My Own Personal Evita
Plus: OpenAI apocalypse, New York's problematic pie, Backpage trial concludes, and more...

A self-described libertarian just won a presidency. In Argentina, Javier Milei—who proudly describes himself as a classical liberal and an anarcho-capitalist, ran on a libertarian platform, and named his pack of dogs after various free market economists—just beat Sergio Massa, a Peronist, to become president.
In turn, Milei has been described as a "populist" (by CNBC and the Associated Press and Politico), a "far-right outsider" (CNN), a "Trump-like libertarian" (The Washington Post), a "victory for [the] far right" (The New York Times), and, more amusingly, "Wolverine" (The Guardian). Some people have described this as evidence of democracy in peril, as if winning the most votes, after campaigning to convince the electorate of their competence, is somehow an example of an election being rigged. (Sometimes democracy means accepting outcomes you dislike!)
The libertarian "landed some 56% of the vote versus just over 44% for his rival, Peronist Economy Minister Sergio Massa," reports Reuters. It turns out that running for president as the person setting economic policy—in a place crippled by hyperinflation—isn't actually a winning strategy after all.
As recently as April 2020, "$1 bought 80 pesos," reports The New York Times. "This week, $1 bought nearly 1,000 pesos." Milei's platform advocates radical reforms to cure Argentina's fiscal woes. He says he will dollarize the country, shutter the central bank, and force massive spending cuts. In a clip that went viral, he talks about smashing tons of existing government ministries, such as the Ministry of Culture and the Ministry of Women, Genders, and Diversity. He has floated abortion bans and lifting regulations on gun ownership. He says only countries that actively "fight against socialism" should be allies.
He may be thwarted by his relative inexperience, his admitted status as a political outsider, and the fact that he doesn't have a large enough coalition of supporters in government to really pass many of the things he hopes to. His idiosyncratic ways, hardcore rhetoric, and dope sideburns also bolster the perception that he's an atypical politician not looked on kindly by much of the media.
"Today starts the rebuilding of Argentina," Milei said in his victory speech. "There's no room for gradual measures."
Check out the interview Zach Weissmueller and I conducted recently with Argentine political scientist Marcos Falcone on how a Milei presidency could turn Argentina's economic fate around; an interview Weissmueller conducted with Gloria Alvarez and Eduardo Marty on Milei's prospects; the Reason Roundtable episode where Matt Welch, Nick Gillespie, Peter Suderman, and Katherine Mangu-Ward explore the Milei rise; and Daniel Raisbeck's excellent piece on pundits' foolish comparisons between Milei and the Brazilian autocrat Jair Bolsonaro.
THE JAVIER MILEI MUSICAL IS GONNA BE WAY MORE FIRE THAN EVITA. pic.twitter.com/OHxQwBhXVW
— INVESTMENT HULK (@INVESTMENTSHULK) August 18, 2023
Consistently candid: On Friday at noon, OpenAI's board asked CEO Sam Altman to join a meeting. The board of the massively valued company, which makes ChatGPT, fired Altman on the spot. Greg Brockman, OpenAI's president and one of Altman's cofounders, had not been invited to the meeting; he was fired from the board and subsequently resigned from the company.
The board released almost no reasoning for their decision, saying only that Altman "was not consistently candid in his communications with the board, hindering its ability to exercise its responsibilities" and that "the board no longer has confidence in his ability to continue leading OpenAI." Internally, little more was communicated to employees. Chief technology officer Mira Murati was appointed interim CEO, and speculation swirled as to why Altman had been dismissed, why so many top decision makers had been blindsided by this, and what the company's future would look like. (Disclosure: My husband works for OpenAI.)
In the days prior, Altman had been going about business as usual. He'd been widely considered a rising star in Silicon Valley, the subject of attempted hit pieces and lots of lore. After the dismissal by the board—comprised currently of Chief Scientist Ilya Sutskever, Quora CEO Adam D'Angelo, GeoSim Systems CEO Tasha McCauley, and Georgetown's Helen Toner, who directs strategy and grants at the school's Center for Security and Emerging Technology—it became clear that investors, employees, and a hefty chunk of leadership did not support the decision.
Murati and others started attempting to get Altman to come back:
first and last time i ever wear one of these pic.twitter.com/u3iKwyWj0a
— Sam Altman (@sama) November 19, 2023
Late last night, this move was swatted away. Murati was dismissed and replaced by new CEO Emmett Shear (formerly of Twitch), and Altman was hired by Microsoft, which has invested $13 billion in OpenAI.
Shear is not widely regarded as a competent pick, and the middle-of-the-night move is being cited as more evidence that the board does not know what it's doing:
He does video streaming ffs
— Kara Swisher (@karaswisher) November 20, 2023
So, here's what happened at OpenAI tonight. Mira planned to hire Sam and Greg back. She turned Team Sam over past couple of days. Idea was to force board to fire everyone, which they figured the board would not do. Board went into total silence. Found their own CEO Emmett Shear
— Ashlee Vance (@ashleevance) November 20, 2023
Shear is widely seen as a decel—that is, someone who wants to slow down the rate of progress in artificial intelligence:
Hmmmm but I am actually in favor of a pause? Or rather, I'm in favor of a slowdown. We can't learn how to build a safe AI without experimenting, and we can't experiment without progress, but we probably shouldn't be barreling ahead at max speed either.
— Emmett Shear (@eshear) September 16, 2023
I specifically say I'm in favor of slowing down, which is sort of like pausing except it's slowing down.
If we're at a speed of 10 right now, a pause is reducing to 0. I think we should aim for a 1-2 instead.— Emmett Shear (@eshear) September 16, 2023
Why did this happen? "The board did *not* remove Sam over any specific disagreement on safety, their reasoning was completely different from that," wrote Emmett Shear on X. The board has released no additional reasoning about what Altman might have done to warrant this treatment.
The employees at OpenAI just lost billions of dollars in secondary share sales that were about to happen at a $90b valuation — that's over. Done.
I think OpenAI will lose half their employees, the 12-18 month lead, and 90% of their valuation in 2024.
Just insane value…
— @jason (@Jason) November 20, 2023
Now, Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella has poached Altman and Brockman. Several top developers resigned immediately in the wake of the Altman news:
Microsoft just acquired OpenAI without acquiring OpenAI. And made it fully for-profit without making it fully for-profit. Satya plays 4D Chess.
— Gaurav Munjal (@gauravmunjal) November 20, 2023
Lots of employees are locked out of their computers as of this morning. The company is in complete disarray. And Sutskever, thought to be the main person leading the ouster, just bizarrely tweeted this:
I deeply regret my participation in the board's actions. I never intended to harm OpenAI. I love everything we've built together and I will do everything I can to reunite the company.
— Ilya Sutskever (@ilyasut) November 20, 2023
The vast majority of the employees have signed a letter urging the board to resign and threatening to flee to Microsoft, which has jobs available for them:
Breaking: 550 of 700 employees @OpenAI tell the board to resign. pic.twitter.com/PvIG4lM5cT
— Kara Swisher (@karaswisher) November 20, 2023
In short: Altman was removed via board coup, which the unique governance structure of OpenAI allows, with no reasoning stated. Now there's a mutiny by employees who have lost all faith in the board, and Microsoft is masticating the delicious pieces.
I read the news that Sam Altman is joining Microsoft, and the first thing I thought about is Paul Graham's description of Sam: "You could parachute him into an island full of cannibals and come back in 5 years and he'd be the king."
