Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Election 2024

Harris' Deceptive Ad Scandal

Plus: Subway crime stats, millennial wealth building, CNN roasted, and more...

Liz Wolfe | 8.14.2024 9:30 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
close-up of Kamala Harris laughing | 	Nathan Howard/UPI/Newscom
( Nathan Howard/UPI/Newscom)

If this isn't "misinformation" I don't know what is: Kamala Harris' presidential campaign has been running Google ads, just like many others. The only problem: Her campaign is deliberately making it look like news outlets like The Guardian, NPR, Reuters, the Associated Press, USA Today, and Time magazine are on her side by running ads designed to look like flattering headlines.

Axios first reported this and noted that former President Donald Trump's campaign has not done the same. (If it had, I suspect that you would be hearing far more about this story, with this practice repeatedly condemned as one that spreads misinformation.)

Though the practice does not technically violate Google's policies, with a spokesperson saying sponsored content is "easily distinguishable from Search results," it looks… shockingly deceptive. Judge for yourself.

Though "the ads include links to real articles from the news outlets…the headlines and supporting text have been altered to read as though the articles support the Harris campaign's objectives," notes Axios. An ad that links to the Associated Press contains the headline "VP Harris's Economic Vision—Lower Costs and Higher Wages" with a subhead reading "A future where every person has the opportunity not just to get by but to get ahead. We won't go back to the failed trickle-down policies that hurt working families." An ad with a link to NPR uses the headline "Harris Will Lower Health Costs," along with a subhead reading "Kamala Harris will lower the cost of high-quality affordable health care."

"Spokespeople for brands such as CNN, USA Today and NPR, whose links appeared in Harris for President ads, said they were unaware their brand was being featured this way," reports Axios. And, an unconvincing response from the culprits themselves: "A source familiar with the Harris campaign's ads team said the campaign buys search ads with news links to give voters searching for information about Vice President Harris more context."

I honestly fail to see the reason for editing these ads to make it look like these news outlets are on Harris' side—the original headlines are flattering enough.

CPI comes in: In July, consumer prices rose 0.2 percent, up 2.9 percent over the last 12 months.* Core prices, which strip out food and fuel, were up 3.2 percent compared to a year ago. There were no massive surprises; this was all roughly aligned with what analysts expected, though it is notable that "this is the first time that overall inflation, measured on a year-over-year basis, has come in below 3 percent since March of 2021," per The New York Times' Ben Casselman.

There were upticks in both food and shelter indices (the food index, notably, had fallen in June), per a Bloomberg analysis of the report.

This report may be "among the last inflation readings that will matter hugely to the Fed and Wall Street," noted the Times' Jeanna Smialek prior to the release. "We're already starting to focus a lot more on the job market, and if this reconfirms that inflation is on a cooling trend, heading back to the central bank's 2 percent goal, I think the focus is going to shift even more."

The Federal Reserve had already telegraphed intentions to cut interest rates this September, and the fact that this consumer price index report is roughly aligned with people's expectations makes that move even more likely.


Scenes from New York: "Mr. Ademolu spends his days like this, pacing Manhattan subway platforms and stations, searching for people who appear severely mentally ill. He is a member of a Subway Co-Response Outreach, or SCOUT, team, a new project between the city and the state-run Metropolitan Transportation Authority," writes The Manhattan Institute's Nicole Gelinas in The New York Times. "His work represents the newer of two strategies that New York's city and state governments are using to dispel the atmosphere of disorder and danger that permeates the subways. The other is more old-fashioned policing and prosecution. Success for both depends on New York creating a functional mental health system and recreating a functional criminal justice system. If this strategy works, it could become a model for other American cities struggling with crime and mental illness."

The piece is really good, contrasting policing approaches of the past with those of the present, and positioning arrests within the context of a criminal justice system that declines to prosecute things like fare beating at a much higher rate than in the past. ("This year, as Hannah Meyers at the Manhattan Institute has found, of 6,041 transit-system arrests, prosecutors declined 33.6 percent of cases and dismissed 22.5 percent. This collective 56.1 percent rate is higher than the 36.7 percent in 2018, when District Attorney [Cyrus] Vance stopped prosecuting most fare-beating; the rate was 15.6 percent in 2017.")


QUICK HITS

  • Antitrust regulators set their sights on the stupidest possible target: Breaking up Google.
  • "Millennials are now wealthier than previous generations were at their age," reports The Wall Street Journal. "The biggest driver of that increase was real estate. Millennials' housing wealth grew $2.5 trillion, after accounting for the additional mortgage debt they took on. A colossal jump in home prices benefited owners, whether they scraped together a down payment in the early 2010s or squeaked in just before the recent leap in prices and rates." But real estate isn't the only factor.
  • What it's like to swim in the cleaned-up Seine.
  • Solid takes on the policy idea of exempting tips from taxes, which we first saw trotted out by Trump and which Kamala Harris is now copying:

There is no good reason for exempting tips. A worker at McDonald's making $15/hour in wages vs a worker at a sit-down restaurant making $15/hour (wages + tips) should be treated exactly the same for tax purposes https://t.co/P1qCcfLVc0

— Jeremy 'adjusted for inflation' Horpedahl ???? (@jmhorp) August 12, 2024

  • Please stop with the yas kween headlines:

I don't know if I can do three more months of this. pic.twitter.com/rF9ZMy6Zn0

— Drew Holden (@DrewHolden360) August 13, 2024

  • The laugh line that poor Stephen Colbert didn't realize was a laugh line!

NEW: Audience starts cracking up after a serious Stephen Colbert tells CNN's Kaitlan Collins that CNN "just reports the news as it is."

Remarkable.

Colbert: "I know you guys are objective over [at CNN], you just report the news as it is."

Audience: *Laughs hysterically*… pic.twitter.com/9R8iv2UXeN

— Collin Rugg (@CollinRugg) August 13, 2024

*CORRECTION: A previous version of this post misstated the inflation number from July 2023.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Does Your State Let You Work Without Government Permission?

Liz Wolfe is an associate editor at Reason.

Election 2024Reason RoundupPoliticsCampaigns/ElectionsKamala HarrisEconomics
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (479)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Fist of Etiquette   10 months ago

    If this isn’t “misinformation” I don’t know what is…

    I guess we shouldn’t have been so quick to run that Ministry of Misinformation theater kid lady out of town.

    1. HorseConch   10 months ago

      Misinformation seems like way to nice of a word. Anything less than full tits communist-style propaganda is an understatement.

      1. Medulla Oblongata   10 months ago

        The way it seems to be defined by the media is “misinformation” is information that Democrats disagree with, but can’t really disprove (e.g., someone’s stated opinion), while “disinformation” is any material that is verifiably true, but damning to the Party.

      2. Fire up the Woodchippers! (5-30 Banana Republic Day)   10 months ago

        Maybe Kaitlyn would be more convincing if she got her breasts augmented to DD’s.

        She should do that so we can find out.

      3. B G   10 months ago

        The difference is that for the most part, the Communist regimes used the threat of criminal punishment (and the fact that the outlets were all state-run) to compel at least some of the journalists who participated in their schemes.

        The “Blue Anon” media in the US is agressively complicit with or without being asked. Just look at how quickly the notion that JD Vance is “wierd” went from being mentioned by a campaign staffer to being worked into the nightly “news” copy as if it were actually part of the story (as opposed to some version of quoting that staffer as saying “wierd”).

        If you remember the panty-twisting supercut of the “mind control” supposedly at play because the local newscasts for a number of recently acquired TV stations (because the FCC forced the networks to fire-sale their “owned” affiliates all at once, and there just aren’t a ton of prospective buyers at that level ready to go) read a statement from their new ownership, which was introduced and prefaced as exactly that by whichever employee (in some cases on-air talent, in others it was station management) read the letter as instructed, that was the left freaking out over a procedural exercise which was carried out with full transparency.

        When a dozen different network/cable news anchors suddenly choose to adopt Harris campaign talking points as their “style guide” with no disclosure or explanation, that’s what “mind control” really looks like.

    2. Mike Parsons   10 months ago

      Nah, it was the right move. As a regime mouthpiece, she would be telling us how it isnt *really* dangerous misinformation like Trump and bad red voters.

      1. Mother's Lament   10 months ago

        Pretty sure Fist was being facetious.

        1. Don't look at me!   10 months ago

          What? He never ….

          1. Stupid Government Tricks   10 months ago

            … well hardly ever …

            1. Fist of Etiquette   10 months ago

              YOU DON’T KNOW ME.

              1. Don't look at me!   10 months ago

                An enigma wrapped in mystery.

                1. R Mac   10 months ago

                  Wrapped in a riddle…

                  1. InsaneTrollLogic (Factio Democratica delenda est 5/30/24)   10 months ago

                    Boxed in a puzzle…

                    1. VinniUSMC (Banana Republic Day 5/30/24)   10 months ago

                      Dipped in chocolate…

                    2. JesseAz (5-30 Banana Republic Day)   10 months ago

                      And nuts.

                  2. Ersatz   10 months ago

                    and finally Wrapped in bacon

              2. Stupid Government Tricks   10 months ago

                OH YES I DO!
                https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c548RjB8jzQ&t=56s

      2. R Mac   10 months ago

        That’s sarc’s job.

    3. Minadin   10 months ago

      “it looks… shockingly deceptive. Judge for yourself.”

      I wouldn’t say it looks shockingly deceptive, given who’s behind it, but I would say that it looks deliberately, obviously, and intentionally dishonest.

      1. JesseAz (5-30 Banana Republic Day)   10 months ago

        Next you’re going to tell me her entire campaign of Joy is deceptive.

        1. Mother's Lament   10 months ago

          Her campaign is literally this.

          You can’t make this stuff up.

          1. VinniUSMC (Banana Republic Day 5/30/24)   10 months ago

            Don’t you dare besmirch Ren and Stimpy! They are paragons of excellence compared to Kamala.

            1. Mother's Lament   10 months ago

              *Kamala walking on stage with Walz, they’re waving to the audience as the audio track blasts*

              If’n you ain’t the granddaddy of all liars!
              Think of the little critters of nature…
              They don’t know that they’re ugly!
              That’s very funny!
              A fly marrying a bumblebee!
              I told you I’d shoot! But you didn’t believe me!
              Why didn’t you believe me?
              Happy Happy Joy Joy
              Happy Happy Joy Joy
              Happy Happy Joy Joy
              Happy Happy Joy Joy
              Happy Happy Joy Joy
              Happy Happy Joy Joy
              Happy Happy Happy Happy
              Happy Happy Happy Happy
              Happy Happy Joy Joy Joy!

        2. Spiritus Mundi   10 months ago

          Nah, that is just weird.

        3. Don't look at me!   10 months ago

          Like the crappy photoshopped crowd scene at the airport.

          1. CE   10 months ago

            Well, it wasn’t technically AI, because it wasn’t that technically advanced, but rather old-school amateur style photo manipulation.

        4. CE   10 months ago

          And that she was lying about Biden’s mental decline, when we all know he was sharp as ever right up to the debate, but then had a cold and didn’t have his best day?

          I mean, normal Midwestern Dad/state champion football coach/Master Sergeant combat veteran/leave people alone popular governor Tim Walz checked on Biden right after the debate and declared him “fit to serve.” What more proof do you need?

    4. Medulla Oblongata   10 months ago

      https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/opinion/time-magazine-s-kamala-cover-is-one-more-reason-for-americans-to-be-disgusted-by-liberal-media/ar-AA1oKKTU

      Time magazine’s Kamala cover is one more reason for Americans to be disgusted by liberal media

      The political press demonstrated daily that it has zero self-respect. It is fawning over the “momentum” and gravitas of Kamala Harris while the candidate has refused to do interviews or press conferences for weeks.

      At the head of this servile line is Time magazine, which published a painterly portrait of Kamala with the words “Her Moment.” In between puffy clouds of prose, Time writer Charlotte Alter admitted “Harris has yet to do a single substantive interview or to explain her policy shifts. (Her campaign denied a request for an interview for this story.)”

      It’s quite a contrast to Donald Trump, who Time interviewed for a cover story in April. That interview went long enough for Time.com to tell you the transcript was an “83 Minute Read.” On top of that they did a long “fact check” that was a “21 Minute Read.”

      Giving access to the press gets you precisely nothing.

      There is no “fact check” for Kamala, since there was no interview. Instead, Alter offered repeated comparisons to pop-music superstars. She began: “The soundtrack suggested a Beyoncé concert. The light-up bracelets evoked the Eras Tour [of Taylor Swift]. And the exuberant crowd—more than 14,000 strong, lining up in the rain—resembled the early days of Barack Obama.”

      Overall, Alter summarized, “Harris has pulled off the swiftest vibe shift in modern political history.” The media pretend that Harris creates “vibe shifts,” as if their incessant proclamations about her “momentum” and her “joyous warrior” poses aren’t part of the vibe-shifting attempt.

      Even Kamala Harris the Horrible Boss is dismissed. We’re told she’s been let down by poor staff instead. “One challenge for Harris has been the people around her. Over the years, a rotating cast of senior staff has clouded her message and raised questions about her abilities as a manager.”

      1. Mickey Rat   10 months ago

        The media celebrating the utterly substanceless character of the current Democrat ticket is a fascinating exercise of propaganda in action.

        1. Commenter_XY   10 months ago

          Textbook….straight from Pravda.

      2. Earth-based Human Skeptic   10 months ago

        Well, do you want to vote for Joy! or mean tweets?

      3. CE   10 months ago

        This is almost too easy….

        Do you know who else made the cover of Time?

        1. Don't look at me!   10 months ago

          OJ?

      4. markm23   10 months ago

        “One challenge for Harris has been the people around her. Over the years, a rotating cast of senior staff has clouded her message and raised questions about her abilities as a manager.”

        Was someone else hiring these people without consulting her? To me, inability to identify competent staff when hiring is incompetent management, and having everyone quitting frequently is a sign of something worse. She is hardly more capable of handling the job of President than poor demented Joe is.

    5. Nardz   10 months ago

      Remember when yall freaked out over $4b to build a wall?

      https://x.com/interstatejuche/status/1823712648434974771?t=QHZOGU7ZB0MIclyBejwbcQ&s=19

      $451 billion a year would be the total gross domestic product of the 36th largest economy in the world. Just to house and care for a bunch of people who shouldn’t even be here. There are no words in human language to describe how insane this is. Send them all back TODAY.

      [Link]

      1. Mother's Lament   10 months ago

        But think of the food trucks and the cultural enrichment.

        And $451 billion a year is a small price to pay for cheap gardeners, nannies, and pool boys.

      2. Super Scary   10 months ago

        Well surely those same people generated at least $452 billion, right? I was told these people are a net benefit for our country.

    6. CE   10 months ago

      I had just assumed the DNC was already writing the media’s headlines.

    7. B G   10 months ago

      Her solution would have been to compel the news outlets being targeted to start publishing articles advocating the positions and endorsing the ideas that the Harris campaign is claiming.

      And that the chocolate ration has been increased to 30 grams per week.

      Is it any wonder that Harris would simply assume the endorsement and adulation of all of the “news” outlets who eagerly accepted the memo with their marching orders from the Biden administration as to which angles to take when covering the Congressional investigations into Hunter’s “business” relationships overseas?

  2. Fist of Etiquette   10 months ago

    Her campaign is deliberately making it look like news outlets like The Guardian, NPR, Reuters, the Associated Press, USA Today, and Time magazine are on her side by running ads designed to look like flattering headlines.

    To be fair, it’s only a matter of time before they are.

    1. HorseConch   10 months ago

      How fast would there be a cease and desist with an accompanying lawsuit if Trump did the same thing?

      1. JFree   10 months ago

        Maybe they should force the issue rather than whine?

        1. R Mac   10 months ago

          So you want Trump to lie? Honk honk!

          1. JFree   10 months ago

            So – whine it is. Lie will only happen next time he opens his mouth

    2. Mike Parsons   10 months ago

      That’s honestly the biggest surprise here. 1, that they aren’t, and 2, that axios called it out.

      1. Spiritus Mundi   10 months ago

        Oh, but they are grasshopper.

      2. R Mac   10 months ago

        About that…

        I was shocked yesterday when I saw Axios publish an investigation reflecting negatively on Kamala’s campaign.

        But soon as the reporter,
        @sarafischer
        , was attacked for doing it, she immediately denigrated her own scoop, saying it was no big deal and Kamala did nothing wrong.

        https://x.com/ggreenwald/status/1823708833342226678

    3. Social Justice is neither   10 months ago

      They’re just cutting out the middleman for the sake of efficiency. Nothing more than the vertical integration of the captured propaganda industry.

      1. A Thinking Mind   10 months ago

        As if the DNC isn’t already writing headlines for these publications. She’s just editing and tweaking the headlines her allies already wrote.

    4. Moderation4ever   10 months ago

      Likely it will be done with AI like her fake crowd sizes. Trump needs to drill done on this as I am sure at some point he will find that Kamala Harris has a duplicate key to the icebox and she was stealing strawberries.

