Alabama Governor Signs Bill Banning Lab-Grown Meat
Lab-grown meat bans don't protect consumers, but they do protect ranchers and farmers from competition.

Last week, Alabama Gov. Kay Ivey (R) signed a bill banning the sale or cultivation of lab-grown meat in the state, making Alabama the second state to formally ban the product. Alabama is one of a handful of states whose legislatures have considered bans on cultivated meat in recent months—even though lab-grown meat is no longer sold anywhere in the United States.
Lab-grown meat, also known as cultivated meat, was first sold in the U.S. in 2023 after the Food and Drug Administration approved two brands of cultivated chicken as safe to eat. So far, lab-grown meat has been briefly available through small-scale, restaurant-based launches.
However, that hasn't stopped lab-grown meat from becoming a culture-war hot topic. Alabama started the trend, with the state's Senate passing a ban in February. In May, Gov. Ron DeSantis banned the product in Florida. A handful of states, including Tennessee and Arizona, are also considering bans on lab-grown meat.
Alabama's law makes it "unlawful for any person to manufacture, sell, hold or offer for sale, or distribute any cultivated food product" in the state. Violators face stiff penalties—businesses risk losing their food safety permits, and individuals can face a $500 fine and up to three months behind bars.
Why are lab-grown meat bans suddenly so popular? A lot of it comes down to a fear of competition mixed with easy culture-war fearmongering about meat alternatives. Cultivated meat presents a clear alternative to traditional meat products—but instead of being excited by this new innovation, politicians like DeSantis and Sen. John Fetterman (D–Pa.) are seeking to quash this new possibility in order to protect the meat industry.
"We must protect our incredible farmers and the integrity of American agriculture," Florida Commissioner of Agriculture Wilton Simpson said in a press release announcing the signing of the state's ban. "Lab-grown meat is a disgraceful attempt to undermine our proud traditions and prosperity, and is in direct opposition to authentic agriculture."
Instead of letting individuals decide what to eat for themselves, politicians in Florida and Alabama are restricting their freedom—and the only people they're protecting are the state's meat producers.
"These misguided and short-sighted bills will kill innovation in a vital and growing biotech sector," David Voorman, a vice president at Food Solutions Action, a meat-alternative political action committee, recently told Reason. "Consumer freedom, consumer choice, and free market principles are also lost when lawmakers decide they know what's best."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
I want to be the first kid on my block to consume lab grown cricket meat.
But it won’t be organic free range!
They left a door open and the chicken cancer cell slurry simply failed to take advantage of the open air. How much more free range can it get?
Lab experiments are not actual competition for real food.
One of my dad's few 'war stories' was about talking to the cook about the powdered eggs. He was complaining about the lack of taste / texture, and the cook said "they just take out the water in the US to make it lighter to fly over here. Then we put the water back, and it's the same as before".
My dad replied, "Cookie, they take out God's water, and you put in the Corp of Engineers' water. And it AIN'T the same!".
An old Army cook trick is to mix a smashed-up eggshell into the powdered eggs. "See, real eggs!"
So your Dad didn’t think The Army Corps of Engineers and their water were made by God? Interesting Theology your Dad espoused there.
I’d’ve just him eat your eggs or don’t, but don’t get in the way of winning the war and quit harshing my buzz on life!
I don't get the apparently libertarian goal to destroy as many possible means of occupation as humanly possible.
Lab-grown meat will no more kill the occupation of rancher than the invention of margarine killed the occupation of butter-maker. Two products can live side-by-side and customers are perfectly able to decide which they prefer.
Especially considering that fake meat is fucking nasty. Now that the trend-chasing lefties aren't eating that gross-ass Beyond shit anymore, the company's going in the toilet.
Lab-grown meat isn't going to be any different. That ultra-processed "real" crap that gets served at fast food restaurants is bad enough, let alone something that got cooked up in a test tube.
Lab grown meat belongs in the same category as seed oils and Margerine. I hear they go great with Soya milk and Tofu.
Seed oil, motor oil. Much the same thing. Good old lard and talow will always be the best choice.
I would say lard for pie crust but little else.
