Ohio Republicans Drop Last-Minute Effort To Derail Voter-Approved Pot Legalization
As of today, adults 21 or older in the Buckeye State may possess up to 2.5 ounces of marijuana and grow up to six plants at home.

Marijuana legalization took effect today in Ohio, despite a last-minute attempt to override key parts of that voter-approved policy. The failure of that effort suggests that the Republicans who control the state legislature recognized the political perils of so blatantly defying voters' wishes.
Ohio, where legislators authorized medical use of marijuana in 2016, became the 24th state to legalize recreational use a month ago, when 57 percent of voters said yes to Issue 2. As of today, that ballot measure makes it legal for adults 21 or older to publicly possess 2.5 ounces or less of marijuana and grow up to six plants at home. Issue 2 also envisions a state-regulated cannabis industry with retail sales taxed at 10 percent. But as an initiated statute rather than a constitutional amendment, it can be revised by a simple majority of state legislators.
Before the election, Ohio Senate President Matt Huffman (R–Lima) said that if voters approved Issue 2, he would "advocate for reviewing things or repealing things or changing things that are in it." Although Huffman was not specific, a bill that the Senate General Government Committee overwhelmingly approved on Monday would have reduced the possession limit to one ounce, eliminated permission for homegrown marijuana, reduced the statewide cap on the number of retailers from 350 to 230, increased the retail tax to 15 percent, and imposed a 15 percent tax on growers. It also would have effectively recriminalized marijuana possession by banning possession of cannabis obtained outside of a state-authorized distribution system that might not be up and running until late 2024 or early 2025.
After hearing testimony against that controversial proposal on Tuesday and getting an earful from outraged constituents, the committee dramatically changed course. On Wednesday, it unanimously approved a bill that would retain Issue 2's possession limit, preserve the home cultivation option, and allow medical marijuana dispensaries to begin serving the recreational market in the near future, perhaps within a few months. The bill, which passed the Senate by a 28–2 vote, also goes beyond Issue 2 by requiring expungement of criminal records involving low-level marijuana possession.
During "the last three or four days," committee chair Michael Rulli (R–Youngstown) said, "a lot of the public has reached out to probably every single one of our senators with thousands of emails and hundreds and hundreds and hundreds of calls. I think the people have spoken." Republican Gov. Mike DeWine, who also opposed Issue 2, called the Senate-approved legislation "a very, very good bill," saying, "We have an obligation to follow the will of the people."
The amended Senate bill no longer includes a cultivation tax, but it still would raise the retail tax by 50 percent, meaning the state would be collecting 15 percent in addition to standard state and local sales taxes that average 7.24 percent. And unlike Issue 2, the bill would allow local governments to impose their own taxes, up to 3 percent.
Those additional tax burdens seem inconsistent with Republicans' professed goal of "stamping out the black market," as Sen. Rob McColley (R–Findlay) put it. "It's an imperative that this thing get passed," DeWine said. "What we don't want is a situation where the black market grows." Yet high taxes are one of the main factors that have made it difficult for state-licensed marijuana suppliers to compete with untaxed and unregulated dealers in states such as California.
In addition to the Senate bill, the Ohio House of Representatives is considering legislation that would restrict advertising, impose a 10 percent tax on growers' gross receipts, and bar people from "aggregating their home grow plants into a single location, in essence creating an unofficial cultivation facility." That bill, sponsored by Rep. Jamie Callender (R–Concord), also would nix an Issue 2 provision that allows adults to share up to 2.5 ounces of marijuana "without remuneration." In effect, the Marijuana Policy Project's Karen O'Keefe complains, the bill "recriminalizes passing a joint."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
>>Ohio ... became the 24th state to legalize recreational use
whatthefuck, Texas?
I Am Earning $81,100 so Far this year working 0nline and I am a full time college student and just working for 3 to 4 hours a day I've made such great m0ney.I am Genuinely thankful to and my administrator, It's' really user friendly and I'm just so happY that I found out about this...
I Worked Here ==> > http://Www.smartcareer1.com
We have to follow the will of the people but we can make the people wish they didn't demand what we don't approve of by making it as likely to fail as possible so we can say, "See? We told you so!" I thought politicians couldn't get any more childish, but I was wrong.
Some Republicans finally got a little bit brighter. Between marijuana legalization and abortion idiocy, even Ohio could vote D.
If Kansas can have a referendum preventing the legislature from banning abortion, and more states have referendums to legalize marijuana, pretty much so will every state in the union. Inflexible politicians are disposable, and the far right idealistic will be the first to go.
Why are Republicans so much against liberty?
why are Democrats?
Democrats want to criminalize one batch of things and Republucabs a different batch. Being a guy who likes guns and weed makes me hated by both. I see no real difference between them as both want to put me in jail.
a guy who likes guns and weed
Which describes most rural Ohioans. Which is why the initiative passed.
We passed it here in South Dakota. But through some legal wrangling the governor (Christy Noem) and the police unions got it squashed because we also passed medical Marijuana in the same election.
You see, ballot initiatives in South Dakota aren't supposed to cover more than one topic. So since the two separate initiatives were about Marijuana the Republican appointed judges stomped one of them. They claimed because the legalization got less votes than the medical the medical would stand and the legalization would be tossed out.
So much for will of the people. When it comes to having fun them God fearin' Republicans can't stand for it.
With Republicans, it's that they see liberty as zero-sum—the more freedom the little people have, the less wealth and power the bigwigs have. With Democrats, it's an ideology of haughtiness. They believe the leftist elites are intellectually and morally superior, and therefore human progress depends on them being in control.
Republicans and conservatives have lost the culture war, even in desolate, dysfunctional, can't-keep-up, half-educated, superstition-drenched stretches such as rural Ohio.
This is what makes America great.
I wonder if we could get Rand Paul to sponsor a constitutional amendment to grant Congress the authority to regulate drugs, in order to make the point that they're doing it illegally, now.
The sooner GOP leaders sober up and realize a growing majority of voters (even in red states) support marijuana legalization (and legalized abortion), the sooner the GOP will win key elections in purple states and districts.
So pretty much half the country has legal, recreational pot.
I wonder when/if all the states legalize it, will the Feds finally give in or will they still keep it illegal? Would it even matter if they did?
Side note - as a resident, bet Tennessee's will be last to legalize. We can't even get medical.
I don't know, I figured South Dakota would be 49th and North Dakota would be 50th but we actually passed both medical and recreational in 2020. I think it was because all the old Republicans stayed home because they didn't want to vote for Trump. But our courts decided we can't have both passing in the same year.