Civil Rights Groups Say Immigrants Are Being Denied Legal Access at Detention Centers
Reason confirmed reports of dysfunction and violence at one of those detention centers earlier this week.

A group of civil rights and legal organizations say immigrant detainees being held at two federal detention centers are being denied their constitutional right to legal counsel. One of those detention centers is a Miami facility flagged by Reason earlier this week for allegations of overcrowding and dysfunction.
In letters to the Trump administration released Thursday, Americans for Immigrant Justice (AIJ), the American Civil Liberties Union, and several other groups urged the administration to immediately restore detainees' access to legal counsel at Federal Correctional Institution Leavenworth (FCI Leavenworth) and Federal Detention Center-Miami (FDC Miami), two Bureau of Prisons (BOP) facilities that are holding hundreds of detainees for Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE).
According to the letters, attorneys for AIJ, Florida Legal Services, and the University of Miami Immigration Clinic "have witnessed and documented troubling systemic failures to provide individuals detained in immigration custody with access to vital legal resources and counsel" at FDC Miami.
Those deprivations include regular denial of access to legal documents, legal mail, and attorney calls. The groups say these restrictions violate detainees' due process rights under the Fifth Amendment and their First Amendment right to free speech.
"Denying detained immigrants access to legal documents, mail, and phone calls makes it all but impossible to fight and win an immigration case," AIJ Executive Director Sui Chung said in a press release. "The systemic denial of due process at FDC-Miami has impacted immigrants who desperately seek refuge and are legally entitled to pursue relief in the United States."
The letter echoes descriptions by BOP employees and immigration lawyers of poor conditions and bureaucratic chaos in FDC Miami, where roughly 400 immigrant detainees are being held on two floors. The federal prison system has struggled for years to get a handle on crumbling facilities, understaffing and low morale, and endemic corruption, but it was nevertheless pressed into service to handle the influx of detentions under Trump's mass deportation program.
A BOP employee told Reason that four of the eight elevators in the multi-story tower are broken, leading to frequent lockdowns that restrict detainees' access to phones and computers.
"I've been at FDC Miami for 16 years," Kenny Castillo, president of American Federation of Government Employees Local 501, the union representing Bureau of Prisons employees at the lockup, said. "I've never seen the building like I see it right now."
In their letter, the civil rights groups say crucial legal paperwork is going missing when detainees are transferred to and from FDC Miami. Legal mail is delayed or never arrives. They say it takes days, sometimes over a week, for attorneys to schedule a phone call with a client.
"These failures and delays have serious—potentially devastating—consequences for detained individuals' ability access and communicate with counsel, as well as their ability to apply for protection in the U.S. and to fight their cases in immigration court, as is their constitutional right."
The cumulative effect of all this is that attorneys say it's nearly impossible to plan a legal strategy for their clients.
"I had a hearing this morning, and the judge ordered me to speak with [my client]," Katie Blankenship, an attorney at Sanctuary of the South, said. "I couldn't be at FDC, and they wouldn't get me on the phone with him. I had to go to court this morning and be like, 'Sorry judge, no, I did not speak to my client, because I couldn't.'"
The dysfunction at FDC Miami erupted into a mini-riot on April 15, after the afternoon headcount dragged on for nearly five hours. A group of disgruntled detainees flooded a floor of the unit, and BOP correctional officers responded with concussive flashbang grenades.
The civil rights groups allege similar conditions at FCI Leavenworth in Kansas, where they say immigrant detainees are subjected to lengthy lockdowns, abusive use-of-force, and medical neglect.
In response to a request for comment, a BOP spokesperson said the agency is "committed to ensuring the safety and security of all inmates in our population, our staff, and the public. However, we do not comment on matters related to pending litigation, legal proceedings, or investigations."
ICE did not respond to a request for comment.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
>>In their letter, the civil rights groups say crucial legal paperwork is going missing when detainees are transferred to and from FDC Miami. Legal mail is delayed or never arrives. They say it takes days, sometimes over a week, for attorneys to schedule a phone call with a client.
lawfare from Geno's is entirely more delicious than lawfare from Pat's?
And I hear hear Geno’s is having a ‘two for one’ special on large deep dish!
I can't even eat thin crust pizza anymore I think it's mental
I’ve gotta watch the carbs and white flour, so that relegates me to thin crust.
Democrats did it first and that makes it ok?
Find a new tune Drunky.
Sort of like Clinton putting illegal immigrant children in cages back in the day.
Too bad AOC wasn't a congresswoman then.
She would've had a wonderful photo op wearing her $6,000 dress and be on the cover of Vanity Fair.
Ciaramella thinks so.
For the love of Pete,
Usually you come out with this
Crappy troll you
Kook.
You have no
Originality in your
Usual rantings.
Sarcasmic, your
Average daily trolls have
Really gotten fairly
Crummy as of recent.
Actually, they're getting really
Stale like an old, frozen
Meatloaf that been sitting
In the fridge for God knows how long and you don't want to
Cook it.
