'We Are Not Stopping'
Plus: Texas midwife arrested for violating abortion ban, JFK files, Gaza bombings, astronauts finally rescued, and more...

In court and the media, the Trump administration spent Monday asserting its power to deport asylum seekers without due process—and to ignore judges who get in the way.
"We are not stopping," Tom Homan, the administration's border czar, told Fox News on Monday. "I don't care what the judges think."
A similar message was reportedly delivered in a less direct way at the federal courthouse in Washington, where Trump administration lawyers refused to give direct answers to Judge James Boasberg's questions about the deportation of over 200 Venezuelans over the weekend. Boasberg was trying to figure out the timeline of those deportation flights—some of which seem to have departed after he issued an order on Saturday halting them—but Justice Department attorneys said they could not disclose more information due to "national security" reasons, The New York Times reports.
You are reading Reason Roundup, our daily, morning newsletter.
Get your daily news roundup from Liz Wolfe and Reason.
Of course, the White House's social media team had no such concerns as it gleefully bragged about sending dozens of people to a Central American prison without any proof of their guilt.
Trust the process. The bigger issue—one that was not part of Monday evening's hearing—is whether Trump has the authority to deport anyone under the Alien Enemies Act, a 1798 law that allows deportations to occur without due process. Trump invoked the law on Saturday when he declared that members of Tren de Aragua, a Venezuelan drug gang, had "unlawfully infiltrated the United States and are conducting irregular warfare" against Americans.
The White House says most of the migrants deported over the weekend were believed to be Tren de Aragua members (while others were part of MS-13, a different gang). However, immigration attorneys have pointed out that the administration has not released detailed information about the individuals or explained why they were chosen for deportation.
This is why due process matters. There's a key difference between "suspected of being in a drug gang" and "yep, we know that guy is a member of a drug gang." Eroding that distinction has all sorts of bad implications for freedom.
A troubling pattern. The Trump administration's determination to ignore due process for would-be deportees would be worrying even if it were happening in a vacuum. However, that's not the case. From the relatively low-stakes willingness of the Department of Government Efficiency to move fast and not wait for permission, to the Trump administration's attempt to punish law firms for working with the administration's opponents, and its ongoing attempt to undermine birthright citizenship, the White House is showing little regard for limits on executive authority.
On several different issues, the Trump administration's "actions reflect an unorthodox conception of American government in which the president pushes his powers to the outer limits, with diminished regard for the checks and balances provided by the legislative and judicial branches," is how The Wall Street Journal summarized things on Monday.
What's it all mean? It may be too soon to call this a full-blown constitutional crisis—though, as a general rule, presidents should not behave as if judicial rulings are optional. We're in roughly the same territory as when Joe Biden blew off the Supreme Court and did student loan forgiveness anyway—except with higher stakes since there are human lives and not just taxpayer dollars hanging in the balance.
Here's what seems more certain: Due process (yes, even for suspected drug gang members) is not something that ought to be swept aside in the name of efficiency or "fighting law and order," as White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt accidentally phrased it on Monday. Indeed, the value of due process and other checks on executive power is that they are inefficient. That's why the system requires that the government proves its case beyond a reasonable doubt.
Trump is not clearing that bar right now, and the White House's unserious approach to these important issues suggests a worse crisis could be coming.
There are three simple reasons the Trump administration is targeting so many legal immigrants for deportation (in order):
1. It's easy to find and deport them,
2. There aren't that many illegal immigrant criminals, and
3. The administration doesn't like legal immigration.— The Alex Nowrasteh (@AlexNowrasteh) March 17, 2025
Scenes from Washington, D.C.: Get your popcorn ready: Another 80,000 pages of unredacted files about the assassination of President John F. Kennedy are supposed to be released on Tuesday. It's all probably another nothingburger, but one positive sign is that the release is being handled by the National Archives rather than a bunch of right-wing influencers.
Just talked to @USNatArchives.
All JFK files being released tomorrow will be housed at the below link. ⬇️https://t.co/dVS0KZLecM ????— Anna Paulina Luna (@realannapaulina) March 18, 2025
QUICK HITS
- A midwife was arrested in Texas and charged with illegally performing abortions in violation of the state's ban. Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton said Maria Margarita Rojas was charged with a second-degree felony.
- Israel shattered a ceasefire deal with a large bombing campaign in Gaza. The attack reportedly killed over 400 people.
- Two astronauts stranded at the International Space Station for nine months are on their way back to Earth this morning.
- "Donald Trump's allies have pivoted from denying that his tariffs will hurt consumers to insisting that consumers should welcome the pain," writes Scott Lincicome in The Atlantic.
- Semisonic, the '90s alt-rock trio best known for "Closing Time," was unwillingly drawn into Monday's immigration drama when the White House used that song in a disgraceful video celebrating deportations. Their second album was one of the first CDs I owned as a kid, so please enjoy this underappreciated bop as a palate cleanser:
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
In court and the media, the Trump administration spent Monday asserting its power to deport asylum seekers without due process—and to ignore judges who get in the way.
Coequal branches means judges get the final say.
*unelected judges* just like that Nazi Musk!
As it turns out, Musk is not a judge.
He, like other federal employees, was hired.
Deal with it.
Poe's Law has pinioned me. I truly can not tell if this is sarcasm or not.
It is.
Especially corrupt judge shopped ones with a long history of political judgements.
...and who made it a point to attend Trump's criminal trial in NY.
You know who else ignored judges?
G Gordon Liddy?
Armand Assante?
Jose Altuve fans?
Kanye West?
Ma-ma Madrigal?
Now that's a movie that deserved a sequel.
The Canaanites?
Let's agree to disagree!
Who wins if we agree to disagree?
The judges.
LAWFARE: The Obama judge blocking Trump's deportation of illegal criminal gang members has a daughter who's NGO provides legal services to illegals including TdA & MS-13 members and is funded by government grants (indirectly via USAID).
https://x.com/amuse/status/1902002183161225593
Definite conflict of interest.
The 4th, 5th, 6th, 7th, and 8th amendment mean that judges - in the judicial branch - get the final say.
False.
Nowhere in the Constitution does it say the branches are co-equal. Congress has more power than the president.
Yes, the Legislative is the final say. But fortunately or unfortunately (depending on what the country needs from them at any given time) those dipshits seldom agree on anything unless there's a powerful lobby at work.
Based on what? Article 1 being before article 2? Then that makes Article 3 the weakest it seems.
Oh wait. You think congress can coopt any other power they desire, even if explicit in the other articles.
Where do you come up with this shit?
Trump invoked the law on Saturday when he declared that members of Tren de Aragua, a Venezuelan drug gang, had "unlawfully infiltrated the United States and are conducting irregular warfare" against Americans.
Does this mean that Colorado apartment building is up for grabs?
It was only a handful of apartment buildings. Whats the big deal?
Look, some people did something…
Irregular warfare is usually settled via a local municipal court eviction action. It's not quite the Hague. But it will settle this problem.
All of this normal. Nothing to see here. NOBODY QUESTION THE EXECUTIVE ORDER OR ALL HELL IS GOING TO BREAK LOOSE!!
Lol, I suppose we should have been more open to the idea you’re a parody.
Are you having a stroke?
You're not an attorney. You have no legal understanding.
Once again you've been given actual citations of regulations, the law directed, and even a USSC case below stating you're wrong.
On top of that you'd know a judges written order gets submitted for application and DHS followed the order when it was received, but not sooner.
Trump seized it as proceeds of gang crime. He's developing it as the Atlantic City of the West.
+1 Trump Steaks
However, immigration attorneys have pointed out that the administration has not released detailed information about the individuals or explained why they were chosen for deportation.
Like a San Franciscan at a Walgreens, Trump is just walking out with whatever he wants.
Any flight with less than 1000 immigrants is not a problem.
The Trump administration's determination to ignore due process for would-be deportees would be worrying even if it were happening in a vacuum.
I blame the previous administrations' (Trump's included?) inability to act or outright ignorance of the problem for this current possible slide into authoritarianism. You let a situation get out of hand and guess the fuck what.
Except that they aren't actually avoiding due process. Lawyers, activists and writers like BoehmGTP have learned that you don't have to make verifiable or even true accusations. What matters is that you make them.
I wish I found it odd that a reason writer here sounds exactly like Molly, but I don't.
"If there be time to expose through discussion the falsehood and fallacies, to avert the evil by the processes of education, the remedy to be applied is more speech, not enforced silence." - Louis Brandeis
"If you generate enough retarded bullshit and pile it high enough there won't be enough time to expose the falsehood and fallacies through discussion." - "Free Speech Purist" GPT
We should define what due process is in these cases..
First off a claim of asylum goes before an immigration judge who is appointed by the Attorney General and is not a part of the judicial branch. Remember that is only if they seek an asylum claim.
If they don't seek an asylum claim it becomes a simple case of here legally or not and if not are immediately deportable regardless of possessing a criminal record.
In this case the only question would seem to be their criminal records which considering that Homan and Trump said the first targeted would be those with criminal records the odds would suggest all of those deported possessed criminal convictions in a court of law( with all due process).
To me it seems like these deported have received full legal due process. Perhaps their defenders can tell me where the deportees have failed to receive due process?
Trump claims authority under the Alien Enemies Act and if he does indeed have that power due process is satisfied in this case. Eric starts the article by claiming that these people have been absolutely, positively denied due process then admits a paragraph later that the matter has not been adjudicated. I've seen lawyerly arguments on both sides but until the Supreme Court makes a decision it will remain unresolved and the district court judge in this case, who has a long history of anti Trump animus, has not even attempted to rule on the merits. Meanwhile he is unilaterally obstructing the executive. Does it become a constitutional crisis only when the executive defies a district court? Is it also a constitutional crisis when a politicized court defies the executive? Are the branches coequal?
Someone who enters the US and is claiming asylum may not get a court hearing to adjudicate the claim for months or years. They could be temporarily paroled into the US awaiting the adjudication of their asylum claim. Because they are paroled; the govt should know an address to send notices of future court dates. Some have to check in regularly with a local office. I.e, there are conditions on their release.
It is probable that not ALL people seeking asylum will be granted it after a hearing. It is also 100% probable that all people in the above category who are instead simply sent to El Salvador will not ever make their future asylum court date. It is also possible if not probable that some people who are on parole status with a valid asylum claim were lawfully present in the US when Trump entered his executive order invoking the Alien Enemies Act. With no need for verification of whether they are actually members of TdA; you can't say due process has been satisfied. The executive order applies to a specific subset of Venezuelan immigrants that belong to a specific gang/terrorist organization. An immigrant who is merely male and Venezuelan may or may not be subject to the order. And I for one am not in the habit of accepting Pam Bondi or Tom Homan's word that they did any proper vetting to distinguish those subject to the executive order and those not subject to it. Nobody should find that acceptable when they go on t.v. and bloviate endlessly about 'terrorists' and 'thugs' and 'rapists' in an effort to propagandize the public into not objecting to their obvious abuse of authority. So F them. They deserve no benefit of any doubt.
I think you should call 911, it's pretty obvious you're suffering a massive CVA right now.
He's been suffering so many strokes that he thinks he is not only a Chicago lawyer, but a competent one at that.
Were any of deported on these flights asylum seekers? If no the fact that they were in the USA illegally is enough to deport them.
As to their detainment in El Salvador these are convicted criminals and these are people whose home nation isn't allowing them to return.
