Tariff Uncertainty Is Stalling the Economy
Businesses are reporting fewer orders, lower inventories, less employment, and weaker expectations. The only thing going up: prices.

Last Tuesday, the day before President Donald Trump's "Liberation Day" tariffs were set to be imposed, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt was asked by a reporter about the possibility of last-minute changes to those import taxes.
"The president was asked and answered this yesterday," Leavitt responded. "He is not considering an extension or a delay."
Less than 24 hours later, the White House announced that many of those tariffs would, in fact, be delayed. "This was [Trump's] strategy all along," Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent told reporters shortly after the change was announced.
That same cycle of events has played out several times in the past three months. Trump announced new tariffs on imports from Canada and Mexico in early February. Days after they were set to take effect, Trump postponed them. On April 11, the White House announced a sweeping set of tariff exemptions for televisions, phones, computer chips, and other electronics imported from China. By April 13, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said those tariff exemptions were temporary. Later the same day, Trump denied that any exemptions had been made at all. The president is now reportedly considering another delay, this one on the 25 percent tariff that he slapped on all imported cars and car parts.
What tariffs will America charge tomorrow, and what imports will be subject to them? It seems to depend on the whims of one man.
And that's not great for lots of other people who are trying to run businesses in the current environment.
Victor Owen Schwartz, the owner of VOS Selections, a New York–based importer and distributor of wines and spirits, says the new tariffs have made it "impossible" to plan ahead.
"Could you imagine if I had a supplier and every time I talk to them, they gave me a different price? This is the equivalent of that," Schwartz told Reason this week. (He is also a plaintiff in a new lawsuit challenging Trump's authority to impose these tariffs without congressional approval.)
That sentiment seems to be widespread—even in the industries that Trump's trade policies are supposed to be helping.
"The threats and uncertainty have made it hard to make business decisions," Traci Tapani, co-president of Wyoming Machine, a Minnesota-based sheet metal fabricator that relies on aluminum imports from Canada, tells Reason. Tapani, who also serves as vice chair for the U.S. Chamber of Commerce's small business council, says that she's already seen "immediate, detrimental" impacts from Trump's trade war, which "will make it extremely difficult for small businesses like mine to grow."
The New York Federal Reserve Bank's monthly survey of manufacturers, published earlier this week, reported sharp drops in what it calls "forward-looking indicators"—that is, what businesses expect the next six months to look like. The manufacturers in the survey expect to see fewer orders, longer delivery times, declining inventories, and lower levels of employment. About the only lines in the survey that are pointed upward are the expectations about prices.
Even global businesses don't seem to be immune. On Tuesday, the CEO of the Dutch firm ASML, the world's leading producer of the equipment needed to make semiconductors and other advanced computer chips, attributed lower-than-expected sales to America's new tariff regime, which he said is "creating a new uncertainty."
"The outlook for global trade has deteriorated sharply due to a surge in tariffs and trade policy uncertainty," the World Trade Organization said in the latest edition of its Global Trade Outlook report, released this week.
The biggest cost created by new tariffs is, of course, the actual cost of paying the tariffs—which are nothing more than a tax on imports. Still, the costs created by economic uncertainty are a major factor too, and those have become a bigger part of the current trade dynamic due to Trump's mercurial nature and his willingness to exercise unilateral control over tariffs.
During Trump's first term in office, the uncertainty created by his trade policies reduced aggregate U.S. investment by as much as $47 billion in 2018, according to a 2020 study in the Journal of Monetary Economics. The authors of that paper wrote that "all measures suggest that uncertainty about trade policy has recently shot up to levels not seen since the 1970s." They concluded that "both higher expected tariffs and increased uncertainty about future tariffs deters investment."
Those costs are almost certain to be higher this time because the size and scope of Trump's new trade war have greatly expanded, as has the uncertainty it created.
It is obviously difficult to objectively measure something as frothy and fleeting as uncertainty, but economists Scott Baker, Nick Bloom, and Steven Davis are the best at doing it. Their Economic Policy Uncertainty Index is based on newspaper reports, Congressional Budget Office reports, and surveys of economic forecasters by the Federal Reserve. Right now, the global index is at the highest level it has ever been—surpassing the previous peak set during the COVID-19 pandemic and far higher than it was during Trump's 2018 tariff phase.
The exact consequences of all that uncertainty remain to be seen, but the costs could show up in a variety of ways.
