Rebel Ridge, Netflix's Civil Asset Forfeiture Revenge Flick, Is a Thrilling Political Action Movie
Writer-director Jeremy Saulnier's movie is the rarest of things: a taut, tense thriller about...public policy.

Jeremy Saulnier's Rebel Ridge is the rarest of things: a taut, tense thriller packed with rip-roaring action that is also a detailed and believably accurate story about public policy.
Specifically, it's about civil asset forfeiture and small-town municipal budget corruption.
Yes, this is a civil asset forfeiture revenge film. Rebel Ridge follows an ex-Marine with a very special set of skills, who gets knocked over by a pair of local cops and effectively robbed of the large bag of cash he's carrying to bail out his cousin and set himself up with a new life. But because the cops say they suspect it's drug money, the robbery is perfectly, infuriatingly legal.
Rebel Ridge, which debuted on Netflix last week, is both smart and immaculately crafted, with a series of methodical buildups that come together for some of the most satisfying, electrifying action beats of the year. It's part Taken, part Jack Reacher, and a whole lot of Rambo in First Blood, though it never feels derivative.
The film starts when Terry Richmond (Aaron Pierre) gets unceremoniously knocked off his bicycle by a small-town squad car. The cops say he fled, and they use the threat of wasting hours of his time to get him to allow a search of his bag. The bag, it turns out, contains $36,000, ten of which is for bailing out a cousin who, because he was once a cooperating witness, would be a marked man if he went to jail. The rest is to start a small business.
Because his cousin was charged with a drug offense, the cops seize the cash, claiming they suspect it's related to illegal drug activity. With the help of a friendly local court clerk (AnnaSophia Robb), Richmond learns he has the right to sue to get it back, but that would take months and cost more than what he lost. And if he fights the seizure, the cops threaten to hit him with a bevy of charges that could land him in jail.
Richmond tries to negotiate with the local police chief, Sandy Burnne—played with cocky, infuriating menace by Don Johnson (yes, that Don Johnson)—making what he believes is a deal to let the chief keep most of the money, as long as his cousin gets bailed out. But Burnne doesn't honor the deal. So Richmond begins to negotiate in other ways.
Richmond, it turns out, is not just any former Marine. Although he never fought in an actual warzone—one reason why Burnne initially believes he poses no threat—he trained other Marines in a form of defensive combat aimed at disarming opponents.
What follows from this setup is a series of increasingly tense encounters between Richmond and Burnne's small local force. Richmond finds increasingly clever but non-lethal—or at the very least "less lethal"—ways to take down his opponents. In the process, he discovers he's not the only victim; the forfeiture scheme is part of a vast municipal funding conspiracy.
This is wonky stuff, and sometimes the movie descends into dense legalese. But for the most part, it's cleanly explained and plausible, with every new revelation adding to the tension.
It's hard to stress how unusual it is that a movie like this even exists.
What's even more unusual is that it's genuinely good as both a policy procedural, tracing the legal mechanisms by which the local police force ruins people's lives in order to fund an armory full of weaponry, and as a high-stakes action thriller, with nested setups and revenge-film payoffs delivered with surgical precision. There are multiple pump-your-first-and-cheer moments in the movie, thanks partly to Saulnier's dead-on pacing and geographically coherent action choreography, and partly to Pierre's should-be-star-making turn as Richmond.
It's incredibly effective—and other filmmakers should take note.
As Bulwark critic Sonny Bunch posted on X, Rebel Ridge "is a more effective piece of activism than every politically minded documentary of the last five years combined." That might be an overstatement. But it's a forcefully political movie that leaves viewers with no doubt about its point of view.
Yet it's not what we normally think of as a political movie: There are no moralizing speeches, no saccharine subplots designed to tug shamelessly at your heartstrings. It doesn't end with a to-the-camera lecture that sounds like a political fundraising mailer. This isn't an op-ed in movie form that bluntly spells out what you should think.
Instead, there's a sympathetic hero—a (mostly) ordinary man wronged by an abuse of government power enabled by a shockingly unjust system. Rebel Ridge draws you in by crafting a character worth rooting for. And in rooting for him, you end up rooting against the grotesque real-life system that wronged him.
