What Does the Public Think About Trump's Approach to Crime?
Polling shows that most Americans agree with President Trump that crime is a problem, especially in large cities.

With public support of his immigration and economic policies flailing, President Donald Trump thinks he has found a winning issue: crime. During a recent Cabinet meeting, the president referred to crime as a "big subject of the midterms," adding that he thinks it will "be a big subject of the next election," according to CNN. "Republicans are going to do really well."
In the past month, the president has instituted a federal takeover of the D.C. Metropolitan Police Department, deployed the National Guard to deal with the city's "crime emergency," and signed an executive order aimed at restricting the use of cashless bail nationwide. Trump has also threatened similar military deployments in other U.S. cities, which could stand on shaky legal ground.
Despite this, the president thinks his tough-on-crime approach is a winning strategy. A new Associated Press-NORC poll suggests that the president might not be wrong. According to the poll, 53 percent of Americans approve of Trump's handling of crime. However, an overwhelming majority of respondents (81 percent) view crime as a "major problem" in America's large cities, while 66 percent view it as a "major problem" nationwide.
Support for using the military in domestic law enforcement is divided along partisan lines. While 82 percent of Republicans, and 55 percent of respondents overall, consider it "completely or somewhat acceptable" for the military and National Guard to assist local police, only 46 percent of Independents and 30 percent of Democrats share this view. Republicans are also more likely to approve of the federal government assuming control of local police departments in large cities, with 51 percent finding it acceptable. Democrats (15 percent) and Independents (26 percent), on the other hand, largely oppose the federal government dispatching troops to large cities.
However, only 32 percent of respondents overall supported the federal government taking control of local police departments in major cities, as the president has done in Washington, D.C.
Notably, crime is one of the only major issues that skews in favor of Trump. With a 5-point increase from the July A.P.-NORC poll, the president currently has a 45 percent job approval rating; however, 54 percent of respondents disapprove of his handling of the economy and the Russia-Ukraine conflict, while 53 percent disapprove of his handling of immigration.
That's in line with other recent surveys. A poll released by Gallup on Tuesday finds just "40% of Americans approving of President Donald Trump's overall job performance, in line with support for him in June and July after registering 43% or higher in the first five months of the year." The Gallup poll also finds unfavorable marks for the president's handling of foreign affairs, education, and the economy, with the president failing to reach a 40 percent approval rating in any of these issue areas.
The public's perception of crime as a significant problem doesn't mean the president's heavy-handed, legally dubious approach is the right one. The federal takeover of D.C. has predictably led to documented cases of civil rights and constitutional violations. Despite the president's recent statements about widespread crime in American cities, there were signs as early as January of violent crime decreasing nationwide. FBI data indicate a 4.5 percent decrease in violent crime nationwide in 2024. Early data from 2025 suggest that the ongoing trend could result in the lowest murder rate ever recorded, as reported by Reason's Billy Binion.
While Trump may enjoy enough public support now to think that crime will help Republicans in the next election, an approach to crime prevention that usurps local control remains deeply unpopular. Just like other issues, approval for the president's crime policies could soon falter.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Criminals disapprove.
"Polling shows that most Americans agree with President Trump that crime is a problem, especially in large cities."
Crime victims would agree with crime is a serious problem...not that leftists care about crime victims and never have.
Like most right-wingers, you no doubt believe that cops only arrest the "bad guys".
Pedo jeffy has the mind-reading skills of a hamster.
His hamster’s name might be Lemmiwinks.
Like most lefties, you feel cops are only arresting these poor folks who are committing crimes to feed their families.
Pols love polls, proles love ploys, press love perps.
crime will help Republicans in the next election
Freudian slip.
While 82 percent of Republicans, and 55 percent of respondents overall, consider it "completely or somewhat acceptable" for the military and National Guard to assist local police
Completely unsurprising. Team Red worships the military and worships the police. I suspect that if a Democrat does win in 2028 - it doesn't matter who - that there will be MAGA demands for a military coup.
You mean like how they did lock-up during Biden's inauguration?
Soldiers will already be deployed in major Democratic strongholds.
Sarc, ask yourself why these Democrat strongholds tend to be the worst when it comes to crime. Develop some sort of self-awareness.
I'll take you seriously.
If it does not happen, you leave here. Deal?
Need more cowbell!
Violent crime is down way more than 50% since the 90s. That's why it's an emergency that requires deploying troops to cities. And I support that because as a Libertarian, I want big government to keep me safe.
If GOV isn't there to defend Liberty and ensure Justice exactly what do you think it's suppose to do?
STEAL from those 'icky' people and send you a check?
It is the paleo-libertarian vision: liberty is a privilege only afforded to those who have the proper morals and virtues and beliefs. Criminals don't get liberty - and by 'criminals' this includes anyone arrested by the cops, because cops only arrest criminals. Moral degenerates don't get liberty - and by 'moral degenerates', this includes 'anyone who disagrees with a particular social norm, even if there is no NAP violation'. People advocating for the 'wrong beliefs' don't get liberty, where 'wrong beliefs' includes 'anything that I disagree with'. Once these conditions are fulfilled, then all who are worthy of liberty can enjoy libertopia, and everyone else will be locked up, exiled, or murdered.
Maybe try just a little more stuffing into that straw-man.
Then maybe you can get more support to abolish law enforcement.
Surely those 'virtuous moral' 'icky' religious people are out arresting everyone who won't quote the 10-commandments huh? It must be happening. It has to be happening else there won't be an excuse to abolish law enforcement.
Wanting to see people treated innocent until proven guilty equals wanting to abolish law enforcement. Every time I think you can’t be more dumb you prove me wrong.
Your lack of self-awareness is staggering.
Oh look some 'innocent until proven guilty' stuffing going on right now.
Right. That concept is written all over 'chemjeffs' comment.
It has got to be there.... right? right? /s
You support MURDERING people for TRESPASSING.
Sit this one out.
This may sound surprising, but there more types of crime than just violent crime.
>>The public's perception of crime as a significant problem doesn't mean the president's heavy-handed, legally dubious approach is the right one.
lol dubious. if it's constitutional it's constitutional.
>>With public support of his immigration and economic policies flailing
lol flailing!!
Isn't electing criminals on their behalf what they voted for?
Oh wait ... Now I get it.
If they benefit then it's just charity but if they get robbed then it's a crime.
Inside the mind of eating your cake and having it too.
National enforcement should only be allowed to execute National Law.
Go Trump Go!
Poll of one.
Thanks intern! REEson gets what it pays for.
L O fucking L
Give it a few days, he'll be an "editor".
They could tosin a few other titles but it wouldn’t improve the content.
the problem is that everyone acting outraged now would have gladly called in the national guard during covid to enforce mask and vaccine mandates
Jacob Sullum's solid-gold crime statistics show Seattle is the 4th most crime-riddled city.
Oh, by the way, look what's beginning to happen. You know why? Because these mayors want to prove that their city crime problems aren't that big.
They literally got trolled into doing something about crime.
The teams will target repeat offenders and seize illicit weapons and narcotics.
With all due respect, why is this not being done now?
Deleted