90 Deals in 90 Days? Trump's Trade War Is Failing on Its Own Terms
The trade deficit is getting bigger, the deals aren't coming, and foreign investment has declined.

When President Donald Trump announced the "Liberation Day" tariffs on most imports in early April, his trade advisors promised it was the prelude to new, better trade deals with dozens of other countries.
"We're going to run 90 deals in 90 days," Peter Navarro, the White House's top trade advisor, told Fox Business on April 12, shortly after Trump paused those tariffs—ostensibly to allow negotiations to take place.
It's been 76 days since then, and there have not been 76 new trade deals. Not even close. The actual tally is two, and that's only if you count the "framework" deals with China and the United Kingdom—neither of which amounts to a full trade deal at the moment.
On Thursday, the Trump administration officially backed down from the "90 deals in 90 days" posturing. Press secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters that the early July deadline for re-implementing those paused tariffs was "not critical." Whether the paused "Liberation Day" tariffs return in early July is "a decision for the president to make," she added.
On Friday morning, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said trade negotiations will continue until at least September 1, effectively giving the administration an extra 60 days to deliver those 90 deals.
Of course, that also means the uncertainty of the trade war will continue for businesses that have to plan purchases more than a few months ahead.
What's becoming more certain is that Trump's second-term trade war has failed on its own terms. That's evidently not only in the lack of new trade deals that have been delivered, but also in two other data points that crystallized this week.
First, data from the Commerce Department showed that America's trade deficit—the gap between the value of all imports and all exports—widened to $96.6 billion in May. That's an 11 percent increase over April. The main culprit in the growing trade deficit was a decline in exports (which fell by $9.7 billion) even as imports stayed flat.
Shrinking the trade deficit has been one of Trump's obsessions since first taking office in 2017, and he has repeatedly claimed that higher tariffs would accomplish that task. What he forgets, however, is that declining exports are a major consequence of higher tariffs. This happens because American companies become less productive as tariffs disrupt their supply chains and foreign countries retaliate by raising their tariffs in response. The same thing happened during his first term: Higher tariffs caused exports to decline, and the trade deficit widened.
Second, a separate Commerce Department report showed that foreign investment into the United States also slowed during the first quarter of the year. While that's not a direct response to the "Liberation Day" tariffs imposed in early April, it likely reflects "high business uncertainty over President Donald Trump's tariff plans," as Reuters noted.
Remember that Trump imposed tariffs on goods from Canada, Mexico, and China in February and spent his first few months in office promising more tariffs in the near future. It's no wonder that businesses pulled back on investment plans in the U.S. while they waited to see how all that would shake out.
Again, this shows the failure of the trade war's fundamental premise. Rather than encouraging more investment and production in the United States, the higher costs and economic uncertainty created by tariffs (and the threat of tariffs) is reducing those very investments.
One final data point worth considering: As of June 24, the Treasury Department reported collecting more than $26.7 billion in tariff revenue this month, up from $22 billion in the month of May and $17.4 billion in April. That's the direct cost of the trade war: the dollars coming out of Americans' wallets and businesses' accounts as they buy imported goods.
When Trump announced those "Liberation Day" tariffs, he said any pain from the new tariffs would be offset by all the benefits. "We will supercharge our domestic industrial base. We will pry open foreign markets and break down foreign trade barriers, and ultimately, more production at home will mean stronger competition and lower prices for consumers," Trump promised on April 2, which he said would be remembered as "the day that we began to make America wealthy again."
None of that has happened.
There are not going to be 90 deals in 90 days—or by September 1. It's time for the Trump administration to cut its losses, remove the tariffs, and end this foolish trade war with the entire globe.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Article I, Section 8 states: “The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises
No Taxation without Representation.
It is cute how you keep pretending congress didnt pass laws that grant authoritybfor these tariffs.
But when you're out of actual economic arguments because every prediction you've given has been wrong, this is what you're left with. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Just keep pretending unilateral disadvantaged trade is free trade. Makes you look principled. Ignore that the effects of your beliefs require inflationary policy and have led to ever growing welfare. Do you.
Oh, you commie kids and your adherence to progressivism legislation. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Keep pretending that taking golden shares isn't communism. Keep pretending Donald Trump didn't sign the Cares Act as a willing and enthusiastic participant.
"you keep pretending congress didnt pass laws that grant authoritybfor these tariffs."
Is that why they have to claim that trade deficits are a national emergency and that it is really about drugs coming in from Canada?
They actually didnt have to make that claim at all. But it is actually one of the pathways regarding executive tariffs.
Look. Why dont some of you actually spend some time reading the fucking laws instead of proving your ignorance?
JessieAOC living constitutionalist.
One more thing in common with the leftists he hates.
He's basically the MAGA Clayton Bigsby
I've got a long list of things MAGAs have in common with the leftists they hate.
