Most Americans Aren't Buying Biden's Misleading Narrative That the Economy Is Getting Better
The question of how best to measure inflation has no single and straightforward answer, but most people know that the president's economic claims aren't true.

The economy is growing, unemployment is low, wages are up, and inflation is down. However, the American people remain grumpy about the state of the economy. This puzzle was just investigated by four economists. They found that people often know that something is wrong even if statistics don't reflect the problem. In this case, people are perceiving that inflation is still, in fact, high.
For months now, Americans have been told that inflation's downward trend, from almost 9 percent annually to around 3 percent, should make them feel good about the economy. But it isn't working. A recent Gallup poll found that 63 percent say the state of the economy is getting worse and 45 percent think it's already "poor." One reason, many have speculated, is that while the rate at which prices are rising might have slowed considerably, prices remain very high. Food and rent in particular are still expensive. These prices are felt everyday by Americans when they pay for their housing and go to the supermarket.
But that's not all. A new study from the National Bureau of Economic Research by economists Marijn Bolhuis, Judd Cramer, Karl Schulz, and Larry Summers finds that a change in the method used to estimate inflation today, compared to the method used in the 1980s, might well cause an underestimation of the true level of inflation.
The paper—"The Cost of Money Is Part of the Cost of Living"—highlights the overlooked impact of the highest borrowing costs consumers have faced in decades. From mortgages to car loans to credit card debt, those costs are up.
As the authors explain, the pre-1983 measure of inflation (the Consumer Price Index) counted the price and interest rate Americans paid to buy housing. The newer measure is based on what it costs to rent housing. Another way to think about it is if you buy a house this month, the monthly payments will be much higher than if you bought one three years ago. The same is true of a car or other purchase. But measuring inflation based on rental costs—which may not incorporate the sky-high interest rates of a new purchase—doesn't reflect that difference.
As Summers, the Treasury Secretary under President Bill Clinton, noted on X, formerly Twitter, "Pre-1983, mortgage costs were in the CPI as were car payments pre-1998. Now, price indexes do not include borrowing costs. Thus, when interest rates jumped last year, official inflation did not fully capture the effects it would have on consumer well-being."
Indeed, if we measured inflation as we did in the 1970s, the inflation that started in 2021 would have peaked at 18 percent—double its reported peak. That's higher than the worst of the 1970 and '80s. Inflation's current annual rate would be about 8 percent.
As Summers notes, measuring inflation the pre-1983 way helps explain "70% of the gap in consumer sentiment we saw last year." Not surprisingly, Americans have a better sense of the state of the economy and their daily lives than the economists who focus mostly on data, models, and indexes for information about the world.
I assume this paper by Summers and co-authors will revive the debate about how we should measure inflation. John Cochrane, over at the Grumpy Economist Substack, observes that to answer this question properly, you have to ask first what you're trying to measure:
The new way is closer to right, if the question is to measure changes in the cost of living right now for the average person.…Most people live in older houses with fixed mortgages, so higher prices and mortgage rates for new houses don't affect them. People who rent don't care. While higher interest rates are a cost to borrowers, and higher house prices a cost to buyers, higher interest rates are higher income to savers and higher house prices a boon to downsizers. Those wash on average.
But if the question instead is whether Americans feel that their lives are improving from a few years ago based on the idea that inflation is allegedly falling and they can rent a house just like theirs for less money, then the answer is different.
The bottom line is that, while the question of how best to measure inflation has no single and straightforward answer, one mystery has been clearly solved by Summers and his co-authors. People aren't crazy. Even if every media outlet and the president continue to insist that ordinary Americans' lives are getting better because of falling inflation, we know that's not right.
COPYRIGHT 2024 CREATORS.COM.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
The Reason comment’s premier economist, Hillary Clinton’s Buttplug, hardest hit.
Tomorrow he’ll contradict this by informing us that:
– Canceling pipelines and forcing all oil transportation onto rail doesn’t affect prices. Banning drilling from all public lands doesn’t either, and by the way, high oil prices are a good thing.