So basically 5 years until he's CEO? https://t.co/GDTSMoNZTn
— Leo Polovets (@lpolovets) November 20, 2023
Scenes from New York:
In 2008, famed New York City pastry chef Christina Tosi opened up Milk Bar with seed money provided by Momofuku boss David Chang. Now, in 2023, they've finally realized the error in their pie-naming ways:
i hate it here pic.twitter.com/LWH47BcONK
— Mike Solana (@micsolana) November 20, 2023
QUICK HITS
- Reason's Matt Welch on "the government's fanatical pursuit of [Backpage executive Michael] Lacey" (and why the media have been ignoring it).
- We should disregard any and all regulations this person comes up with:
The head of our government's AI strategy ….
"who wants to work on tech policy if you actually have to understand how these microscopic things work"
— martin_casado (@martin_casado) November 17, 2023
- RIP:
Our co-founder, former U.S. First Lady Rosalynn Carter, passed away this afternoon in Plains, Georgia.
For more information: https://t.co/82bHoZQvkk pic.twitter.com/2exvnQdtab
— The Carter Center (@CarterCenter) November 19, 2023
- "Is this what a soft landing looks like, or are we simply going from boom into the hard bounce of a recession?" asks Joe Weisenthal at Bloomberg.
- Beautiful:
The triumph of neoliberal trade policy, Hanukkah edition. pic.twitter.com/6e2vdbUU1U
— Richard Morrison (@RichardMorrison) November 19, 2023
- This:
I feel like a lot of people talk about Capitalism the way previous generations used to talk about The Devil pic.twitter.com/JzDkAt5zTr
— Armand Domalewski (@ArmandDoma) November 19, 2023
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Fuck Joe Biden
Trump is going to win.
They'll kill him this time.
I'm making over $7k a month working component time. I saved hearing other people inform me how lots cash they could make online so I decided to look at it. Well, it turned into all proper and has definitely modified my life.
This is what I do ══════►►► http://Www.Smartcareer1.com
They have no alternative.
I’am making over $20k a month working online. I kept seeing how some people are able to earn a lot of money online, so I decided to look into it. I had luck to stumble upon something that totally changed my life. After 2 months of searching, last month I received a paycheck for $19683 for just working on the laptop for a few hours weekly. And best thing is..It’s so Easy…
.
.
.
HERE————————≻≻≻≻≻ https://tinyurl.com/2castxre
And that will be the end of them. If there is a popular uprising there is no way the government, plus a bunch of woketards could stop it.
Will it be on Netflix?
Dan Goldman on Donald Trump: “It is just unquestionable at this point that he cannot see public office again. He is not only unfit. He is destructive to our democracy. He has to be eliminated.”
(emphasis mine)
https://twitter.com/alx/status/1726642802640220361
And bobble head bitch keeps agreeing with him.
Cuz nothing says protecting democracy like eliminating your opponents.
Remember these are the same folks who think taking power away from unelected bureaucrats and returning it to elected officials is also a threat to democracy.
And they’re supported by the thugs who think that peacefully protesting government overreach (e.g., lockdown orders) is “fascism”. And utterly with no sense of blackshirt irony.
But remember,Palin putting cross hairs on congressional districts that she felt the GOP should be targeting to flip was an actual call for violence.
Here's some of that "eliminationist" rhetoric the left always accused the non-left of employing.
Democrats and "traditional" Republicans are pushing Nikki Haley. They can't lose: either Biden wins outright against her (she is quite unlikable to most independents and Republicans), or they get a neocon and globalist in power as a consolation prize.
The fact that one or the other will likely win (barring a very public mental breakdown or an assassination) is pretty depressing.
I know, right? Very sad. Why can't we do better than two geriatric assholes?
And what do you propose, Jeffy? Any candidate you like better?
Ya know, your purpose here really does seem to follow me around and troll me and try to bait me.
So why should I respond to you in good faith?
Hardly anybody here agrees with you on anything. Wouldn't that make you the troll?
No, this is a classic liberal/libertarian site. You Trump Cultists are the trolls.
You and Jeff seem angry that nobody buys your DNC narratives.
I don't often see anyone here post in support of Trump beyond a rational position. I do see you and others shit post about Trump, mostly ignoring his policy positions. I have seen you post repeatedly (doggedly) in support of the current administration and economy. Logically, that means you are not a classic liberal/libertarian. What are you doing here?
I don’t often see anyone here post in support of Trump beyond a rational position.
lol there's plenty of people who deflect on behalf of Trump
Name them and give citations with links, Jeffy.
"lol there’s plenty of people who deflect on behalf of Trump"
All I've seen is you defending grooming of children.
Hey Fatfuck, take the L, and move on.
Strange cultists we make. We criticize Trump on issues. Some of us did not vote for him in 2016, others did not vote for him in 2020. No one here seems to salivate over Trump the way some here have over Biden and the Democrats. And only a few have gone gaga over Covid restrictions and the like. Those few would include people like you, Pluggo. Seems to me that you're the actual cultist here.
No, you’re a raging pedophile who got banned here for posting child rape videos. You’re not even supposed to be here at all. Let alone unincarcerated. You are the troll by default.
Fatfuck too. Maybe you two can have a CP binge party and jack each other off.
Now the resident sadistic Nazi Elmer is here. What fun. The piece of shit has a Final Solution for every group but his.
No, he has a final solution for pederasts like yourself. Most honest, normal people share that with Elmer.
Nazi? I hate all forms of socialism. If anything, a Soros worshipping faggot pedophile, such as yourself, is a Nazi.
And I would prefer to leave everyone alone. But scumbags like you make that impossible.
Just kill yourself Pluggo. You it’s the right thing to do.
Now, be fair, we all bait you because a) you take it so well, and b) you're an idiot. It's not just me.
Only to TDS-addled shits
That is "self described Joe Biden" to you and me bub.
I was hoping Liz would be pumping the massive Hamas tunnels under that hospital.
A self-described libertarian just won a presidency.
The countdown to disappointment begins.
They are already disappointed.
Only closeted leftists in libertarian skin suits avoid the “self described” disclaimer.
It is in the Reason stylebook.
You don't think he means it?
Like all libertarianism, his intentions will turn out irrelevant.
Hope springs eternal.
Yeah. Anti-abortion and he wants to keep the safety nets. Sounds like the makings of the Ceauçescu of the Global South.
Ceauçescu was totally cool with aborting Romania's huge Gypsy population.
Not if they could supply cannon-fodder for his Alexandrian dream of a 200 million-man Macedonian Army. Even anti-abortion David Funderburk vouched for and winced at Ceauçescu's megalomaniacal baby rabies.
Thinking how different the Millei writeup would have been with ENB.
"DEMOCRAACY IS OVER!!!"
would probably sum it up
Or, heaven forbid, a Sullum Roundup regarding Milei.
At least 50 references to Trump.
LOL! Sullum would have more references to Trump in an article about Milei than he would about Milei.
Trump-like libertarian
The biggest, most beautiful non-aggression you've ever seen. Everyone is saying it. It's going to be a tremendous thing.
He is Trump-like in that he's willing to say outrageous and aggressive things that piss people off. But that's about it. He's actually smart and consistent and principled as far as I can see.
What was inconsistent about Trumps campaign? Millei hasn't reached the point of dealing with an embedded socialist government against him yet. As Liz states, working his proposals will take work. The Peron party is entrenched in various places of government just like The Resistance was.
What was inconsistent about Trumps campaign?
Drain the Swamp vs Cares Act.
