'Alligator Alcatraz' Detainees Say in New Lawsuit They're Being Denied Access to Their Attorneys
The lawsuit says attorneys have been repeatedly turned away from the detention camp and had virtual meetings mysteriously canceled.

Detainees at Florida's new immigrant detention camp in the Everglades and several legal aid groups filed a class-action lawsuit yesterday challenging the lack of legal access at the isolated prison.
Four current detainees at the camps—as well as Florida Keys Immigration, Sanctuary of the South (SOS), U.S. Immigration Law Counsel, the Law Offices of Catherine Perez, and attorney Victoria Slatton on behalf of another detainee—allege in a federal civil rights lawsuit filed in the Southern District of Florida that they can't schedule attorney-client meetings or confidential phone calls, violating their First Amendment and due process rights.
In addition, the lawsuit says that the unclear jurisdictional status of the detention camp has "made it virtually impossible for detainees, or their counsel, to file documents required to contest their detention with the immigration court."
"No instruction exists as to which immigration courts have been designated for submission of motions for bond redetermination for people detained at Alligator Alcatraz," the lawsuit says. "As a result, detainees held at Alligator Alcatraz effectively have no way to contest their detention."
The lawsuit is seeking a judge's order to force the Everglades detention center, which Florida officials have dubbed "Alligator Alcatraz," to provide confidential in-person and telephone meetings. The plaintiffs are represented by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) and Americans for Immigrant Justice.
"The U.S. Constitution does not allow the government to simply lock people away without any ability to communicate with counsel or to petition the court for release from custody," Eunice Cho, senior counsel with the ACLU's National Prison Project and the lead attorney in the case, said in a press release. "The government may not trample on these most fundamental protections for people held in its custody."
The lawsuit's allegations echo numerous recent news stories describing a lack of legal access and poor conditions at the hastily constructed tent camp, including frequent power outages, lack of showers, overflowing toilets, limited and poor-quality food, and oppressive heat and bugs.
Regina de Moraes, a Miami immigration attorney, told Reason earlier this week that one of her clients was held in the camp for eight days and nine nights in total, but she was never able to visit him.
"One individual was able to see their attorney one time, but after that, it seems that the facility blocked attorney visits," she said. "I requested through [ICE's Enforcement and Removal Operations] and also through the email that they gave reporters. Nobody responds to me. Nobody gets back to me."
In the lawsuit, attorneys describe being unable to find out basic information, such as where their clients are being held and which immigration court has jurisdiction over them; driving to the remote prison only to be turned away at police checkpoints; and having scheduled video visits mysteriously canceled.
The lawsuit says there's no known phone number for attorneys to call, and messages sent to a private email address provided by state officials bounce back as undeliverable.
According to the lawsuit, Katie Blankenship, an attorney with Sanctuary of the South, attempted to drive to Alligator Alcatraz on July 10 to visit five clients, but she was stopped at a police checkpoint and told to wait. After two and a half hours, Blankenship was handed a "visitation request form," which she was told was the only process for scheduling legal calls or visits.
On July 11, Blankenship received an email announcing she'd been "verified" for a one-hour virtual attorney visit, but the next day it was canceled due to technical difficulties and never rescheduled.
"Not only have we repeatedly been denied access to current and prospective clients, but after waiting for three hours at the site, it became clear that there is no plan or process to ensure any access to counsel or due process for the immigrants being neglected and abused there," Blankenship said in the ACLU press release.
Meanwhile, the lawsuit says detainees are subjected to inhumane conditions.
Michael Borrego, a Cuban national who was arrested for a parole violation for outstanding traffic violations in June, was transferred to the Everglades detention camp in July. In addition to only being given one meal a day and not being permitted daily showers, Borrego also "reported that there have been physical assaults and excessive use of force by people working as guards, and a lack of medical care and attention," the lawsuit says.
On July 11, Borrego had a medical emergency and was sent to a local hospital for surgery. He has since been transferred back to the detention camp.
"His family reported to SOS attorneys on July 15 that the facility staff were not providing him the post-surgical antibiotics the hospital had prescribed for him, and that due to the heat and humidity in the tents, he had pus coming out of his operation site," the lawsuit says. "He is experiencing significant post-surgery pain."
Borrego's plight has led him and his family to change their stance on his immigration case and seek his removal back to Cuba.
"Access to counsel empowers immigrants—and all people—to participate in their own legal defense, which has irreversible and lifelong consequences," Sui Chung, executive director of Americans for Immigrant Justice, said in the ACLU press release. "The conditions inside this facility are deeply concerning and paint a stark picture of the disregard for the well-being of individuals in custody. Such a facility, operating in near secret, and denying fundamental rights, is a stain on our justice system and represents a threat to American values and our recognition of human rights."
The lawsuit names as defendants the Department of Homeland Security, DHS Secretary Kristi Noem, Republican Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis, and Florida Division of Emergency Management (FDEM) executive director Kevin Guthrie, among other officials and agencies.
