Why Can't Elon Musk and Donald Trump Both Win?
In a petty, public war of words, Trump threatens to cut off federal support to Musk's companies after the billionaire attacked his deficit-busting budget bill.

A feud between President Donald Trump and his former advisor Elon Musk erupted on Thursday, when the two billionaires began swapping escalating insults and threats over their respective social media platforms.
Trump said that the U.S. government would be canceling its contracts with Musk's companies. He asserted that Musk had only turned on his administration because of its support for rolling back tax credits for electric vehicle purchases.
Musk, meanwhile, dredged up the president's past calls for deficit reduction and spending cuts (a stab at his support for the deficit-increasing tax bill working its way through Congress). He said the "Trump tariffs" would cause a recession later this year, claimed the president was implicated in the so-called "Epstein files," and even endorsed a call for Trump's impeachment.
To watch the feud erupt and escalate in real time is undeniably extremely entertaining political theater. The memes alone might redeem social media.
As formerly simpatico Trump and Musk partisans lined up to take sides, I couldn't help but wish that they both could win.
For all the chest-thumping and veiled accusations of human trafficking, Trump and Musk were mostly threatening to harm each other by embracing good, small government policy.
Since his role as a special government employee ended on Friday, Musk has been on a one-man crusade against the One Big Beautiful Bill that would add trillions to the national debt. He's called for tearing up the entire budget bill and starting again on something that would be more fiscally responsible.
Doing so would be a much-welcome improvement over the red-ink-soaked legislation that's been passed by the House and is currently being considered by the Senate. If Musk were able to score a win over his former government boss by killing the bill, fiscal hawks would have cause to rejoice.
Trump, for his part, said that the easiest way to find savings in the bill would be to eliminate Musk's various government contracts and subsidies.
That by itself wouldn't do too much to reduce the deficit impacts of the One Big Beautiful Bill. Nevertheless, there's no reason that the federal government should be subsidizing car buyers to purchase pricey Teslas.
While Musk's SpaceX has certainly been a cost-saving boon to the government's space operations, it would be great if this company too were forced to earn its keep from private customers in a competitive free market for rocket launches.
Musk's calls for ending Trump's destructive tariffs and even impeaching the president, whose abuses of executive power increase by the day, are similarly laudable.
There's no denying a certain ugliness that comes with a sitting president swapping petty insults with one of the country's leading entrepreneurs.
In a more perfect world, the federal government's chief executive wouldn't be going after individual businesses, and a successful industrialist would have a lot less reason to care about who's in the Oval Office.
In our current big government reality, there's nevertheless a sunny side to a crony capitalist being with a fiscally profligate president who's really bankrupting the country by abandoning free market principles.
Rent Free is a weekly newsletter from Christian Britschgi on urbanism and the fight for less regulation, more housing, more property rights, and more freedom in America's cities.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Maybe they can both win. Maybe, that’s the point.
Is this for real? Did you actually write this?
SpaceX does make money in the competitive free market for rocket launches, both private and government. Are you seriously ignorant of his private customer launches? Are you ignorant about Star Link? Do you seriously believe that if the government enters a market as a customer, that market is no longer competitive or free? Do you want to extend that nonsense to every other market involving the government, like chairs, desks, and pencils?
One of the dumbest things you’ve written recently.
Some people don’t understand anything.
All Britches would have had to do is 30 seconds of googling to see that NASA only provides roughly 7% of SpaceX’s total revenue.
SpaceX’s total revenue for the year is projected to be $15.5 billion, with NASA contributing approximately $1.1 billion.
How much comes from DoD, though? SpaceX is pretty much the only reason the FVEYs have been able to put their new satellites into orbit the last 10 years.
The lion’s share is coming from Starlink, which is what is funding it’s Starship program, then commercial and other countries, then DoD and NASA.
” a competitive free market for rocket launches.”
Yeah, think of the mom and pop rocket manufacturers.
