Sheriff Says 'Public Trust' in New Mexico Law Enforcement 'Is Completely Lost' Because of Police Corruption
"This is a gut punch," says Bernalillo County Sheriff John Allen. "This is a kick to my balls and two black eyes, to be honest with you."

This was not a good week for John Allen, the elected sheriff of Bernalillo County, New Mexico. "I have never been betrayed like this in my life, and I'm pretty frickin' pissed off right now," he announced at a press conference on Thursday, striking the lectern for emphasis. "I am very angry right now."
Why is Allen so angry? On Monday, Undersheriff Johann Jareno, whom Allen described as "my right-hand man" at the Bernalillo County Sheriff's Office (BCSO), resigned at Allen's request after he was implicated in a long-running, far-reaching police bribery scheme involving employees of three law enforcement agencies who took payoffs in exchange for making DWI cases disappear. The next day, Deputy Jeff Hammerel, whom Allen had placed on administrative leave a month ago after learning that the FBI was investigating him, pleaded guilty to federal bribery and extortion charges.
Hammerel admitted to conspiring with Albuquerque defense attorney Thomas Clear, his paralegal, and "a supervisory BCSO deputy" (an apparent reference to Jareno) to help Clear's clients avoid prosecution and keep their driver's licenses. In exchange for cash payments, Hammerel would refrain from filing DWI charges or deliberately miss hearings, pretrial interviews, or trials, allowing Clear to seek dismissals based on the arresting officer's absence. That scheme, which also involved the New Mexico State Police and nearly every officer assigned to the Albuquerque Police Department (APD) unit charged with apprehending drunk drivers, began in the 1990s and continued through 2023.
The sheriff took another hit on Wednesday, when the Albuquerque Journal published a photo of a beaming Allen with his arm around Ricardo Mendez, who played a central role in what prosecutors call the "DWI Enterprise" as Clear's paralegal and investigator. In the photo, which was taken during a February 2023 lunch at a Little Anita's restaurant, Jareno is standing behind the sheriff and the confessed racketeer, his smiling face visible between them.
All of this sheds light on the grievance that Allen vented a couple of weeks ago in an interview with KRQE, the CBS affiliate in Albuquerque. Allen complained that the FBI had not kept him apprised of its corruption investigation, which became public in January 2024 after agents searched Clear's office and the homes of several Albuquerque police officers. "I'll cooperate with you," Allen said, explaining his attitude toward the FBI, "but I don't have any more trust in you."
As Allen now concedes, it was actually the other way around: In light of his close working relationship with Jareno and his chumminess with Mendez, federal investigators did not trust him. "Why did the FBI not trust Sheriff Allen?" he said at the press conference, repeating a question he said he had seen "in social media." He answered that question with another question: "How in the hell would the FBI ever trust me when my right-hand man, who speaks for me, [was a suspect]?" He added that "of course they're gonna suspect me when you find me in a photo with this guy"—i.e., Mendez, whom Allen called "a piece of crap."
Allen was already nervous about his connection to Mendez during his February 12 interview with KRQE. "I was actually friends" with Mendez, who "donated to my campaign," Allen said then, and "I met with Tom Clear." Allen worried about "the perception that they had access to me," saying, "it really does bug me because that perception is out there." On Thursday, he complained that local news outlets were "starting to defame my character" and emphasized that appearances can be deceiving.
Jareno, who started working for the BCSO in March 2009 and served in its DWI unit from December 2011 to October 2019, "introduced me to Mr. Mendez" in 2021, Allen said at the press conference. Although Allen is a Democrat and Mendez is a Republican, Mendez liked Allen enough to donate $200 to his 2022 election campaign. (Jareno, for his part, donated $1,000.) Although "I'm not gonna remember exactly how many times I met with Mr. Mendez," Allen said, they would discuss "my behavioral health plan" and "what I was going to do about the crime problem" and "corruption," which "in hindsight" is "very odd" because corruption "was already here."
Allen, who took office as sheriff in January 2023 but had worked for the BCSO from 2001 to 2019, said he had no inkling about the corruption in his office until the FBI investigation revealed it. "If I ever knew that Mr. Jareno and that Mr. Mendez were doing what they were doing," he said, "do you think in all hell I would ever have a lunch with him? No, I would not."
That lunch, which Allen said Jareno "set up," happened "three weeks into my term," he noted, and "it is OK for me to have lunch." As a "a politician and the sheriff," he said, he has a lot of lunches and poses for many photos. This particular picture, he emphasized, does not mean "I have anything to do with this DWI scandal."