Lard for frying chicken. Buttermilk soak overnight, season and bread with your preferred mix of flour, cracker crumbs or bread crumbs. Then fry in a cast iron pan half full of lard. Oh. It makes all other chicken pale in comparison.
God, can you imagine if McDonald's franchises still cut their fries by hand and fried them in beef fat like they used to do?
Animal fats have gotten a bad rap.
You can still do that at home with the latest Whopper-Chopper and an air fryer with minimal muss and fuss.
Infinite cheers for Cosmopolitan Godless Capitalism!
Animal fat would be healthier. You’ve been scammed.
They actually had some beef tallow in the oil for a long while and removed it, not for health considerations, but because the vegetarians were bitching about an animal product in the fries.
I never understood it. For fuck's sake, McDonald's asking vegetarians what to serve is like Tampax asking 12 year old boys about their products. It's just not your demographic.
Canola oil was used to lubricate machinery during WW2. Why wouldn’t you want to cook with it?
Do you know what seeds they use for canola oil? Rape seed. It's Rape Oil. The name comes from Canadian Oil Company. Can Ol, the "a" is to make it sound like a real word.
The chemistry to extract most seed oils is much the same as the chemistry of motor oils. Margarine was also a WWII product sold to Americans as more healthy than butter. Which was bullshit. Butter is way healthier than whipped hydrogenated seed oil.
No lie, I've had real churned butter with salt to flavor, and it's fucking amazing. Nothing in the grocery store compares.
I've had churned butter. Have a block in the fridge now actually. But it's too much work for not much benefit. I'll take the grocery store stuff and spend my time where it has more impact on the final quality.
If Vat-Meat is the same constituent elements and structure and olfactory qualities as meat that is raised, what’s the difference.
The opponents of Vat-Meat doth hath a Reverse-Placebo Effect going on, methinks.
While I doubt it will ever be a staple of the American diet if it can use something humans cant digest as "feed" it may not only save millions from starvation but provide them with a source of protein and fat that could make a serious difference in their quality of life.
It’s an option now. It’ll be mandatory later.
Sure it will. Seek help.
Put your slave mask back on.
Sure, you're the one who is free, hiding in your bunker with a tin foil hat and your multiple copies of "To Kill A Mockingbird."
Bans are bullshit. Mandates are bullshit. Supporting bans now just sets a bad precedent if mandates do come around later.
It's new, they're still working on it. I'm old enough to remember when most frozen food tasted like monkey butt. Nowadays, some of it tastes pretty damn good.
If you don't want to eat it, that's fine with me. But banning it for other people is bullshit. From a libertarian perspective, bans and mandates are both bullshit. Let companies offer it for sale. If consumers don't want it, they'll either make it better or go out of business. If enough consumers do want it, they'll prosper. If that hurts ranchers, so what? They don't have any more divine right to their current business than anyone else. Besides, cows are pretty artificial themselves. I defy you to find anything much like a Black Angus or a Holstein living in the wild.
"Two products can live side-by-side and customers are perfectly able to decide which they prefer."
This is true, but yet some are trying to ban gas powered vehicles and force us to use electric powered ones.
Al Gore pushed for a 1.5 gallon toilet over the original 5 gallon model and people like you flipped the fuck out then.
And then Gore's people banned the good toilets because people sided with it’s not inevitable….
Was this supposed to be sarcasm? Satire?
No. These days everyone uses the 1.5 gallon type and doesn't give a shit. It turned out to be no problem and all the bitching and whining was for nothing.
Funny, most chain restaurants and retail stores don't have those rabbit-turd toilets. I guess Al Gore's "Inconvenient Truth" bends with bribes.
What, you have X Ray vision and can see the water tank through the wall? Everywhere I go have the kind with the auto flusher and no visible water tank.
Maybe you live in Alabama where they get all the old toilets and think it's better than the outhouse.
A pox on the compulsory EV pusher's house too! Laissez-Faire means Laissez-Faire
How far are you willing to let that go?
These bans aren't like trying to force EVs on anyone, they're more like banning EVs for people who do want them. Call me crazy, but I'm not a big fan of either bans or mandates.
Exactly! Just like consumers can choose between grain-fed and grass-fed meats.
And if Vat-Meat is outlawed, only outlaws will make and use Vat-Meat. Which means that you could get real unsafe, dangerous "stepped-on" Vat-Meats.