The FDEM, which constructed and operates the camp, did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
"The U.S. Constitution does not allow the government to simply lock people away without any ability to communicate with counsel or to petition the court for release from custody,"
Unless they are white people in DC.
Aw shucks. You beat me to it.
It’s easy to do your routine.
But your liver will hate you for it.
White US citizens.
For a moment I was wounding who you were referencing then I remembered it is a MAGA lie that the J6 traitors did not get due process. They deserved a bullet, but were given due process.
They were not given a lot of what they were due. Such as the no bail policy D.C. colluded on or the ones that didnt get a single appearance in front of a judge for months and a few cases a year.
"no bail policy D.C. colluded on or the ones that didnt get a single appearance in front of a judge for months and a few cases a year"
Welcome to "normal" in the US.
EXACTLY. They know the process is horrible and they deliberately want it inflicted on the dirty filthy illegals.
Hell, half the people here think that the MOST due process that any of the dirty filthy illegals are entitled to is maybe 5 minutes before a fake judge.
They are a bunch of sadistic narcissists. They relish cruelty against others while complaining as "uniquely horrible" when the exact same system is used against them.
Found one.
My muted stalker is equating waiting around without bail with being denied access to attorneys? Typical. Thing is, I'm never sure if he's deliberately lying or just painfully stupid. Regardless I find interacting with him to be like rolling in the mud with a pig. You get dirty and the pig enjoys it.
He's clearly both.
Wow. You retards really do just group together.
aye
Sad when you respond to your socks buddy.
Yes. We know. Illegals have more rights than citizens do in your world. More bites of due process in your world too.
Youre a standard leftist.
The J6 defendants even had the D.C. jails listen in and use calls woth lawyers in multiple cases. Were not given materials required by Brady. Weren't given medical treatment.
But do go on being a leftist shit with your other sock.
Remember...they do not REALLY hate Americans. They just think every other country's citizens are just better.
Cite?
While you look for that cite, can you look up tits on a boar?
I think I found Molly. This woman used to milk boars:
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12258007/Woman-extracted-pig-semen-work-looks-sue-employer-developing-wrist-injuries.html
Can we crowd fund an akita for molly?
That could fall under animal cruelty.
Indeed.
Whatabout how the J6 political prisoners were treated, huh? Whatabout that? You never complained about that you hypocrite. That makes it ok for Trump to violate the rights of these illegals.
The J6 scum were not mowed down when they attacked the capital. So they got off easy in my book.
Sarcs allies everyone!
WhiteMolly
I sleep soundly knowing you're a blundering nincompoop no one takes seriously.
I'm simply speechless that someone could be so ignorant.
Molly let everyone know.
You cheered and celebrated their treatment.
But his akita agreed that the J6s received cruel and unusual punishment.
More than 1200 people arrested and held for four god damn years without access to an attorney or even before a judge. Held without charges, or bail, in solitary where families were not even allowed to visit , where those with serious health conditions were denied medical treatment, where these 1200+ citizens were, for all intents and purposes held in a dungeon.
I can think of some others who should be in their place instead.
Cite?
He's using the fallacy of composition.
Some were held without bail and some had a difficult time finding an attorney willing to represent them. Apply the fallacy of composition and a bit of mendacity, and you get everyone being held without bail and everyone being denied an attorney.
This is from the same people who claim that no one was arrested during the Summer of Floyd, when in fact over 10,000 people were arrested.
You're dealing with brainwashed idiots who are either repeating lies that they believe to be truth, or spreading lies they know to be false.
Regardless they arrived at these stances through emotion, not reason. Which means no amount of facts or logic can change what they feel.
And the strawman defense for his own retarded views.
A d a shit ton of projection. On the damn day he repeats the Maddow conspiracy Trump won't hold elections. Funny.
That is a clear way of putting it.
If someone is already represented, they should be able to meet their attorney. Unfortunately, a lot of these requests are from legal aid or immigrant rights groups that are just looking to find clients.
In the article above where they say they couldn't meet with prospective clients, that's the tell.
A tell of what? Every current client was a prospective client at some point.
Well in this case they're shopping for clients not because they actually give a shit about them but to produce scary headlines and manufacture class action lawsuits.
If you're a prospective client, you are not a current client and, therefore, are not denied access to YOUR attorney.
The headline claimed they could not access THEIR attorneys. Reason, as always, lied.
You expect the asswipe MG to understand that sort of distinction? You have read enough of the lies s/he posts.
Whoops! You called it a prison.
That make the people held in it criminals, does it not?
There goes the ol' narrative.
Whoops! You called it a prison. That make the people held in it criminals, does it not?
Well, cool. I can lock someone in my basement, and they will automatically become criminals as long as I call my basement a prison.
I love the ACLU calling it a secret prison.
If there is a more publicized "place with fences" in the USA I don't know where it is.
"Such a facility, operating in near secret, and denying fundamental rights, is a stain on our justice system and represents a threat to American values and our recognition of human rights."
They were not saying the existence is a secret.
Just ask an alligator where it is and he'll point the way.
Are we talking about people with existing deportation orders that you and the ACLU are demanding extra due process for? Sorry but you lying leftist shitstains can't be trusted to say anything true.
