Bob Menendez Does Not Deserve a Pardon
The disgraced former Democratic senator was convicted of accepting almost $1 million in bribes in exchange for, among other things, favors benefiting foreign governments.

"People talk about the Trump [Department of Justice] DOJ," Bob Menendez, the disgraced former senator from New Jersey, posted on X Friday, "but it was the Democrats who started weaponizing the Justice Dept."
People talk about the Trump DOJ, but it was the Democrats who started weaponizing the Justice Dept. When, as the Chairman of the SFRC, I didn't go along with Obama's Iran deal, I was indicted, and the next day after being stripped of my position, Obama announced the Iran deal.
— Senator Bob Menendez (@SenatorMenendez) May 30, 2025
The timing of that message was interesting. Menendez, a Democrat, is scheduled to report to federal prison on June 17, after a jury convicted him of accepting almost $1 million in bribes in exchange for, among other things, favors that benefited foreign governments.
The scheme was extensive. Menendez—along with his wife, Nadine—took gold bars, $480,000 in cash, and a $60,000 Mercedes-Benz convertible from three New Jersey businessmen, who, in return, had Menendez leverage the power of his office in a litany of corrupt ways. That included helping secure hundreds of millions of dollars in military aid to Egypt; assisting Egyptian-American entrepreneur Wael Hana in preserving a monopoly granted to him by that same country; attempting to influence multiple criminal investigations in a way that would satisfy two of his bribers; and promoting the interests of Qatar so that New Jersey real estate developer Fred Daibes could lock down a multi-million dollar investment from a fund associated with the Qatari government. This list is not exhaustive.
The former senator was convicted last year on all 16 counts, which included bribery, honest services wire fraud, obstruction of justice, and acting as a foreign agent, among several others. A judge sentenced him to 11 years in prison, which was, in some sense, a break, considering that the federal sentencing guidelines recommended a minimum of 24 years in prison. (His wife was convicted last month on all counts—15 in her case—and is scheduled to be sentenced in June.)
Menendez's Friday post coincides not only with his looming prison sentence but also with the spate of pardons recently granted by President Donald Trump. It's understandable why the former senator would want to pull out all the stops here. Prison, to put it mildly, sucks. Trump should still decline to indulge him.
Whether or not the president will be moved remains unclear. Among his recent pardons is Paul Walczak, an executive who was convicted of withholding millions of dollars in taxes from his employees' paychecks and then keeping the funds for himself. His pardon came shortly before he was to report to prison for an 18-month sentence—and after his mother attended a Trump fundraiser dinner at Mar-a-Lago, where, according to the invitation, admission cost $1 million. But perhaps more analogous to Menendez's situation is the pardon given to Scott Jenkins, the disgraced former Virginia sheriff who, in exchange for cash payments, gave out auxiliary deputy sheriff badges so recipients could invoke special privileges.
It is not exactly a mystery why the pardon power's reputation is in the toilet. The problem is a bipartisan one—former President Joe Biden, for his part, issued preemptive pardons for his family members, Anthony Fauci, and others, which does not exactly instill confidence in the rule of law. Neither does pardoning people who sufficiently endear themselves to the chief executive. Pardon Attorney Ed Martin captured those motivations best on X: "No MAGA left behind," he wrote Monday, as he thanked Trump for pardoning Jenkins.
But the pardon power, for all the negative attention it has received in recent months, can be an incredible tool for good. It is effectively the only lever to check overzealous prosecutors and unjust sentences in the federal system. Some of Trump's pardons make the case for this. Most famously there was Alice Marie Johnson, who was sentenced to life in prison without the possibility of parole in the '90s for her role as a drug mule in a cocaine ring; Trump initially commuted her sentence and later pardoned her in 2020. Listed in the latest round of pardons were John Moore and Tanner Mansell, two Florida diving instructors who were convicted of theft after freeing sharks they thought had been caught illegally—which, as Reason's Jacob Sullum notes, was a bizarre misuse of the discretion afforded to prosecutors.
That is the sort of thing clemency is for: to give a lifeline to people who may have been railroaded by the government, which sometimes gets creative and fanatical in its attempts to punish people. It is not supposed to be a get-out-of-jail-free card for well-connected, powerful people who can flatter the president. After all, Menendez, as a senator, was one of the most powerful people in the country. His case was not an example of politicizing justice, though a pardon would be.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
I don't remember this response to the pardons of the Biden crime family for much worse in both crimes and pardons. But yes, this criminal earned his spot in prison.
You mean the author is a hypocrite for not criticizing Biden”s pardons, and that excuses Trump’s.
Never thought of it that way.
You almost had it right.
You mean the author is a hypocrite for not criticizing Biden”s pardons,
and that excuses Trump’s.Sarcasmic is a hypocrite for not criticizing Biden's pardons.
sarcasmic is a tool for evil
First guy ever to become a Nazi solely because he was mad at white people who made fun of him on the internet.
He lives in 97% white Maine. Probably a lot of white people make fun of him there too.
He’s the weird guy kids throw rocks at.
There's the problem... this individual does actually think, one way or another rather than not at all. It therefore follows--as night follows day--that all the nameless Christian National Socialist brownpants assigned by God's Own Prohibitionists to defecate and dead-cat Reason magazine articles HAVE to upend the boiling wrath of their two-minutes' hate on the wrongthinkful heretic. They truly have no choice in the matter.