We know that they are convicted criminals because those are the main targets of deportations at this point and because the court filings make that claim. If their home country Venezuela would take them imprisonment in a neutral nation wouldn't be necessary.
Even without using the Alien Enemy Act I would say that they have received full due process as all that the AEA really did was speed up the process. They were deportable in any event as they weren't likely asylum seekers and all were almost certainly felons. They weren't going to be allowed to stay. The only real question was how quickly they could be deported.
YOU DONT FUCKING KNOW any of the underlying facts. Which is the point as to why summary deportation to El Salvadoran prison is a legal problem and potentially a major due process problem. The Judge in D.C. is trying to find out those facts and the administration is doing their best to stonewall him with dramatic references to secret foreign policy. Despite the fact that they are televising arrivals and showing them getting their heads shaven. Either something is secret is not. The govt doesn't get to have it both ways.
Of course, the White House's social media team had no such concerns...
They posted flight times and routes, or are you being a duplicitous arsehole.
It’s Eric Boehm. Of course he’s being a duplicitous asshole.
That's why the system requires that the government proves its case beyond a reasonable doubt.
“We need some more hills to stupidly die on, someone get Boehm on Teams already” - KMW
Definitely duplicitous arsehole.
Boehm is from the Lying Jeffy school of journalism. It doesn't matter what actually happened, it's how you feel about it. That's YOUR truth.
It may be too soon to call this a full-blown constitutional crisis—though, as a general rule, presidents should not behave as if judicial rulings are optional.
Apparently only one side has the luxury of considering the other side's authority optional. This actually is a constitutional crisis, but who triggered it is not obvious.
The sarc flag!
Also a Lying Jeffy flag. He refuses to address judges restraining the president from doing things that are clearly within his authority.
The real elected president are the lower court judges.
Saw some numbers. In his first term there were more TROs issued against Trump than all other president's combined. The judges are set tonshatter that record by end of the year.
"suspected of being in a drug gang" and "yep, we know that guy is a member of a drug gang."
I remember that antifa doesn't have membership cards, so no one can be a "member" of antifa. I suspect gangs also do not issue membership cards.
The "No True Gang Member" fallacy?
Because randos not involved with the gang would get the face tattoos of them.
Some people do...it turns out to be VERY MUCH NOT RECOMMENDED as the real gang does not look on this too kindly.
It was the fashion at the time.
According to Wikipedia, Tren de Araguas does NOT have any official tattoos, etc., because they do not want to provide police with proof of membership.
In another article, a deported Venezuelan's lawyer claims that her legaly-present client was deported solely because of a tattoo with a crown and a soccer ball, which the immigration agent saw as a gang tattoo. But the crown is from the logo of the Real Madrid (Royal Madrid) soccer team; it only shows he's a fan of a Spanish soccer team. He could _also_ be a gang member, but no evidence of that was posted, and he was stuffed into an airplane a few weeks before a scheduled hearing where he could have contested the designation as a gang member.
I see Boehm is fully on team terrorist and gang banger. Just ignore Hamas's role in breaking the ceasefire and the actual crimes and victims of the "asylum seekers" from a murderous gang to make his leftist points. He nay as well praise Dahmer for his love of children with his laughably demented excuses for evil.
Bohem should invite them to live with him. And after they kill him we will all be better off. Ditto for the judge
Sure, make me side with the violent criminals.
You beat me to it. Boehm the birdbrain just ignores the many ceasefire violations of hamas. Why is that?
Does Boehm deliberately ignore hamas' actions; gleefully dancing and cheering dead babies. Returning random dead bodies. Torture and starvation of the hostages.
The question is why Boehm ignores it. Is he just a POS antisemite who deosn't mind seeing Jews murdered and totured, or just is he just dumb AF?
Embrace the power of "and"
https://babylonbee.com/news/judge-orders-astronauts-be-returned-to-space-station
Yeah, that writer blew it. Should have been written after the capsule had started its deorbit burn but before landing.
Lol.
That is great.
This is why due process matters.
I agree. However, the fact remains that citizens have rights that guests do not. That's what makes a country. People need to make the informed choice to come here as guests knowing that they can be asked to leave at any moment. On a human level I don't entirely like its sometimes arbitrary nature but I understand it. The real concern is how long until the feds turn their whims on Americans.
The unstated problem is that "due process" is a legal term which has been abused to a ritualistic quibble by lawyers who don't give a shit.
All those criminals got due process when they crossed the border. Didn't stop them from entering even with their criminal background. Didn't detain them for ICE when they committed new crimes and got released on own recognizance. Suddenly it matters when it's the wrong due process getting rid of criminals who aren't getting a second third tenth chance.
Yeah due process has become like fascist. Nobody knows what it means anymore.
^this (for fist)
until the feds turn their whims on Americans.
This, give them an inch and next you thing you know SWAT teams will be breaking down doors and setting off flash grenades just to get the maid and stick the homeowner with the bill for all the destruction.
If we deport illegal alien criminals we lose all our rights as citizens is a take i guess.
Do we not allow SWAT to storm houses, and not reimburse the homeowner for damages?
That has to do with deportation how?
It has to do with the tendency of law enforcement to push for more draconian, less protections so they can solve the problem at hand.
But hey if you haven't done anything wrong you got nothing to worry about. Just ask those parents who were targeted as domestic terrorists because they complained loudly at school board hearings. What does petitioning your government have to do with terrorism; I don't know but law enforcement knows.
You used something already happening as a potential future problem for something else. It’s a poor argument.
So law enforcement doesn't have a tendency to push for more draconian policies at the expense of our protections?
You used something already happening as a potential future problem for something else. It’s a poor argument.
You keep using the word more. Where is the more in regards to deportation of criminal aliens? They are following the actual laws. Instead of ignoring them like Biden.
But maybe you enjoy the costs associated from the problem of illegal immigration?
California just moved another 3B into MediCal for illegals. Good thing right?
So nothing to do with deportation or following the actual current statutory construction of deportation. Got it. Just flailing.
Like border patrol being able conduct ops on private property without a warrant if 25 miles from the border?
Or their insisting you give your password to your devices to reenter the country without a warrant?
How about the unlawful deportation of American citizens? Like Mark Lyttle.
Or the case of Gerardo Serrano having his truck seized at the border and held for 2 years until the IJ filed suit? No charges ever filed against him.
How about CBP seizure of cash at intercontinental airports without filing charges? Like the case of the nurse heading to Africa to setup a clinic.
A bunch more flailing having nothing to do with the present deportation case.
But maybe 10 more responses and you'll make a valid point.
Seems I answered your og complaint and showed how border enforcement can lead to the rights of Americans being infringed. I never stated anything about the specific case other than you give an inch and they take more.
Why are you so upset that I provided you with concrete examples of that having happened after you asked for some?
No. You didn't. That's the sad part. As the two issues are completely separate. The USSC has always stated crossing the border grants extra search rights for the government. This has nothing to do with deportation regulation or law.
So do you want to try again? Or keep at the idiocy?
The funny thing is, way back when, this all started with citizens at internal border checkpoints 100 mi. away from the border.
A lot like the gay marriage debate, where it's not entirely clear whether it is/was just a long con specifically to destroy the fundamentals of democracy and social good will/faith, an abject and irrepressible desire to be absolutely batshit insane, or both.
Whoopie Goldberg says she might be next.
If only.
I hope Ireland has Ozempic
Ireland? With her last name, I figured she would flee to Israel.
Everyone has the same due process rights.
Ok, but these guys already had due process.
If accused of a crime, yes. But not in regards to immigration. Godzilla you're a fucking imbecile.
Man, when even FoE is so pissed off at the post that he's making sharp, directed points rather than gently mocking it... Reason has probably posted a serious shitburger of an article.
The administration doesn't like legal immigration.
Elect a protectionist president you get a protectionist president. The Dems are secretly kicking themselves for not staying that course.
The Venezuelan gangsters were legal immigrants?
They were flown into the country by the Biden administration, and therefore it was legal. That’s how this works.
The Dems are secretly kicking themselves for not staying that course.
The fact that they plugged in the amp that goes to 11 having yet to dawn on many of them.
I think the leadership might be starting to see that this new path that whichever overlords laid out for them is not helping with the working class.
And most people, outside of their wine-box mom, college faculty lounge, purple-haired barista coven.
They allowed the far left to gain power for the purpose of getting Trump, now they’ve lost control of them.
I don't think they've lost control. You're not going to get to UBI, social credit scores and permanent marshal law without a societal breakdown, and 2030 is only five years away.
I think people like Schumer and Pelosi would prefer the graft continue as it has been.
The whole thing, UBI, social credit scores, and owning nothing is all part of the graft. They want us not just subservient to them, but always be in hock to them like the old company stores found in remote mining towns.
Between the various transgender, open borders, lawfare, and COVID, and censorship, I remain unconvinced that there's a meaningful distinction between "They" and "the far left".
Sure, the little area in the middle of the daisy that is the Venn Diagram of these issues is only 1 or 5% of the electorate, but the flower and all the overlapping petals, each of which is pretty fucking far left, are like 45+% of the electorate.
And I am more disturbed by the millions of rank-and-file Democrats who will go along with whatever insanity the fringes demand, from COVID lock-downs to gender delusions.
Quick poll who here trusts anything bohem writes?
I trust it to be full of calumny and false equivalencies. With some *trust the experts* sprinkled in.
Like Rupar.
I trust Boehm to make Pluggo look slightly more honest. I trust him to have enough strawmen in his article to make Sarc jealous. I trust him to have enough false equivalencies to make Jeffy fully erect. I trust him to misconstrue everything.
I trust the opposite.
Haha, good one.
Boehm the birdbrain just produces boehm droppings.
Is "trust" the same as nauseated anger?
" punish law firms for working with the administration's opponents,
"the White House is showing little regard for limits on executive authority.
We'll have to wait for all these things to reach SCOTUS, but for most of the actions, the President's actions are well-founded in statutory language and existing policy. The ability of the President to grant or deny security clearances is pretty absolute, so denying them to "enemies" is well within his rights, even if we might disagree with his reasons.
I feel pretty certain that SCOTUS will end up with some of these challenges along the lines of "You say the President can't do X, but we find that the statutory language, in fact, provides the Congressionally-approved authority to exactly do X. Next case." The fact that district and appellate courts can read the law that says "When the President determines xxx, he may do yyy..." and say that "the President may not do yyy when he determines xxx because we don't like him" confounds me.
Remember bohem was all good with disbaring the lawyers that defended trump.
He was also good with charging them with RICO for giving legal advice and acting on behalf of their clients.
Regretfully and strategically.
In fact, Trump bows to final court decisions more than Biden did, famously saying the Supreme Court has ruled against him and he did it anyway.
Was that Joe himself or the auto-pen speaking?
Perkins Coie was involved in the Steele dossier. They should suffer worse consequences than having their security clearances revoked.
Wonder why Boehm didn’t mention that?
Yeah, funny that. I can't imagine why.
Is there enough evidence for a warrant?
...one positive sign is that the release is being handled by the National Archives rather than a bunch of right-wing influencers.
TRUST OUR CHERISHED INSTITUTIONS TO DO THE RIGHT THING.
You know who else used an archival institution to his own benefit?
(The OG reply is about the JFK assassination, if that helps sell the joke.)
Is this a reference to the Book Suppository Building?
Now you've gone too far selling the joke.
Too soon?
Henry Bemis? Yes I went deep.
The enemies of Akhenaten?
