Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
    • Reason TV
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • Just Asking Questions
    • Free Media
    • The Reason Interview
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Print Subscription
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Tariffs

MAGA Economics Is Losing

Trump promised that protectionism and immigration enforcement would be good for the economy. The latest jobs report tells a different story.

Eric Boehm | 9.5.2025 2:05 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
President Donald Trump and Vice President JD Vance in the Oval Office |  CNP/AdMedia/SIPA/Newscom
( CNP/AdMedia/SIPA/Newscom)

President Donald Trump's "Make America Great Again" movement has always been more focused on vibes than policy—but if you had to boil it down to two basic economic ideas, it would be something like this: Higher tariffs to promote blue-collar work and stricter immigration enforcement to protect American workers from unfair competition in the labor market.

On both fronts, the latest jobs report (and those from the past few months) ought to raise some questions, particularly among those who have embraced Trump's agenda.

As a whole, the jobs report was not great—read Reason's Liz Wolfe for the big picture. When you look at the sectors of the economy that were supposed to benefit from Trump's economic policies, however, the news gets significantly worse. The manufacturing sector lost 12,000 jobs during the month of August and 78,000 over the past year, according to the data released Thursday by the Department of Labor.

Over the past three months, during which Trump's tariffs have been in full swing, the manufacturing sector is down 31,000 jobs. Other blue-collar sectors like construction and mining are down over that same period.

All three sectors figure to have been negatively affected by Trump's tariffs, which (contrary to the administration's claims) have hit American businesses with huge new taxes on parts, raw materials, equipment, and more. Like with any big tax increase, one way businesses can offset those costs is by hiring fewer people or postponing new investments and expansion. That's exactly what manufacturing firms say they have been doing.

In short: The tariffs are doing the exact opposite of what the Trump administration promised, but pretty much exactly what most economists warned would happen.

The data on labor force participation—which measures how many working-age adults are working or actively seeking work—tells a similarly unflattering story about MAGA economics.

Before getting into that, let's recall how Vice President J.D. Vance explained the connection between this stat and the administration's plans for aggressive immigration enforcement. In an interview with The New York Times last year, Vance said that jobs vacated by deported migrants would be filled instead by some of the 7 million able-bodied American men who are sitting on the sidelines.

Illegal immigration, Vance said, is "one of the biggest reasons why we have millions of people who've dropped out of the labor force. Why try to re-engage an American citizen in a good job if you can just import somebody from Central America who's going to work under the table for poverty wages? It is a disgrace, and it has led to the evisceration of the American middle class."

In the same interview, Vance argued that "you absolutely could re-engage folks into the American labor market," if competition from undocumented immigrants was reduced.

Six months into the Trump administration, that hasn't happened. Friday's jobs report shows that overall labor force participation has declined slightly, to 62.4 percent in August from 62.7 percent in July. Over the past year, the labor force participation rate is down 0.4 percent.

As economist Jeremy Horpedahl pointed out on Twitter, there's been no surge in employment for native-born Americans. The percentage of that population currently employed is 81.2 percent, up from 81.1 percent a year ago. (Overall, the employment population ratio in August was 59.6 percent, and it was unchanged since July.)

Big shifts in the economy can take time to materialize, of course. A sustained effort at booting immigrants from the country (and refusing legal entry to others) will certainly force some changes—and many unintended consequences. It seems far less likely that tariffs will bring about a manufacturing renaissance, but maybe those policies really are as magical as Trump and his allies seem to believe.

Right now, however, this much is clear: MAGAnomics has had a half-year trial run, and the results are quite unimpressive.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Sen. Eric Schmitt Echoes Bernie Sanders With Attack on Foreign Worker Program

Eric Boehm is a reporter at Reason.

TariffsEconomicsEconomyTrump AdministrationMAGAJ.D. VanceJobsEmploymentUnemploymentLabor ForceLabor MarketFree TradeEconomic Nationalism
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (88)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Don't look at me! ( Is the war over yet?)   2 months ago

    Big shifts in the economy can take time to materialize, of course.

    Yup

    1. Quicktown Brix   2 months ago

      I think he mean "big shits on the economy"

    2. JesseAz (Prime Meanster of Sarcasia)   2 months ago

      Big shifts take time, headline argues it is always failing. Hmm.