You might even have illegal tourism to go get Vat-Meat where it is legal. Wunner where that's happened before?
Maybe some future Duke Boys will get in trouble for haulin' Moon-Meat in the General Lee and musclin' in on Boss Hogg's Vat-Raw Liver racket!
https://youtu.be/4GXh7DGdxnA?si=ue6XyHdwbxCPHXqC
🙂
😉
Yes. Pity the poor buggy whip maker.
The buggy whip maker still has a market with the BDSM crowd. The EV makers are given special subsidies and tax breaks, so there is the objection Libertarians would have, on top of the tons of technical problems with EV.
Just one example: My County has only one 3′ x 3′ box to safely deal with all bloated cell phone batteries in the County. EVs would mean the County would need multiple new landfills to deal with the massive $Multi-Thousand Dollar EV dead batteries.
The answer is to stop the fossil fuel subsidies and tax breaks and stop the EV subsidies at the same time. If you're worried about landfills then you should be restrictions on un-necessary packaging like all that plastic and cardboard packaging created just to make the product look bigger.
You can easily recycle used oil and oil filters from your ICE car, although a lot of toxic oil waste does go un-recycled. Likewise EV batteries can be recycled if the policy incentives are created and some makers already do this.
https://www.motortrend.com/features/ev-battery-recycling/
Stop subsidies!
Next paragraph: ..policy incentives are created….
It's amazing how, despite seeing this play out time and time again, libertarians still fail to understand what is going on.
The leftists who want you to eat the bugmeat and want to ban steak and dairy are relying on synthetic variants to be able to say "Look, you don't need real steak, we have lab-grown meat now," so they can start passing their favored laws. It doesn't matter if the synthetic variants are more expensive, or less healthy, or just not as good, they will browbeat and gaslight and lobby until they get their way and the libertarians will help them by being useful idiots.
The threat to the ranchers and farmers isn't "competition," it's leftism, and the point of these bills is to combat leftism.
What I find funny is how you ignore all the stupid shit that the right has foisted on us and focus on only how the left is a threat.
The threat is government no matter which side is in control. Yet again you go to government to stop government from fucking with you.
And upthread you defend banning good toilets because us retards wouldn't listen to al gore.
No. I point out that all the bitching and whining about how 1.5 gallon toilets won't flush my manly shits was, well, crap. Odds are this panic will be as pointless as all the other panics that people have had since humans came down from trees.
Most of the time there is no evil conspiracy. I know that eliminates the victim mentality Republicans are having these days but I've no fucks to give about that.
Thinking we are going to run out of water is a panic.
No doubt. It still turned out to be no big deal. Not everything morons in government do is going to lead to your enslavement. The market finds a way around the stupidity. Even if some people don't like the way the market finds. Drug criminalization made something Mexicans and black jazz musicians smoked into a bazillion dollar business. There will always be people who will risk imprisonment to get in on that high profit action. If the government tries to ban meat in 10 years vegans will be secretly eating it and conservatives will be screaming that meat eating makes you into a violent animal that will eat their own mother for a fix.
There’s no need for a formal conspiracy. All of these assholes have the same tyrannical mentality.
And there are plenty of slaves who accept it without question.
Were any libertarians harmed during the writing of this article?
Where do you find the "libertarian" angle on what is evidently creeping authoritarianism (mainly) on the right in the US? Are you assuming that only "libertarians" want to give consumers additional choices? It is capitalism which is giving people choices--which both Republicans and Democrats still practice.
In any case, giving people choices is not a libertarian concern--the market gives them choices (or doesn't); libertarians simply get out of the way.
No one wants to destroy occupations, we just don't want to artificially preserve those that are no longer necessary. For most of human history a majority of people worked in agriculture, either at subsistence level or to support a small upper class. In modern developed countries, agricultural workers only make up single digit percentages of the work force. I know which I like better.
Shorter version: drop dead, Luddite.
Cultivated meat presents a clear alternative to traditional meat products—but instead of being excited by this new innovation, politicians like DeSantis and Sen. John Fetterman (D–Pa.) are seeking to quash this new possibility in order to protect the meat industry.
"Nothing beats our meat!"