Robert Langdon?
Charlemagne?
SAXON AND AVAR RIGHTS NOW!
But Louis the Pious reversed it, so it didn't happen.
Sifo-Dyas?
Do you remember anyone saying anything about a Constitutional Crisis when the National Archive sicced the FBI on a former President?
An FBI order with the power to shoot Trump if he got in the way.
Never forget.
If you have the same political beliefs as Boehm you’re a “journalist”. If you have the wrong political beliefs, you’re an “influencer”.
Does Boehm imagine he’s trying to trick high schoolers?
This is why due process matters.
However, the law used obviates that.
It's legal.
You miss the point that the law in question does not apply since it can only be invoked when the government invades or attacks, not a gang.
And this isn’t an invasion?
Somebody needs to bite the bullet and invade Molly.
I mean, all she needs to do is open her door to some of those poor TdA gangbangers she's so concerned with and this problem will likely take care of itself.
Democrat candidate films herself destroying AR, accidentally films herself creating an illegal SBR, 10 year felony.
https://x.com/firearmvideos/status/1901345792415129800
Of course, with the gas tube cut, it's a one-shot rifle.
The way she handles that grinder, I'm moderately surprised she didn't turn the cutoff wheel into an IED.
Or herself into a blind, er, vision-impaired person. Some people might hold the grinder so the debris shoot downward, but chicks, right?
At about 30-36s, where you can practically here her wondering "Why isn't this electrified magic sparkly wand do my bidding any longer?" while wiggling and torquing the disk, she does a decent job of exposing her neck from under the shield.
Even Harbor Fright angle grinders let you mount the cross grip on either side...
I support more Democrat politicians handling power tools, preferably unsupervised.
And with the safety guards removed.
All on video, please.
Ruby Ridge II?
Lol.
Politics & Poll Tracker
@PollTracker2024
Which person best reflects the core values of the Democratic Party?
(Among Democrats/Dem indie leaners)
AOC 10%
Kamala Harris 9%
Bernie Sanders 8%
Hakeem Jeffries 6%
Barack Obama 4%
Jasmine Crockett 4%
Gavin Newsom 2%
Nancy Pelosi 2%
Elissa Slotkin 2%
Chuck Schumer 2%
Tim Walz 1%
Andy Beshear 1%
Cory Booker 1%
Al Green 1%
Chris Murphy 1%
Pete Buttigieg 1%
Gretchen Whitmer 1%
Josh Shapiro 1%
Elizabeth Warren 1%
Ken Martin 1%
Joe Biden 1%
Adam Schiff 1%
Amy Klobuchar 1%
Jamie Raskin 1%
Hillary Clinton 1%
John Fetterman 0%
Reminds me of 2009 when the Bushpigs had cratered the GOP brand.
Dubya left office with a 22% approval rating - lowest of all time.
Dems took the White House, Senate, and House.
The cycle is working now as Fatass Donnie destroys the economy.
You are the Bushpigs, neocon. The entire Iraq war team endorsed Kammy last year. Not Trump.
He knows.
Not because of war, you idiot. Donnie is making noise about war with Iran like the Adelson money backed him for. He and BIbi want Muslim blood.
Kammy isn't a hawk on anything. She is as bland as as a pol can be. We could have had a Do-Nothing president if you idiots hadn't voted for a felonious con-man.
Got a cite, Bushpig?
All you can do is lie.
You're a Bushpig, pedo.
"He and BIbi want Muslim blood."
I knew that you were only millimeters away from blaming the Jews, and fluffing for Hamas.
Thanks for finally exposing yourself.
"Kammy isn't a hawk on anything. She is as bland as as a pol can be."
Of course she isn't, but she was just as much a puppet as Biden who also had a neocon hand up his ass.
But the fact that you are trying to pretend all these armchair warriors just decided to support Kamala for no reason is hilarious:
Declared supporters of Team Bush / Buttplug / Kamala:
Bush Administration VP Dick Cheney
Bush Administration United States Attorney General Alberto González (Yay, waterboarding)
Bush Administration Homeland Security Advisor Steve Abbot
Bush Administration Director of the Arms Control and Disarmament Agency Kenneth Adelman
Bush Administration Secretary of the DHS Richard C. Barth
Bush Administration Director of the National Security Council Christopher Barton
Bush Administration National Security Council Legal Adviser John Bellinger
Bush Administration Special Assistant to the President Kenneth Bernard
Bush Administration Special Assistant to the Secretary of Defense Mark E. Bitterman
Bush Administration Deputy National Security Advisor Robert D. Blackwill
Bush Administration Assistant to the Secretary of the Air Force William Bodie
Bush Administration DND Deputy General Counsel Christian M.L. Bonat
Bush Administration Assistant Secretary of State Richard Boucher
Former FBI Assistant Director Greg Brower
Bush Administration Chief Presidential Speechwriter Christopher Buckley
Bush Administration Deputy Secretary of State Jack C. Chow
Bush Administration Assistant to the President & Deputy to the Chief of Staff James W. Cicconi
Bush Administration Deputy Chief of Staff to Secretary of State Peggy Cifrino
Bush Administration Counselor of the Dept. of State Eliot A. Cohen
Bush Administration General Counsel, Dept. of the Army Benedict S. Cohen
Clinton Administration Former Secretary of Defense William Cohen
Bush Administration Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense Joseph J. Collins
Bush Administration Special Assistant to the President for National Security Affairs Cindy Courville
Bush Administration National Security Council Legal Advisor Stephen W. DeVine
Bush Administration Secretary of the Air Force Michael Donley
Bush Administration Acting Under Secretary of the Army Raymond F. DuBois
Bush Administration Senior Executive Service Dept. of Defense Martha E. Duncan
Bush Administration Under Secretary of Defense Eric S. Edelman
Bush Administration Former Deputy Assistant to the President Richard A. Falkenrath
Bush Administration Assistant Secretary of State for African Affairs
Jendayi E. Frazer
Bush Administration Deputy Assistant to the Vice President Aaron L. Friedberg
Bush Administration NSA Director of Counterterrorism William Gaches
Bush Administration Assistant Secretary of the Treasury Janice Gardner
Bush Administration Acting Attorney General of the United States Stuart M. Gerson
Bush Administration Under Secretary of State James K. Glassman
Bush Administration Deputy National Security Advisor to the Vice President Jon D. Glassman
Bush Administration Director of State Dept, Policy Planning David Gordon
Bush Administration Director of the Central Intelligence Agency and the National Security Agency Michael V. Hayden
Bush Administration Counsel, President’s Intelligence Oversight Board Seth Hurwitz
Bush Administration Acting Attorney General of the United States Peter Keisler
Bush Administration Assistant Secretary of State James A. Kelly
Bush Administration Under Secretary of Defense Kenneth J. Krieg
Bush Administration Deputy Administrator United States Agency for International Development James R. Kunder
Bush Administration Commander, United States Personnel Information Systems Command George Landis
Bush Administration Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary in the State Dept. Steven R. Mann
Bush Administration Deputy Under Secretary of the Army John W. McDonald
Bush Administration General Counsel, U.S. Information Agency Alberto Mora
Bush Administration Associate Deputy Attorney General Kenneth Mortensen
Bush Administration Director of National Intelligence and Former Deputy Secretary of State John Negroponte
Bush Administration Secretary of the Navy Sean O’Keefe
CIA Chief of Station William R Piekney
Bush Administration National Security Advisor Daniel M. Price
Bush Administration White House Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board Vice Chairman Alan Charles Raul
Bush Administration Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency Director Victor Reis
Bush Administration Deputy Assistant Secretary of Homeland Security Paul Rosenzweig
HW Bush Administration Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense Charles O. Rossotti
Bush Administration State Dept. Deputy Director of Policy Planning Kori Schake
Bush Administration Deputy Under Secretary of Defense Wayne Schroeder
Bush Administration Senior Director, National Security Council Staff and Ambassador to the International Atomic Energy Agency Gregory L. Schulte
Bush Administration Senior Director, National Security Council Staff John Simon
Bush Administration Senior Director, National Security Council Staff Stephen Slick
Bush Administration Deputy Secretary of Defense and Ambassador to NATO William H. Taft
Chief of Staff, Dept. of Homeland Security Miles Taylor
Bush Administration Deputy Attorney General Larry D . Thompson
Bush Administration Principal Deputy Under Secretary of Homeland Security Jack Thomas Tomarchio
Bush Administration Assistant Secretary of Defense John K. Veroneau
Director of Threats, Ballistic Missile Defense Organization Thomas G. Ward, Jr.
Bush Administration Principal Deputy Director, State Dept Policy Planning Matthew C. Waxman
Bush Administration Counselor of the Dept. of State Philip Zelikow
Bush Administration Deputy Secretary of State Robert B. Zoellick
HW Bush Administration Commander of the 24th Infantry Division in Iraq Major General McCaffrey
If anyone is wondering why Buttplug has discovered his predilection to antisemitism, this might have somethin to do with it:
Such a beautiful moment—the Orthodox Jewish daughter and granddaughter of the President of the United States learning to bake challah with a Chabad Rebbetzin. One of the fundamental traditions of a Jewish home! Love to see it.
I just assumed it’s because he’s a bigot in general.
John Fetterman 0%
I hope the next person who claims Fetterman will lead the Dems out of the wilderness considers this.
I've only seen Bill Maher claim that as bit of a long "We need a working class Democrat in 2028" bit.
Maher is correct of course. He hates Hamas as much as any whackjob turbo Christian does.
But Fetterman is more apt to just quit the Senate one day than run for president.
I new an Open Society big government antisemitism plumper like you would hate Fetterman and be pissed at Maher for being repelled by Hamas.
He is on the path to being the next Sinema.
Right. And what is she doing these days?
I think the main difference is that he has family money so he doesn't need to worry about a paycheck.
Got to start somewhere.
I have a buddy I served with who has done fairly well in politics, even ran for US Senate as his red state’s D candidate. Of course our military buds support him and his party, are outraged by Orangemanbad and the recent election, and are very vocal on our social media outlets.
My friends advice to them?
“Ya’ll need to keep it down, there’s a lot more people in the country that don’t agree with us right now than do”.
Clearly he has no future in his party’s leadership.
Ken Martin 1%
Had to look this guy up.
"Ocasio Cortez’s stock in the party is especially high among those who describe themselves as liberal and those younger than 45, with roughly 1 in 6 within each of those groups calling her emblematic of the party’s values. No Democratic leader polled in the double digits among older adults or moderates on this metric.
So she's got the AWFL vote.
"My favorite big-booty Latina."
Which is strange when you consider what got your original account permabanned.
Don't you love when dipshit tries to do what he thinks is locker room talk?
He spends his time watching the Disney channel.
TBH, I am trying to imagine a self-proclaimed Democrat type who has simultaneous dislike for all of these dimwits.
https://x.com/RapidResponse47/status/1901275401457930360
NBC: 44% of Americans say the country is headed in the right direction under President Trump, up from just 27% in November.
"If that doesn't seem like a lot, the last time it cracked 40%, you gotta go back to 2012. The last time it actually hit 44% or higher — January 2004."
I think she is positioning herself to primary and replace Schumer
Romania bans second non EU approved candidate.
https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/romania-bars-another-nationalist-presidential-race-opposing-eu-nato-membership
Democracy in Europe: please pick from this list of Brussels approved candidates.
Democracy in Europe: we held an election on your behalf, and here are the winners.