– Inflation isn’t happening because the price of precious metals declined in trading one week.
-The US doesn’t export its inflation to its trading partners. This is a conspiracy theory or something. Brietbart, blap!
"A new study from the National Bureau of Economic Research by economists Marijn Bolhuis, Judd Cramer, Karl Schulz, and Larry Summers finds that a change in the method used to estimate inflation today, compared to the method used in the 1980s, might well cause an underestimation of the true level of inflation."
Impossible, next they'll tell us the government has been rounding down the job figures for every single month by as much as half, and long after initial release, for several years now.
So, I live in a petroleum extraction area. Thus, industries tied to oil extraction and the service industry in the area are celebrating prices above $80, however, the long term residents, tied to traditional agriculture and agricultural support are getting hammered as fuel prices and chemical costs have increased because of higher petroleum prices. In the past two weeks, gas prices have gone up $0.40 a gallon and diesel higher, just before planting and calving. This is a real hit to the majority of people in the area but for the oil field workers (a lot of whom are transients who come into the area for a short period and then leave) it's a boon. It's also a boon for the handful of land owners with mineral rights and recoverable oil deposits. Everyone else pays though. If we look at the gross economy, it looks good on paper but for every day living and especially for long term inhabitants, it's a real challenge.
The best way would be food prices.
Rent vs buy. Who can afford to buy? But everyone has to buy food and it's gone way, way up. Even water has gone up at the store from where I work from 96 cents a gallon to 1.34 in the last few years.
That's just water. Food is much, much worse. Yet people's pay have not risen nearly as much.
I have not seen one (please find one ) economist who doesn't say that Biden's ( a $10,000 tax credit for first-time homebuyers ) will DRIVE UP HOME PRICES !!!! UP !!!!
A friend of mine who works in a hospital pharmacy just bought a home. Her apartment complex was going to raise rent by some obscene amount so she decided it was time to buy. She had savings and a good relationship with her parents so she managed a good sized down payment, got a good rate and very soon will share the house with the bank. Her monthly payments will be lower than the rent she would have to pay if she stayed in the apartment.
Rising rents make home ownership seem more affordable to her.
Same happened to us a few years back. Either a 200 dollar a month increase in rent for our tiny apartment or get off our butts and join the property owner side. So we got motivated and found a nice house. Well, nice for us.
soon she will learn that all the things that raise rents, also raise the cost of home ownership.
taxes, repairs, lawn care, etc
That's where being friends with me pays off. I spent over 30 years doing everything needed for home maintenance and repair. I just don't do anything on ladders and I don't paint things. But I've got my son's friends who are so starved for adult male attention I can get them to go up on ladders and paint. Saves a lot when you don't have to pay for anything but materials and pizza.
Until rocketing interest rates affect her payment by about as much like they are here in Canada.
Most US mortgages are fixed rate.
I didn’t think that this sounded true, but a quick Google-ing comes up with around 90% of mortgages (in the US) are fixed rate (BankRate.com). Neat.
I originated residential mortgage loans for many years. Borrowers almost always take the fixed rate. Even when it didn’t really make sense for them. People’s are conditioned to think variable rate loans = bad.
Really? When the housing bubble was bursting in the 00s in Colorado. I was foreclosing on the houses that you guys were financing. My wife was cold calling life insurance sales to old people. We knew we were going to Hell.
You probably own a lovely little cottage in Hell across the street from us and down the street from the Hitlers!
I don't know why anyone who understands economics would want a variable rate in this Mr Toads Wild Ride of an economy.
I have an advanced degree in finance, and *I* find it confounding that most anyone would want a variable rate at all -- unless it has a cap/floor and/or can easily and cheaply be refinanced to fixed-rate if rates plummet.
