Trump's Tariffs Are Starting To Kill Jobs
Goldman Sachs estimates that the tariffs will create about 100,000 manufacturing jobs while destroying 500,000 others. In Pennsylvania, it's already starting.

The Trump administration believes that high tariffs will boost the prospects of American manufacturing, but one iconic truck company is now preparing to lay off hundreds of workers—because of the tariffs.
For more than a century, the Mack Trucks plant on the outskirts of Allentown, Pennsylvania, has been churning out heavy equipment to haul stuff from place to place. It is one of the largest employers in the region, providing hundreds of the good-paying, blue-collar jobs that President Donald Trump and his allies want to promote in America.
Some of those jobs are about to disappear. Mack Trucks will lay off between 250 and 350 workers over the next few weeks, the Pennsylvania Capital-Star reports. A company spokesperson told the Capital-Star that the layoffs are due to "market uncertainty about freight rates and demand" and "the impact of tariffs."
Of course, one of the impacts of tariffs is increased economic uncertainty and decreased demand for products like the ones Mack Trucks makes. That's a tidy illustration of how higher tariffs are hurting American businesses in more ways than one: higher prices for imported goods and component parts on the front end, coupled with lower sales expectations on the back end. In an environment like that, layoffs seem almost inevitable.
As that dynamic plays out across the whole economy, the tariffs will create more losers than winners. A Goldman Sachs report published this week estimates that Trump's tariffs will create about 100,000 new manufacturing jobs (a result of supply chains shifting to the U.S., as the president wants) but will destroy 500,000 other jobs in the process.
That would reflect what happened during Trump's first term, when his tariffs cost about 245,000 American jobs, by one estimate.
More layoffs are almost certainly coming.
"A lot of companies are definitely going to go under, that's for sure," Molson Hart, CEO of Viahart, an educational toy company, told The Atlantic's Derek Thompson this week.
"Firms expect conditions to worsen in the months ahead," the New York Federal Reserve noted in its April survey of manufacturers, which showed "a level of pessimism that has only occurred a handful of times in the history of the survey."
Ryan Petersen, CEO of Flexport, a global logistics firm, warned in a series of posts on X that ocean freight bookings from China are down 50 percent since Trump's tariffs hit. That could potentially wipe out as much as $1 trillion in economic activity if the tariffs remain in place for a full year, he estimated.
"Thousands, and then millions, of American small businesses, including many iconic brands, will go bankrupt this year if the tariff policies on China don't change," Petersen wrote.
The stock market might have been the first to respond to the consequences of Trump's tariffs, but the damage was always going to be more widespread. American workers are about to end up on the front lines of the president's trade war.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
OMG! You mean if you buy something next door instead of half-way around the world it requires less labor?
The real question is what kind of 'Central Planning' F'Up made it so buying something half-way around the world was more efficient that buying it next door.
The efficiency of digging holes to fill them back in?
Mises' "Human Action", chapter 7, part 3: Division of Labor
TJ has made it abundantly clear that he refuses to learn anything about economics, and instead prefers to remain willfully ignorant of the subject. So terms like division of labor, comparative advantage and opportunity cost are all meaningless to him, and he intends to keep it that way. He believes that ignorance is strength.
How many of yours or Eric's predictions have come true again?
They’re both retards. JeffSarc and the other fags here raving like idiots reminds of Scott Jennings’ segments on CNN. Which Dave Rubin has informally titled ‘Scott and the Retards’.
Every-time I try to 'learn' you some economics you resort to personal attacks, blind-insistence/arrogance of an even blinder (distracted) list of banner phrases and then a show of ignorance of the debate at hand.
Self-Projection ... because it's what you do best.
Liar. You've never tried to learn anything about economics. You are willfully ignorant and proud of it.
Sarcasian projection detected.
He’s constantly corrected, with evidence. Yet he still (drunkenly) makes the same discredited claims. All the retards here do.
Liar. You've never tried to learn anything about economics. You are willfully ignorant and proud of it.
Sarc looked in the mirror as he typed that one.
Hey, you chicken shit MAGA tapeworm. You dodged the AM links where one of your violent Cult murderers was called out for his Florida shootings. You are partly culpable for inciting these Trump morons.
So after literally scores and scores of leftist, homo, tranny, illegal shooters, you FINALLY see (allegedly) a republican who lost his shot and shot some people, and somehow all violence is on the right?
Cool story Kiddie Raper. But it won’t save you from prison after I take Reason over and dox you.
Fuck off, you chubby Denny Hastert conservative cuck.
Project much, pedo?
Hay cunt, you’re the one who attempted to peddle child pornography here, not any of us.. you are a pariah.