Pat’s King of Steaks has better real Philly ambience than Disney Land Gino’s. I. Like the sandwiches too. “Wit wiz”.
yes I remember Pat's being superior.
It’s wiz wit, you heathen. The wit means with onions.
And you should try one from John’s Roast Pork. It’s a religious experience.
Illegal Aliens. Fixed it.
Given Reason’s track record of (lack of) veracity in immigration stories, I’m going to assume that this is story is at least largely bullshit.
Squandering credibility can be a bitch.
I have to agree. My first reaction was disbelief. I've been disillusioned so much by all the reporting on this issue, a substantial portion was incomplete, and the biggest headlines actively false. I don't know if it was even worthwhile reading it. Since I don't know if I trust a word that was said.
Civil Rights Groups Say you better take the covid vax
Civil Rights Groups Say gun rights are not individual rights
Civil Rights Groups Say "immigrants" instead of illegal border crossers.
Civil Rights Groups Say men should be allowed in women-only spaces
Civil Rights Groups Say all kinds of shit that isn't true.
All of those are opinions, not facts that are true or false.
NOPE, gun rights are individual rights, FACT, not opinion ,at least in the USA.
Immigrants are those who come legally, illegal border crosser is the factually correct description, Not opinion either.
So these are facts , not opinions and you can easily know true from false.......
So it turns out it is your comment that is the only a flawed opinion.
Yes, the magic 2A that is clearly about individual rights despite it not saying anything about individual rights and specifying it is about militias.
You’ve never read the Federalist Papers, or anything else written by the founders, have you? It is absolutely about individual gun ownership, and ‘militia’ has a different meaning in context than what it does in the 21st century. But as a democrat, you are ann ignorant, vapid, retarded peace of shit that won’t learn things, and wouldn’t be honest about them if you did.
Now fuck off Tony, m’kay?
When the war comes, we will find out which side is better with guns.
Be careful what you wish for Molly, you might just get it; just not how you want it.
soy boy beta males vs men
yeah....it will turn out just like the last time with the Democrats losing.
Did you just condone the fire bombing and cold blooded cowardly murders we've recently seen from the psychos on your side being fed by your hate mongering overlords?
My side is largely proficient in the use of fire arms. Are you? Got any hand to had combat training? A basic understanding of tactical warfare?
Have you ever even been in a real fight? And how did things work out when an entire rioting mob of democrats went after Kyle Rittenhouse?
Yeah, let’s see what happens.
The PhD doesn’t know what a prefatory clause is, nor what is meant by “the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.”
Hahahahahahahahahaha
Jesus. Do you really need to be schooled on this subject?
Reason really needs to drop their immigration coverage. It's the worst part of the magazine.
MAGAs would love that. Instead of facing Trump's crimes, you just don't report on them.
What crimes?
Insider trading for starts. He did that out in public and bragged about it.
What insider trading? Do you have a cite? Or is it his just your usual unsupported claims you puke up, and them run away?
Tony seems to be a really dumb fucking person.
What insider trading?
When you publicly tell people to buy your beautiful bitcoin, that’s totes insider trading or something!
I don’t even know what he’s talking about. Since when has Trump been a big stock trader?
Do you not understand that this is a *libertarian* publication, and that libertarians believe in free movement of peoples? If you don't agree, you're more than welcome to find some reich-wing anti-freedom publication more to your liking.
"Immigrants." That's called begging the question. Which is, of course, the default position of 'reason' on anything. The behavior of the "detainees" at the FDC proves that they shouldn't be here in the first place. I really wish someone from 'reason' would explain how these people are going to benefit the United States -- more bad drywallers? More lame street tacos? More U.S. citizens killed?
Their right to due process and a lawyer is not dependent on their benefit to the US. If so, I would happily kick your ass to Russia.
You still dont understand what due process means. Amazing.
A deportation is an administrative hearing. There is no trial or jury. To just a hearing. If they are an illegal, they get sent home. You are claiming legal rights that don’t exist under the law.
But this won’t sink in. You will still lie, and scream about how every single illegal is entitled to a jury trial just to be deported, along with endless appeals.
The right to due process and a lawyer was honored. They had a lawyer. The problem was that the lawyer didn’t go see their “client”.
"I had a hearing this morning, and the judge ordered me to speak with [my client]," Katie Blankenship, an attorney at Sanctuary of the South, said. "I couldn't be at FDC, and they wouldn't get me on the phone with him. I had to go to court this morning and be like, 'Sorry judge, no, I did not speak to my client, because I couldn't.'"(Emphasis mine)
Even pro bono lawyers have an obligation to the courts and their clients, including following judge’s orders that are in the best interest of their client. Why couldn't you speak to your client, specifically?
Why couldn’t you be at the FDC? Did you not want to go to the dirty jail? Are you hundreds of miles away? How about the details of how much time there was between the judge’s order and the hearing? Did you only have 20 minutes to try to talk to your client, or a week? Did you wait until the last minute and then demand that the FDC put your client on the phone, or was the request made well in advance? Did they reject your request because they're evil, or because they couldn't accommodate your exact schedule?