Allen said he also was not aware of Mendez's criminal record, which KRQE says "dates back to 1990" and includes a felony conviction involving "more than 60 pounds of marijuana," which resulted in 18 months of probation. The Albuquerque Journal reports that Mendez also faced a cocaine charge, which "was dismissed after prosecutors stated he had furnished 'information'" helpful to an ongoing investigation. "Why would I ever ask if he had a criminal conviction or his criminal history if he was already a paralegal?" Allen asked reporters. "That's not something I would ever assume."
The lunch at Little Anita's—during which Allen had pancakes but "didn't eat all three of them" because he "was full," in case you were wondering—may have been just as innocent as the sheriff describes it. But Allen engaged in a bit of revisionism when he said, "I wouldn't even call it a friendship," referring to his relationship with Mendez. Just a couple of weeks ago, after all, Allen volunteered that he "was actually friends" with Mendez. And even if Allen did not "have anything to do with this DWI scandal," his trust in Jareno was obviously misplaced.
"It makes me sick to my stomach…knowing he was that close to me," Allen said. "I literally got sick and threw up in my garbage can."
Like Allen, Albuquerque Police Chief Harold Medina insists he had no clue about the corruption discovered by the FBI. Medina's avowed obliviousness is hard to fathom, since he first joined the APD in 1995, has held senior positions for more than a decade, and has run or helped run the department since 2017.
According to a lawsuit by drivers arrested for DWI, Medina "ratified the conduct" of corrupt officers by "failing to intervene after receiving multiple notices" that they were "violating the law." In December 2022, for example, the APD got a tip that DWI officers, including one who later pleaded guilty to federal corruption charges, were getting paid to make sure that cases were dismissed. The investigation of that tip did not find any evidence of bribery. Nor did the APD under Medina keep careful track of officers' court appearances, which might have revealed a suspicious pattern of absences and dismissals in cases involving Clear's clients.
Allen, by contrast, emphasizes that he has been running the BCSO only since January 2023. But is it plausible that he never caught wind of Clear's racket during his prior 18 years with the BCSO?
Allen himself suggested that deputies who were not directly involved in the scheme may have heard about it. "If you ever knew anything about this and you didn't do anything to stop it, get the hell outta my agency," he said. "We have a duty to report…We have a duty to intervene."
The evidence so far suggests that corruption was less pervasive in the BCSO and the state police than it was in the APD, where it involved "almost the entire" DWI unit. In addition to Hammerel, three APD officers have pleaded guilty so far, along with Mendez and Clear. Another dozen or so officers—including the former commander of the APD's internal affairs division, his deputy, three lieutenants, and a state police sergeant who had been lionized for nabbing drunk drivers—have been publicly implicated in the "DWI Enterprise." Since that scheme goes back decades ("30 years," according to Allen), it could easily involve dozens of officers.
Allen defended his decision not to conduct an internal investigation, as the APD did. "Everybody keeps asking me about an internal affairs investigation," he said. "I'm so sick of hearing that question. I will not do anything to interfere with the criminal investigation [by] the Federal Bureau of Investigation."
Allen did not want to speculate as to what that investigation might ultimately find. "Would I ever be surprised that anybody else would be named?" he said. "I [wouldn't] at this point, really, in terms of what happened in the past before I was here and then what happened months into my tenure….We've seen this thing blow up in the last 16, 17, 18 months. Nothing at this point really surprises me anymore."
In his KRQE interview, Allen seemed more upset about the FBI investigation than he was about the corruption it had uncovered. But yesterday, he sounded appropriately concerned about the latter. "This isn't a black eye to the agency," he said. "This is a gut punch. This is a kick to my balls and two black eyes, to be honest with you." Public trust in law enforcement "is completely lost," he admitted, "and we have to rebuild it."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
The Good Guise.
He’s only pretending to be surprised in order to fool the public into thinking this is kind of thing is rare.
He is really trying to make everyone believe that he worked for the Sheriff's Dept for nearly 20 years and never caught a whiff of this? Was he that oblivious? Did he exert no control over the deputies under him? He didn't notice the number of DUI cases dropped or dismissed and find that odd? He didn't find it strange when deputies continually missed court dates, filing deadlines etc?
"They were doing WHAT to those Jews?"
~Adolph Hitler
Sheriff, if you trusted your cops . . . you aren't competent enough to lead them.
If you had an ounce of integrity, you'd fire everyone and then resign yourself. Let the people get a new sheriff in who can rebuild the force.
If the investigation finds he was unaware and uninvolved, and if he's willing to work under the added scrutiny of a department trying to recover from as big a scandal as this is, I'm fine with letting him make the attempt,
If he was unaware and uninvolved that just means he wasn't paying any attention to his cops and letting them run wild.
Or, if John Allen had the ability to lead, like Elon, he would fire EVERYONE, rebuild. He could start by ordering all unconstitutional and immoral laws NOT be enforced. Next, contact the law makers to repeal those immediately or be exposed by NAME.