      1. A Thinking Mind   10 months ago

        Hey, that’s misinformation! That crowd wasn’t AI generated, it was photoshopped. If it was AI generated it would have been more floompy.

    5. Earth-based Human Skeptic   10 months ago

      Um, when have these state media outlets NOT been on her side?

  3. JesseAz (5-30 Banana Republic Day)   10 months ago

    Group has spent millions contacting citizens Act Blue claims have donated to their site and democrats. 60,000 claimed they never made the donations. Multiple state AGs are now investigating.

    https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/campaigns/presidential/3120079/actblue-donor-fraud-investigation-biden-harris-campaign/

    1. Mother's Lament   10 months ago

      Investigating or “investigating”?

      If it’s the first it’s because their far-right-wing cranks. If it’s the latter I’m sure that they are the very soul of prudence and honest inquiry.

      1. JesseAz (5-30 Banana Republic Day)   10 months ago

        Alabama, Virginia, Texas. So think former.

        1. InsaneTrollLogic (Factio Democratica delenda est 5/30/24)   10 months ago

          Hopefully they RICO ActBlue.

          1. Minadin   10 months ago

            RICO’s a difficult charge to prove, unless your target is Trump.

          2. Fire up the Woodchippers! (5-30 Banana Republic Day)   10 months ago

            We should RICO CNN, MSNBC, etc. for serial violations of FEC rules.

    2. Illocust   10 months ago

      I thought this had already been proven in the past. Huh, guess not.

    3. Rick James   10 months ago

      Wasn’t this discovered years ago, where there were thousands of people showing up on lists as “donors” to the DNC and they had never donated a single dollar? And then it was dismissed as no “widespread” donor fraud.

  4. JesseAz (5-30 Banana Republic Day)   10 months ago

    Green Energy paves the way as Nantucket wind farm fails and materials fall into the ocean and pollute beaches.

    https://www.zerohedge.com/commodities/experiment-gets-f-minus-nantucket-residents-fume-over-broken-wind-turbine-blade

    1. Don't look at me!   10 months ago

      They are no doubt the same people who are concerned about “fossil fuels”.

    2. Eeyore   10 months ago

      Did any if it get stuck in a turtle’s nose? I’m told that is what really matters.

  5. Fist of Etiquette   10 months ago

    …the headlines and supporting text have been altered to read as though the articles support the Harris campaign’s objectives…

    It’s a sad day when the Democrat running for president can’t get editors to write flattering enough headline for their corporate journalists’ puff pieces.

    1. Red Rocks White Privilege   10 months ago

      To be fair, is it really misinformation? These people ARE actually in the tank for the DNC and act as their in-kind shills. The only issue here is that Harris and the Democrats aren’t even bothering to pretend anymore that this isn’t the case, same as they stop pretending after 4 years that Biden was still fully lucid and not an increasingly senile meat puppet.

      1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   10 months ago

        And it all adds up to a smothering joy-fest campaign, devoid of content but chockfull of feelz and virtue-signaling. Who said all those liberal word salad yard signs were a waste?

      2. Commenter_XY   10 months ago

        We don’t have a free press anymore, we advocacy journalism instead.

  6. JesseAz (5-30 Banana Republic Day)   10 months ago

    Though the practice does not technically violate Google’s policies, with a spokesperson saying sponsored content is “easily distinguishable from Search results,” it looks… shockingly deceptive. Judge for yourself.

    Google also admitted to a “glitch” that made these ads appear to be sponsored by the media companies instead of the Harris campaign.

    1. Social Justice is neither   10 months ago

      Which of their VPs is internally nicknamed “glitch”?

      1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   10 months ago

        I know of a VP named “Slut”.

        1. Fire up the Woodchippers! (5-30 Banana Republic Day)   10 months ago

          I thought it was named ‘whorish pinko retard’.

  7. Ra's al Gore   10 months ago

    Tim Walz called Hitler-promoting cleric a ‘master teacher’ at Islamic center event
    https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/campaigns/presidential/3118707/walz-called-hitler-promoting-cleric-master-teacher/

    1. Ra's al Gore   10 months ago

      Was Tim Walz Deployed to Bagram Airfield? Here Are the Facts
      https://www.newsweek.com/tim-walz-kamala-harris-running-mate-deployment-claim-bagram-afghanistan-election-2024-1938657
      In a Monday post on X (formerly Twitter), commentator Ben Braddock said Walz had written a speech “where he claimed to have ‘stood one night in the dark of night at Bagram Air Base in Iraq’ and watched an American soldier’s body get loaded onto a plane.

      “Bagram is in Afghanistan, not Iraq. Walz didn’t deploy to either,” Braddock added.

      The post, which has been viewed 3.5 million times, includes a copy of prepared remarks by Walz for a 9/11 commemoration at the Minnesota State Capitol, republished by the Minnesota Military and Veterans Museum for the profile anthology Minnesota in the Global War on Terrorism.

      The 2021 remarks were shared widely on X as proof that Walz had falsely claimed to have been deployed to the Bagram air base when describing his time in the National Guard after the 9/11 attacks.

      According to the anthology’s prepared remarks, Walz said: “In the years after that classroom, I had the privilege of serving in this state’s national guard.

      “I stood one night in the dark of night on the tarmac at Bagram Air Base in Iraq and watched a military ramp ceremony—a soldier’s body being loaded onto a plane to be returned home. And if you’ve seen it, you don’t leave the same.

      “It makes you wonder, what are we doing? What are we trying to get to? And then watching as all of you have been, the confusing last few weeks with the Taliban takeover of Afghanistan.”

      1. JesseAz (5-30 Banana Republic Day)   10 months ago

        Waltz is the retarded leftist gift that keeps giving. And the media can’t get enough of it.

        The best part is watching jeffsarc’s favorite unbiased fact checkers all covering for the many examples of the lies Waltz has told. Then getting community noted.

        Meanwhile Wiki has gone full gaslight mode covering for all the lies while also allowing changes to remove the military awards JD Vance received, only fixing it after people noticed.

        1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   10 months ago

          You mean the media can’t do enough to provide cover for Walz.

        2. Fire up the Woodchippers! (5-30 Banana Republic Day)   10 months ago

          It’s time to get rid of these democrats. They will never stop.

      2. Gaear Grimsrud   10 months ago

        Dude’s almost as bad as Biden. Can’t wait to hear his story about his uncle being eaten by Korn Pop.

        1. Randy Sax   10 months ago

          KoRn is Nu metal, not pop.

          1. MK Ultra   10 months ago

            Likely the loudest band I’ve ever seen, although some unknown fella named Trent Reznor was close when he opened for Jesus and Mary Chain back in late 80s.

        2. InsaneTrollLogic (Factio Democratica delenda est 5/30/24)   10 months ago

          He’s probably worse. Take note of his use of the National Guard in Minneapolis during the George Floyd riots. They were paintballing anyone on a porch.

      3. Red Rocks White Privilege   10 months ago

        The hilarious part is that he clearly got Bagram mixed up with Balad, which just makes the peacocking even more stupid. It’s like a guy who never got past Guam during the Vietnam war claiming he “served in Thailand at Tan Son Nhut during the Tet Offensive.”

      4. Rick James   10 months ago

        In a Monday post on X (formerly Twitter), commentator Ben Braddock said Walz had written a speech “where he claimed to have ‘stood one night in the dark of night at Bagram Air Base in Iraq’ and watched an American soldier’s body get loaded onto a plane.

        He misspoke. He stood outside on a dark night in Cleveland, while thinking about Bagram Air Base.

    2. Medulla Oblongata   10 months ago

      On October 7, the very same day that Israel was attacked, Zaman shared a post to his Facebook page from the Muslim American Society. “MAS STANDS IN SOLIDARITY WITH PALESTINIANS AGAINST ISRAELI ATTACKS,” the post claimed, before ranting against “Israeli occupation” and “inhumane blockade of Gaza.” The post made no mention of the 1,200 Israelis killed by Hamas terrorists, or of the torture, rape, and kidnapping that occurred.

      The posting has since been removed or made private.

      The report also mentions Zaman using his Facebook to share a Hamas press release in 2016, as well as an anti-Israeli blog post from 2014 on “Israeli Atrocities in Palestine, The Real Terrorism in Palestine.”

      In 2015, Zaman shared a link to a pro-Hitler film “The Greatest Story Never Told,” which is described as a “propaganda movie… released in 2013 and is a favorite among antisemites and QAnon conspiracy influencers, according to the Anti-Defamation League.”

      [TOwnhall.com]

  8. Ra's al Gore   10 months ago

    FREE TO ROAM Rochdale grooming gang ringleader STILL living in city where he abused kids – 9 years after losing right to remain in UK
    https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/25445475/rochdale-grooming-gang-ringleader-still-in-uk/

    1. Ra's al Gore   10 months ago

      https://portal.research.lu.se/en/activities/rape-study-reported-preliminary-investigation-has-started
      Rape study reported – preliminary investigation has started
      Khoshnood, A. (Participant)
      Emergency medicine
      Activity: Other › Media participation

      Description
      In a study of what characterizes a rapist, the research team found that the majority of those convicted were first- or second-generation immigrants. Now the study has led to a prosecutor initiating a preliminary investigation against Kristina Sundquist, one of Lund University’s most cited researchers.
      Period 2021 Oct 28
      Held at Kvällsposten, Sweden
      Degree of Recognition National

      1. JesseAz (5-30 Banana Republic Day)   10 months ago

        Jeff is going to ask you if the victim was drunk or excuse it as cultural differences.

        1. HorseConch   10 months ago

          How many of the “rapists” were actually just beating off on a drunk minor?

          1. InsaneTrollLogic (Factio Democratica delenda est 5/30/24)   10 months ago

            I’ll bet Jeffy could tell us.

    2. Ra's al Gore   10 months ago

      Muslim abuser who ‘didn’t know’ that sex with a girl of 13 was illegal is spared jail
      Adil Rashid admitted travelling to Nottingham and having sex with the girl
      He met the 13-year-old on Facebook and they communicated by texts and phone for two months before they met
      He was educated in a madrassa and ‘had little experience of women’
      Said he had been taught ‘women are no more worthy than a lollipop that has been dropped on the ground’
      Added he was reluctant to have sex but that he was ‘tempted by [the girl]’
      https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2268395/Adil-Rashid-Paedophile-claimed-Muslim-upbringing-meant-didnt-know-illegal-sex-girl-13.html

    3. Ra's al Gore   10 months ago

      Islamic teacher who molested girl, 11, escapes jail as wife ‘doesn’t speak English’
      https://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/465538/Islamic-teacher-who-molested-girl-11-escapes-jail-as-wife-doesn-t-speak-English

      1. Spiritus Mundi   10 months ago

        They had to let him go, the jail was already full. Filled by racist parent who complained their 11 year old daughters were being raped by immigrants.

        1. Michael Ejercito   10 months ago

          So this sort of thing does not only happen in the Catholic Church?

    4. Ra's al Gore   10 months ago

      To the W era warmongers that said we needed to save Iraq from Saddam – fuck you.

      To the woke idiots who want to bring this over here, fuck you too.

      Iraq law proposing legal marriage age of girls to 9 years would ‘legalise child …….’
      https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/world/middle-east/iraq-law-proposing-legal-marriage-age-of-girls-to-9-years-would-legalise-child-/articleshow/112412749.cms

      1. Mother's Lament   10 months ago

        “Allau Akbar”, says Shrike, while not being particularly interested in the marriage part.

        1. Red Rocks White Privilege   10 months ago

          Don’t mention nine-year-olds and sex, mtrueman will start to get excited.

          1. Mother's Lament   10 months ago

            “Innocent merriment”

            mtrueman 2 days ago
            Flag Comment Mute User
            And where would you prefer 9 year olds to learn about sex? Are there any porn sites on the web you could point to that you think would do a better, more responsible job? I’m pretty sure most 9 year olds masturbate. It’s easy to do and is a source of innocent merriment.

            https://reason.com/2023/07/22/sex-workers-want-rights-not-rescue/?comments=true#comment-10166026

            1. Commenter_XY   10 months ago

              misconstrueman is a truly sick, and vile individual

              1. Fire up the Woodchippers! (5-30 Banana Republic Day)   10 months ago

                As are most, if not all our leftist trolls here. I’ve never understood why we allow them to remain here in America, or even exist.

            2. Red Rocks White Privilege   10 months ago

              Yeah, a few days ago he said that children are “sexualized from birth” and made the same comment about nine-year-olds masturbating. He sure is awfully specific about that age group jerking off. Almost like he’s telling on himself about his fetishes.

              1. Fire up the Woodchippers! (5-30 Banana Republic Day)   10 months ago

                So he’s ANOTHER pedo among our leftist commenters. Thats at least three now.

        2. JesseAz (5-30 Banana Republic Day)   10 months ago

          Be careful. You can get 18 months in Jail for using his name.

          https://www.zerohedge.com/political/61-year-old-brit-gets-18-month-prison-sentence-chanting-who-fk-allah

          1. Mother's Lament   10 months ago

            In the UK, you can get arrested for being visibly Jewish near Muslims.

            Not protesting, not taunting, just walking by while looking like a Jew.

            And not Hasidim or anything like that, just a business suit and a kippah.

            1. Rev Arthur L kuckland (5-30-24 banana republic day)   10 months ago

              Nobody expects the English inquisition

            2. Chuck P. (The Artist formerly known as CTSP)   10 months ago

              Another officer “Because your presence is antagonizing them”

              The police felt obligated to tell the Jew to leave. Zero difference between this and a fucking Klan rally in Mississippi circa 1960.

              REGRESSION IS PROGRESSION
              FREEDOM IS SLAVERY
              WAR IS PEACE

              1. Mother's Lament   10 months ago

                And it’s not like he’s dressed to bait in a shtreimel and a tallit or anything. He’s in a nice blazer and suit with a collar. No beard or curly sidelocks.

                The fact that people can’t see the parallels to the early 30’s right now, just because the new Nazis are calling themselves antiracist and the ‘good guys’, is baffling to me.

                1. Fire up the Woodchippers! (5-30 Banana Republic Day)   10 months ago

                  The left are intrinsically bigoted and oppressive.

            3. Fire up the Woodchippers! (5-30 Banana Republic Day)   10 months ago

              The British people should overthrow their government and execute their Marxists. Then they can round up and remove all their Muslim migrants.

      2. damikesc   10 months ago

        Well, it DOES fit their religion.

        Doesn’t speak well of said faith, however.

        1. Medulla Oblongata   10 months ago

          They learned it from their master:

          Aisha bint Abi Bakr[a] (c. 613/614 – July 678) was Islamic prophet Muhammad’s third and youngest wife.[8][9]

          Little is known about her childhood. A preponderance of classical sources converge on Aisha being 6 or 7 years old at the time of her marriage, and 9 at the consummation; her age has been a source of ideological friction.

      3. Mike Parsons   10 months ago

        “To the woke idiots who want to bring this over here, fuck you too.”

        They are already using the argument of “who are you to stop a consenting parent and child from mutilating their genitals if the parent and child agree its what they want…MYOB”

        Why on earth would that not cover fucking children who “consent” to it. Its the door they have opened.

        1. Red Rocks White Privilege   10 months ago

          The gay rights movement ultimately started to gain ground when they kicked the NAMBLA types and pedophiles out of the activist and public relations side after the AIDS crisis kicked off. Before then, pedos were a fairly prominent and loud leg of the movement; even George Takei has admitted that he was groomed as a teenager by an older man.

          It’s not really an accident that the left has been trying to normalize pedophilia since the 21st century started. It’s been a marker of queer theorists like Gayle Rubin going back several decades now, and it’s always been a particular fetish of “sexologists,” but after wokism started mainstreaming post-9/11, they’ve been worming their way back in to prominence and repeatedly putting out trial balloons to test social acceptance.

          1. Commenter_XY   10 months ago

            It will never be normalized.

          2. sparkstable   10 months ago

            Don’t forget the Fench intellectuals who signed off on pro-pedo positions.

            Simone de Beauvoir groomed her students and brought them into the bedroom of her and Jean-Paul Sartre.

        2. Medulla Oblongata   10 months ago

          chemjeff radical individualist 1 month ago
          Flag Comment
          Mute User
          If a parent claims that their 6 year-old child has body dysmorphia and needs to have an arm amputated, and some doctor agrees, is that something we’re going to unquestioningly support of something we’re going to try to prevent.

          I don’t think “we” should be actively supporting or “we” should be actively preventing anything. I think that “we” should instead make sure that:
          – the child has a proper diagnosis, perhaps evaluated by a few doctors
          – the proposed standard of care meets some rigorous medically sound standard
          – all parties are very clearly informed and all very clearly consent

          And then let the parents make the decision that they think is in the child’s best interests.

          Now if *you* want to give your unsolicited advice to the parents, you are free to do so. If you want to propose your own alternative treatments, including the option of no treatment at all, you are free to do so.

          Incidentally, I think this is exactly how it should work whenever parents are faced with a tough and difficult decision regarding their children. “We” should butt out and let the family have space to deal with their situation in their own way.

          1. R Mac   10 months ago

            Lying Jeffy is evil.