Best president in the last 100 years ain't good enough for TDS-addled shits.
It's not good enough. Look at where we are now. Tallest midget is still a midget.
Unfortunately the world is populated by midgets, so the tallest midget is actually a giant:
https://committeetounleashprosperity.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/CTUP_BurdenisBack_ComparingRegulatoryCosts.pdf
I mean, come on, negative numbers for change in regulatory costs? And not just negative, but in magnitude comparable to the increases in costs others imposed? Meaning he was as good as the others have been bad. How much better could Trump have done?
Those things are good. But good enough is actually shrinking the government. That's the standard I'm going to stick to.
(R)esearch and (D)evelopment both fought T every day.
Isn't it possible that in the amount of time he had, given the people he had to work with, that was as much as could be done? You do understand the executive can't legislate, don't you? That the regulations are constrained by acts of Congress?
Yes, of course I understand that. And I agree that he is likely the best among people likely to be elected president for libertarians.
But I remain unconvinced that he has a particularly libertarian view of what government should be. Yes, the regulation reduction was good. Maybe he can do more, I hope he gets a chance at it. I'll believe it when I see it.
Zeb, ot would be a lot easier if Americans simply figured out that democrats are existential enemies and need to wiped out. But barring that, electing someone like Trump appears to be the only viable option.
Unless you have a better idea?
Anyone who signed off on the Cares Act is an enemy of liberty. He could be the best president in 100 years and he'd still be the enemy of liberty.
^this
An absolute disgrace. Naked plundering of the people's wealth.
I'm curious what you think the possible alternative was.
Trump vetoes, bill goes back and still passes basically unanimously, Trump is labeled enemy of "the people" by both sides, during a "crisis". And, we're talking about Trump here. Not a Libertarian. Trump looks out for Trump and only Trump. So, what could Trump, or some other hypothetical person done?
A case of damned if you do, damned if you don't.
No need for hypothetical, Rand Paul voted against it and faught Fauci through the whole thing. Came out smelling like a rose despite taking heat.
But as for Trump he could have not championed the bill and attacked Thomas Massie prior to the damn thing even passing.
And most importantly, he could have put the welfare of America over his political career. But nope he followed the Swamps lead instead of being the leader he claimed to be.
He wasn't on the 2020 ballot either.
Rand Paul voted against it and faught Fauci through the whole thing. Came out smelling like a rose despite taking heat.
Is that so?
The chamber approved the plan to combat the outbreak as the crisis started to thin its ranks. Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., did not vote after testing positive for COVID-19, and neither did GOP Sens. Mitt Romney and Mike Lee of Utah, both in isolation after contact with their colleague. Sen. John Thune of South Dakota, the second-ranking Republican, also missed the vote after feeling ill.
CNBC seems to think otherwise. Maybe he planned to vote “no”, I have no reason to doubt that, but he apparently wasn’t able to make the vote.
We probably ought to remember that Trump was not a passive bystander here.
https://web.archive.org/web/20201006071716/https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/488527-mcconnell-introduces-third-coronavirus-relief-proposal/
Senate Republicans have reached a deal among themselves on legislation for the third coronavirus funding package amid growing concerns about a widespread outbreak in the United States.
(this is what eventually became the CARES Act)
[...]
The direct cash assistance, which is backed by Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin, earned fierce pushback among some members of the caucus. But GOP senators indicated that it had too much support to be removed from the package offered by McConnell and other top Republicans.
[...]
The administration has agreed to send a handful of administration officials, including Mnuchin, up to the Capitol starting on Friday to take part in the negotiations.
So the Trump admin was a direct player in the negotiations for the CARES Act.
Also:
Stimulus package could top $2 trillion as negotiators look to clear final major hurdles
https://web.archive.org/web/20200322043902/https://www.cnn.com/2020/03/21/politics/stimulus-package-negotiations-congress-coronavirus/index.html
Bipartisan groups of senators worked late into Friday night with top officials from President Donald Trump's administration to lock in a final agreement -- a deal that people directly involved in the negotiations tell CNN could top a cost of $1.5 trillion -- before falling short of a midnight deadline imposed by Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell.
[...]
The urgency of the moment was apparent throughout the day and night Friday, with senators assigned to specific subject areas cloistered in a web of hearing rooms in a Senate office building, as Kudlow, Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin and Labor Secretary Eugene Scalia shuffling between rooms in an effort to make progress across a sweeping range of stimulus and emergency aid options.
Trump told reporters Saturday at an afternoon briefing on coronavirus that "we are getting close" to reaching a deal on a proposal, and negotiators are expected to continue discussions throughout Saturday as they look to clinch a final agreement.
Trump didn't veto the CARES Act because his admin was in the room negotiating on its terms and the final product is something that he approved of.
Trump should be criticized "bigly" for his part in pushing the Cares Act. I certainly do. But I notice you almost never seem to criticize the Democrats involved in pushing it. Why is that?
We all know why.
I have argued against everyone who was in favor of it, Democrats and Republicans.
What I don't do is pretend that Trump was some innocent bystander who had no choice but to sign the deal that Congress gave him.
And covid policy in general.
At the very least I'd want to see a real commitment to actual reductions in government size and spending before I called him any kind of libertarian. I can agree that Trump was the preferable available option, but he's no kind of libertarian, despite a few good moves.
But Zeb, you don’t understand.
All the things that Trump did that were not libertarian, were not his fault. It was always someone else’s fault.
But all the things that Trump did that were vaguely libertarian, were totally because of him. It was all him. He’s the real deal.
Therefore Trump is the bestest of the best libertarians!
Since when did anyone here actually say that? And use citations and links.
He’s just angry that Trump really was somewhat libertarian, and that Trump may actually get elected again.
Jeffy is an angry Marxist Fatfuck pedophile adjacent sea lion.
He’s just being dishonest. It’s what he does.
I'm well aware. If he provides the names and actual citations, they're verifiable. If not, then he's obviously defecting and obfuscating. Either way, the newbies and lurkers can see what he's up to.
True. We don’t beat up on Fatfuck to engage him. It’s for everyone else.
Yesterday he declared that he and Buttplug had a right to lie because people were lying about them being pedophiles and groomers.
Lol, doesn’t surprise me.
Even though they are absolutely pedophiles and groomers.
That right there is a lie.
These things only occur in your imagination. Personally, I think we should vote for any candidate that moves us towards more limited government and liberty, even if fractionally. I also appreciate some level of morality and ethics, although I don't expect perfection. I have not seen a similar sentiment from you, sarc, et al. Which is why you are continuously mocked.
I agree. There is to much reliance on perfection rather than correct direction. With an embedded state constantly fighting, reform can't happen in 4 years when it built up through 150 years. The expectation is just weird.
One step is better than no steps, but people criticize government wasn't reformed in a single term.
Rome wasn't built in a day. Dismantling it without destroying it will probably take longer.
Maybe it's six of one, half dozen of the other. I'll liken it to a store remodel. You can close the store down for a full remodel, but you risk alienating some of your customers who want you open all the time; or you can keep the store open during the remodel and work around the shoppers, thus possibly alienating those shoppers who hate being around the barriers and the work crews.
Each has its drawbacks and advantages.
It’s either that or take over and start rounding up leftists. Which is probably the only way to fix things at this point.
I just can’t see how we survive with millions of aggressively treasonous leftists running wild. Something has to be done about them. Maybe we can ship them somewhere one way. Is there another Australia out there?
Is there another Australia out there?
