Come Back With a Warrant
Plus: A fight over Section 702 spying reforms, Iran threatens Israel and the U.S., Trump's proposed tariff is even worse than we thought, and more...

Spying stymied: The reauthorization of a warrantless electronic surveillance tool hit a snag in the House on Wednesday, as a group of Republicans revolted against Speaker of the House Mike Johnson's (R–La.) plan to bring the bill to the floor without guaranteeing the inclusion of key privacy-protecting reforms.
By a vote of 193–228, the House failed to approve a preliminary measure that would have set the terms of a floor debate over the renewal of Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA), which allows intelligence services to scoop up vast amounts of electronic communications between Americans and individuals overseas. The 19 Republicans who voted to sink the preliminary vote want to include a requirement that American law enforcement agencies get warrants before being allowed to access the Section 702 database to obtain information about American citizens.
Republican leaders promised to allow a floor vote on including the warrant requirement, but Rep. Chip Roy (R–Texas), one of the holdouts, told Roll Call that he was unwilling to support "a pre-cooked determination that we're not going to pass a warrant protection."
The need for reform should be fairly obvious: The FBI routinely uses the Section 702 database to troll through communications that have been "incidentally" collected from Americans who are not the targets of Section 702 surveillance. Even a White House advisory board has said the program lacks essential privacy protections.
Section 702 is set to expire on April 19 unless Congress votes to extend it. (For more on the fight over Section 702's reauthorization, check out this week's edition of Elizabeth Nolan Brown's newsletter, Sex & Tech.)
Weighing in: Both the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) and former President Donald Trump cheered the holdup of Section 702 reauthorization.
"Section 702 has been abused by the U.S. government for too long and the latest fight in the House only shows that Congress and the American people are fed up with the status quo," Kia Hamadanchy, senior policy counsel at the ACLU, said in a statement after Wednesday's House vote.
On Truth Social, Trump urged lawmakers to "KILL FISA" because it had been used to spy on his campaign.

Of course, it's worth noting that the last time Section 702 came up for reauthorization was in 2018—and Trump signed the bill to extend the spying authority without including any reforms.
What's next: The House will likely try again to pass the Section 702 reauthorization on Thursday or later this week. Johnson met with some of the holdout Republicans on Wednesday night and may court Democratic votes as well, Politico reports.
Iran draws a red line: If the United States helps Israel defend itself against a possible Iranian attack in the coming days, Iran will view American troops and other targets as fair game, The Intercept reported on Wednesday night, citing notes from a Tuesday meeting of the National Security Council.
That news came on the heels of a warning from American officials that an attack by Iran against Israel is imminent. Iran is seeking to retaliate for a strike by Israeli forces earlier this month that hit the Iranian embassy in Damascus, Syria.
Any additional escalation in the conflict between Israel and Iran would be a worrying step toward an all-out regional war. The possibility that U.S. troops will be targeted by Iran only heightens the risk of a growing conflict.
Despite that, Gen. Erik Kurilla, the top American military commander in the Middle East, is reportedly meeting Thursday with top Israeli military officials.
Terrible tariff: Trump's proposal to slap a 60 percent tariff on all imports from China would be a massive tax hike on Americans but could actually be a net negative for federal revenue too.
According to the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget (CRFB), Trump's proposed tariff "would dramatically reduce trade with China (as intended) and thus lead to far less revenue than" some estimates have concluded without accounting for the decreased levels of trade.
"Despite the much higher tariff rates on remaining imports, tariff revenue on Chinese goods would fall from roughly $65 billion to $55 billion in FY 2035 under this scenario," the CRFB's analysis concludes. In other words, Trump's tariff would disrupt huge amounts of trade, make many products more expensive, and wouldn't even help reduce the budget deficit. That's a serious lose-lose-lose.
Scenes from Virginia: While hiking in Shenandoah National Park last weekend, I came across one of the small, old cemeteries that dot the landscape—remnants of the homesteads and small communities that once existed there.
This one included a reminder about the human cost of central planning. (You may need to click on the image to make it large enough to read clearly.)

The widespread use of eminent domain against private landowners is a little-known, dark chapter in the history of many of America's national parks. To create Shenandoah, the state of Virginia condemned hundreds of properties with the stroke of a pen: State lawmakers approved the Public Park Condemnation Act and then appointed a committee of three men to decide how much each landowner would be paid. Eminent domain was used to evict over 2,000 people who refused to leave voluntarily.
QUICK HITS
- Chicago cops fired 96 shots in 41 seconds and killed Dexter Reed, a black man, after pulling him over for failing to wear a seatbelt.
- Waymo began offering driverless taxi rides in Los Angeles on Wednesday.
- Today marks five years since Julian Assange was incarcerated in Great Britain.
- Georgia cops are still hassling vape stores over legal products like delta-8 and delta-10.
- Former President Donald Trump's latest attempt at postponing his Manhattan trial has failed.
- Americans are still not worried enough about the threat of global war.
- A government-enabled monopoly is responsible for the loss of 17,000 kidney transplants in the U.S. every year.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
The reauthorization of a warrantless electronic surveillance tool hit a snag in the House on Wednesday...
If that snag doesn't turn out to be very temporary my whole world will be rocked.
Baby steps. This is the first time it's ever hit any kind of snag.
Hope it hits even more snags.
Chuck Schumer says don't mess with the intel agencies, they will screw you 6 ways to Sunday.
That was Schumer's message to Trump after Trump was elected. Look how well it worked out for Trump.
As I've said here before, a modern surveillance state cannot be overthrown.
The question is, is it in charge and we have a shell government.
The fact that no one in Congress did anything to James Clapper after Clapper told them to their face that he lied to them speaks volumes.
hang on, is this a both sidez thing or is one party responsible for this 'snag'?
Oh wait - I see ... it was those revolting Republicans 😉
You cant take them anywhere!
I guess it wasnt those freedom-fighting Republicans.
Both the American Civil Liberties Union (ALCU) and former President Donald Trump cheered the holdup of Section 702 reauthorization.
Ouch for the ACLU.
Next thing you know the ACLU will question official election results.
Trump's persecution by FISA proves that he's being treated just like everybody else. I mean, if you just ignore all those pesky politically motivated prosecutions, just like everybody else.
if you just ignore all those pesky politically motivated prosecutions
…and the proportion of other major name brand politicians that got the same FISA treatment.
If the United States helps Israel defend itself against a possible Iranian attack in the coming days, Iran will view American troops and other targets as fair game...
Iran is going to step from behind its proxies? It's a bold strategy, Cotton.
If Israel and Iran annihilate each other--what's the down side for the USA?
Fewer delis and food trucks?
A lot of IT and medical technology made in Israel. No SodaStream for you either.
And, of course, it would be sheer fantasy to assume that the Mullahs of Iran would stop with Israel.
They would if Israel nuked them into the stone age.
Other than turning complete control of an important geopolitical and strategically valuable area to purely Islamic States? Remember our first foreign war was against Mediterranean Islamic states.
Pretty sure if Iran starts chucking missiles all Willy- nilly around the place that all infidels will be “fair game” to them.
Like we needed a formal declaration. Duh.
Trump's proposal to slap a 60 percent tariff on all imports from China would be a massive tax hike on Americans but could actually be a net negative for federal revenue too.
4D chess from our most libertarian president.
Today marks five years since Julian Assange was incarcerated in Great Britain
It’s been close to 12 years.
Chicago cops fired 96 shots in 41 seconds and killed Dexter Reed, a black man, after pulling him over for failing to wear a seatbelt.
Is this the one that LOTT shared video of opening fire on the cops before they did?
Yes. He fired shots at the CPD first, before they sent a hail of bullets his way. Boehm is disingenuous by not sharing the whole story.
At this point he's either malicious or simply incompetent and should not be employed at anything in journalism. Fortunately he's at Reason so Leftist propaganda is the narrative of the day every day.
Bohem is a shit sub human. I didn't see this comment, and still called it in a comment below.
He just wants the summer of love 2: Electric boogaloo.
And he doesn’t care how many people it kills.
It’s Jeffy level disingenuousness at this point.
But 21st century journalism is all about cherry-picking info to further standard partisan narratives, which either placate or anger the targeted echo chamber audience.
Sure but his chosen schtick fits in more at Salon than the purported principles of Reason.
He fired 11 times before cops fired one time.
Not quite true. He did fire multiple shots before cops returned fire though and probably a total of 11 including those fired after the cops returned fire.
A lot missing from this story, like why a tactical team had guns drawn over a seat belt violation and reports that the same group of cops detained the same perp for the same violation a month earlier.
One thing is clear. Dexter won a Darwin award.
When the Chicago Tribune immediately asks people to chill, you can probably figure it was a good shoot.
https://www.chicagotribune.com/2024/04/10/editorial-dexter-reed-police-shooting-copa-brandon-johnson/
Not a bad editorial. The shooting was justified, the stop may or may not have been. There is a fine but very distinct line between the two.
However, considering he had already been arrested recently for having an illegal weapon, the cops approaching with other officers covering them with drawn arms seems prudent, especially if last year police were shot or shot at an increasing amount of time.
"Disingenuous" my foot. It's a flat out lie by omission.
Mrs Lincoln enjoyed the play
up until Mr Lincoln was murdered.And unfortunately he’s too stupid to realize he’s actually doing real criminal justice reform a disservice. His dishonesty is so transparent that someone with an open mind sees it and gets turned off the whole issue.
he’s actually doing real criminal justice reform a disservice. His dishonesty is so transparent that someone with an open mind sees it and gets turned off the whole issue.
This is a good point. This is why I nitpick many people I agree in these comments with when their rhetoric is exaggerated or missing context.
But he did share the whole story.
The formula is simple: If they don’t mention that he was unarmed, you can assume he was. If they don’t mention race, you can assume not black.
Duh.
Is he upset the cops wasted too much ammo?
.45 ACP isn't that expensive. (pretend the word "that" is in italics, I don't know how to do italics on here)
I just put everything in "scare" quotes.
Fuck it. I know how to do it, but can't show you without it happening in the post. Thanks to Diane for showing me how (haven't seen her on in a long while).
Switched his/her handle to Rick James. Came by briefly a few days ago.
Yeah, his real handle is "Paul"--the Diane Reynolds thing was just a long-time goof after the Hillary emails were exposed and it came out that Chelsea Clinton was using that as a sockpuppet email name.
