Americans No Longer Trust Trump To Handle Inflation
The president has spent six months promising to make everything more expensive, and polls show that Americans have noticed.

President Donald Trump swept into office in January with a promise to tackle what he called the "inflation crisis" that had kicked off under his predecessor.
"I will direct all members of my cabinet to marshal the vast powers at their disposal to defeat what was record inflation and rapidly bring down costs and prices," Trump said during his inaugural address.
Since then, however, the Trump administration has spent nearly six months imposing myriad tariffs whose sole function is to make prices rise. Trump has raised tariffs on finished goods and raw materials indiscriminately. He's targeted imports from American allies and geopolitical foes alike. And even though there have been pauses and retreats at times, hardly a week seems to have passed without a tariff hike (or the threat of one), regardless of the signals sent by economists and the stock market.
Yes, the president has been working hard to make stuff more expensive. And Americans seem to have noticed the effort.
A weekly tracking poll run by The Economist and YouGov shows that Trump's approval rating on his handling of "inflation/prices" has tumbled by 30 percentage points since January. The president's approval rating on that issue started off in positive territory—back when he was promising to defeat inflation—but has fallen to -25 in the most recent tracking poll. Trump's approval rating on inflation has fallen significantly farther than his ratings on crime, immigration, and foreign policy, even though all categories have dropped since January.
Those marks are particularly important, as 21 percent of respondents in the poll said "inflation/prices" was the most important issue—more than any other topic included in the poll—and 47 percent of respondents said inflation is the most important issue facing the country. Meanwhile, 43 percent said they expect inflation to be higher six months from now, while just 21 percent expect it to drop.
From a political perspective, perhaps the most worrying part of that poll is how far Trump's approval rating has fallen while inflation remains relatively tame. Data released this week showed a 2.7 percent annualized inflation rate through June.
The report also showed that tariff-induced price increases are starting to hit, as Reason's Liz Wolfe detailed yesterday. Prices for new "appliances jumped the most in nearly five years, toys increased at the fastest pace since early 2021 while household furnishings and sports equipment climbed by the most since 2022," Bloomberg reported.
Keep in mind that the most potent of Trump's tariffs have not gone into effect yet. Unless the president changes course again, a huge set of new tariffs will be imposed on August 1. On top of the tariffs already in place, those August 1 tariffs would amount to a $2,800 annual tax increase per household, according to an estimate by the Yale Budget Lab.
What do you think that will do to his approval rating?
Tariff advocates like American Compass founder Oren Cass have argued that the price increases caused by Trump's tariffs are not inflation because they are the result of "an explicit policy choice" rather than an expansion of the monetary supply. As an economic matter, that distinction might matter. But telling Americans they should ignore rising prices because the president is causing them on purpose is…well, probably not as strong of a defense as Cass thinks.
The real irony here is that much of Trump's successful bid for the presidency last year was built upon general dissatisfaction with how the Biden administration had triggered and then struggled to control inflation. "Americans don't like paying higher prices for things" is perhaps the defining political lesson of the 2020s, so far, but it's a lesson that the Trump administration apparently has not learned.
If Trump is going to continue deliberately increasing prices, then he'll be deliberately sinking his approval rating too.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
For me, prices have remained flat except gasoline is noticeably lower. Ymmv.
Natural gas is double in price thanks to Trump lifting Biden’s China export ban.
LOL
Supply and demand.
They will never give up their retarded narratives or admit they've been wrong. It is amazing.
Amazing, indeed.
A growing number of food items have dropped in price at my local grocers. Our gas prices aren’t coming down much, but that is the fault of the communists dominating Olympia. They just added 6 cents to our gas tax, and also some producer level cost increases.
Trump needs to put western Washington under martial law, and lock up the Marxists.
Since Trump took office the annual rates, calculated monthly, are:
2025 3.0 2.8 2.4 2.3 2.4 2.7
Boehm is a TDS-addled POS, and the American public are gullible nitwits if they believe Trump is causing inflation to rise.
During SloJoe's term the annual rates were
7.0, 6.5, 3.4 and 2.9. so every full month since Trump was sworn in inflation was lower than the lowest seen under Biden.
Boehm is a TDS-addled POS.
Not where I live. Gas runs from $3.06 to $3.39 and higher.