      Does Eric notice his own contradiction?

      1. 5.56   2 months ago

        Monolingual american right wing losers may not get the bigger picture as their information access is limited. Better ones do though. You're toast.

  2. sarcasmic   2 months ago

    Trump says the numbers are lies, and that means the numbers are lies. Once he replaces the leftist statisticians with true patriots who aren't burdened with knowledge of leftist things like math and economics, the numbers will prove that he's right about everything.

    1. NM Dave   2 months ago

      How true. It's notable to me that last month, he fired the statistician that was burdened with a knowledge of math. The numbers this month are much worse, so he's now blaming Powell, who is burdened with both a knowledge of economics and a vast array of statistics and numbers. Eventually, though, he will run out of people to blame for his failures. One thing will be true, though....when we crash hard, he will still be obscenely rich.

      1. SQRLSY   2 months ago

        "Libertarians" for enriching THE obscenely rich Orange Shitler, and His Inside Buddy-ohs!!!

        WHEN (and of twat nature?) is the NEXT random wild "adjustment" in tariffs, by Uber-Wise Pussy-Grabber In Chief, AKA MASTER of the World's Economy, so that I can invest or divest accordingly?

      2. Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment   2 months ago

        TDS-addled slimy piles of lying shit, OTOH, will never run out of someone to blame, right TDS-addled slimy pile of lying shit?

        1. Sam Bankman-Fried   2 months ago

          I’m so worried right now, last night I was dancing in front of my mirror with my penis tucked between my thighs saying, “I’d fuck me!” Now I might lose my 2A rights!?! And like most gun owners I need guns to compensate for my small penis! Btw, my drag name is Tucker Carlson.

      3. diver64   2 months ago

        No, he fired the statistician that was obviously partisan and couldn't get a job number right. Guess what, genius. If you suck at your job you get fired.

    2. diver64   2 months ago

      What a tool. One jobs report does not an economy make. It's the end of the summer.

  3. NealAppeal   2 months ago

    Comparing losing like the Super Bowl Broncos in 1990 to losing like Super Bowl Eagles in 2023 can feel like winning.

    1. Dillinger   2 months ago

      lol I have a 1990 Broncos calendar on a wall in my office I wish I could prove it

      1. tracerv   2 months ago

        Karl Mecklenburg could be Jim Gaffigans dad.

        1. Dillinger   2 months ago

          yes.

  4. Neutral not Neutered   2 months ago

    Yeah America had bad vibes about an open border allowing in millions of unvetted illegals circumventing the legal immigration system. Yeah bad vibes were the reason.

  5. Neutral not Neutered   2 months ago

    "Right now, however, this much is clear: MAGAnomics has had a half-year trial run, and the results are quite unimpressive."

    Yes Trump and GOP in power for half a year have not completely turned around and removed the total fuckery caused by democrats and Biden for over 4 years. So they are failures cause it didn't happen fast enough?

    So you hate:

    1. a closed border and legal immigration system
    2. lower taxes
    3. lower crime
    4. reduction of the size of government
    5. reduced spending
    6. increased incentives for investment in America
    7. increased world peace

    How unimpressive

    1. MollyGodiva   2 months ago

      Will someone else please respond to this, the sheer dumbfuckery of it is giving me a headache.

      1. InsaneTrollLogic (smarter than The Average Dude)   2 months ago

        I wouldn’t talk if were you, Dr. Retard.

      2. Uncle Jay   2 months ago

        As opposed to...

        an open border with violent criminals, terrorists and people with infectious diseases coming into the US unbated?
        Higher taxes?
        More crime?
        More Big Government programs that don't work, are unnecessary an expensive?
        Decreased or no incentives to invest in the US?
        More wars?
        Are you really this stupid?

        More wasteful spending?

        1. Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment   2 months ago

          "...Are you really this stupid?..."

          Why are you asking?

      3. JesseAz (Prime Meanster of Sarcasia)   2 months ago

        Talking into a mirror again doc?

    2. sarcasmic   2 months ago

      You funny.

      1. Closed border and immigration system is not necessarily a good thing. Especially for an economy that relies on immigrant workers.

      2. You mean the largest tax hike in generations? This will come as a shock to you, but tariffs are in fact taxes that are paid by Americans. Tariffs on China are not taxes on China. They are taxes on American companies and consumers that import things from China.