There are quite a few other commercial private rocket launch companies. New Zealand has one, and that’s hardly a hot spot for space activity. The UK, I think, and the US has several besides Bezos’ Blue Origin. It is a good competitive free market, at least as those things go these days.
In less than 15 seconds I found the Wikipedia page that had a nice list. None are “mom and pop” but anyone wanting to send a satellite into orbit definitely has a lot of choices for who to pay to launch it.
*One of the dumbest things you’ve written recently.*
I was going to quibble, but then I saw the “recently” at the end. So you could be correct, though I still require proof.
MAGA trolls complained that the government promised to buy a lot of COVID vaccines from Pfizer, and that that made a market non-competitive.
That wasn’t true, of course, but MAGA trolls are economic idiots.
Geez, you’re dumb.
When someone responds with an *ad hominem* attack I know that I have won the argument.
What argument, that false analogy you tried?
He didn’t say your argument was wrong for being retarded. He said you were retarded. Thought you claimed to be a professor.
No. He’s right. You’re a fucking idiot.
For one thing, there were also Oxford–AstraZeneca, Sinopharm BIBP, Moderna, Janssen, CoronaVac, Covaxin, Novavax, Convidecia, Sanofi–GSK, Sputnik V, Sinopharm WIBP, Abdala, Zifivax, Corbevax, COVIran Barekat, and SCB-2019 they could have accessed.
Right now there is no orbital access provider aside from SpaceX that can meet demand.
– RocketLab can only do small stuff at the moment.
– BlueOrigin New Glenn is still in testing.
– Arianespace is five years late on their new version, Ariane 6, and has an annual launch schedule of six to seven flights, versus SpaceX’s hundreds.
– Astra is still in development.
– China Aerospace Science and Technology Corporation (CASC) won’t work for the US government.
– United Launch Alliance launched five times in 2024. Once with a rocket type that is now retired.
– Firefly Aerospace is still testing.
– And what do you think the chances are that American companies or the government will be able to launch on Roscosmos right now?
Of the 261 orbital launches worldwide last year, 134 were SpaceX.
It’s one of two things:
It’s a scripted act.
Trump outsmarted musk.
Which is more likely?
With all the boomers and lefties yanking the “For Sale” signs out of their Tesla rear windows this morning, Trump must have tricked Musk… right?
It would be funny if this was all just play acting to manipulate democrats into buying Teslas again.
yup, Trump has said many times let me be their bad guy for you and he has put up a golden dome defence
Neither.
Musk read the same deal Congress presented and walked away, while Trump didn’t. One of them has tegridy.
Musk didn’t walk away from anything. He’s not the president. He has nothing on the line other than an opinion that all the bien pensants were hating a couple of days ago.
LOL
Because they play by Highland rules: There can only be one!
And no one wants to be the Spaniard with the Scottish accent (in the movie, Sean is one of the greats even in a red loin cloth).
The red loin coth was from Zardos. Along with the black thigh high leather boots……
https://www.bridgemanimages.com/en-US/noartistknown/sean-connery-zardoz-1974-directed-by-john-boorman/film-still/asset/4062794
Yeah the old wiZARD of OZ. I got it somewhere on DVD in the house. Such a strange movie.
I watched it on Laserdisc, as God intended.
The gun is good, the penis is evil!
“I couldn’t help but wish that they both could win.”
I pray that both lose.
The Washington Post is reporting that the Trump Administration is frantically trying to rehire many of the federal workers Musk fired. Those firings left much of the federal government unable to fulfil statutory mandates. Translated, it means that the Trump Administration is breaking the law because it doesn’t have enough employees to follow the law. The many court cases it is losing is making things worse. And many of the businesses that need regulatory permission for much of their operations are desperately lobbying every Republican member of Congress to stop the nonsense; Big Business thought that it would own the government, but they are now realizing that Trump hates every business that he doesn’t run.
I pray that both lose.
Why do you hate winners?