I feel like such an asshole for assuming gender. Point me to the nearest reeducation camp?
THANK YOU! I missed that whole thing and have long wondered. I guess I never heard the Chelsea Clinton part so there wasn't a 2 and 2 to put together.
I heard the name Diane Reynolds in a local newscast (Seattle) while driving and wondered who she was. Can’t recall what the story was about.
I miss Paul. I mean Rick. Hope he comes back.
>>Diane for showing me how (haven’t seen her on in a long while).
Rick James now.
It's "Rick James now, bitch!"
cocaine is a helluva drug.
You need to start with the "<" symbol.
Then put a "i". Then put ">".
Then type your italicized words. Then close it with another "<".
Then put "/i". Then put another ">".
Use "b" for bold and "s" for strikethrough.
Then there’s “blockquote” done the same way.
Did you have to go to glibertarians to get this like sarc?
No, I got it from Paul and from looking at the page source code.
I have not been able to close blockquotes for weeks and have had to resort to using them only at the end of a post.
To close blockquotes properly, you need to have text, your blockquote, then more text. If you don’t have text prior to your blockquote, the quote will not close properly.
blockquote
Blockquote
Thank you
Thank you
Thank youCurious as to why you saved the last "thank you" as the one to be struck through. Are you not really thankful?
Tested in order of instruction. i then b then s.
I don't do algebra.
SJWs thank you.
Google: html tag italics
https://twitter.com/CWBChicago/status/1777716822394978553
Americans are still not worried enough about the threat of global war.
Why worry with the steady hand of SleepyJoe at the helm?
Why worry when you can doordash nuclear hellfire?
Remember....he is in the 20th Century.
The rest of ain't, but he is.
The reauthorization of a warrantless electronic surveillance tool hit a snag in the House on Wednesday
Aren't you the peice of shit sub human that pushed to vote for the party that wants warentless survalence?
Yes, Boehm did, strategically and reluctantly.
Yes. Yes he did.
Sarc was assuring us yesterday that Trump being against it is purely accidental. So just as bad as the dems and neocons that don't want to require warrants.
Would that be either party.
The P.A.T.R.I.O.T. Act placed us on this this path.
Yeah, sometimes both sides really are the same.
We have been told to beware politics and power. It wasn't beware the republicans, beware the democrats, beware the whigs or whatever. It's was the understanding of human nature, power, and how politics manipulates society to control. That is why government must be limited.
USPS proposes raising the prices of 1st class stamps
Inflation is a myth, spittin' tabaccy, rig count, gold prices and chocolate diseases prove it's not real.
USPS is just greedy.
Lizzie Warren should say something.
Lizzie Warren took an axe and gave the Constitution 40 whacks. When Sanders saw what she had done he gave another 41.
I've noticed lately there's less mail in the envelopes. More shrinkflation.
I had an order from AliExpress that came from one of their US based warehouses be delivered by Amazon. Even the Chinese are avoiding USPS.
Bought a few rolls of forever stamps about 5 years ago, figured it was a lifetime supply at the time, given how few things I send via USPS anymore. Five years later, send fewer things than ever. Will probably die with a few rolls in stock. Can pass them down...
Only the Federal Government can come up with: we’re losing money because we have lost costumers to our competition who provides better service, cheaper. I have an idea to correct this, let’s raise the price of our services more .
Then again, this is the same government that thinks we can have more daylight by changing the clocks twice a year.
Had to try the italics thing out. Screwed it up the first time. Now the question is, will I utilize it enough to remember next time or not? Eh.
Yeah, I keep a text file on my desktop with examples of italics, bold, and hyperlinks. I wouldn't have a prayer of remembering.
Pfffft. Who uses snail mail anymore? Just eat your cheesy poofs and quit yer bitchin’.
could actually be a net negative for federal revenue too.
And this is bad why?
This almost makes the rest of the shitty tariff plan sound ok.
While hiking in Shenandoah National Park last weekend...
I was hoping this was going to be in the form of a Thomas Friedman column template.
If the article isn't bohem whent hiking and never came back the world would be better
Dear Penthouse,
I never thought this could happen to me. While hiking in the Shenandoah National Park Last Weekend ..
Married ISIS couple who 'raped two Yazidi slave girls aged 12 and FIVE and would punish them with a broomstick or scalding hot water' are arrested in Germany
But I bet their food truck was the best.
Immigration is terrible because some immigrants do bad things. Got it.
Now you are catching on.
Notice how Jeffy dances around the fact that they entered the country illegally, but were allowed to stay.
They're just torturing and enslaving minors that Americans are just not willing to do, amirite?
We should generalize about all immigrants based on the example above of an immigrant couple doing awful things. Better safe than sorry. Keep them all out because we have no idea which one is going to start a food truck and which one is going to rape a 5 year old. Is that it?
You are a simple minded fool.
You're right. None of them are going to start food trucks, they all rape 5-year-olds.
The story is about these two monsters. You conflated it into something else.
He usually does. You were far too kind in calling him a “simple minded fool”. He’s a disingenuous jackass.
And a propagandizing fascist politruk. Jeff is far worse than just a simple minded fool.
You and sarc are the ones who generalize that they are hard working and a net benefit. Always discounting anyone who points out your false narratives as false.
No no no, migration is always a negative. I know this because FAIR told me so, and all of the studies and data which contradict FAIR are false because they come from left-wingers.
Fucking hilarious. The first ad hominem!
Thank you for proving my assertions below jeff.
What is false about their data? Which studies have I discounted?
Lol.
The Foundation Against Intolerance and Racism or the Fairness & Accuracy In Reporting?
They’re both proggy as fuck so I’m not sure what you are whinging about.
Also interesting that your using the same tactic on this “FAIR”, that you’re simultaneously complaining about being used against your agitprop. If hypocrisy was a medal event you’d always take gold.
example #298734 of your dishonesty: you know damn well what FAIR means, it is the same anti-immigration organization that Jesse cites all the time. you posted your comment only so you could later claim "omg chemjeff cited some left-wing organization" which you KNOW to be a lie, only to smear me.
So double down with an ad hominem attack, don't dispute their data that is derived from government data. Claim others are being dishonest.
Like I pointed out, he was doing exactly what he was accusing others of doing... in his fucking accusation.
He's an incredible piece of work.
The other purpose of that comment is to reinforce what those who have you on mute believe. They'll see that post and assume that that's what you were writing about. A lot of the lies in the replies are performance for haters.
“you know damn well what FAIR means”
No. I don’t know “FAIR” is, you fucking goosestepping Nazi. Did you actually think we’re like you, with a big list of all the latest talking-points and sources?
“A lot of the lies in the replies are performance for haters”
Go fuck yourself you pathetic drunken suckhole. You just want to make a pal, and don’t have the faintest clue what the fat Nazi is talking about either.
Said no one.
We know they tend to bankrupt cities when they go there.
Pretty consistently to boot.
The increase in crime is just ONE of many reasons to end the nonsense.
Wait, I thought this was about illegal immigrants, not Democrats.
Well, as this conversation is demonstrating, apparently it's the immigrants who are bankrupting cities, not Democrats.
It’s actually democrats giving tax payer money to illegal immigrants, as well as other stupid and corrupt shit they’re doing.
That’s what you did, Lying Jeffy.
Actually, using the modern logic of risk aversion common among US liberals, then yes. Preventing harm is the most important thing, so ban immigrants.
"If it saves just one life."
It is a stupid standard but it wouldn't surprise me if this was just one more thing that the modern right has adopted from the left.
You’re so close to getting it.
Not likely.
Some immigrants are bad which means all immigrants are bad. Why aren't you committing the fallacy of composition? Don't you know that fallacies are the most effective arguments in these comments?
Don't worry, I am sure the ad hominem fallacy will be along shortly.
Oh, you poor things.
They're not "poor", one's a troll and the other is a fascist propagandist.
Claim someone is a hypocrite and you prove that they are wrong as a person, thus it follows that everything they say is wrong. Fallacies are TRUTH.
The funny part is that they rail against post-modernism, while implicitly accepting one of the primary tenets of post-modernism: that there is no such thing as objective truth, instead truth is socially constructed. No amount of facts or logic or reason can pierce their social bubble in which "their truth" has been socially constructed.
Lol. This is the bullshit sarc has joined.
The people denying objective facts constantly are you two.
Just like yesterday when you continued to deny lab leak evidence and WPATH false information.
He sneaks back in at night and tries to backtrack his fallacies. It is hilarious.
The people denying objective facts constantly are you two.
"In 2020, Biden campaigned on supporting the Green New Deal."
True or False, Jesse?
"The 2020 election was stolen and Trump was the rightful winner."
True or False, Jesse?
"The migrants flown to Martha's Vineyard were illegal immigrants."
True or False, Jesse?
"Jeff the Chemist wouldn't know an honest argument if it bit him in the ass?"
True or False, Jesse?
Oh definitely true.
True.
Ahh the projection i mentioned.
Like you and sarc do whenever I bring up the statistics on welfare usage as seen here?
https://reason.com/2024/03/09/the-future-of-immigration-is-privatization/?comments=true#comment-10479818
This dishonesty of these two morons is legion.
You’ve made no factual arguments you dishonest fuck.
If I presented data and statistics, would you actually read it, with an open mind? I don't think so. Whenever you are presented data that contradicts your narrative, you either nitpick it to death, or you dismiss it because it comes from supposedly left-wingers, or make some generalized claim about "well they are all corrupt scientists" or somesuch. That is exactly what you did during the pandemic whenever I or others would present papers that contradicted your narrative about the virus, masks, vaccines, any of it. The papers that supported your narrative were held up as the gold standards of truth, but the papers that contradicted your narrative were trashed and dismissed.
So it's a waste of time, I believe. But, if you are going to actually read and consider data and statistics with an open mind that contradict your narrative, then I will post something for you to consider.
We’ve presented you with plenty of data and statistics for many things here, yet you dismiss them out of hand. Now you want to present your, most likely majorly skewed, data and statistics and then ask us to have “an open mind” after how you constantly dismiss our data?
So I'll take that as a "no". As I thought. Remain in your little bubble then.
I’m still not seeing you present any data. What are you scared about?