Except when our meat is on the grill after we rub the meat in a loving way with herbs, spices and oil.
Look, if I'm not allowed to drive my car by 2030, I at least want to be free to partake of lab-grown *checks notes* meat, which uses 342x the energy of non-lab-grown meat.
Negative energy budgets are commonplace for almost every woke substitute for something useful. Electric cars, lab grown meat, windmills and solar panels all consume more energy than they can create or save when you include all costs of production.
If you doubt this, then take away all subsidies and see what happens.
"Truth in advertising is a protectionist racket for industries that actually sell you what they promise and what we've all eaten for over 10,000+ yrs." - Reason Magazine
Alabama has a beef with this.
Too chicken to eat it.
Not even a poultry amount.
The steaks are just too high.
I'm bacon you to stop the food puns. :
We’re just chewing the fat here.
If the chickens revolt against those pushing for lab created meat, it would be a coop d’etat.
They wouldn’t have a leg to stand on.
Should we egg them on?
Just wing it.
Could be a lot of layers to this.
Especially in the Boneless Chicken Ranches!
🙂
😉
Sorry I couldn't join the discussion earlier, I'm henpecked at home.
Gotta keep egging on chumby.
I don't think he'd appreciate hen Bukkake.
🙂
😉
Probably the fear is that if they don't ban it now, it'll become mandatory later. That's how it is with a lot of issues, unfortunately: As long as the power is there, you'd better club the other guy with it before he does it to you.
Newsflash: You’re being pissed on and told it’s raining right now. The idea that lab-grown meat is better and can be had more abundantly and cheaply than natural meat is like saying they can produce more fresh water in a lab more abundantly and cheaply than can be found in all the Great Lakes combined.
There are places where there is no meat and too little farmland to produce it. Unlike actual innovations like golden rice, lab-grown meat specifically won’t help those places and isn’t intended to.
Then fight the Totalitarian doctrine of "What's not prohibited is mandatory," Dummy!
Small wonder the Libertarian Party has made no ground in 53 years with old fart Party people like you! Join, Hank, he calls you from his druggie den!
When your entire party is based on exploiting fear, when you run out of rational "fears" you have to invent new ones.
STATES RANKED BY EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT
(includes territories; 52 jurisdictions ranked)
HIGH SCHOOL DIPLOMA
Alabama 45
COLLEGE DEGREE
Alabama 47
ADVANCED DEGREE
Alabama 39*
BIGOTED HAYSEEDS
Alabama 2
* includes government employees imported from better states
Is Alabama the most ignorant, bigoted, backward, superstition-addled, parasitic state?
Maybe.
To be able to fix your own car or do basic plumbing or shoot and field dress a moose are abilities that do not exist among Ivy League graduates.
These "rednecks" and "hicks" will survive the Great Reset while the Harvard grads starve to death in the dark.
Real world abilities outweigh any woke bullshit.
Artie's a self-loathing hicklib who's embarrassed that he's originally from the same proletarian class of people that his side supposedly stands up for.
You're trying to argue that the typical Alabama resident is actually capable and willing to do that kind of work? It sure as fuck doesn't show on the quality of their yards and houses.
Not a lot of demand for baristas in Alabama. Everyone knows how to make their own coffee.
"BIGOTED HAYSEEDS
Alabama 2"
Cite?
Yeah, but Ivy Leaguers pay $Hundreds of Thousands of Dollars to end up as Jew-Hating and racist and bigoted as any hayseed Goober Klansman in Alabama.
Carry on in your rat-cage, Klinger!
Go ahead Emma, eat all the lab grown garbage you want. Shove it down your fat ghetto gullet.
Humanity could do without human trash such as you and Bill Gates.
Next, you'll be wanting to force the lot of us to eat crickets and grasshoppers.
Will be eating real meat as long as I can buy, catch or shoot it.
What’s the worst part about attending a cookout at Jeff’s?
All the hotdogs taste like shit.
Bearly edible.
Hotdogs in the trunk, along with the junk.
Oooof! Multiple quintuple-smooth layers of mystery meat humor there, Chumby!
🙂
😉
Paranoid much?