The fact that the Joe Biden "I did that!" sticker is on a pump with gas at $4.48/gal. while the Donald Trump "I did that!" sticker sits largely unused on a desk is hilariously pointed. The only way it could be better is if R. Kelly were in the photo with a receipt holding up three pieces of ID.
It'll be interesting to see how long it stays that way.
Natural gas is the most important fossil fuel…it’s double in price thanks to Trump.
And then he tariffed the penguins, and that was the last straw !
The price of penguin steak is killing me.
I hate it when I buy canned dolphin and they sneak some tuna into it. Methinks they do that on porpoise.
Canned dolphin? Sounds fishy to me.
And all this time I thought I was getting canned baby seal!
Even Lex Luthor got caught off guard with the penguin thing.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kYnOygrhcGQ&t=5s
The annual inflation rate for 2025 is 2.7%. That is down from 2.9% in 2024 and 3.9% in 2023. And 2.9% inflation is only .4% above the average of 2.5% since 2010 and would only be the tenth highest yearly inflation rate since 2025.
Sorry but the inflation apocalypse that reason is so desperately wanting isn't happening and isn't going to happen. Worse than that, the inflation we do have is mostly due to a increase in energy prices. The price of imported goods has remained stable this year. So, tariffs are not the cause.
The price of imported goods has remained stable this year. So, tariffs are not the cause.
That doesn't make sense.
If we are collecting tariffs without getting pass-through price increases, import prices would decrease (because foreign producers would need to lower prices) The import price index does not include added tariffs. The import price index for June showed a slight increase of 0.1% however. Tariffs are added on top of that.
So either prices are increasing or we're paying through reduced growth/investment by retailers.
and isn't going to happen.
Let's hope we're spared by the TACO.
It makes perfect sense. Retailers can't raise prices at will. The price is set by the market. If they could charge a higher price, they would already be doing so. Most goods are either discretionary and or have some kind of substitute. So, when you slap a relatively small, and yes 10% is small, tariff on a good, the retailers can't just pass that cost onto the consumers. The sale price is what it is. So, it ends up being eaten by some combination of the manufacturer, the retailer, and the middleman. What this shows is that the profit margin on imported retail goods is larger than the sum of the tariff and the expected rate of return.
If the price of imports is flat, that means the foreign manufacturer is not cutting their prices. Thus the price of the tariff is paid by Americans, whether it's domestic manufacturers, retailers or consumers (which would show an increased CPI, like was shown in the June report).
The evidence is that the ability of retailers to absorb the price is waning and prices will climb, especially if Trump follows through on his Aug 1 tariffs.
The consumers are not paying the tariff or consumer prices would be going up. The price of imports can mean that the importers are paying the tariff but it doesn't have to mean that. It could be that the manufacturers are just paying the tariff themselves and still charging the same price to the buyer. You are assuming it is one transaction. It is not. There is the transaction between the US buyer and the foreign manufacturer and then the transaction with ICE that pays the tariff when the goods come into the country. So, the price of imported goods is not going to reflect the tariff. The tariff is paid separately. It could be either the US buyer or the foreign manufacturer who is paying that.
The evidence is that the ability of retailers to absorb the price is waning and prices will climb, especially if Trump follows through on his Aug 1 tariffs.
First, as I explained above, there is no evidence the retailers or the wholesalers are the ones paying the tariffs. Again, the tariff is a separate transaction with ICE and won't be reflected in the price of imports. The manufacturers could be paying all of the tariffs or some. How much will not be reflected in the price of imports because it is a separate transaction. Second, retail sales are up. So, I don't see any evidence that the retailers can't absorb anymore costs assuming they are absorbing any.
The consumers are not paying the tariff or consumer prices would be going up.
They are.
It could be that the manufacturers are just paying the tariff themselves and still charging the same price to the buyer
Come on...why not try unicorns could be paying the tariffs?
It could be either the US buyer or the foreign manufacturer who is paying that.
No. The importer pays the tariff. Hww about you present any evidence that a manufacturer is cutting checks to importers rather than just reducing their price by that amount? It makes 0 sense.
First, as I explained above, there is no evidence the retailers or the wholesalers are the ones paying the tariffs
I just showed you the evidence: an increased CPI along with flat import price index.