If I remember correctly the last time you presented data it was the study showing immigrants (combining illegal and legal which is dishonest) being net positive to tax paying over a decade after entering the country. So your own data showed they were a net drain for a decade, at the costs of 10s of billions a year, for a small net benefit in maybe a decade. Of course if you took the integration of the data they aren’t a net positive for multiple decades.
Again this was your data. Which is why I love when you post data to show how dumb it is.
You demand taxpayers pay how for a possible future benefit. While claiming there is never a cost. Socially or economically. Because you can’t.
Watching dem run cities finally admit to this must have hurt you pretty badly.
You will have to provide a citation to the anecdote that you are describing to refresh my memory on specifically what the claims were.
While claiming there is never a cost.
THIS is a lie. I have never claimed this, nor has anyone else here ever claimed this. This is why it's a waste of time talking about these things with you. At the end of the day, it doesn't matter, you just lie about what I say anyway.
Lying Jeffy wants you to agree to accept his data before he posts it, lol.
Lying Jeffy wants you to agree to accept his data before he posts it, lol.
^This right here.
Why don't you provide your actual data jeff. Sorry to remove the one you were likely to provide. Scramble for another. Marxist sites have a ton of manipulated data "studies" to choose from.
THIS is a lie. I have never claimed this, nor has anyone else here ever claimed this. This is why it’s a waste of time talking about these things with you. At the end of the day, it doesn’t matter, you just lie about what I say anyway.
Yup. He knows it’s a lie, and he’ll be making the same claim tomorrow knowing it’s a lie. He’s got a slew of boilerplate lies that he throws out there every single day. Some like ML and ICP know they’re lies but play along because they’re shitty people. Others like Big Mac and Dlam are just plain dumb and believe the stuff to be true.
You should “mute” him I suppose.
WE WANT THE LIST!
Maybe Open Borders advocates shouldn’t only focus on the perceived positives while calling everyone that even tries to say “can we slow it down” or “there are negatives and they do cost taxpayer money” a xenophobic racist?
Just a thought.
Or maybe they’re shitty people too. Im not curious enough to unmute their sorry asses.
How does it feel to be ignored? I DON’T CARE! HA HA HA!
Awe, poor sarc.
Pour Sarc.
You know he won't read or consider anything you offer because it's from someone he hates. He judges people, not ideas or facts. Because he hates you, everything you say is to be opposed. Veracity is of no concern to him because he doesn't argue with people about ideas, nor does he care about right, wrong, fact or fiction.
He argues against people to score points with other people.
Well yeah, I know. ITL is the same way. They aren't going to read or consider anything with an open mind that is outside of their bubble.
It's called arguing in bad faith.
Which is what you two knuckleheads live for. Examples for you sarc. Showing youre projecting here.
sarcasmic 3 months ago
Flag Comment
Mute User
I’m saying that some people are so despicable that I’d rather disagree with them then have something in common with them.
sarcasmic 2 months ago
Flag Comment
Mute User
Yes, you are a despicable person who makes it very difficult to agree with anything you say because that would mean being like you.
Funny how you two always project your own behaviors. Lol.
Just yesterday he admitted even if Trump does the right thing he’ll be against it.
It is amazing watching you two collaborate on lies when it is you two who share these behaviors you attempt to project.
Why do you do that jeff? Want evidence?
Your idea of us having “an open mind” is to swallow your baloney hook, line, and sinker with no questions asked and full agreement with you. If you think that’s going to happen, you’re commenting in the wrong place. Try Reddit instead.
No, it means not dismissing it for one of your typical bullshit reason of "it's from left-wingers" or "it's from globalists/Soros/Davos" or crap like that.
And when we rip it apart, you whine just the same, Jeff, and claim we’re doing it for the reasons you list. Even if we post and link contradictory evidence.
Jeff, you literally blast anything Jesse or ITL or Chuck post as “right-wing” and dismiss it out of hand. So maybe don’t throw that stone in your glass house.
They actually do read your links, that’s how they’re able to quote them….
Do you two just lie and commit fallacies for fun?
One of my favorite things to do is read your evidence to expose it.
From Jeff's dark Brandon article yo shrike always being disproven by his own links.
Meanwhile I have posts from you literally saying you won't click links being provided to you lol.
sarcasmic 2 months ago
Flag Comment
Mute User
I don’t consider links from you guys to be information. I’ve clicked a couple and never found them useful. It has to be from, or confirmed by, someone other than a raving right-wing lunatic for me to give it consideration.
*shrug*
So pure projection.
But to people like you and Jeff who so dishonest you always accuse others of what you yourselves are doing.
I love reading yours and shrikes data as it is generally easy to refute with your own data let alone data i provide.
But thank you for admitting you dont bother actually presenting data, just narratives.
LOL you contradict yourself in the same comment:
I love reading yours and shrikes data
thank you for admitting you dont bother actually presenting data
Your reading comprehension is abysmal.
I haven’t seen you post data in ages jeff. Because of actions taken when you actually do.
What is confusing?
It seems as though you don't have much confidence in your data and facts. Otherwise you would post it and let it stand to criticism. You're responding to Jesse, but everyone can read the exchange. So even if you don't think Jesse is "open-minded" enough, he would not be the only one reading your data if you presented it.
Saying that you won't post it because Jesse will unfairly shoot it down is a cop out. Besides, everyone is biased. The best we can do is recognize that and try to control for it. If your data is that good, what does it matter if another commenter blasts it for bad reasons? Other readers/commenters will be able to see how great a point you have, supported by sufficient evidence, and perhaps you will convince them.
Or maybe you don't think your evidence is very convincing, so you preemptively come out with an objection to doing so to avoid posting it and having it fail on the merits.
It takes time and effort to gather up all this stuff, and believe it or not I have other things to do with my day than post here all day. I'm not going to spend an hour on a mission that is futile.
Lol, you’ve spent more time crying about why you won’t present it than it would take to actually present it.
You’re so transparent Lying Jeffy.
and believe it or not I have other things to do with my day than post here all day.
He says after posting all day.
You've spent hours this morning. If you're so firm in your convictions you would know where to get your data. You are not. You would spend time scrambling to find data for your bald assertions.
Meanwhile half your time is spent here dismissing data that is provided. Often with an ad hominem attack or other hand waive of the data.
Jeff cop out. ^
It takes time and effort to gather up all this stuff, and believe it or not I have other things to do with my day than post here all day.
Maybe with a little less time and effort, you could manage never to post here again.
If your data is that good, what does it matter if another commenter blasts it for bad reasons?
Are you new here?
So in the past, I have provided statistics and data to make a point.
The inevitable response was generally something like:
"I ignored all of your work except that I did note that you did not cite any of the statistics that *I* think are important, therefore it is all garbage."
So basically they demand a thesis-level type of argument and then they are going to dismiss it anyway. Who wants to write a thesis only to see it thrown in the dustbin?
You post on here all the time. There's nothing wrong with that, but claiming it takes too much time to demonstrate your claims is another cop out.
As I said, bolstering your argument with evidence is not primarily about convincing commenters you believe will unjustly dismiss it. It's to convince others who are open to the evidence who are reading the conversation, perhaps not even commenting. And, if you are properly "open-minded" you should be open to having your mind changed. I see you repeatedly doing what you accuse others of doing, specifically dismissing evidence that counters your point because you don't like or don't trust the source. Some sources aren't as credible as others, but it's better to put it out there and let it stand criticism than just dismiss the idea of backing up your positions with evidence.
More time spent not posting evidence…
To be fair, he did post two sources below. I've read the first and replied, but haven't had a chance to read the second. I wasn't terribly impressed with the first one, but I made a good-faith response to it.
The inevitable response was generally something like:
If that is true then post some evidence, fuckwit. You repeat this same fucking lie all the time. I posted evidence yesterday and you fallaciously displayed the exact behavior you are now assigning to others.
Cite?
Everything Is So Terrible And Unfair, Jeff.
Here you go:
Here is one example.
https://www.imf.org/en/Blogs/Articles/2020/06/19/blog-weo-chapter4-migration-to-advanced-economies-can-raise-growth
There we go, a positive benefit to migration.
Now the usual suspects are going to claim:
"It's from the IMF and they are globalists therefore it's all garbage."
"Why don't they talk about the closing of hospitals in Arizona? Everyone knows that is THE MOST IMPORTANT IMMIGRATION ISSUE EVER" (this argument will be presented by you know who from AZ)
"I don't understand their statistics therefore it is all wrong and lies."
Specifically, we show that a 1 percentage point increase in the inflow of immigrants relative to total employment increases output by almost 1 percent by the fifth year.
So it takes five years for the productivity relative to the increased number of workers (including the new immigrants) to break even? Does that mean it reduces net productivity relative to the workforce for the first four years?
(I'm still reading the rest of the article, but this jumped out to me. It also doesn't seem to distinguish between legal and illegal immigrants, which I think is important. I would think legal immigrants, who are often more highly skilled and productive compared to illegal immigrants, would likely be a net positive. Illegal, often unskilled, immigrants would have the opposite effect, IMO.)
He was schooled for hours the other day in how dishonest it is to not separate illegal/legal issues and then posts the same garbage.
It is the same Marxist tactic the MSM uses: tell the lie until it becomes the truth.
Oh, I know. I have been reading the comments for years now, and have seen him fail to distinguish the two. Even the few times he will, he'll claim that all of the current illegal aliens aren't illegal, since they're seeking asylum, despite the reality that the VAST majority are really here for economic reasons. But they said the magic word, "asylum," which NGOs have instructed them to say so they can stay, and that negates the reality of them coming for economic opportunities.
I was trying to engage him on the source he did provide, as it even seemed to indicate that immigration as a whole isn't even a net benefit for at least five years, according to his own source, which lumps all immigrants together into one category. I'm sure if it isolated illegal immigrants only, the timeframe for having a net positive effect on productivity would take much, much longer, if it ever came to a positive. Though it's much harder to get accurate data for just illegal immigrants, for obvious reasons.
Didn’t I just accuse Jeff of using a similar study using the same criticisms as he posted. Lol.
It also correlates the 5 year growth as caused by the immigration instead of correlated. Of course there is constantly an influx of new workers from population growth domestically as well. Plus production increases that historically have been above these estimates through efficiency gains.
The study is largely parsing data to try to find a correlation without much discussion on causation.
So it takes five years for the productivity relative to the increased number of workers (including the new immigrants) to break even? Does that mean it reduces net productivity relative to the workforce for the first four years?
