                Log in to Reply
      2. JesseAz (Prime Meanster of Sarcasia)   2 hours ago

        1. Legal immigration is not a closed border retard. What you want is no vetting.

        2. You wanted income taxes to increase by double. And you still won't admit who is paying these tariffs. Consumption taxes are always preferable to income dumdum.

        3. Note, sarc blindly repeats leftist talking points even though we have direct evidence of manipulation, even after claiming trump is manipulating statistics above.

        4. Even if trump is right, sarc will vote for democrats to undo it. He supports the one way ratchet theory.

        5. Ignores the cuts that have already gone in. Note sarc is quiet on who in congress is to blame for not having larger cuts. Weird.

        6. Ignores all data and is ignorant on trade theory. Basically sarc wants foreigners to buy up US resources.

        7. Why the fuck did you add Ukraine? You supported thst. Trump is trying to stop it. Why do yoi support 2 decades of rocket attacks and martyr fund killings of jews?

        Log in to Reply
    3. JesseAz (Prime Meanster of Sarcasia)   2 hours ago

      Eric has never built anything in his career aside from his own ego. He thinks magically all the announced investments should be in full effect already. It is amazing.

      Log in to Reply
    4. NM Dave   1 hour ago

      Most of what you listed is pure bullshit. It says a lot about your commitment to the cult that you posted this. You have the commitment and zeal of those who swore to us that Biden was as sharp as a tack, so....good for you, I guess.

      Log in to Reply
      1. Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment   34 minutes ago

        ALL of what you post are the fantasies of a TDS-addled lying pile of slimy shit.

        Log in to Reply
      2. JesseAz (Prime Meanster of Sarcasia)   18 minutes ago

        You were one of the Biden economy defenders lol.

        Log in to Reply
    5. Sam Bankman-Fried   5 minutes ago

      Uh, Trump was already president and added $8 trillion to the debt along with overseeing the spike in fentanyl deaths and violent crime that started in April 2020. Trump deserves the Nobel for surrendering to the Taliban and developing the Covid vaccines.

      Log in to Reply
  6. MollyGodiva   4 hours ago

    Wow. An economic approach based on nothing more that the whims of Trump is not working out? That is astonishing.

    Log in to Reply
    1. InsaneTrollLogic (smarter than The Average Dude)   3 hours ago

      Cite?

      Log in to Reply
      1. The Average Dude (Who's Smarter Than You)   2 hours ago

        cite?

        You need a citation for that? How about 'open your eyes'? Common sense? Allegiance to principle and facts, and not person and party? I would venture to guess you're not smarter than the average "dude" and your logic is certainly troll-y..

        Log in to Reply
        1. Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment   34 minutes ago

          How about you fuck off and die, asswipe. Or you could provide the cite.

          Log in to Reply
        2. JesseAz (Prime Meanster of Sarcasia)   17 minutes ago

          Yes AWR. A cite. Because Bessent has been on many programs to discuss their plan. Even on the leftist channels you frequent.

          Apparently, sarc, you prefer argumentation from ignorance.

          Log in to Reply
          1. Sam Bankman-Fried   3 minutes ago

            Bessent is living the fairy life married to Prince Charming with two perfect children created in test tubes and culled from hundreds of embryos. Did I say, “fairy”? I meant “fairy tale”! 😉

            Log in to Reply
  7. Incunabulum   3 hours ago

    *One* report refutes everything - 6 months of the other reports mean nothing.

    Log in to Reply
    1. Social Justice is neither   3 hours ago

      A report whose predecessors have been used repeatedly for partisan purposes exactly like this for years. Anyone wonder what the revision will say?

      Log in to Reply
  8. MWAocdoc   3 hours ago

    I guess critiquing a particular policy according to its own criteria is a legitimate exercise, but Reasonistas should never lose sight of the bigger issue that jobs and "the economy" should be none of government's scope in the first place. Government doesn't even do the few things it must do very well (although they might do a better job if they weren't trying to do a hundred other things badly at the same time) so sane Americans should start insisting on the immediate decimation of government size, scope and authority back to the original Constitutional limits. Even if Trump's "plans" had resulted in improving jobs, it's STILL wrong.

    Log in to Reply
  9. Incunabulum   3 hours ago

    I wonder where Reason's enthusiasm for economic policy was during the Biden years.

    Log in to Reply
    1. mad.casual   3 hours ago

      Just like the "The Anti-Lockdown Imposters of the New Right" article, coulda used a little more of the "Won't someone think of the poor economy!" panic in 2021-2022.