I don't see any evidence that the retailers can't absorb anymore costs assuming they are absorbing any.
Even if they do absorb the costs, it's still Americans companies paying the tariff. Less profit, less growth, less jobs, less pay.
They are.
No they are not. The rise in inflation is from energy prices going up. The price of consumer goods has remained flat.
Come on...why not try unicorns could be paying the tariffs?
Why wouldn't they be paying the tariffs? It could be either one. You are assuming that the manufacturers have all of the power and can just foist any cost they want to on the buyers. That is not how it works. If the manufacturers could charge their buyers a 10% higher price with impunity, they would already be doing it. They are already charging the highest the demand will bear. Both sides have leverage in this. You can't just assume one or the other will bear the cost.
No. The importer pays the tariff. Hww about you present any evidence that a manufacturer is cutting checks to importers rather than just reducing their price by that amount? It makes 0 sense.
The importer can pay the tariff. The importer doesn't always pay the tariff. ICE doesn't care who writes the check. And manufacturers often pay the tariff. Not everything that is imported has a buyer the moment it arrives. Manufacturers will import thing and then sell them once they get here. And buyers and manufacturers will negotiate who pays the tariff or duties in the purchase contract. You have this fantasy in your head where importers are just these powerless entities that pay the mean tariff because they have to and would never exert any leverage over the manufacturer. Sorry, but the real world isn't as simple as your fantasies.
Even if they do absorb the costs, it's still Americans companies paying the tariff. Less profit, less growth, less jobs, less pay.
Yeah, it is called a tax. People pay taxes and that money goes to the government. That is no different than any other form of corporate tax.
No they are not. The rise in inflation is from energy prices going up. The price of consumer goods has remained flat.
Core inflation which excludes food and energy increased in June.
And manufacturers often pay the tariff.
I'd like to see any evidence this is true. By my research this is almost never true. Exporters only "pay" tariffs by lowering their price...which would be reflected in the import price index.
Sorry, but the real world isn't as simple as your fantasies.
Dude, in their head, your local HVAC guy is buying raw aluminum and iron ore directly from the miners in China and the US and CCP are just equal partners in mucking with the contract.
The idea that a Chinese mineral company ships to a refinery ships to a mill ships to a manufacturer and that all the companies are located on either side of any border *and* controlled by interests (which may or may not be the CCP or Biden's FBI) across another border is completely foreign to them.
It's been pointed out multiple times that the CCP rather openly maintains their domestic cabotage fleet to its own military standards so that the ships can be used against its enemies, pointed out multiple times that the EU has less land mass and more shore line and *still* maintains both maritime, air, and ground cabotage laws far more burdensome than ours, pointed out multiple times that like coal and 'learn to code', the Rust Belt, and Boom towns before them, air and land freight combined with real-time logistics and plain old fuel efficiency and economies of scale mean that places like Guam, Puerto Rico, and Hawaii are no longer "jewels" of their various seas and never will be again.
And *still* we get "The US should repeal The Jones Act so we can be more like Europe."
You do understand that rare earth minerals can be recycled in perpetuity once on American soil? We should develop supply chains in America but they should be slow-walked. So a big part of the Rust Belt’s decline was recycling steel by Nucor which benefits most from steel tariffs.
Double and triple down on that shit why doncha!
Tariffs raise prices by slapping on a tax paid by the importers. Golly gee you're dense.
Know what the dumbest thing is about Trump and his defenders claiming that protective tariffs don't raise prices is? The entire purpose of protective tariffs is to raise prices! Even the president doesn't understand that. Our government is run by morons who have morons for cheerleaders.
Facts
Exactly, Republicans inexplicably believed tariffs were about eliminating tariffs on American exports which is called “free trade”!! Trump has always opposed free trade!!!! And America is a consumer spending economy which is better than an export economy. The key is reshoring value added manufacturing which we have been doing slowly since 2010 mostly because of cheap natural gas. Trump now wants to export cheap natural gas to China which will make manufacturing more expensive in America!!
So yoi and Mike are back to prices being affected instead of profit?
Know why the rest of us dont have to keep changing arguments? Because we aren't retarded on the subject.
Both PPI and import cost data were absolutely flat in the last report. But you ignorant morons keep going.