I don't think that is what they are saying. I think they simply used 1 year and 5 years as their time points for projecting the impact on migration in the future based on their model. If you look at Figure 4.17 in the report, all of the indicators show a positive effect even after just 1 year (just not up to 1%).
It is literally what they are doing. Assuming some point in the future there will be a gain. However it is devoid of actual links to causation as I already discussed.
This is much different than using rates of welfare and social programs YEARLY based on YEARLY data. It is no better than a bald hypothetical. It is similar to how your old defend Keyensian economics having a ratio greater than 1.
It also avoids the cost. Just like GPD includes government spending. Another reason you and shrike love that metric.
Oddly enough your analysis has flaws. A) from 2019 before the surge so you are assuming the growth is linear. B) it discusses output or revenues so doesn't touch on the costs associated with the output.
More people come into the country, more food has to be produced. Amazing claim. Doesnt even touch on if taxpayer funds are used to pay for this increase.
The assumptions in that article of continued linear growth assumptions is just bad economics. Certain products like housing can't grow at the influx rate, meaning it just adds to inflationary costs.
This is why I love when you post data. It is often built on bad foundations.
He's bemoaning that commenters just dismiss his evidence outright for fallacious reasons like the ad hominem fallacy. I replied a while ago to the first article he posted, taking the claims on, but he hasn't responded. True, he could be busy and just hasn't had the chance yet. But it's been a while and he's made other posts since.
You too have given a good-faith effort to tackle the points made in the article, without resorting to any fallacies or juvenile behavior, and he hasn't responded to you, either--though you only posted it a little while ago, to be fair.
He isn't required to respond to anyone, but, if his complaints about people not reading his sources and arguing it on the merits were true, I'd think he'd respond when someone does just what he asked for.
See, there we go. This is a study which has a specific question to test and a specific model used to address that question. It's not trying to answer every question associated with migration. So you bringing up these other points about what this study didn't do, is just a red herring.
A) from 2019 before the surge so you are assuming the growth is linear.
Proof you didn't read it. It didn't assume anything about any growth. This study was specifically about trying to assess the impact on an economy after a "migration surge", where a large number of migrants come at once.
B) it discusses output or revenues so doesn’t touch on the costs associated with the output.
More people come into the country, more food has to be produced.
These are both bad faith criticisms as I mentioned above. I predict that if I do try to find some study about the impact of migration on food output, you will just move on to the next red herring of "oh yeah? well what about water consumption or traffic congestion? what a terrible study!"
Yes jeff. That is my explicit issue. It tests a model. The model is built on assumptions. The assumptions drive the model. It is not based on hindsight data analysis. Just a handful of the assumption used are the ones I criticized.
Meanwhile you continue to use ad hominem attacks on actual hindsight analysis of known numbers.
As George Box states, all models are wrong, some are useful.
Economic models with bad assumptions will always produce the result the designer wants. That is again why I pointed to the correlation action and not the causation action.
Economost assumes there is a benefit so the models shows a benefit. The exact same as the use of the Keyes multiplier for Keeneland economics which has been thoroughly refuted in hindsight analysis time and time again.
Your evidence is bald. The evidence I present is repeatable and easily analyzed by anyone who cares.
Here is another example:
https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2001/01/2001a_bpea_borjas.pdf
And it has the additional benefit of being from Borjas, the leading economist skeptical of immigration.
I argue that immigration greases the wheels of the labor market by injecting into the economy a group of persons who are very responsive to regional differences in economic opportunities.
The basic idea seems to be, that as a group immigrants are more mobile than native-born citizens, so they are more willing to move to where the economic opportunities are, and in so doing, they provide additional economic opportunities to those purchasing their services at a lower cost than they would have had to pay otherwise in a less efficient labor market.
Will you cry if I point out this is over 20 years old? Maybe a few things have changed over that time?
I appreciate you providing a second source for your arguments, but I just don't have time to read 66 pages now. I too am at work and read Reason and the comments in my down time, but there is no way I can get through 66 pages in my down time. Can you summarize the gist of it for me?
I did "summarize the gist of it" above.
It’s 20 years old.
It’s 20 years old.
And irrelevant to the discussion of the day.
Let's say it's true, and there are workers needed for an industry in the midwest, for example. Sure, immigrants might be more willing to uproot to take those jobs. But why is there such a dearth of American-born people to fill those positions? Could it have anything to do with the welfare-state incentives not to be productive for native-born Americans? Why not fight to end the welfare state before making the country open-borders? And in this instance, I'm talking about the welfare state for Americans, without regard to whether the immigrants (both legal and illegal) are receiving welfare benefits at all.
When you factor in the generous benefits (housing and food allowances, etc.) that migrants get in some areas, like New York, this study saying they would be more likely to uproot and go to where the jobs are seems not to be true now at least. They will stay at the city that is giving them the most free stuff.
There is also the example of Tyson Foods advertising that they will hire thousands of illegal immigrants to replace the Americans they already have working there, since the pay would be $2 an hour less for the immigrants. That certainly will benefit Tyson and the immigrants hired, but isn't good for the American workers who would now be without a job. Yes, many of them will find other employment eventually, but it will certainly be a hardship for them. I see no reason why America needs to prioritize the wellbeing of non-Americans. This isn't an example of a company just not being able to find American workers so they are forced to hire immigrants--illegal or legal.
In my libertopia, we wouldn't have any welfare programs (you would be free to voluntarily help anyone in need you felt was worthy, though), property rights would be enforced, and a company would be able to hire anyone for any agreed upon salary. We don't live in my libertopia, though, so illegal immigration is becoming a huge problem for this country.
But why is there such a dearth of American-born people to fill those positions? Could it have anything to do with the welfare-state incentives not to be productive for native-born Americans?
Sure, it could. It could also be because migrants, as relative newcomers, haven't established as deep social and family connections with a particular geographic area as most native-born citizens have, and are more willing to move.
Why not fight to end the welfare state before making the country open-borders?
Embrace the power of and.
(and, "open borders" is a misnomer; virtually no one supports literal "open borders", I do not anyway.)
They will stay at the city that is giving them the most free stuff.
IF you assume that they would rather get "free stuff" instead of working for themselves.
I see no reason why America needs to prioritize the wellbeing of non-Americans.
What do you mean precisely by "America" here? The government? Companies based in America? Individual American citizens? I think that the government should, #1, protect and defend the natural rights of *everyone*, not just citizens, and #2, make sure to enforce the civil rights associated with citizenship, such as voting or serving on a jury. If the government wants to give preference to citizens when it comes to hiring for government jobs, that's fine. But I don't think the government should be enforcing that preference onto every American business. It should be up to each business to decide how best to meet their labor needs. That after all is part of *their* natural right of association. If individuals want to try to persuade a particular business why it should hire only American workers, they are free to do so, that is a part of *their* right of speech and association.
The basic idea seems to be, that as a group immigrants are more mobile than native-born citizens, so they are more willing to move to where the economic opportunities are, and in so doing, they provide additional economic opportunities to those purchasing their services at a lower cost than they would have had to pay otherwise in a less efficient labor market.
Which is completely irrelevant to the discussion at hand about the cost of illegal immigrants and refugees.
Did you think nobody would realize that you were moving the goalposts?
Per the 2017 Community Survey > 40% of American adults reside in a state other than they were born in. Of course this data has some caveats, when used as a proxy for worker mobility (e.g. I was born in California because my Dad was stationed at Ft Ord, and my oldest son was born in Spokane but we resided in Coeur d'Alene at the time and none of my children were born in Montana but the younger two have spent more time in Montana than other states) but even with these caveats it seems the US population is willing to relocate. History also suggests this. My Mom's father family arrived as indentured servants in the early 18th century and seemed to be constantly moving west with each successive generation. My father was born in South Dakota (actually just across the Minnesota border) but his family moved to Idaho when he was 13 because my Grandpa found a better job.
And the story of my Maternal Grandfather's family is far from unique, especially among the Scots-Irish.
Also, at no point between 1801 and the closing of the American frontier, was the population of American settlers ever even close to half foreign born. In fact, the majority of immigrants tended to stay within short distances of the major urban areas they entered the country through the end of the second world war.
Furthermore, in 1940, fifty percent of the country resided on a farm or ranch. It's about 1% today. That's nearly a five thousand percent decrease in eighty years. That population obviously went somewhere.
One final point, even today, the vast majority of immigrants (legal or otherwise) remain in the state they first immigrated to. All of this suggest any study saying immigrants are more likely to move to areas outside the state they first immigrated to, than native born Americans is strongly suspect.
soldiermedic76, my father was also stationed at Ft. Ord when I was young. From 1986-1989, I believe. Small world. My sisters and I didn't like it because it rarely got warm enough to go swimming--though it rarely got cold too.
My Dad was their 75-79. His brother in law, my uncle was there 89 until it closed.
So an opinion piece?
He’s giggling because he made you dance like a monkey.
When you respond to his lies you are his dancing monkey.
You’re making an effort to refute someone who will never admit that you are right, will never admit to being wrong, will always repeat lies, will never admit to telling lies, and is looked up to by trolls who wish they could be master baiters like him.
Mute the fucker. Watch him squirm. Granted it will be less interesting not defending yourself from things you never said, but watching him desperately pile replies onto all of your posts in a plea for attention is funny is a stupid kind of way.
"Mute the fucker. Watch him squirm."
You actually believe this is how people react?
It is how he reacts. With sarc it is always projection.
Yeah, the only person I remember ever throwing a tantrum was sarc when Ken muted him.
Dance monkey! Dance! Be Jesse's dancing monkey!
Sober up, dude.
Number 1 on your list with a bullet =D
Why are you dehumanizing him? I thought using dehumanizing language was dangerous. You constantly accuse Trump of that, so I figured you wouldn't continue to resort to that type of thing. I guess I'm wrong.
"but everyone can read the exchange. "
It feels like some users on this site don't understand that. Also, that everyone can see what they posted yesterday (or the day before).
No, that’s your fallacy of what others say. Stop twisting their words for your agenda.
Unlike those of you with "Illegal Immigrant Hunting Permit" stickers on your trucks, I don't have an agenda.
Ok, Strawcastic.
“Bumper sticker”. LOL
Unlike those of you with “Illegal Immigrant Hunting Permit” stickers
lol, okay
How it started: jeff and sarc accuse everyone of using fallacies.