Send them to colonize Venus.
Venus? Ok. And if the rockets transporting them go off course straight into the sun…..
Oh well.
I figure it's warm enough for them at over 800F, 96% CO2, and a pressure at sea level far higher than here on Earth.
As for rounding up leftists, just apply the Golden Rule 2.0: treat people as they would treat you.
Personally, I think we should vote for any candidate that moves us towards more limited government and liberty, even if fractionally.
But you can say that about any candidate, at least on some level.
So the question is, which candidate will move us furthest in the direction of limited government and liberty. And it's hard to argue that either Team Red or Team Blue is going to win on that score.
Well, given that Team Blue tends to have more people who want to grow government faster, and were the ones behind all the Covid restriction crap, I think it's easier to argue than you may think. That is, unless you're simping for Team Blue.
What has Biden done to move us to a more limited government and liberty, lol?
Normalized pedophilia urges.
No it is not.
His general covid policy was federalist. States chose their actions.
His operation warp speed and allowing Fauci so much publicity was wrong. But he was anti mandates and left it to a federalist system. Overall his policies were better than what dems and media demanded.
There were very few politicians involved that were better.
I'd limit better to Rand Paul and Massie, just from guessing.
I despise Trump for a zillion reasons. But that doesn't make him the worst candidate, and waiting for better is how you get worse election results. I live in CA, and my vote makes no difference, so I have the luxury of being able to vote Libertarian. If I lived in a swing state, damn right I'd vote for Trump.
Your vote doesn’t count because of the surplus of Marxists. Something must be done about that.
I've never said it wasn't better than the available alternatives. It still sucked.
Liz is far from a left libertarian. Also within. T a
If trump can get just one democrat to move to Canada it will be worth electing him.
It doesn’t have to be any specific dem, but my preference would be that pink haired dyke former soccer player.
A few “cardiac events” among the fauci faithful could be accelerated by a trump win as well (looking at you, Madonna) so there’s a lot to like there.
I stated campaign. Right now Millei is purely campaign. He hasn't faced the resistance. I was against Cares. I hated he supported it. But it was passed with super majorities in congress so I blame them for it, not him.
Yes, they were going to spend something huge no matter what. At least what we got included a big chunk back to taxpayers, in cash — the least damaging way for money to be spent.
His words and actions were for the Cares Act. He could have tried to stop it, instead he championed it. So he gets just as much blame for it as every other asshole. Shit, he personally attacked Thomas Massie for actually being against it.
Bigly yuge boot hat!
🙂
😉
How much more Russian influence can we take?
How the feds pay Newsguard to censor.
https://realclearwire.com/articles/2023/11/15/newsguard_surrogate_the_feds_pay_to_keep_watch_on_the_internet_and_be_a_judge_of_the_truth_992214.html
It’s okay for government to censor speech when they do it through a third party, because it might be rUsSiaN diSiNfOrmAti0n.
"For example, as is public, our work for the Pentagon’s Cyber Command is focused on the identification and analysis of information operations targeting the U.S. and its allies conducted by hostile governments, including Russia and China. Our analysts alert officials in the U.S. and in other democracies, including Ukraine, about new false narratives targeting America and its allies, and we provide an understanding of how this disinformation spreads online. We are proud of our work countering Russian and Chinese disinformation on behalf of Western democracies."
Corporatism isn't fascism - jeff and sarc.
Notice no comment on this story from him. But he’s busy above bitching about Trump.
Jeffy wants a world order in the image of George Soros’s vision of an ‘open society’. Which is his user friendly term for global neo Marxism. While referring to himself as a libertarian, when there is nothing libertarian about him.
This is also why he and Pluggo are friends and allies.
Also an emergency. And for the left everything is an emergency. Therefore extreme measures are not just allowed but required.
The link between major news outlets and the Hamas propagandists they utilize.
https://twitter.com/mishtal/status/1726155955644006809
Something has gone seriously wrong in the way news is reported from Gaza.
Looks to me like they are following the preferred government narrative in the US and Europe.
"Everyone knew Hamas was using the hospitals"
Yet those same 'everyone' never once noted that knowledge made those hospitals legitimate military targets.
Because dishonesty is what they do.
Because dishonesty is what they do.
Exactly. Hamas is like Turd.
Hamas lies. Hamas lies when they know they're lying. Hamas lies when we know they're lying. Hamas lies when they know we know they're lying. Hamas lies and is full of pederasts besides.
Oh, that was inspired. It fits Hamas.
New J6 video shows Capitol officers firing gas and munitions into J6 crowd before violence broke out.
This often causes a reaction in large crowds and is against crowd policies.
https://twitter.com/InvestigateJ6/status/1699455735288021400
All of these latest videos pretty much confirm that the Speakers Office and the FBI took an ordinary crowd comprised of both MAGA protesters and regular visitors and using at least two dozen agent provocateurs and the Hill Police deliberately manufactured a riot.
Almost everyone we see actually breaking windows and calling to infiltrate the hill have never been charged, most of the officers testifying under oath that they were injured are shown on the video to be lying, and we instead see video of Hill Police ushering people in, opening doors and escorting them to the chamber.
Almost everyone we see actually breaking windows and calling to infiltrate the hill have never been charged
Do you have evidence for this claim?
Do you have evidence otherwise, Jeffy?
Go play in the street.
Pissy this morning after you got your ass kicked here over the weekend?
I'm not interested in your trolling today.
So sayeth the troll himself.
Fatfuck, you’re done. Now GTFO.
You’re just a fat Marxist troll that wishes he could get away with fucking children.
>>I’m not interested in your trolling today.
wins the Hey Kettle, You're Black! Love, The Pot award of all-time.
Yes. The videos of the protest.
So, from these videos, you have determined the identities of the individuals who broke the windows, you have determined that these identities are known to the authorities, and you have determined that these individuals have not been arrested or charged even though they are known to the authorities?
You would agree that it's OK to shoot one of them who was trying to stop another, unnamed, unarrested person from breaking a window?
I posted some of those videos yesterday Jeff, but you refused to watch them. If you had you would have seen that most are very identifiable.
Now, go watch them and stop telling lies.
Narrator: But in the end, Lying Jeffy never did stop telling lies.
Or stop binging on 55 gallon drums of Ben & Jerry’s.
He could gain the monicker tubby
Yes.
So who are those individuals?
Hold on.
Are you saying that WE have to identify the people in the videos or it doesn't count?
Your claim:
Almost everyone we see actually breaking windows and calling to infiltrate the hill have never been charged
How are you planning on proving this claim?
“…..are known to the authorities….”
They don’t seem to have any problems identifying anyone else who was there.
FFS man, you really do deserve all the crap you get.
Shocking nobody, soros funds the groups that have resulted in recent violent protests.
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/dnc-protests-israel-left-wing-dark-money-network
Soros: "I worked for the Nazis as a teenager, I have always publicly stated that I have never identified as a Jew (though I think I might be a god), and now watch me give big money to these violent, pro-Hamas protesters"
Buttplug: "Criticizing Soros is antisemitic"
Soros was literally a Nazi and is most definitely not Jewish. I don't know how anyone could believe he has good intentions.
Just ask Pluggo. Of course, with Pluggo, consider the source.
Q: Is this what a soft landing looks like, or are we simply going from boom into the hard bounce of a recession?
A: Uh, the former. Next question?
Fuckin bidenomics rules, man.
