A Federal Inmate Had a Limb Partially Amputated After Being Kept in Restraints for 2 Days
An inspector general report found there were no limits on how long federal inmates could be kept in restraint chairs or strapped to beds.

A federal inmate had to have one of his or her limbs partially amputated after being kept in restraints for two days. Another incarcerated person died after being pepper sprayed and left shackled in a restraint chair for five hours.
The Department of Justice Office of Inspector General (OIG), an independent watchdog agency, published those details in a memorandum released Monday that found inadequate policies and limited oversight of the use of physical restraints on inmates in the Bureau of Prisons (BOP).
The inspector general launched the investigation after receiving dozens of complaints a year from inmates alleging they were strapped to beds or chairs for long periods of time and assaulted or otherwise mistreated while restrained.
A 2022 investigation by The Marshall Project and NPR uncovered rampant abuse and deaths at U.S. Penitentiary Thomson, a federal prison in Illinois. "Specifically, many men reported being shackled in cuffs so tight they left scars, or being 'four-pointed' and chained by each limb to a bed for hours, far beyond what happens at other prisons and in violation of bureau policy and federal regulations," the report found. A follow-up investigation by the outlets published last December found dozens of similar allegations of prolonged shackling and abuse at another federal prison in Western Virginia.
BOP policy allows corrections staff to use restraints to gain control of disruptive inmates—ranging from ambulatory restraints that allow limited freedom of movement to four-point restraints and waist chains that render one immobile from the neck down. However, restraints are only supposed to be used as a last resort, and never as a method of punishment.
When the inspector general tried to investigate whether allegations of abuse were true, it was stymied by poor documentation and lack of video or audio evidence to verify whether staff were even performing required medical checks of inmates in restraints. Additionally, there were no limits on how long inmates could be kept in restraints and limited review of the use of restraints by regional headquarters.
"We found that shortcomings in BOP's policies and practices contributed to the concerns we identified and limited the availability of evidence that could either corroborate or refute inmates' accounts of what happened while they were in restraints, thereby impairing the OIG's ability to investigate allegations of misconduct by BOP employees," the memo says.
The danger of those shortcomings was underscored by one case uncovered by investigators, where an inmate was held in a combination of ambulatory restraints and a restraint chair for more than two days.
"The inmate's injury worsened to the point of needing hospitalization and amputation despite medical checks occurring at time intervals that complied with policy," the memo stated. "The medical checks were completed by different medical staff who did not discuss the progression of the inmate's injuries between shifts, and there were no photographs or video recordings to document that a medical check was actually performed and to show the progression of the inmate's injuries."
In another case, the inspector general found that an incarcerated person was "placed in a restraint chair with restraints on both wrists and both ankles for more than 2 days and then, less than 2 hours after being released from restraints, sprayed by BOP staff with Oleoresin Capsicum following an alleged altercation with a cellmate and placed back in the restraint chair for another approximately 5 hours until being discovered unresponsive."
The autopsy report listed the cause of death as "Vaso-Occlusive Crisis due to Sickle Cell Disease Complicating Oleoresin Capsicum Use and Prolonged Restraint Following Altercation."
The memo recommended improving guidelines and training for staff on when and how long inmates can be placed in restraints, strengthening the reporting requirements, and requiring audio and video recording of health checks of inmates in restraints.
The BOP concurred with all of the inspector general's recommendations and said in an official response letter that it is working to implement them.
"The BOP is committed to addressing these issues and implementing meaningful improvements and views OIG's recommendations as a crucial opportunity to enhance agency practices and ensure the humane treatment of all inmates," BOP Director William Marshall III wrote.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Woulda been better off at Aligatraz.
So you slipped up and admitted one of the incidences involved underlying medical issues; how about going back and doing journalism on all the other cases cited.
The autopsy report listed the cause of death as "Vaso-Occlusive Crisis due to Sickle Cell Disease Complicating Oleoresin Capsicum Use and Prolonged Restraint Following Altercation."
Be gum, you're right, LTBF! It says "cycle cell" right there in the caption! No point in wasting time reading all those other irrelevant words or even consider other cases. This is an obvious Reason (get it?) to ignore everything else.
Maybe they should have just stopped resisting
I assume the next step will be to fire the IG or close down the department.
Can’t decide if this is justified or not without knowing the politics and immigration status of everyone involved.
'A federal inmate had to have one of his or her limbs partially amputated after being kept in restraints for two days.'
WTF? Is this the new DEI prison system, now with improved Gender Blindness?
They asked CHATGPT to be inclusive in the fanfic and forgot to proofread for sanity.