Teaser ARMs were a big part of the subprime mortgage black hole that caused the 2008 collapse. To this day, I remember the radio advertisements for "jumbo mortgages of $600k+ with payments of $700/month" and I immediately knew that was utterly insane and nonsensical, because I'd seen amortization tables (and knew roughly what payments *should* be when I was first looking for a home, which was that even a $150K loan for a condo at 5% over 30 years was ~$800/month, and that wasn't even counting the HOA fees!).
Canada is never a good example to use.
The Dollar Store is now the 'dollar and a quarter store.'
I always laugh when people get panicky about inflation. When I was young gasoline cost less than a dollar a gallon. I recall seeing the gas stations painting a "1" on their signs in front of the changeable cents. Everyone cried that the end was near then. It didn't happen.
Yeah, it sucks. Deal with it because it ain't going to change. This shit will be happening 100 years from now. It's a function of government.
Coming soon, they're the $7 store, because even the middle class has started shopping there to avoid all the Xidentrumpflation.
Consider the fakeo uninformed Climate and Pollution speeches of Biden
He is exacerbating BOTH problems
Consider 2 facts here both from recent weeks
1) Solar farm the size of 2,500 football fields destroyed in Texas amid growing solar e-waste problem
By Kevin Killough
2) JAN 2024
BLM proposes to open 22 million acres in Western states to solar development
Oh, those silly goddam environmentalists supporting the greatest land destroyer of our generation
It is a bit ironic that the things meant to stop rising temperatures were destroyed by ice and now leak chemicals into the environment.
It's not irony. It's fucking puppet show justice.
So much of this article is /facepalm worthy.
Are we really taking it seriously that lower inflation (after years of high inflation) should make us more comfortable? Definition check - what is inflation? Rising cost due to A, B, and C. It doesn’t matter if it’s going up slow or fast. If people can’t afford it, they’ll continue to not be able to afford it until wages catch up.
But salaries won’t ever catch up.
What is needed is something that leads to deflation - like increased production. But we are so leveraged to the hilt in higher education in stupidity that there is no competent labor to hire and regulations are so far and beyond reasonable, it stifles. And for some reason, all our farmable land is majority owned by China and Bill Gates. Deflation ain’t happening.
And no one is chomping at the bit to increase salary. They’d rather fire everyone, putting them in minimum wage jobs (which further increases cost of living where those wages are increasing by force of law) or put on welfare which increases government printing presses.
We are so screwed. And it’s not just government at fault. It’s journalists that are absolute idiots that write crap like “we should be happy inflation is down.” It’s old “intelligent” people who refuse to allow their housing prices to deflate. It’s bleeding hearts that can’t thread the needle between cost of living and minimum wage relationship. It’s consumers that are totally clueless about regulatory burden. It’s an upper class totally divested from American education excepting in how much money they can scam from the population and the government.
Get back to me when we cross the untouchable barrier into deflation.
Inflation got you down? Just change the calculation for inflation calculations.
https://www.fedsmith.com/2023/04/19/inflation-severity-depends-how-its-measured/
Its the democratic way.
Inflation is good for borrowers because the money they use to pay back the loan is worth less than the money they borrowed.
The federal government is the biggest borrower in the history of history, and it controls the money supply (inflation/deflation).
So we’re not going to get deflation. Just varying rates of inflation.
Spoken like a bumper sticker economist. True if you have excess assets and not living paycheck to paycheck. Where a lot of borrowers are. Because they pay more in interest and they have lower real wages. Debt to income ratio increases like the national debt.
Your argument is essentially what the Peronistas argued in Argentina. Increase inflation to make debts less. Go with that.
I actually think sarcasmic is fair here. You are right that inflation is generally not good for people, even borrowers- but since the U.S. government isn't really concerned with long-term good ideas, just reelection, they like inflation because it gives them an out.
Inflation is bad, deflation is worse.
Milk carton slogans are useless.
There is a tolerance range for both. What there is not a tolerance for is exclusively one and never the other or excessively high for either.
re: "deflation is worse"
Prove it. Slow deflation was the norm for the first couple thousand years since we invented currency. Nothing especially bad happened as a result. Inflation is, historically, a very recent phenomenon.