To write off the development costs, the lab meat would sell for 100 times that of old fashioned farm grown meat. Banning this stuff would be like banning $100 bubble gum. Lab meat, like electric cars, can only sell if heavily subsidized.
I'll believe in lab grown meat when Chick-fil-a stays open on Sundays to sell it.
All products start off more expensive in the beginning. Once the startup costs are paid off the price goes down. Look at the device you are typing this on. I guarantee if you adjust for inflation and look for a machine capable of doing what you're using right now from 10 years ago either the equivalent isn't even available or it was a whole lot more expensive.
No one had to subsidize keyboards. There was a huge market for them.
Not everything gets cheaper over time. It requires major improvements in the methods of manufacturing and a big market for them. Where's the market for lab grown meat? Unless the new lab meat is tastier or cheaper, no one will buy it. Look at electric cars. Even with subsidies, they are only a niche market at best.
Maybe there will be a market for lab grown human meat for people who want to experience cannibalism? Or lab grown human brains for environmentalists.
Ok, everything is an evil democrat conspiracy against the god fearing folks that are the backbone of this nation.
Do you feel better now?
Poor jeff
….can only sell if heavily subsidized.
If it’s banned, we can avoid that inevitability.
Sure, because the politicians who were bribed by the meat industry to pass this idiocy will stay bought when the fast food industry comes calling, offering bribes twice what they were paid before.
It’s all about the Benjamins.
Destroy the village in order to save it.
I have said that once the process is worked out for reliable cost stable meat, the fast-food vendors will step in and that will be the boost needed. Farm raised animals will be a premium product sold by a limited number of vendors.
Or "Let them eat cake!"
I have said that once the process is worked out for reliable cost stable meat,
What? These franchise chains almost all have their own food processing ops that help maintain price stability already. To the extent they raise prices, it’s mainly in response to minimum wage increases. Christ, McDonald's and Burger King are practically de facto lab meat as it is.
You are right and once the fast-food vendors can grow the meat in tanks the chickens, pigs and cows are gone. It is a natural evolution.
Uh, artificially grown meat has nothing to do with evolution, you moron.
Not biological evolution, but technical evolution.
In the sense of purely biological evolution, neither do modern pigs, chickens or cows. They're all the result of some profoundly unnatural selection, entirely human creations. When they're no longer the best option they're likely to be set aside, just like people stopped using stone knives once they learned to work metal.
No you haven't.
^
Lab meat, like electric cars, can only sell if heavily subsidized.
And that's part of the impetus behind these laws. Subsidies that libertarians don't even want for farms and feeding poor people are being used to support the lab-grown meat development at an even lower ROI than just paying people to produce beyond market demand and giving people free food.
And, again, it should be noted that lab-grown meat is unlike electric cars in that Chimps didn't swing out of the trees and discover vast pre-existing herds of Model Ts waiting for intelligent apes to domesticate and/or consume them. If electric cars are stealing a base, lab-grown meat as greater efficiency innovation is stealing two or more.
So the very same state government which would have to subsidize lab-grown meat passes a ban–instead of just not passing a law subsidizing lab-grown meat…
Lab Grown Meat: The Mastodon of food products.
Family farms to factory farms to lab grown meat, progress like time moves in one direction. Alabama has about as much chance of stopping lab grown meat as they did stopping black people from voting.
Well, it's not like they went gently into that good night on voting rights and I doubt they will be different on everything else that comes along.
progress like time moves in one direction.
LOL, ask any collapsed empire about that. What stupid historical deterministic drivel.
You sound like my son. He picks apart sayings and tries to add extra shit to them. He's a fucking asshole. What's your excuse?
Well we agree on one thing.
I am not talking about empires I am talking about progress. Specifically technological progress. Name a technology people have given up and gone back to the old ways.
Name a technology people have given up and gone back to the old ways.
"by the content of their character" hiring and social practices vs. DEI initiatives.
That's not a technology. That's at best a philosophy.
It's an example of progress not moving in one direction.
but... to address the question:
Name a technology people have given up and gone back to the old ways.
Streetcars and...
Electric cars.
Oh, and Germany giving up on nuclear and going with open-fire cooking in the living room, you know, to save the planet.
It’s an example of progress not moving in one direction.