Lol.
https://justthenews.com/politics-policy/education/major-new-jersey-education-union-pushes-end-basic-skills-test-requirement
The New Jersey Senate and state Assembly passed a bill in June that would allow the State Education Board to issue an alternative certificate to a teacher candidate who meets all eligibility requirements except for the requirement to achieve a minimum basic reading, writing and math skills test score.
… meets all eligibility requirements except for the requirement to achieve a minimum basic reading, writing and math skills test score.
What other requirements are there?
Fictional pronoun usage.
Narrative pushing and indoctrination.
DEI and land acknowledgement pledges.
Being able to read an analog clock.
All the rest of the stuff they require you to go to college to get a teaching degree for.
You don't need to know your *subject*, you need to know the latest teaching trends and pedagogy along with needing a period of observation to ensure you display the right traits and say the right things.
What other requirements are there?
The three r’s
racism
Racism
RACISM
Taking it up the ass like a little man.
*cough*Educational Civil Union*cough*
We should disregard any and all regulations this person comes up with...
Reason under KMW is a minion of Skynet.
And one reason we like Liz here in the commentariat.
https://twitter.com/LizWolfeReason/status/1726445410049224882
Have you considered taking a pill for your TDS
In reaction to this:
The Washington Post
@washingtonpost
Trump-like libertarian Javier Milei set to win Argentina’s presidency
So... we have to conclude that Trump is a libertarian after all?
When the mags favorite libertarian is Polis, I think so.
Liz should hang out in the commentariat.
BBC and CNN already describe him as a "far-right politician". Practically a Nazi.
I wonder if they're as good as Jeff at explaining what qualifies someone as “far-right".
It usually means "bogeyman" or "someone-we-don't-like" nowadays and I've even seen it applied to Glen Greenwald and Bret Weinstein.
"Far right" means "anybody to the right of neo-Marxists", i.e., the more leftist half of the Democratic party.
Look who's talking, you don't even know what a Nazi is
And what, do tell, is you definition of "far right", Jeffy? Please, enlighten us.
Please explain what a Nazi is.
Well, according to ML, I am a "Nazi" because I support limited government, reducing the welfare state, reducing entitlements, reducing regulations, expanding individual liberty and individual choice - but I'm not a social conservative like him, so that makes me a "Nazi".
You failed to answer the question and once again deflected.
Please explain what a Nazi is, not what you claim is someone else's definition.
He’s not going to answer. He’s not going to explain what far right is. He’s not going to answer if the pro-Hamas rioters should have all been killed for trespassing.
Jeffy is a typical leftist. He won’t define anything, then use some completely disingenuous strawman to deflect.
Hold his fat feet to the fire.
Why should I answer your bad-faith questions whose only purpose is to bait and troll me?
Bad faith question? You're deliberately obfuscating and avoiding the question.
Again, dip, please explain what a Nazi is, not what you claim is someone else’s definition.
In this particular case, the mere fact that you are even asking me is an exercise in bad faith - it is burden-shifting. I am asking ML for his definition because he is the one continually accusing me of being a Nazi. You are flipping the question around in order to deflect and defend your pal.
That is why it is bad faith. That's why you asked in the first place.
It isn’t. The problem is you, because you’re a vile leftist piece of shit. You are not libertarian. You are a leftist.
I have not seen you advocate for any of those things. In fact, the exact opposite. Also, you didn't answer my question.
I have also never seen him support those, but in fact support the opposite every time. He also supports state use if lawfare. Supports jailing those who protest says violence or vandalism. Has stated welfare will end only when people donate enough money that he deems correct. Etc.
“I support limited government, reducing the welfare state, reducing entitlements, reducing regulations, expanding individual liberty and individual choice”
I have never seen you once support any of those things here.
I have however, seen you support Nazi Race Theory with the villains flipped, fascist economics and corporatism, I’ve watched you defend censorship and political arrests, and support the policies at the bedrock of Aktion T4 and Kirchenkampf.
You ARE a Nazi, Jeff. An actual old school Nazi.
I have however, seen you support Nazi Race Theory with the villains flipped,
prove it, with citations.
every time I ask you to do this, you refuse. because you cannot.
because you are LYING. you get a thrill out of calling me a Nazi. that's all.
Accusations against you are regularly proven true here.
So stop lying. Or better yet, leave forever.
I have never seen you once support any of those things here.
not surprised - you choose not to see them
You’re a liar, and a pedophile supporter. Your sole ally here is an unrepentant pedophile.
“Gender affirming care” for minors, covid hysteria, and throwing open the borders to all the third world poverty that can get here cancels out any reasonably sane notion you may have had about anything.
Please explain what a Nazi is.
you're a Nazi.
So sayeth the racist pederast.
Bill Clinton on Israel & Hamas
"Hamas is really smart. When they decide to rocket Israel, they insinuate themselves in the hospitals, in the schools, in the highly populous areas."
https://twitter.com/SiaKordestani/status/1724131534121374130?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1724131534121374130%7Ctwgr%5E88fcb77194a7cec8a88985d955f419a1ae22c399%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Ftownhall.com%2Ftipsheet%2Fkatiepavlich%2F2023%2F11%2F19%2Fa-reminder-about-how-palestinians-operatefrom-bill-clinton-n2631389
"far right" in journalism-speak means anything that isnt a full fledged bolshevik
L - - - C - - - R
It should look like this. Unfortunately, what we currently have is:
L- - - - - - - - - - - - - - C - - - - R
Wow! Look how far off to the right that R is!
Having to force the administration to follow the law and follow through with leases. Rig count not available for comment.
https://www.thecentersquare.com/national/article_3a053b52-8716-11ee-b944-3f5f49b1d527.html
Yet shrike was just giving Joe credit for energy production against yesterday. Sure every policy Joe signs is against said production, but because it happened during his time it counts. Courts and leases signed under Trump are Joe's win.
How quickly the lessons of yesterday are forgotten.
It's almost like there was a push in the U.S. to get off our addiction to foreign oil. Almost as if there was an example in living memory on why relying on nations at least somewhat hostile to the United States to provide basic energy for Americans could be a mistake.
Or maybe, like Bernie says, bread lines are good.
"Our co-founder, former U.S. First Lady Rosalynn Carter, passed away this afternoon in Plains, Georgia."
Finally she can rest in peace, free from the constant media demands to denounce her election denier, conspiracy theorist, disinformation spreader husband.
C'mon Sandra..."denier" only works in one direction.
Real headline,
Retard progressive dies, a good start"
Was she killed by a rabbit while canoeing?
That's why you always need to carry the Holy Hand Grenade of Antioch with you.
"Look at the bones, Man!!"
🙂
😉
Referencing the time then president Carter was canoeing and started whacking his paddle a rabbit that was swimming towards him. WaPo had a story about it. Must have been a hare raising experience.
Later that day a bear crawled into their trunk. That’s when things really got interesting.
Oh, you remember that too? That was hilarious!
🙂
😉
Southern comedian and columnist Lewis Grizzard had a questionnaire for Jimmy after that incident, with questions like:
"When you were little, did you have 'friends' that weren't really there? Were any of them rabbits?"
🙂
😉
Was that the same bunny that now handles Joe Biden?
"The kiosk in my temporal lobe is shaped like Rosalyn Carter" - Cedric Bixler-Zavala
When Jimmy goes watch for the canonization the media puts on.
