Pennsylvania Lawmakers Aim To Grant Amnesty To Bars That Violated COVID Lockdown Orders
The move comes in response to Reason's reporting about the Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board's push to crack down on licensees for minor violations racked up during the pandemic.

Some bars and restaurants that got in trouble for breaking the state government's COVID-19 closure orders are still being hounded by the Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board (PLCB).
Now, some state lawmakers have a message for the liquor regulators: "Back off!"
Bills introduced recently in the state House and state Senate would extend amnesty to bars, restaurants, and other venues with liquor licenses that may have racked up COVID-era violations. Specifically, the bills would prohibit the PLCB from revoking or suspending any liquor license due to a failure to comply with COVID-19 orders from the state's governor and Department of Health, and they would force the PLCB to remove any disciplinary actions already taken against licensees.
The collection of bills is a response to the PLCB's practice of imposing "conditional licensing agreements" on establishments that ran afoul of Pennsylvania's strict lockdown rules during the pandemic.
As Reason has previously reported, some of those violations were for ticky-tack offenses. One York County tavern was written up multiple times by PLCB agents for things as innocuous as allowing a band to use the bar's power supply for an outdoor concert, and for a private indoor gathering at a time when bars were required to be closed to the public. When that tavern's owners tried to renew their license with the PLCB last year, they were forced to sign a conditional licensing agreement that has resulted in higher insurance premiums and that comes with the risk of losing their license if another violation occurs.
"The Liquor Control Board has the opportunity to move on from the unilateral and subjective rules in place during the pandemic that destroyed lives and livelihoods, especially our locally owned businesses, but they appear fixated on relitigating the past which will continue to make these small businesses suffer even more," state Sen. Kristin Phillips-Hill (R–York), a co-sponsor of one of the bills, told Reason. Senate President Kim Ward (R–Westmoreland) has signed on to support Phillips-Hill's proposal, a signal that it could move quickly through the Republican-controlled chamber.
Prior to the pandemic, the PLCB used conditional licensing agreements to crack down on nuisance bars or establishments with a track record of selling to underage customers. Since January 2022, however, the board has approved dozens of conditional licensing agreements based on COVID-era violations alone. "The people who violated the governor's mandates and orders should face some consequences," argued Mary Isenhour, one of the PLCB's three board members, at a January 2022 meeting where the first of those agreements was approved.
At a hearing last month, Phillips-Hill blasted the PLCB's top brass for the board's handling of the COVID-era violations.
"The dilemma that we faced is that most licensees in the commonwealth adhered to the rules and sacrificed their income, sacrificed their businesses in some cases," said PLCB Chairman Tim Holden in response. "How is it fair to the establishments that played by the rules…compared to the establishment that ignored everything and kept operating?"
That is, in fairness, a somewhat difficult question. But it ignores some important facts, like the minor violations that landed some bars in hot water with the PLCB, and the reality of Pennsylvania's COVID-19 lockdowns, which were some of the strictest in the country and prompted the passage of a state constitutional amendment stripping some emergency powers from the executive branch.
State Rep. Russ Diamond (R–Lebanon) says the amnesty effort is necessary so the state and its residents can move on from a dark period. In addition to granting amnesty to bars and other establishments with liquor licenses, he's introduced a similar bill granting amnesty to all professions governed by state licensing boards.
"Society has been suffering from a collective form of PTSD as a result of the heavy-handed Covid mitigation efforts imposed by the government," Diamond told Reason. The amnesty bills, he says, are "the least we can do to help to heal those lingering wounds and move forward as a healthy society."
Four years after the pandemic began, public officials have the benefit of hindsight and lots of information that may have been lacking during the chaotic days in March 2020. Ordering businesses to close never made much sense, but continuing to punish businesses that managed to survive the pandemic (and the government's response to it) isn't helping anyone.
Even Gov. Josh Shapiro, a Democrat who was elected to that office in 2022 after defending Pennsylvania's COVID lockdown orders in court when he was the state's attorney general, has admitted that officials "got it wrong" in the early days of the pandemic. For everyone's sake, it seems best to acknowledge that mistakes were made—not to continue enforcing misguided rules.
"I firmly believe we need to move on from enforcing unilateral shutdowns," says Phillips-Hill, "just like the voters decided to do when they amended their state constitution nearly three years ago."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
"Pennsylvania Lawmakers Aim To Grant Amnesty To Bars That Violated COVID Lockdown Orders."