Romania turned into Iran so impressively...
You know who else banned non-approved candidates in Europe?
Napoleon?
Kaiser Wilhelm?
FIFA?
Suleiman the Magnificent?
NFL refs when KC is playing?
A midwife was arrested in Texas and charged with illegally performing abortions in violation of the state's ban.
Midwife, eh? I suspect the AMA will also have something to say about this.
On the scale of poor wife, mid-wife, and good wife, which ones make sandwiches?
All of them if they know what’s good for them.
When they become wives they cease making sammiches. Or so I’ve been told.
And I know for sure that no one will give a damn what the AMA says when it is said.
Given what a midwife does, how is she performing abortions? Wouldn't anything at the point a midwife is involved be more properly called murder or at best a partial birth abortion which is still generally illegal.
Jeffsarc and democrats continue to claim their support is natural and they don't have paid protestors. Reality says different as documents released showing paid protesters. Up to 1k for 2nd protest.
https://x.com/Defundmedianow/status/1901657680621556191
https://x.com/jacktronprime/status/1901638196930150729
Not surprising. These protests are not organic; they’re astroturfed in every way, shape, and form. The lack of large ones currently is due to the lack of funds. Funds that used to be funneled to these groups via USAID and other NGOs.
Hey, all those gender studies majors and part-time baristas have to make a living.
That's what government jobs are for. If there's no work being done it doesn't matter much that you don't know anything useful.
They do both. That’s what those remote jobs are for.
It’s not grassroots for a bunch of people all dressed the same to show up in busses and uhauls?
"Closing Time," was unwillingly drawn into Monday's immigration drama when the White House used that song in a disgraceful video celebrating deportations.
Fuck you, that video was hilarious.
For those of you that haven't seen it.
https://x.com/WhiteHouse/status/1901658649522503816
Think this will win an Oscar for short feature?
It can't even get nominated due to a lack of left-handed, obese, handicapped, trans persons of color with purple hair.
Could they edit one in being deported to qualify?
Could we just deport all of them?
The icing on the cake are all the shrill comments from angry democrats.
I'd be interested to see if a Houthi Rebels version of "U Can't Touch This" would go viral or, if after 30 yrs., it's still played out.
The song is self-aware?
Israel shattered a ceasefire deal with a large bombing campaign in Gaza.
When is Liz coming back again?
Exactly.
WE WANT GOOD LIZ BACK!
FUCK THIS ERIC BOEHM ROUNDUP BOTH RELUCTANTLY AND STRATEGICALLY!
I'll take mid-Liz or even Bad-Liz, they're both far better than the village idiot Boehm.
Boehm Godiva sucks.
When you finally subscribe to and watch, Just Asking Questions!
I HAVE DONE BOTH. I am in the middle of the latest COVID one.
Well finish it up already.
My commute isn't that long.
Poor Mrs. Etiquette.
"Due process" is what the law and the courts say it is. It literally means "following the rules".
For instance, I would argue that law enforcement and the state cannot simply take my assets and/or property. But in the case of civil forfeiture, the courts have said that taking your property because the government "suspects" it is the proceeds of criminal activities that it has never charged you with, let alone convicted you of, IS due process.
Similarly, deportation-related due process is markedly different than criminal law due process.
Far too many people don't know that. Even more have no idea that legal jargon has weird meanings.
I sometimes abuse legal jargon on purpose, but I try to make it clear that it is my definition, not the legal industry's. For instance, to me "perjury" is "authoritative misrepresentation" and applies to everyone pretending to be an authority and speaking as such. It applies to columnists who make blanket statements about what happened in Wuhan, with the implied and sometimes explicit phrasing that they have inside knowledge. It applies to used car salesmen bragging about little old ladies only driving to church. And then some bozo lawyers chips in with "those aren't perjury".
Lawyers are the biggest criminal class in this country.
School administration in Illinois doesn't only allow boys in the girls locker room, they also reprimand and force girls to change in front of the boys.
https://www.foxnews.com/sports/illinois-mother-files-civil-rights-complaint-says-daughter-nearly-forced-change-front-trans-student
Deerfield, part of the North Shore which is chock full of progtards who voted for Harris and help keep Pritzker in power.
The teachers and administrators in that locker room should all be charged with sex crimes against minors. And be forced to strip in court.
Then fed into the wood chipper.
From "Bake the cake!" to "Bare your bottom!"
If that is in any way accurate, any violent response by the fathers of girls in that school against the administrators responsible is justified. No jury in their right minds should convict.
"No jury in their right minds"
Sorry, those have been phased out in favor of DEI and the DNC-WEF agenda.
A jury in an 80% dem population is never in their right minds.
Democrats should have no role in deciding anything.
The average Democrat peasant/victim has already relinquished decision power to their preferred nanny-central committee betters.
The fuckers we need to kill are in the inner committee.
Lawyers have got to be lining up to take the case against the school district. I would expect the girls to receive millions in the civil case. They won the ghetto lottery and I expect the state will be paying.
Interesting new study from CDC whistleblower regarding MMR vaccine, autism, and folic acid.
https://justthenews.com/government/federal-agencies/cdc-whistleblower-mmr-vaccine-autism-study-clams-after-weldon
Donald Trump's allies have pivoted from denying that his tariffs will hurt consumers to insisting that consumers should welcome the pain...
They're twisting the it's not happening > it's happening but it's no big deal > it's happening and here's why it's a good thing flow!
Just like a crass, unsophisticated deplorable.
So taxes don't make us wealthier? Who'd have thunk it?
Democrats have been crowing that for 100 years, so their crocodile tears now are more than a little hypocritical.
(Yes, I’m calling Eric a Democrat. Reluctantly and strategically, of course.)
DEI is found to be unbelievable graft. Large self directed bonuses and raises yearly in the college system.
https://www.smry.ai/proxy?url=https%3A%2F%2Fmadison.com%2Fnews%2Flocal%2Feducation%2Funiversity%2Farticle_08215b62-00ea-11f0-90ee-dfe966018df2.html
Semisonic, the '90s alt-rock trio best known for "Closing Time," was unwillingly drawn into Monday's immigration drama...
I guess they should have thought of that before crafting a catchy assault on barflies all those years ago.
Biden was counting interior releases and flights from the BPOne app as border crossing arrests to cook the books.
https://pjmedia.com/catherinesalgado/2025/03/16/ice-director-biden-admin-cooked-the-book-on-illegal-alien-arrests-n4937959
Two astronauts stranded at the International Space Station for nine months are on their way back to Earth this morning.
How did they get back Eric?
Biden walked there himself and released them
Should be fine as long as it doesn't involve stairs.
In a capsule leased by the government.
From Elon Musk no less, when will Trump's corruption end?
https://x.com/WesternLensman/status/1900895319182713170
Western Lensman
@WesternLensman
This is how Mediaite chose to frame the successful launch of SpaceX Crew-10 on its mission to rescue stranded NASA astronauts.
"SpaceX Rocket Makes It to Space Without Exploding,"
At least they didn't call it a Nazi rocket.
Like the ones from the 60's?
Well, they could have come back on a ship made by Boeing...oh, right.
Just like SUVs driving into crowds of people, some shuttle just flew up there and got them.
I’ll repeat, does Boehm think he’s tricking a bunch of high schoolers?
No, just mimicking a bunch of high schoolers.
"That's why the system requires that the government proves its case beyond a reasonable doubt."
This ridiculous. For many of these deportations, the law allows for the President or Sec. State or AG to simply "determine" or "find" something.
“Whenever the President finds that the entry of any aliens or of any class of aliens into the United States would be detrimental to the interests of the United States, he may by proclamation, and for such period as he shall deem necessary, suspend the entry of all aliens or any class of aliens as immigrants or nonimmigrants, or impose on the entry of aliens any restrictions he may deem to be appropriate."
"The determination of what evidence is credible and the weight to be given that evidence shall be within the sole discretion of the Attorney General."
"An alien whose presence or activities in the United States the Secretary of State has reasonable ground to believe would have potentially serious adverse foreign policy consequences for the United States is deportable.
And it works the other way too...
(ii) Waiver authorized
The Attorney General may waive clause (i) in the case of an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence...No court shall have jurisdiction to review a decision of the Attorney General to grant or deny a waiver under this clause.
"The Attorney General is not limited by the criminal court record and may waive the application..."
"Nothing in this subsection may be construed to limit the authority of the Secretary of Homeland Security or the Attorney General to grant a stay of removal or deportation in any case not described in this subsection.
"Reasonable doubt" is a standard for criminal convictions. Deportation of an alien is not necessarily a punishment for a strictly criminal act. I do not believe the burden of proof by the government rises that high. Whether you gree with what Trump is doing or not, this appears to be grasping at straws for a rationale of justifying why Boehm thinks he is wrong.
I didn't see you complain back in 1830 when Andrew Jackson, a Democrat, defied the Supreme Court.
That invalidates your criticism and excuses whatever Trump does.
But the Democrats were the slavers back then.
Still are.
Amd the only member of the commentariat around in 1830 was Hank.
Unless he’s two hundred years old (and still drawing social security benefits) how exactly could he have said anything about it?
Damn you’re fucking stupid l
He thinks he’s being clever.
There is Hank.
And here we start with our daily dose of Sarcasmic strawmen!
Honestly, dudette, this particular strawman is dull, tired, boring, and just plain retarded.
How have they defied the Supreme Court?
A: It is the world's shortest book.
Q: What is "The Wit and Wisdom of Sarcasmic"?
I thought that book was just full of blank pages.
Shorter than the leaflet for Famous Jewish Sports Legends?
Hey Boehm. Was the judges order legal? Do you have any curiosity on that question? Could a lowest level judge of the federal branch override war time decisions by the president for 14 days? Or does article 2 exist? At least 4 of the USSC judges have had repeated comments regarding these inferior Courts judges and their TROs, nationwide injunctions, and rulings. Yet you have no curiosity. Weird.
By the way. This is the same judge who gave zero prison time for Clinesmith altering evidence for a FISA warrant. No question on judgement or political standing? Over 70 prison sentences to J6ers on the disrupting congress charge the USSC said was invalid. You sure he is neutral? The guy who stopped the pipelines that had valid permits. Yes, let's assume he is operating in good faith.
You're such a fucking leftist Boehm.
The president stated his authoeity. The USSC precedent on this authority is clear. It is the 200+ inferior Courts judges causing the crisis. We see democrats run to the same judges over and over. Yet you defer to them as the standards of our system. Fuck off.
EL Oh Fucking El. You cited rupar?
Boehm is both reluctantly and strategically retarded.
Sadly, he is neither reluctant nor strategic in his retardation.
to the Trump administration's attempt to punish law firms for working with the administration's opponents,
Jeff has entered the chat. Eric, does the president have priority in decisions of classification, yes or no? Did this firm help generate a false predicate for Trump Russia collusion, yes or no?
You're broken Boehm.
You don't care about ethics, standards, or the constitution.
I seem to recall that being done to Trump's lawyers during the Biden years. Maybe we should not create a bad precedent because Trump.
By the way. This is the same judge who gave zero prison time for Clinesmith altering evidence for a FISA warrant.
That kind of seems like important information for the story.
I did not know that.
Israel shattered a ceasefire deal with a large bombing campaign in Gaza. The attack reportedly killed over 400 people.
This agreement required the return of hostages no? Did Hamas stop the return and even threaten the remaining hostages?
Can we repopulate palistine by sending them 400 queers for palistine?