            1. Mother's Lament   10 months ago

              He really is. It sound’s like hyperbole but it isn’t. There’s a real darkness in the things he pushes.

          2. Bertram Guilfoyle   10 months ago

            Jeff’s comments and support of bizarre shit like this are a big reason why I don’t support the “L” party, and don’t vote for their candidates (it’s not “because their gayyyy”).

            This is why I’m a small “l” libertarian at most.

          3. chemjeff radical individualist   10 months ago

            So I suppose the more libertarian answer is for Ron DeSantis or Trump or Biden or Kamalamadingdong to be deciding on ‘appropriate’ medical treatment for every child in the nation. Right?

            You’re just as bad as Team Blue in wanting a government takeover of healthcare. It’s just that your team’s version of a ‘takeover’ is moral, not financial.

            Team Blue: I want government-run health care! Health care should be ‘free’ for everyone!
            Team Red: I want government-run health care! You may only get the medical procedures that the state deems that you should have!

            1. Bertram Guilfoyle   10 months ago

              “Right?”

              No.

            2. Red Rocks White Privilege   10 months ago

              Team chemjeff: “Cut off that kid’s genitals and permanently destroy their physiology with puberty blockers!”

              1. Chuck P. (The Artist formerly known as CTSP)   10 months ago

                Jeff thinks the WPATH files are something made up by conspiracy theorists even though the email chains are thoroughly documented and the source materials made available.

                1. Mother's Lament   10 months ago

                  He knows that what he’s saying isn’t true. He’s called Lying Jeffy by everyone here for real, concrete reasons.

                  1. Fire up the Woodchippers! (5-30 Banana Republic Day)   10 months ago

                    Very true. He needs to go.

            3. Mike Parsons   10 months ago

              “I think that “we” should instead make sure that:
              – the child has a proper diagnosis, perhaps evaluated by a few doctors
              – the proposed standard of care meets some rigorous medically sound standard”

              What if its plainly obvious that the major organizations are cooked, they are taking advice from a small number of hyper activist types that are skewing their data, and their “expert advice meeting a high medical standard” doesn’t pass a very basic smell test for rationality.

              What if the child believes they can fly, so do the parents, and they in conjunction with their pediatric aeronautics specialist all consent to throwing the child off the roof. How high do the bodies get before someone stops the abuse.

            4. Bertram Guilfoyle   10 months ago

              Government exists to protect people’s rights. This includes protecting children from quack doctors and nit-wit parents.

            5. R Mac   10 months ago

              Lying Jeffy’s just laying the groundwork for being able to fuck kids, the sick fuck.

            6. Fire up the Woodchippers! (5-30 Banana Republic Day)   10 months ago

              What a bullshit sophist argument. You really should commit suicide.

        3. Fire up the Woodchippers! (5-30 Banana Republic Day)   10 months ago

          Pedo Jeffy certainly supports mutilating children. Is there a logical reason creatures like him are allowed to exist?

      4. Medulla Oblongata   10 months ago

        Just prior to the vote to authorize military force, Biden gave a lengthy speech from the floor of the Senate and explained why he would vote for the resolution (beginning on S10290).

        Biden said he viewed the resolution not as a “rush to war,” as some of his Democratic colleagues alleged, but rather a “march to peace and security.”

        “I believe passage of this, with strong support, is very likely to enhance the prospects that the secretary of state will get a strong resolution out of the [United Nations] Security Council,” Biden said.

        Biden added that the resolution would increase the probability the U.N. would get inspectors into Iraq to do meaningful investigations of its weapons program.

        “I will vote for this because we should be compelling Iraq to make good on its obligations to the United Nations,” Biden said. “Because while Iraq’s illegal weapons of mass destruction program do not — do not — pose an imminent threat to our national security, in my view, they will, if left unfettered. And because a strong vote in Congress, as I said, increases the prospect for a tough, new U.N. resolution on weapons of mass destruction, it is likely to get weapons inspectors in, which, in turn, decreases the prospects of war, in my view.”

        Biden seized on this statement in Bush’s address to the nation: “Approving this resolution does not mean that military action is imminent or unavoidable.”

        Biden praised Bush for choosing, up to that point, “a course of moderation and deliberation” and noted that Bush promised that any military action would be “with allies at our side.” Biden said the resolution emphasized “the importance of international support, manifested through the United Nations Security Council.”

        Though Biden pushed forcefully for a wider international response, he was not opposed to military action, if necessary.

        “Ultimately, either those weapons must be dislodged from Iraq, or Saddam must be dislodged from power,” Biden said.

        [https://www.factcheck.org/2019/09/bidens-record-on-iraq-war/]

    5. JesseAz (5-30 Banana Republic Day)   10 months ago

      Same thing happening here. Even criminal illegal aliens allowed to stay despite crimes and subsequent deportation orders.

  9. Fist of Etiquette   10 months ago

    His work represents the newer of two strategies that New York’s city and state governments are using to dispel the atmosphere of disorder and danger that permeates the subways.

    Makes it sound as though the MTA is working to dispel the atmosphere in lieu of actually removing the disorder and danger.

    1. Mickey Rat   10 months ago

      Removing the disorder and danger might look mean spirited. After all, the people causing the disorder and danger are the Democrats base voters.

      1. JesseAz (5-30 Banana Republic Day)   10 months ago

        Disorder and danger is fine to use against citizens and taxpayers, just not the government or illegal aliens.

  10. Fist of Etiquette   10 months ago

    Antitrust regulators set their sights on the stupidest possible target: Breaking up Google.

    The end result will be Google changing chat apps again to something even less functional, if that’s even possible.

  11. Mother's Lament   10 months ago

    That Colbert one was hilarious. Even the audience full of pet sheep thought they were joking.

    1. Gaear Grimsrud   10 months ago

      Haven’t watched Colbert since he went batshit crazy. Surprised to see his audience isn’t quite as stupid as he is.

      1. A Thinking Mind   10 months ago

        He was always batshit crazy, he just used to exist in a format that compartmentalized him.

        1. Fire up the Woodchippers! (5-30 Banana Republic Day)   10 months ago

          I would like to do a bit where he’s subjected to authentic torture in front of a live studio audience. Complete with applause signs. Hilarity would ensure.

      2. Red Rocks White Privilege   10 months ago

        One of the funnier moments on his show since he went full DNC hack was when he announced that Comey had been fired, then scolded the audience as Russian operatives after they started cheering (because they blamed Comey for submarining Hillary’s presidential run).

    2. damikesc   10 months ago

      The only comedy Colbert can pull off is the unintentional variety.

      1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   10 months ago

        Self-immolation on camera would be kinda funny.

        1. Fire up the Woodchippers! (5-30 Banana Republic Day)   10 months ago

          I would pay good money to beat and torture him.

    3. mad.casual   10 months ago

      IMO, the best part about it is that it’s not clear if the actors actually have no concept of “never interrupt your enemy when he’s committing a mistake” or if they do and, as microcosm, they’re just stuck with the mistakes they’re stuck with and the roles they have to play.

      “They lie to us, we know they’re lying, they know we know they’re lying, but they keep lying to us, and we keep laughing at their own audience laughing at them.”

  12. Fist of Etiquette   10 months ago

    There is no good reason for exempting tips. A worker at McDonald’s making $15/hour in wages vs a worker at a sit-down restaurant making $15/hour (wages + tips) should be treated exactly the same for tax purposes

    Yes, the United States Tax Code is all about treating people equally.

    1. Randy Sax   10 months ago

      There is no good reason for exempting tips…
      …should be treated exactly the same for tax purposes

      They’re harder to track. To the point where you spend 8 billion dollars on new IRS agents to track them down. Juice isn’t worth the squeeze.

      1. Fire up the Woodchippers! (5-30 Banana Republic Day)   10 months ago

        Its less about the money than it is further empowering the IRS as a weapon to be used against wrongthink.

    2. Overt   10 months ago

      But just for the record, they ARE different, and if you are going to be a bitch about the Tax Code, then be accurate.

      A person getting a paycheck from McDonalds is earning an hourly wage from an employer as a condition of their employment. If you refuse to pay your employee who is earning $15 an hour, you are breaking a contract and could face legal and civil penalties.

      A person getting a tip is getting a GIFT from a 3rd party. It was not a “condition of employment” or even a “condition of serving”. If you don’t tip, people will think you are an asshole, but no one will arrest you for theft or take you to court.

      Sure, they are alike in that they are all income, but then, I don’t see these same people arguing that Capital Gains is the same as a person working at McDonalds.

      1. Kyle T   10 months ago

        Since it’s tax free can we make it 10% instead of 15%, or none at all. Make the owners pay a “living wage” and skip the tip – like most of the world.

        1. Randy Sax   10 months ago

          Theoretical:

          Tipping system
          $10 burger + $2 Tax free tip. You paid $12, worker gets $2

          No-tipping
          Burger now costs $13, You paid $13, worker gets $2, Uncle Sam take $1.

          Which system do you prefer?

          1. Medulla Oblongata   10 months ago

            I’d prefer a much better tax system, but I also prefer that, since I have to pay my taxes, that everyone else pays theirs too, and not commit tax fraud.

            1. Randy Sax   10 months ago

              In the above example, the only person getting taxed more is you. If you want to keep profit the same and worker take home the same, the tax has to be built in to the price and ultimately comes from the customer.

            2. mad.casual   10 months ago

              You aren’t Captain Kirk and this isn’t the Kobayashi Maru. You’re effectively arguing for more taxes as long as you feel they’re appropriately equitable.

              Fuck you. Cut spending.

      2. Medulla Oblongata   10 months ago

        It’s not a gift because there was service provided.

        If you walked into a restaurant and handed servers money and left without using their service, then it would be a gift.

        Taxes are theft and all that, but stop pretending that tips are magical and not at all income that is supposed to be taxed in our income tax system or that servers are special and “deserve”
        tax-free income. Garbage men and sewer plant workers have shitty jobs too.

        People who do not report and pay taxes on tips (and under-the-table cash payments for contractor work, etc.,) are 100% tax cheats.

        1. Overt   10 months ago

          By your logic, just because my son mows my lawn for me, I can’t also give him a gift. The person was willing to perform the service whether I tipped them or not. Therefore, the fact that I added an additional gratuity (thank you) means it isn’t the same as wages. No court would say that I owe this person a tip in return for the service they provided me, therefore it isn’t a wage.

        2. sparkstable   10 months ago

          The service they provide was to the company, not me.

          That service was to facilitate the company serving me. I was served by the firm.

          The firm was serviced by the employee.

        3. mad.casual   10 months ago

          It’s not a gift because there was service provided.

          Prove it you authoritarian fuckstick.

          A while back Mrs. Casual placed a Thanksgiving take out catering order at a local restaurant. I walk into the place and, despite the bar being packed, the bartender, not the concierge, is handling the takeout orders. They take my order off the shelf and set it on the counter. I start taking my money out and they hand me the receipt saying it was pre-paid. I toss a $20 on the bar because it’s Thanksgiving they could’ve been serving other people drinks.

          So, no contract, and you’re asserting that I employed them for less than 5 min. at more than $240/hr.? You’re as retarded, and useful, as the “We need a $50/hr. minimum wage!” idiots.

          Closure to the story, I get home, part of the order is missing. I phone up the restaurant and they tell me they’re aware and that it’s already on its way. The same bartender shows up at the door, profusely apologetic for having let me walk out without part of my order. I ask if he needs a delivery fee. He says the tip I already gave him would’ve more than covered it if we’d had the whole thing delivered. I said, it’s Thanksgiving and him making the trip is a big save. He says to have a Happy Holiday.

          So, you authoritarian fuckhat, how do we report that completely congenial interaction to the Revenue Men? Oh, wait. I don’t care. Go fuck yourself.

      3. Medulla Oblongata   10 months ago

        https://www.irs.gov/irb/2008-04_IRB
        DISCUSSION
        Frivolous Positions. Positions that are the same as or similar to the following are frivolous.

        (4) Wages, tips, and other compensation received for the performance of personal services are not taxable income or are offset by an equivalent deduction for the personal services rendered, including an argument that a taxpayer has a “claim of right” to exclude the cost or value of the taxpayer’s labor from income or that taxpayers have a basis in their labor equal to the fair market value of the wages they receive, or similar arguments described as frivolous in Rev. Rul. 2004-29, 2004-1 C.B. 627, or Rev. Rul. 2007-19, 2007-14 I.R.B. 843.

        26 U.S. Code § 61 – Gross income defined
        (a)General definition
        Except as otherwise provided in this subtitle, gross income means all income from whatever source derived, including (but not limited to) the following items:
        (1)Compensation for services, including fees, commissions, fringe benefits, and similar items;

        1. Overt   10 months ago

          I am not arguing that gratuity isn’t considered a wage according to the fucking law, silly. The whole reason we are discussing this is that some people want to change the law because tips are in fact different from wages. And people who say they are just the same as wages are wrong. They are not. Tips are not guaranteed. Wages are.

          1. Medulla Oblongata   10 months ago

            And I’m saying that people who are currently advocating for people to not report their tips because they say they are gifts are promoting tax fraud based on the current law. Change the law, sure, let’s do that, but until that’s done, any argument about tips/gifts vs wages will be moot. But people who are here today saying “I never reported my tips or paid taxes on them” yeah, they’re tax evaders.

            1. Chuck P. (The Artist formerly known as CTSP)   10 months ago

              yeah, they’re tax evaders.

              Good for them. Whereover I can evade tax with little risk, I do so as well. It is the little things that keep me from going down and renting a really big woodchipper.

              1. mad.casual   10 months ago

                Between Overt and Randy Sax above, he’s really veering hard into sarcasmic/sea lion/”I’m just trying to have a conversation.”/salutary contradiction territory.

    3. Earth-based Human Skeptic   10 months ago

      To hell with people, how does the tax code reap votes?

      1. Chuck P. (The Artist formerly known as CTSP)   10 months ago

        Are you kidding? EITC, FTW.

  13. Ra's al Gore   10 months ago

    ‘Peaceful’ BLM protests – we have to protect the right to protest.
    This? Arrest anyone even nearby to stop the protests.

    You will be refused bail even if you only watched riots from the sidelines, judge warns
    https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2024/08/09/judge-refuses-bail-riot-bystanders-belfast/

    1. Ra's al Gore   10 months ago

      You know who else should be on trial for the UK’s far-right riots? Elon Musk
      Jonathan Freedland
      https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/article/2024/aug/09/uk-far-right-riots-elon-musk-x

      1. Gaear Grimsrud   10 months ago

        Would president Harris extradite a (South) African American to stand trial in the UK? Probably.

      2. Mother's Lament   10 months ago

        Straight out authoritarianism.

        Even the Nazis and the Soviets weren’t so blatant in their public calls for censorship. What we’re seeing now is closest to Cultural Revolution Maoism.

        Hope they don’t go Khmer Rouge next.

        1. Michael Ejercito   10 months ago

          It all boils down to this.

          Musk allows Badthink®™, and because some people in the UK rioted in reaction to this Badthink®™, Musk is guilty of these riots.

          So does this logic apply to Patrice Cullors, Nikole Hannah-Jones, and Charles M. Blow. they promoted the “Hands Up, Don’t Shoot” lie, and some people rioted on this basis.

          Furthermore, jack Dorsey allowed this message to spread on Twitter. Is he criminally guilty of causing these riots?

          The same people who want Musk arrested for the riots in the UK also feel that “Hands Up, Don’t Shoot” was Goodthink®™, and that those who burnt down buildings and attacked people because of this were not rioting, but fighting White Supremacy®™.

          1. Medulla Oblongata   10 months ago

            It seems that in the eyes of the new elite, some riots are okay, maybe even good, while others are vile acts of fascist lunacy. Angry African-Americans and their white ‘allies’ among the Ivy League left getting violent over the killing of a black man? Good. We bow down. Immigrant communities in Leeds setting fires in response to social workers coming for Roma kids? Fine. The language of the unheard. White working-class men kicking off in the aftermath of the murder of three girls? Evil. Unconscionable. Crush them.

            https://www.spiked-online.com/2024/08/03/after-southport-the-rage-against-the-throng/

    2. Red Rocks White Privilege   10 months ago

      And just as a reminder, the center-right cheered the trucker protest in Canada getting stomped down, and are currently MIA on the protests in the UK undergoing the same suppression.

      They’re also now running cover for Tim Walz acting like he was taking fire on the front lines of GWOT, as if the fact he was really mostly a chair moistener during his time in Guard, and the closest he ever got to the desert was after he entered Congress on fact-finding trips, makes him some kind of Billy Badass just because he enlisted. It’s a great example of how they fully swallow the left’s framing of every single issue, rather than acknowledge that the reason he’s getting so much shit is because he lied about his combat record.

      No one dogs Dems Tammy Duckworth or Jason Crow for their military record, because they were actually in combat. Walz built his credibility as a True and Honest Folksy Guy on such claims.

  14. Fist of Etiquette   10 months ago

    A colossal jump in home prices benefited owners, whether they scraped together a down payment in the early 2010s or squeaked in just before the recent leap in prices and rates.

