D.C. Sues Pam Bondi and the Trump Administration for Replacing Police Commissioner
The latest escalation in the showdown between the Trump administration and D.C. elected officials

On Friday, Washington, D.C., Attorney General Brian Schwalb initiated a lawsuit against President Donald Trump and members of his administration. The lawsuit challenges U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi's Thursday order, which nullified the city's sanctuary city policies and named Terry Cole, the head of the Drug Enforcement Administration, as D.C.'s "emergency police commissioner," replacing current Metropolitan Police Department (MPD) Chief Pamela Smith.
The order also rescinded any previously issued directives by Smith related to MPD policy on immigration enforcement, directed the MPD to enforce local statutes on public space occupancy and demonstrations, and required all MPD leadership to obtain Cole's approval on policy decisions moving forward.
On Monday, Trump issued an executive order invoking Section 740 of the Home Rule Act, which grants the president the authority to place the MPD under federal control in the event of a declared emergency. The president also appointed Cole as the "interim commissioner of MPD." At the same time, Bondi stated that Gadyaces Serralta, the director of the U.S. Marshals Service, would be "supervising command and control" of "the entire operation" of the MPD.
Schwalb is seeking a declaration from the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia that the president's executive order and, therefore, Bondi's order, violate the Home Rule Act and the Constitution by usurping Congress's "exclusive constitutional authority" over D.C. The lawsuit also requests that the court restore control of the MPD to the mayor and the chief of police. Schwalb is also seeking an emergency restraining order, and a hearing is scheduled for Friday afternoon, according to The Washington Post.
Reason reached out to the Justice Department but was referred to Bondi's order for comment.
Passed by Congress in 1973, the Home Rule Act empowers D.C. residents to elect their local government, including a mayor and a city council; however, Congress retains ultimate legislative authority, which allows it to review and overturn local laws.
Section 740 authority expires within 30 days or when the emergency concludes, whichever comes first, unless extended by Congress. The president has already signaled his intent to apply for an extension, telling reporters on Wednesday that he would be "asking for extensions on that—long-term extensions, because you can't have 30 days," according to The Washington Post.
Congress is not constitutionally obligated to provide D.C. with a locally elected government, nor is it prevented from delegating its authority over the city to such a government. Still, it remains unclear if the executive branch can remove D.C.'s legally elected representatives without congressional approval.
Presidents and Congress have previously sought to reshape the governing body of the nation's capital. President Lyndon B. Johnson reorganized D.C.'s government in 1967, creating a nine-member council and a single commissioner, all of whom were appointed by the president. In 1995, Congress established a control board to oversee D.C. finances and didn't return control to the elected government until 1999. It finally suspended the control board's operations in 2001.
However, like many actions under Trump, invoking Section 740 authority is unprecedented and marks the first time a president has done so. It continues the administration's trend of militarizing domestic law enforcement operations to accomplish its policy goals and punish political enemies in the process.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Babylon Bee has stuff competition with reality.
We've been through this shit already with Newsome and national guard there. The law uses the language to direct the mayor. It doesn't give the mayor a say.
Newsome lost.
Wow, another dunmb as shit MAGA not knowing that at play are two very different laws which have different languages.
Yes. This law is much more clear doc retard lol. And even worse argiment from your team of retards.
The (D)C police were as safe and effective as the jabs?
Only because they have been masking the crime data.
Team blue mad that Trump wants to needle them to cough up the real data?
Fascist Bondi does not have any legal basis to change who works for the DC government.
She didn't doc retard. She put someone in place to lead the direction during the next 30 days.
God damn.
She changed the chain of command. She did not have anybody fired, Tony.
Blonie has no leg role here.
The leg roll can be painful.
funny how there is no mention of the fact that the MPD Chief was promoted from chief equity officer ... between that and the near useless crime lab its hard to argue against the federal intervention
(D)eserved.
It was her turn, and ended up being a turn for the worse to the citizens of Washington (D)C.
They were taken by surprise because she didn't signal her turn.
Im starting to slide towards the author and that side on this one. I'm hardly one with TDS and I don't particularly care for most of the stuff the left has done in the last decades. (That's way to nicely worded...the left has totally trashed much way too much.) 🙂
But, this looks like a stupid move on Trump's part. And for a change, I'd say a lawsuit & court decision is a good idea. Just exactly what emergency is it that Trump is using to take control of DC's police force? I don't think whatever congress passed this bill had "rampant crime" in mind when they picked the phrase "declared emergency".
Don't get me wrong, removing the sanctuary city policies isn't a bad thing; (though I'll say I've always thought the illegal immigration "crisis" was pablum for the Right, just as climate change, et al is pablum for the Left), but if the "declared emergency" is crime in a big city, that's an "emergency" that's likely to never be over. (Great, just what we need, another "war on drugs".)
The emergency is the rampant violent crime that has been ignored for years.
Somebody ignoring a problem for years does not negate fixing it being an emergency. The ignoring it makes it more of one.
The emergency is the rampant lawlessness of DC for decades now.
Why do people just assume and accept that large cities will have massive crime problems?
Phoenix and Tucson are larger than DC and are orders of magnitude safer. Hell, go to San Diego - there's really only a small section that's dangerous.
DC has a violent crime problem out of proportion to its population even when compared to the other Democrat shit holes.
Why do people just assume and accept that large cities will have massive crime problems?
Because they're full of Black people.
Which political enemies is Trump punishing here?
The guy worked for the DOJ, so swamp creatures?