I know Reason isn’t much for questioning those with whom they agree, but they actually spoke to this person, according to the other story from Reason they linked to. Ask the follow up questions, Reason! Don't stop asking questions when you get the quote you want. It's lazy and/or bullshit reporting like this that clearly displays their bias.
Reason now engages exclusively in lazy, dishonest, bullshit reporting. They’ve squandered every last drop of their credibility to inanely advocate for open borders and to serve the democrat agenda..
Thank you for saying this better than I ever could.
I have heard countless cases of pro-bono lawyers being given mere minutes with their clients. That's a problem. But I'm not trusting that this is the case on assertion, much less when they don't even assert it.
Oh Shit.
https://www.scotusblog.com/2025/05/supreme-court-allows-dhs-to-end-parole-for-a-half-million-noncitizens/
Is the Reason romance with federal judges in peril? Or are they still dreamy.
Well I don't know the details here and Reason's coverage is useless. But if these individuals are being held at a deportation facility then It's reasonable to assume that they have a deportation order and are just (have mercy) waiting for the bus all day. Judges and lawyers can attempt to delay the inevitable but as a practical matter they only succeed in overcrowding and delays.
“ then It's reasonable to assume that they have a deportation order”
No, it really isn’t. The Trump administration has a history of putting people in detention without bothering to figure out if they were actually supposed to be there. And, of course, then trying to keep them from getting due process.
Cite?
If I catch an intruder in my home, should I let him call his lawyer before or after the barrel of my baseball bat is accelerating?
This country is not your private property. MAGAs are a death cult, and they don't care who they kill. Violent fucks.
Violent? Nearly all murderers are democrat. And your kind spent the summer of 2020 killing lots of people during your race riots. And as of late, more and more of you democrat filth are executing people in public. Just look at the recent cases of Luigi Mansgione, and Elias Gonzalez.
Face it fag, democrats are all murdering pedophile trash.
Now fuck off Tony, m’kay?
Yes, because the far left Antifa goons and the Pink/Tranny Mafia is never violent.
All these articles just radicalize me to say "fuck all of them. Send all the illegals to South Sudan for all I care."
I'm not sure why the writers feel they have done anything here besides show readers that there is a vast system to force foreigners on Americans and subvert the law. I am less sympathetic to illegal immigrants because of how Reason covers immigration. This also goes for druggies, hobos, and just about every group they choose to cover sympathetically.
I think you've hit on an important feature of both the coverage here and the nature of humanity in a pervasive environment of gaslighting.
Make no mistake, your reaction is the one you'd expect of any rational person when they know they're being gaslit. It is a self defense mechanism to push back.
You were always this way, Reason’s coverage isn’t changing anything for you.
You can’t separate support for due process and the Constitution from support for illegal immigration. That’s your failure, no one else’s.
If you believe in this country and the legal foundation of the Constitution, you should be horrified by the attempts of the Trump administration to circumvent the Bill of Rights.
I agree with you about illegal immigrants. I have no problem with deporting illegal immigrants. It’s a good thing. But you can’t ignore due process to do it.
How can you fail to ignore the fact these folks were already given the due process they are afforded by and is required by law?
They don't keep getting additional due process, more court hearings etc, when they don't like the outcome of the immigration judges decision.
And of course there's the criminals who were convicted. Due process was given, they were convicted and can be removed because of their crimes. There is no additional due process.
There's no explanation of who these people are, what crimes they committed beyond illegally entering the country. But you can bet it wasn't a good crime when they are in Leavenworth.
Just think. If Democrats would secure the F'En border none of this would be an issue.
This is just like looters crying after being caught.
Sadly the looters had Kamala Harris and the DNC psychos to bail them out and encourage them to continue being violent thieves. And somehow this actually happens and not only is allowed to continued but is accepted by the media and ignored by prosecutors and judges.
You don't give a shit when they invade this country in hordes and even cheer the NGOs and administration that games the system and abuses Americans, so fuck them and fuck you.
“Immigrant” is just REASON-Speak for illegal alien.
Steven Miller murdered Pamela Brown on live television over that today.
https://x.com/BreitbartNews/status/1928475916604203211
Those deprivations include regular denial of access to legal documents, legal mail, and attorney calls.
They're overwhelmed. You're implying malicious intent where Occam's Razor gives us logistical infeasibility.
There's just too many illegals. Who do we have to thank for that, again?
If only there were some way to not go there, like ... not illegally entering or staying in the US.
"leading to frequent lockdowns that restrict detainees' access to phones and computers."
My heart weeps for them.
Illegal Aliens have NO access to constitutional rights. They are ILLEGAL ALIENS. Get it? Got it? good!
They are not citizens. They are ILLEGAL ALIENS and they are not welcome here.
ICE needs to get busy and deport them in the thousands every day. Jail the gang bangers and other criminals.
They get an administrative deportation hearing. And if they are not here legally, that’s it. They get sent back.
Democrat fags here can whine all they want, but that is how the law works.
Case closed.
Confirmed *reports of*?