They both like to redefine words. In the case of MAGAs they redefine words like "jurisdiction" "due process" and "emergency".
They both like to increase taxes. Leftist have never met a tax they didn't like, and MAGAs have never met a tariff they didn't like.
They both can't decide right and wrong without knowing personal attributes of the people involved. The left needs to know race, sexual orientation and things like that, while MAGAs need to know political affiliation and immigration status.
They both like price controls.
They both mock the "decadent" American lifestyle. Bernie says we don't need so many deodorants, and Trump says girls don't need lots of dolls.
When someone doesn't like how something is being done, they both conclude that the person opposes the end goal.
They both call any court ruling they don't like "activist."
They both only support the Constitution when convenient, and claim that its plain language means something else when its inconvenient.
When it comes to the seen and the unseen in economics, they both deny the unseen exists.
They both deny comparative advantage and opportunity cost.
And finally they both agree that the long American tradition of skepticism towards authority and the law is a bad thing because they're both authoritarians.
The list keeps growing too.
A lot of back and forth when you retards could have actually spent time reading the laws instead of watching Maddow or reading reddit.
Have any of you retards asked why your predictions are always wrong yet?
You mean just like you could spend time reading the many books and articles spanning many decades about how tariffs completely suck?
Winning the occasional battle is not winning the war, Binary Man.
Great comment. You can tell Trump used to identify as a Democrat. He convinces his minions that they have been victimized by globalists, the media, and academics. He claims he can wind back the clock to their imagined happier times. Leaded fuel, incandescent light bulbs, vent windows and a permanent industrial age. What he doesn’t tell them is things are actually pretty good. There are currently 600,000 jobs in the U.S. according to the WSJ. They can’t fill the jobs they have now. What is Trump talking about?
Hey sarc, how sre your fake stocks doing? One would think you'd be embarrassed from your predictions 2 months ago, but leftists aren't capable of reflection.
Ok, retard.
Guess you also take no issue with Obamacare since it was passed by legislation. And SCOTUS said it was okey-dokey.
It only took a penaltax to get it done.
Hey now, cornhusker kickbacks aren't chopped liver, either.
“It’s no good, and you aren’t doing it fast enough!”
I don't see him complaining that they aren't working fast enough. Instead, he is pointing out the fact that they aren't working as fast as they said they would.
"It's no good, and you're not even doing those bad things as fast as you said you would. Thus, you're failing by the exact standards you put out for what your success would look like."
Another cope filled leftist. Sad.
Sheesh, that seems bad. I'm surprised Congress went for such a drastic tax hike/trade/economic policy.
Finally, a rational critique of Trump's economic policies on the Reason website!
Where?!
Finally? Where have you been?
By every metric it has been a success. What the fuck is wrong with you boehm?
Decreasing inflation rate. Record stock market this week. Energy down. Trillions in domestic investment. Growing wages.
What the fuck is wrong with you?
Orangemanbad is all that matters to him.
"By every metric..." .. dude, we knew you were dumb but it's getting embarrassing. Not a single syllable you uttered above has any direct correlation to tariffs - because all of those things can, and do, happen anyway even if tariffs were non-existent. Hell they would probably all be doing better.
But as always, you prove you know nothing because in E.V.E.R.Y. article about this subject, you NEVER directly address, disprove or refute what's being said in the article - always sidestepping and hand wringing about how unemployment is falling or the PPI is doing gangbusters - all good, all unrelated to the (many) costs of tariffs. Top it all off with a healthy serving of calling people "retards", when you're called out on your bullshit and you have no real response.
Is there a toilet nearby you can flush your head in?
Trump's Trade War Is Failing on Its Own Terms
Which terms?
The ones where he's going to negotiate "true" free trade and get tariffs down to zero?
The ones where he's going to use modest tariffs to generate revenue and decrease other taxes?
Or the ones where he's going to use very high tariffs to raise the prices of imports and protect American businesses?
Kind of hard when all the terms are mutually exclusive.
2 countries have negotiated 0%. The rest have not dumdum.
The tariffs are hibernating 28B a year, paid for primarily foreign importing companies. Yet you demand 38B a month on citizens merely earning an income. Weird.
Prices aren't rising as seen in inflation data dumdum.
The terms are not mutually exclusive, you're just fucking retarded.
To be fair, Sarc is a MASSIVE retard. And the decades of alcohol abuse aren’t helping.
FAIL.
Fatass Donnie said foreign manufacturers would rush to the US to avoid tariffs.
...GE Appliances is significantly expanding its manufacturing operations in Kentucky, specifically at its Appliance Park headquarters in Louisville. They are investing $490 million to move production of most of its washing machines from China to Kentucky, creating 800 new jobs. This move is part of a broader strategy to reshore manufacturing and aligns with the current economic and policy environment, according to GE Appliances.
The. Horror.
The reshoring boom began in 2021-22.
Eric, I'm going to show you something. Promise me you won't commit suicide.