Oh Oh, typoes from speed-typing. Jesse's getting heartburn.
It is funny watching you schmucks defend Trump no matter how dumb he gets or what stupid things he does.
You know why you don't have to change arguments? Because your arguments are always "Trump said so".
Speaking of ignorant moron...
Ripples man. Ripples. Just ignore all actual data. Assume a complex system can be portrayed as a simple first order linear model. The STG model we will call it. Sure it is always wrong. It is built on incorrect assumptions such as "assume all other variables are constant". But he believes. And belief is better than fact.
Mike was given PPI data which is tied to retail and manufacturer exchange. It remains flat. Mike doesn't care about reality.
The PPI on goods which are subject to tariffs increased 0.3%.
The PPI on services which are not subject to tariffs decreased 0.1%.
https://www.bls.gov/ppi/
Since we are a service heavy economy this balanced out to flat, but the effect of tariffs is apparent in the goods PPI.
You really can’t see past tariffs in this equation can you?
He thinks it is the only variable like carbon and climate change.
Excellent analogy. They can only see one cause at a time, and it gets blamed for everything. In the case of global warming, humans are a very, very minor contributor, indistinguishable from zero.
Bud, tariffs raise prices, they do not cause inflation. Even your fellow Trumpistas have bleated about this.
Retail Sales Jump in June as Consumers Look Past Tariffs
The reality of people's spending habits don't match your goal seeked opinion polls.
1/2 true.
That stat is not inflation corrected. So increased prices would be reflected as increase in retail sales. Right now the estimate is that of that 0.6 % growth, 0.3% is additional purchases and 0.3% is increased prices.
In other words it 100 percent true - just not as large an increase as a 'layperson' might assume.
Ok
goal seeked
You misspelled both 'uninformative' and 'dishonest'.
Boehm hates Trump, and like Sarc, that’s all that matters. Both of them would see this country collapse before having Trump’s policies succeed.
Such is the way of the Marxist.
Remember this gem of wishcasting from Reason while inflation was still skyrocketing?
https://reason.com/2022/06/10/has-inflation-peaked/
Those times were clearly (D)ifferent.
And that increase actually was the result of monetary inflation. Reason insists that tariffs cause inflation which is impossible. The FED deliberately causes inflation and the rollercoaster booms and busts that it inevitably creates. Tariffs are a side show.
Let me explain this another way. When Trump imposes a tariff on goods from China, the importer has to pay that duty before they can get their stuff. If they're buying $100,000 worth of widgets, and the tariff is 50%, then they pay the government $50,000 to pick up their stuff. If that cost was imposed by Democrats then that cost would be passed along to the customer. But because Trump is doing this for our own good, the business just eats that $50,000. Prices do not go up. Even though the entire purpose of protective tariffs is to raise prices, since higher prices are unpopular Trump taxes do not raise prices. Only Democrat taxes do that. Fucking tReason. Get it together.
The prices of imported goods are stagnant. Inflation is being driven by energy prices. You really are retarded.
Yes, natural gas nearly doubled in price because of exports to China. Really wise to send Louisiana’s cheap natural gas to power China’s economy.
LOL, wrong
I should repackage Sarc’s comments on a Twitter account called ‘Drunken Retarded Marxist Says’.
Sun, you are arguing with a drunken idiot. Don't waste too much energy.
Money creation is INFLATION. More dollars created means less value, prices increase, impoverishing more people.
The increase in prices of consumer goods and services are the symptoms of inflation.
When the Fed prints more money, is inflationary.
Remember how much Sarcasmic complained when Biden put 100% tariffs on Chinese goods?
Me neither.
Didn’t Pluggo once claim Biden’s inflation was profit?
Remember when you said Trump failing to hit 3% GDP growth was the greatest economy in history??
Remember when you claimed inflation was profit?
That might have been before his akita stopped respecting him.
May every day be another wonderful secret!! I think Trump lied about being a Democrat in 2000…I think he was a member of the GOP—Gay Old Pedos!!
Still too retarded to understand how the market works.
Tariff advocates like American Compass founder Oren Cass have argued that the price increases caused by Trump's tariffs are not inflation because they are the result of "an explicit policy choice" rather than an expansion of the monetary supply
That's a comforting technicality!