Mahmoud Khalil and 399 Columbia students.
And Whoopi.
Isn’t sending them Whoopi a war crime?
I know a few gang members that would fit in well there.
That would be an interesting turf war. Maybe Trump can make a reality show out of it?
It would be interesting to see which shade of brown the lefties root for.
Easy. Those Latinx would become Hispanics faster than you can say George Zimmerman. And everyone knows Europeans, specifically from Hispania, have been murdering and taking Muslim's homeland since the 700s.
Boehm title in 718: Spain breaks peace with The Moors.
JD Vance and the Reconquista are wrong.
And the UN would have charged Charles Martel with war crimes after his attempted genocide at the Battle of Tours.
Not to mention genociding the Nazis in France and Italy.
Boehm the birdbrain left out the context that hamas violated the ceasefire agreement numerous times.
If one party to an agreement does not fulfill the terms, then there is no ceasefire agreement.
The war has resumed and hamas will leave gaza, dead or alive.
The "anti-war" faction within Libertarianism are not the deepest thinkers. They kind of think "war bad" unless, possibly, it is perpetrated by brown people, then it is different.
Advocating for peace without being capable of violence in defense of peace is meaningless.
"Donald Trump's allies have pivoted from denying that his tariffs will hurt consumers to insisting that consumers should welcome the pain," writes Scott Lincicome in The Atlantic.
Shit economists are denying they have to show the effects for their claims. You, Eric, even wrote a story as if tariffs had a 1:1 effect on prices. Show your data. Tariffs have existed for over 200 years. Should be easy to do so.
Meanwhile you ignore and deny the tariff structure from other countries and keep calling unilateral trade free trade, which it is not.
That's unusually daft even for you. Of course tariffs raise prices; that's the whole point, to raise prices of imports so that that inefficient domestic producers look cheap by comparison, so people will buy them because the imports are no longer cheaper.
How in the hell can tariffs not raise prices!
I don't know why you keep responding. You're the same as Eric here. Are you a Comms major too?
I'd post a response but you'd end up crying like sarc that you're a victim.
You should spend more time investigating your beliefs instead of blindly repeating your claims that aren't backed by actual data.
Costs you'll ignore while screaming harm. Offshore jobs. Supply chain issues (see covid). Increased welfare state. Theft from other countries.
You see my view is the costs you choose to ignore are higher than the costs. That there are other suppliers if you choose to not pay the tariffs. That the end goal of free trade requires a response, not ignoring the behaviors of others in the market. But I continued learning about economics past my high school economics course. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Simple question for you. What's the higher source of taxes for you? Income taxes or tariffs? Have you seen a large growth in welfare state since unilateral trade started? What costs more, regulatory compliance or tariffs?
Simple questions for your Simple beliefs.
Lol. Now you have sarc on your side. Eric and sarc is a great buttress for your beliefs.
That's right SGT! Renounce your beliefs in economics! Renounce them! Or you will be compared to me! Muahahahahaha!
Fuck me, you have really just gone over the edge of total insanity, haven’t you?
Need to isolate Sarc. I’m curious to see how unHihnged he gets if we freeze him out.
Not a single rebuttal. You aren't even trying. How hard is it to rebut my simple assertion that tariffs raise prices by definition and by intent?
Pathetic. Blather and bluster because you know you have no facts, you know Trump is wrong. Are you afraid to say anything negative about him?
As to you changing the subject to income taxes, here's some more facts for you to ignore:
* Income tax revenue in 2024 was $5.1 trillion.
* Imports in 2024 were $3 trillion.
You do the math. You tell me what tariffs would have to be to replace income tax.
Then tell me how fast imports would drop and how much actual revenue they'd generate.
OK, you won't. You'd need a 160% tariff to turn $3 trillion into $5 trillion.
As for actual real-world revenue, that would bring in a whole lot less.
Your math is leftist.
No, Src, math is racist (the White privilege kind).
Dude, Trump's tariffs are magic. That's why they don't raise prices. His tax cuts are magic too, because they increase revenue and don't cause budget deficits. See? Magic.
Dudette, your Trump fixation has just completely taken over your life. Do you have a poster of the man on the side of your cardboard box?
sarcasmic, is inflation up? No, it is not.
Do we need to talk about the price of eggs (declined a lot in last 2 wks) and energy (also declined a lot YTD).
Nobody really knows how this will ultimately shake out. But inflation is not increasing.
The spike in egg prices due to bird flu is not inflation, and fluctuations in energy prices are not inflation either. Inflation is a general increase in prices. And when everything we import and everything made from imported materials goes up in price (because that's what happens when you tax stuff, it becomes more expensive, despite what Jesse claims) there will be a general increase in prices. Math doesn't give a shit about politics or intentions.
The spike in egg prices was caused by the bird flu "intervention". The bird flu had nothing to do with it.
It was also caused by several democrat state legislators requiring all eggs be from cage free chickens at the same time, which also happened to be when Trump was taking office. I’m sure that’s just a coincidence.
Seriously though, how evil are democrats?
They claim to love chickens. Being drowned in foaming agent is a strange way of showing it.
Fucking MAGA hens refuse to wear masks and stay 6 feet apart.
No, that’s not how that works
How in the hell can tariffs not raise prices!
This is daft even for you. If through regulatory burden or even just (lack of) infrastructure investment foreign goods outprice domestic production, even just a temporary disruption to the balance can reorient supply lines and regulations such that domestic production becomes cheaper.
The only way this is not even a possibility is magic dirt, the presumption that trade between here and (e.g.) China is *always* better than trade within the US *and* trade within China.
He doesn't understand simple concepts that reduction of domestic regulatory costs or increased domestic production to reduce irad cost per unit can reduce costs.
He believes the only costs in a market are labor and tariffs.
He will continue to ignore supply chain risk as a cost despite covid disruption just 5 years ago.
His argument requires the assumption all variables except tariffs are held constant.
For example Canada's dollar to US dollar has dropped 26% over the last few years. Importers can now buy Canadian products cheaper and subsume the majority of the tariffs compared to costs 5 years ago. This is ignored.
Meanwhile the tariffs of other countries, all higher, is always to be ignored.
No, it is simple definition. All tariffs, but especially tariffs designed to reduce imports, do so by raising import prices with taxes paid by the importers and passed on to consumers.
That is their definition and their purpose. If they did not raise prices, domestic producers would gain no benefit.
If you clowns can't respond to such simple words, then you are just simple clowns.
You're wrong.
Democrat taxes on businesses get passed along to customers in the form of higher prices because Democrats.
But Trump taxes on businesses don't because Trump.
See the difference?
One is Democrat and the other is Trump.
That's why tariffs don't raise prices. Because Trump.
Get it?
Now that I think about it, it's even more nuanced than that.
Biden's tariffs, like the ones he put on solar panels, raised prices because Biden.
But Trump's tariffs don't raise prices because Trump.
See the difference?
No, it is simple definition. All tariffs, but especially tariffs designed to reduce imports, do so by raising import prices with taxes paid by the importers and passed on to consumers.
This falsely presumes "all else being equal" or that the cost isn't inflated and/or is working at optimum efficiency or freely and isn't being manipulated to begin with. It *also* presumes that the amount of the tariffs is considerable relative to the regulatory burden.
Just because you're too stupid to imagine that it is possible for a business to gain an advantage without raising prices, doesn't make it (un)true. I know that in your retarded 8 yr. old version of economics the words "tariff" and "tax" mean the same thing the way "prices" and "costs" mean the same thing, but that doesn't mean the rest of the world indulges your stupidity, or should, or that you should inflict it on others. Just because you can produce an abundance of stupid shit doesn't mean others have to accept it.
What happens when Democrats raise taxes on businesses? If you said that prices go up because taxes are just another cost that is ultimately passed onto their customers, then you'd be correct.
Tariffs are taxes and importers are businesses. That means that raising tariffs raises taxes on businesses.
So I'll try the question again, but phrase it a little differently.
What happens when Trump raises taxes on businesses?
That's unusually daft even for you.
When Jesse is not lying he has daft to fall back on.
You want to tell the commentariat how and why you got your original account permabanned here?
turd, the TDS-addled ass-wipe of the commentariat, lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit.
Boehm also cites and links to the retardedly far left Atlantic.
Oh that caps it, I am full of shit because Boehm is full of shit. That's an excellent argument.
"Tariffs" are to MAGA in 2025 what "Obamacare" was to Democrats in 2009. They're not really sure what it does, but they are convinced it will solve all the nation's problems.
In other words, you have no fucking clue what you’re even talking about, but you’ll pontificate on it anyway.
...the White House used that song in a disgraceful video celebrating deportations.
Okay, let's settle down.
The honest truth is that any non-citizen with a face tat should be shown the door. These people are not finding gainful employment. It's a real tragedy that the Founders didn't have the foresight to write an exception for tattoos into the Bill of Rights.
+1
Can we separate New York from the union and then deport Post Malone back to his home country of New York?
I support the lgbtq+ community
Liquor guns BBQ trump quality christ
Trump administration spent Monday asserting its power to deport asylum seekers without due process
The Trump Administration said no such thing at least based on what is reported here. It's also not true that we know there is no due process since we don't know what the process is. Critics seem to believe due process is synonymous with a court conviction since that's the only event they can claim is not happening. Their criticism has evolved from "without conviction" to "without due process" since they finally got it through their heads convictions are not necessary either legally or morally. But while they changed their accusations from something specific to something broad it seems they forgot to check whether the charge remains true.
Critics seem to believe their idea of due process is what controls, and since they want Khalil kept here there seems to be an agreement they will accept only the strongest version of due process as fulfilling this requirement. But it it not the case that due process means convictions.
Due process = the executive getting permission from a leftist judge to exercise Article 2 authority.
Don't piss off the Vikings!
‘Danish Viking blood is boiling.’ Danes boycott US goods with fervor as others in Europe do so to
https://apnews.com/article/denmark-europe-france-boycott-usa-trump-6e4b568ef4ae5705ac200a3986a8ebf6
Not only are you retarded, so are they. I love this bit of cultural appropriation. Barbecue sauce is an American invention, yet they try to copy it and call it “American style barbecue sauce”:
BBQ products with and without the star mark in Bilka in Randers, Denmark, making it easier for customers to buy European goods, Monday, March 17, 2025.
"BBQ products with and without the star mark in Bilka in Randers"
You know who else used stars to designate things?
Sneetches?
You crushed that one.
First grade teachers?
Have you eaten BBQ in North Carolina?
There is no such thing as "American BBQ Sauce".
turd, the ass-wipe of the commentariat, lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit.
Sure there is, there isn't just one kind of American BBQ sauces just like there isn't just one kind of French wine or German sausage.
Yeah, eat meat the viking way. Throw it in a pot and boil for 24 hours.
They should worry more about being conquered by Islamists.
turd, the TDS-addled ass-clown of the commentariat, lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit.
VA Secretary Doug Collins: "Here is a true story about how the fake news operates.
The @WSJ reached out to us Friday with a series of vague allegations they claimed they needed VA’s help “fact checking” to make sure we “didn't see any errors” in their reporting.
Despite repeated requests, reporter @lindsayaellis, Deputy Coverage Chief @janetadamy and Washington Coverage Chief @damianpaletta refused to provide VA the basic information required to look into their allegations.