I also noticed that you have absolutely no response to what I said. Because I’m right, you’re wrong, and that’s the end of the story.
And again, tick tock, your time is running out Kiddie Raper.
LOL... UR so busy calling me willfully ignorant and proud you didn't even realize that was an accusation of you not willing to learn anything. Twice! You literally filled in the proof with your response.
Pretty sure Mises "Division of Labor" concept doesn't say adding 1000+ miles of shipping makes everything more efficient.
I don't recall Mises talking about slave labor.
No central planning just basic economics as outlined by Adam Smith. The late 1900's saw a transition from an American dominated economy to a world economy. Other countries began developing better and cheaper products. American capitalist saw the advantage of outsourcing production and focusing locally on developing products and sales. The reality is that time just caught up with American manufacturing and a natural leveling occurred. These are changes that cannot really be undone. Remember also that a lot of manufacturing does occur in the American, but the dominance is gone and gone for good.
Surely the ZERO-Tax + Subsidized Shipping for 'imports' didn't have anything to do with it.. /s
Topped with endless Gov Labor entitlement mandates ... Regulated wage, hours, paid leave, etc, etc...
Topped with a ?Green? monster campaign who's literal purpose is to shut-down domestic manufacturing.
Topped with a party who indoctrinates HATRED for any US success by calling it greedy and demanding THEFT from it.
Of course; none of that has made any difference.
And if it did ... It's all Trumps Fault anyways! /s
You are right none of what you listed made any difference. What happened is that basic economic rules worked as expected. Other countries began producing goods that were better and a better value for money. Foreign counties built modern factories while American manufacturing plants aged. Countries began to price their natural resources at market rates rather simple accepting what Americans wanted to pay. It not Trump fault but Trump cannot rewrite the natural laws of economic either.
[Na]tional So[zi]al[ism] didn't kill anyone./s
It's just basic/natural economics. /s
You leftards are literally delusional.
A friend of mine owns a trucking company. He's also a disappointed Trump supporter.
He hauls lumber to the NY ports for export to China. He said he all of those orders cancelled and is expecting much decreased business as long as the tariffs remain in place. He had 2 trucks ordered for this spring, but was thinking he had to cancel those orders.
His company struggled through the COVID issues and was just getting back up to speed. He'll be fine, I'm sure, but his drivers, not so much.
Just an FYI: Trump doesn't set China Tariffs.
China makes that decision all on it's own.
Uh huh. Weird they decided to add so many tariffs right after Trump though. Who could have predicted...
Not economically retarded assholes like TJJ2000, Jesse et. al.
Certainly not the economically leftarded who one second insists American Tariffs only hurt Americans and the next second insists China Tariffs only hurt Americans.
Tariffs do hurt the country imposing them. Without US tariffs there would be no china tariffs in retaliation. The difference here is that our president decided to disrupt US trade with nearly everyone while failing to grasps that we needed his pilrimary target way more than they need us. Sure they're suffer but they have way more options open than we do. Plenty of countries would be happy to step in and buy the things that made the US prosperous for their own people.
You know what else hurts the country imposing them?
Domestic Taxes.
Our president didn't disrupt US trade.
He literally Tax-Cut and De-Regulated it.
Our president disrupted the Tax-Exemption (and subsidized shipping) on Foreign Goods.
Black-taping over the root-problem "needing China way more than they need us" ... because China Goods are Tax-Exempt with Subsidized shipping ... while US-Goods are taxed up-to 85% isn't a solution that leads to a beneficial end for the US at all.
Which is precisely the problem this administration is addressing.
The status-quo of leftard "New Deals" for the US has bankrupted it.
China already has lots of tariffs you dumb bitch.
I had a micro trucking business that I retired from a year and a half ago and I'm sure your friend will agree that trucking has been in a recession for well over 2 years. That's why I finally got out, the rates were cut to the bone and it just wasn't worth it any more. Thousands of small carriers and a few mega carriers have been bankrupted for reasons that have nothing to do with Trump. I'm sorry to hear your friend's customers are affected by tariffs but honestly government policy always creates winners and losers and the trucking business has always been feast and famine. As far as buying new trucks goes the biggest issue is EPA regulatory mandates that have increased costs by tens of thousands and produced machines that are less efficient than they were 20 years ago with maintenance costs doubled. Your buddy would be better off with a 25 year old glider for half the price.
Exactly. Some large trucking companies have already gone under such as YRC.
Thanks. I'm not really familiar with the trucking business other than talking to this guy, but what you're saying makes sense.
I'm sure the flood of illegal drivers who aren't even legally qualified helped with those rates. Meanwhile trucking caused fatalities climbed.