Pretty much a post WW I effect. Some weird examples before that, Spanish gold from their new world conquests actually causing a specie based economy to suffer inflation, but yeah, 20th century invention.
Except, unless $20 Happy Meals are something to look forward to, we need to deflate at some time. Better gradual deflation than explosive deflation.
FDR Great Depression
Obama Great Recession
Biden's Great Inflation
All outcomes of a Democratic Socialist Trifecta.
Why you gotta do Carter's stagflation so dirty?
lol. What fucking horseshit.
"Indeed, if we measured inflation as we did in the 1970s, the inflation that started in 2021 would have peaked at 18 percent—double its reported peak. That's higher than the worst of the 1970 and '80s. Inflation's current annual rate would be about 8 percent."
Why in the world are they surprised no one believes their faked numbers? Either they think we're stupid, or they're too stupid to realize we're not stupid enough to be fooled. Take your pick.
Or they are powerful enough to not give a shit what we think...
Subsidized grocery stores and streaming services put bread and circuses to shame.
That is not the way business economists think of things, or CMA's
EG
Nov 2, 2021 — College costs have increased by 169% since 1980—but pay for young workers is up by just 19%,
AND
Aug 13, 2023 — College tuition inflation averaged 12% annually from 2010 to 2022
And what did that tuition increase buy? An immense compliance bureaucracy.
The economy is growing, unemployment is low, wages are up, and inflation is down. However, the American people remain grumpy about the state of the economy.
LOL. Ya’ll should stick to emptytheprisons and shitty movie reviews.
They found that people often know that something is wrong even if statistics don't reflect the problem.
I certainly hope so
https://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0393310728/reasonmagazinea-20/
"The question of how best to measure inflation has no single and straightforward answer . . . "
But we all know (politicians aside) that taking out considering food and energy, the two things everyone HAS to buy, is NOT the correct answer.
Why not just take out everything and have a rate of zero?
Common sense says what most people have to pay for most things that most people use, is the definition of inflation and that is why the acrimony over Paul Krugman
Nobel economist Paul Krugman gets trolled for saying inflation is over if you just exclude most of what people buy
C'mon, you sound like a wealthy politician pretending to be one of the guys by eating an ice cream cone. 🙂
Steven Pinker started this nonsense. Things look and feel and act like sht but,hey , we are doing great.
Paul Krugman too,another fake mind
NY Times’ Paul Krugman says ‘inflation is over’ — if you exclude food, gas and rent
I say, Honey is it raining? and Honey says let me look on the Internet. Internet says 'NO' and I go out and it is a downpour.
I don't think this has much to do with the things Pinker has claimed. Things may be going in bad directions now, but it's still true (for now) that compared to most of human history, an awful lot of people live remarkably safe and comfortable lives. Even when the economy sucks.
Yes, but that argument is against you.
IF I have a technizque that will produce 5X more food, eg, and you misuse it to produce 2X ---and then boast, you are crowing about the many people who could have been helped but your misuse has hurt.
Why compare as if the impovement in the safe and comfortable lives wasn't largely at the expense of those suffering. That is Utilitraianism
So in order to get his useless failing climate agreement with China Biden went along with organ harvesting,Uyghur persecution and attacks on the Falun Gong
Enjoy your nice life but it is being bought with other's lives
Against me how? Things are materially, objectively better in terms of material prosperity and standard of living than any time in human history. That doesn't mean things couldn't be better or that we aren't headed for disaster.
Okay, but that treats the big things in life as controlled by some bogey man force. The evil, the bad is the people and acts that are making things go in the wrong direction. If they could do it faster they would.
Biden is doing 3 horrible things.
Bankrupting the future of the country and we can see that clearly now.
He is changing and hiding redefinitions of jobs, recession, crime states,etc
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/policy/economy/226470/bidens-desperate-attempt-to-redefine-recession/
Three, the real crisis the family and the decline in births. !/4 of all males are now growing up with no family. Ask any criminologist, this is the most fertile soil for crime and violence. and as families decline the welfare pyramid collapses. SOMEBODY pays for the people at the top, retired and collecting SS.