Want to guess the skin color and political alignment of someone doesn't consider educating humans as peers and teaching them to use and even invent time-saving machinery rather than using them as chattel slaves to be any sort of technological advancement?
Having guessed their skin color and political alignment, wanna guess as to whether they'd disagree if I had listed all the specific torture devices, techniques, and novel, but not patented, Biblical interpretations used during The Inquisition that nobody uses anymore either rather than just saying "The Inquisition" religious conversion vs. more rational/apologist practices?
Some sophistry, self-fulfilling/self-retarding nonsense never changes.
Atomic bombs.
Seriously? We improved the fuck out of those. Iran is trying to make them still and if a nation offered to sell them nukes they would buy all they could. North Korea is definitely in the market for nukes as well.
When was the last time someone used one?
When was the last time you shot a home intruder? I've owned guns my whole life, lived in Denver and Colorado Springs for years. Always had a gun, never had to use it. Does that mean guns are a technology that we stopped using?
Nukes are like that, self defense for nations. Just because they don't toss them around all the time doesn't mean they stopped improving or making them.
What you're telling me there are no atomic bombs out in the world? Country gave up on the technology. Wow, that's a relief.
Goalpost shifting technology hasn't progressed one iota in the last 2,000 yrs.
Maybe not for you, but I drive a car, not a donkey cart.
3D television
Ok, that was stupid to begin with. Failures in marketing don't count as stopping the innovation.
It's an example of innovation-for-its-own-sake not necessarily meaning 'progress'.
While the idea of a 3D television sitting in your family room has not been successful, the idea of providing 3D video continues. The technology is there in the goggles designed to give the user a 3D immersive experience.
4 channel stereo
Stereo AM radio
You realize your phone is the technology that replaced that. We also stopped development on the manual butter churn if that's what you consider technology that was "abandoned".
I am not talking about empires I am talking about progress.
You're spouting off with a glittering generality. Shut the fuck up with that bullshit.
Family farms to factory farms to lab grown meat, progress like time moves in one direction.
No, it does not. Putting aside the lab-grown-meat-is-the-inevitable-future pablum, progress does NOT move in one direction. Any more than the world inexorably moves towards justice and peace.
No reason to ban it before you even know if anyone will actually want to eat it.
You want to ban it now before people start to like it because you will not be able to ban it after.
Yeah, there are a lot of city councils and mayors who wished they’d banned Uber before they discovered that people liked using it.
Yup. They realize this with all the milks that got loosed on us. Can't put that genie back in the bottle.
You should really let someone shoot you in the face before you decide if it should be illegal first too.
Again, ill-gotten tax dollars are being spent in order to develop these products and push these narratives. The groups pushing them advertise their goals on their websites and fly people around the globe in order to put on talks about them.
Nobody is falling for the "This is just about trannies in NC trying to use the bathroom. Quit moral panicking." bullshit.
You must have already had it happen to you and it shows.
#Libertarians4BanningPeacefulHonestCommodities
I agree these laws are dumb and anti-liberty, but to claim they're designed to protect farmers and ranchers, as Emma does, is laughable at best. At this point lab grown meat costs 50 or 100 times what real meat costs. Lab grown meat is not now a 'clear alternative' to real meat and probably never will be.
And manned fight is impossible, the automobile will only be a toy of the rich, 5 supercomputers are all man needs, yada, yada, yada...
Stick to your, "fear and trembling," Oat-Boy. The rest of us are saving ourselves with Reason and Science and Free-Market Capitalism!
Let's not forget what this shit is actually for--it's driven largely by the green cult who think cow farts are causing global warming.
So, to prevent some possible limits on individual liberty you support passing more laws now. Because.... um.... reasons. Yeah, reasons.
No, it’s more like I’m not going to get over-exercised about a ban on something that’s a stalking horse for a bigger ban down the road.
Edit: It's like a pro-liberty, pro-free markets magazine pushing a bunch of people who are suggesting a tiny bit of zoning reform, and then discovers that yeah, um, I guess some of these people are in fact crazy-pants DEI commies and rent-control freaks.
Britches resembles that remark.
It's disturbing when a magazine supposedly devoted to freedom echoes the globalist single government totalitarian agenda.