Indeed. Obama's EPA diesel mandates practically killed the US diesel market which is exactly what the Democrats agenda was.
But if Democrats agenda show any signs of working....
...but, but, but ... It's all Trumps Fault! /s
Here's the deal:
No one is defending Obama here so who gives a fuck? Government is bad for business. Up until Trump, dems were worse, but Trump just flipped the balance by adopting leftist planned economy policies
So Obama's emissions mandates are bad for trucking. OK great. We agree. Trump just adds tariffs with associated regulations ON TOP of existing regulations and further decimated the trucking industry.
I'm consistent. Obama's regulations are bad for business. Taxes are bad for business. Trump's taxes are bad for business. Trump's regulations are bad for business.
Keep in mind, when you bring up a whatabout argument or a butbutbut Obama was bad too, you already lost the argument.
Trump is the state and you are a statist.
WHAT Trump's taxes are bad for business.
WHAT Trump's regulations are bad for business.
Trump Cut-Taxes and did/is De-Regulating.....
Is your fantasy-land imagination filling in for reality or what?
With the current DEBT there has to be some taxing and a whole lot spending cuts (hut hum: DOGE).
It's like you're completely blind to what is happening.
WHAT Trump's taxes are bad for business. Easy question tariffs, tariffs are taxes that interfere with trade.
WHAT Trump's taxes are bad for business.
Ummmm tariffs
WHAT Trump's regulations are bad for business.
Ummm tariffs
Trump Cut-Taxes and did/is De-Regulating.....
Largest tax hike in recent history
^The tunnel-vision parrots of party-selective ignorance.
"With the current DEBT there has to be some taxing and a whole lot spending cuts"
No sympathy. He voted to diminish his business.
OK. That's nice.
How's that?
Because he didn't vote for "Gov-Gun STEALING of his greedy corporation" crowd?
Explains the terrible job numbers...oh wait.
Remember how you complained that job numbers didn't mean anything when Biden was president because they were being manipulated? I do. All you Trump defenders did. And rightly so. But now they're sacrosanct because Trump is president? Oh please.
Those claims will return to us very soon.
Yep. When the job numbers stink due to Trump dropping a wrecking ball on the economy, his defenders will shriek about how the numbers are wrong. No principles. Just tribal loyalty.
You and qb with the usual bullshit and misrepresentations because you were consistently proven wrong. Lol.
Here is a perfect place to use some of your bookmarks to back up your claim that you've consistently proved me wrong. Hell, how about 1?
That would be honest, and honesty isn't in his programming.
Lol. You two fucking clowns. Always projecting.
Jesse deflecting as usual. Can't provide even one bookmark. Lying piece of shit gonna lie.
Stop lying, fag. You’re a dishonest retard yourself.
Do any of you leftists know the definitions of words? God damn you're guys should all go back to school. And not public ones which failed you.
Why do all you retards pick up the same lame insults?
It will be good when the public starts demanding republicans bring back McCarthyism. That should begin after the democrats escalate their violent activities nationwide this summer. All while they scream to repatriate illegals who are members of terror groups and shove more of this tyranny shit down everyone’s throats. Which doesn’t appear to be al that popular among their own voters. At least outside of the full on red diaper baby set.
Humorously. The very reason you ask for 'bookmarks' from Jesse is because he has provided 'bookmarks' historically proving who the lying hypocritical POS's are.
If leftards couldn't self-project; they have nothing at all.
I don’t bookmark your drivel, but you are constantly wrong.
Maybe it just goes over your smooth brain.
You really want to go there? I’ve observed you for some time now. Your intellect is obviously inferior, and are certainly no match for me cognitively.
Fucking lol, my dog is way smarter than you, shitstain.
Your intellect is obviously inferior, and are certainly no match for me cognitively.
Claiming it is worth nothing. Prove it. Take on my arguments instead of just insulting me.
Remember how we showed you the two different surveys to show how the fed projections were bullshit? But you kept using them. Remember how we showed you the "corrected numbers" matching our comments and you ignored them? Remember we showed you the percentage of government jobs were in those numbers?
Remember retard?
show us the bookmark or stfu
I was told the use of bookmarks was a problem of some kind.
Jesse speaks the truth, fag.
Hey man, youre the one that claims to be a 'town drunk and gay for booze'. Not that there's anything wrong with that
Hey shrike! You were the one embarrassed multiple times the last few years on job reports. You're so embarrassed you got a new sock.
It is amazing watching you idiots deny your posts as if they disappear. The left just can't be honest.
That’s fair. Let’s wait two weeks and see if they’re adjusted down and the media says fuck all about it.