That is true. Inflation is a monetary phenomenon. Tariffs are a price increase that the market adjusts to. That is a huge difference. It is not a technicality. There is a huge difference between the price of a good going up because of an increase in demand or decrease in supply or a tax and inflation. In the first case, the price goes up once and the market adjusts. In the second case, all prices go up and continue to go up and the market doesn't adjust. If you can't understand how those two things are completely different, then you probably need to accept economics is a subject that is beyond you.
Which one means our money doesn't buy as much?
Why do people complain about inflation? Do you think they're just bothered by the size of the money supply?
Inflation means our money doesn't buy as much. A tariff means that the price of a particular good or class of goods is more expensive than it was. Whatever the new price is, it is not going up beyond what it already has. Inflation is the constant increase in all prices not the one time increase in a single price.
I don't know how to make it any clearer than that. If you can't understand the difference, then there is nothing anyone can do for you.
I do understand what you're saying.
You're in the forest, but all you see are trees. What you're missing is what laypeople mean by the term "inflation."
Laypeople? Or just you?
Laypeople.
Laypeople and economists define inflation as a general increase in prices. The vast majority of the time it is caused by expanding the money supply. That is what controls the rate of inflation. However when tariffs raise prices it is still inflationary because prices are going up. Tariffs do not effect the inflation rate, and no one (except strawmen that get put down with a flourish) has ever claimed that they do.
Incorrect yet again.
He's 100% correct - do you even know how to use Google?
"Inflation is defined as a general increase in the prices of goods and services within an economy. It essentially means that the purchasing power of money decreases over time, as you need more money to buy the same things."
"In simpler terms: Imagine your grocery bill going up every month, even though you're buying the same items. That's inflation in action."
HOW that actually happens is not relevant: both higher taxes (i.e. the Tariffs you jizz all over) AND printing money has the same effect. Both are inflationary.
God damn sarc. Have balls to use the same name instead of socks.
Inflation is change over time. Tariffs are a one time impulse, not a exponential additive as described by inflation. They are not the same thing retard.
"In simpler terms: Imagine your grocery bill going up every month, even though you're buying the same items. That's inflation in action."
A single regulatory or tariff costs changes one time between months it is enacted. It does not continue to increase over time due to the single change. Youre as retarded as sarc is.
We have literal data showing no impulse due to tariffs. Non. Zip. Zero. But you retards continue to speak.
How many times do you morons have to be smacked down before you finally get even slightly embarassed? How many times do you have to be proven wrong by reality? All a bunch of fucking midwits. Parrots of incorrect narratives woth zero capability of adaptation to data or changes in theory.
Some of you were failed by your school systems. Should class action a lawsuit.
I'm being optimistic in saying 95% of Americans don't know the difference between "inflation: and CPI index. Just like they can no longer explain difference between "envy" and "jealousy." But I suppose we have to deal with the words as used.
Right
It would be helpful if the government and media would stop lying to laypeople about what inflation is. The dollar is not an asset. It is a debt instrument. It's printed right on the paper bills. It is backed only by the full faith and credit of the US Treasury which in practice means the future labor of the US taxpayer because not only does the Treasury not have any money, it is by any rational measure bankrupt. In other words every dollar you acquire is just a loan on the future productivity of the American workforce and somebody someday will pay it back. The FED purports to manage this by increasing and decreasing the cost of money but if they decide the economy is "too hot" you might be out of a job. This is not just arcane theory. It how the entire economy functions. Back in the 19th century nobody would trust our dollars and for good reason. Prices rise and fall with supply and demand and tariffs may change the equation at the margins. But they have nothing to do with inflation.
I fully agree.
The difference matters when it comes to dealing with prices increases.
Are you Nelson? Because he was arguing the same thing as you yesterday.
Yes, the difference matters, but it's a red herring in this discussion.
The issue is that people don't mean that tariffs increase the size of the money supply when they say tariffs cause inflation. They mean tariffs cause price increases. That's just the way the term is used and you can see it in every news article. Even economists accept this use of the term.
So we can spend the rest of the day arguing that a hot dog is a sandwich, but to most people, it's not.
It's like creech said, "we have to deal with the words as used."
Economics is a subject that is beyond him. That’s been obvious for years.
