Georgia Couple Whose Daughters Were Taken After False Child Abuse Claims File Lawsuit
Matt and Tuckey Hernandez lost their daughters for two years after their infant's medical issues were misidentified as abuse.

A Georgia couple whose children were taken from them for two years following a false claim of child abuse have filed a lawsuit, arguing that the Division of Family and Children Services (DFCS) officials violated official polices in an effort to sever their parental rights.
The family's ordeal—which was investigated in a 2024 story for Reason—began in 2023, when Matt and Tuckey Hernandez took their youngest daughter, 3-month-old Emma, to the doctor after noticing some swelling on one of her legs. Matt also expressed concern about a small bruise he noticed behind Emma's ear in the previous week.
The Hernandezes' pediatrician told the couple to go to Children's Healthcare of Atlanta (CHOA), where X-rays found that Emma's leg and ribs were fractured in several places. At the hospital, Stephen Messner, a child abuse pediatrician, quickly diagnosed Emma with "non-accidental trauma," another word for child abuse.
However, there were good reasons to doubt Messner's diagnosis. The Hernandezes showed all signs of being loving parents, and there was no evidence of abuse on the couple's 3-year-old daughter. "When coming to his child abuse diagnosis, Defendant Messner never reviewed any of Baby Emma's birth records, Plaintiff Tuckey's prenatal medical history or either of Plaintiffs' parental medical history, and only gathered some information at bedside," the suit states.
Instead of exploring Emma's concerning medical symptoms, the state removed the Hernandezes' daughters from their care and placed the girls in a series of foster homes. Both parents were eventually charged with child abuse.
The lawsuit further alleges that the DFCS violated its own policies in refusing to place the girls with relatives or family friends. Further, the lawsuit also alleges that, at one point*, a doctor "performed an invasive, internal pelvic exam…which was not supported or justified by any of the symptoms with which Baby Emma presented, and despite no child sexual abuse being suspected." Making things worse, no one told Matt—who still had parental rights—about the exam or attempted to get his informed consent.
Several theories have been presented that could explain Emma's injuries. When she was admitted to the hospital, Emma had very low vitamin D, which one physician testifying at a 2023 hearing claimed had caused her to develop neonatal rickets, weakening her bones. The condition would also explain why Emma had a large soft spot that appeared to be on the wrong part of her head. Further, in February 2024, Emma was diagnosed with acrocyanosis, "a medical condition that causes the hands, feet, and other parts of the body to present with a bluish, white, or gray coloration," according to the lawsuit. Genetic testing also indicated that Emma had defects in her collagen genes, possibly causing conditions associated with fractures in infants.
But these possibilities were largely ignored by the DFCS, which continued to attempt to sever Matt and Tuckey's parental rights and have the girls adopted by another family.
"We've given them so much evidence to prove this little girl was born with so many problems," Matt told Reason in a 2024 interview. "I just don't understand how that's the system."
Last month, Matt and Tuckey were acquitted of all charges, and their daughters were finally returned to them. The couple filed their lawsuit last month, claiming that the DFCS employees, doctors, and law enforcement officers violated a range of constitutional rights and state laws. The defendants "have worked together to deprive innocent families of their parental rights while denying adequate medical care to medically fragile children suffering from undiagnosed conditions that lead to their illnesses and injuries," the suit reads.
*CORRECTION: an earlier version of this article misstated when a physician performed a pelvic exam on Emma Hernandez.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
It takes a village or something... jesus christ what assholes.
If you are thinking about "HER", I think the full phrase was "The village will take your child to raise".
Lol, That's the one.
It take Hillary to raise your child.
If they had aborted them Reason would have applauded, so what gives?
Hateful snowflake MAGAettes never stop
Poor leftist. Stomping his feet they cant march and take over actual libertarians.
Why are you people even here? You add nothing to the comments. Just go to Unz.com and let your freak fly.
A lawsuit for kidnapping and two years of absence. JFC. Matt isn't a man.
a doctor "performed an invasive, internal pelvic exam…which was not supported or justified by any of the symptoms with which Baby Emma presented, and despite no child sexual abuse being suspected."
Dr. Woodchipper would be its nickname for all time.
There are things worth dying (and killing) for. My kids are at the top of this list.
Let's say the Hernandez family's immigration status was in question. Would you still feel the same way? After all, government papers are the difference between humans and animals, right?
Youre a retarded broken leftist at this point. You cant have any sympathy for citizens, only illegals. Fuck off shitbag.
Kidnapping is a serious felony in every jurisdiction. But the state is free to do it with complete impunity. The parents have apparently been adjudicated not guilty of abuse of their baby. But the kidnappers will never stand trial and will never pay a personal price even if the civil case finds them liable. Some things require old time justice by the local irregular militia.
Maybe so but this time the state as in the local CPS just may, hopefully, pay a price for their arrogance.