"Much research shows that increasing uncertainty can affect decision-making and thus economic activity through a number of economic channels," writes Kevin Kliesen, a business economist and research officer at the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis. "For example, firms may delay investment and hiring during periods of high uncertainty. Households may exercise precautionary reductions in spending by increasing their saving rates in anticipation of possible changes in incomes or wealth."
And the most immediate impact may be a loss of economic dynamism, which means slower supply chains and reduced risk-taking, as businesses wait to see what the next pronouncement from the White House (or the president's Truth Social account) will mean for their bottom lines.
"Our quotes are down. Our orders are down. Our purchase orders are down," Brian Bendig, president of Canada-based Cavalier Tool and Manufacturing, told the Windsor Star in February, as Trump targeted imports from Canada with higher tariffs. "People are scrambling and pivoting. The reality is almost nothing is moving."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
If it's stalling out economy, what were other countries' tariffs doing to theirs?
Those don’t count.
Whataboutism? You know that’s basically saying, “I have no valid argument, so I’ll just throw my poop at you.”, right?
You complain about my poop after you've smeared poop all over yourself - what advantage does that provide to you?
I never use whataboutism because it’s an admission of defeat. Literally any proactive argument, even a transparently false or stupid one, has more weight than whataboutism.
You’re the one saying “What about…”, not me.
Whataboutism is the standard defensive argument in these comments. You say "whatabout this you hypocrite" and then you win because you called the other person a hypocrite, which means they're wrong about everything.
Try to keep up.
"I always accuse 'whataboutism' to deflect attention away from my team's hypocrisy."
FIFY
Never let lesbians run your economy
Yes, crying whataboutism when someone points out the hypocrisy/inconsistency in your stance is admitting defeat.
Someone in roundup may be right about this being a sarc sock.
Dude, make up your mind. You clearly can’t deal with the fact that I am demonstrably different than each of the half-dozen or more people that you accuse me of being a sock for. Do you keep trying out a new one every time you realize your latest choice is clearly untrue?
My writing style and issue profile are both distinctive and has been the same since I joined a few years ago. My location and life experiences, as well as areas of knowledge, are distinct. My posts are consistent both internally as well as over time.
Just because I constantly expose the weaknesses to your arguments, that’s not a good reason to beclown yourself. Just take the L and move on.
These idiots don't argue with what you say. They argue with you. You as a person. They don't try to refute what you say. They refute you as a person. Their favorite way to do this is to accuse you of being a sock. One time Mother's Lament did this and accidentally proved I was being impersonated. What did he and Jesse and the rest do? They denied it and said I was running the socks. For years. They are the worst humanity has to offer.
Jesse and company are always arguing in bad faith. Don't fall into their traps. They're best completely ignored on mute.
Yeah. Definitively a sarc sock. Keeps defending his sock.
So you're saying you're a sarc sock?
You mean that thing that you Democrats say? History, and context?
Yeah, you fags absolutely hate all that.
No other country plays musical tariffs like Trump does.
Exactly.
You don't understand. Higher taxes are the road to prosperity. Ask any Trump defender if they want higher taxes and they'll say fuck yeah, right now, give it to me!
Besides, other countries have tariffs and previous presidents had tariffs, and you never complained about that you hypocrite. That means you need to shut the fuck up about Trump you raging leftist.
Poor sarc.
Sarcbot should be sent to the scrapyard and put through a crusher.
Pour Sarc.
Pour sarcbot.
"Higher taxes are the road to prosperity."
Ha! Any True Red-Blooded American KNOWS that tariffs aren't taxes!!! Now any more, they are tax CUTS!!! ('Cause team Donald SAID so!)
Try to keep up!!!
https://www.poynter.org/fact-checking/2025/are-tariffs-tax-cuts/
White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt says tariffs are ‘a tax cut.’ Economists say they aren’t
Carney Capitulates: Canada Waives Retaliatory Tariffs On US-Made Cars And Trucks
https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/carney-capitulates-canada-waives-retaliatory-tariffs-us-made-cars-and-trucks
Oh yeah? Well, penguins.
Damn those birds. Foiled again.
I’m confused. Is it your contention that Canada dropping additional tariffs that never would have existed without Trump’s tariffs is a win? Getting back to where you started is success?
Did Canada ever have tariffs in your world? What were they?