JS;dr
JS;dr
JS;dr
Js Dr.
It would be interesting to see if the headline is true.
But it's jsdr
It's an "ignorance is bliss" virtue signal party!
More training, higher pay.
That's all they need.
Bullshit. Paying more just means the bribes will have to be bigger. The entire culture of police work in New Mexico is totally corrupt. From cops pulling attractive young women over and exchanging oral sex for leniency, cops taking outright bribes, cops coercing confessions from people who did nothing wrong, New Mexico is filthy. It's not the pay, that's absurd. It's an atmosphere of corruption and it emanates from the very top.
Whooosh! Get your sarcometer checked.
Don't get me killed, new guy.
Look everyone, the crucial thing is that the lawyer was the guy who devised the scheme, not that potentially dozens of cops in multiple departments willingly participated and recruited more cops into the scheme. A scheme that the lawyer came up with, don't forget!
^ This.
Except not really. The cops--potentially dozens of them across multiple departments over roughly three decades--involved are just as scummy as the lawyer and deserve to be subject to the full weight of the law.
In fact, civil asset forfeiture should be initiated on everything the cops and lawyer all own, since it's more likely than not some of them were paid for by illegally gained money. The cops and laywer can then pay to prove their innocence in court at some distant later date. Their pensions should be forfeit as well, and they should consider themselves fortunate to remain in prison for only most of the remainder of their lives.
The cops are scummier.
Lawyers are not in a special position regarding moral authority upholding the law.
Why are the cops scummier? They just went along with the scheme. How is that more scummy than the guy who came up with and carried out the scheme?
That's ACAB talking.
It's like blaming the mooks and henchmen instead of the villain. Yes, the henchmen are all bad guys who did bad things and deserve consequences for their actions - but the true villain is the one who orchestrated everything.
The meatheads in clown makeup are not the equal of The Joker.
Yeah, but all cops bad, fuck the pigs Boomer jargon, something something.
Some bad guys wear a badge, so libertarians like to extrapolate that badges make you a bad guy. I wonder if they apply that same logic to the number of absolute shitbags in prison and at large who share their anti-government leanings. Better round up everyone with anti-government leanings, just to be safe.
Except not really.
Then why'd you say it?
JFC LOL
Just covering for you, buddy. To ensure your imbecilic opinion is noted in every one of these stories. You could be at CopCon '25 this weekend for all I know.
Here I was hoping you saw reason and overcame existing prejudices.
Oh well.
Poe’s law strikes again.
Don't forget, many judges over that time apparently didn't notice a pattern either. Why was that?
They probably did and just looked away. Just like they do when cops tell obvious lies in court.
Personally I think it's fear of retribution. Judges know how far police will go because they see it in court all the time. If they speak to loudly about police corruption then they put their lives and the lives of their families at risk.
Oh for crying out loud. Turn off Netflix.
Cops lie about everything and everyone knows it except the idiots who still trust them. In the academy they get more hours being trained in mendacity than in the law. They're trained to get convictions, not to tell the truth or uphold the law. So they lie to the members of the public they interact with, they lie on their reports, they lie in court, they lie about everything.
Every judge, every prosecutor, and every defense lawyer knows this. There's even a word police use for when they speak in court. They mockingly call it testilying.
Since everyone knows this, especially judges, the only explanation I can think of for them letting it slide (unless there's a big media stink that gives them no choice) is fear of retribution.
I said turn off Netflix. Not turn it up louder.
Truthfully? Because it's muni/traffic court.
They don't care. It's an assembly line.
"*sigh* on the docket today we have... three speeders, two DUIs, and a reckless. OK DUI, how do you plead? Not guilty? Anything from the prosecution? Arresting officer didn't show? OK case dismissed. Next case please."
I doubt they put very much thought into it at all. Like, what reason would a judge have to think, "Gosh, it's so weird that we dismiss so many DUI's on account of the cops not showing up." Especially if that's an established pattern of behavior from them. Is he supposed to take off his black robes and put on a sherlock holmes hat and dig into this strange mystery? Come on.
Few, if any, people are being in any way realistic about what we're talking about here. That precisely WHAT the lawyer was taking advantage of.
Exactly this. The scheme worked so well because it was low-level graft that required the cooperation of a handful of players in different positions of power. They knew for years not to take it too far, until they did take it too far and got caught.
Heard anything lately about billions and billions of dollars stolen from you by USAID for insane causes nobody approved? Funny how we never heard a peep from the LP, the RNC, Rand Paul, Reason, etc. They must have been in on it since it was so obvious and not uncovering graft is now proof you were in on the graft.
They don't care. It's an assembly line.
They are literally paid to care. That is the only thing they are there to do. If the judges do not care, that means they are not judging. Judges who cannot or will not judge should not be judges.