      Log in to Reply
    2. sarcasmic   3 hours ago

      According to all the articles that officially don't exist because they contradict the narrative, Reason was not enthusiastic at all. Especially about tariffs. But most people in the comments don't know that because they refuse to acknowledge, let alone read, articles that contradict the narrative in their minds that Reason never criticizes Biden or Democrats. Occasionally they will reluctantly admit the truth, but then cry that they weren't critical enough, claim that equals praise, and continue with their lies.

      Log in to Reply
      1. JesseAz (Prime Meanster of Sarcasia)   2 hours ago

        Is this where we go look at you and shrike defending the Biden economy. Even reason said the Biden economy wasn't that lol.

        Log in to Reply
        1. Sam Bankman-Fried   1 minute ago

          Yeah, the war and hardship Bush/Cheney was so much better than Biden’s peace and prosperity.

          Log in to Reply
    3. Neutral not Neutered   3 hours ago

      Bought and paid for sipping Mai Tai's on the beach

      Log in to Reply
  10. mad.casual   3 hours ago

    Ctrl+f 'inflation': 0 results.

    Wait, I thought we were all supposed to be trading in our papiermarks at a trillion-to-one for rentenmarks at this point as importers passed off costs to consumers. Socio-industrial collapse not seen since [looks right past 2020] The Great Depression. This was *the* *direct* *and* *inevitable* *result*. Now it turns out that there are all kinds of other factors at play in global supply chains and the "tariffs = tax = higher prices" narrative isn't so simple?

    It's almost like you guys don't know dick about economics and are just flailing and grasping at any economic narrative that fits your narrative.

    Log in to Reply
  11. Sometimes a Great Notion   3 hours ago

    Too be fair, he had a big mess to cleanup after he thought it wise to print trillions to pay for shutdowns and then the trillions Biden thought was wise to print to combat inflation.

    Of course executive order taxation isn't going to fix the economy, but he has a big mess to cleanup.

    Log in to Reply
    1. sarcasmic   3 hours ago

      after he thought it wise to print trillions to pay for shutdowns

      Veto-proof majority! Pelosi had a gun to his head! IT WASN'T HIS FAAAUUULLLTTT!!!!!!!

      Log in to Reply
      1. JesseAz (Prime Meanster of Sarcasia)   15 minutes ago

        I notice how both you and SOGN continue to ignore the 90% congressional vote. And then ignore the next 2 bills pushed under Biden (both vetoable btw).

        It is amusing watching neither of you understand how government works.

        Then again SOGN was also blaming trump for his governments lockdown.

        Log in to Reply
  12. JFree   2 hours ago

    Oh my. An article on Reason that is entirely about tariffs and immigration. Wotta nunpredicatable surprise.

    BTW - not that anyone cares (or is capable of connecting the dots) but a huge and obvious consequence of deporting illegals and restricting migration is that it will produce much lower monthly job gains. That does not mean it has the same effect on the labor market as the same changes before said migration changes.

    Log in to Reply
  13. JesseAz (Prime Meanster of Sarcasia)   2 hours ago

    So under Biden we had higher inflation, job growth based on government jobs and throwing hundreds of billions in loans to favored industries. 5T in regulations. Reason was almost silent on this economy.

    Compared to the dozens of articles in thr past 6 months with the majority arguing why things aren't fixed in 6 months. It is fucking retarded.

    Log in to Reply
  14. Benitacanova   2 hours ago

    Well, I heard Hyundai is hiring.

    Log in to Reply
    1. Minadin   36 minutes ago

      They need approximately 450 US citizen / legal resident construction workers in Savannah, in a hurry.

      Log in to Reply
      1. JesseAz (Prime Meanster of Sarcasia)   14 minutes ago

        And a few thousand in the 4Q. Along with a lot of other factories currently under construction.

        But since these buildings werent set up in under 6 months, they dont count.

        Log in to Reply

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Walz's Gun Plan Wouldn't Stop Shootings, but It Might Shred Civil Liberties

Jacob Swartz | 9.5.2025 5:20 PM

Josh Hawley's Anti–Driverless Cars Policy Would Kill a Lot of People

Jennifer Huddleston | 9.5.2025 5:05 PM

Navy SEALs Reportedly Killed North Korean Fishermen and Mutilated Their Bodies To Hide a Failed Mission

Matthew Petti | 9.5.2025 5:03 PM

Florida Deputies Jailed Her for 3 Days Even Though She Was Obviously Not the Suspect Described in a Warrant

Jacob Sullum | 9.5.2025 3:35 PM

Donald Trump's Antitrust Enforcers Continue Their Harassment Campaign Against Google

Jack Nicastro | 9.5.2025 2:36 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2025 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Take Reason's short survey for a chance to win $300
Take Reason's short survey for a chance to win $300
Take Reason's short survey for a chance to win $300