Yes, they did. It’s in the treaty that Trump negotiated in his first term: https://www.newsweek.com/canada-us-retaliatory-tariffs-donald-trump-2024-comparison-2043678
“Canada maintained tariffs on U.S. imports last year, largely adhering to the framework established under the U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA).”
This term’s Trump says that term’s Trump was a terrible negotiator and made bad deals.
I’m not sure what point you were trying to make, since Canadian tariffs aren’t something we can impact without a trade agreement. Like most of your arguments, whatever this one was, it was an abject failure.
JesseBahnFarter-Fuhrer is an abject failure, actually, factually...
Cool story fag.
Sore-in-the-cunt cuntsorevaturds are SUCH dreamy, sophisticated, fact-filled brainiacs!
EDUCATE us all, Ye PervFectly Omniscient Egghead!!
(Butt shit would be nice to have a cited web link or a book or some such, to read, Oh Great Eggheaded Wonder Child!
Even an icky-poo or faggotty cite could possibly sometimes help!)
Largely adhering is doing a lot of heavy lifting there buddy.
Even trumps recent tariff increases largely adhered to the new trade agreements, see his statements on what is exempted. Lol.
Do you ever think before posting?
Sorry this is happening to you sarc sock.
I thought I was Mike. Or Jeff. Or … shit, the list is too long to waste time on.
>>And the most immediate impact may be
fuck your immediate impact.
I was here for "supply chain issues" your cries of "stalling the economy" do not concern me.
I love that clip.
I loved it when you supported the Iraq War!
I loved it when you weren't here, shit-for-brains. Fuck off and die.
you should think to be sensitive to those who lost loved ones when our government lied us into that
Our quotes are down. Our orders are down. Our purchase orders are down," Brian Bendig, president of Canada-based Cavalier Tool and Manufacturing,
Wasn’t that the whole idea?
No.
Article I, Section 8, Clause 1:
The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises,
Trump's defenders have made it clear that he's issuing executive orders to stop the enforcement of unconstitutional laws. That means that he'd never take advantage of an unconstitutional law and make it the centerpiece of his administration's power. Because the narrative is never wrong, the Constitution must be lying. It's the only explanation.
He actually cites the laws he is utilizing in every EO dumdum.
No, he cites his interpretation of various laws in his EOs. Frequently that is at odds with reality and legal precedent, but he doesn’t let pesky things like reality stop him.
The dumdum is the one who thinks what Trump says is always true. Or even frequently true. Or mostly true.
That’s you.
In other words, he correctly interprets the laws, but it doesn’t match up with a Democrat narrative. So you are ordered to believe that it must be wrong.
Is your intention to be a retarded piece of shit your entire life?
So he cites the laws. Thanks for being retarded.
Good luck putting that genie back in the bottle.
I bet Paul’s bill doesn’t get more than 50% support from Congressional Democrats (let alone Republicans).
Moreover, I'm pretty sure I'm being generous if I assume he can cite where he was quoting Article I, Section 8, Clause 1 to people about Kyoto or Paris or the TPP or NAFTA or the renegotiation of NAFTA or Iranian Sanctions or Russian Sanctions or Ukrainian Aid... rather than *all of a sudden* discovering Article I, Section 8, Clause 1 in 2025.
Oh thank god, I was afraid there’d be no tariff articles today.
Shits like Boehm with raging cases of TDS aren't stalling the constant stream of bullshit.
Fuck off and die, asshole.
"Could you imagine if I had a supplier and every time I talk to them, they gave me a different price?”
You mean like going to the pharmacy to pick up and pay for a prescription?
ALSO caused by government intervention.
ChatGPT is like, "I'm sorry Mr. Boehm, as advanced as I am, I can only write the same article in a different way so many times."
So how much is Domestic Taxes and Regulation "stalling the economy"?
What if there was ZERO-Tax and Regulation on Domestic Trade?
"Could you imagine if I had a supplier and every time I talk to them, they gave me a different price? This is the equivalent of that," Schwartz told Reason this week.
Fucking LOL! Markets would be so much more efficient if prices were just fixed so importer/exporters could profit!
Has Schwartz never bought gasoline or coffee or eggs or wheat or soy or pork or beef or electricity or N95 masks or crypto or toilet paper... like... ever?
Gosh thanks Einstein. This is how it works Eric, short term pain for long term gain. Stop acting like a child.
While making plans for the perfect president to materialise [sic] some day, we can appreciate his demonstrated ability to use tariffs suspensefully.