Gee, it must be an election year if the fascists in power are offering amnesty to the sane.
Rather than granting amnesty, they should dissolve the board and leave the bar owners alone.
Oh, wait; Pennsylvania. Never mind.
Washington State isn’t any better.
You’re free to leave
Yeah, he shouldn’t live in a slave state.
Stupid f'ing response. "you're free to leave" is so simplistic and ignores the realities attendant with that decision. Better to change the stupid laws.
Leaving has been a relatively popular choice in California over the last 30 years, and increasingly so since 2020. In terms of net migration, the number of people fleeing the results of unhindered Progressive Governance under the Newsom Regime is equivalent to at least two full Congressional Districts, although that change won't be reflected in DC for another 8 or 9 years since it's happened so rapidly after the Census.
What about all the dead grandmas?
Well, they no longer buy booze, do they? So who cares?
It's not like that will stop them from voting for democrats or anything.
Their votes are already committed so no need to pander to them.
They will just find another way to get them. The Club that I'm on the Board of Officers for was cited by LCB. Our crime was making meals for some of our elderly members. We stored the ingredients in the same walk in cooler that we keep beer and other things in. It didn't matter that at the time there was no alcohol on the premises. We were told that we should let the State Government's Agency on Aging take care of them. Yeah right. Meals on Wheels had shut down almost a month before. If LCB wants you, they will find a way.
"How is it fair to the establishments that played by the rules…compared to the establishment that ignored everything and kept operating?"
Suddenly "fair" enters the picture.
"The dilemma that we faced is that most licensees in the commonwealth adhered to the rules and sacrificed their income, sacrificed their businesses in some cases," said PLCB Chairman Tim Holden in response. "How is it fair to the establishments that played by the rules…compared to the establishment that ignored everything and kept operating?"
It seems a shame to abbreviate that quote. The first 2 lines are so sinister that it makes the rest seem reasonable.
"These are the little bitches that refused to jump into the volcano to end our collective punishment by the Gods of Public Health."
Places in PA which only face fines are relatively lucky.
The city of Glendale in CA more or less declared war on a restaurant which continued to allow people to eat their carry-out orders in the "outdoor dining" area on their property after the city and county had re-instituted a closure order for outdoor dining long after the actual science was clear that the spread of Covid-19 in outdoor environments was nearly impossible (some might argue that this should have been considered to be known in Fall of 2019, but L.A. County maintained many unnecessary closures through nearly all of 2020 and well into 2021 when it was undeniable).
Probably the best way to save the USA from a Nazi-Empire.
The State's need to counter UN-Constitutional [Na]tional So[zi]alist policy in D.C. Supremacy doesn't exist for a Nazi-Empire.
A small step in the right direction. A much better step would be to disband the PLCB.
Like that's ever going to happen.
TBF, there have been a few (few ) positive changes over the last few years including more supermarkets and convenience stores able to sell beer and wine (and not being forced to buy a case of beer at a beer distributor when you only want a 6 pack) but the unions have tremendous power in PA so unlikely we will get rid of the LCB
The State Employees Union is the problem. It is a double edge sword. It prevents the State from getting out of the liquor business and it protects the LCB employees who abuse their power. I've had an LCB agent tell me that he didn't care what the law said, it was what he said that counted, right before he cited us for a $500 fine. We supposedly didn't have our Bank Account structured correctly. When we appeared in front of the Arbitrator, I showed him that we were setup correctly that the new system didn't go into effect until the following month.
"Four years after the pandemic began, public officials have the benefit of hindsight and lots of information that may have been lacking during the chaotic days in March 2020."
It is not that the information was "lacking". The information was there but many state and local governments ignored and worked with social media to suppress that information. Physicians who did not promote the government narrative lost their jobs and some their medical license. The states that let freedom be a guide rather than clueless public health officials suffered no more deaths than dictator states. Also, the states that returned to "normal" after only a few weeks suffered less economic losses.
My county had schools open as normal in the fall of 2020. There was no mask mandates anywhere. We had no Covid deaths of anyone under the age of 50. The large majority of the deaths were in the three nursing home facilities and were of people whose health was already seriously compromised.
Fuck you, bitch.
Amnesty implies they did something wrong, when it was the board that was wrong.