JB Pritzger should be cleaning up Thomson Prison, right, Blue people?
Once rode my bicycle up to Thomson past the prison on Labor Day about 10 years ago. Put in a good 120 miles in 90+ degree weather.
When negligence is not negligence, federal regulations rewrite power of laws??
"Our investigation found that there was no specific law on the books that makes it improper to take the Reason HQ safe home with you, although bank regulations make safe tampering clear as a Class A felony ..."
Put them in the cell and leave them there. I promise you, all this stops when you stop letting them out of the cells.
Prisons need not be a dungeon-themed criminal warehouse in 2025. Nobody ever takes this issue seriously because they can't wrap their brain around a new paradigm for correctional institutions. Redesign the cells - if not the entire prison itself - put them in said cell and, barring a catastrophic life-threatening emergency, do not open the cell again under any circumstances until their release date.
For what crimes should one be put in a prison cell and not let out for years? How large should such a cell be? Why not just execute them all? it would be more humane than years of solitary confinement.
For what crimes should one be put in a prison cell and not let out for years?
All of them. From the 10-day stint to the 70-yr sentence.
How large should such a cell be?
Mm, I don't know without measuring fixtures - but ballpark it at 10'x12'x10'. A little bit bigger than a typical dorm room on a college campus, I suppose - which I can't imagine you'd dispute is any kind of 8A violation. That should be more than enough to fit in a convertable sleeper (ie. a sofa bolted lengthwise to the wall, where you can pull the seat out to become a twin-bed, or similarly something to what you'd find in a sleeper pod or train car), opposite corner holds a modular sink/toilet/shower combo (they exist, they're about 4'x6'x8'). Plenty of space for a good sized tablet behind plexiglass put into the wall with a mounted bluetooth keyboard/mouse to control it, with limited telecom/vidshare capabilities - so they can do remote court appearances, converse with counsel, remote learning, visit with family/friends (incoming calls only from a pre-approved list, all monitored and recorded, to which you can request updates at any time and receive assuming it's consented to by the other vetted party - meaning you can get incoming calls from mom/wife/kids, but not from your fellow gang members or criminal associates) that'll allow contact and digital presence on Christmas morning or on birthdays what have you, and a "PrisonNET" of sorts for placing menu-limited meal choices, requesting clean linens, limited temperature control, etc. Also allows for digital library and streaming services (content restricted, obviously). Wearable/implanted biometrics for health monitoring and teledoc. A window on the opposite wall of the door, that opens/shuts inwardly and is obviously caged from the outside (also, I should mention that these prisons are built vertically, with the first level built a minimum of four stories up). The corner between the end of the bed and the width of the modular bathroom should be more than enough room for body-weight calisthenics. Maybe (but I don't really see the necessity) bolt a table that locks vertically into the wall, so they have a place to sit and eat their meals or do... whatever, write letters or do homework or something I guess. And a slot under the door for three square meals a day (using disposable dishes/cutlery), clean sheets and laundry, medications, etc. Contingent, of course, on first receiving all previously provided materials through the slot first. Cameras in all corners for 24/7 video monitoring.
I could mock-up a very basic graphic, if you'd like.
It reduces the need for guards (beyond camera monitoring and meal/toiletries delivery - and ANY tomfoolery in that regard results in instant termination and statutory criminal charges), prison staff in general (minimum of surgical certified doctors and nursing staff in 8hr shifts with access to a full surgical suite - so cons don't have to be transported to hospitals for medical emergencies), cafeteria and laundry staff (think the way airports do it for airplane meals and clean blankets/pillows), and maintenance crew. No contact - under any circumstances - with other inmates.
And then the only time the inmate comes out of the cell is, as mentioned, catastrophic emergency - or temporary cell (this one gets no vidscreen) to make any needed repairs to their permanent cell).
The prison of the future. 8A violations disappear completely.
Why not just execute them all?
Well, for one, I don't support the death penalty. Two - that's kinda letting them off easy. Prison needs to be FAFO. Not by threat of abuses at the hands of inmates or guards or gulag conditions - but by the reality of circumstance. Your entire world shrinks to 1200 cubic feet with only a digital connection and a window to look out of to see the world while you count the days of your sentence.
it would be more humane than years of solitary confinement.
The most comfortable solitary confinement you can imagine. This is better than most military lives on active deployment. It's what some of us were forced to get used to during COVID. Some people in major cities would consider it an upgrade to their current apartment. The "tiny homes" types even elect for this sort of thing.
The only difference being that the inmate's door doesn't open. Because, again, outside of catastrophic emergency, this is NO good reason to ever open that inmate's door. Not one. And I defy you name one to the contrary.