For instance, @WSJ alleges that veterans are “waiting longer to get treatment in North Texas.” They provided zero evidence of this claim other than hearsay. When we asked WSJ to name the specific VA facility & the specific wait-time data they were referencing so we could look into it, WSJ could not provide the info.
Additionally, @WSJ alleges that “Fewer VA staff are handling veterans’ claims that will get them treatment for military-service injuries & mental health conditions.” Again, zero evidence of this claim other than hearsay, & when we asked WSJ for specifics, such as the job titles & locations affected by these alleged cuts, the WSJ could not provide it.
Given the conduct of @lindsayaellis, @janetadamy and @damianpaletta, it seems clear the @WSJ is not interested in determining whether the info it prints is even true. This is the definition of fake news. Please hold your team to a higher standard, @emmatuckerWSJ!"
https://x.com/SecVetAffairs/status/1901775483231961292
Fake but accurate!
If you think you hate the media, you really don’t hate them enough.
Where's Liz? Fuck EB.
Seconded, and not reluctantly or strategically either.
Probably got arrested for using the playground.
Must have failed her democrat purity test.
Don't be like Michael, don't spread fake news.
Saw that this morning. All they do is lie.
Wrong Focus
The Democrats and their supporters are focusing on Trump's policy as an issue of immigration and civil rights. Wrong focus! Trump has presented it as an issue of national security.
Few Americans want criminals from foreign nations infesting their nation. As Rubio noted, even if those deported are not perpetrators of other their crimes, they are guilty of illegal entry. To allow them to use the judicial system to drag their proceedings out for years via appeals at great expense to the taxpayers makes a mockery of the system. To deport them by air is both inefficient and expensive. Deport them by boat.
https://www.nationonfire.com/deportation-farce/ .
Put them on a thawing glacier and push it out to sea.
Rubio has been pretty damn good the last few months.
Could we compromise and fly the deportees halfway home?
Took a mere three days for Trump's defiance of the courts to go from "He'd never do that" to "You're a poopy-head" to "Whatabout Biden" to "The orders aren't lawful."
Mississippi v. Johnson says otherwise, Sarc.
https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/71/475/
Sarc believes that whatever venue democrats holds is the correct venue of government power.
But don't dare call him a Democrat.
Former CNN host Don Lemon and Bill Maher...
LEMON: “I don't think that you can be black and be a rational MAGA person.”
MAHER: “I think they would find that very insulting.”
LEMON: “ Well I mean, the truth is often insulting.”
MAHER: Mike Pence is so homophobic...
he eats a banana from the side.
And just how did your original account get permabanned?
He was eating little boy’s bananas from the side.
turd, the ass-clown of the commentariat, lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit.
Weren't you praising Pence the other day?
Shrike is on board with Lemon.
Don Lemon is an insult to rational black people.
Is Lemon even Black? I'm darker than him in the summer.
I got halfway through the Roundup and thought this is very leftist stuff for a column by Liz. Then I checked, and sure enough, it isn't her today, it's Boehm.
Apparently to protect China and Fauci...
https://www.yahoo.com/news/public-misled-scientific-community-covid-130031079.html
The New York Times published an opinion column claiming the scientific community "badly misled" the public in an effort to suppress the theory that COVID-19 originated in a lab in Wuhan, China, even after the paper's own science writer called the theory "racist."
The March 16 piece, "We Were Badly Misled About the Event That Changed Our Lives," by Times columnist and Princeton Sociology Professor Zeynep Tufekci, argued that the scientific community long suspected COVID-19 originated in a Wuhan lab, but purposefully "hid or understated crucial facts," to mislead the public about the lab’s "terrifyingly lax" safety precautions.
"We have since learned, however, that to promote the appearance of consensus, some officials and scientists hid or understated crucial facts, misled at least one reporter, orchestrated campaigns of supposedly independent voices and even compared notes about how to hide their communications in order to keep the public from hearing the whole story," Tufekci wrote.
"...We have since learned, however, that to promote the appearance of consensus, some officials and scientists hid or understated crucial facts, misled at least one reporter, orchestrated campaigns of supposedly independent voices and even compared notes about how to hide their communications in order to keep the public from hearing the whole story," Tufekci wrote..."
Same script as the CLIMATE CRISIS!!!!!!!!!!! crew.
But, ever the NYT reporter, I found it amusing that she does the whole "of course, it was understandable at the time to dismiss these speculations since bad people were saying these things for surely evil reasons."
Is a single story in this roundup presented honestly?
Magic 8 Ball says no.
Always check the URL.
This is Reason.
I'm not a big fan of Trump's decision on the deportations here (I'd prefer they at least get a trial). That said, I really don't get what the judge's or, frankly, for that matter, Reason's line of thinking here is. Ludecke v. Watkins established that, yes, the president does have the authority to unilaterally deport those it finds to be enemies. I don't like it. But, this really is a matter of settled law. And the law isn't what I want it to be, but what it is.
Even here, Boehm is playing a whole "well, it's not really a violation, but if you look at the pattern of stuff that's not a violation...." game. The government, and in practice that means the executive branch, has played a long and consistent game of massively expanding its power and authority. They've been doing it my whole life and a lot longer. The only really striking distinction is a willingness of the elected portion of the executive to turn that power and authority on the permanent bureaucracy and its allies. If you want to say the executive shouldn't have that power (and I'm completely supportive of that) then say that and take the power away from the bureaucracy. Until then, whinging about the one portion of the executive at least theoretically answerable to the American people having the powers that the bureaucracy has long held over the rest of us is laughable.
Only got thru the first sentence.
They all had trials, and were found guilty.
NONE of them had trials. None of them had evidence presented to the deportation court as if that was an actual judicial court rather than an executive branch 'court'. And as the article says - many of them were not even identified.
Your ilk of the commentariat never surprise me as to how vile and contemptuous of the Constitution you are.
The statute doesn't require a trial or a finding by a court. You don't have to like it but it's a fact.
No it is NOT a fact and I am fucking sick of you assholes who watch TV and believe that you are acquiring facts rather than propaganda.
The statute REQUIRES:
APPREHENSION A N D DEPORTATION OF ALIENS
SEC. 242. (a) Pending a determination of deportability in the case of any alien as provided in subsection (b) of this section, such alien may, upon warrant of the Attorney General, be arrested and taken into custody. Any such alien taken into custody may, in the discretion of the Attorney General and pending such final determination of deportability(1) be continued in custody; or (2) be released under bond in the amount of not less than $500 with security approved by the Attorney General, containing such conditions as the Attorney General may prescribe; or (3) be released on conditional parole
EVERY bolded action requires a COURT to make the determination. Not necessarily judicial branch court but a court that specifically deals with immigration cases. That is why we HAVE those courts and judges. It isn't for shits and giggles. It is for DUE PROCESS. To protect individuals from the state and protect the law from bureaucrats or elected officials with power.
This sort of stuff is precisely why elections are shit. Because voters (that means YOU) are lazy and manipulated (whether by pols or by journalists) and have no fucking clue how to even judge which executives will follow the law and which will simply pander to your whims and hatreds. No juror (that also means YOU) would fall for the shit that a voter falls for. It is why a literally random selection of citizens will make for far better oversight over and check on any/all elected officials/bureaucrats than will any structural check/balance.
You can read that law and understand that it doesn't just allow police state tactics of arresting anyone and throwing them out of an airplane in international waters. But you somehow believe - as a voter - that that is ok.
EVERY bolded action requires a COURT to make the determination.
This is not true although the comment is typical of left wingers: often wrong but never in doubt. We know with certainty these judgments can be made via administrative hearings or reviews because that is how they are done now. As usual left wingers who know nothing nevertheless lecture everyone else because they're too ignorant to even understand how little they know.
That's not the statute Trump is using for these deportations. Irrelevant.
That’s rich coming from a hardcore socialist like you.
I do like it.
We should not allow any and all to come and stay here interminably based on nothing other than a self-identified status as "asylum- seeker".
Prove it, and then we might allow you in. The onus of "due process" is on the one making the claim, not the US judiciary.
“The only really striking distinction is a willingness of the elected portion of the executive to turn that power and authority on the permanent bureaucracy and its allies.”
And it’s quite telling who is having issues with it.
Doesn't matter what the judge is thinking, or what any judge thinks for that matter. Trump is going to do whatever he wants, courts be damned.
Why must you posit strawman arguments and lie?
"In 'very abnormal' development, longtime sponsors bail on San Francisco Pride"
[...]
"Several longtime corporate sponsors of San Francisco’s Pride celebrations are pulling their funding for the festivities, leaving Pride organizers searching for another way to raise $300,000.
In the past four weeks, multiple companies told San Francisco Pride, the nonprofit behind San Francisco’s annual Pride Parade and Civic Center celebration, that they would not support the 2025 Pride celebrations. In an interview with SFGATE, San Francisco Pride’s executive director, Suzanne Ford, said she was “really disappointed” by the developments.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/other/in-very-abnormal-development-longtime-sponsors-bail-on-san-francisco-pride/ar-AA1B7wTU?ocid=BingNewsVerp
The paper version tried to blame Trump instead of admitting that Trump is just a result of how the tide has changed.
Everything ungood is Trump's fault
Just how deep did all that USAID money laundering go?
Reason:
Israel shattered a ceasefire deal with a large bombing campaign in Gaza. The attack reportedly killed over 400 people.
Reality:
Hamas violated a ceasefire by refusing to return hostages as agreed, and threatened physical harm, thus ending the ceasefire.
Israel responded.
The hostages are probably mostly dead.
They were going to release them, but then they just couldn't help themselves, they had to rape and murder a few more.
Dead, or in such poor condition that it would be bad PR for Hamas to let the world see them.
glibertarians seem to be better than Reason...
"Ceasefire collapses as Israel unleashes overnight assault after terrorists break hostage deal"
>>"I don't care what the judges think."
not until Marbury is overturned anyway ...
>>Another 80,000 pages of unredacted files about the assassination of President John F. Kennedy
Was shot. Fin.
it is a pleasure now knowing Warren Commission --> Nixon --> Watergate --> Ford is president???? made no sense to me when I was a ute ... for good reason
>>Israel shattered a ceasefire deal
I have but two middle fingers to extend your way.
>>It may be too soon to call this a full-blown constitutional crisis
lol you're two months behind, bro
Adventures in Chemjeffery:
NEW: A gender studies professor who says "white empiricism" undermines Einstein’s theory of relativity sits on a top advisory panel at the Energy Department.
Meet Chanda Prescod-Weinstein, who claims string theory "failed to succeed" because the field has too many white men.
Prescod-Weinstein, a professor of physics and gender studies at the University of New Hampshire, was appointed to the High Energy Physics Advisory Panel (HEPAP) under the Biden administration in 2024.
The panel advises the DOE on research and funding priorities for particle physics, giving it significant say over which projects receive federal support.
Prescod-Weinstein will remain on HEPAP until 2027 unless the Trump administration takes action to remove her.
Prescod-Weinstein’s role at the Energy Department has rankled some scientists, who say that an institution tasked with directing federal research should not be advised by a woman who, in one 2020 paper, wrote that "Black feminist theory intersectionality should change physics."
"Her scientific accomplishments seem modest and her racialist and sexist view of science, combined with her uniquely destructive activism, ought to be disqualifying," said Sergiu Klainerman, a mathematician at Princeton University who studies the theory of general relativity.
President Donald Trump has vowed to eliminate all diversity, equity, and inclusion programs within the federal government. And while Prescod-Weinstein is not a DEI official, she has espoused some of the most extreme positions associated with DEI.