We can only hope for Libertarian spoiler votes.
I do remember Reason criticizing the Biden pardons. But you might be excused for not noticing them because they were so closely lumped together at the end of Biden's term. But that's an artifact of Biden's choice to be stingy with pardons until the very end when (I suspect he hoped) the media would be distracted - whereas Trump is making them (so far) throughout his term in office and people have time to investigate, report on and read about them.
Oh come on. Those articles contradict the narrative. That means they don’t exist.
Or the pardon for fauci and his crimes against humanity
When is Pocahontas getting convicted?
When she commits a crime.
She committed perjury on her Harvard aplication
Perjury? On a college application? Not in the US judicial system, I bet.
Nah, Fauxcahontas identifies as trans-Indian. (Feather, not Dot)
Like insider trading or something? Or does it have to be a phony one like obtaining a loan legally or filling out the correct spot on your taxes?
How about just being a shrill cunt?
Certainly the government wouldn’t concoct fake evidence against her. Right?
Of course Menendez doesn't deserve a pardon. But Trump should be in prison for taking a bribe that was hundreds of times larger. But MAGA worships him as a King.
What bribe are you referring to? Asshole.
Tell us about this "bribe". What is it? Spell it out.
He got 35 mil from the ccp and then sold the Chinese oil from the strategic reserve at lower then market prices. At least I think it was 45, it may have been 46 or 47.
I heard Trump took bribes from a Ukrainian oil company and then ran it through a bunch of shell companies under the pseudonyms "Robert Peters, Robin Ware, and JRB Ware"... well it was probably Trump.
If it was someone else I'm sure Reason would've mentioned it.
Is there any indication that Trump has any interest in pardoning this guy? If not this article seems like a tragic waste of pixels. I recently became aware that a woman named Villareal is in danger of having her first amendment rights violated. No really. Meanwhile in a David V Goliath battle, heroic judges are determined to put gang members on the streets of Anytown USA. Libertarians cheer in unison. And tariffs? Don't even get me started. I'm left to wonder who exactly is in charge here. Libertarians are hungry for food trucks and buttsex and reefer and Mexicans and all we get is speculation about pardons. Sad.
I think this is to hedge criticism after the one-sided and inaccurately portrayed article about Trump pardoning that VA sherriff. Menendez isn't currently relevant outside of that contrast. This article is years too late considering the Menendez corruption stuff came out a long time ago.
That actually makes sense.
We're supposed to believe that Sen. Menendez's behavior was unusual? He failed to pay someone, or made someone angry, so they threw him under the bus.
Menendez committed the same crime as Eric Adams and Rod Blagojevich, he wandered off the Democratic Party reservation and tried to do his own thing and was fraudulently railroaded into prison for it.
The Democrats are even harder on heretics than blasphemers.
Devout believers and evangelicals are always this way.
I don't think he was 'fraudulently railroaded' since he was ultimately super guilty of all the charges.
Fact is, they choose not to make it an issue until he did something they told him not to 'or else'.
If Menendez hadn't been breaking the law, they wouldn't have had the 'or else' in their pocket. Hell, this isn't even the first time this shit bag was investigated for this exact thing. He was guilty then but he was useful. Guess that usefulness wore out.
Menendez crossed the Democrat Rubicon by engaging in WrongThink, as Adams did. This will never be tolerated, punishable by political death and imprisonment. The war against Eurasia is too important for division in the ranks.
Well to bad Billy, your boy Biden fucked that up.
among other things, favors benefiting foreign governments.
Don't really know who this guy is, don't much care, but uhh, the above stuck out for me. Foreign social constructs... I mean, what really is a foreign government and aren't we all like, one people, man?
What's so funny about peace love and understanding?
Sometimes understanding makes peace and love more difficult.
Oh look.... Electing sheriffs who make campaign promises to Gov-Gun down others to STEAL for you under some ?free? lunch criminalistic idea (Hut hum; Democrats) = a 'government' full of illegal corruption.
Gosh.. Who woulda thunk-it... /s
This is the anti-pardon article?
Reason is a clown show.
How much more anti-libertarian can Reason get before they say fuck it and merge with Jacobin?
I’m surprised they don’t bring back Shitty Shikha, or even hire Taylor Lorenz.
or even hire Taylor Lorenz
Ow! that's going to leave a mark!
"Judge not, lest ye be judged."
Oh, wait, ill-informed and malicious judgment is the complete and only basis of lubbertarianism.
"but it was the Democrats who started weaponizing the Justice Dept."
Is he wrong?
It goes to show how dumb and guileless the Dems are. God's Own Populist, on the other hand, engaged in treason, bribery, wire fraud, obstruction of justice, acting as a foreign agent, vandalism and--with his Trumpanzee Court--denying pregnant women individual rights, and was given a spanking-new jumbo jet courtesy of a religious monarch. The Dems could've gotten that jet and all associated pelf, boodle and payola by having their doddering geezer pardon Ross Ulbricht on May 2, six months before the election. How stupid is that?
Well thank God the Libertarian candidate saved the republic. Right Hank? Right!!!???
Boy, looks like there's a lot of Middle Eastern agents, Marxists, and Jew haters in the democrat party, huh? They willingly did "undemocratic" things to prop up Biden to stop Trump?
But I'm supposed to let these people who condone actual bigotry stay in power to stop mean old Trump from deporting people. No.