Lawyers?
For what?
They're not being tried, they're being sent back to their countries of origin.
You don't get a lawyer when you're being sent home.
That's right. The Constitution says that persons get due process. Illegals are vermin, not persons. Should rats get due process? Of course not. And neither should illegals.
They had their due process in immigration courts as prescribed by the actual law.
It'd be a challenge to find a more MAGA response than this - illogical, insensitive, incomprehensible.
Hey sarc, do you use MAGA as a substitute to those not ignorant of the law? Seems to be your use case.
Psaki psays psarc’s psock did it first
Found another one here.
Best case scenario for these people is that some ACLU lawyer inundates the immigration court with speculative briefs and delays their deportation for a few weeks while they sit in a holding facility somewhere. After that they're going home. The agenda really has nothing to do with due process. It's a last gasp attempt to return to the open borders of the Biden presidency by creating a wall of propaganda that will win the hearts and minds of the great unwashed. And of course Reason plays along because to do otherwise would force them to confront the gigantic failure that they have been selling forever.
Look, people. The government simply cannot permit illegals to be treated humanely. Because humane treatment of people is what liberals want. So humane treatment of illegals would just be giving in to the Left. All the illegals deserve is worm-ridden food and a few sips of water a day. And if they complain, they can be thrown into the swamp as alligator food. That is how Real America deals with criminal lawbreakers. No mercy and no excuses.
Yes! We all know they're all rapists and murderers - ALL of them. They should be so lucky to he detained in such pleasant, comfortable conditions. Far better than what they deserve.
You sound like screaming women.
It’s funny.
Strawman like sarc. Hmm...
You're comment, like your handle is half true. A lot of illegals convicted of rape and murder will remain in state and federal prisons and be deported when and if they are released. The rapists and murderers at AA are no longer incarcerated in a prison and fortunately will get a free ride home. But their crimes aren't relevant at this point. Everyone housed at AA has a deportation order and a ticket to paradise. As to your handle, you are certainly average or below.
Everyone housed at AA has a deportation order and a ticket to paradise.
Great point. That's why they should be denied due process. Because law enforcement never makes mistakes, never lies, and would never make false charges against people who piss them off.
They haven't been denied due process no matter how retarded you are on the subject.
Tandem retards. Aren't they special.
That counts as two?
A sarc sock walks into the bar...
If you say so, but seems a bit racist on your part to make that assumption.
I give fucks about things. Zero fucks about this.
When it comes to dealing with dangerous criminals such as these and they are dangerous, along with being ILLEGAL ALIENS, grants them nothing what so ever.
The ACLU can take a hike.
The parents of Laken Riley and many other young women who have been brutally raped and murdered by these animals would like to add something.
Waaaaaa.. Never in the history of ever has an incarcerated person complained about everything under the sun. They should be determined to be illegal and sent back to where they came from. If the country refuses to take them then the Trump Administration should tell that country the plane will land and off load their citizens and any action against the plane will be declared an act of war.
If the illegal immigrants at Alligator Alcatraz already have final orders of removal, what other due process are they seeking? If they've already been ordered to be removed from the US, what are they seeking? Scotus needs to come out and say the constitution only applies to citizens and legal permanent residents. These illegal immigrants are being granted some form of premium constitutional+ rights that citizens and legal permanent residents have no access to.
Also a felony to stay past 60 days post final deportation orders.
They decided against due process when they sneaked into our country.
When the going gets tough the tough get going. In this case back home again. Just self deport.
You know what would get more illegals to self deport than detention centers in the middle of swamps? Real punishments for people that hire illegals. If they can't get work when they get here, they are much less likely to come. If they can't get work after they get here, they are much less likely to stay.
With all the news coverage of ICE raids at farms and businesses, I don't see any mention of what penalties those businesses get for having hired people without legal authorization to work in the U.S.
Then who filed the lawsuit for them?
Also, these people have not committed crimes, correct? They are not under criminal investigation, correct? This is a purely administrative process.
So why do they *need* confidentiality?
If they're applying for asylum - all that is going to need to be entered into the record. If they're detained mistakenly that will have to be entered.
If they've actually committed crimes they are covering up? Then get them out of here
So why do they *need* confidentiality?
Then I'm sure you'd be fine with not having attorney-client privilege if you ever have a civil tax case filed against you.
Then who filed the lawsuit for them?
The Autopen?
'Alligator Alcatraz' Detainees Say
Y'know the funny thing about being a border jumping criminal alien?
Hard to take their word about stuff.
When you break into my house and are stealing my stuff, the whole, "My sad story is a sad story" falls on deaf ears.
attorneys have gone to significant lengths to contact their retained and prospective clients, to no avail.
Now you know how ICE feels. It's like these people don't want to be found. Except I doubt anyone is chucking rocks or taking shots at YOU.
Also, I notice you opted not to include any redacted retainer agreements in your complaint that would illustrate an attorney/client relationship you're claiming is being deprived. That's weird, especially for a class action suit.
with their retained or prospective counsel
AHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!