She first raised eyebrows in 2020 when she argued that a culture of "white empiricism"—in which "only white people" are deemed capable of objectivity—"undermines a significant theory of twentieth-century physics: General Relativity."
Later in the paper, she blamed racism and sexism for the slow pace of scientific discovery in physics: "String theory has failed to succeed...because the community—which is almost entirely male and disproportionately white relative to other areas of physics—is too homogeneous."
Two years later, in a blog post written with three other scientists, Prescod-Weinstein alleged that James Webb—the former head of NASA for whom the agency’s high-powered telescope is named—had overseen a purge of gay employees in the 1960s.
She continued making that claim even after it had been debunked in an 89-page report by NASA’s chief historian, Brian Odom, who wrote that "no available evidence directly links Webb to any actions or follow-up related to the firing of individuals for their sexual orientation."
After Hamas massacred 1,200 Israelis on Oct. 7, 2023, Prescod-Weinstein, who describes herself as "#BlackandSTEM and all Jewish," became a vocal apologist for the anti-Israel protests that roiled American campuses and frequently bled into anti-Semitism.
"I am enormously proud of the students who have sacrificed to fight back against a genocide," she wrote in August. "Let the students protest, and don’t fucking snitch. Free Palestine!"
Prescod-Weinstein has also said that "white Jews refuse to acknowledge that they benefit from and participate in white supremacy...wasting time that could otherwise be spent upending that white supremacy."
The Energy Department declined to comment on Prescod-Weinstein’s remarks about race and gender, but said that she attended a HEPAP meeting in December where "she contributed to discussion of several topics, all of which were related to agenda items."
One of those topics was the security measures at Fermilab, a national particle physics laboratory overseen by the DOE. During that meeting, Prescod-Weinstein expressed concern that the high level of security could exacerbate "anti-Asian" and "anti-Arabic" racism.
"I worry a little bit about the intersection of those kinds of social and structural biases with these kinds of security issues that are put into place," she said. "How is the committee thinking about ensuring that people’s Title VII rights are upheld?"
Tldr: A Biden-appointed gender studies professor who thinks "white empiricism" undermines modern physics now sits on a top physics advisory panel within the federal government.
Can Trump fire him?
She sounds like an idiot.
This is how fundamentalists of all kinds think: if the facts contradict their ideology, then the facts have to be changed.
And the people challenging her with facts need to be burned at the stake.
Democrats say there will be violence unless Trump is removed from office.
But Sarcasmic says MAGA is the real threat.
That is the wrinkliest shirt I have ever seen in my life.
Decidedly insurrectiony.
lolz
A tactical team should take them out before they can carry out their threats.
Good. Actual riots will doom the Democrats to Loser status for the next decade.
an unorthodox conception of American government in which the president pushes his powers to the outer limits, with diminished regard for the checks and balances provided by the legislative and judicial branches
How is this unorthodox? This has been SOP for decades, particularly for the last four year when nary a peep was heard from Reason.
Israel shattered a ceasefire deal
...After Hamas refused to abide by said ceasefire deal. But lets not let details get in the way of a good narrative.
However, immigration attorneys have pointed out that the administration has not released detailed information about the individuals or explained why they were chosen for deportation.
Were any of them otherwise legal residents?
Hollywood: Trump is a fascist dictator!
Also Hollywood: More than 400 Hollywood creative leaders signed an open letter to the Trump White House's Office of Science and Technology Policy, urging the administration to not roll back copyright protections at the behest of AI companies. The filmmakers, writers, actors, musicians and others -- which included Ben Stiller, Mark Ruffalo, Cynthia Erivo, Cate Blanchett, Cord Jefferson, Paul McCartney, Ron Howard and Taika Waititi -- were submitting comments for the Trump administration's U.S. AI Action Plan. (https://tech.slashdot.org/story/25/03/18/000234/hollywood-urges-trump-to-not-let-ai-companies-exploit-copyrighted-works)
E.g., Ruffalo: "Don't be fooled by Project 2025's extremist and perverse ideology," the politically outspoken actor went on. "Trump is bringing it to all our lives: abortion, LGBTQIA+ rights, freedom of expression, freedom of religion, freedom of education, and equality between the races and genders—GONE. Forced birth and forced religion. Trump's American Taliban."
Clearly we need to ban all sighted people from making visual art. Sighted people are all violating copyright by reusing the images they have previously seen as inspiration for new works of art - a clear copyright violation. They are not paying royalties for the works of art stored in their brains. We need to charge anyone who has witnessed a work of art a lifelong continuous licensing fee for the potentially stored work of copyrighted art.
I have often advocated for hiring a free-lancer to nuke D.C. I now want to add Hollywood to the list (probably best during the Oscar jerk off).
"'We Are Not Stopping'"
Can't stop.
Won't stop.
...Not sure how to stop.
A reminder: as "due process" is specified in the Constitution, it is not necessary to re-specify it in legislation.
The Consitution says " without due process of law." (twice)
It does not define the term. However, the clear meaning is that when laws allow, e.g., depriving someone of "life, liberty, or property," then the law should be followed. If a law allows for a fine of $10,000, then applying a fine of $50,000 would be a due process violation. If a law allows capital punishment for murder, sentencing someone to death for rape would be a due process violation. Constitutional violations can be due process violations, e.g., warrantless searches would be due process violations.
Laws allow the Secretary of State to deport someone "An alien whose presence or activities in the United States the Secretary of State has reasonable ground to believe would have potentially serious adverse foreign policy consequences for the United States is deportable." then once the Secretary of State states that he has reasonable ground to believe that an alien's (even a green-card holder) presence or activities in the United States would have potentially serious adverse foreign policy consequences for the United States, then deporting that person IS due process.
Nope. A mere declaration that the grounds are reasonable doesn't mean they're reasonable. There is an entire subdivision of law concerning this very issue.
Uh huh. And it all supports Trump. Case closed.
Bye bye now Shirke.
Yes. If Eric believes the law should be changed there is a process for that. The law spells out the due process required. Reason continues to cheapen their argument by lying about due process.
If "because I said so" from the executive branch is good enough due process for deporting foreigners, why is this standard of due process not good enough for other decisions made by government?
If the government accuses me of stealing a car, but I disagree and I want to appeal this decision, why shouldn't the government be able to say "you're guilty because I said so" and have that be the end of the matter?
Well, the leftists have been wishing for that for decades (at least when they control the Presidency), so let's go.
Is that what you want?
I want scotus to rule that lower courts don't have the authority to restrain the president from exercising authority clearly assigned to the executive branch, such as revoking the security clearance of a law firm.
Do you think the judiciary has the authority to restrain the president from revoking security clearances of a law firm?
I want scotus to rule that lower courts don't have the authority to restrain the president from exercising authority clearly assigned to the executive branch,
I agree - provided the Executive have that clear authority with no constraints on its exercise. The Executive simply claiming that they have authority is not good enough - except to you cultists.
I'm not a leftist. I am anti-authoritarian, unlike some self-proclaimed "libertarians" here. I do not want the government simply to declare that someone is guilty. It's no better than a bill of attainder.
How is it specified shrike?
Fuck off
So it’s not actually specified in the constitution. Got it.
No, I'm telling you to fuck off because I'm not shrike. You, however, are a cunt. It's specified where it says "due process".
Fuck off and die, TDS-addled steaming pile of shit.
Show some manners bitch.
Can't answer, huh?
Another cunt speaks
It's specified in the constitution where it says "due process".
Read it and weep, asswipe:
We should not allow any and all to come and stay here interminably based on nothing other than a self-identified status as "asylum- seeker".
Prove it, and then we might allow you in. The onus of "due process" is on the one making the claim, not the US judiciary.
Trump administration lawyers refused to give direct answers to Judge James Boasberg's questions
Because they don't have to.
about the deportation of over 200 Venezuelans over the weekend.
Oh come now, there's something a little more to it than them just being "Venezuelans," isn't there Eric.
White House's social media team had no such concerns as it gleefully bragged about sending dozens of people to a Central American prison without any proof of their guilt.
Don't need any. They're border jumping criminal thugs.
However, immigration attorneys have pointed out that the administration has not released detailed information about the individuals or explained why they were chosen for deportation.
And nobody cares. Just glad they're gone.
This is why due process matters. There's a key difference between "suspected of being in a drug gang" and "yep, we know that guy is a member of a drug gang." Eroding that distinction has all sorts of bad implications for freedom.
Not for American citizens.
the White House is showing little regard for limits on executive authority.
Since when has that been an issue for you, Eric? Or are there times when it's just (D)ifferent?
On several different issues, the Trump administration's "actions reflect an unorthodox conception of American government in which the president pushes his powers to the outer limits, with diminished regard for the checks and balances provided by the legislative and judicial branches,"
It's no big deal, Eric. You'll find out eventually. Just like we did with Obamacare and IIJA.
Where'd all that money go? ¯\(ツ)/¯
except with higher stakes since there are human lives hanging in the balance
*hand on forehead, crashes dramatically to the fainting couch*
1. It’s easy to find and deport them, 2. There aren’t that many illegal immigrant criminals, and 3. The administration doesn’t like legal immigration.
None of those things is even remotely true.
=============
QUICK HITS!
A midwife was arrested in Texas and charged with illegally performing abortions in violation of the state's ban. Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton said Maria Margarita Rojas was charged with a second-degree felony.
Right to jail. Down a hole.
Israel shattered a ceasefire deal with a large bombing campaign in Gaza. The attack reportedly killed over 400 people.
*hand on forehead, crashes dramatically to the fainting couch*
Two astronauts stranded at the International Space Station for nine months are on their way back to Earth this morning.
Thanks Elon.
writes Scott Lincicome in The Atlantic.
lol.
the White House used that song in a disgraceful video celebrating deportations
What could you possibly regard as "disgraceful" about that? I feel like the only thing it needed was a bald eagle and a flyover by the Blue Angels.
I miss Liz.
Glad to finally see the mask slipping off. Finally the MAGA crowd around here is admitting, one way or another, that they don't believe in the Declaration of Independence itself which declares that liberty is a universal human birthright. They wrap themselves in the symbols of America but they don't believe in what the symbols actually mean, they only try to appropriate the symbols for their own benefit.
The individuals who were sent to the Salvadoran prison:
- They were claimed to be members of a gang but the government did not prove that they were.
- The government admitted that many of them did not have criminal records, yet they were sent to a third-world hellhole prison as if they had committed the worst crimes.
- The government paid a third-world dictator $6 million to take these individuals off our hands and deposit them in a prison that is inhumane by American standards. At this point the prison is an outsourced black site.
Even if you think they all should have been deported as a matter of law - did they all deserve to go there? A Latin American version of a gulag? Don't you think that if a person is going to be sent to the continent's most notorious prison, that person should *at least* be convicted of *some* crime? Don't you think the government should have some higher burden of proof besides "trust us"?
The fact that so many people here are cheering this on just demonstrates that you all never believed that these individuals had any liberties to begin with. "Fair treatment" is only what loser corrupt activist librul judges do! It's no longer about justice or liberty, it's about raw power. Trump has the power so he is going to use it. You support the result so you support the exercise of that power. This is a dangerous road to be on but it's the one you happily choose because you think you will always be in the privileged class of those deemed worthy of having their liberties protected. Well, just wait until that's no longer the case.