How it is going: sarc and Jeff use only fallacies.
I see this sticker and other variations all the time.
https://www.militariapress.com/product/RG1153.html
Yeah, for sale online, not on a bumper.
A quick search could not turn up a single image of this bumper sticker on a vehicle on the road.
I see this sticker and other variations all the time.
In your dreams, Buttercup.
Dissemble, deflect, distract.
I kinda suspected that.
Doesn't Sarc live in rural Maine? How many cars does he see on the road regularly? It seems rather dubious that he sees this bumper sticker on cars all the time. Small population means fewer cars X percentage of Maine drivers who are vehemently opposed to illegal immigration (I'm sure there are some, but this isn't a border town in TX) X percentage that are so fed up by it they will buy this bumper sticker and put it on their cars publicly so everyone knows how strongly they feel = likely a VERY small percentage. I call bullshit.
Most of sarcs personal anecdotes are utter bullshit.
I was just showing logically why it appears to be bullshit.
Add this to the list of your fake anecdotes.
Honk honk!
Clown show time. Honk honk sarc!
Look how quickly jeff and sarc resort to strawman arguments. Nobody is using the word all.
Ironically both jeff and sarc also dismiss data and facts about aggregate coats with ad hominem attacks.
But they will always go to strawman to accuse others with their own argument style.
Nobody is using the word all.
You are right! Nobody is using the word "all"! It is just a huge coincidence that every anecdotal story about immigrants that you cite describes ones that are behaving badly, every set of statistics that you cite about immigrants show immigrants in a negative light. But you are right, nobody used the word "all".
Lots of people have made positive comments about Elon Musk. Does that count?
Don’t forget all the immigrant CEO’s. (Weren’t CEO’s the bad guys not too long ago?)
Some immigrants
Not 'some'.
ILLEGAL immgrants are bad.
ALL of them. Because they came here ILLEGALLY
Simple. Just like you two.
We have to ignore negative externalities of mass migration because your marxist sources said it was always net profit.
No no no. We have to ignore the positive benefits of mass migration because they don’t exist. All migration is negative.
When are you and sarc going to actually provide the data? Because all you’ve done for the last year is dismiss the actual data with ad hominem attacks.
How many articles have I provided regarding their welfare use, benefit use, and costs? How many have you provided? Lol.
This exactly proves you simply ignore costs.
Explains why cities that get them beg it to stop.
Because it is too beneficial for said cities.
NYC has certainly THRIVED with mass illegals (not nearly as mass as border states, mind you). Denver? KILLING IT! LA? Certainly no problems there.
"Desantis and Abbott turned them into nazis with their political stunt"
-Jeff
All immigrants are now CEO’s of major corporations.
See? It’s easy to do.
No no no. We have to ignore the positive benefits of mass migration because they don’t exist. All migration is negative.
Fatass piece of shit who said keeping child molesters from claiming asylum is “reducing their liberty” deflects from two child rapists who claimed asylum.
Here’s an idea–how about taking these two monsters out back and beheading them?
In case you missed it, yesterday he admitted he thinks minors can consent.
And if not right away, then after a few weeks chained in a dark basement.
What, did he visit Pluggo’s house recently?
Migration includes both immigration and emigration by definition. In every single instance of mass migration in the US emigrants far surpassed immigrants in the migrant population. It's disingenuousness at its core to equate migration with immigration. Migration can be both a benefit and a detriment, depending upon the reason behind the migration, but, throughout US history, emigrants have always far surpassed immigrants in all major migration periods.
WTF do you mean by "emigrants far surpassed immigrants"? Do you even know what the words mean?
If you mean that emigrants from the USA exceeded immigrants to the USA, you are a total idiot. If you mean from other countries, every one emigrated from one country and to another country (except those that died on the ship), so mathematically the numbers are almost equal. But we call them immigrants when they come here.
""We have to ignore the positive benefits of mass migration because they don’t exist.""
Positive or negative benefits be damned. Follow the law.
I see lots of benefits from immigrants that followed the law.
I don't know of any benefits from MASS migration. I am seeing my State and City governments hemorrhaging tax payer dollars faster than they can collect over the current mass migration. I do clearly see negatives as they are in my face and my pocket. How long will it take the current round of mass migrants to be a net positive with the billions being spent in this state alone? And NYS has a relatively low number of migrants compared to what has entered.
Yeah, yeah. Sure, the budget issues are self inflicted by claiming to be a sanctuary city. I agree.
Well hold on, were they bad things? If a "child raising expert" came along and declared them to be good things, it would be ok, surely.
Jeff does love his appeal to authority even when the problems with those arguments are exposed. Because even when his chosen expert is wrong, they are actually right.
I mean if the expert says abusing the child is good and everyone agrees, it must be the right thing to do.
Are YOU a PHD in parent-child bludgeoning and affection relations?!?! Dr. Jesse Rogan?!?!
They came to a collective agreement.
such a silly argument. your argument presupposes that genuine, bona-fide experts will support any position on any topic, even ones that are demonstrably wrong.
chemically castrating a kid who is clearly delusional and cant consent to it doesn't meet this bar...weird
The standard of care, written by the experts, which I directly copy and pasted for you, does not say that surgical or chemical gender transition therapy is permissible by getting the consent of the child ONLY. So this is a strawman. You have a habit of this - you mischaracterize what the actual experts are saying, and then you use your mischaracterization to trash the experts.
"by getting the consent of the child ONLY."
This was never my accusation, nor the point at all.
The point is the munchy parents, the delusional kid, and "the experts" all agree in this scenario, that we should castrate the kid and infuse them with cross-sex hormones that will irreparably harm them.
The point is "everyone agrees" to the abuse, including the experts.
Try and keep up.
Ill ask you again, how far are we away from a democrat "pediatric sex expert" saying if the parents and child consent to sex, then who are we to stand in the way, and actually its a good thing. Why cant this be OK if we can castrate them. Will you be first in line to sign on to that expert?
But you're stealing a base by assuming it is abuse. It is no more "child abuse" than giving chemotherapy to a pediatric cancer patient.
You are just upset that the experts don't agree with your characterization of abuse. You want your policy choices ratified by experts, and when the experts disagree with your policy choices, you trash the experts instead of trying to re-examine why in good faith they disagree with you.
It is no more “child abuse” than giving chemotherapy to a pediatric cancer patient.
Comparing lifesaving treatment to peddling psychological nonsense that a healthy body should be altered to conform to a delusion that one was "born in the wrong body". There is absolutely zero justification for the medical intervention of transgender treatments for a child.
European studies over the last month show:
Double the suicide attempts post surgery.
Same suicidal behaviors for those who do and don't transition.
Average time being monitored by a psychiatrist until some procedure or drug under 10 hours.
95% of kids claiming gender issues transition to normal adult hood without being confused.
Well yeah, but were these studies done by “experts”, smart guy, hmmm?
One of these things is not like the other. One of these things is not the same.
Jeff’s displays his idiotic ideas for all to see.
**puke**
Normal adolescent growth and development are exactly the same as cancer. /Jeffy
Well when you're sexual proclivities lean towards the pre-pubescent body...
That's why they're so enthusiastic about puberty blockers.
Are you saying WPATH are still experts no matter how many if their studies are shown to be wrong? While ignoring all other studies from non WPATH authors? Didnt see the WPATH files where even their members admit their evidence and procedures are false for the most part? They are activists.
Lol. Jeffy boy, there should be no such thing as an “expert” in child transitioning, you fucking moron.
Most immigrants are ok. It’s illegals that are the problem. Or were you disingenuously attempting to conflate the two?
Children should be raped and beaten only with the approval of parents and slave owners in consultation with teachers and health professionals. You're not a libertarian if you think the state should intervene. /Jeffy
Children should be raised according to the wishes of their parents, except if the parents are left-wingers, then the parents are obviously unfit and suffering Munchausen syndrome or something, and so the moral titans of Ron DeSantis and Donald Trump should be telling them how to raise their kids.
/most of you here
Children should be raised according to the wishes of their parents, except if the parents want to do harm to their children.
Jeffy believes that poisoning children with puberty blockers and hormones and cutting their tits off is not harming them.
Now he’s comparing it to cancer treatment above. Such a disingenuous cunt.
Which is particularly interesting considering the WPATH files show doctors admitting that putting kids on hormone blockers for too long increased their risk of cancer and other physiological harms. Doctors like that zealot on Matt Walsh's documentary claiming that taking puberty blockers is just like hitting a "pause button" are a big reason the "experts" have little credibility these days.
Too many institutions have been fully captured to just blame this on munchie parents. A parent can still be responsible, get second and third opinions, do their own independent research, and never see the red flags because of the manufactured narratives, which are used to beat them over the head with appeals to authority--or even more maliciously, asking them "Do you want a dead son or an alive daughter?" to manipulate them into the preferred ideological choice.
Doctors telling parents "Give us all this money to mutilate your kids or they will kill themselves" has been a significant driver of this social contagion, not just parents expecting to have smoke blown up their ass when they announce their kid is a genderspecial, and be told how stunning and brave they are for fucking their kids up in an unfixable way.
Any physician who does this to a kid should be executed.
Anyone saying, “Give us all this money to mutilate your kids or they will kill themselves” is being dishonest about the rather high chance that when the mutilated kids grow up, they’ll kill themselves.
The end game of this is always to surgically remove their sex organs and build fake ones – and this is irreversible. They won’t be able to reproduce. They might be able to give a sex partner pleasure, but are likely to be unable to experience it themselves. They may have to take a cocktail of powerful hormones every day or their faked gender will unravel as some characteristics return to their genetic gender - but those hormones will reduce their life expectancy. If a trans person grows up and is deemed mentally and physically healthy enough, they may be able to adopt a new born, but they’ll never nurse it – either they never had the right organs, or they were cut off and discarded. Besides, if they could make milk, it would be toxic from the hormones they are taking.
Adults who knowingly consented to this often find they made a mistake – but they have to live with it or kill themselves. What are the chances when the choice was made by a teenager to whom the warnings were just words? (Assuming they even received the warnings from a surgeon trying to sell them on the procedure.) When the mutilated kid grows up and kills himself, did the counselors and surgeon commit felony murder?
"check out this week's edition of Elizabeth Nolan Brown's newsletter, Sex & Tech."
Sign me up!
What are her sandwhich recipes
Don't order the tuna.