Ah shit, it's gonna be wall-to-wall St. Jimmy this and St. Jimmy that shit. Never mind that Jimmy fucked up the response to inflation - only good thing he did was nominate Volcker after fucking up majorly. Never mind that Jimmy so thoroughly fucked up Iran that they hate us to this very day - first by letting the Shah in for treatment, then by not returning him, then with the asinine security of the embassy, then with the "rescue" effort. In fact, the mullahs hated Jimmy so much, they waited until the exact second he was out of office to release the hostages. Mr. Malaise Speech could never seem to get it through his peanut-addled head that he was way in over his head and that he kept fucking up the responses.
He did greenlight some really decent weapons systems. Really, he started a lot of the post Vietnam military modernization. Yeah, a lot of those programs had been in R&D before he became President but he did approve them for production.
True that. There were some good things; however, some of his fuckups were epic fuckups.
For statist Argentinians, thus could get messi.
I hope the country doesn't get plunged into civil war if he actually follows through on his promise to slash the state by half. And frankly, I wouldn't put it past the Obama-worshipping scum in the CIA to try to make it happen if it doesn't happen organically. Every worthless goldbricking government shitbag on the planet has a massive vested interest in not allowing Milei to succeed even a little bit.
+2 points for using goldbricking.
Every worthless goldbricking government shitbag on the planet has a massive vested interest in not allowing Milei to succeed even a little bit.
This is the perfect summation of the situation in every country.
I hope Milei is able to actually do some good. I really didn't think the Peronists would let him win.
Just waiting for his untimely death.
If he actually tries to carry out his stated agenda he damn well better have top-notch personal bodyguards, because it's a distinct possibility.
i think you mean 'tragic suicide'
"Clintoncide".
Arkancide.
He might shoot himself in the back of the head...twice.
I also hope Milei is able to do some good.
But man that video clip of him above, looks like it could have been scripted by some of our more unhinged commenters around here.
He'd better not turn into just another South American strongman dictator.
Because that would make him worse than his predecessor?
If he ended up being a literal dictator? Yes.
OK, if Milei were to become a dictator, what kid of dictator would he be? Obviously not like Juan Peron, and I just don't see him pulling a Pinochet.
Really?
That’s it? That’s your criteria for bad?
Not ‘running the country into the ground for personal benefit’? That guy was ok – because wasn’t a dictator?
But Peron was ok?
Dictators are bad, m'kay?
Are you arguing that a dictatorship is preferable if it means a socialist doesn't get elected?
Depends what actions the dictator takes. But no surprise you’re simping for socialism.
Perhaps they should have reluctantly voted for the Peronist.
You’re one of our more unhinged commenters around here. You amd the other pedophile. Plus the shit eater.
I doubt he does much good. Pinochet had to go to extremes to get Chile on the right track and what do Chileans do? They vote in a socialist at the first opportunity. The latest, they voted in a left wing "student leader" because their subway fares went up.
Peronismo, goofy as it is, runs deep in Argentinians.
Javier Milei—who proudly describes himself as a classical liberal and an anarcho-capitalist
And a big fan of US Dollar hegemony and our Federal Reserve.
Of course if he wants a stable currency he picked the right one. Chances of Argentina actually adopting the US Dollar and not just a peg? Zero. But he does claim to be a libertarian so why not be idealistic?
Of course it's stable. It's the worlds reserve currency, that allows for unlimited fuckery before things break.
It looks like you understand currency about as well as you understand commodities. Go on, tell everyone again how a low lithium price means inflation isn't real.
I never said inflation wasn't real - you fucking liar.
I did say that "inflation" has very little effect on prices compared to supply/demand.
Low commodity prices tell a bigger story than some simplistic moron yelling out HAPERINFLATION!
turd lies. turd lies when he knows he’s lying. turd lies when we know he’s lying. turd lies when he knows that we know he’s lying.
turd lies. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit and a pederast besides.
Completely false and you are a lying shit weasel. First off, how's about we start including the M3 money supply in those calculations? Have you looked at commodity prices lately? How much more is a bag of Halloween candy or 12 pack of soda relative to three years ago? Not to mention the endless subsidies skewing the market further. Why are interest rates so high? What does "increasing" interest rates mean? You and others who are partaking in this gaslighting are pure evil.
That's an insult...
...to actual weasels.
He's either an attention whore or a paid troll. A complete dumb dumb either way.
He's probably both. Pluggo is a lying sack of shit (no insult meant to actual sacks of shit) who posted hardcore CP here a few years ago and got his original handle, "Sarah Palin's Buttplug" banned while Reason sanitized the thread.
How much more is a bag of Halloween candy or 12 pack of soda relative to three years ago?
Those are commodities?
Okay, you're too stupid to debate. Go back to Bratfart.com where you belong.
Yes, dumbass, those are commodities. They get consumed.
Sugar is a commodity. I was providing a "real world" example, trying to keep the bar low, but you still whiffed it.
Sugar is a commodity. Haloween candy and soda are not, idiot.
Moron, Halloween candy and pop use sugar; hence, their price is tied to that commodity.
How retarded are you, asshole?
Frozen Concentrated Orange Juice
Pork bellies!
I sincerely doubt Pluggo’s even seen Trading Places. He deserves the Beeks treatment at the end of the movie.
Jamie Lee Curtis had superb tits back in the day, but she was already too old for turd even back when that movie was made.
Pegging to the US dollar is a faustian bargain. You get a stable dollar, but only in comparison to your own country's perturbations. You are basically consigning your country to selling its labor and resources on the cheap to American companies- who get those dollars earlier in the inflation cycle.
Yes.
The GDP of the second-largest South American economy declined by 4.9% in the second quarter of 2023 compared to the same period last year. Argentina’s economy has been stagnant for many years, and only saw growth in 2013, 2015 and 2017. In other years, the economy actually contracted. During President Alberto Fernández’s first year in office (which coincided with the start of the pandemic), GDP dropped by 9.9%. In 2021, GDP rebounded briefly and then began to sink again. According to an IMF report, the country’s $22,000 per capita GDP in 2022 is 9% lower than it was a decade ago.
.
The monthly Consumer Price Index (CPI) provides the country with information about inflation and the erosion of their purchasing power. In October, the inflation rate rose by 8.3% over September and reached a record 142.7%, the highest rate in 30 years. In South America, only Venezuela has a higher inflation rate than Argentina. In 2015, when Mauricio Macri became president, inflation stood at 25%. By the time he left office four years later, it had doubled to 54%. Today, the inflation rate has nearly tripled, and unofficial forecasts indicate it will spike to 185% by the end of the year.
https://english.elpais.com/international/2023-11-18/the-daunting-economic-landscape-choking-argentine-voters.html
So what do they do now?
Other than blame Joe Biden?
turd, the TDS-addled ass-clown of the commentariat, lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit.
Its still better than what they're going through right now - where his rival candidate, the economics minister, was printing money left-and-right in order to buy the election.
"Brrrrrrrrrrrrrr..." ---Printer
turd, the ass-clown of the commentariat, lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit.
The future is not electric.
https://www.spiked-online.com/2023/11/20/why-the-public-isnt-buying-electric-cars/
Cars will never be popular, we are still selling buggy whips!
/somebody, I’m sure, back in 1920
Electric vehicles were tried at that time and consistently found wanting.
Fun fact: The first EV predates The Pony Express by a couple of decades.
Not enough places to recharge it.
That might be a convincing retort, if it addressed the actual point being made. Specifically, EVs fail to deliver on key measures that people value.
If the government were talking about banning horses and buggies when there were few if any gas stations and automobiles couldn't go a dozen miles between fuelings, people would rightly be dismissive.
The sale of Buggy Whips will be banned by 1835.