I have not had six bankruptcies. I have not fathered children from women I am not married to. I have not cheated on my wife. I have not had to pay hush money to a porn star. I have not paid twenty billion dollars more for a social media company than the company was worth. I have not scammed people by selling them bibles at twice the cost of comparable editions, or meme coins, or crypto with no inherent value, or a car company whose stock price is vastly inflated compared to every reasonable valuation, or forced creditors to accept equity interests in money losing businesses, or tried to foment an insurrection. I consider myself a winner and would not want either Trump’s life or Musk’s life.
You haven’t lived.
I have never slept with a porn star.
I have a feeling you’ve done very little in your life.
All those things you said,” you have not”, so jealously, have you inadequate at achieving the things you want. It could what fuels your hate.
CHARLIE HALL!
The Washington Post is reporting
So, the story can be summarily dismissed.
Pretty much.
So state what is false in the article. With details.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2025/06/06/doge-staff-cuts-rehiring-federal-workers/?itid=hp-top-table-main_p001_f008
MAGA trolls are living in an alternative reality.
So state what is false in the article. With details.
The same paper that covered for Biden’s senility for five years? You’re not really in a position to be demanding burden of proof from anyone.
MAGA trolls are living in an alternative reality.
Neocon pussies relying on their lefty boos for info are speaking from lived experience.
Wouldn’t the ones be on the wapo to report more than rumors retard?
Not the statutory mandates, my god those are sacrosanct!
They can be repealed. For example, the law that says that new drugs and devices have to be proven to be safe and effective could be repealed and limits on distribution were imposed. We could return to the days when cocaine was in Coca Cola and snake oil was a common remedy for all diseases — and when life expectancy in the US was thirty years shorter than it is today. Libertarians are supposed to like freedom but there is no freedom when you are dead.
Not true. You will be free of everything.
Are you just Jodi Ernst under a pseudonym?
The problem first began with, the washington post…
Razorfist’s take.
He’s always entertaining, but a minute or two gets the flavor across.
Right… The nation is going bankrupt because DOGE and Trumps Government Cuts … which aren’t enough surely; but hardly a factor of blame. /s
One thing everyone should count on is Leftards blaming everyone but themselves for the massive DEBT Obama and Biden and their Democrat clones made. Their dependent (rely on borrowing and china) and irresponsibility (gov-guns should provide for me) mentality won’t be cut-short within their own lives. They’ll have the same baby-me mentality when it comes to taking responsibility at the government level as well.
We had a balanced budget under Clinton for four consecutive years. There was discussion of paying off the national debt. Then came Bush’s irresponsible tax cuts, Bush’s useless war in Iraq, Bush’s economic crash, Trump’s irresponsible tax cuts, Trump’s economic crash, and now another round of Trump irresponsible tax cuts. Restore government spending and taxes to Clinton levels and we will pay off the national debt.
Attempts were made to correct that. It wasn’t well received.
JUST STEAL MORE!!!!
Leftard criminal-minds are so predictable.
Hey why start/stop the time-machine at 1998, Eisenhower [R] had a surplus in 56-57,60 – Nixon [R] in 69, and Bush Jr. in 01.
Bush Jr. 1st-Term deficits 01-+128, 02-158, 03-378, 04-413 = 821
Bill Clinton 1st-Term deficits 93-255, 94-203, 95-164, 96-107 = 729
Ewh… A whole whopping $100B difference there.
Never-mind Bidens $8.5T and Obama’s $5T 1st-Term deficits….
Oh no; forget that…. Let’s all focus on that WHOLE $100B less than Bush Jr. by Clinton…… /s
Not as-if Democrats constantly pitching MORE SPENDING has anything to do with Debt huh? /s
Restore government spending and taxes to Clinton levels and we will pay off the national debt.
Restore Medicare/Medicaid to 2008 levels and we’ll pay it off. The FY24 delta equaled last year’s national deficit.
You don’t have to go back that far, you know.
No they didn’t retard. Debt increased every year under Clinton. Then the dot com bubble burst.
How are you so ignorant?