    Gen Z now gets to rail against the economic opportunity disparities with its immediate predecessor.

    1. JesseAz (5-30 Banana Republic Day)   10 months ago

      I’m honestly not sure what the benefit of unrealized gains are until realized. Sure many of these people are taking equity loans out at 10%, removing the equity.

      1. HorseConch   10 months ago

        Higher taxes and insurance premiums? Those sound like fantastic things for homeowners.

        1. JesseAz (5-30 Banana Republic Day)   10 months ago

          Good point. Forgot the government benefits.

          1. Don't look at me!   10 months ago

            Plus, real estate agents juicy commissions.

            1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   10 months ago

              Hey, they just pretended to fix that.

  15. Ra's al Gore   10 months ago

    The “mind your own business” crowd:

    Ask Damon: Should I get my anti-vax friends’ baby vaccinated without telling them?
    https://www.washingtonpost.com/advice/2022/09/23/ask-damon-antivax-friends-baby/

    1. JesseAz (5-30 Banana Republic Day)   10 months ago

      Yes. – Jeff and JFree

    2. Don't look at me!   10 months ago

      Should I get my anti-vax friends’ baby vaccinated without telling them?

      Do you have a death wish?

    3. Randy Sax   10 months ago

      I was tempted to suggest that you attempt to sway them into getting vaccinated, but if an active pandemic that has killed millions of people — plus all of the social restrictions of being unvaccinated — hasn’t convinced them yet, I’m not sure what else would. Maybe an ultimatum, where you tell them you don’t feel safe around them anymore. You’d risk ending that relationship, sure.

      Why would you not feel safe around them if you are vaxed?

      1. DesigNate   10 months ago

        Because they know the truth, even if they’ll never admit it: the shot doesn’t work as the Science said it would. Not even like the vaccines that came before it.

      2. Red Rocks White Privilege   10 months ago

        Maybe an ultimatum, where you tell them you don’t feel safe around them anymore. You’d risk ending that relationship, sure.

        Well, duh, if you’re talking about getting my kid a medical procedure without my consent, you’re not just risking an “end to the relationship,” you’re risking your head being stamped into paste.

        Does this idiot not realize that shit is illegal? (Well, at least in red states where Branch Covidianism isn’t a feature of today’s marxist theology)

    4. Zeb   10 months ago

      What the fuck is wrong with people? There is no proven benefit to anyone from vaccinating children. They didn’t even test for efficacy in children as far as I know because children have such extremely low risk.

      1. A Thinking Mind   10 months ago

        Depends on if we’re talking about more standard scheduled vaccines like MMR, Hep-B, and Polio, versus experimental vaccines for diseases that are seemingly harmless to children, like COVID-19.

        I can’t read the article so it’s possible they mean “anti-vax” as in the old definition, versus anti-vax in the sense of people who don’t think COVID is worth getting a shot over.

        1. Zeb   10 months ago

          You are right, I assumed it was about covid vaccine (which no one should give to an infant). I’m all for the well tested ones that actually for diseases that actually affect children.

          1. Michael Ejercito   10 months ago

            I can excuse certain vax mandates for in-person public school attendance, as you have hundreds of the same people coming into close contact with each other five days in a row out of the week.

            Again, this is a specified sub-environment with a much greater than average risk for disease transmission.

            1. mad.casual   10 months ago

              I can excuse certain vax mandates for in-person public school attendance, as you have hundreds of the same people coming into close contact with each other five days in a row out of the week.

              IMO, this isn’t a mandate. Pulling a gun and telling someone to give you their wallet is a mandate, even if you give them something in return. Asking someone to show you up front that they’ve got the money before you give them the goods is a prerequisite but it’s not mandatory. Presumably, they’re free to back out of the deal.

              Moreover, traditionally, there was pretty wide latitude with respect to this anyway. “Herd immunity” should be achieved well below 100% for pretty much any of these diseases and if polio, HepB, or even measles is ripping through your student population, you’ve failed humanity well outside of any distinctions between requirements and mandates.

      2. Red Rocks White Privilege   10 months ago

        Even leaving the question of COVID vaccines aside, performing medical treatments on children without the consent of their parents is against the law, as is forging their signature for such consent. They have you sign all those forms specifically to cover their ass in a potential legal dispute, and why they use emotional manipulation on parents whose kid thinks they’re “born in the wrong body” that they will kill themselves if they don’t permanently fuck up their physiology.

        1. Zeb   10 months ago

          Oh, absolutely that too. I couldn’t read the paywalled article, but I sure hope the advice columnist made it clear that getting someone else’s kid vaxed without permission would be very illegal.

    5. A Thinking Mind   10 months ago

      Holy fucking shit.

    6. Mike Parsons   10 months ago

      The fact that this even came across someone’s mind is evidence enough that the brain rot is too much on the left.

      And that’s aside from the fact that the act itself is a death wish.

    7. Earth-based Human Skeptic   10 months ago

      Next question: Should I get my pro-life friend’s baby aborted without telling them?

    8. Medulla Oblongata   10 months ago

      I’d have a kidnapping and assault&battery charge filed against you in the first 5 minutes after I find out about it.

    9. mad.casual   10 months ago

      Well, we found the American who would jerk off to a 15 yr. old rape victim, express remorse, and then get confused as to why all the people calling for him to be locked in a small concrete box aren’t being charged with hate crimes.

  16. Ra's al Gore   10 months ago

    I’m reporting everyone who denied Biden was senile.

    Secretary Of State Asks Michiganders To Report Their Neighbors For Election ‘Misinformation’
    https://thefederalist.com/2024/08/02/secretary-of-state-asks-michiganders-to-report-their-neighbors-for-election-misinformation/

    1. Ra's al Gore   10 months ago

      Maybe if I report the dead for spreading misinformation
      Michigan still has more than 25K dead people on the voter rolls, lawsuit claims
      https://www.foxnews.com/politics/michigan-still-has-more-than-25k-dead-people-on-the-voter-rolls-lawsuit-claims

      1. JesseAz (5-30 Banana Republic Day)   10 months ago

        First you demand voters ID and now you demand proof of life? What type of Nazi are you?

    2. Jerry B.   10 months ago

      Senile? SENILE?

      https://babylonbee.com/news/insane-conspiracy-theorist-thinks-biden-still-alive

    3. CE   10 months ago

      Start with Harris and Walz.

  17. Ra's al Gore   10 months ago

    Meet the Little-Known Activist Group That Has Tens of Thousands of Doctors Registering Patients To Vote
    From psychiatric hospitals to the NICU, clinical settings have become political battlegrounds.
    https://freebeacon.com/elections/meet-the-little-known-activist-group-that-has-tens-of-thousands-of-doctors-registering-patients-to-vote/

    Many patients at the Pennsylvania Psychiatric Institute, an 89-bed facility affiliated with Pennsylvania State University, suffer from schizophrenia, substance abuse, depression, or bipolar disorder. They cannot complete the “activities of daily living,” the hospital’s inpatient clinic states. Some are “suicidal, aggressive, or dangerous to themselves or others.”

    During their stay, which is often involuntary, patients participate in group counseling, learn strategies for stress management, have their medication adjusted, and interact with therapy animals.

    They can also partake in a less orthodox therapeutic activity: registering to vote.

    Located in a swing state that could decide the 2024 election, the hospital asks psychiatric inpatients, regardless of diagnosis, if they would be interested in “voter registration tools” that let them check their nearest polling station and register to vote online. Patients can also request a mail-in ballot with “assistance” from hospital staff, according to a pair of papers about the project, which began in 2020….

    1. Ra's al Gore   10 months ago

      White liberals more likely to have a mental health condition
      https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2021/apr/22/white-liberals-more-likely-have-mental-health-cond/

      Sixty-two percent of Whites who classify themselves as “very liberal” or “liberal” have been told by a doctor they have a mental health condition, as compared to 26% of conservatives and 20% of moderates, the study found.

      Young White people who identified as “very liberal” were almost one and a half times more likely to report mental health problems than those who considered themselves “liberal.”

      1. Mike Parsons   10 months ago

        “White liberals more likely to have a mental health condition”

        Who would have known from a brief look at their TikToks and instagrams…

        1. Red Rocks White Privilege   10 months ago

          A lot of them even helpfully list all of their mental illnesses in their social media profiles.

          1. Medulla Oblongata   10 months ago

            If it’s a spectrum…isn’t everyone “on the spectrum”?

            Also, “Maybe she’s on the spectrum” is now a common retort to defend or excuse any sort of bad behavior.

            1. Jefferson Paul   10 months ago

              Unless they are talking about Elon Musk. Then he’s just a “far right zealot.”

        2. Medulla Oblongata   10 months ago

          May 1, 2023
          Young Democrats are abnormally nervous, depressed, bisexual, and eager to defund the police, according to a new poll from the Harvard Kennedy School of Politics.

          The poll asked respondents between the ages of 18 and 29 how often they had experienced a certain emotion or problem over the past two weeks, and the results among Democrats were rather shocking. Here’s how young Democrats reported feeling “at least several days” over that period:

          • 61 percent reported feeling “nervous, anxious, or on edge”

          • 57 percent said they had “trouble relaxing”

          • 55 percent said they felt “unsafe”

          • 52 percent reported feeling “down, depressed, or hopeless”

          • 49 percent said they felt “little interest or pleasure in doing things”

          • 47 percent said they experienced “loneliness”

          • 46 percent reported “feeling afraid as if something awful might happen”

          • 27 percent said they had entertained “thoughts that [they] would be better off dead” or “thoughts of hurting [themselves] in some way”

          That doesn’t seem very healthy. And in case you were wondering: Yes, those numbers were significantly smaller among young Republicans. Despite feeling nervous and unsafe all the time, nearly 4 in 10 young Democrats said they support “defunding police departments” in their communities. Nearly one in three said police officers make them feel “less safe.”

          https://freebeacon.com/democrats/theres-something-wrong-with-young-democrats-poll

      2. A Thinking Mind   10 months ago

        If you really want to, you can find a doctor who will diagnose you with a mental health condition. It’s a rather damning referendum on the mental health industry. Conservatives and independents are less likely to seek out a mental health professional.

        1. Red Rocks White Privilege   10 months ago

          Mainly because it’s an easy way to claim you have a “disability” and get gibs. It’s become a lot more prominent as leftists have come to dominate the psychology industry, and are willing to indulge anyone who wants to sponge money from the government.

        2. Zeb   10 months ago

          I suspect that a lot of it is about who seeks treatment. Makes sense that lefties would seek out an authority figure who will tell them that their problems aren’t their fault.

      3. Longtobefree   10 months ago

        If being ‘liberal’ means thinking like a democrat, it IS a mental health condition.

    2. JesseAz (5-30 Banana Republic Day)   10 months ago

      They’ll fix this after the nursing home scandals of workers voting as patients who are comatose or have legal guardians.

    3. Gaear Grimsrud   10 months ago

      Don’t know about PA but ballot harvesting is completely legal in Illinois thanks to the Democrats.

    4. CE   10 months ago

      Those backup boxes of Harris/Walz ballots aren’t going to fill themselves out.

  18. Fist of Etiquette   10 months ago

    What it’s like to swim in the cleaned-up Seine.

    Taking a dip in Europe’s second-worst partially-flushed toilet.

    1. mad.casual   10 months ago

      Taking a dip in Europe’s second-worst partially-flushed toilet.

      The first being Brussels?

      1. Fist of Etiquette   10 months ago

        Filthadelphia. If it’s a list of the worst anything, they will always top it.

  19. Quo Usque Tandem   10 months ago

    “Spokespeople for brands such as CNN, USA Today and NPR, whose links appeared in Harris for President ads, said they were unaware their brand was being featured this way,” reports Axios.

    And that will be the extent of it; why should these MSM outlets complain as they are already doing everything they can to help her campaign?

  20. Ra's al Gore   10 months ago

    Luck for us voting machines are built by such ethical giants:

    Co-founder of Smartmatic voting machine company charged with paying bribes for Philippine contracts
    https://apnews.com/article/smartmatic-venezuela-election-voting-machines-9a3e334f149f962be9d982bf4a11dc43

    1. Ra's al Gore   10 months ago

      Hackers found vulnerabilities in voting machines — but it’s too late to do anything about it
      https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/hackers-2024-election-voting-machines-b2595812.html

      A group of hackers at a Las Vegas conference identified scores of vulnerabilities in voting equipment, but it’s unlikely fixes will make it to polling places before Election Day in November.

      “There’s so much basic stuff that should be happening and is not happening, so yes I’m worried about things not being fixed, but they haven’t been fixed for a long time, and I’m also angry about it,” Harri Hursti, co-founder of the DEF Con conference’s Voting Village program, told Politico.

  21. Idaho-Bob   10 months ago

    Where’s the Walz “Happy Warrior” compilation?

    1. Ajsloss   10 months ago

      Folksy Happy Warrior

      1. Gaear Grimsrud   10 months ago

        Everybody’s dad is a folksy happy warrior.

        1. Red Rocks White Privilege   10 months ago

          Well, sure, there’s a lot of photos of the Red Guard smiling with “joy,” too.

      2. CE   10 months ago

        Normal Midwestern Dad — leaves people alone, but sets up handy COVID Karen tip line for anyone to easily report their neighbors if those neighbors aren’t acting neighborly.

    2. Social Justice is neither   10 months ago

      That is the video from before his drunk driving mug shot, somehow being suppressed through hush money payments that Bragg is all over.

  22. Fist of Etiquette   10 months ago

    Please stop with the yas kween headlines…

    See? The Harris campaign isn’t responsible for all of them.

    1. Quicktown Brix   10 months ago

      Can anybody translate this for an old guy not on social media? I asked by daughter, but she just said something about skibidi rizz.

      1. DesigNate   10 months ago

        Yas Queen = You have done a particularly good job of expressing or doing something and I vehemently agree with it. Well done ma’am.

        1. Quicktown Brix   10 months ago

          Thank you

  23. Mother's Lament   10 months ago

    This was Minnesota under Tim Walz.

    Never forget.

  24. Mother's Lament   10 months ago

    Tim Walz ordered the Minnesota national guard and local PD to shoot paintballs at residents who dared sit on their porches during Covid lockdowns.

    [video clip]

    1. Social Justice is neither   10 months ago

      And never forget the family love of burning cities.

    2. Idaho-Bob   10 months ago

      At the time this happened, I was more appalled by the police who fired on people on porches rather than the dickhead giving the order.

      1. Stuck in California   10 months ago

        Yeah, no shit.

        Frankly, I’m a bit disappointed that nobody shot back. Not that I want people killed over this stupid shit, but if the police men are willing to pull this kind of shit without realizing how amazingly wrong it is, they should be scared of the response. Very scared.

        But so many people just folded to the tyranny.

  25. Fist of Etiquette   10 months ago

    The laugh line that poor Stephen Colbert didn’t realize was a laugh line!

    When you’ve lost the trained seals.

    1. Bertram Guilfoyle   10 months ago

      They didn’t realize they weren’t supposed to laugh at that one.

  26. Ra's al Gore   10 months ago

    Free speech is bad:

    As an ex-Twitter boss, I have a way to grab Elon Musk’s attention. If he keeps stirring unrest, get an arrest warrant
    https://www.irishexaminer.com/opinion/commentanalysis/arid-41455264.html

    For US-based tech firms, the concept of “free speech” is perceived somewhat differently. In my time working under a significantly more enlightened regime at Twitter, it was quickly clear to the team in London that the notion of “free speech” espoused in San Francisco wasn’t always focused on creating the kind of utopian world you might casually imagine.

    We’d regularly see that there was a dark side to the idea that anyone could say anything; time and time again, it led to a minority group (a subset of straight white males) being able to aggressively target large portions of the rest of society, including women, the LBGTQ+ community and ethnic minorities.

    1. Randy Sax   10 months ago

      creating the kind of utopian world you might casually imagine.

      Pretty sure the goal of free speech isn’t to create a utopia, but to avoid a dystopia.

      1. Chuck P. (The Artist formerly known as CTSP)   10 months ago

        Exactly. Free speech, in and of itself, doesn’t make society better. What it does do is prevent tyrants from hiding how they are making it worse.

    2. Don't look at me!   10 months ago

      Words can be hurtful!

    3. Zeb   10 months ago

      It also allows for everyone else to aggressively target the subset of white males.

      1. Social Justice is neither   10 months ago

        But that is the goodthink that is firmly a part of his utopia.

        1. Zeb   10 months ago

          I’m sure it is. But it’s presented as if it’s one sided, when an open-ish internet allows everyone to gang up on everyone else.

  27. Ra's al Gore   10 months ago

    https://pjmedia.com/lincolnbrown/2024/08/13/the-agencys-goal-is-to-bankrupt-you-make-you-quit-die-kill-yourselves-n4931589

    1. Ra's al Gore   10 months ago

      Weird, I’m not allowed to quote from the article above.

      1. Medulla Oblongata   10 months ago

        Same. I tried looking for the usual kickers, too but not finding what the trigger is. But pasting into this comment on Edit seems to work.

