Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Money

Australians Abandon Physical Cash and the Freedom It Protects

Digital payments are easy to use, but also to monitor and block.

J.D. Tuccille | 5.27.2024 7:00 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
The Australian flag and Australian banknotes painted on a wooden background. | Cammeraydave | Dreamstime.com
(Cammeraydave | Dreamstime.com)

The end of cash has been heralded for years—mostly by government officials eager to end the expense of minting coins and printing banknotes while pushing transactions to digital forms that can be tracked and taxed. The transformation has met varying degrees of acceptance or resistance from people around the globe. But Australians appear to be eagerly advancing down the road towards a cash-free world.

You are reading The Rattler from J.D. Tuccille and Reason. Get more of J.D.'s commentary on government overreach and threats to everyday liberty.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Disappearing Banknotes and Coins

"Cash was once a staple in the economy, but it's fast becoming a relic of the past," according to an April report on Australia's financial evolution from SBSNews. "Just a decade ago, more than half of transactions were cash. Now it's just one in seven, and it's happened at an alarming rate."

Various forms of digital payments now account for the lion's share of transactions, with a growing number of merchants now refusing coins and banknotes, and ATMs disappearing around the country. That means cash is increasingly difficult to find and use even for those who prefer physical money.

The transformation was turbocharged by COVID-19, as people moved away from any sort of contact. But usage of cash was already plunging, according to the Reserve Bank of Australia, from almost 70 percent of transactions in 2007 to less than 30 percent in 2019. "Cash payments accounted for 13 per cent of the number and 8 per cent of the value of all consumer payments in 2022," the bank finds.

While Australian consumers and central bank bureaucrats embrace the shift, there are serious downsides to an all-digital economy.

"Digital payments have shortfalls, including their reliance on the internet—which can prove problematic in times of crisis," cautions SBSNews. The report described the plight of people cut off from processing services by wildfires that severed communications; those with cash could still buy necessities.

Digital transactions also require people to have accounts in their names, which is a challenge for young people and immigrants. And budgeting can be easier with paper and coins than with abstract numbers.

Unmentioned in the piece are any concerns about lost independence when all transactions can be monitored and, potentially, blocked. But that's a major concern elsewhere.

'Printed Freedom'

"Printed freedom" is how German economist Lars Feld described physical money in 2015 while responding to a push in his country to abolish physical cash. He defended banknotes and coins on the grounds that people "should be entitled to an escape from all-out state control," as Hardy Graupner of German broadcaster Deutsche Welle put it.

Such concerns came to a head in 2022 when the Canadian government cut off Freedom Convoy protesters' access to their own bank accounts and blocked digital donations to their cause.

"It's a Western version of China's social credit system that does not altogether prohibit political dissent but makes it so costly that it becomes impractical to the ordinary citizen," commented David Sacks, former COO of PayPal. He had already warned that electronic payment processors were working with governments to deny access to the financial system on ideological grounds.

Canada's crackdown was dramatic, but it didn't stand in isolation.

Digital Transactions and Targeted Industries

In 2022, American Banker reported that "a new code identifying credit card sales of guns and ammunition has been approved by the International Standards Organization, creating a potential path for card networks to help law enforcement agencies identify suspicious sales of guns and ammunition."

Amidst concerns that banks would help government officials track gun owners, and several states banning the gun-specific merchant codes, the financial industry "paused" implementation.

The merchant code controversy was reminiscent of earlier government efforts, under programs including Operation Choke Point, to cut off businesses disliked by politicians from financial services.

"Operation Choke Point was created by the Justice Department to 'choke out' companies the Administration considers a 'high risk' or otherwise objectionable, despite the fact that they are legal businesses," summarized a 2014 House Oversight Committee report. "The sheer breadth of industries affected – including firearms and ammunition sales, adult entertainment, check cashing, and payday lending – has generated significant concern with the objectives and scope of Operation Choke Point."