      3. When a politician sees a parade they run to the front and act like they were leading it all along. Crime has been on a downtrend for a long time. Unless you mean sending soldiers to cities. That's not going to lower crime unless they stay there. And there's nothing American about putting soldiers on the streets.

      4. All of the "reductions" he has done will be undone by the next Democratic administration. They are all temporary. It's not a long term win by any stretch of the imagination.

      5. Spending cuts are good. Except they're mostly temporary. And the biggest drivers of the deficit are going untouched.

      6. Investment in America is the flip side of trade "deficits". Where do foreigners get dollars to invest? That's right, by us buying stuff from them. Which Trump hates. So his economic policies are actually reducing incentive to invest in America.

      7. Tell that to the Ukrainians and the Palestinians.

      1. Neutral not Neutered   2 months ago

        I suppose since you keep getting away with lying to yourself you think you can get away with lying to others, too.

        Sorry, I don't know how tall you are but short sightedness is not a height issue.

        1. sarcasmic   2 months ago

          I suppose since you keep getting away with lying to yourself you think you can get away with lying to others, too.

          Sorry, I don't know how tall you are but short sightedness is not a height issue.

          1. Idaho-Bob   2 months ago

            Partisan hackery and nothing more.

            Do you really believe this shit? Or is it for the $0.50? Cuz if you are getting paid good for you. Disgusting like prostitution, but if it keeps the Maine winters at bay...

            1. sarcasmic   2 months ago

              Do you have a response to what I said that isn’t about me as a person? Didn’t think so.

              1. JesseAz (Prime Meanster of Sarcasia)   2 months ago

                Response is below dumdum.

      2. JesseAz (Prime Meanster of Sarcasia)   2 months ago

        1. Legal immigration is not a closed border retard. What you want is no vetting.

        2. You wanted income taxes to increase by double. And you still won't admit who is paying these tariffs. Consumption taxes are always preferable to income dumdum.

        3. Note, sarc blindly repeats leftist talking points even though we have direct evidence of manipulation, even after claiming trump is manipulating statistics above.

        4. Even if trump is right, sarc will vote for democrats to undo it. He supports the one way ratchet theory.

        5. Ignores the cuts that have already gone in. Note sarc is quiet on who in congress is to blame for not having larger cuts. Weird.

        6. Ignores all data and is ignorant on trade theory. Basically sarc wants foreigners to buy up US resources.

        7. Why the fuck did you add Ukraine? You supported thst. Trump is trying to stop it. Why do yoi support 2 decades of rocket attacks and martyr fund killings of jews?

        1. Sam Bankman-Fried   2 months ago

          Do you think Obama was tougher on the border than Bush? No, we just had a residential construction boom under Bush. Construction is mostly Latino with high levels of illegal immigrants. We had a construction boom under Biden that actually started in 2019 which is when illegal immigration spiked before Covid tanked the economy. But guess what Trump failed to do in 2020 even with record low illegal crossings?? Secure the border!! Because fentanyl deaths and violent crime spiked in 2020!!! That means the border wasn’t secure!!

      3. MollyGodiva   2 months ago

        Much appreciated.

        1. DesigNate   2 months ago

          Hahahahahahahaha

    3. JesseAz (Prime Meanster of Sarcasia)   2 months ago

      Eric has never built anything in his career aside from his own ego. He thinks magically all the announced investments should be in full effect already. It is amazing.

    4. NM Dave   2 months ago

      Most of what you listed is pure bullshit. It says a lot about your commitment to the cult that you posted this. You have the commitment and zeal of those who swore to us that Biden was as sharp as a tack, so....good for you, I guess.

      1. Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment   2 months ago

        ALL of what you post are the fantasies of a TDS-addled lying pile of slimy shit.

      2. JesseAz (Prime Meanster of Sarcasia)   2 months ago

        You were one of the Biden economy defenders lol.

        1. Sam Bankman-Fried   2 months ago

          Biden’s economy was great, have you been negatively impacted by gen z wanting fewer handjibbers??

    5. Sam Bankman-Fried   2 months ago

      Uh, Trump was already president and added $8 trillion to the debt along with overseeing the spike in fentanyl deaths and violent crime that started in April 2020. Trump deserves the Nobel for surrendering to the Taliban and developing the Covid vaccines.