        Journalist Catherine Herridge is no stranger to intimidation or the consequences that can come with trying to tell the truth. Sadly, many of us are likely to become familiar with those things in the years to come. Herridge’s latest report is eye-opening. At the same time, the information she uncovered while talking with Mark Jones, Mike Taylor, and Fred Wynn, three former members of the U.S. Customs and Border Patrol, is going to come as no surprise to anyone who has paid even cursory attention to the news over the last four years.

        When illegal aliens are apprehended and detained, regulations require the CBP to take a DNA swab from the cheek of the detainee and send it to the FBI for processing. All told the entire process can be completed in 72 hours from start to finish. The process can be extremely valuable in identifying criminals who crossed over the border, keeping them from committing crimes in the U.S., or apprehending them when they have broken the law.

        The whistleblowers told Herridge that not only is the DNA collection process often ignored, but people who speak out about it also face severe penalties. The trio told Herridge that they had been sanctioned with reductions in grade, desk duty, and the confiscation of their service weapons. They have lost their law enforcement credentials and their retirements.

        One of them said, “…the agency’s goal is to bankrupt you, make you quit, die, kill yourselves, or basically, preferably, all the above.” Herridge even obtained a memo confirming that whistleblowers in the matter were subject to retaliation. They add that none of them have ever faced any disciplinary action throughout their careers.

  28. Ra's al Gore   10 months ago

    https://weingarten.substack.com/p/the-noncitizen-voting-threat-to-the

    Battlegrounds from Pennsylvania to Virginia to Arizona to North Carolina and beyond report that thousands of noncitizens have been discovered on voter rolls in the past decade, with unknown numbers already having voted.

    Republicans argue that such examples expose weaknesses in the voter registration process – including that registrants need not provide proof of citizenship.

    Critic: there is “almost nothing” the public or political parties can do after an election to identify and invalidate noncitizen votes prior to election certification

    1. Ra's al Gore   10 months ago

      NY Times: Feds Accelerating Naturalization Of Immigrants To “Reshape The Electorate”
      https://www.zerohedge.com/political/ny-times-feds-accelerating-naturalization-immigrants-reshape-electorate

      “The federal government is processing citizenship requests at the fastest clip in a decade, moving rapidly through a backlog that built up during the Trump administration and the coronavirus pandemic,” reports the newspaper.

      One Honduran woman marveled at the fact that authorities were able to process and approve her application in as little as six months.

      The story highlights how many of these new citizens will immediately become eligible to vote in key battleground states, including Georgia, Arizona, Nevada and Pennsylvania.

      The piece includes a very revealing quote from Xiao Wang, chief executive of Boundless, a data analysis company.

      “The surge in naturalization efficiency isn’t just about clearing backlogs; it’s potentially reshaping the electorate, merely months before a pivotal election,” said Wang.

      “Every citizenship application could be a vote that decides Senate seats or even the presidency,” he added.

      1. Zeb   10 months ago

        So nobody cares any more that they say the quiet part out loud?

        1. Medulla Oblongata   10 months ago

          The Left insists that concerns from certain quarters that immigration policy in America (and Europe) amounts to a “great replacement” is a “dangerous,” “evil,” “racist,” “false” “conspiracy theory.” But a leftist New York Times columnist can write an article entitled “We Can Replace Them” and … nothing. Same fundamental point, except she’s all for it and her targets aren’t. A U.S. Senator can exult that demographic change will doom Republicans. Joe Biden himself can refer to an “unrelenting stream of immigration.” Except they’re celebrating it and calling for it. Anyone on the Right who uses the exact same words will not merely be denounced; the very fact pattern that is affirmed when Biden says it will be denied when the Rightist repeats it.

          https://americanmind.org/salvo/thats-not-happening-and-its-good-that-it-is/

      2. chemjeff radical individualist   10 months ago

        Note to all: these are LEGAL immigrants. LEGAL. These are the ones patiently waiting in line like you demand of them.

        The real crime here is that there is even such a huge backlog in the first place. Why shouldn’t immigrants who are close to the “front of the line” be afforded the opportunity to vote in this election? That is what they have waited all these years for.

        So I don’t want to hear again about “conflating legal and illegal immigration”. You and your team complain about BOTH and just use illegal immigration as a motte-and-bailey tactic. And responses like this only prove it.

        1. Jefferson Paul   10 months ago

          You’ve called “asylum seekers” legal immigrants, so it’s rich for you to scold others on shifty language games.

          1. chemjeff radical individualist   10 months ago

            Asylum seekers, at least the ones who are currently going through the asylum process, are legal migrants because they haven’t broken any laws.

            It is the same with the Haitian migrants in Springfield, Ohio that JV Dunce complained about in one of his speeches:

            https://www.dailysignal.com/2024/07/11/jd-vance-america-is-homeland-not-just-idea/

            He cited Springfield, Ohio, as an example of what happens when a city has a massive increase in immigration in a short time.

            Vance said this small city has seen its population nearly double, with mostly Haitian illegal aliens, and that has caused housing prices to skyrocket.

            “Now go to Springfield, go to Clark County, Ohio, and ask the people there whether they have been enriched by 20,000 newcomers in four years,” he said. “[The price of housing] is through the roof.”

            Middle-class people who have lived in the city for generations can’t afford a place to live, Vance said.

            “A third of the local county health budget is tied up in giving free benefits to illegal immigrants,” he said.

            Vance noted that these people aren’t technically illegal aliens, because President Joe Biden’s administration has essentially made sure that nobody is counted as illegal.

            He complains about the immigrants themselves, even while admitting that “technically” they are legal immigrants, blaming them for welfare and high housing costs even though he presents no data for these claims.

            So in all these cases – asylum seekers who go through the legal processes to have their claims adjudicated, Haitian immigrants who are here legally, traditional legal immigrants who are about to become naturalized citizens – you and your team complain about all of them even though they are all here legally.

            At least Vance is honest enough to own up to his type of nationalism: citizens first, foreigners last. It’s not about legal vs. illegal immigration. It’s pretty close to a “blood-and-soil” type of nationalism.

            1. Red Rocks White Privilege   10 months ago

              At least Vance is honest enough to own up to his type of nationalism: citizens first, foreigners last. It’s not about legal vs. illegal immigration. It’s pretty close to a “blood-and-soil” type of nationalism.

              And at least you’re honest enough to own up to your type of globalism: foreigners first, citizens last. It’s not about legal vs. illegal immigration. It’s pretty close to a “citizen of the world” type of globalism.

              1. Chuck P. (The Artist formerly known as CTSP)   10 months ago

                Jeff is wrong. Haiti doesn’t share a border with the US and these are people who presented themselves at our Southern (Mexican) border as refugees in contravention of international law and treaty. They were admitted pending investigation of their claim, but they are not legal migrants. They are unprocessed asylum seekers.

                I wrote that first and then did some research, but unlike Jeff, the AI bot can’t call them legal migrants. I know I am correct in my assertion that they are required to apply for asylum in the first country they enter and that it is improper to transit Mexico to seek asylum in the US.

                Legal Status of Asylum Seekers in Migration Context
                Based on the provided search results, here is a concise and neutral answer:

                Asylum seekers are not always considered legal migrants in the classical sense.

                While both asylum seekers and migrants move across borders, the legal frameworks and purposes of their movements differ:

                Migrants: Traditionally, a migrant is someone who has left their home by choice, seeking better opportunities, employment, education, or family reunification. They are not fleeing persecution or immediate harm. Migrants may enter a country legally or irregularly, but their primary intention is not to seek protection from harm.
                Asylum seekers: Asylum seekers, on the other hand, are individuals who have left their country due to a well-founded fear of persecution, torture, or serious harm, and are seeking international protection. They are entitled to apply for asylum and, if recognized as refugees, may be granted legal status and protection in the host country.
                In legal terminology, asylum seekers are not considered “migrants” in the classical sense, as their primary motivation is not economic or voluntary, but rather to escape harm and seek protection. Instead, they are recognized as refugees or asylum applicants, with specific legal rights and protections under international law and national asylum regimes.

                1. chemjeff radical individualist   10 months ago

                  The specific Haitian migrants that JV Dunce is complaining about, the ones in Springfield, Ohio, are not legally here because of asylum laws. They are legally here because they received “immigration parole” and/or they received Temporary Protected Status (TPS).

                  https://www.springfieldnewssun.com/news/how-could-temporary-protected-status-extension-for-haitians-affect-springfield/MKMVZDEGWRF4FPKAQNGFDOJD7E/

                  https://www.fairus.org/issue/immigration-parole-executive-branchs-shadow-immigration-system

                  That second link is a friendly (for you) immigration restriction site, and even they admit that the Haitian migrants are here “technically legally”.

                  And the stupid arguments about “sharing a border” and “safe third country” DO NOT APPLY in the case of asylum, with the sole exception of Canada, because, according to the LAW, the “safe third country” rule only applies to nations that have a “safe third country” agreement with the US. Only Canada does. Neither Mexico, nor Guatemala, Honduras, Nicaragua, Haiti, etc., do.

                  So your AI bot is actually correct, it seems. Not too surprising to learn that you are dumber than a computer.

                  1. Chuck P. (The Artist formerly known as CTSP)   10 months ago

                    What were you lying about again? They absolutely are here because of asylum laws. The TPS designation was issued long after they got here. From your own linked article:

                    “We are providing this humanitarian relief to Haitians already present in the United States given the conditions that existed in their home country as of June 3, 2024,” Mayorkas said in the release. “

                2. chemjeff radical individualist   10 months ago

                  You continue to prove my point. The legal vs illegal immigration distinction is a total canard. Your team objects to immigration *generally*, and only uses “illegal immigration” as a motte-and-bailey tactic to advance an agenda of restrictive immigration generally.

                  1. Chuck P. (The Artist formerly known as CTSP)   10 months ago

                    The legal vs illegal immigration distinction is a total canard.

                    Eat shit, liar. It is all about the wealth transfer that you constantly lie and claim don’t exist. Schools, hospitals, welfare, have all become a shit show because of the services that are handed to illegals and refugees along with grandma’s silver platter.

              2. chemjeff radical individualist   10 months ago

                RRWP, are you a blood-and-soil nationalist? Yes or no?

                1. Red Rocks White Privilege   10 months ago

                  I’m an anti-leftist and anti-globalist. But thanks for admitting that you put foreigners ahead of citizens.

        2. Red Rocks White Privilege   10 months ago

          Why shouldn’t immigrants who are close to the “front of the line” be afforded the opportunity to vote in this election? That is what they have waited all these years for.

          Why bother making such an arbitrary, ill-defined exception because you feel they “deserve” it?

        3. EISTAU Gree-Vance   10 months ago

          Oh yeah, are these the ones who wait *30 years* *as a group* to become legal, Jeff? Fuck they must all be nearly senior citizens by now, right?

          Bet they’re not, you lying asshole.

    2. JesseAz (5-30 Banana Republic Day)   10 months ago

      THEY HAVE A CHECKBOX. There is no way this is happening.

      Critic: there is “almost nothing” the public or political parties can do after an election to identify and invalidate noncitizen votes prior to election certification

      Democrats actually sued Arizona for passing a law to use SSA database to confirm citizenship.

      1. chemjeff radical individualist   10 months ago

        A Social Security number, or lack thereof, is not proof of citizenship.

        But we get it, you want to deprive the right to vote to those whom you deem “unworthy”.

        1. Jefferson Paul   10 months ago

          Why have any checks on voting? Why not just send everyone on EARTH a ballot, or multiple ballots (what if the first or second ballot doesn’t make it to each person, so let’s send dozens to each person on Earth)?

          It’s unacceptable if there is a possibility that one “eligible” voter is inconvenienced, so there shouldn’t be any checks at all.

          Actually, ballots seem inconvenient, even mail-in ones. Let’s just let everyone on Earth vote by texting. But then, some people might not have phones or not understand how to text. I guess the logical conclusion is we should just have serious, top experts decide who those phone-less people would have voted for, and count it that way. Because, really, having just registered citizens, who can prove their voter eligibility, vote is so undemocratic it’s practically fascism.

          1. Don't look at me!   10 months ago

            Experts choosing for us is the only way to save democracy!

          2. chemjeff radical individualist   10 months ago

            Why have any checks on voting?

            Strawman, no one here is arguing that. Go ahead and try to verify the citizenship status of those eligible to vote. But do it using a database that ACCURATELY reflects citizenship status. The SSA database does not.

            It was a patently transparent attempt by the Arizona Republicans to try to disqualify eligible voters, because those who would be most likely affected by these rules are (1) Native American tribes, who have their own sovereign rules and who may or many not have SS numbers even though they are eligible to vote; and (2) newly naturalized citizens (from those shithole Latin American countries, presumably) who haven’t yet received their SS numbers or had the database updated. And those two groups tend to vote for Team Blue.

            1. Red Rocks White Privilege   10 months ago

              Strawman, no one here is arguing that.

              You’re literally arguing that immigrants who are “close to the front of the line” should be allowed. So why the arbitrary limit? That is the logical endpoint of your dumb “everyone should be able to vote!” stupidity, just like the Democrats wanting to lower the voting age.

        2. Chuck P. (The Artist formerly known as CTSP)   10 months ago

          But we get it, you want to deprive the right to vote to those whom you deem “unworthy”.

          Jesus, Jeff, you have to be a citizen to vote. Asking a person registering to vote that question is absolutely justified and not asking that question is irresponsible.

          There are tens of millions of people in this country who are not eligible to vote. The Democrats are not even subtle about asking those people to register. I have been asked to register twice in the last week.

          1. chemjeff radical individualist   10 months ago

            Eligibility to vote is based on citizenship, not SS number.

            1. Jefferson Paul   10 months ago

              Should there be any restrictions or checks on voter eligibility other than having someone check a box that he/she is eligible?

            2. Jefferson Paul   10 months ago

              So no answer?

            3. Chuck P. (The Artist formerly known as CTSP)   10 months ago

              And every citizen is awarded a social security number upon request. Every native born citizen has at least 18 years before they are eligible to vote to apply for a SSN. Every immigrant is required to before they are awarded citizenship.

              What is your fucking malfunction on this?

    3. Social Justice is neither   10 months ago

      This was exactly the point of the motor voter registration push.

  29. Ra's al Gore   10 months ago

    Kamala Harris once pledged to close immigration detention centers ‘on day one’ as border record under scrutiny
    In 2019, then-Sen. Kamala Harris promised to close immigration detention centers on her first day as president.
    https://www.foxnews.com/politics/kamala-harris-once-pledged-close-immigration-detention-centers-on-day-one-border-record-under-scrutiny

    1. Moderation4ever   10 months ago

      That was five years ago in 2019 and in a time when the detention centers were looking bad. Nothing she has said that she would suggest she would do that if elected in 2024. What we do know is that Donald Trump blocked the one of the toughest bipartisan bills to address the border problems. I like to see that explained.

      1. Don't look at me!   10 months ago

        Trump is not in office. How could he have power to block a bill?

        1. HorseConch   10 months ago

          He has pretty well fucked everything up for them. Inflation is his fault, illegal immigration, crime, and just a couple weeks ago, I heard he was responsible for the bad jobs report.

        2. InsaneTrollLogic (Factio Democratica delenda est 5/30/24)   10 months ago

          He doesn’t, but never let TDS get in one’s way of a bad rant and shitty lie.

      2. JesseAz (5-30 Banana Republic Day)   10 months ago

        Parody and lies. Lol.

      3. Michael Ejercito   10 months ago

        “That was five years ago in 2019 ”

        Pretty lame excuse.

      4. A Thinking Mind   10 months ago

        That was five years ago in 2019 and in a time when the detention centers were looking bad.

        Oh, so she changes her stance on policy by figuring out which way the wind is blowing? That’s okay, then. Nothing there we can criticize.

      5. damikesc   10 months ago

        “Nothing she has said that she would suggest she would do that if elected in 2024.”

        She has said nothing to indicate anything has changed in her thinking.

        She has stances she has to explain and she will not do so.

        Which seems to indicate that, bare minimum, they have not changed.

      6. Jefferson Paul   10 months ago

        What we do know is that Donald Trump blocked the one of the toughest bipartisan bills to address the border problems. I like to see that explained.

        When did Trump try to stop the HR2 bill the House passed in 2023?

        As far as the “bipartisan bill,” you can claim it would have addressed the border problems, but only if you consider the border problem to be not fast-tracking enough “asylum” seekers into the country.

    2. Medulla Oblongata   10 months ago

      So just one of many flip flops, and if she wins we can expect some flops back to the flipped positions, as “facts change”.

      2018 Harris: We’ve got to critical reexamine ICE
      Now Harris: Strong border security and an earned pathway to citizenship

      2019 Harris: “Open” to SCOTUS expansion idea
      Now Harris: (Campaign) Doesn’t support SCOTUS expansion

      2019 Harris: “I support a mandatory gun buyback program”
      Now Harris: (Campaign) Won’t push mandatory assault-rifle gun buyback

      2019 Harris: “In in favor of banning fracking:
      Now Harris: (Campaign) Doesn’t back total fracking ban

      1. chemjeff radical individualist   10 months ago

        Well, here is something we can agree on. Kamalamadingdong has no core principles and will flip-flop on any issue. She is as pathetic as Trump on this score.

