Richard Nixon Privately Admitted Marijuana Was 'Not Particularly Dangerous'
The recordings demonstrate yet again that drug warriors always knew marijuana wasn't that bad—they just didn't care.

While America has long had restrictive drug laws, the "war on drugs" is considered to have begun in earnest in June 1971. "America's public enemy number one," President Richard Nixon proclaimed in a press conference, "is drug abuse. In order to fight and defeat this enemy, it is necessary to wage a new, all-out offensive."
Recently discovered audio of Nixon's private conversations indicates that he may not have completely believed what he said.
During his presidency, Nixon infamously recorded thousands of hours of his conversations; the existence of recordings in which he discussed the Watergate break-in and cover-up proved key to his downfall. In recordings from 1972 and 1973, as reported by The New York Times, Nixon admitted to aides that perhaps marijuana wasn't as bad as he was publicly letting on.
"Let me say, I know nothing about marijuana," Nixon says in March 1973, in a grainy audio recording that is hard to hear at times. "I know that it's not particularly dangerous; I know most of the kids are for legalizing it."
"But on the other hand," he continues, "it's the wrong signal at this time."
In October 1970, Nixon had signed the Controlled Substances Act into law, which categorized marijuana as a Schedule I narcotic—the most severe classification, reserved for substances "with no currently accepted medical use and a high potential for abuse."
But in private, the president expressed misgivings about overly punitive sentences for marijuana. "The penalties are ridiculous," he told John Ehrlichman, his domestic policy advisor. "I have no problem with the fact that there should be, there should be an evaluation of penalties on it, and there should not be penalties that, you know, like in Texas where people get 10 years for marijuana. That's wrong. In other words, the penalties should be commensurate with the crime."
In another recording from September 1972, just weeks before Nixon would stand for reelection, White House Counsel Charles Colson spoke about Democratic presidential candidate George McGovern's support for decriminalization "and maybe reducing the penalties" for marijuana use. "Actually I'm for, I am for modification of penalties in many areas," Nixon noted, "but I don't talk about it anymore, exactly."
"Well sure, it's a responsible position to reduce some of the penalties," Colson replied.
This even-handed attitude was absent from Nixon's policy platform. In fact, in March 1970, LSD researcher Timothy Leary received a prison sentence of up to 10 years for possessing less than an ounce of marijuana. But instead of advocating "reducing the penalties," Nixon—who saw Leary as an enemy—did the opposite: "I want a goddamn strong statement on marijuana," he told Chief of Staff H.R. Haldeman in May 1970. "By God we are going to hit the marijuana thing, and I want to hit it right square in the puss." Nixon declared war on drugs the following month.
Nixon's private acknowledgements, contrasted with his public pronouncements, are certainly infuriating. In 2020 alone, more than 317,000 people in the U.S. were arrested for marijuana possession—which actually represented a 36 percent decrease from the previous year. Black Americans represented nearly 39 percent of that total, despite accounting for less than 14 percent of the total population.
Not that any of this would likely have been news to the Nixon White House. When the Controlled Substances Act placed marijuana into the most severe category, Nixon formed the National Commission on Marihuana and Drug Abuse to study the issue. In 1972, the commission released its report, Marihuana: A Signal of Misunderstanding, which among other things unanimously recommended decriminalizing the personal possession and use of marijuana, encouraging "persuasion rather than prosecution." Despite having picked nine of its 13 members, Nixon ignored the commission's findings.
Ehrlichman admitted the drug war's real motivations to journalist Dan Baum in 1994:
The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders, raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did.
The new revelations that Nixon and his aides privately expressed uncertainty about the efficacy of criminalizing marijuana is maddening when considered in the context of how many people have been arrested and had their lives turned upside down simply for possession. But as the historical record shows, this information was freely available at the time; they just didn't care.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
What is dangerous is progressives shooting at former and likely future president Trump. Wasn’t there a Reason editor that called for violence against folks “on the right?”
I do seem to remember one advocating for some kind of wedding.
What’s wrong with that?
I think many were calling for a gay wedding where bakers would be forced to make the cake.
Red cake, for a red wedding.
Not Migrants.
Not Illegal Migrants.
CITIZENS OF FOREIGN COUNTRIES VOTING IN OUR ELECTIONS.
Old news. Until next month.
tReason just can't stop attacking Republicans.
Was this a puff piece on Nixon?
Nixon—who saw Leary as an enemy—did the opposite: “I want a goddamn strong statement on marijuana,” he told Chief of Staff H.R. Haldeman in May 1970. “By God we are going to hit the marijuana thing, and I want to hit it right square in the puss.” Nixon declared war on drugs the following month.
Lancaster goes back in time to divine what Nixon thinks about Timmy, and sarc sees this as a positive gesture about the GOP.