Three, the real crisis the family and the decline in births. !/4 of all males are now growing up with no family. Ask any criminologist, this is the most fertile soil for crime and violence. and as families decline the welfare pyramid collapses. SOMEBODY pays for the people at the top, retired and collecting SS.
First world problems.
Not at all. We need people to succeed us in all positions of society.
Even if inflation ended right now, prices would not come down. They'd simply stop increasing. So for anyone hoping prices are going to come back down to pre-inflation levels, you're shit outta luck.
Best we can hope for is that the rate of increase slows, and that our paychecks keep up. But pre-emergency-spending prices are gone forever.
You forget your hashing.
#VoteJoeBiden
"But pre-emergency-spending prices are gone forever."
What was the emergency?
Where have you been? You don't need an emergency to do emergency spending.
Remarks by President Trump at Signing of H.R.748, The CARES Act
Oval Office
4:10 P.M. EDT
THE PRESIDENT: Well, thank you all very much. This is a very important day. I’ll sign the single-biggest economic relief package in American history and, I must say, or any other package, by the way. It’s twice as large as any relief ever signed. It’s $2.2 billion, but it actually goes up to 6.2 — potentially — billion dollars — trillion dollars. So you’re talking about 6.2 trillion-dollar bill. Nothing like that. And this will deliver urgently needed relief to our nation’s families, workers, and businesses. And that’s what this is all about.
And it got a 96 to nothing. And, I don’t know, what was the number in Congress?
PARTICIPANT: A voice vote.
THE PRESIDENT: A voice? It was fantastic.
PARTICIPANT: I think it was just as close.
THE PRESIDENT: That’s pretty amazing. That’s about the same thing. Right, Kevin?
LEADER MCCARTHY: Yes.
THE PRESIDENT: So, that’s fantastic. But I want to thank Republicans and Democrats for coming together, setting aside their differences, and putting America first.
This legislation provides for direct payments to individuals and unprecedented support to small businesses. We’re going to keep our small businesses strong and our big businesses strong. And that’s keeping our country strong and our jobs strong.
This historic bill includes the following:
$300 billion in direct cash payments will be available to every American citizen earning less than $99,000 per year; $3,400 for a typical family of four. So a family of four: $3,400.
And then $350 billion in job retention loans for small businesses, with loan forgiveness available for businesses that continue paying their workers. The workers get paid.
Approximately $250 billion in expanded unemployment benefits. The average worker who has lost his or her job will receive 100 percent of their salary for up to four full months.
So, things like this have never happened in our country.
$500 billion in support for hard-hit industries, with a ban on corporate stock buybacks — we don’t let them buy back the stock; we don’t let that happen — and tough limits on executive compensation.
Over $100 billion to support our heroic doctors, nurses, and hospitals. And you see what’s happening. And I want to thank, while we’re here, also the incredible job that’s done by the Army Corps of Engineers and by FEMA. It’s been incredible. They did four hospitals in two days or three days, in New York. And they’re, like, incredible structures. What a job they’ve been doing. And they’re doing them all over the country.
$45 billion for the Disaster Relief Fund, supporting our state, local, and tribal leaders.
$27 billion for the development of vaccines, therapies, and other public health response efforts, including $16 billion to build up the Strategic National Stockpile with critical stockpiles. And I’m going to — we have tremendous supplies coming into the stockpile, and you’ll be seeing that and hearing about it in a little bit because we’re doing a news conference at 5:30 on what’s happening.
We’ve had tremendous results on the respirators. We’ve had great results on just about everything we’re talking about. Boeing just announced that they’re going to be making the plastic field shields — the actual shields, which are hard to come by, and they’re going to be making them by the thousands a week.