Notably, physical money offers a workaround for businesses that government officials don't like. To this day, marijuana is a largely cash industry for businesses legal at the state level but still illegal under federal law—a serious concern for heavily regulated financial institutions. For pot growers and vendors, cash may not always be ideal (it's a target for thieves), but it offers the freedom to operate.

Use It or Lose It

That was the sort of concern that pushed Germany's Lars Feld to describe physical money as "printed freedom." It also inspired Swiss activists last year to urge their countrymen to vote "yes to a free and independent Swiss currency in the form of coins and banknotes." Swiss officials rejected the initiative as insufficiently specific, but they also promised to incorporate protections for cash into the constitution.

Many Australians appear to feel otherwise, and they're not alone. With demand plunging for cash, Denmark stopped printing and minting kroner in 2016 (private companies will be commissioned to produce more as needed).

"One of the reasons why it is no longer profitable to produce coins and banknotes in Denmark is that the Danes increasingly pay with either credit card or mobile phone," BT reported at the time.

There is no denying that digital transactions are easy—sometimes too easy—requiring only a card or app, and not sufficient paper in your wallet. But despite the still largely unrealized promise of Bitcoin and other cyber currencies, most digital transactions leave records and require processing by third parties. Those intermediaries, under political pressure, can turn our own funds into tools of control. The more accustomed we become to digital payments, the more likely physical money and the freedom it offers will slip away.

"If you don't use it, you're going to lose it," Steve Worthington of Swinburne University's School of Business, Law, and Entrepreneurship told SBS News. "The less and less we're able to access and use cash, the more likely it is that we will lose access to it the same way we have with paper cheques."

It's something to think about the next time you head for the store to make a purchase.

The Rattler is a weekly newsletter from J.D. Tuccille. If you care about government overreach and tangible threats to everyday liberty, this is for you.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Archives: June 2024

J.D. Tuccille is a contributing editor at Reason.

MoneyAustraliaCurrencyMonetary PolicyPolicyPrivacyFreedom
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (56)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. SQRLSY One   1 year ago

    Government Almighty control of money will mean the end of guns-and-ammo buying in blue states, and strict enforcement of womb-slavery in red states! Even coat-hanger sales will be tightly monitored and money-torrid!

    1. LIBtranslator   1 year ago

      China banned reentry of Chinese silver tablet currency in the 1850s. The theory was it had to have been spent on opium and was hence tainted. So liquidity contracted violently there while British ships hauled Chinese silver to dump in America. Soon These States were coining Mexican-weight silver dollars to spend in China. By 1893 silver, tariffs and prohibitionist meddling had so distorted the U.S. economy that a communist-style party got 9% of the vote, then ruined the Cleveland Administration with its demands.

  2. SQRLSY One   1 year ago

    Hey conservatives!!! How about a “Grand Compromise”? Y’all give up your “abortion boners”, in exchange for lib-tards giving up their “gun boners”?

    This looks like a prime opportunity for me to explain a few things I’ve learned on this planet, while becoming a geezer. A few things, that is, about human nature, and excessive self-righteousness, tribalism, the “rush to judge” others, and the urge to punish.

    “Team R” politician: “The debt is too large, and government is too powerful. If you elect ME, I will FIX that budget-balance problem SOON! But, first things first! THOSE PEOPLE OVER THERE ARE GETTING ABORTIONS!!! We must make the liberals CRY for their sins! AFTER we fix that RIGHT AWAY, we’ll get you your budget balanced and low taxes!”

    “Team D” politician: “The debt is too large, and I’ll get that fixed soon, I promise you, if you elect ME! First, the more important stuff, though: THOSE PEOPLE OVER THERE ARE OWNING GUNS!!! We must PROTECT the American People from guns and gun-nuts!!! AFTER we fix that RIGHT AWAY, we’ll get our budgets balanced!”

    And then we gripe and gripe as Government Almighty grows and grows, and our freedoms shrink and shrink. And somehow, the budget never DOES get balanced!