If it smells fishy, it isn't fresh.
Seeing as it's a wapost article behind a pay wall and the picture of the guy appears to be a high school graduation photo I am going to assume reason, and wapo is hiding if he shot at the cops, was high etc.
The ‘kid’ was 26. They’re Trayvoning this.
He fired multiple shots first and even wounded one of the cops before they returned fire.
On Truth Social, Trump urged lawmakers to "KILL FISA" because it had been used to spy on his campaign.
That hot line to the Kremlin caught their attention, Donnie.
It's amazing how ignorant you are.
No, just dishonest. He knows otherwise.
Why do you think the FBI obtained a warrant? Because the Trump campaign was playing kissy-face with the Kremlin is the correct answer.
There are times when it is better to be silent and let people assume you're an idiot rather than typing and removing all of that doubt.
He can’t help himself.
turd lies. turd lies when he knows he’s lying. turd lies when we know he’s lying. turd lies when he knows that we know he’s lying.
turd lies. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit and a pederast besides.
Remember when Trump got caught on a hot mike, whispering to Medvedev that he would have more flexibility after the election?
That was trump, right?
Why do you think the FBI obtained a warrant?
The Durham report said political interference, which I know that you know, so why did you even try this argument?
He’s a lying piece of shit.
Fucking hilarious, dude. Are you now trying to Babylon Bee yourself?
He’s walking, talking satire in motion.
I would jump in on this, but you’ve already thoroughly humiliated yourself. You’re just too stupid to understand that.
You mean when one of the FIve Eyes countries setup George Papadopoulos by baiting him that the Russians had dirt on the Clintons in order to give pretext? When in reality it was a DNC lawyer buying unverified rumors from a Russian source via a former British agent?
I guess we’re still probing the abyssal depths of your stupidity, ignorance, and retardity.
To infinity and beyond!
That’s from Pluggz Dimyear.
turd, the ass-clown of the commentariat, lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit.
Just wondering how your “Don is a Putin puppet” theory works.
Before Trump was president, Putin invaded Ukraine.
While Trump was president, Putin did not invade Ukraine.
After Trump was president, Putin invaded Ukraine again.
So is Putin using Trump to control his own terrible impulses? Like when I set my alarm clock across the room to make sure that I have to get out of bed to turn it off, as opposed to just reaching over and hitting the snooze.
The primary enemy of the Russia/Syria/Iran axis is NATO.
By weakening NATO and nuking up Iran Donnie was playing to Vlad's inside straight.
Remember that the MAGA loyalty pyramid places Vlad at the top with Donnie nearby on his knees.
Having NATO improve their military capabilities helps Russia...how?
Can you elucidate for us Trump's role in Putin's Ukraine invasion circa 2014?
The primary enemy of the Russia/Syria/Iran axis is NATO.
Is that why your side constantly gives Iran the Danegeld?
You don't understand, giving Iran billions in badly needed hard currency actually weakens it somehow.
turd, the ass-clown of the commentariat, lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a TDS-addled lying pile of lefty shit.
"Remember that the MAGA loyalty pyramid "
Are you referencing an actual image of some sort or are you just being your normal schizo self?
Trump weakened NATO by demanding the NATO members increase their defense spending?
You’ve said a lot of stupid shit over the years.
This is one of them.
POST THE LIST!
LOL
What do you expect from a person who claims to be an anal appliance? When he says his head is up someone’s rear, believe him.
Nobody buys your bullshit, pedo.
For more on the fight over Section 702's reauthorization, check out this week's edition of Elizabeth Nolan Brown's newsletter,
You mean the article where she fucking blames Republicans for the hold up? JFC you people are evil Leftist ideologues. If there was a scintilla of libertarian orientation to your thought you'd support the hold up not blast it as evidence of chaos in the Republican party and the hold outs being the fucking bad guys.
Chicago cops fired 96 shots in 41 seconds and killed Dexter Reed, a black man, after pulling him over for failing to wear a seatbelt.
It's Chicago so I reserve the right to assume everyone involved was at fault until the facts say otherwise.
Forget it, Fist. It's Chicago.
We need to know the skin color of the cops before reaching any conclusions.
Haven’t you been paying attention?
Skin color of cops = white, it’s white supremacy
Skin color of cops = any other color, it’s also white supremacy
One of the officers shot was black.
Not any more, he’s not.
Waymo began offering driverless taxi rides in Los Angeles on Wednesday.
If ever the taxi that responds to my hail is driverless it will also be riderless.
Sounds like the dream tech future. No humans required.
As long as a government subsidizes it, who needs riders?
As long as the government can remotely lock the doors and deliver the rider to the re-education facility, it's all good.
Georgia cops are still hassling vape stores over legal products like delta-8 and delta-10.
Nowhere is it written that cops need to know the law.
1. everybody get home safe.
2. see 1
Americans are still not worried enough about the threat of global war.
Meh.
On Truth Social, Trump urged lawmakers to “KILL FISA” because it had been used to spy on his campaign.
Now we know why Trump pushed tax cuts during his term - because HE wanted to pay less in taxes.
How is paying less taxes a bad thing?
I'm trying to figure out his comparison here.
A group committing a violation of his rights against him is, somehow, comparable to taxes...how?
That's a hell of a pile of stupid wedged into 2 sentences. I love Jeffy getting straight to the point on this retarded take.
Everything Trump does is bad.
Something every libertarian should support
Truly, the most libertarian prez of our times
Since when was Jeffy a libertarian?
Not being a libertarian is the only thing Jeff’s been honest about... or was that Tony?
Jeff is a socialist libertarian. He actually used that term. He also used libertarian globalist.
Isn’t “libertarian globalist” kind of an oxymoron?
Like libertarian fascist.
No, just plain moron.
He’s definitely no individualist.
This, we know.
"Now we know why Trump pushed tax cuts during his term – because HE wanted to pay less in taxes."
Oh no. How awful.
I had to point out to Jeff the Chemist the other day that Trump is a fucking hero if Adam Smith is to be believed.
Poor Jeff.
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/14/business/economy/income-tax-cut.html
And
https://thehill.com/opinion/finance/584190-irs-data-prove-trump-tax-cuts-benefited-middle-working-class-americans-most/
But keep pushing your false narratives buddy.
I found out I was among the super rich when those tax cuts passed and my taxes went down!
Unfortunately I didn’t buy a private jet before inflation hit.
So green of you.
I’m the real hero here.
Pedo Jeffy, libertarian champion of tax hikes.
The horror.
BIDEN: "Elect me. I'm in the 20th Century."
Dude is on top of his game.
Remember how terrible Covfefe was? This is a small price to pay.
It was never about Covfefe. It was about the satisfaction of emoting hate. Covfefe was just a means to an end. These people have no issue with the mentally challenged being in the Whitehouse. But they do hate Trump.
Speaking of mentally unstable, it's quite possible both his stroke and his recent hospitalization reset something in Fetterman, he's starting to make a lot of sense.
One of the effects of dementia is thinking long term memories happened recently. So probably legit.
That's why Biden supports 18th Century power sources. He should look up "Horse Latitudes".
Some days Biden thinks he is FDR. Then he comes to his senses, and just tells stories about how he advised FDR on policy.
Biden's birth year (1942) is closer to the Lincoln administration (1865) than to his own administration's (2021).
A government-enabled monopoly is responsible for the loss of 17,000 kidney transplants in the U.S. every year.
WHERE'S MY GOVERNMENT KIDNEY?
Trump Media & Technology Group Corp. (DJT)
Follow
32.69
-1.57
Down over 50% since it began trading.
Fair value = $1.25/sh
turd, the TDS-addled ass-clown of the commentariat, lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit.
Wild price swings have never happened to any other stock after an IPO.
When will it swing to the upside?
Traded over $70 less than two weeks ago when it opened and has fallen daily since.
With over 70% short interest it has to bounce soon (temporary of course)
If I could predict the future, life would be grand.
turd lies. That's not a surprise to anyone who reads his constant stream of bullshit.
But it's becoming obvious that as Misek is too stupid to understand the concepts of "evidence" or "relevance", the concept of "honesty" is simply beyond turd's ken.
And if it rises next week like all IPO's do after an initial rise and subsequent fall? What will your narrative be then? How is this one's trajectory different from every IPO ever?
It actually doesn’t matter what the “narrative” is. If anything Buttplug is overselling DJT’s value. The company is literally worthless. It has far more debt than assets. It has no realistic revenue stream and there is no imaginable universe where that revenue stream could ever expand to approach covering its costs, let alone servicing its debt. The most charitable possible evaluation of it is that it’s a vehicle to bilk unsophisticated investors out of money before leaving them holding the (worthless) bag. The conspiratorial evaluation is that it’s a way to launder foreign government money into Trump’s pocket as a way of peddling influence, but there’s no direct evidence of that. So take your pick. Is it a scam to rip off poor Americans or a way to sell out his own country to a foreign power?
Scottish Police Overwhelmed by 8,000 Reports of "Hate Crime" in First Week of New Law
"Will Impact the Police Force's Ability to Deal With Actual Crimes"
It is a crime! Words and ideas are dangerous.
Now we get to see articles like “Hate Crime in Scotland Skyrockets! Up 3000% From Last Year!” Oh boy, I can’t wait.
What’s really funny here is that a large number of them were about First Minister Humza Yousef’s anti-white comments in a speech he made prior to the passage of the law.
But isn't a white guy criticizing a brown immigrant automatically "hate"?
A BBC reporter asked him about that and he handwaved it saying it was just the "far-right" doing it. That's a page right out of Justin Trudeau's playbook.
Whenever he get's caught fucking up he says only the far-right thinks it's bad and then walks away like he gave a coherent answer. But it works.
It works at least with official state media, and their echo chamber audience.
Of course, it’s worth noting that the last time Section 702 came up for reauthorization was in 2018—and Trump signed the bill to extend the spying authority without including any reforms.
That’s because it hadn’t been used on him yet. He only opposes it because he’s not in power. Like everything else Trump gets right, it is only a result of the right thing accidentally aligning with his narcissistic personal interests. Because his opposition is personal, not principled, you can be certain that he will change his mind the moment he thinks it will benefit him personally. And his deranged supporters will swear we were always at war with Eastasia.
So now sarc is in favor of it because Trump isn’t.
These are his principles.
"That’s because it hadn’t been used on him yet."