    6. EdG   2 months ago

      July 2025 Budget Deficit: $291 billion
      August 2025 Budget Deficit: $280 billion
      Annual deficit based on July & August: $3.4 trillion

      Wow!! If "reduced spending" gets any lower, we'll stop spending altogether!!!! Right? Right??

    7. Hickamore   2 months ago

      1. closed border: essential workers gone
      2. lower taxes: yeah for the uber-rich
      3. lower crime: no lower than it was before military occupation
      4. reduction of size of government: yeah, essential functions like health and FEMA and air traffic control
      5. reduced spending: only on domestic essentials, and not overall
      6. How is that one working out?
      7. He said he would end Ukraine and Gaza in a week. Both are now worse after 9 months.

    8. NCMB   2 months ago

      “Yes Trump and GOP in power for half a year have not completely turned around and removed the total fuckery caused by democrats and Biden for over 4 years.”

      Yes the Trump and GOP fuckery for half a year have not completely turned around and removed the total fuckery caused by democrats and republicans for over 60 years. FIFY.

  6. MollyGodiva   2 months ago

    Wow. An economic approach based on nothing more that the whims of Trump is not working out? That is astonishing.

    1. InsaneTrollLogic (smarter than The Average Dude)   2 months ago

      Cite?

      1. The Average Dude (Who's Smarter Than You)   2 months ago

        cite?

        You need a citation for that? How about 'open your eyes'? Common sense? Allegiance to principle and facts, and not person and party? I would venture to guess you're not smarter than the average "dude" and your logic is certainly troll-y..

        1. Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment   2 months ago

          How about you fuck off and die, asswipe. Or you could provide the cite.

        2. JesseAz (Prime Meanster of Sarcasia)   2 months ago

          Yes AWR. A cite. Because Bessent has been on many programs to discuss their plan. Even on the leftist channels you frequent.

          Apparently, sarc, you prefer argumentation from ignorance.

          1. Sam Bankman-Fried   2 months ago

            Bessent is living the fairy life married to Prince Charming with two perfect children created in test tubes and culled from hundreds of embryos. Did I say, “fairy”? I meant “fairy tale”! 😉

  7. Incunabulum   2 months ago

    *One* report refutes everything - 6 months of the other reports mean nothing.

    1. Social Justice is neither   2 months ago

      A report whose predecessors have been used repeatedly for partisan purposes exactly like this for years. Anyone wonder what the revision will say?

    2. EdG   2 months ago

      Did you have a point?

      June Jobs: -13,000
      July Jobs: 73,000
      August Jobs: 22,000

  8. MWAocdoc   2 months ago

    I guess critiquing a particular policy according to its own criteria is a legitimate exercise, but Reasonistas should never lose sight of the bigger issue that jobs and "the economy" should be none of government's scope in the first place. Government doesn't even do the few things it must do very well (although they might do a better job if they weren't trying to do a hundred other things badly at the same time) so sane Americans should start insisting on the immediate decimation of government size, scope and authority back to the original Constitutional limits. Even if Trump's "plans" had resulted in improving jobs, it's STILL wrong.

  9. Incunabulum   2 months ago

    I wonder where Reason's enthusiasm for economic policy was during the Biden years.

    1. mad.casual   2 months ago

      Just like the "The Anti-Lockdown Imposters of the New Right" article, coulda used a little more of the "Won't someone think of the poor economy!" panic in 2021-2022.

    2. sarcasmic   2 months ago

      According to all the articles that officially don't exist because they contradict the narrative, Reason was not enthusiastic at all. Especially about tariffs. But most people in the comments don't know that because they refuse to acknowledge, let alone read, articles that contradict the narrative in their minds that Reason never criticizes Biden or Democrats. Occasionally they will reluctantly admit the truth, but then cry that they weren't critical enough, claim that equals praise, and continue with their lies.

      1. JesseAz (Prime Meanster of Sarcasia)   2 months ago

        Is this where we go look at you and shrike defending the Biden economy. Even reason said the Biden economy wasn't that lol.

        1. Sam Bankman-Fried   2 months ago

          Yeah, the war and hardship Bush/Cheney was so much better than Biden’s peace and prosperity.