        1. R Mac   10 months ago

          Lying Jeffy couldn’t help himself.

  30. Ra's al Gore   10 months ago

    Haitian migrant accused of rape detained by feds while out on bail, DA says
    https://www.masslive.com/news/2024/08/haitian-migrant-accused-of-rape-detained-by-feds-while-out-on-bail-da-says.html

    He was released on $500 cash bail in June, though prosecutors asked for Alvarez to be released on $10,000 cash bail, Cruz’s office said. Judge Susan E. Sullivan imposed the lower bail and ordered Alvarez to submit to GPS monitoring, confine himself to a home at a Brockton address, not interact with the teenage girl, stay in Massachusetts, turn in his passport to authorities and any other travel documents, and check in twice monthly with probation, according to The Boston Globe.

    During his arraignment in Brockton Superior Court on May 31, Alvarez pleaded not guilty.

    On the night of March 13, police went to the Comfort Inn in Rockland at 850 Hingham St. after hotel staff reported a girl said she had been raped, Rockland Police Det. Sgt. Greg Pigeon testified in Hingham District Court during Alvarez’s dangerousness hearing in March.

    The hotel has contracted with the state to provide lodging to migrants. Rockland police took the girl to South Shore Hospital for treatment after arriving at the hotel.

    1. HorseConch   10 months ago

      Let’s see if we get Willie Hortons 2.0-67. There are so many egregious crimes that have been committed by illegals after being released that there should be one hell of a wave of ads featuring them. They may not be able to stop everyone from coming in, but most of these cases that get big publicity involve multiple releases by the authorities. How many times do we need to arrest an illegal to realize they may not be the best kind of newcomer?

      1. Michael Ejercito   10 months ago

        Remember A.J. Wise?

        I wonder why Black Lives Matter®™ did not protest his killing?

        1. Medulla Oblongata   10 months ago

          Here’s a black woman killed who will *not* be the subject of riots protesting her death…The man responsible for her death was ordered deported during the Trump administration, but didn’t show up for his hearing. He was arrested several times, too, but in sanctuary cities no one checked his status.

          ——————————

          An illegal immigrant with numerous run-ins with the law who was ordered deported six years ago stands accused of killing a young Virginia college student in a horrific car crash, according to a local report. Honduran national Elvis Jamir Cruz-Ferrera, 18, is charged with involuntary manslaughter in connection with the February death of Old Dominion University student Lauryn Ni’Kole Leonard, 19, according to the Virginia Pilot. The night Leonard was killed, she was driving her gray 2000 Toyota Solara on Interstate 664 in Chesapeake back to her apartment in Norfolk around 6 p.m. when Cruz-Ferrara smashed into her, causing both drivers to lose control and hit the guardrails, according to the outlet. An immigration judge had ordered Cruz-Ferrera’s deportation back in 2018, during a hearing he didn’t appear for, after he crossed the border illegally, Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) said.

          Cruz-Ferrera has an immigration hold on his case and is being held without bond. He faces up to ten years in prison. Cruz-Ferrera crossed the southern border into McAllen, Texas, in October 2016 when he was 11-years-old…Cruz-Ferrera had several run-ins with cops over traffic stops in the months leading up to the crash, according to the local outlet. However, authorities didn’t investigate his immigration status at the time…In November of last year, Cruz-Ferrera was caught driving recklessly — going 85 mph in a 60 mph zone — near where the fatal crash occurred. He was also twice cited for driving without a license. Hargrove said his sister might still be alive if Cruz-Ferrera had been deported. “I think it’s crazy,” Hargrove said. “Like, how come nobody looked into it? … She’s minding her own business and you come out of nowhere and just turned my life upside down.”

  31. Ra's al Gore   10 months ago

    Harris County DA Charges Former Election Worker With 6 Felonies
    https://dallasexpress.com/state/harris-county-da-charges-former-election-worker-with-6-felonies/
    Harris County District Attorney Kim Ogg held a press conference on Tuesday to announce that a former election worker has been charged with six felonies related to the 2022 general election.

    “Anytime that two or more affidavits are filed by citizens in the State of Texas complaining about an election violation, by law the district attorney is required to investigate. That is what happened in this election. Multiple affidavits were filed, sent to us immediately after the election, and we did what we always do. We called in an independent investigative agency — the Texas Rangers,” Ogg said.

    Harris County’s election was marred by numerous issues, including long lines, disruptions from voting machine failures, and a significant shortage of paper ballots at polling locations, Ogg said, noting that a lack of paper ballots at some locations directly resulted in people not voting.

    “We know this was a failure in terms of an election that the government has a responsibility to run effectively, ethically, and most importantly accurately,” Ogg said.

    A criminal investigation determined that a former county elections employee was responsible.

    “Defendant Darryl Blackburn, who worked in the now defunct elections administrator’s office, has been charged with six felony charges, five of them tampering with a document, one theft by public official,” Ogg said.

    Blackburn had been specifically tasked with ensuring that enough paper ballots were distributed to all of the polling locations in Harris County.

    Ogg said Blackburn did not do his job and made the public lose trust in the election process. While allegedly representing that his job as a county elections employee was his only full-time job, he maintained a second full-time job and purportedly lied on county timesheets.

    “Much more importantly, he stole individuals’ right to vote. … That is the real cost, and it is priceless,” Ogg said.

    1. Ra's al Gore   10 months ago

      This is what won. Trigger warning, she is an idiot

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E702qE4R1KY

      1. Jefferson Paul   10 months ago

        Holy shit! I don’t know if I’ve ever seen/heard a more obnoxious politician.

  32. sarcasmic   10 months ago

    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13741377/Inside-Trumps-meltdown-Ex-president-lighting-staff-hes-p-ssed-picking-JD-Vance-insiders-fear-hes-going-fire-two-extremely-talented-campaign-gurus.html

    Inside Trump’s ‘meltdown’: Ex-president ‘is lighting up his staff because he’s p*ssed’ about picking JD Vance – as insiders fear he’s going to fire two ‘extremely talented’ campaign gurus

    1. Mother's Lament   10 months ago

      “insiders have revealed.”

      Lol, anonymous sources again. 10-1 they’re Harris campaign insiders.

      “The former president’s reported meltdown has been exposed by sources close to Trump as he continues to slide in the polls following President Joe Biden’s exit and Kamala Harris’ rise to the top of the Democratic ticket.”

      Who’s reporting a “meltdown”? The same anonymous “insiders”? Also he’s been holding just fine in the polls against a candidate switch, what new gaslighting is this?

      ‘I think that he feels this election slipping away from him, and that’s where you’re beginning to see him spiral,’ Sarah Matthews, a former Trump spokeswoman told MSNBC. “

      Ah, the bitter fired girl who was canned and then worked with the J6 committee tells the Democratic Party organ. So it’s a Kamala campaign ad.

      1. sarcasmic   10 months ago

        When you don’t like the message, attack the messenger.

        1. InsaneTrollLogic (Factio Democratica delenda est 5/30/24)   10 months ago

          Face it, Sarc, the Daily Fail is a rag unworthy of lining a bird cage.

          1. JesseAz (5-30 Banana Republic Day)   10 months ago

            It is as believable as Trump lunging for the wheel on J6. Another story sarc pushed.

            1. Bertram Guilfoyle   10 months ago

              But you didn’t like that message, so you just ATTTACCCCKKKK’d the messenger. Just like how you won’t vote for Oliver cuz he’s gay.

              Sarc is obviously the smartest guy here, and the most libertarian.

              1. Chuck P. (The Artist formerly known as CTSP)   10 months ago

                As the kids will be saying soon, Sarc is a double-plus libertarian.

          2. Mother's Lament   10 months ago

            “the Daily Fail is a rag unworthy”

            The Daily Fail was just fine. They were merely repeating what the Harris campaign was pushing and identified it as such.

            The real problem is that Sarc doesn’t read his own links past the headline and the lead.

            1. Chuck P. (The Artist formerly known as CTSP)   10 months ago

              Of course he doesn’t read it. He has to get it it posted quickly so he can rush off to relieve his raging hard-on.

        2. JesseAz (5-30 Banana Republic Day)   10 months ago

          Just 2 days ago you dismissed the fact Chase supports special protections because there were no quotes. Here you accept information without quotes or names of sources.

          What’s (D)ifferent?

          1. Bertram Guilfoyle   10 months ago

            Sarc has made it very clear that he and jeff are exempt from all conventions of logic, common sense, and consistency. Pointing out when they do it is a gotcha game.

            Stop being a mean girl.

        3. Mother's Lament   10 months ago

          When you don’t like the message, attack the messenger.

          AND JUST WHO EXACTLY DID THE PAPER SAY WAS THE “MESSENGER” SARCKLES?

          The only people saying that this happened are the Harris/Walz team, you fucking idiot.

          You’d lose your shit if I posted a story by the Trump campaign claiming Team Harris was secretly fighting inside the campaign.

          1. sarcasmic   10 months ago

            You’d lose your shit if I posted a story by the Trump campaign claiming Team Harris was secretly fighting inside the campaign.

            Actually I wouldn’t give a shit, just as I don’t give a shit about this article that you’re having a cow over. While you’d take it as The Word Of God and do what you always do, which is attack anyone who dared to question it.

            1. Bertram Guilfoyle   10 months ago

              “I don’t give a shit about this article that you’re having a cow over. ”

              Aren’t you the one who posted it? Have you tried seeing someone about your short term memory problems?

              1. Mother's Lament   10 months ago

                Alcohol related memory loss is the only thing keeping the hypocritical troll from offing himself.

            2. JesseAz (5-30 Banana Republic Day)   10 months ago

              Gave so little shit you posted it and defended it.

              Good little lemming.

      2. Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment   10 months ago

        “Who’s reporting a “meltdown”?…”

        The lefty shit-pile posting as Ring of Fire on YT.

      3. CE   10 months ago

        Well, to be fair, Vance was a terrible pick for VP.
        All the mean tweets and nastiness of Trump, without the charm and charisma.

        1. JesseAz (5-30 Banana Republic Day)   10 months ago

          He did a good job charming the journalists outside Kamalas plane.

      4. chemjeff radical individualist   10 months ago

        Lol, anonymous sources again.

        “Anonymous sources” are only bad when they are saying mean things about Trump.
        But “anonymous sources” are terrific when they are called “whistleblowers” and saying mean things about Biden.

        1. sarcasmic   10 months ago

          Yup. Anonymous sources that say mean things about Republicans are to be dismissed, while anonymous sources that say mean things about Democrats are to be proven wrong.

          1. JesseAz (5-30 Banana Republic Day)   10 months ago

            Can you or Jeff give an example of your strawman?

          2. Mother's Lament   10 months ago

            “But “anonymous sources” are terrific when they are called “whistleblowers”

            “Yup. Anonymous sources that say mean things about Republicans are to be dismissed”

            Whistleblowers aren’t “anonymous” you deceitful retarded cunts. You do make up the most spectacular bullshit to pad out your lies.

            All were famous household names in their day:

            Frank Serpico
            Edward Snowden
            Peter Buxton
            Karen Silkwood
            Mark Whitacre
            Vera English
            Joe Darby
            Daniel Ellsberg
            Chelsea Manning, etc…

            The only exception would be Mark Felt as Deep Throat, and that’s only because he, Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein were participating in a op. rather than actually whistleblowing.

            You just lie, and lie, and lie, and lie, and lie…

            1. chemjeff radical individualist   10 months ago

              Whistleblowers aren’t “anonymous”

              Yes they can be, if they choose to be.

              https://www.whistleblowers.org/whistleblower-confidentiality/

              Here’s an example of an anonymous “whistleblower” saying mean things about Biden, that you all just lap up:

              https://judiciary.house.gov/media/press-releases/whistleblowers-reveal-security-failures-trump-rally

              1. Mother's Lament   10 months ago

                Yes they can be, if they choose to be.

                NO. They can’t. Sure they can do it “legally” but an anonymous whistleblower is never credible.

                All the real ones have always bravely put their name next to their allegations. Every – single – time.

                They didn’t anonymously snitch to the papers. Stupid deceitful fuck.

                1. Chuck P. (The Artist formerly known as CTSP)   10 months ago

                  He really is a fucking stupid bald faced liar. “Anonymous whistleblowers”, which is an oxymoron, get prosecuted. They have no protection under whistleblower laws if they release information without coming forward. That is true in both government and the private sector.

                2. chemjeff radical individualist   10 months ago

                  Oh so here we go with the goalpost-shifting.

                  ML, originally:
                  Whistleblowers aren’t “anonymous”

                  ML, now:
                  Sure they can do it “legally” but an anonymous whistleblower is never credible.

                  So he admits I’m right, but because he’s a dishonest gaslighting prick, he won’t admit it and he goes right to the goal-post moving stage.

                  This is the same type of nonsense that you pulled with the Trump lies in the debate. You kept changing your story over and over again to defend Trump at any costs even when he is wrong.

                  So I win, you lose, fuck off, I’m not playing your game.

                  1. DesigNate   10 months ago

                    “In the public sector, federal employees can confidentially disclose allegations of misconduct to the appropriate authorities through the Whistleblower Protection Act (WPA) and the Inspector General Act. Both of these acts state that a whistleblower’s identity must be protected unless the employee in the disclosure consents to reveal their identity.”

                    So they aren’t actually anonymous, they just have their identities protected from the public and possibly some of the powers that be.

                    That’s not the win you think it is Jeff.

              2. Mother's Lament   10 months ago

                “Here’s an example of an anonymous “whistleblower””

                Yeah, tell me again how effective that was.

            2. sarcasmic   10 months ago

              Then there’s all the whistleblowers whose identities remains hidden due to real fear for their safety. Can’t name them for obvious reasons.

              You just lie, and lie, and lie, and lie, and lie…

              That’s right. Attack. It’s what you do best.

              Heard this tune on college radio. You might like it. The band is Canadian.

              https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5JiJWc6JqfM

              That’s me being nice to someone who doesn’t deserve it.

              1. Mother's Lament   10 months ago

                Like when? Give an example where a credible whistleblower is anonymous.
                Not putting your name to it has always meant you’re lying in the annals of whistleblowing.

                1. sarcasmic   10 months ago

                  You want me to name people who were not named. I understand your point. The ones who write books have a name.

                  Point is that anonymous sources often give valid information. You can’t deny that.

                  1. Mother's Lament   10 months ago

                    I want you to prove you not lying by giving AN EXAMPLE OF AN INCIDENT. I was very clear, you fucking weasel.

                    1. sarcasmic   10 months ago

                      No need to get emotional. Sit down. Calm down. Wow.

                    2. Mother's Lament   10 months ago

                      Oh no you weaselly little fuck, I’m not going to let you play that game. Put up or fuck off.

                    3. sarcasmic   10 months ago

                      What game? You’re demanding that I give you the names of people who did not want to be named. I suppose if I was going to entertain your running away with the goalposts I’d look for leaks from unnamed sources that allowed a reporter to expose something serious. Shit, there’s movies about that.

                      Would you dismiss an anonymous source saying bad things about a Democrat?

                      I doubt it.

                    4. Mother's Lament   10 months ago

                      What game? You’re demanding that I give you the names of people who did not want to be named.

                      I’ll just repost what I just posted:

                      “I want you to prove you not lying by giving AN EXAMPLE OF AN INCIDENT. I was very clear, you fucking weasel.”

                      That game.

                    5. sarcasmic   10 months ago

                      ANONYMOUS SOURCES DON’T GET CREDIT! The person who uncovers things gets all the credit.

                    6. JesseAz (5-30 Banana Republic Day)   10 months ago

                      Is sarc this retarded?

                      Sarc. Give an example, no fucking name needed. Provide an incident.

        2. Chuck P. (The Artist formerly known as CTSP)   10 months ago

          Whistle blowers are by definition NOT anonymous. Kind of hard to deny responsibility when you are loudly sounding an alarm. Then again, I wouldn’t expect the guy who came up with “bears in trunks” to understand a strong metaphor.

          1. chemjeff radical individualist   10 months ago

            Whistle blowers are by definition NOT anonymous.

            Not true.

            https://www.whistleblowers.org/whistleblower-confidentiality/

            In the public sector, federal employees can confidentially disclose allegations of misconduct to the appropriate authorities through the Whistleblower Protection Act (WPA) and the Inspector General Act. Both of these acts state that a whistleblower’s identity must be protected unless the employee in the disclosure consents to reveal their identity.

            1. Jefferson Paul   10 months ago

              So the DailyMail counts as the “appropriate authority”?

            2. Mother's Lament   10 months ago

              Oh fuck off with your “Yes, but they’re legally allowed to be now” pettifogging twatwaffle.

              The reality is they always are public as part of their credibility. Anonymous whistleblowers have no credibility.

              1. sarcasmic   10 months ago

                You’re moving the goalposts by requiring that the whistleblower identify themselves. That’s not always the case.

                What me and jeff agree on is that we think you judge anonymous sources based upon who they are criticizing.