WOW!
Even for you, this was spectacular.
Lies, damn lies, statistics, and journalism.
Wrong. Trump triggered inflation with his Covid response. Biden, in his infinite senility, thought it wise to dump trillions more onto that dumpster fire turning it into an inferno.
All the inflation happened while Biden was president. That means it was his fault. Only leftist economists consider inflation to be a lagging indicator, as in something that takes time to manifest. Since inflation didn't happen the moment Trump signed the CARES Act, his spending bill did not cause it. Likewise with tariffs the fact that prices aren't going up the second the tariffs take effect, and are instead lagging behind, is proof that they don't raise prices. See? To be a good Trumpian all you have to do is declare economics to be leftist and ignore everything economists say! Then shout "Rah rah rah Trump 2028!"
You pour desperate, thirsty, retarded bitch. You just keep on losing, while America keeps on winning. You would prefer that America collapses just to spite Trump, and Jesse. Even though you are in love with both of them, in your sick, twisted way.
All of the negative trends Biden fixed started in April 2020. I’m not saying the trends are Trump’s fault but PPP was maybe the worst government program in history because it lacked accountability and oversight which was the responsibility of the Executive Branch.
True dat.
...because those USA tax-cuts and spending-cuts don't matter....
The only thing that matters is FOREIGN consumption!!!! /s
Guess what Boehm. You can MOVE to that foreign-market and you won't have to pay Trump Tariffs anymore. Butt-Bye.
I think Boehm would be much more at home with his comrades in China, Venezuela, maybe even North Korea.
lol what? We never did. No one seriously thought Trump’s pre-school level understanding of economics and judgment to match would help inflation.
Except that inflation is now lower than it was in any year under Biden. You really need to stop trying to understand economics. It's beyond you to even read simple statistics.
The trend started under Biden though. And the monetary issues obviously all date to March 2020 which is also when fentanyl deaths and violent crime spiked.
LOL
Yeah, when my Trump supporting friends of the family’s perfectly healthy 17 year old son died from fentanyl in 2020 it was hilarious!
Top economist at anti-Trump newspaper admits he is winning the trade war - and slams cruel nickname media gave him.
He understands it well enough that he’s a massive improvement over your senile overlord Biden and his Marxist handlers. That’s got to piss you off.
Except . . . prices aren't rising.
Anybody else remember a few weeks (maybe a couple of months) ago, when Reason was sure tariffs would usher in the global economic apocalypse, more reasonable readers wrote that the impact was far more likely to be niche and/or modest (especially compared to the no-shit embargoes and lockdowns during COVID) and still other readers (myself among them) pointed out that even if there were zero consequences to the tariffs, Reason and the MSM would manufacture consequences and headlines?
Yes I do.
Yeah I remember that. I also remember the Covid lockdowns and all we got from Reason were thousand word analysis of the benefits of cloth versus N19 masks.
Catastrophe, just over the horizon...I mean it's gong to get bad, really really bad, and you will have nothing, and it's TRUMP's FAULT!
[Oh please oh please oh please, dear Gaia, make the economy FAIL so we can BLAME TRUMP!]
Trump has more than his share of faults, and I don't like everything he is doing, but it's as though MSM [including many Reason articles] are literally praying for a cataclysm so we can return to something they call "normal."
2022: BIDENFLATION IS KILLING AMERICA!!! IT'S THE END OF THE WORLD!!!
2025: Look at those Trump hating losers complaining about higher prices. It's not like it's the end of the world or something.
Biden’s approval declined in August 2021 because of Trump’s surrender to the Taliban, right wingers refusing to get vaccinated which caused Delta death surge, and inflation which was from Covid supply chain disruptions including Americans not getting vaccinated and China refusing mRNA vaccines.
Sarc doesn’t know the difference between over 9% and under 3%.
Sarc has become so retarded he may make the list. Just tiring seeing retards like him and qb make the same incorrect statements over and over.
WTF Sarc. First off 0.3% is nothing. And when compared to the abhorrent spending policies that forced 8%and more there is no comparison.
Ripples...
https://thehill.com/business/5406292-businesses-tariff-costs-consumers/
Businesses across the economy are passing increased input costs from tariffs along to consumers in the form of higher prices, the Federal Reserve’s latest anecdotal survey of domestic economic conditions — commonly referred to as the “beige book” — found.