And the ventilators, which is probably the most difficult because it’s like — it’s like building a car — we will be announcing thousands of — are going to be built and we have them under contract and we have fast deliveries. As you know, we delivered thousands to New York. And unfortunately — they were delivered to a warehouse, which was good — unfortunately, they didn’t take them, but now they’re taking them. New York is now taking them and redistributing them around the areas that they need.
So you have also $3.5 billion to states to expand childcare benefits for healthcare workers, first responders, and others on the frontlines of this crisis, and $1 billion for securing supplies under the Defense Protection Act. And, as you know, I’ve enacted the act. We’ve used it three or four times. I pulled it back three times because the companies came through, in the end. They didn’t need the act. It’s been great leverage.
I have instituted it against General Electric. We thought we had a deal for 40,000 ventilators and, all of the sudden, the 40,000 came down to 6,000. And then they talked about a higher price than we were discussing, so I didn’t like it. So we did — we did activate it, with respect to General Motors. And hopefully, maybe we won’t even need the full activation. We’ll find out. But we need the ventilators.
I said hello today — I called him — a wonderful guy, Boris Johnson. As you know, he tested positive. And before he even said hello, he said, “We need ventilators.” I said, “Wow. That’s a big statement.” And hopefully, he’s going to be in good shape.
I just spoke to Angela Merkel, and she’s quarantined also. She is right now, for a period of two weeks, being forced to stay in her house. So this is just an incredible situation.
Last night, I spoke to President Xi. We talked about the experience that they had in China and all of the things that have taken place. And we learned a lot. They’ve had a very tough experience, and they’re doing well and he’s doing well. President Xi is doing very well. But we learned a lot and we have great communication together.
We’re going to be sent great data from China — things that happened that they see that — you know, they’ve had a — they’ve had an early experience, and we’re getting all of that information. Much of it has already been sent. It was sent yesterday and sent to our scientists to study. So we’ll have more on that also. We’ll be discussing that at 5:30.
I just want to thank the people behind me. They’ve been incredible friends. They’ve been warriors. They — there’s nobody tougher or smarter than the people standing alongside of me. And I think I want to start off by asking Mitch and then Kevin to speak, and then we’re going to go through a few of the folks in the room if they’d like to say something.
But, Mitch, I’d like — I’d love to say a few words because you — this man worked 24 hours a day for a long time. This is the result. It’s the biggest ever — ever approved in Congress: 6.2 bill- — $6.2 trillion. So, you know, we used to get used to the billion. It used to be million, then it was billion, now it’s trillion. And it’s going to go a long way. It’s going to make a lot of people very happy.
And there's A LOT MORE where that came from.
https://trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov/briefings-statements/remarks-president-trump-signing-h-r-748-cares-act/
Trump happily signs emergency relief: “Trump is EVIL!”
Biden happily signs every new spending bill with emergency funding levels being the new norm: “But TRUUUUMMMPPPPP!!!”
Thanks Mr BOAF SIDEZ!
His rotgut soaked brain really doesn’t understand the difference. Or much of anything else.
Pour Sarc.
96 votes in the Senate and the president talking it up like that sounds like "both sides" is pretty valid in this case. Biden is even worse, but let's not pretend Trump was on the side of liberty when it came to the pandemic shit.
But the pain people feel is in the distance between pay and prices, inflation notwithstanding. And that is where you are wrong.
Biden is banking a ton of future payments you and your kids will have to pay so that right now you can think things are improving.
Where am I wrong? I think you're arguing against something I didn't say.
IS HE OUT OF HIS MIND !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Biden administration cracks down on so-called junk insurance
American Institute of Economic Research notes:
"how much better those short-term plans often fit the principles of insurance than Obamacare plans."
So we are at the “okay, it’s real but it’s a good thing” stage.
Thank goodness someone did a study!
I see a lot of pro Biden commentary arguing that we’re better off than four years ago. However, that’s not what your average Joe is thinking. He’s thinking, are we better off than five years ago? 2019 was a good year for a lot of people, and there’s a perception that the Democrats would never let a year like that happen again.