They still are selling buggy whips, just for the BDSM market.
🙂
😉
Also for public elementary school teachers and one Oregon office-seeker.
How are we supposed to buy an electric car - charged at home - when we're supposed to be reducing our home electricity usage.
Charging a car overnight could equal your AC bill *in places where solar isn't viable*!
Further, there is nowhere close to the electric generation capacity such a conversion would require and not nearly the time to construct such, even if we knew how to do so.
The entire 'all electric by20XX' is political grandstanding.
^ This can't be repeated enough.
Politicians are banning the most ubiquitous type of vehicle on the planet in favor of electric cars, but they are actively destroying electric generative capacity in the United States.
Expanding by orders of magnitude the amount of electricity demand while actively gutting the supply has but one predictable result.
Either the people pushing this are abjectly retarded, or this is an intentional skyrocketing of electric prices which will ensure people can't cool or heat their homes, use the internet or computers generally, or even travel.
People should be incredibly concerned about this trend, but apparently there are enough people that think the outlet in their home is actually magic.
What the politicians don't seem to realize is that they are going to be the one's left holding the bag when the first world unravels, and there will be people hanging from lamp posts when the public realize what was done to them.
Anyone not saying we need to start building tons of nuclear right now cannot be taken seriously on this at all.
Yes, and they should have started ten or fifteen years ago if this was actually a serious plan. The fact they didn't, and have actually reduced energy supply since then, tells you they either aren't serious or have nefarious aims. I suppose 'both' is an option too, but somehow I don't think 'malice' and 'incompetence' overlap on this one.
We will have plenty of energy to go around here in the US once we remove the democrat Marxist portion of the population
Also, how the hell would we deliver the power? We don't have the delivery infrastructure; nowhere close.
And cries of ‘how often do you drive to Aberdeen?’ don’t hold water, because the freedom cars bring is absolutely intrinsic to their appeal.
Also, if you wanted to finish the drive back from Aberdeen to London, a $7 plastic jerrycan that fits in the trunk/boot with room to spare, (or several if you want to go back to Aberdeen and then back to London again) solves the issue.
If you need that space to store the gas cans, what are you going to do with the bear?
Delicious irony.
https://www.zerohedge.com/political/california-democratic-convention-shut-down-ceasefire-demonstrators
Deja vu all over again?
I always enjoy Democrats eating their own.
I wonder what happened?
How many Democrats turned against FDR regarding his response to the attack on Pearl Harbor?
He says only countries that actively “fight against socialism” should be allies.
Going it alone then.
Stop acting like liber land doesn't exist
No, Oracle of Dogdick, Georgia, the economy sucks.
https://www.zerohedge.com/personal-finance/yes-americans-are-struggling-financially-just-ask-these-folks
Can't wait to hear Fatass Donnie's plan to stave off worldwide inflation.
Wait! - he has no fucking clue about that subject. In fact, the GOP House can't muster one up either - even a fake one like the "Inflation Reduction Act" that did nothing to address the issue.
American voters liked their $1400/per person welfare checks from Donnie - that is for sure.
American voters liked their $1400/per person welfare checks from Donnie – that is for sure.
You mean the Democratic Congress (House and Senate).
The Senate in 2019-2020 was Republican you imbecile.
turd, the ass-clown of the commentariat, lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a TDS-addled lying pile of lefty shit
turd lies when he knows he’s lying. turd lies when we know he’s lying. turd lies when he knows that we know he’s lying.
turd lies. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit and a pederast besides.
Fatass Donnie's economic plan is MORE DEBT. After all he is the self-proclaimed King of Debt.
How does more debt impact inflation?
And I know - Senile Joe has no plan either. They both suck.
turd lies when he knows he’s lying. turd lies when we know he’s lying. turd lies when he knows that we know he’s lying.
turd lies. turd is a TDS-addled lying pile of lefty shit and a pederast besides.
I like how you still pretend Covid was Trump's idea. Shows how much you are flailing and how desperate you are to protect democrats.
"Transhausen By Proxy"
https://www.zerohedge.com/political/tranhausen-proxy-parents-personality-disorders-driving-surge-trans-kids-psychiatrists
I always figured that the trans movement among kids was more for the parents to enhance their Progressive cred.
For young children I can't imagine it's anything else outside of the very rare case of legitimate gender dysphoria among children. For teenage girls social contagion seems like the most plausible answer.
Not entirely true, the parents of the "tranny" tlc show made millions of dollars by ruining their sons life
“Transhausen By Proxy”
I'm keeping that.
The increase in cases of gender dysphoria and families with multiple transgender children have led some medical and mental health professionals to suspect psychological illness, such as narcissistic personality disorder, is involved.
Yes, this is far more likely than anything else I've seen on the subject.
Another possible factor, that I haven't even seen mentioned credibly, is some kind of new environmental factor. I've seen a few 'studies' that tried to draw some conclusions on possible environmental factors, but so far the psychological needs of the parents seem to be the most likely cause of what is apparently an explosion of mental illness regarding gender specifically.
It's the gay frogs. Dr. Alex Jones told me so.
Back in the early 1990's, what some today call nonbinary were simply called weird.
Androgynous
Yeah. In the 90s when I was in high school I hung around with a lot of punks and weirdos and art-fags. That's exactly the kind of people I see adopting these labels now.
the 1980s has been rewritten because its truths dispel today's notions of racism, androgyny and capitalism.
Remember "It's Pat" on SNL?
I doubt the children of all the celebutards are really trannies. More likely their parents are using them to virtue signal and prop up their careers.
Kind of like the arranged marriages of stars back in the Studio System days.
With added child abuse!
Beard by proxy.
1. Who TF wants to eat 'milk bar' anything, let alone a pie?
2. Who TF thinks 'crack pie' is too insensitive but 'milk bar' - the bar known for serving milk laced with drugs and the favorite hangout of droogs to get high before going out to assualt, rape, and murder?
I guess it depends on what sort of crack you’re eating. And how well you do it.
And who’s.
Hunters lawyers threatened them with false advertising.
It’s a great companion to a milk steak.
"In short: Altman was removed via board coup, which the unique governance structure of OpenAI allows, with no reasoning stated. Now there's a mutiny by employees who have lost all faith in the board, and Microsoft is masticating the delicious pieces."
Almost like it was orchestrated by a Machiavellian master manipulator with super-human theory-of-self . . .
Derek Chauvin: still a murderer
https://thehill.com/homenews/4318639-supreme-court-declines-review-derek-chauvins-george-floyd-murder-conviction/
Are you sure? Maybe that guy was trespassing.
And, according to Jeffy, it's OK to shoot to kill trespassers.
Just tell Jeffy that Floyd had a MAGA hat.
Is that a picture of Gillespie when he doesn't comb his hair?
It's his long lost Castilian-speaking clone.
In this case, I think the young'ins are right.
Young voters blame social media for divisions in US: Survey
https://thehill.com/policy/technology/4318552-young-voters-blame-social-media-divisions-poll/
So of course, the US was a place of peace and harmony prior to the invention of social media, whether it be in the 1860s or 1960s.
Remember when Twitter and Facebook used to append a notice anyone someone posted about COVID or the 2020 election.
Imagine if such social media platforms existed back then.
- 1850's: slaves receive free food, housing, and medical care. For more information about slavery, click here...
- 1960's: the North Vietnamese are Communists and allies of the Soviet Union, and they started the war in Vietnam. For the truth, click here...
What do young people know about anything?