They have become vocal advocates for "live in the pods. Eat the bugs." Playing this stuff as though the underlying issue is one of more choices rather than one of authoritarians taking control to remove choice is either stupid or deceptive. Actually, I think the writers here are both. Their writing shows they aren't intelligent, but that also makes it difficult to miss the deception. At best, they are completely ignorant and too stupid to see what they are fighting for. More likely, they are still dumb but are evil and trying to make an anti-liberty agenda palatable to those who care about liberty
Reading between the scribbles, Reason is "echoing the globalist single government totalitarian agenda" by siding with individuals against the neoauthoritarians who are actually banning things.
Yeah, it's always fun to watch the wingnuts bleat "Freedom!" when it's clear they only support your freedom to agree with them.
As for the commenters around here, I can't quite tell if they're deliberately attacking strawmen for some bizarre reason, or if they're reading a completely different magazine than I am. Or maybe the endorphin rush they get from shitting on Reason just drives them to go full retard. I swear I can remember a time when the comments section here consisted mostly of civil people debating in good faith. Great, now I'm feeling nostalgic, and I hate nostalgia.
Burps, you genius. The vast majority of ruminant generated methane is emitted via the mouth. Farts come out the other end.
Yeah, it's not like there are any bans on incandescent light bulbs or gas-powered cars or anything that are worth talking about.
So why are they passing these laws, then? Bizarro wingnut virtue signaling? I'll grant that's a possibility, but I also find the protectionism argument plausible. That's the argument the banners themselves are presenting. I don't necessarily believe everything they say, but I don't automatically reject it either. It's entirely possible they're trying to strangle the cultivated meat business in its crib. If they waited until it was actually a viable competitor, their bans wouldn't stand a chance. Besides, these are the same idiots who want to "protect" dairy farmers from various kinds of "milk" that don't even directly compete with them. So I don't expect them to be entirely rational.
I don't think they should ban vat meats, but it should be a law that they can only be cooked in a microwave by a robotic chef. Why? Why the fuck not.
Well, it is Alabama. Irrational laws are their speciality.
For irrational laws I'll bet on California. They will probably ban non lab grown meat.
Irrational laws are irrational, no matter whether they're pushed by leftards or right wingnuts.
Why? Why the fuck not.
+1 “Must come in warm, fuzzy packaging and be marketed under any of the following brand names:
– Cuddles
– Baby
– Piglet
– Cutie
– Lolly
– Trixie
– Fluffy
– Scrappy
– Rover
– Fido
– Duke
– Doggo
- Bun
– Bunno
- Wabbit
– Yeller
The specifically designated branding can be foregone by the clear display of big googly eyes on the outside of the packaging.”
Best to mix 2 or more brands. For some "Baby Yeller", etc.
Also a good way of making band names.
Shh, Doggo Bun Bun is playing on the radio.
Doggo Bun Bun sounds like it would be a big hit in Korea.
Instead of letting individuals decide what to eat for themselves, politicians
...around the world keep trying to ban common farming and ranching procedures to 'save the world' from people trying to grow and raise their own food--instead of accepting government manufactured 'nutrition'.
Fuck all government bans on making safe, edible food in any way Who knows? Maybe one day soon, Vat-Meat can be made with a home kit just like salad greens and herbs with Sharper Image™ grow-lights!
Cultivated meat presents a clear alternative to traditional meat products—but instead of being excited by this new innovation
Don't ask questions. Just consume product and then get excited for next product.
Emma, this is like the sixth article on this subject in this month.
Why the heck are you guys carrying the fake meat industry's water so much?
Because so many Republicans want to pass stupid laws to ban it. Efforts to make more stupid government controls is what they talk about.
It's like you're illiterate or something.
I can't even with you sometimes, MrMx.
Because these laws are such bad ideas and so contrary to libertarian ideas. There are thousands of stories that could be borderline libertarian, but the government telling you what you can and cannot eats from Froe Gra to lab meat is purely antiliberty.
The laws aren't about what one can or can't eat. That's the point that libertarians are (intentionally?) missing.
...and in other news, the latest announcement from Big Brother is the ration of Victory Meat has been increased from 50 grams per week to 35 grams per week.
And once again the very people who love to bleat "Freedom!" prove they believe you should only be free to agree with them.