Postnatal Drug Tests Turn Mothers Into Felons
A Mississippi mom was charged with a felony years after she gave birth for drug use early in her pregnancy.

Five years after giving birth to a baby girl in 2019, Mississippi mother Brandy Moore was arrested for "aggravated domestic violence" based on a postnatal drug test. The timing was puzzling, and so was the legal reasoning of the prosecutor who accused Moore of that felony, which is punishable by up to 20 years in prison.
Postnatal drug tests, even when they are erroneous, can trigger grueling investigations by state-appointed social workers, which can lead to separation of mothers from their newborn children and criminal charges. But Moore's case was unusual because, for reasons that were unclear, she was not arrested for her alleged prenatal crime until her daughter, Remi, was in preschool. It was also unusual because the prosecutor dropped the charge after reconsidering his strategy of trying to "help" mothers by threatening them with prison.
Moore used methamphetamine early in her pregnancy but stopped after a religious epiphany inspired her to keep the baby and turn her life around. She attracted scrutiny at the hospital where she gave birth because her urine tested positive for marijuana and opioids. She said she smoked marijuana near the end of her pregnancy to relieve nausea. She also took prescribed opioids for pain relief the night before Remi was born. But the urinalysis results led to a drug test of Remi's first bowel movement, which detected traces of amphetamines, consistent with Moore's account that she stopped using meth midway through her pregnancy.
Based on the latter test result, District Attorney Steven Kilgore obtained the indictment that led to Moore's arrest last May. But her conduct plainly did not fit the elements of aggravated domestic violence, a charge that is justified only when someone "attempts to cause serious bodily injury to another, or causes such an injury purposely, knowingly or recklessly under circumstances manifesting extreme indifference to the value of human life."
As Kilgore saw it, that did not matter, since the women he charged typically pleaded guilty. "Ultimately the goal wasn't to get a conviction upheld after a trial, which would be the goal in a murder case or something like that," he told Mississippi Today reporter Anna Wolfe. "It was to get help for this mother."
Kilgore was shocked when Wolfe revealed the harm caused by his use of this charge, including prison sentences as long as 20 years for women who failed to meet the arduous demands of his district's drug court program. "I've reevaluated our stance on the topic and have decided not to handle these cases anymore," he told Wolfe. "It was eye-opening to learn of the fate of these women. I believe we all can do better."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
JS;dr
VD;dr. VD (Venereal Disease) is some BAD shit! Go see the Dr. if you've got the VD!!! THAT is why I say VD;dr.!!!
(Some forms of VD also cause bona fide mental illness… THINK about shit!)
It seems you of all people would be critical of women doing drugs while pregnant.
I, unlike SOME people around here, do SNOT think that "punishment fixes everything"... Snot even punishment from Government Almighty! Addiction to punishing others is THE WORST form of addiction that exists!
Until I read the by line I thought this was a dig at ENB for being as unhinged and irrelevant and one note as Jacob Sullum.
JS;dr
HOw old is this post, not new info
So she used meth, opioids, and marijuana while pregnant. Cool story Sullum.
She didn't get an abortion, and she turned her life around... Punishment addicts think that she should be PUNISHED for that! Get an abortion, get punished! DON'T get an abortion, get punished!
HOW MUCH punishment do You PervFectly EVIL people want to dish out? You suffer from an unquenchable thirst, which is a synonym for EVIL! Give shit up already! Does Your PervFect unquenchable thirst make you HAPPY? Then give it up already!
I have to agree. While the charges seem excessive, that is a question of degree, not kind. And blaming the drug test for the charges is absurd. By her own admission, she used at least three categories of illegal substances during her pregnancy. The fact that she is a young mother shouldn't be used as a get-out-of-jail free. In fact, it should make us more concerned about her activities.
You have no credibility here.
Man tricks pregnant girlfriend into taking abortion pill
CNN
https://www.cnn.com › 2013/09/10 › justice › girlfrien...
Sep 10, 2013 — This week, Welden, 28, pleaded guilty to killing their unborn baby. How? He tricked Lee into taking an abortion pill, causing her to miscarry.
Man accused of killing fetus with "abortion pancake"
CBS News
https://www.cbsnews.com › Crime
Jul 14, 2014 — - A northwest Kansas man will stand trial on charges of first-degree murder and aggravated battery after prosecutors say he killed his ...
Man allegedly slips girlfriend abortion drug
NBC News
https://www.nbcnews.com › wbna22032450
Nov 29, 2007 — Manishkumar M. Patel, 34, of Appleton, was charged with seven felonies and two misdemeanors, including attempted first-degree murder of an ...
Man who spiked orange juice to force miscarriage convicted
Crown Prosecution Service (CPS)
https://www.cps.gov.uk › east-england › news › man-w...
Oct 30, 2024 — He then inserted a number of tablets of misoprostol, another ... Rape counts, linked to murder, left to lie on file. Sexual offences ...
Boyfriend charged with homicide for secret abortion pill ...
Catholic News Agency
https://www.catholicnewsagency.com › news › boyfrien...
Dec 4, 2007 — A Wisconsin man who caused two miscarriages by slipping abortion pills to his girlfriend has been charged with first-degree homicide.
Missing: mifepristone | Show results with: mifepristone
Massachusetts man accused of secretly giving girlfriend ...
CBS News
Dude should have just claimed he identified as a woman and this was as close as he'd ever get to having his very own abortion. Watch the narrative spin.
Check your links.
Ass long ass Ye PervFectly Follow The Right Tribal FEELZ, twat does shit matter of Yer links work (to support yer PervFected Points), or snot?