                Wait and see. I’m not going to bookmark this. I’m not a loser. You can though.

                1. Mother's Lament   10 months ago

                  It is ALWAYS the case.

                  Deep Throat was the one exception, and we now know that Mark Felt and Carl Bernstein were both working with the CIA on making the whole thing happen, so that is the exception that proves the point.

                  Also, how did the people gossiping to a paper that Trump is mad become regarded as whistleblowers by you and Kreemjeff in the first place, you deceitful little cunt.

                  1. sarcasmic   10 months ago

                    It is ALWAYS the case.

                    Deep Throat was the one exception

                    Don’t lead by contradicting yourself. Isn’t a good look.

                    1. Mother's Lament   10 months ago

                      Don’t be deliberately fucking stupid. It isn’t a good look. I clearly showed how it was the exception that proved the rule.

                    2. sarcasmic   10 months ago

                      No, you didn’t.

                    3. Mother's Lament   10 months ago

                      Fucking moron. Read before you troll:

                      Me: “Deep Throat was the one exception, and we now know that Mark Felt and Carl Bernstein were both working with the CIA on making the whole thing happen, so that is the exception that proves the point.”

                    4. sarcasmic   10 months ago

                      You’re saying that anonymous sources turned out to be true, and were named after actions were taken based upon what they said. But at the time they were anonymous. It’s only an exception because years later people found out who they were.

                      That proves nothing.

                2. Chuck P. (The Artist formerly known as CTSP)   10 months ago

                  What me and jeff agree on is that we think you judge anonymous sources based upon who they are criticizing.

                  You agree because you are fucking idiots. To be afforded protection under the WPA a persons identity has to be known, BY DEFINITION. Their identity is withheld and that is completely different that anonymous. They take all kinds of risks because the investigators know exactly who they are.

                  Anonymous sources are unreliable because there is no risk involved. Quite the contrary, they get the satisfaction of fucking someone over. I would guess that is why you love your anonymity.

              2. sarcasmic   10 months ago

                I don’t know about you, but I have to take ethics training for work every year. One thing that they stress is that you can report anonymously if you fear retaliation.

                1. Mother's Lament   10 months ago

                  How does a drunken, wife-beating, internet troll like you not melt and turn into butter in an ethics course?

                  1. sarcasmic   10 months ago

                    Good dog. Good attack. You get a bone now.

                    1. Mother's Lament   10 months ago

                      No seriously. By all the shit you admitted here in the past you’re a terrible person.

                    2. sarcasmic   10 months ago

                      Keep attacking! Whoof! Whoof!

                    3. Mother's Lament   10 months ago

                      Were you screaming that at your wife when she divorced you?

                    4. sarcasmic   10 months ago

                      I had a sheriff serve the papers, just to be a dick. I divorced her. Revealing that you think she divorced me. Having troubles at home?

                    5. Chuck P. (The Artist formerly known as CTSP)   10 months ago

                      I had a sheriff serve the papers, just to be a dick.

                      This right here is the ultimate fruit of anonymity. It allows the petty little wanna-be tyrants of the world to vent their spleens in way that keeps them form the rightful consequence of having the shit knocked out of them for being so horrible.

                      Observe how this one pathetically brags about being vindictive and petty towards a person that once loved him enough to marry him. No sorrow or remorse, just the bitter gall of contempt. I hope he forgets one day that he isn’t anonymous in person and gets his teeth knocked out.

                    6. JesseAz (5-30 Banana Republic Day)   10 months ago

                      Well that’s a fun bookmark of sarc using the state to fuck with his ex.

                      New guess. Sarc hates cops because the sheriff fucked his ex.

                    7. R Mac   10 months ago

                      Funny shit.

            3. Chuck P. (The Artist formerly known as CTSP)   10 months ago

              Not true.

              Who the fuck do you think you are fooling? Their identity has to be known to be protected. Anonymous whistleblowers generate investigations and get prosecuted if they are caught. Quit trying to win the argument by ignoring the definitions of the words being used.

    2. InsaneTrollLogic (Factio Democratica delenda est 5/30/24)   10 months ago

      Since the Daily Fail decided to toe Labour’s line about the fake protests last week, no one should take anything they have to say seriously. Fuck ‘em.

    3. A Thinking Mind   10 months ago

      So their source for a lot of this is a guy who worked in the Trump White House 8 years ago, for 10 whole days.

      The New York Times has however reported that Trump has not lost any confidence in Vance and has been impressed with how he has performed on the campaign trail.

      Hmmmm….makes you wonder what’s being cherry-picked.

      1. JesseAz (5-30 Banana Republic Day)   10 months ago

        Wonder why sarc left that part out…

        1. InsaneTrollLogic (Factio Democratica delenda est 5/30/24)   10 months ago

          Well, Sarc does have a seriously terminal case of TDS, so there’s that.

      2. sarcasmic   10 months ago

        You’ve got an article with multiple hated sources that are always wrong because they’re hated, saying contradictory things. Must have made some hater heads explode.

        1. A Thinking Mind   10 months ago

          I don’t trust either of them, but I think I trust less the one that tells me he’s going to fire his campaign managers over Vance, when his son was supposedly the one who talked him into picking Vance.

          I can easily believe Trump is pissed about the polling. I really don’t think Trump is already regretting his VP pick because Vance hasn’t been bad for his campaign in any noticeable way and VP picks are pretty inconsequential. This supposed inside source doesn’t tell us which VP pick Trump should have made, or who Trump regrets not choosing over Vance, so it reads like completely bullshit from someone outside the administration who hates Vance and is putting his own opinions out as a “news” story.

          1. sarcasmic   10 months ago

            Vance isn’t Trump’s problem. Trump is Trump’s problem. The only people his attacks and lies impress are fellow attack dogs and liars, like the losers I have on mute, who were going to vote for him anyway. But to everyone else it just makes him look like a big, fat jerk. All Harris has to do to win right now is give him rope.

            1. JesseAz (5-30 Banana Republic Day)   10 months ago

              Major cope I see.

              So many specifics. You’re ire isn’t just because you hate him. Definitely not TDS.

            2. Chuck P. (The Artist formerly known as CTSP)   10 months ago

              like the losers I have on mute,

              He just quoted ML.

              https://reason.com/2024/08/14/harris-deceptive-ad-scandal/?comments=true#comment-10686100

              SHOW US THE LIST, SHITWEASEL.

            3. Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment   10 months ago

              As a slimy pile of lying lefty shit, you’re muted, until someone highlights your fucking dishonesty as Chuck did here.
              FOAD, asshole. Make your family proud and your dog happy. But don’t advertise your grave site location; we don’t want huge crowds milling around waiting to piss on it.

        2. Mother's Lament   10 months ago

          No you fucking idiot.

          It’s because the “sources” are no longer tied in any way to the Trump campaign and haven’t been for years, so how would they even know? And it’s compounded by the fact that these “sources” are now working for the Democratic party and its allies, and again, have been for years.

          1. sarcasmic   10 months ago

            ATTAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAACK!

            1. JesseAz (5-30 Banana Republic Day)   10 months ago

              Just here for honest discourse.

            2. DesigNate   10 months ago

              This is a stupid response to being called out and presented with someone’s reasoning for their argument against your position.

              1. sarcasmic   10 months ago

                What reasoning? All he’s doing is saying the article is wrong because everyone involved is a poopyhead.

                And what position is he arguing against? I didn’t say anything. I just posted a headline and a link, and responded to attacks on the source by pointing out that all anyone is doing is shooting the messenger.

                1. Don't look at me!   10 months ago

                  Take the loss on this one.

                  1. Mother's Lament   10 months ago

                    He can’t. He’s a troll. It’s not in his nature. He wants attention good or bad.

                2. DesigNate   10 months ago

                  Don’t want to speak for ML, but as I read the thread –

                  Your position: the article has hated sources so it’s wrong.

                  ML’s reasoning for why the sources are wrong: “…the “sources” are no longer tied in any way to the Trump campaign and haven’t been for years, so how would they even know?”

                  In his original reply, he neither attacked you OR the Daily Mail (the messengers), but questioned the validity of their sources.

                  And come now, you posted the link because you wanted to have a conversation/argument about it (not knocking you for that btw, as it’s what the Roundup is for.)

        3. DesigNate   10 months ago

          They’re always wrong because we can remember the last 8 years of them citing “anonymous sources” and it all being unmitigated bullshit. Just saying.

          1. sarcasmic   10 months ago

            Was the problem that the sources were anonymous, or that they said bad things about Republicans. Because I highly doubt any of the attack dogs in the comments would attack either of those outlets if an anonymous source said bad things about Democrats. No, in that case the source is a courageous whistleblower telling the unvarnished truth.

            1. Bertram Guilfoyle   10 months ago

              Rhetorical question: Do you ever stop and ask if the criticisms you throw at everybody here apply to you?

            2. JesseAz (5-30 Banana Republic Day)   10 months ago

              He was pretty fucking clear. It is because they lied about everything dumb ass. Probably why you trust them. Narratives over facts and all.

            3. DesigNate   10 months ago

              I know you’re not implying that I must be some Trump sycophant because I question the validity of “anonymous sources”, right?

              Edit: Also, whistleblowers are usually given that moniker by the media they’re revealing their information to, even if they remain anonymous for a time (ie: anonymous whistleblower vs. anonymous sources close to blah blah).

    4. damikesc   10 months ago

      Ah, they even quote Scaramucci.

      Certainly that is news and not bullshit.

      1. Mother's Lament   10 months ago

        Sarc and Kreemjeff want you to treat them all as respected anonymous whistleblowers.

  33. Super Scary   10 months ago

    “A worker at McDonald’s making $15/hour in wages vs a worker at a sit-down restaurant making $15/hour (wages + tips) should be treated exactly the same for tax purposes”

    I thought the point of raising wages for waiters/waitresses was to make it so we wouldn’t have to tip anymore.

    1. Moderation4ever   10 months ago

      It just pandering, no matter which side suggest the idea.

    2. Don't look at me!   10 months ago

      People making $15/ hr really don’t pay much in the way of taxes.

  34. Spiritus Mundi   10 months ago

    Is there any reasonable justification for singling out this source of income for being tax-free? Can any economists explain?

    Taxing tips is almost completely unenforceable. Paying IRS agents to enforce complainance costs more than it generates so in the long run money is saved by getting rid of the obligation to appear to enforce the law (which is always done in a unjust and capricous manner anyhow). Now, if you want to talk about taxing tipped v untipped people differently, then I have the answer to that as well, FAIR TAX NOW. Wages should never be taxed, the governmnet does not own the fruits of your labor.

    1. Gaear Grimsrud   10 months ago

      A tip is not wages. It is a gift. There is no minimum, it is completely voluntary. As I understand it the gifter is responsible for any taxes but the odds that tipping your favorite waitress would meet the threshold are close to zero. The recipient is not required to report gift income. Don’t know if this argument has ever been made in a federal court but it seems self evident to me.

      1. Mickey Rat   10 months ago

        I believe there is a threshold below which someone is not required to report gift income. Like you are supposed to pay sales tax to your state for items you bought out of state. It is largely unenforcable, but you are legally supposed to do it.

        1. sarcasmic   10 months ago

          Like you are supposed to pay sales tax to your state for items you bought out of state.

          Only if the other state has a lower sales tax. I live in Maine which has a 5.5% sales tax. If I buy stuff in NH I’m supposed to pay Maine because the Granite State has no sales tax. However if I buy stuff VT or MA I do not, because they have 6% and 6.25% sales tax respectively.
          Also Maine has very high taxes on booze, while NH does not. So on holiday weekends Maine State Troopers are known to hang out at liquor stores across the border watching for people buying lots of stuff before heading north. Once the people cross the border they’re stopped and arrested for smuggling. No joke.

          1. Bertram Guilfoyle   10 months ago

            How many of these smugglers have “illegal alien hunter” bumper stickers?

            1. Mother's Lament   10 months ago

              Maine is a hotspot for that according to a rather famous local drunkard.

          2. damikesc   10 months ago

            Sounds like a lovely state and not at all fascistic.

            1. sarcasmic   10 months ago

              Everything is a trade off. One good thing about ME is that fines, such as for speeding, go to the state not the municipality. So there’s no incentive to police for profit. Firearm laws aren’t bad, but the current governor is using the latest mass shooting as an excuse to change that. Taxes do suck in this state, and there’s a housing shortage. But it’s not bad compared to most of the country.

              1. damikesc   10 months ago

                Possibly. Reason has certainly been discussing the rampant problems in my state.

      2. Medulla Oblongata   10 months ago

        I suggest you spend some time reading about tips and gifts in IRS publications.

    2. Social Justice is neither   10 months ago

      Enforcement difficulty depends on what you’re talking about as tips. The restaurant tip is one thing and cash tips are probably unenforceable but it’s probably not a big deal to gather the tips/superchats to Youtubers through the various platforms.

      1. Zeb   10 months ago

        Good point about cash tips. That’s really hard to enforce. Credit card tips are quite easy to enforce reporting as income (at least for places that have updated to fully computerized POS systems, which is most at this point). A lot of servers I know just report CC tips and just take the cash. Which is why I try to tip in cash even if I pay with a card.

        1. sarcasmic   10 months ago

          It’s just assumed that a server makes a certain percentage of their sales in tips, cash or credit. It only becomes a problem if the employer gets audited. That’s when the IRS will look at every server’s sales and reported tips. If someone reports less than some arbitrary threshold, like ten percent, then that can raise some red flags.

  35. Moderation4ever   10 months ago

    New York is not the first place to look at replacing police as first responders for mental health issues. Many places including my city Madison, WI have developed first responder groups for response to mental health incidents. It a good thing and I hope it continues.

    1. sarcasmic   10 months ago

      That is a good thing. Because police will attack a mentally ill person who fails to obey, and kill them if they put up a fight. And nothing else happens.

      1. Bertram Guilfoyle   10 months ago

        “That is a good thing.”

        So what is the social worker supposed to do when the “mentally ill” person ignores her?

        1. Pepin the short   10 months ago

          Let’s hope Sarc can stumble his way to NYC and ride the lines.

      2. damikesc   10 months ago

        …and if the mentally ill person attacks the mental health professionals?

        Because that is not an infrequent occurrence.

        Get enough “mental health professionals” attacked and they will stop doing the job.

        Meaning the job will be back on the police again.

    2. JesseAz (5-30 Banana Republic Day)   10 months ago

      Seems to be working too!

      https://www.areavibes.com/madison-wi/crime/

      The Madison crime rates are 16% higher than the national average.

      Also didn’t need more proof you’re a leftist.

      1. Moderation4ever   10 months ago

        Jess did you take a moment to look at the numbers? Violent crime is lower in Madison than the national average. Including murder, where Madison was lower than the state average and less than the national average. Property crimes were higher but that has little to do with the mentally ill.

    3. Spiritus Mundi   10 months ago

      Wil it still be a good thing when these SCOUTs get pushed in front of a train?

      1. Chipper Chunked Chile Con Congress (ex NCW)   10 months ago

        Subway Co-Response Outreach Team, East

        “Wait, SCROTE?”

    4. Mike Parsons   10 months ago

      Wont be long before multiple well meaning social aid workers get beaten to death by deranged mentally ill people or just straight up violent criminals.

      I agree that cops may not be the best equipped to talk a crazy person off the ledge, but the larger underlying issue is a large homeless, drug addicted, mentally ill, dangerous populace. The solution may not be perfect, but its mostly because the underlying problem is one that isn’t easily solvable.

      1. Don't look at me!   10 months ago

        The first thing that 90lb. Mary Sue, the bespectacled frizzy haired social worker is going to do when the situation goes south, is call the cops. It just delays the inevitable and adds costs to the taxpayer.

      2. sarcasmic   10 months ago

        The dangerous ones are the exception, not the rule. While sending the cops creates a dangerous situation 100% of the time.

        1. Bertram Guilfoyle   10 months ago

          “sending the cops creates a dangerous situation 100% of the time.”

          You actually believe this? I’m not exactly the biggest cop fan, but I’ve had numerous interactions with them, none of which were dangerous.

          Do you ever think maybe you’re overselling your “fuck the police” message just a little bit?

          1. Zeb   10 months ago

            The point is more that you never know. There are definitely plenty of cops who are good at dealing with deranged people. A while ago in my town there was some kid who seemed to be trying to do a suicide by cop. The cop probably could have shot him and not many would have questioned its justification. But he managed to calm the situation and no one got hurt. Which was great. But there are other cops in town who I’m pretty sure would have shot him.
            People who aren’t acting crazy don’t have much to worry about from cops in general. I still do my best to avoid any interactions though because there are plenty of examples of cops who are violent assholes and you never know. Also, it’s their job to find crimes, so better not to talk to them if you don’t have to.

  36. shadydave   10 months ago

    “Her campaign is deliberately making it look like news outlets like The Guardian, NPR, Reuters, the Associated Press, USA Today, and Time magazine are on her side”

    But they are. What’s the problem?

  37. Earth-based Human Skeptic   10 months ago

    ‘Antitrust regulators set their sights on the stupidest possible target: Breaking up Google.’