Glad to finally see the mask slipping off. Finally the MAGA crowd around here is admitting, one way or another, that they don't believe in the Declaration of Independence itself which declares that liberty is a universal human birthright.
False, they believe in it, but it isn't their responsibility or duty to extend this protection to the rest of the world.
Notice how Pedo Jeffy bleats out general statements that don’t legally apply here, but doesn’t make an real legal argument whatsoever.
Is it the government's responsibility to extend this protection to people living within its borders?
Noooooope.
Oh okay. So to whom, if anyone, should the government extend protections of liberty?
Which government?
Look up the word "citizen" you stupid cunt.
Only citizens? So the government should not afford any protections of any liberties at all to non-citizens within its borders?
....why?
If they want to be treated like Americans, wouldn't you think they'd... y'know.... become Americans? I mean, it's a pretty nice place. And the application is pretty easy. And there's really no excuse to not be an American. Unless you're just kind of awful in general.
Or are you on board with my other plan, where we make them citizens by conquest? Because, ngl, I'm totally OK with that too.
Okay, I'm kinda tired of this nonsense.
The question I'm trying to get an answer to, is:
What rights, if any, do foreigners have while in the US, and where do those rights (if any) come from?
I have tried to ask this same question in a number of different ways, and I just get the run-around. Because I think the truthful answer, is that you all don't think they have any rights at all. That the only reason why the government doesn't just murder them all on the spot is out of a sense of mercy, not because it would be wrong to murder them.
I would love for one of you to prove me wrong, to say that no, it would be wrong for the government to torture or abuse or murder foreigners, because even though they are not citizens (and scum, and horrible people, and vermin, etc., etc.), they at least have a fundamental right to live and breathe. But I don't see you all even doing that.
What rights, if any, do foreigners have while in the US, and where do those rights (if any) come from?
Depends. Did they knock on the door and ask to come in? Did they sneak in through the back door? Were they invited and then overstayed their welcome? Did they just brazenly break in while you weren't looking? Heck, maybe they were just born in your bathtub while you were letting their mom visit (or their mom broke in and used your bathtub to give birth in, super gross btw)?
You don't seem to recognize any distinction between those things.
We don't murder, enslave, or otherwise turn them into chattel for any of those things (like we do tiny humans, which you oddly support IIRC). But we do, very rightfully, say, "Well, this is where you leave." And if they won't leave of their own volition, we enlist the aid of Someone Official to help them leave. By force.
This, in no way, infringes in ANY way, on anyone's right to life, liberty, or property as guaranteed by God and recognized by a God-fearing society. Which I'm glad to see you acknowledge and pay deference to. We'll make a solid Christian out of you soon enough, young squire.
Depends.
No it doesn't depend. All human beings are human beings regardless of how they migrated wherever.
We don't murder, enslave, or otherwise turn them into chattel for any of those things
Why not? Is it because foreigners have a right not to be murdered or enslaved? Or is it purely due to the mercy of the government to choose not to do those things - but they could, if they really wanted to?
"Okay, I'm kinda tired of this nonsense."
You could move on to a very basic factual question that is not nonsense.
Does the president have the authority to revoke the security clearances of a law firm?
No it doesn't depend. All human beings are human beings regardless of how they migrated wherever.
Right, so we won't kill or enslave you. Might put you on an airplane somewhere you don't want to go. That's fair game. Why isn't that fair game?
Why not? Is it because foreigners have a right not to be murdered or enslaved?
Yes. It's why we don't enslave or murder them. You point to me a Trump-murdered or enslaved illegal, and we can have a talk. Until then, you're just barking at the sky you silly dog.
Because I think the truthful answer, is that you all don't think they have any rights at all.
You literally just acknowledged that I acknowledge that we shouldn't be murdering or enslaving them.
See, this is where your narrative takes over your functioning human brain. You're so committed to Narrative that it short-circuits the thinking part. You literally just agreed with me, but because it wasn't The Narrative you disagreed with me. Even though you actually AGREE with what you're disagreeing with!
It's a brain destroyer, dude. Purge the wokeness. It's a social contagion and a mind virus. You've ALREADY let it infect you. Now you gotta carve that thing out before it eats any more of what's left of your brain.
I would love for one of you to prove me wrong, to say that no, it would be wrong for the government to torture or abuse or murder foreigners, because even though they are not citizens (and scum, and horrible people, and vermin, etc., etc.), they at least have a fundamental right to live and breathe. But I don't see you all even doing that.
Apparently the brain rot has affected your optic nerve, because I've done PRECISELY that throughout this entire conversation.
Of course they're people. Of course they have a right to live and breathe.
They just don't have the right to do it in America.
Nobody's torturing them. Nobody's abusing them. Nobody's murdering them. We simply rounded up a gang of criminals, and sent them to a better place than their country of origin while we work out their legal status in America.
WHY is that so objectionable to you? And why will the worm in your brain keep you from answering that question?
Only to citizens.
Everyone else, and I mean everyone, is here at our whims.
At our suffrance.
Is there anything that the government may not justly do to foreigners?
Which government?
The government under which the foreigner is residing, and the one which has current jurisdiction over the foreigner.
Define "residing."
"to dwell permanently or continuously "
So, that includes squatters then?
Yes.
Okie dokey. Let's talk about squatters rights.
Name them.
Name just ONE of them, libertarian radical individualist.
That depends on the electorate, and their representatives.
I genuinely am sorry that you believe in global governance, it's a poison of the mind.
Speaking of raw power, do lower courts have the authority to restrain the president from revoking the security clearance of a law firm?
I thought I already gave you my answer to this question. Oh well, here it is again.
https://tinyurl.com/4eym5st2
"Good Faith" chemjeff.
Not to trolls like Troll Mac, no. He doesn't deserve it.
Do you think trolls should be taken seriously?
Do you think Troll Mac acts in good faith?
Left Wing Privilege means those who do not argue in good faith can still preen about it.
Right-Wing Privilege means acting like a total douchebag, and then whining about how much of a victim he is when he's called out about it.
Too lame to come up with your own theorems then? That's pathetic, but not surprising to those who know you.
So you admit to doing these things? Good.
Now do the right thing for once, and take the honorable way out.
https://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/B0CRD36RHG/reasonmagazinea-20/
Across the belly, from hip to hip, horizontally.
That isn’t you.
It isn’t nearly fat enough.
+1
It won't be long before the MAGAs drop the pretense and argue that fascism is good.
Why in the world would you think MAGAs would ever become Democrats/Globalists/Marxists?
Idiots should not display their idiocy so publicly.
Fuck off and die, steaming pile of TDS-addled shit.
No, we won’t be joining the democrat party.
You have already embraced fascism. We’re the ones fighting against it.
Another stupid cunt. Which American party has bee busy trying to control the economy, restrict speech and other individual liberties, and defining a rigid political orthodoxy? You know, fascism.
they don't believe in the Declaration of Independence itself which declares that liberty is a universal human birthright.
Sure they do. And that's why we're protecting it from illegal criminal aliens who seek to exploit our morality in order to deprive us of things like life, liberty, property, and pursuit of happiness.
You don't seem to understand that protecting that universal human birthright NECESSARILY MEANS rounding up all the bad people and throwing them down a hole forever. THEY are the threat to liberty. Not the people rounding them up to protect American liberty.
Even if you think they all should have been deported as a matter of law - did they all deserve to go there?
Why do you have a problem with "there?" If anything, we're doing them a kindness. Isn't the leftist argument for amnesty that their country of origin is so bad that we are obligated to take them in?
Well, this meets it halfway. We won't take them in, but we'll send them somewhere better than their home country. Like an El Salvadoran prison. That's better than Venezuela, which I was told was a hellhole we couldn't send them back to.
You should be happy we sent them there. That was the most humane thing to do.
Not sure if serious.
Oh, it's serious.
Which is worse, Venezuela or El Salvador?
You already know it's Venezuela. That was your argument for why they should stay. Well, they're not going to stay, period. So, we shipped them back to somewhere that's not where they demanded amnesty and claimed persecution from.
Why aren't you happy about this? Venezuela is the bad guy here. We expressly did NOT send them back to the bad guy.
Or, wait a sec, IS Venezuela the bad guy? Should we be accepting claims of amnesty from persecution from there? But if they ARE the bad guy, didn't we do something right in shipping them NOT to Venezuela?
Also, why is the liberty of criminal aliens more important to you than the liberty of the average law-abiding American citizen?
Okay, not serious.
Nope, very serious.
Which is worse: Venezuela or El Salvador?
If it's Venezuela, we can talk about amnesty for its persecuted refugees. And we definitely won't send any border jumpers back there. We'll send them somewhere better. El Salvador.
Or, is El Salvador worse? In which case, we should be returning said border jumpers to Venezuela.
Which is it?
You keep calling him not serious, yet you keep arguing with him.
Here's a serious question. Does the president have the authority to revoke the security clearances of a law firm?
Stop messing with my chewtoy. This brings me so many lols. Why would you want to deprive me of that?
Human laughter is God's favorite prayer.
Hay Fatfuck, do lower courts have the authority to restrain the president from revoking the security clearance of a law firm?
Its main protest organization is Columbia University Apartheid Divest (CUAD), which claims to represent almost 100 student organizations. The group defines itself as “fighting for the total eradication of Western civilization.” It regards both Israel and the United States as illegitimate “settler colonial” entities. (It refers to our country as “Turtle Island.”) CUAD likes terrorist groups — or, in its words, “armed resistance.” With grandiose bombast, it effusively praises Hezbollah, the Houthis, the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine, and Hamas — and in particular, Hamas’s massacre of Oct. 7, 2023, which it found especially inspiring. CUAD has promised that it will “not stop demonstrating until Zionism ends.”
Bad news for left wingers. As I predicted yesterday the full truth of Khalil's support for terrorism is breaking into the mainstream, this excerpt is from the Boston Globe. The original source however is the Columbia University newspaper.
This is not the first time the mass-media's desire to hide the facts led to them being scooped by a campus paper. The same happened during the Duke Lacrosse Hoax with the NYT and others maintaining the hoax long after every even slightly informed observer knew the story was bunk. Meanwhile the Duke paper had it right almost from the start showing even the most basic tents of journalism would have led the NYT to the truth if only the had cared about it. Ideology always comes first at our major media organizations. But while the media still acts as if they can prevent a story from coming out in fact they no longer have that power.
Your Quick Hit bullet item seems to blame Israel for breaking the ceasefire. It was actually Hamas that did this by refusing to release hostages. Do better Reason. Do better.
Reason is pro Hamas.
So, now they've got the crown prince of TDS doing the roundup? Between him and Jacobin Sullum's rage bait, and the new kids who are emulating them, 90% of the posted articles here are some variety of JS:DR anymore.
Fucking Reason, my days of not taking you seriously have certainly come to a middle.
Clearly, Good Liz is the Chosen One. She must ascend to become Libertarian Supreme, and use her mastery of the Libertarian Arts to bring order and enlightenment to Reason.
So I read the press release about the abortion arrest in Texas and predictably Eric's description is dishonest. The midwife in question actually owns and operates multiple clinics staffed by non physicians that the state claims are performing abortions. If this true this is not midwifery as most of us understand the term. It's a cover for performing illegal abortions. We can argue about whether or not Texas should prohibit abortion but Reason should at least be honest about it.
Hey, "reproductive freedom" has nothing to do with reproduction.
What's the due process suppose to be about? Whether they're legal citizens? Think the due process is already closed book on that case since they're seeking asylum.