    Now LISTEN UP for the summary: Parasites and politicians (but I repeat myself) PUSSY GRAB US ALL by grabbing us by… Guess what… by our excessive self-righteousness, tribalism, the “rush to judge” others, and the urge to PUNISH-PUNISH-PUNISH those “wrong” others! Let’s all STOP being such fools, and STOP allowing the politicians OF BOTH SIDES from constantly pussy-grabbing us all, right in our urge to… Pussy-grab the “enemies”, which is actually ALL OF US (and our freedoms and our independence, our ability to do what we want, without getting micro-managed by parasites)!!!

    Shorter and sweeter: The pussy-grabbers are actually pussy-grabber-grabbers, grabbing us all in our pussy-grabbers. Let us all (as best as we can) AMPUTATE our OWN nearly-useless-anyways pussy-grabbers, and the pussy-grabber-grabbers will NOT be able to abuse us all NEARLY ass much ass these assholes are doing right now!

    Or do you ENJOY seeing extra tax money of yours endlessly wasted ass BOTH SIDES pussy-grab each other in grandstanding maneuvers that actually do us no good whatsoever?

    The likes of Der TrumpfenFarter-Fuhrer and Ron DeSatan spend OODLES of taxpayer dollars “making the libs cry” with UDDERLY stupid KulturKampf wars (“Drag Queen Shows” cum to mind), while said Libs spend OUR money getting their panties in a wad concerning should-be-free speech (“trigger warnings” etc. for the snowflakes) on campuses. And ONLY brilliant geniuses like me can actually see that we’re all, collectively, getting abused by letting the political pussy-grabber-grabbers, grab us by our pussy-grabbers!!! WTF will it take for us to WAKE THE FUCK UP?!?!?

    You people are too stupid and too self-righteous to even see your stupidity and self-righteousness. I pity the fools! Keep right on letting the parasitical politicians grab you by Your Perfect Pussy-Grabbers, then, You Perfect FOOLS, and SUFFER the effects of your foolishness, till MAYBE one day ye will wake up!!!

    The collectivist pussy-grabbers of BOTH SIDES reveal their evil, stupid, self-righteous pussy-grabbing… By pussy-grabbing each other, all day, every day! And their “leaders” abuse us all day, every day, by grabbing us all, right in our self-righteous pussy-grabbers, while we’d ALL be MUCH better off amputating our own useless pussy-grabbers!

    1. Don't look at me!   1 year ago

      Nobody read that.

      1. Á àß äẞç ãþÇđ âÞ¢Đæ ǎB€Ðëf ảhf   1 year ago

        Zippin' meteors no! A wall of text loaded with CAPS, no need to even guess who it is, just bang the s[ace bar until it rolls out of sight.

        1. SQRLSY One   1 year ago

          Show us, on the doll, where the wall of text loaded with CAPS touched you, in a BAD way! Then MAYBE we can help you, unless ye are udderly beyond help now...

      2. SQRLSY One   1 year ago

        Nobody read that (your crap right above) either, because they were all too busy trying to out-pussy-grab the "Enemy Tribe", while getting severely abused by manipulative, lying politicians, who grab us all right in our STUPID and self-righteous pussy-grabbers! HELLO, dumb-fucks!

      3. Gaear Grimsrud   1 year ago

        Just a gray box to me.

        1. Á àß äẞç ãþÇđ âÞ¢Đæ ǎB€Ðëf ảhf   1 year ago

          A .... gray squirrel-shaped box?

        2. SQRLSY One   1 year ago

          Whoa, look at Greasy Gears the Super-Genius here, who's fingered out how to use the "Mute" button! Post us up a training video, please, Super-Genius!

      4. The Angry Hippopotamus   1 year ago

        Sqrsly replying to Hank replying to Sqrlsy? I think I'll pass

        1. SQRLSY One   1 year ago

          I, too, will pass gas from time to time! However, unlike SOME people, I will NOT allow said expelled waste gasses to fill my entire skull-case, expelling-ejecting my brain!