I realize that this is mostly trolling, but the little fuckweasel is trying to pretend that in 2018 we were aware that the FBI had misused it 200,000+ times for everything from spying on a candidates campaign contributors to parents PO'd at schoolboards, that it was known in 2018 that in the future the FBI and DHS would use it as partial justification for censoring and spying on citizens in social media, and that back in 2018 we knew the FBI was illegally spying on the Democrats political opponents.
You sure slayed that strawman.
The only pretenders here are the Trump defenders who pretend he does things out of principle instead of pure self interest.
Perhaps his interests align with the interests of many.
When did you settle on thinking saying Trump only accidentally does something as a valid defense?
I get you excuse liberal bad acts as good intentions, is this just the opposite side so you can dismiss anything good he does?
Talk about principles.
But principles are white privilege and get in the way of social justice.
So as usual, Sarc is all in with the democrats to destroy our rights, and ready to make up any bullshit his little pickled brain can come up with to attack Trump. Sarc is a good little doggie for his democrat masters.
I wonder if Sarc has put up a ‘Biden/Harris’ sign in front of his refrigerator box yet?
“he does things out of principle instead of pure self interest.”
It can be both. Do principles clash with self-interest 100% of the time? No of course not.
“You sure slayed that strawman.”
It’s not strawman to accuse you of doing exactly what you were doing.
It was used on his 2016 campaign team you retarded fuck.
Of course he will use it to help him lock up his opposition just like last time he was the fucking president. Can someone put up a counter on all the political prisoners Biden has had to free after Trump locked them up, or is that only a 2nd term deal?
Great takedown of an argument I didn't make. Bravo!
Poor sarc.
Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee tells schoolkids that moon is a ‘planet’ and ‘made up mostly of gas
“The sun is a mighty powerful heat, but it’s almost impossible to go near the sun. The moon is more manageable.” Fire hot. Yes Fry, fire indeed hot.
Does this tie into the sat article from earlier?
Gas? I thought it was made of cheese.
gas isn't made by cutting cheese?
Taking on Katanji Brown Jackson for lowest IQ affirmative action hire
Oh, Sheila Jackson wins for sure. KBJ knows what a woman is and made the political choice to pretend not to know. Dumb choice, but she does know what one is. Sheila Jackson on the other hand, I'm genuinely concerned she didn't know what the moon is made up of until someone pointed it out to her. Kamala Harris I can't get a read on. Is she genuinely a dumfuq or just a horrible public speaker? Hard to say.
Kamala is dumb as fuck, she blew her way to the top
And here I thought Kamala just sucked.
Nah, she went heels up.
She lezzed out for Willie Brown too.
Taking on Katanji Brown Jackson for lowest IQ affirmative action hire
Uncle Clarence a candidate.
turd lies when he knows he’s lying. turd lies when we know he’s lying. turd lies when he knows that we know he’s lying.
turd lies. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit and a pederast besides.
You just can’t help it, can you? You have this need to put your racism on display for all to clearly see.
Got to be a favorite masturbation fetish.
is freakishly something ...
"Uncle Clarence a candidate."
Starch that cone, Kleagle.
Pluggo showing off how much he hates black people. And considering that he’s a pedophile, it isn’t much of a stretch that he’s in the Klan. His socialist ideals are certainly in line with the Klan, and he already hates blacks.
She be an idiot.
The TDS-addled turd lies. turd lies when he knows he’s lying. turd lies when we know he’s lying. turd lies when he knows that we know he’s lying.
turd lies. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit and a pederast besides.
She's about even with your level of intelligence.
Jeff will be along to say that we are claiming that all representatives are stupid .
Jeff will be along to
sayimply that we are claiming that allrepresentativesblacks are stupid .Fixed it for you. Jeff the Chemist is a special kind of stupid.
Yes, that’s better.
See how the terrible legacy of slavery still keeps black people down!
or
Thank god a heroic minority voice can challenge oppressive colonial white "science"!
Here's a question that was on Are You Smarter Than a 5th Grader.
It was a first grade science question.
What is the closest star to the earth?
I don't think she would get that one either. But to be fair, surprising a lot of people don't.
This was the top Democrat on the House Science Committee’s space subcommittee. Other Democrats selected her for that post!
On Truth Social, Trump urged lawmakers to "KILL"
When will this madman and his violent rhetoric be stopped?
Did you hear what Trump SAID?!
Not even dog whistling anymore!
Pure hate speech.
"Chicago cops fired 96 shots in 41 seconds and killed Dexter Reed, a black man, after pulling him over for failing to wear a seatbelt."
...
how about...
"after being pulled over, failing to follow any commands, refusing to put his hands where he was told, and then opening fire on and shooting one of the police officers"
I was going to say cmon Liz you can do better, but should have known it was one of the lefty hacks
Yeah, it’s Eric “I’m as disingenuous as Jeffy” Boehm.
"The pigs should have just shot the gun out of his hand!"
-Someone on Reddit right now, probably
“Just wait it out until he runs out of ammo”, then give him a warning “.
Or call in the social workers!
Close, they are saying the response wasn’t proportional, there new favorite response since October 7th. It's like someone bought the left a word a day calendar but they keep forgetting to change the day.
Even Chicago police officers have the right to defend themselves.
Let's not get crazy here.
"UN climate chief presses for faster action, says humans have 2 years left 'to save the world'"
[...]
"OXFORD, England -- Humanity has only two years left “to save the world” by making dramatic changes in the way it spews heat-trapping emissions and it has even less time to act to get the finances behind such a massive shift, the head of the United Nations climate agency said..."
https://abcnews.go.com/Business/wireStory/climate-chief-presses-faster-action-humans-2-years-109082284
Just guessing but it's likely the 'finances' part of the comment are of prime importance.
Oh, and this is the 2024 version of the claim, not the 1990 one or the 1995 one or the 2001 one or the...
That thing also want all white people to die
It’s all about the Benjamins.
Two years huh? Might be a good time to sell that life insurance policy.
Thank God! In two years, they'll finally shut up and switch to something more existential, like hangnails.
Nah, this is like the jelly of the month club, where the same crap keeps showing up in your mailbox even after you trashed the previous 10 deliveries.
Jelly of the Month Club: "It's the gift that keeps on giving, Clark."
I'm curious how many times the world has to end before we can reasonably expect to get on with the rest of our lives.
In other words, Trump’s tariff would disrupt huge amounts of trade, make many products more expensive, and wouldn’t even help reduce the budget deficit. That’s a serious lose-lose-lose.
I’m going to need someone to clarify for me, the libertarian precept behind the idea that our government making less money off of private trade with a communist dictatorship is a lose-lose-lose situation.
Because it doesn’t make any sense unless, of course, you consider those fees owed to the government and are, yourself, conflating “managed trade” or “command trade” with actual people freely trading among themselves.
I guess maybe I must just be one of those anti-progressive, anti-globalist cranks and not some actual libertarian.
According to sarc, we should be taking full advantage of stolen IP and slave labor by buying cheap shit from China.
To be fair. He thinks free market is unilateral disadvantaged trade. A one sided trade agreement.
sarcasmic 1 week ago
Flag Comment
Mute User
He knows that the “free” in free trade means the freedom to trade with people in other political jurisdictions without interference from yours. Even he isn’t that stupid. Which means he’s arguing in bad faith by trying to slip in false premises, like always.
If Trump passed a 60% tax on Chinese Communist protection rackets, Boehm would write an article about the lose-lose-lose of businesses losing Chinese protection, Communists losing income, and the US Government losing revenue on the transaction.
I can't figure out why Boehm and the other leftists masking themselves as libertarian, has such a laser like focus on this one topic while ignoring the US regulatory costs. The latter dwarfs tariff costs. But rarely a whimper. The entire reason China is cheaper is through theft and regulatory advantage. They have no novel technology. They do have slave labor. They steal and resell items from what they stole. Even this theft costs and domestic security costs dwarf the costs of tariffs.
But there is this weird fucking belief that we should just accept these costs domestically and ignore it. Despite it being an acceptance of the violation of the NAP on consumers and domestic business. It is very much like the arguments for illegal immigration. Ignore all costs.
It is dishonest economic analysis.
Chicago cops fired 96 shots in 41 seconds and killed Dexter Reed, a black man, after pulling him over for failing to wear a seatbelt.
Fuck you Boehm. Fuck you for failing to note that the dead man fired shots before the police did. Fuck you for linking to a paywalled article. Fuck you for linking to that fucking lefty rag WaPo. If I think of anything else, I will get back to you on it.
Keep it up and Boehm will put another BLM sticker on his Prius.
Speaker Johnson flipped his position after viewing secret evidence and now supports section 702. Amazing what a photo of him with a dead hooker can do.
Plausible.
pics whether it happened or not!
Could be. Or it could be just “your wife is about to have a car accident”.
""Speaker Johnson flipped his position after viewing secret evidence ""
The secret evidence is a visit from someone who quickly explains who killed JFK and their willingness to do it again.
Who are you to decide what is enough?
Oh, that's right, you're the "libertarian" who reluctantly and strategically voted for the least libertarian and most authoritarian candidate with the longest record of malfeasance.
We have always been at war with Eastasia and Eurasia.
OJ dead, Peanuts.
I’m sorry to hear that the OJ you had went bad. Might want to put it in the refrigerator next time.
turd, the ass-clown of the commentariat, lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is an asshole and a lying pile of lefty shit.
How about you next?
OJ just died.
https://www.newsweek.com/oj-simpson-dead-family-reacts-1889411
He will find the real killers in Hell.
When my uncle retired, somebody asked him what he was going to do. "I dunno, help OJ find the real killers."
Shit, all he had to do was look in the mirror.
"Well, it's official--murder is finally legal in the state of California."
He'll be able to compare notes with Robert Blake.
Won’t be missed.
So Nordberg took one too many falls at the hands of Lieutenant Frank Drebin.
They should have encouraged him to end it himself during the Bronco chase.
"Mr. Simpson. We know you killed your wife and Mr. Goldman. Please do us all a favor and end it now."
Instead they talked him down. Cops just love to get all that publicity of a big bust.
I know I'm probably going to get my ass kicked for this, but I'm one of the few people who still thinks he was probably innocent. And yes, I have looked at available evidence.
My money was always on the oldest son.
They actually talked about this on my local sports talk radio show today.