*But her conduct plainly did not fit the elements of aggravated domestic violence, a charge that is justified only when someone "attempts to cause serious bodily injury to another, or causes such an injury purposely, knowingly or recklessly under circumstances manifesting extreme indifference to the value of human life."*
Uh, extreme indifference to human life like taking meth for the first half of your pregnancy? It's good that she cleaned up her life and stopped doing serious damage to her baby half way in, but that doesn't magically wipe away the sin. Are you not responsible for the banks you did rob because you realized it was wrong and decided to stop doing it a few months in?
Okay, well-stated sensible comments are so rare on here that I must congratulate yours.
I don't know if it was your intent but you do underline the stupid indifference to real suffering that REASON routinely displays.
But they can never say anything moral, civic, or common-sensical about drugs. Poor deluded fools living in gated communities.
Thank you. I try to view things through a logical lense, though I certainly have my own biases I have to fight. And yes, Reason's determination to find a silver lining in every meth cloud drives me up the wall as well.
You can have held a sincere belief that something was a good idea, say invading Afghanistan after 9/11, and later change your mind when the facts roll in. The proper response is to do little soul searching, learn some humility, and say, as I have, "Boy, that was stupid fucking idea I had. I should really change my thinking going forward."
Your turn, Reason. How's the increased legalization and availability of drugs working out? Any negative side effects at all?
Or using the magical Marijuana which has no adverse side effects, ever.
I don't think anyone's ever said that marijuana "has no adverse side effects, ever", just that it has fewer adverse side effects than lots and lots of other things that are completely legal and utterly unregulated.
I will also note that in this particular context, breaking up a family so you can arrest the mother for marijuana use during pregnancy is going to be far more damaging to the kid than the actual marijuana was.
Is the kid going to be better off with his mother in prison, or not?
So the latter part of the charge is "...or recklessly under circumstances manifesting extreme indifference to human life."
Could you offer some logic as to why that does not fit rather than assuming it is obvious?
" . . . under circumstances manifesting extreme indifference to human life."
Sounds like she had an abortion instead of a baby.
With a few extreme exceptions, maternal substance abuse does not actually harm most fetuses. If they were as fragile as you are trying to claim, nobody would ever successfully carry to term.
Consider an analogy. How fast do you have to be speeding to be considered "manifesting extreme indifference to human life"? A hundred miles over the speed limit? Fifty? Ten? One? I don't know the answer but I know that one and even ten is clearly wrong. "Extreme indifference" is a very high standard. Recreational drug use is almost never going to reach it.
"Moore used methamphetamine early in her pregnancy but stopped after a religious epiphany inspired her to keep the baby and turn her life around."
Root cause analysis:
She took drugs because she was going to kill the baby anyway.
It is those evil Christians that made her actually have the child and eventually get tested for drugs, and obviously get charged years later.
And it is somehow also Trump's fault.
(Because she turned her life around, she probably now votes republican instead of democrat)
It's ok to murder your womb neighbor, but it isn't ok to do some drugs with them?
Oh so NOW people want to talk about the concept of negligence. Funny how this topic only seems to pop up when it's about fetuses and children.
If you want to try to argue that the mother here was negligent towards her child when she was taking meth for the first part of her pregnancy, then fine, let's have that argument. But ONLY if you are willing to apply that same concept of negligence *in general*, not just to pregnant women.
What about, say, a person who has a contagious disease, knows he has a contagious disease, and decides to go out in public anyway knowing that he could very well transmit that disease to other people? Is that person negligent?
What about, say, a person who doesn't know if he has a contagious disease, refuses to get vaccinated for that disease, and decides to go out in public, knowing that he might become a carrier for that disease by refusing to become vaccinated? Is that person negligent?
BEARS IN TRUNKS!
You're still wearing the mask, aren't you.
"What about, say, a person who has a contagious disease, knows he has a contagious disease, and decides to go out in public anyway knowing that he could very well transmit that disease to other people? Is that person negligent?"
No.
Next question?
I know you STILL love the lockdowns et al...but they did not work.
So why is it negligence if a pregnant mom uses meth for part of her pregnancy, but not negligence if a person with a contagious disease passes it on in public?
Depends on the situation. We already have laws about knowingly transmitting AIDS or other venereal diseases.
The problem with normal airborne diseases is that you have issues of knowledge, necessity, and severity to deal with. If you think it's a cold and its actually the flu, then is that really negligent?
And your idea about punishing people for getting infected if they aren't vaccinated is a huge violation of bodily autonomy.
The problems of mothers tsking drugs impacting their children is a well-documented field of study and there is a direct correlation.
Your loved lockdowns and mask mandates are ALSO widely known to not work.
Otherwise, same thing.
Listen up, Nazi, just because you're tubby and unlovable does not mean you are actually wise.
If you are HIV positive and jackoff on a woman it is ok as long as you feel bad after. - jeffy
Gosh, an attorney who doesn't give a rat's @$$ about the harm he does.
Who would have thought.
but stopped after a religious epiphany inspired her to keep the baby and turn her life around.
That's what we should be arresting her for.
No rational person would just suddenly decide to stop poisoning themselves and others to death.
Mom does a smorgasbord of drugs while pregnant, but she's the real victim here.
Riiiight.
Extermination of a fetus is fine.
Getting high with one is not fine.
Got it.
I'm not sure which side you're arguing with, but I doubt you would find many people who believe in limits on abortion who don't also think drugging your child is criminal. The side that thinks it's totally a human with full constitutional rights unless the mother wants to kill it 10 months in has a tougher road to consistency.