    3. Neutral not Neutered   2 months ago

      Bought and paid for sipping Mai Tai's on the beach

  10. mad.casual   2 months ago

    Ctrl+f 'inflation': 0 results.

    Wait, I thought we were all supposed to be trading in our papiermarks at a trillion-to-one for rentenmarks at this point as importers passed off costs to consumers. Socio-industrial collapse not seen since [looks right past 2020] The Great Depression. This was *the* *direct* *and* *inevitable* *result*. Now it turns out that there are all kinds of other factors at play in global supply chains and the "tariffs = tax = higher prices" narrative isn't so simple?

    It's almost like you guys don't know dick about economics and are just flailing and grasping at any economic narrative that fits your narrative.

    1. Sam Bankman-Fried   2 months ago

      This past bout of inflation wasn’t a big deal because wages increased for the working class and SS increased for lower income retirees and for wealthy like me my real estate portfolio and stock portfolio boomed!!! Now the elevated CPI under Bush/Cheney was a big deal because it degraded lower wage disposable income and our economy is a consumer spending economy.

  11. Sometimes a Great Notion   2 months ago

    Too be fair, he had a big mess to cleanup after he thought it wise to print trillions to pay for shutdowns and then the trillions Biden thought was wise to print to combat inflation.

    Of course executive order taxation isn't going to fix the economy, but he has a big mess to cleanup.

    1. sarcasmic   2 months ago

      after he thought it wise to print trillions to pay for shutdowns

      Veto-proof majority! Pelosi had a gun to his head! IT WASN'T HIS FAAAUUULLLTTT!!!!!!!

      1. JesseAz (Prime Meanster of Sarcasia)   2 months ago

        I notice how both you and SOGN continue to ignore the 90% congressional vote. And then ignore the next 2 bills pushed under Biden (both vetoable btw).

        It is amusing watching neither of you understand how government works.

        Then again SOGN was also blaming trump for his governments lockdown.

        1. Sometimes a Great Notion   2 months ago

          JessieAOC telling lies

          https://youtu.be/D1KDnV9l2z8?si=JCNNp25sESQz7AhN

        2. Sometimes a Great Notion   2 months ago

          https://pandemicoversight.gov/about-us/pandemic-relief-program-laws

          1. Donald Trump signed 5 of 6/7 Covid bills (guessing you're including Biden's inflation bill, which is fine by me).

          2. Donald Trump whipped for the Bills to be passed, foing so far as threatening Thomas Massie with primary challenges.

          3. I've blamed Congress, and my govenor Larry Hogan for their roles.

          So stop lying, JessieAOC.

          1. sarcasmic   2 months ago

            Jesse will stop lying when he stops breathing. He couldn’t even be trusted to tell the time without lying about it.

        3. Sometimes a Great Notion   2 months ago

          So will you blame Trump for anything Covid related? Or are you, damn reality, protect Trump at all cost?

          1. Sam Bankman-Fried   2 months ago

            Trump was overmatched by John Bolton and Fauci. 😉

        4. EISTAU Gree-Vance   2 months ago

          SOGN? AWR? STG?

          Dude, what is it with the acronyms? Are you just not paying attention, or is this supposed to be a sick burn?

          I don’t get it.

      2. DesigNate   2 months ago

        Not to be that guy but:

        https://reason.com/2025/08/29/trumps-4-9-billion-pocket-rescission-violates-federal-law-and-usurps-congressional-authority/?comments=true#comments

        At the end of the day, it makes no difference if he bemoans the spending, is completely silent, or even encourages it, if this article is correct in arguing that he can’t not spend the money Congress decides to spend, then can we please put the blame where it truly belongs?

        1. Sometimes a Great Notion   2 months ago

          I blame every last politician who went in on the Covid plan, including Trump. Do you blame Biden for the Inflation reduction act, even though it was passed by Congress? Of course you should because Biden wanted it passed same as Trump with the 5 Covid bills he signed that were passed by amajority of his party.

          What good is a leader who doesn't lead?

    2. EdG   2 months ago

      Biden printed trillions to combat inflation? Any proof for that claim?

      1. Sometimes a Great Notion   2 months ago

        https://bidenwhitehouse.archives.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2024/08/16/statement-from-president-joe-biden-on-inflation-reduction-act-anniversary/#:~:text=Two%20years%20ago%2C%20I%20signed,casting%20the%20tie%2Dbreaking%20vote.