I have stated in the past that you own nothing that can't be taken away from you, not your home, your car and even your children.
Is this the freedom and liberty we were promised?
"We've given them so much evidence to prove this little girl was born with so many problems," Matt told Reason in a 2024 interview. "I just don't understand how that's the system."
Because with her underlying and largely unobserved medical condition, she was an outlier. They [the medical team, CPS, et al] saw what they felt they needed to see and acted on it; too bad they happened to be innocent of all of this, the system does what the system does [to you]. I am glad it finally worked out for them, but TWO YEARS is ridiculous. This is what happens when you let a government take more power than it should ever have.
Of course the larger tragedy is that the parents were apparently able, on their own, to find a likely diagnosis for the baby's problem. Which is exactly what they were seeking when they brought her to the emergency room. Rather than do their homework the medical professionals just stole the kid and didn't start any treatment. And they stole her sister for good measure. Low vitamin D and fragile bones is pretty obvious risk. Did Any of these assholes bother to even check? It's not rocket science. Some lazy bitch jumped to a conclusion and her dumbass opinion carried more weight than all of the countervailing evidence. Fuck these thugs.
The level of what is called medical care in the US is abysmal and overpriced. I have had to tell emergency room people, no my hand is not broken and it does not need an X-ray. Yes, it is lightly sprained. Then it was, do you want a CT/MRI scan if your impacted chest? What will we find out from that? Umm, nothing but we might know for sure what is causing the pain from your impact falling off your bike. And then what? Umm, nothing, we already decided you weren't going to die. So no real benefit in spending 3 more hours in the emergency room except racking up hospital bills.
For a pinched nerve, I stopped in at a ready med location to see what the could do. Two choices, steroids or painkillers. I am not a doctor, but that is not care. I looked the pain up on YouTube and found instructions for immediate relief by taking stress off my neck vertebrae.
AI is going to replace doctors and frankly it can't come soon enough.
It's all about the Jefferson$. Healthcare is now owned by corporations and hedge funds.
We are nothing more than columns of profits and losses .
I hate it.
It is the way the system is set up, albeit with the laudable but very broad goal of "protecting children." They saw what they saw, concluded that by law [mandatory reporting, along with severe penalties for not doing so] they had to act on it and the ball started rolling. This incident as egregious as it is, is not as much of an outlier as we would like to think it is.
We do not often enough stop to think of what a managed, regulated, and consequential world we live in. It doesn't take much to turn it against you and then you have to ride it out until, hopefully, some actual justice occurs; that of course isn't always the case. People who are less able to advocate for themselves go for a very long ride.
"When you hear hoofbeats, think horses not zebras."
Once you rule out the horses, then you turn to the zebras.
Hippocratic Oath: "At first do no harm..."
It means intentionally. And even then, it makes exceptions (eg. triage).
You do what you can with what you've got in front of you. If a kid has a cough, you don't immediately jump to lung cancer and get him on chemo. That would be violating the Hippocratic Oath.
And the whites of her eyes were such a beautiful shade of blue.
Division of Family and Children Services
I always feel so sorry for any low-on-the-totem-pole AAG that has to defend those morons. In any state. What an utterly miserable job that must be.
I hope they’re able to sue some of the individuals personally. This sounds like pure evil and not negligence.
"Stephen Messner, a child abuse pediatrician"
When you hire a "child abuse pediatrician" to look for child abuse, what do you think he would find? He'll find child abuse. Like asking a roofer if he thinks you need a new roof.
CB
I seen a number of child abuse cases, as well as cases where "reasonable minds" amongst the medical team could agree were not. But you have to THINK before you act and mistakenly upend someone's life. That and be willing to defend your conclusion; sometimes practitioners will default to "just report it" [thus absolving themselves of any further responsibility/ liability] and let God, or the bureaucratic equivalent, sort it out.
I have read numerous reports where parents seeking a second opinion for their child were reported to CPS and the child was taken from them. Nasty, nosey, arrogant doctors are to blame.
Of course this couple should and must sue those involved if anything, to make a statement that the state is not and should not be all powerful and be able to act on a whim.
The state is too dangerous to ignore.
Here's something interesting on Tom Woods channel: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wXSKes-0Vl4
Not likely:
"In most states, mandated reporters of child abuse and neglect are granted immunity from civil and criminal liability when reporting suspected abuse in good faith. This means they cannot be sued for damages if their report turns out to be unsubstantiated, as long as they had a reasonable suspicion of abuse. However, this immunity is typically tied to the condition that the report was made in good faith and not maliciously or with gross negligence"
Absent any malicious intent [you would have to prove that] nothing will happen to them. The intent of these mandatory reporting laws is to not only encourage but to coerce doctors, nurses, teacher, therapists..into reporting, even if it is over reporting. Again, these laws came about in the 90s as a response to what was believed to be under reporting. So now you HAVE TO and the States made sure you wouldn't face any consequences for that even if it turned out to be wrong