That is so stupid it's not even worth dignifying.
They judge the merits (or tell a jury to) of each case as it's brought before them. They determine whether evidence is admissible or not. They make sure that the rules of procedure are followed. They have no stake in the outcome, nor should they.
They have no business saying, "You're bringing in way too many DUI cases" or "You're not bringing in enough DUI cases." They have no business "Gosh I really hope we nail this guy" or "Man, it sucks we couldn't nail that guy because the cop didn't show - why aren't the cops showing."
Impartial and Objective. That's the name of the game.
You have less than zero idea of what you're talking about. This is hands down the stupidest post you've ever put on this site, ND.
I suspect it would be a far tougher pattern to spot from the position of a judge.
1. It's not uncommon for the arresting officer not to make a court date for a reason that doesn't involve corruption. Sick, forgot, had to work to cover another absence, etc.
2. The scheme didn't involve letting every DUI/DWI arrest get cleared. If the defendant gets a different lawyer, you show up. Only if payment is made to the right lawyer does the officer no-show.
3. Not every cop making a DWI arrest was involved in the scheme with Clear. So it would be possible for Clear to work a DWI case because the officer showed up.
Um No. While we shouldn't "forget" the lawyer when it comes to doling out prison sentences, I'm much less concerned about ONE lawyer, who I will probably never encounter, and would have a Choice whether to employ or not VS a Dozen cops, many of whom I could encounter randomly if I drive through New Mexico.
You tell me, which is more important to the average person? One scummy lawyer (in a field that's already known for general scummyness 🙂 ), who just Might get me out of an unjustified DWI charge, VS the worst sort of criminals in uniform, who the state has given the privilege of totally f**ing up your day by pointing a gun at you and arresting you? And if they were willing to accept bribes to "sweep DWI's under the rug", how many of you really think all those arrests were legitimate? (And if you do, I have some swam..I mean "prime real estate" in FL for sale. LOL.)
Obviously everyone involved deserves some kind of retributive justice. The lawyer more than most, because he's the ringleader. But just because we go hard on the lawyer, doesn't mean we therefore go soft on the henchmen.
I didn't... I didn't even know this was a thing...
Oh look, Rick James comes here to tell us that he believes everything that his Youtube algorithm presents to him.
So... you don't believe that Dylan Klebold's mom did a Ted Talk? You think that's some Alex Jones, Vladimir Putin conspiracy theory? Okayyyyy.
Sounds like New Mexico police are just like Old Mexico police.
It would be unsurprising if Allen's department had links to the cartels.
"Compared to other nearby counties, Bernalillo County has more democratic voters."
https://bestneighborhood.org/conservative-vs-liberal-map-bernalillo-county-nm/
"In his KRQE interview, Allen seemed more upset about the FBI investigation than he was about the corruption it had uncovered."
That's to be expected. Corruption is part of the job. They're always surprised when (if) it comes to light and something is done about it (temporarily). The problem is that the psych screening for cops looks for low intelligence, low empathy, high aggression and high psychopathy. Then you teach them how to lie, reward them for lying, and even encourage them to commit perjury, while ignoring any crimes that they commit. It's a recipe for disaster.
"Public trust in law enforcement is completely lost and we have to rebuild it."
No, Sheriff, you're wrong! You don't have to rebuild public trust in law enforcement. You have to completely rebuild law enforcement from the ground up. You have to completely eliminate all of the unconstitutional victimless crime laws and regulations and stop trying to be the morals police, leaving the doors wide open to police corruption. Even after all that you still have to exercise unrelenting diligence in holding your officers to the highest practical and ethical standards, carefully investigating every hint of corruption or abuse and prosecuting your officers as you would any other criminal suspect. You will have to get out of bed with the Police Officers Union in the inherently corrupt and incestuous relationship required currently for a Sheriff, a Mayor or a Police Chief to be appointed or elected to positions of trust. Finger pointing and blame shifting and fake outrage and apologies will not accomplish any of that. Law enforcement officers should not patrol or do community policing. They should investigate reported crimes, serve properly approved search and arrest warrants, and take charge of prisoners and evidence securely. And that's ALL they should do!
Well said. Although they can't really do anything about the actual laws on the books. Thank the state & federal legislatures for those. (They can, in some cases, "neglect" to enforce some of the stupid laws).
That last part I'll disagree with though; despite the supreme courts ...well Stupid ruling, officers should, in addition to their duties to enforce the law, Help anyone that needs it. "Serve & protect" should be a reality, not a joke on the side of a cop car.
We can start by abolishing ICE and replacing it with an agency that doesn't do unconstitutional warrantless searches.
The Land of Entrapment
You should work for the NY Post. That's too good for Reason.
Not mine. It's been around for a long time
Trump will pardon all of them.