Higher costs from tariffs were reported by businesses in all of the Fed’s 12 regional districts, and many made the choice to raise prices as a result.
"latest anecdotal survey"
You were expecting facts?
Like a table showing the economic numbers when they cut interest rates to try to help Biden get re-elected compared to the economic numbers now when they refuse to cut rates?
Are there any anecdotes about a business lowering its prices now that tariffs have been placed or risen on said business' imports?
Nope. Just propagandist bullshit. You’re so desperate.
I trust Trump a lot more than any democrat, and most republicans.
But then, I went to school so long ago that we were taught math and English and logic.
So I can read the numbers, evaluate the numbers, and know things are a lot better now than when the cabal was abusing an old man to run the country.
If you trust Trump with regards to the economy then you didn't learn anything about economics in school or on your own. *shrug*
Trump’s policies are working. You’re just not man enough to admit it. Which is expected, as you are a coward, and a pussy.
That’s why your wife left you after she started fucking that cop, right bitch?
Repetition from the keynesian narrative retards that are proven wrong on a monthly basis at this point but too retarded to understand it.
Starting the article with a lie doesn't seem like a way to sway people into believing you.
"The president has spent six months promising to make everything more expensive, and polls show that Americans have noticed."
Why do people continue to think they can lie and that will stick and people will continue to follow them? The Global Warming human caused climate change is a 4 decade phenomena of lies gaslighting the public that stuck because of the shear volume of politicians and media and pseudo scientists working together with businesses bent on profiting from a new industry they are creating.
People have observed reality and have realized that Al Gore et al were lying. The Maldives are not underwater as was predicted. In fact the sea level has reduced there! Meanwhile the billions given to save them went to 3 new Airports and many high end resorts for the Elites to enjoy themselves while trying to force the regular people to pay carbon taxes for their consumption.
Sea levels aren't rising at increased rates, islands are sinking and sensors are failing giving false impressions of sea level rising at faster rates.
No different than the temp sensors that were once in remote locations in the fields and are now surrounded by concrete and asphalt which of course will show increases in temperature due to the heat island effect and not because of CO2.
2025 witnessed one day that broke records dating back into the mid 1800's on the east coast by 1.2 degrees F, 0.3 degrees C. Yet we're told that humans have increased temperatures by nearly 1.5 degrees C and now we are on a path to boil the oceans.
People are screaming that Trump's tariffs are going to collapse the economy because last month witnessed 0.3% increase in the rate of inflation in one month, which actually can't be blamed on tariffs.
FFS, take a breath. Stop the paranoia, look in the mirror and realize you are not geniuses and lying with predictions of doom and gloom only make you look foolish and untrustworthy.
They are just the climate scientists of economics. Incapable of learning. Incapable of seeing their models are wrong. Incapable of learning actual basis analysis of economics. Midwits.
Yeah I think it's likely that poll referenced reflects the relentless tariff narrative that's dominated the MSM and insignificant rags like Reason. How much time did the average person spend worrying about tariffs during the Clinton or Bush or Obama or Trump 1 or Biden administrations? Guess what. We had tariffs back then too! The reality is that consumer prices are either down or stable overall since Trump took office, native born employment is up, unemployment is dropping and after the irrational freakout in April, the markets are doing very well indeed. But as usual Reason demands that we disbelieve our own lying eyes trust their expertise. So yeah pick an elitist scam, climate change, Covid, Maryland Father, whatever. Reason will always be right on board.
Can't possibly have anything to do with the artificial economy named "The Fed".
Idiots. Sure just push a button and turn it on a dime. Europe is just beginning to understand, but not you apparently...
Poll: Americans who never liked Trump say they’ve lost faith in Trump.
There is one way to control this and that is to cut spending by the government but that is not going to happen with Trump's Big Beautiful Bankruptcy.
No president has any control over the economy. There are other pressures and the system is far too complex and varied to be controlled by any one man.
The Federal Reserve, however can create imbalances and inflationary pressures just by printing more money, which it does at the behest of the government.
When America's debt reaches $40 trillion, which it soon will, better be prepared for the results.
All empires collapse from within.