So you report projections instead of the actual job reports? Seems a weird habit.
As we all know economic projections never reflect the biases or beliefs of those who make the projections.
Mack Trucks will lay off between 250 and 350 workers over the next few weeks,
This is clearly Biden's fault.
IF the economy had not been so strong they would never have had those jobs. 100% on Biden.
(wingnut logic)
Mack Trucks has TDS.
Ideas™ !
That really pisses him off.
market uncertainty about freight rates and demand
You're in the god-damned trucking business, an entirely domestic one at that (in the sense that it's how we ship items to stores).
As peoples preferences change, you mean to tell me that there won't be an explosion of demand domestically?
GTFO.
As I said above trucking has always been feast or famine and rates have been barely above cost for over 2 years. Over 10,000 carriers before Trump took office.
Deregulation did it. And society benefits.
No fag, it was regulation. You’re probably dumb enough that crippling regulations help business.
Do you believe that, fag?
Goddamn son.
Who wants to bet if it wasn't for Socialist Labor Laws and Minimum Wage Laws and Benefit Laws .....
Mack Trucks wouldn't be laying off anyone?
Okay so tell the union workers at Mack that they are now making minimum wage with no benefits.
You're very confused, fag. You see, most union contracts use minimum wage as a variable in the formula for their member’s compensation. So that $45/hr. auto plant assembly lime worker gets a raise when minimum wage goes up. This is only one distortion.
Does that clear things up for you, fag?
Or maybe Mack can tell them; This is what we can offer as pay each Individual Employee can then *choose* for themselves to keep their job at that rate or quite.
Something, something about having CHOICE and LIBERTY.
Instead of telling them they got fired because 3rd-party socialist leftards voted to have Gov-Guns against them decide that for them.
Unplugging from the WEF/globalist led world will not be painless in the short term, but it is necessary for the future. We can no longer tolerate a world dominated by the likes of Soros and Schwab. That world needs to end; it needs to die. China (oddly enough) seems to get it, as does Russia. Europe still has its collective heads up its collective asses. Out if this will be a new multipolar world, as we used to have prior to WWII, and especially prior to WWI. Births are painful, but rewarding.
You really are a MAGA moron.
Globalism has made the US rich and you want to kill the Golden Goose.
You are a WEF stooge, pedo.
He may or may not be a stooge but he is 100 percent correct.
No fag, he’s not. But hey, defending the child porn peddling Sorosite is a really good look for you.
Sit down, shut up, and eat your bugs. Turn in all your belongings...You will own nothing and you will be happy...or else.
So, so, so, so rich the USA is literally on the verge of bankruptcy...
Everyone saw what you socialist leftards did to Venezuela.
I’ll tell all my architect and engineer friends who keep getting outbid by people in China, India, and Pakistan that they’re actually rich.
And for the cherry-on-top.
Remind them to pay their ($36.7T / 167M) $219,760 Gov-Gun 'armed-theft' sympathy-for-criminals bill to D.C. Democrats.
Have faith in the genius. It's all part of the plan.
Many, many people make their livings in businesses involved in importing and exporting goods. Should they be prosecuted for treason?
They should be gov-billed (taxed) the same as any domestic manufacturing is gov-billed + pay for any International Affairs governing related to their market.
Instead of insisting on a ZERO-Tax exemption, subsidized shipping and making Domestic pick-up the entire International Affairs governing costs.
Frankly; The dispute really sits on WHO has to pay for the UN-Constitutional Socialist Spending Democrats have created. If the USA wasn't on the verge of bankruptcy it wouldn't have to recover enough to matter so much. Literally tax/regulation-crippling US production (value) in the face of 'exempted' status for 'imports' just makes the WHO is going to pay-it-off more scarce.
Perhaps Art Vandelay could way in on this subject
I thought he was in latex?
Don't forget, on precedent, Trump will be able to crow about "jobs saved", making up any numbers he wants to because there's zero way to account for that.
It's OK, Dems did it first!
Unlike the Dems. I don't think Trump is going to pitch, push and pass a $1.9T ARPA bill off onto ?Greedy? Resource Producing America's to save sit-on-couch-all-day-and-do-nothing jobs.
But if he does; He'll be a POS for doing so just like Biden and Democrats have been over and over and over again by insisting the 'poor' is but a skin-color/gender/class DNA issue that requires *special entitlements* to Gov-Gun STEAL from others instead of a symptom of being UN-productive and lazy and some baseline CRIMINAL belief that one doesn't have to *EARN* what they need/desire they can just STEAL it.
Moreover, many of those 500,000 lost jobs pay better than $17/hr tedious assembly jobs.