    In a proletariat-egalitarian system, achievement and individual success will not be tolerated.

  38. Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment   10 months ago

    “SF developer is building housing everywhere, except in its …”
    […]
    “Why this S.F. developer is building housing in Texas, Idaho and Hawaii — but not its hometown”
    https://www.sfchronicle.com/sf/article/march-capital-housing-development-19630997.php

    Pay-walled, but in oh, so, blue SF, it takes nearly 10 years to build housing, even after environmental approval is granted.

  39. Don't look at me!   10 months ago

    Mr. Ademolu spends his days like this, pacing Manhattan subway platforms and stations, searching for people who appear severely mentally ill.

    Easiest job ever.

    1. Dillinger   10 months ago

      fish in barrel.

  40. Medulla Oblongata   10 months ago

    “Millennials are now wealthier than previous generations were at their age,” reports The Wall Street Journal. “The biggest driver of that increase was real estate.

    I thought the whole reason Grandpa Joe was paying off everyone’s student loans was because none of these kids could afford their rent, let alone mortgages and home ownership?

    Now you’re telling me they’re wealthier than previous generations? AND we’re paying off their student loans? Fuck that!

    1. Z Crazy   10 months ago

      Brandon’s plan doesn’t look like a handout for simply breathing.

      It’s an exapnsion of a program that requires public service in exchange for loan forgiveness.

      https://studentaid.gov/manage-loans/forgiveness-cancellation/public-service?nerdwallet&subid=d9cdc9ec59da4cfcbef99b6827c74442

      1. JesseAz (5-30 Banana Republic Day)   10 months ago

        So overpaid fed and government workers need more benefits.

      2. DesigNate   10 months ago

        Fuck. That.

        And call me when these motherfuckers are actually serving the public and not sucking at its rear while doing the shittiest job imaginable.

    2. Mickey Rat   10 months ago

      This seems to be counting the extreme price inflation we have seen in the housing market over the past few years as the increase in wealth. Just because your home is more valuable on paper than it was when you bought it does not mean you feel more wealthy. In fact, with the inflation in other sectors, an individual might be asset rich on paper, but cash poor in fact.

  41. Longtobefree   10 months ago

    “Harris’ Deceptive Ad Scandal”

    Truth in headlines:

    Harris Deceptive

  42. Dillinger   10 months ago

    >>I honestly fail to see the reason for editing these ads to make it look like these news outlets are on Harris’ side—the original headlines are flattering enough.

    might I recommend the latest book on Communists …

  43. Dillinger   10 months ago

    >>Harris’ Deceptive Ad Scandal

    I know I like to rag on your use of our language most of the time so totes props for using Deceptive and not Deceiving here

  44. Dillinger   10 months ago

    >>The laugh line that poor Stephen Colbert didn’t realize was a laugh line!

    cannot bring myself to believe Colbert is so ignorant to reality he didn’t know what he was doing.

    1. Medulla Oblongata   10 months ago

      I can.

    2. EISTAU Gree-Vance   10 months ago

      He asked fauci to consider running for president on his show. (Pre Brandon shanking).

      I believe he knew what he was doing there. A hugely offensive middle finger to all skeptics of government lies.

  45. Dillinger   10 months ago

    >>Is there any reasonable justification for singling out this source of income for being tax-free? Can any economists explain?

    economists? not likely. bartenders & servers? I didn’t report a fucking thing that wasn’t on a credit card receipt.

    1. Longtobefree   10 months ago

      But now, the friendly IRS that is only going after crooks making over $400,000 has a ruling that cash tip rate for a server must equal the credit card tip rate, and withhold at 8% regardless.

    2. Medulla Oblongata   10 months ago

      Tell us more about how you cheated on your taxes.

      1. Dillinger   10 months ago

        okay, taxation is theft. taxation of cash gifts is inexplicably evil. and it was like the early Clinton era lol.

        1. Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment   10 months ago

          ^+1! For haircuts, I pay cash; helping people avoid taxes is a particular pleasure.

  46. Dillinger   10 months ago

    >>though it is notable that “this is the first time that overall inflation, measured on a year-over-year basis, has come in below 3 percent since March of 2021,”

    yes, notable. probably for other true reasons, but yes.

  47. Rick James   10 months ago

    The Guardian, NPR, Reuters, the Associated Press, USA Today, and Time magazine are on her side by running ads designed to look like flattering headlines.

    What, the real headlines aren’t flattering enough?

    1. Mother's Lament   10 months ago

      To be fair, it’s probably what the real news outlets were planning on writing anyway.

      1. Rick James   10 months ago

        The Guardian is pissed because they were all, “Why didn’t we write that good a headline?!!”

        1. LIBtranslator   10 months ago

          DON’T MISS OUT! Dr Trump’s Butthurt Salve overstock clearance sale now!

          1. DesigNate   10 months ago

            That’s right Hank, shitting on the Democrats for their ridiculous behavior makes you an ass blasted Trump supporter. You figured it out.

          2. Jefferson Paul   10 months ago

            If the Butthurt Salve is overstocked, wouldn’t that mean that Trump and/or his supporters aren’t butthurt? If there is too much stock of it, it would be because there’s not enough demand for it. You don’t put something on clearance sale because it’s selling so well already.

            I didn’t realize you were a Trump supporter, Hank.

  48. Dillinger   10 months ago

    >>”Millennials are now wealthier than previous generations were at their age,”

    good for them am I supposed to be some kind of Jelly Kid about this?

  49. I, Woodchipper   10 months ago

    Antitrust regulators set their sights on the stupidest possible target: Breaking up Google.

    Someone needs to up their lobbying game.

    1. Mickey Rat   10 months ago

      I might have some sympathy and righteous indignation for Google, if they had not been pretty much evil and dishonest in their management of YouTube and such.

  50. Rick James   10 months ago

    Aha… hahaha! HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

    Yesterday I referenced a local article about urban centers’ obsession with empty trains in an attempt to “get cars off the road” and this is the above-the-fold headline in that same local daily today:

    South Lake Union streetcars shut down
    King County Metro says it can’t get the right parts from overseas to fix an electrical breakdown. The streetcars will stay in the maintenance yard indefinitely.

    The real question: Will anyone notice?

    1. Dillinger   10 months ago

      direct the unhoused to the immobile trains.

  51. Michael Ejercito   10 months ago

    More about Tim Walz.

    https://archive.md/Ua96V

    1. Mother's Lament   10 months ago

      The fact that the chubby fucker had the National Guard shooting paintballs at people who dared to sit outside on their own porch just a couple of months before makes it extra evil.

      1. NoVaNick   10 months ago

        That did it for me. Before, I was thinking I either wouldn’t vote or vote for Chase Oliver. Now, I will have to vote AGAINST Harris/Walz which means I will vote for Trump.

        1. Longtobefree   10 months ago

          Think of it as voting for the republican party.
          And be sure to continue down ballot to keep the democrats from hijacking the courts.

        2. chemjeff radical individualist   10 months ago

          But ML is lying, or at least his source is lying.

          The video is not about the police using paintballs to enforce a curfew due to COVID restrictions. It is about the police using paintballs to enforce a curfew due to the violent unrest associated with the Floyd riots.

          https://dailycaller.com/2024/08/13/video-police-shooting-paintballs-residents-tim-walzs-covid-curfew-enforcement/

          You cannot take anything that Team Red says at face value. Their entire media ecosystem is built on lies.

          I would say that curfews pertaining to actual, violent riots are qualitatively different than curfews about contagious diseases.

          But, if you say “it’s still the police shooting paintballs at innocent people!” – okay, fair enough. Here is how Trump wanted to deal with the violent protestors in 2020.

          https://www.axios.com/2022/05/02/trump-call-violence-presidency

          June 2020: Trump threatened to use the U.S. military to quell Black Lives Matter protests across the country. “If a city or state refuses to take the actions necessary to defend the life and property of their residents, then I will deploy the United States military and quickly solve the problem for them,” Trump said.

          August 2020: Trump expressed interest in sending the National Guard to Portland, Oregon, to confront protesters, per Vox. “We could fix Portland in, I would say, 45 minutes,” Trump said.

          September 2020: Trump lauded law enforcement officers for killing Michael Forest Reinoehl, a self-described Antifa member suspected of killing a right-wing activist the previous month. “That’s the way it has to be. There has to be retribution,” Vox reported.

          They are both authoritarian dickheads, quite frankly. If you want to vote against authoritarian dickheads, it can’t be a vote for either Trump or Kamalamama.

        3. chemjeff radical individualist   10 months ago

          And, the entire electoral strategy for both Team Red and Team Blue is to create a socially constructed “reality” that is, at best, “adjacent” to actual, objective reality. They feed you carefully selected snippets of information that seem “truthy” based on a preconceived narrative about the other team, but are not in fact truthful.

          Case in point: Remember how everyone freaked out about Trump’s “fine people on both sides” comment? The claim was, Trump was calling Nazis “fine people”! The REASON why this claim was so widely believed, was because it was consistent with a narrative out there that Trump was a Nazi. And the reason why this narrative is so persistent is because it is “adjacent” to reality. Trump says many careless things, sometimes authoritarian things, sometimes violent things, sometimes scapegoating foreigners, but he’s not a Nazi. But because Trump is so careless with his words, it’s easy for his critics to dishonestly paint him as one.

          It is the same type of phenomenon here. The reason why this video, of the Minnesota National Guard shooting paintballs at people on porches in order to enforce a “COVID curfew”, is because it is consistent with a narrative that Blue State governors are just authoritarian fascists particularly when it came to COVID policy. And the reason why this narrative is so persistent is because Blue State governors really WERE outrageously authoritarian on COVID restrictions in many cases. But none of them went so far as to try to enforce a COVID lockdown using paintball munitions. However, it seems “truthy” enough for those committed to the narrative that they are all fascists.

          The point is, if you vote for either Team Red or Team Blue, you are rewarding this type of behavior. A vote for either team is a vote in favor of “socially constructed reality” supplanting objective reality.

          1. Don't look at me!   10 months ago

            HE GAVE ORDERS TO SHOOT CITIZENS ON PORCHES WITH PAINTBALLS.

            Doesn’t matter why.

  52. mtrueman   10 months ago

    “Her campaign is deliberately making it look like news outlets like The Guardian, NPR, Reuters, the Associated Press, USA Today, and Time magazine are on her side by running ads designed to look like flattering headlines.”

    Where’s the deception? The Guardian, NPR, Reuters, etc. ARE on her side. Making something look like what it is: not deception.

    1. Mickey Rat   10 months ago

      The deception is that the specific gushing headlines and words were not published by those papers.

      1. mtrueman   10 months ago

        It’s calculating as is most advertising but I don’t think it rises to the level of ‘scandal.’ If you visit the NPR site, you may not see the specific gushing headlines in the ad, but you’ll find something similar in content if not tone. You won’t be deceived.

        I’ve noticed that Google’s Youtube descriptions are far more deceptive – ‘click bait’ is the term used to describe deceptive wording of links. A spicy headline lures unsuspecting surfers to click on a link that has no relation to its description.

      2. Rick James   10 months ago

        Mtrueman is correct here, for once. That’s why the media isn’t particularly interested in this story. It’s largely a conservative reaction. It’s like if I wrote the headline “Zyklon B, The Answer to the Jewish Question” and attributed it to the Guardian. They might not have written the headline, but it would accurately reflect their feelings.

        1. Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment   10 months ago

          No, trueman, as always, is attempting to finesse his way through a lie. “Hinting” (by deception) that a news organization ran a “faked” headline is a lie, period.

        2. mtrueman   10 months ago

          “and attributed it to the Guardian. ”

          What Guardian? The Manchester one? That paper has no such editorial policy.

    2. Bertram Guilfoyle   10 months ago

      “The Guardian, NPR, Reuters, etc. ARE on her side.”

      I look forward to mdipshitman pointing this out when sarcjeff, et al utilize sources like this.

      1. mtrueman   10 months ago

        All media have an editorial bias towards one candidate or another. I don’t feel the need to point out the obvious. You’re welcome to if you think it’s necessary.

        1. Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment   10 months ago

          You have a bias toward lying, you pathetic pile of shit.

  53. Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment   10 months ago

    BTW, props on labeling this “Reason Roundup”; searching around for a Liz byline can get tiresome before the first coffee kicks in.

    1. Medulla Oblongata   10 months ago

      ctrl-f wolf

      1. Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment   10 months ago

        Yeah, and then it gets turned over to the hair.

    2. Jefferson Paul   10 months ago

      https://reason.com/tag/reason-roundup/

      Just bookmark the above link and you will never have any trouble finding the Roundup.

  54. LIBtranslator   10 months ago

    I’ll watch the Lizard’s Pro Trumpanzista documendacity if Nick will do a commercial: This episode of the Reason Roundtable is brought to you by the Republican National Committee. Do you feel castrated now that actual women are demanding individual rights instead of just Kids, Kitchen work and Ku Klux rallies? Join the Republican party or our affiliates–the Colorado Libertainted party or Dum-dum Dave’s own girl-bullying Jesus Caucus. Enlist now, or you’ll be sorry you didn’t.

    1. Rick James   10 months ago

      now that actual women are demanding

      Suddenly everyone’s a biologist.

  55. One-Punch_Man   10 months ago

    You needed to show ID to get into Kamala’s rally but not to vote!

    I know gaslighting is in full affect but 48% still want to vote for her. Not elected, doesn’t do interviews, they see how the government has been for 4 years and yet…I’m losing hope for civilization.

    1. Don't look at me!   10 months ago

      It’s her turn!

    2. Moderation4ever   10 months ago

      Well not quite only 15 states require no ID at the polls. Also voting is the right of a citizen and attending a rally is not a right.

      1. Mike Parsons   10 months ago

        “Also voting is the right of a citizen”

        That ‘of a citizen’ seems to be the exact part that would require an actual ID, if one wants to have fair elections in a country with now 10% of the population being here as non citizens, and climbing.

        “attending a rally is not a right.”

        Interesting how flippant you are with comparing how we try to maintain the sanctity of democracy itself (your sides schtick, not mine), with going to a pep rally.

        Are you people really this unserious and lazy with all your comparisons? This is like “SEE! JD vance dressed as a girl for halloween therefore he’s a hypocrite for being against drag queen story hour!!!!!” levels of disingenuous and or disconnected from reality shitlibbery.

        I have 2nd hand embarrassment that you made such a poor analogy

      2. Jefferson Paul   10 months ago

        I know, right? Having to show ID before exercising your constitutional rights is wrong!

        I’m glad you support the rights of US citizens to buy guns without ID or a background check. I guess you aren’t a Dem masquerading as a moderate.

      3. Chuck P. (The Artist formerly known as CTSP)   10 months ago

        voting is the right of a citizen and attending a rally is not a right.

        I am 100% certain that you have that exactly backwards.

        Show us on the Constitution where the bad person touched you.

  56. Medulla Oblongata   10 months ago

    Watch how a D.E.I. consultant magically turns a video game into… well, something else entirely. (Babylon Bee).

    https://youtu.be/6xmXVUaafxs

  57. Uncle Jay   10 months ago

    If you like Biden, then you will absolutely love Harris.

    1. Moderation4ever   10 months ago

      I do like Biden when I compare him to Trump. Maybe if the Republican candidate were competent, like Nicki Halley, I might feel different. But Trump and Biden, I go Biden.

      1. Red Rocks White Privilege   10 months ago

        Maybe if the Republican candidate were competent, like Nicki Halley

        Yeah, what a shock that a Madison shitlib likes a Republican who will happily give his side half of what they want now, and the other half later on.

  58. Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment   10 months ago

    “Maybe if the Republican candidate were competent, like Nicki Halley”

    Maybe if you were competent like those who had an IQ of 60.
    FOAD. steaming pile of lying left shit.

  59. LIBtranslator   10 months ago

    If the Lizard had the brains of a Southern televangelist or the education of a High-School senior, she’d confront commie atheism with this: “And so, we set an ambitious goal to cut our greenhouse gas emissions in half by 2030 and to reach net-zero emissions by 2050.” — VP Kamala Harris. This is the EXACT same thing totalitarian looter infiltrators promised in the 1970s, if you replace “emissions” with “nuclear weapons.” Whether disarmed or drained of energy, the US would have no alternative but to surrender to armed, energetic totalitarianism if either suicide became a serious fad.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

How Tariffs Are Breaking the Manufacturing Industries Trump Says He Wants To Protect

Eric Boehm | From the July 2025 issue

The Latest Escalation Between Russia and Ukraine Isn't Changing the Course of the War

Matthew Petti | 6.6.2025 4:28 PM

Marsha Blackburn Wants Secret Police

C.J. Ciaramella | 6.6.2025 3:55 PM

This Small Business Is in Limbo As Owner Sues To Stop Trump's Tariffs

Eric Boehm | 6.6.2025 3:30 PM

A Runner Was Prosecuted for Unapproved Trail Use After the Referring Agency Called It 'Overcriminalization'

Jacob Sullum | 6.6.2025 2:50 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!