It's rare, in other words, because it's a stridently political film that simply does what movies are supposed to do: It tells a gripping story—and it makes you care.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
I'm going to watch it and see if it is any good. I would like Hollywood to be far better than they typically are and a movie about civil asset forfeiture is a beginning.
I saw it a couple days ago. Pretty good. 7/10
We watched it last night.... Excellent.
Scrolling through movies to watch, it suddenly jumped out at me. It's baldly Libertarian.
“I’m lookin’ for a heartbeat!”
-Don Johnson
"my girl wants to party all the time."
~Ed
Excellent.
A plus from Suderman is as good as a stab wound for movies as a rule. This one–you can bet–does not reveal the link between asset forfeiture looting-by-law and flash crashes, REAL crashes and the pet-eating Hooverville Depressions Republicans call normal business cycle corrections. Then again, maybe somebody trustworthy will recommend the movie.
But which side is MAGA and which side is noble progressive visionaries? Did the government rightfully confiscate property to achieve DEI? Is speech violence or is violence speech?
There are multiple pump-your-first-and-cheer moments in the movie
I often pump my first, but I usually do it second, after the cheering.
What part does the Black Man play?
The hero. Duh.
is a more effective piece of activism than every politically minded documentary of the last five years combined."
How to tell me this movie beats its audience over the head without telling me it beats the audience over the head.
To be fair - every action\revenge flick does this. Only most of the time it beats you over the head with the comically and over the top evil (and why is he evil? he just is) of its antagonist. Here at least there is an explanation - he is a cog in the states extortion racket.
Yeah it's not really a good versus evil tale and it doesn't beat you over the head. Everybody is screwed by the system.
Ask John Demjanjuk if being a cog works as an excuse.
When does the FBI sniper shoot the woman holding her baby?
In real life, the FBI would certainly be involved.
Are we sure it wasn't an assault baby?
The naked racism of Reason’s commenters is truly a thing of beauty.
You should probably stop taking quite so many psychedelics.
You're responding to somebody referencing Ruby Ridge and you think that's racist?
Qued up to watch tonight. Sounds like fun.
Alright I watched it and I agree with Suderman that there's much to like. The hero is a black actor but I didn't see any heavy handed racial messaging. Played the part convincingly. The asset forfeiture is the setup but the incentives for it are the meat of the plot and some of the bad guys, including the Don Johnson character, are almost sympathetic at times. Vaguely reminiscent of The Wire. Also found it interesting that despite all of the action scenes only one character actually gets killed and it's almost incidental to the plot. Of course it's all completely implausible but still more libertarian than 99 percent of what's out there and manages to get there without any tedious lecturing. So 7/10 entertainment 10/10 for the libertarian messaging, however subtle.
Loved it! My libertarian mind is drawn to this type of story. Funny how I rooted for the black guy even thought democrat sheep keep telling me I'm a racist.
My opinion of Netflix just did a one-eighty! This is the first Netflix movie I have watched in the last five years or so, with the exception of "Dark Winds" which was a serial.
We watched this last night in a dreadful night of no plan that usually ends with searching several platforms and finding nothing to watch. Saw this pop up and I exclaimed "Don Johnson? Hell Yeah we are watching this" It was a very interesting film. Went several ways I never thought it of as I was expecting a "Rambo/ Vengeance/ Cops bad- Stranger good" over used premise. (The fact I am 56 and the lead looks to be mid 20's listening to Iron Maiden told me something was going to be different) I wont repeat the same lines from the review above but I would say it was a bit too long in the end. When I am interested than I find I am falling and look and there is still 37 minutes left is never a good sign but agreed its a well done (And performances, Don still got it!) in nice change in story from what we are use to getting.
They had to add the “black guy harassed by evil White cops” angle.
What was surprising is that this was on Netflix. I liked that the movie talked about civil asset forfeiture and how it is just a money grab by police and local governments. In typical fashion there were some stereotypical aspects such as it occurred in Louisiana, the races of the victim versus villains which is to be expected. Still it is a good movie worth seeing.