He didn’t have much choice. The congressional votes were veto proof and he would have been torn apart by the democrat media even more than normal had he attempted to stop it.
It didn’t really matter. Either way this was forced on us, and the democrats still a managed to steal the election for Biden.no one really believes that. I doubt even Pluggo believes it. Despite his propaganda.
while the question of how best to measure inflation has no single and straightforward answer, one mystery has been clearly solved by Summers and his co-authors. People aren't crazy.
"While the question of how best to measure craziness has no single and straightforward answer, ...."
"If you disagree with me, you are crazy."
single and straightforward answer.
IF you live in Texas near the destroyed solar farm and fear about the damaging chemicals, wait -it gets worse thanks to an unthinking President
==================
"There's this enormous shell game happening by the Biden administration, by the environmental left, presenting wind and solar as perfectly green, clean, and carbon-neutral," Turner told Fox News Digital. "They use all of these buzzwords. But they're none of that and they also have enormous drawbacks. And it's doing the American people a great disservice to obfuscate these very obvious shortcomings."
He noted that, because solar panels are largely manufactured in China, the destruction of solar farms could be leveraged in geopolitical disputes between the U.S. and China.
"Why would we expect them to race to our aid when our grid is down nationwide, and they are the ones holding the goods that we need to get back up?" Turner said.
=====================
but that is a small area , you say with no idea what is going on
BLM proposes to open 22 million acres in Western states to solar development
China, chemcial leaks, energy failure and destruction to the environment unparalleled even if it works
Maybe I have just been reading too much von Mises, but I am increasingly disinclined to have the government do ANYTHING about inflation or deflation. Maybe they can do some good, but I would kinda like them to adopt 2 maxims:
1. When the government is unsure, it should do nothing.
2. The government should be presumptively unsure about anything.
The best presidents are the ones no one remembers because they were the ones who didn't do anything.
Anyone who believes Bidenomics works hasn't been to the grocery store lately.
This is the fault of the U.S. Government? lol. “Reason”, always chained to it’s corporate masters. Biden / Trump doesn’t matter. Idiots.
(Don't get me wrong, I hope Trump gets gang raped, but it has nothing to do with inflation)
Get fucked with a running rusty chain saw.
Prices up 25% in 4 years. Pay up 6%. If only I could use those two facts to figure out why people think the economy isn't working for them...
Joe continues to piss down our back and tell us it's raining. How stupid does he think we are? I'm tired of being told my reality isn't reality, and I think most people are tired of having their intelligence insulted by this small time crook.
Enjoy your retirement, Joe. In which part of China are you going to live?
It's not just the interest rates of housing that aren't being considered. When inflation is sky high, but wages aren't anywhere close to keeping up many consumers have to buy stuff on credit. With credit card interest rates at 20-35% and consumer debt at all-time highs, people are paying a lot more in credit card interest on top of paying a lot more for the same stuff.
Incorrect. Wages have risen faster than inflation.
Why are conservatives lying about the economy?
Jealousy.
D bullshit.
The little cons know the only way to get the execrable Trump re-elected is to lie, lie, and lie. They have nothing in terms of policy. They have nothing for the economy. They have nothing for the lives of Americans. But by lyinig, they slightly increase Trump's chances of completing the descent into 3rd world shithole status he started in his first term.
If that were true all it would accomplish is putting people into higher tax brackets so they pay a higher percent of their income to the government. Usually it math out to a net loss.
Want to go back to the terrible 2020?
Hire Trump again. We'll have it forever.
We certainly hope to get rid of D liars like you.
I notice the author didn't ask corporations if they like the record profits they're reaping and the record levels their stocks have reached. She didn't ask stockholders if they like the record dividend payouts they're receiving. Nor annuity purchasers, who can purchase an annuity for less, bondholders, who are pulling in better interest, and savings and IRA and CD account holders, also getting better returns. And she completely spins the report's finding that the 2.3% of people who bought a house last year are more than outweighed by the 97.7% who didn't.
If by "most" you mean all except the grifting elite, then yeah.