Sarc posts his strawmen so reflexively, he no longer bothers to stop and think whether they even apply to the article.
His brain is severely damaged from several decades of severe alcohol abuse.
I what? I’m sorry but you’ll have to explain to me what it is you think I see.
You guys make up shit that I think and then argue against it so much that I just can't keep track of all the strawmen.
Man. Your projection this morning is in over drive. You literally filled the roundup with your strawman lies. And then you blame others. Lol.
So Nixon was a Puss Grabber huh?. I'm going to need to see Hank weigh in here.
And a girl bullyer!
He wanted to grab it in the pussy?
Puff as in puff-puff-pass. Now I get it. Almost funny.
It's cool to do puff pieces as long as you don't inhale.
The most Seattle thing you'll read all week: Director of Seattle Wing Luke museum (a person of color) forced to resign over planned exhibit on antisemitism after employees stage walkout in protest:
Yeah, let's include some Arab, Muslim and Palestinian perspectives on Jews...
excluded Palestinian, Arab and Muslim perspectives.
We tried to page them but the line was dead.
You win
Nice.
I was told that Rose Mary Woods erased all of the tapes with Bitbleach and smashed Nixon's Blackberry with a hammer. Sounds like a cheap fake to me.
What? Like with a cloth?
It was known decades ago that Nixon's drug war was a way to go after minorities. There's nothing new in this article.
In other news, both Lou Reed and General Franco are dead.
Fuck really? You're gonna' make Hank's head explode.
I'm actually surprised not to see him here. He thinks Nixon is still in office.
I'll take a silent moment for Francisco.
In newer news so is Bob Newhart and James earl Jones.... Awww now I'm sad again
When I see decent people like that die, I always think of the pinko scumbags that continue to exist.
Was Nixon an expert? What's the importance of his opinion on the dangers of marijuana? He probably thought he knew what a woman was, too.
He never claimed to be a biologist.
Or a pharmacologist.
He was a bad drunk though.
What is important is that Nixon threw out the report of a commission that investigated marijuana and found no reason for banning it or regulating it more strictly than alcohol. This recording shows he knew he was wrong, but went ahead anyhow, continuing to ban marijuana and classify it with heroin.
Nixon did not start the war on some drugs. That started in 1906 with the founding of the FDA in the Teddy Roosevelt administration, and was made worse by most of the Presidents up through Nixon and Reagan. Marijuana was ignorantly and irrationally added under FDR. But Nixon had a good reason to relax the laws on marijuana, and chose not to - either from blatant prejudice against "hippies" or because he considered it politically useful to follow the prejudices of some of his supporters.
You can shit on Nixon all you want but if it weren't for him I'd be a Canadian right now. I had my draft lottery number and my bags were packed. Nixon, in his wisdom, shut down the draft. That's right a fucking Canadian. Shithole third world dictatorship but without the good weather. I'd have probably ended up in Ontario where they've probably banned Reason magazine. I might have, in my Canadian ignorance, voted for Zoolander. With any luck I'd have ended up in Alberta in some frozen oil field where the brown heroin was readily available, in season. Or left to drink shitty pilsners like Molson's or Bier Beer. Nixon either saved my life in Nam or arguably saved me from a fate worse then death in the frozen wilderness above. So just fuck off with your NDS.
Bravo, Sir!
Even worse mother's lament would be your neighbor
Just another sleazy unethical oppressive Republican president.
A hypocrite when it comes to marijuana prosecutions and a fan of price controls? Remind you of anyone?
Does it start with K and end with authoritarian cunt?
"But on the other hand," he continues, "it's the wrong signal at this time."
Still is.
There's plenty of reasons to hate on Nixon but the Ehrlichman quote by Dan Baum was almost certainly fabricated and any "journalist" should know that.
The Controlled Substance's Act wasn't Nixon's idea. The law was mandated by the Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs treaty, ratified by the Senate and signed by either JFK or LBJ (I think JFK but it's not clear). It actually reduced federal penalties for marijuana offenses.
A fuck ton of people who weren't alive in the 1970s and trust media outlets like reason actually believe Nixon is responsible for the criminalization of marijuana despite the fat the Marihuana Tax Act was passed by a Democrat-controlled Congress and signed into law by FDR.
^THIS
Controlled Substance Act of 1970
Introduced by Harley O. Staggers (*DEMOCRAT*–WV)
FDA act of 1938
Introduced by Royal Copeland (*DEMOCRAT*–NY)
Signed by FDR
This was during a long term period of Democrat control of the House of Representatives. For all its talk of the need to downplay the notion that a president is entirely responsible for what the government does on his watch, Reason staff will certainly play into that idea when it fits the story they want to write.