Moment Donald Trump treats entire Chick-fil-A restaurant to milkshakes and chicken during surprise Atlanta visit
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13296585/Donald-Trump-ChickfilA-restaurant-Atlanta-campaign-trail.html
Good PR.
PR is the only thing he does well.
Still one more thing than you do well.
He fiddles with kids pretty darn well, and no Klansman's cape is whiter.
turd lies. That's not a surprise to anyone who reads his constant stream of bullshit.
But it's becoming obvious that as Misek is too stupid to understand the concepts of "evidence" or "relevance", the concept of "honesty" is simply beyond the asshole's ken.
That chubby old man sure loves his fast food.
At least Bill Clinton would jog to the McDonalds.
Yes he did…..
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eYt0khR_ej0
FBI campaign: Entrapping autistic teenagers:
https://headlineusa.com/teenager-ensnared-in-fbi-terror-sting/
Entrapping Autistic Teens
Mercurio’s arrest marked at least the fifth teenager arrested by the FBI over the last year in highly dubious terrorism stings.
Last July, then-18-year-old Davin Meyer was arrested as he was about to board an international flight—also out of Denver—allegedly to travel to the Middle East and fight for ISIS. Meyer’s mother, who originally approached law enforcement out of concern for her son, said that the FBI entrapped the boy.
Before Meyer was arrested in July, the FBI announced in June that it arrested 18-year-old Mateo Ventura for intending to support ISIS. However, Ventura’s father, has also accused the FBI of entrapping his son.
Along with Meyer and Ventura, the FBI arrested a 17-year-old boy last August for supposedly plotting to carry out an ISIS-inspired terrorist attack on American soil.
Most recently, the FBI arrested arrested a teenager in December who was supposedly on his way from Denver to fight for ISIS in the Middle East. But like the others, the details of that case show that the teenager, 18-year-old Humzah Mashkoor, was targeted online since he was 16 by at least four undercover FBI agents. And moreover, Mashkoor suffers from mental illness and has high-functioning autism, according to his family.
Needs more descriptions of the “trap”.
ip address for autisticterrorists.com tracks to Flowers By Irene.
I'm beginning to think "Autism" is a bit of a euphemism for deplorables, wrongthinkers, and people averse to The Narrative.
Autism advocacy group's ad on the radio: It's time to look past the label of Autism and see the person.
Me: Someone named their kid Autism?
I consider myself lucky to have grown up where and when I did, because we absolutely improvised some things and blew some things up when nobody was around entirely without FBI encouragement (AFAIK).
when tennis balls still came in steel cans we made little butane cannons from them. flaming tennis balls shot at each other on our NJ streets lol
Those were good times. Almost got killed.
buddy had a 30-pump Daisy & mine was my uncle's top-load Daisy from like 1962 the bb gun wars were fun even if I was less-armed
Yeah, we definitely used more than dry ice to make things go boom.
Dry ice was one of my favorites because, occasionally, if you didn’t get the air/water/CO2 mix right it would freeze a water shell around the dry ice it and it could take 20-30 min. or more before it would detonate.
Is it teetering on the edge of exploding, waiting for you to get near it and poke it to see if it’s about to go off? Or waiting for someone to forget that it’s there and then explode? Nefariously underdosed such that it’s waiting for you to unscrew the cap a little bit like a champagne bottle from Hell?
Safest way to find out is to clear everyone away from it and shoot it!
love it.
Why is there a need for the
GestapoFBI? Couldn't the states do most of their job with the rest being taken up by the United States Marshals Service?would accept necessity of x-files.
When the FBI was founded, it _only_ did investigation. They were not issued guns and did not have authority to arrest anyone or initiate violence. Once they figured out who to arrest, they had to go to the state and local cops, or the US Marshals - who originally seem to have been an arm of the courts rather than the executive branch.
FBI entrapping people for terrorism has been going on for decades.
OJ dying is confusing because he killed 2 people but for 20 years of my life before that he was a giant
I'm going to lose sleep trying to figure out if I can sleep knowing Nicole's killers will never be caught.
Hertz Rental never recovered either.
Don’t worry, Lt Frank Drebin is on the case now that Nordberg is out of the picture.
61 rushing TDs. 62 fumbles. He was a fumbler.
the '78 topps card confused me because he was a 49er & I didn't yet know players changed teams
'Terrible tariff: Trump's proposal to slap a 60 percent tariff on all imports from China would be a massive tax hike on Americans but could actually be a net negative for federal revenue too.'
OK, libertarians, if (when?) we get in a shooting war with China, what is the proper trade policy?
Massive uranium deficit depleted or other. Uranium dispenser go ‘brrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr’.
We won't need a trade policy ever again if we get into a shooting war with China. All we will need to do is to stand well off the coast of China and drop bombs on their military facilities all day long for a few weeks. Then we can suspend the bombing and see whether anyone shoots back. Repeat as necessary. The point is not about what kind of trade policy the U.S. should have - it's about why the hell our officials cannot resist the temptation to even HAVE a trade policy in the first place. Like Heinlein, I too wish the government would wander off somewhere and get lost.
Just for the record, we ain't got that many bombs left.
Also for the record, if we kill 80% of them, they can still fight back.
(remember a place called Viet Nam? A campaign called Linebacker?)
My point was that we should not care whether they can fight back or not. They're not going to leave China to do it. And, for the record, we WOULD have enough bombs to keep them on the mainland indefinitely if we weren't subsidizing Ukraine and every other tinpot dictator in the world against "terrists" for the last two decades and probably the next decade as well. Vietnam is a perfect example of what the U.S. should never EVER do. And I am not advocating war with China now or ever. I was talking about it having nothing whatever to do with trade policy, just the hypothetical if China started a war with us. But if you will recall, Japan launched the surprise attack against our sitting ducks in Pearl Harbor because of FDR's "trade policy" of denying Japan access to oil supplies to fuel their war to conquer China. As long as we're "remembering" past American stupid mistakes.
China's navy is now larger than ours.
Unrestricted trade with our enemies so Sarc can get an extra 3% off of some cheap crap.
I don’t know how China might have become YOUR enemy, but China is not MY enemy. Go sell it to someone more xenophobic and ignorant like yourself.
Ok commie.
Meet our new United States Trade Representative, Milo Minderbinder.
>>The 19 Republicans who voted to sink the preliminary vote
momentary heroes. the moment has passed.
'The widespread use of eminent domain against private landowners is a little-known, dark chapter in the history of many of America's national parks.'
Even worse were actions to "relocate" those unsightly indigenous people from some western parks, in order to create a more idealized "unspoiled" landscape for the elites to enjoy.
>>in 2018—and Trump signed the bill
different congress.
DOJ: Fani isn't prosecuting enough white people.
https://twitter.com/ultradane/status/1777872609742627001
She's doing her best, Merrick. There's only so many white people there. At 42% black and another 20% other, you really have to hunt for them.
Plus you have her busy attacking the political oppo.
>>Former President Donald Trump's latest attempt at postponing his Manhattan trial has failed.
are you crowing or is that link about the injustice?
You know the answer.
it's a little painful this place is this place now.
"are you crowing or is that link about the injustice?"
It's the guy that told us that a vote for Biden was 'strategic'.
lol see below.
>>Americans are still not worried enough about the threat of global war.
the strategic ironing is delicious.
>>Iran draws a red line:
votes have consequences.
>>Eminent domain was used to evict over 2,000 people who refused to leave voluntarily.
geez were they even Mattaponi?
Unless they slaughtered and took some 2,000 other Virginians hostage and people sat in traffic while chanting "From the River to the Sea" I can't be bothered to care.
>>A government-enabled monopoly is responsible for the loss of 17,000 kidney transplants in the U.S. every year.
monopolies don't lose kidneys. people lose kidneys.
Search warrants are not necessary in communist and fascist states. The problem for me is the US becoming a fascist or a communist state?
Yes, every single day. Climate fascism
https://time.com/6958606/climate-change-transition-capitalism/
"is the US becoming a fascist or a communist state?"
It's the twenty-first century, transphobe. They can be both.
Fascism is simply mild communism. The government doesn’t shoot businessmen and confiscate their business, but it regulates so heavily that it’s making more business decisions than the owners – and if the executive branch wants something that Congress or the courts will balk at requiring, it gets the businessmen to cooperate with vague threats. “That’s a nice social media company you’ve got there, so cancel this disinformation* or else.”
*Disinformation = probably true posts that the government does not want revealed. If they can prove something is false, they don’t bother censoring it.
We’ve been a fascist state going on 100 years now.
"Americans are still not worried enough about the threat of global war."
Nope, you're a Cassandra AND a fool. There is nothing whatever that any of us can do to "mitigate" a large-scale war with China. We are already deep into the middle of the Global War on Everything with no end in sight. Our "leaders" instead of holding their fire and keeping our powder dry have been squandering our ammunition and skimping on necessary maintenance and replacement of our aging military technology so that we would be at reduced capacity in the case of a not unexpected emergency. The article linked above is just silly - tantamount to "be afraid ... be VERY afraid!"
Did you intentionally omit the fact that the driver in Chicago failed to follow police instructions and actually fired the first shots at the officers?
Do you really want a repeat of the Summer of 2020 based on a fallacy perpetuated by poor reporting?
Yes, they probably do want that.
Arte these the same people who claimed that the riot in the Capitol was caused by Trump promoting Badthink®™>
>Chicago cops fired 96 shots in 41 seconds and killed Dexter Reed, a black man, after pulling him over for failing to wear a seatbelt.
No, asshole - they shot him because he shot at them first. Shot at them a lot first. *Then* they returned fire.
Wasn't the crux of this whether they stopped him for and was it legit, proper stop? Something about the claim that 5 tactical officers (whatever that means) surrounded his car for not wearing a seatbelt, but also then claimed he had heavy tinted windows that he refused to roll down. Which lead to the question of how could you see if he was wearing a seatbelt with heavy tinted rolled up windows or something. Then the lead started flying with him shooting 11 times and the cops shooting 100 times with one officer alone firing 50 rounds, including 3 rounds at the motionless body on the ground.
The ACLU previously sued over the department’s so-called stop-and-frisk practices, leading to a settlement that contributed to a significant drop-off in the number of street stops in recent years.
There were, however, unintended consequences. “What the CPD did was shift from pedestrian stops to mass traffic stops to basically get around both the stop-and-frisk settlement and the consent decree,” Block said.