      2. Sometimes a Great Notion   2 months ago

        https://pandemicoversight.gov/about-us/pandemic-relief-program-laws

        See the 6th one.

      3. EISTAU Gree-Vance   2 months ago

        Lol. Ed didn’t know that. Too funny.

        Talk about cultists! Haha.

  12. JFree   2 months ago

    Oh my. An article on Reason that is entirely about tariffs and immigration. Wotta nunpredicatable surprise.

    BTW - not that anyone cares (or is capable of connecting the dots) but a huge and obvious consequence of deporting illegals and restricting migration is that it will produce much lower monthly job gains. That does not mean it has the same effect on the labor market as the same changes before said migration changes.

  13. JesseAz (Prime Meanster of Sarcasia)   2 months ago

    So under Biden we had higher inflation, job growth based on government jobs and throwing hundreds of billions in loans to favored industries. 5T in regulations. Reason was almost silent on this economy.

    Compared to the dozens of articles in thr past 6 months with the majority arguing why things aren't fixed in 6 months. It is fucking retarded.

    1. Sam Bankman-Fried   2 months ago

      Under Biden we had record deliveries of apartment units and hotel rooms. The inflation was very manageable and expected from a strong economy with workers inexplicably not getting a safe and effective vaccine.

  14. Benitacanova   2 months ago

    Well, I heard Hyundai is hiring.

    1. Minadin   2 months ago

      They need approximately 450 US citizen / legal resident construction workers in Savannah, in a hurry.

      1. JesseAz (Prime Meanster of Sarcasia)   2 months ago

        And a few thousand in the 4Q. Along with a lot of other factories currently under construction.

        But since these buildings werent set up in under 6 months, they dont count.

        1. Sam Bankman-Fried   2 months ago

          Prime age employment is maxed out…oops.

  15. TJJ2000   2 months ago

    Did you say from the BLS?
    That place the Department of Labor said was F.O.S. and made-up statistics outside of standard protocols?

  16. Marc St. Stephen   2 months ago

    While Reason and its editors are perfectly justified in calling out whatever shortcomings are seen from the current political situation, it is very telling that in the past eight months, there have been little to no articles here highlighting the bat crap crazy shit coming out of democrat mouths, or even the fact that I've yet to see a single serious idea or policy put forth by democrats in the past 8 months, let alone the democrat steadfast stance to NOT work with the other side on anything. But reason is surprised that the other side is going it alone and trying their best?

  17. Chumby   2 months ago

    Make
    Anal
    Gaping
    Great
    And
    Socially
    Meritous

  18. HoundDog   2 months ago

    I am the person who invented the term “Bidenomics” (seriously)! I now refer to Trump’s failed policies as MAGAnomics!

    1. EISTAU Gree-Vance   2 months ago

      Wow! You coined that? I am totally impressed! You should be the one solving all problems! Lol.

  19. Spiritus Mundi   2 months ago

    Boehm's prognostications on the economy don't have the best track record.

    https://reason.com/2025/06/10/here-are-3-big-reasons-why-the-big-beautiful-bill-wont-generate-3-percent-growth/

  20. Truthteller1   2 months ago

    Guppies like Boehm think if he bleat lies, distortions and ommissions loud enough and long enough, it will all come true.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Brickbat: Where's the Fire?

Charles Oliver | 11.7.2025 4:00 AM

D.C. Jury Acquits 'Sandwich Guy' of Assaulting Federal Agent

C.J. Ciaramella | 11.6.2025 3:55 PM

No Excuses for Zohran Mamdani and Radical Socialism

Robby Soave | 11.6.2025 3:00 PM

'Emergency' Has Become Washington's Favorite Loophole. It's Cost Taxpayers $15 Trillion.

Veronique de Rugy | 11.6.2025 2:20 PM

Mamdani Teaming Up With Lina Khan Paints a Grim Picture of What's To Come

Elizabeth Nolan Brown | 11.6.2025 11:20 AM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS Add Reason to Google

© 2025 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Take Reason's short survey for a chance to win $300
Take Reason's short survey for a chance to win $300
Take Reason's short survey for a chance to win $300