    2. Old Engineer   1 year ago

      At my age, I won't give up boners for anything.

      1. SQRLSY One   1 year ago

        OK, Cool!! Which do you prefer, “abortion boners” or “gun boners”, or some other kind of boner?

        (I have a pro-individual-freedom boner! Slavery doesn't work!)

      2. Ron   1 year ago

        They had abortion and still wanted our guns. so NO

  3. Chumby   1 year ago

    They were established a penal colony and bent the knee for covid. They will be fine with digital payments that prohibit them from basic liberty.

    All non-aboriginals should be sent back to Britain.

    1. Á àß äẞç ãþÇđ âÞ¢Đæ ǎB€Ðëf ảhf   1 year ago

      Even the Chinese?

    2. SQRLSY One   1 year ago

      I heard that many sore-in-the-cunt cuntsorevaturds support digital currency only, so that Government Almighty and its lapdog, banking, can lock OUT the hiring of illegal sub-humans, and renting apartments to them, and selling stuff to them! THAT will teach the illegal sub-humans, and PUNISH-SHIT-MINT really gets us ALL off, SOOOO much!!!

  4. Don't look at me!   1 year ago

    … those with cash could still buy necessities.

    Those with guns will still get what they want.

    1. Longtobefree   1 year ago

      As long as what they want is to be dead.
      In this area we shoot back; often first.

    2. Ersatz   1 year ago

      😉

    3. SQRLSY One   1 year ago

      Those with guns will still get to put the babies in wire cages, and lose track of their MomDads, in order to PUNISH the illegal sub-humans, dammit!

  5. Roberta   1 year ago

    I knew a libertarian decades ago who sported a "NO CASH/NO CRIME" button. He acknowledged that tracking purchases would make authority easier to be authoritarian, but considered it our job to ensure they not become so, and meanwhile thought the practical elimination of all economic crimes would so reduce the need for policing (and before-the-fact arbitrary spying and restrictions on commerce) that the elimination of cash would be a worthy libertarian goal.

    It's like how I think if the ability to read anyone's mind were developed thoroughly, it would abolish shame, and cause near-instant abolition of victimless crime laws, as well as of real crime. Plus, everyone would feel sorry for everyone else, and would be more generous to and tolerant of each other.

    1. LIBtranslator   1 year ago

      Was that Lyndon LaRouche by any chance? That guy embarrassed energy advocates by having hare-krishna imitators hand out magazines claiming men with guns had to beat up hippies for energy independence. Katherine take note: Fusion mag said it was "incoherent" to think you could repeal the pot prohibition Europe foisted on us and still have a nuclear industry. Reason Boardmember Petr Beckmann was convinced they were fifth-column plants. This was before Greta became the Democratic party's go-to nuclear scientist.

      1. Roberta   1 year ago

        No. But when I asked LaRouche on Barry Farber's show whether he was as vexed as we libertarians were by the media confusion of one for the other, he said he was. Still, I didn't think anyone at this late date would be conflating them!

    2. Gaear Grimsrud   1 year ago

      A libertarian huh.

    3. TheReEncogitationer   1 year ago

      With "Libertarians" like him and you, it's a small wonder that the Libertarian Party is a damn shambles!

      Again, just forget you ever heard the term "Libertarian."

  6. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

    Somebody help me out. The current image of Oz is a land of pussy authoritarians, but the social-political landscape must be more complex.

    I have been to Perth a few times, home of the down-under oil and mining industry, but it felt more like California than Texas. Where is the flyover country? What about MAGAs?

  7. Vernon Depner   1 year ago

    Black America couldn't function without cash. Their objection might save us from going cashless.

    1. tracerv   1 year ago

      Fani for President!

    2. NoVaNick   1 year ago

      Whatever the rich white assholes who are the cash machine for the democrat party want will be the law, for their own good

      1. Vernon Depner   1 year ago

        There's an increasing number of rich Black assholes.

    3. TrickyVic (old school)   1 year ago

      Businesses in NYC are required by law to take cash.

  8. LIBtranslator   1 year ago

    The land of convict transportees had the bright idea of forcing people to vote at gunpoint. The idiots thus elected defend this claiming the fines are "low" and that only those who resist are jailed or shot. They spare no effort or expense to shut down libertarian parties, so let's watch. The Soviet Union and Maoist China also hated money, remember? They told Ayn Rand and Adam Smith to shove it, by Dad! Wait till they come whining to the Almighty Dollar because another Asian dictatorship is kicking sand in their faces...

  9. TJJ2000   1 year ago

    "mostly by government officials eager to end the expense of minting coins and printing banknotes"

    Maybe government could just stop buying so much toilet paper instead, yeah? Talk about dumb excuses.

    1. Gaear Grimsrud   1 year ago

      The expense of printing bank notes has nothing to do with it.

  10. Medulla Oblongata   1 year ago

    Gah! Made the mistake of reading comments without being logged in so that the grey boxes show up instead of unhinged and incoherent rants. Much better now.

  11. Uncle Jay   1 year ago

    I can't think of a better way to control and to spy on a populace than have electronic banking.
    Keep up the good work, Australia.
    First you have up your guns.
    Now you gave up your financial privacy.
    Enjoy your fascism.

    1. CE   1 year ago

      Descendants of prisoners still want to be in jail I guess.

  12. Gaear Grimsrud   1 year ago

    Fun fact: Trump and RFK oppose CBDC. Biden on the other hand...
    https://www.cato.org/blog/where-trump-biden-stand-cbdcs
    The news of Trump’s stance broke on January 17 when he announced in New Hampshire that “I am also making another promise to protect Americans from government tyranny. As your president, I will never allow the creation of a central bank digital currency.”
    Trump later credited former candidate Vivek Ramaswamy—who spoke out against CBDCs throughout much of his campaign—for alerting him to the risks of CBDCs. In fact, former candidate Ron DeSantis also made opposition to CBDCs part of his campaign. Prior to running for president, DeSantis, as the governor of Florida, went so far as to ban Americans from being able to use a CBDC in the state of Florida.
    Yet, Republicans have not been the only source of opposition in the 2024 election campaign. Independent, and former Democrat, candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr. openly opposed CBDCs because of how much power they could give governments and how governments have abused their powers in the past.
    In March of 2022, President Biden issued Executive Order 14067 to place “the highest urgency on research and development efforts into the potential design and deployment options of a United States CBDC.” In September 2022, the White House said that the reports issued under Executive Order 14067 “encourage the Federal Reserve to continue its ongoing CBDC research, experimentation, and evaluation and call for the creation of a Treasury‐​led interagency working group to support the Federal Reserve’s efforts.”
    The Biden administration also announced that it had “developed policy objectives for a US CBDC, which reflect the federal government’s priorities.” Going further, the Biden administration published a technical evaluation for a potential US CBDC.

    1. Gaear Grimsrud   1 year ago

      Trump repeated this vow at the Libertarian convention but the audience didn't care.

      1. Zeb   1 year ago

        I don't know, I'd say half the audience cared. I watched the whole speech to see how accurately it was being reported. Even when he got boos, he got a fair amount of cheers too. I think a lot of people are overstating how negative the reception was.

    2. Don't look at me!   1 year ago

      developed policy objectives for a US CBDC, which reflect the federal government’s priorities.

      To hell with what the taxpayers subjects want.

    3. Old Engineer   1 year ago

      If Republicans oppose it, I guess a CBDC is inevitable. It'll probably be hidden inside one of the 4000 page National Defense Authorization Acts right after the section eliminating warrants for wiretapping and surreptitious entry of private property.

      Rand Paul and Thomas Massie will oppose it but the media will report that they are paranoids and that no such clause exists, and besides, Paul and Massie want to starve children, murder puppies and give money to white supremacists.

  13. Gaear Grimsrud   1 year ago

    We used to call places like Australia, New Zealand, Germany, UK, and the rest of western Europe, liberal democracies. Reason actually pretends that that is still the case. They are not. They are Orwellian authoritarian regimes and we should stop pretending otherwise.

  14. EdG   1 year ago

    What? "Digital transactions also require people to have accounts in their names, which is a challenge for young people"? I got my first bank account at National Bank of Detroit (NBD) when I was 7 years old. It wasn't a challenge at all.

    1. Gaear Grimsrud   1 year ago

      Got mine at 5 in Ypsilanti. Gave me a national identity...I mean SoSoc card the same day. Been robbing me blind ever since.

  15. TheReEncogitationer   1 year ago

    “Printed freedom” is how German economist Lars Feld described physical money in 2015 while responding to a push in his country to abolish physical cash. He defended banknotes and coins on the grounds that people “should be entitled to an escape from all-out state control,” as Hardy Graupner of German broadcaster Deutsche Welle put it.

    How is paper money “printed freedom” if the government can print it endlessly and greater than the amount of goods and services in the economy and thus destroy the money’s purcasing power?

    And did anyone else catch the irony of Hardy Graupner talking about citizens being “entitled” to “an escape from all-out state control” on a State-run media outlet?

    And just what kind of a name is Hardy Graupner that anyone is bound to respect? Sounds like some Dickensian bit character.

    You see, this is what happens when people don't actually read Ludwig von Mises, but still like to name-drop him at crypto-bro shindigs.

    1. Zeb   1 year ago

      Seems pretty obvious. Despite the problems with fiat currency and money printing, cash only requires that the parties to a transaction agree on its value.

    2. middlefinger   1 year ago

      Cues up season 1 of Doomsday Preppers.

  16. AT   1 year ago

    Same reason you should be filling your library with actual copies of original versions of books and film. The digital copies will make stealth edits. The later releases will be "updated" to sate the current religion.

    You own nothing if you don't have a physical copy of it, and that's why those in power don't want you to have one.

  17. Deep Lurker   1 year ago

    "In my opinion it is a mistake for the government not to issue the larger denominations ($500, $1,000, $5,000, $10,000) that are authorized by law." - Milton Friedman.

    1. CE   1 year ago

      Yeah, the whole point was to make it difficult to carry large amounts of cash undetected, or to pay in cash and dodge sales taxes. A hundred dollar bill used to be a fair amount of money. Now it's more like a twenty.

      They should bring back the thousand dollar bill too. New cars used to be less than 5K. Now they are pushing 50K.

  18. GroundTruth   1 year ago

    4% surcharge on credit purchases is making it easier to carry cash around here.

  19. CE   1 year ago

    Hey, if you have nothing to hide, why do you need to pay in cash....

  20. middlefinger   1 year ago

    How else will we get to one global digital currency, along with a global wealth tax, if there’s all this cash stuff floating around?

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

How Making GLP-1s Available Over the Counter Can Unlock Their Full Potential

Jeffrey A. Singer | From the June 2025 issue

Bob Menendez Does Not Deserve a Pardon

Billy Binion | 5.30.2025 5:25 PM

12-Year-Old Tennessee Boy Arrested for Instagram Post Says He Was Trying To Warn Students of a School Shooting

Autumn Billings | 5.30.2025 5:12 PM

Texas Ten Commandments Bill Is the Latest Example of Forcing Religious Texts In Public Schools

Emma Camp | 5.30.2025 3:46 PM

DOGE's Newly Listed 'Regulatory Savings' for Businesses Have Nothing to Do With Cutting Federal Spending

Jacob Sullum | 5.30.2025 3:30 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!