Not themselves, of course. Those people who aren't listening to the same Tiktokers they are and thus have horrible, uneducated, opinions on everything.
Figuring out who to blame is the most important thing when Everything Is So Terrible And Unfair.
"As recently as April 2020, "$1 bought 80 pesos," reports The New York Times. "This week, $1 bought nearly 1,000 pesos.""
When I lived there, which was admittedly a while back, $1 US bought $1 ARG.
Good idea
6 in 10 hoping to avoid politics at Thanksgiving: Survey
https://thehill.com/blogs/in-the-know/4318496-avoid-politics-thanksgiving-survey-2024/
Be careful when traveling this week
20M at risk of severe storms, possible tornadoes ahead of Thanksgiving
https://thehill.com/policy/energy-environment/4318651-severe-storms-possible-tornadoes-texas-louisiana/
Colorado court found that Trump is an insurrectionist.
https://thehill.com/opinion/judiciary/4318515-a-colorado-court-makes-it-official-trump-is-an-insurrectionist/
Personally I don't think that is an apt description of him. "Irresponsible and reckless narcissist" seems to do the trick.
So you pick an article that is written by two very left Democrats with massive TDS. Let's look at the actual makeup of the Colorado Supreme Court, shall we?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colorado_Supreme_Court
Oh, look, it's all Democrats. So calling Trump an insurrectionist, even through they had no valid reason to keep him off the ballot is more or less just slander in a legal document.
And doing so without a judicial process that does not include findings or adversarial review. It is the lefts new playbook as seen in the various NY cases. Decide all the facts before trial without any questions or reliance on experts.
Letting the democrat party continue to exist is no longer a viable option.
Factio Democratica delenda est.
Yet Biden still ran for President.
Here is Jack Marshall.
https://ethicsalarms.com/2023/11/20/more-capitol-riot-roshomon/
"Sometimes it is possible to snatch victory from the jaws of defeat in the world of law and politics. Friday’s Colorado court decision refusing to apply the 14th Amendment to disqualify former President Donald Trump from appearing on the Republican presidential primary ballot in Colorado is just such a moment. "
Ah, so this is just an article that is trying to cope with the fact they weren't able to get what they want. How droll.
But Lying Jeffy isn’t a lefty for peddling it.
Look at you, trashing me and trolling me in almost every comment, while you refuse to comment on issues of substance.
Why is that, R Mac?
He does. He’s just not letting you endlessly sea lion him. Like the rest of us, R Mac is tired of your shit.
You posted three straight posts without me responding, so that’s a lie. I also comment on issues of substance, so another lie.
Two lies in one small post. Impressive.
You posted three straight posts without me responding, so that’s a lie.
When I wrote
Look at you, trashing me and trolling me in almost every comment
I'm referring to YOUR comments, not mine. You should have been able to figure that out from the context, especially since I made a big deal of pointing out that 90% of your posts involved me. So I am not surprised you deliberately misinterpreted my comment so as to generate a figleaf excuse to call me a liar, because you are a troll.
So I would appreciate an apology for your false accusation here.
Uh-oh, Best Korea is up to some missile-launching again.
https://thehill.com/policy/defense/4318507-north-korea-south-korea-warned-launch-spy-satellite/
You think North Korea is "best" Korea?
https://knowyourmeme.com/memes/best-korea
Interesting.
But still - Biden is better than Trump, right? Right?
Because Biden isn't a 'dictator'. No. Not all all. He just *tells people what to do*. Totally different.
GM pulls its self-driving auto fleet, Cruise CEO resigns. Not looking good for self-driving cars.
https://thehill.com/business/4318429-gm-cruise-self-driving-cars-ceo-kyle-vogt-resigns/
They, like you, are not ready for real life.
Well, this should make the Trump supporters around here happy.
https://thehill.com/homenews/race-politics/4315607-2024-parties-should-prioritize-black-men/
“Black men are suffering from higher unemployment rates; Black men are struggling to figure out how to feed their families; they are figuring out how to show up and be supportive of their community,” Clanton told The Hill.
But the Democratic Party is not speaking to these issues.
Instead, Democrats’ focus recently has been on issues such as abortion and LGBTQ rights, said Darryn Harris, former chief of staff to former Rep. Karen Bass (D-Calif.) and a candidate for California state Senate.
Black men are more critical of the Democratic Party, Harris said, in part because of the promises they make but fail to keep.
It’s not just Trump, it’s across the board. (As an aside, blockquote is acting up again.)
Black men had historically low levels of unemployment under Trump.
Uh-oh. Fighting at another hospital in Gaza.
https://thehill.com/policy/international/4318345-heavy-fighting-reported-around-another-gaza-hospital/
Wonder how many tunnels they will find under this one.
Not too surprising. Hamas and their ilk have made it quite clear over the years that they have no qualms with using Palestinian civilians as human shields.
Bill Clinton on Israel & Hamas
"Hamas is really smart. When they decide to rocket Israel, they insinuate themselves in the hospitals, in the schools, in the highly populous areas."
And here we go, now we see where ML gets the line that Moms for Liberty is just going after "porn" in schools.
https://www.msnbc.com/the-reidout/reidout-blog/moms-for-liberty-atlanta-town-hall-election-rcna125415
As I demonstrated yesterday, they are going after much more than "porn", they are going after all sorts of books that they deem to be inappropriate by whatever standards that they dream up. But, they keep using "porn" as the justification for their actions. It is their motte-and-bailey tactic.
Motte: "Oh we are just going after porn."
Bailey: "Actually, we are going after all sorts of books that we don't like, and the public-facing rationale that we will give is that they are all just full of porn."
The right opposes the whole Secular Humanist perspective on life represented by modern literature.
As one, I know that humans are in control of our own destiny. They want us to bow to some long-dead Middle Eastern "prophet" or saviour.
It is really that simple.
You constantly lie. It's what you do. You are a pathological liar, and often can't remember the lies you told just minutes ago. You also appear to be ignorant of the fact that everyone is aware of your constant lying. He's also correct in claiming that if there's something in your posts which is not a lie, it's purely accidental.
Do you ever post anything factual? Please cite an example of "modern" literature. Extra credit if you can justify morality in a Secular Humanist framework. The fact that you can post this nonsense without being put in jail is a direct result of people who believed in God. You are such a stupid dink.
Modern literature began in the 19th century with the Realism movement - which rejected supernatural themes.
any Thomas Hardy for example.
I will crush you like a bug on any topic, by the way.
>>crush you like a bug on any topic
1998 called. asked if you really have nothing better to do with your life.
I will crush you like a bug on any topic, by the way.
Only when posting child porn to Reason there, Pluggo. That's the only thing you got us beat on.
You would need to answer my question first. One citation from Wikipedia is not a movement. And don't demand that I defend my position first, although I can easily show substantial Christian influence throughout that period, in literature and more importantly, government and science. You always make these bald assertions that turn out to be total junk. Most importantly, please show me how a framework of Secular Humanism can result in moral law. Short answer is it cannot. Your Secular Humanism is neomarxist junk science, which means it's the same prepackaged garbage used to justify all manner of atrocities.
turd lies. turd lies when he knows he’s lying. turd lies when we know he’s lying. turd lies when he knows that we know he’s lying.
turd lies. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit and a pederast besides.
And occasionally, he outdoes himself:
"I will crush you like a bug on any topic, by the way."
Stupid sumbitch has proven himself to a complete ignoramus in nearly any topic he's ever breached.
Fuck off and die, you pathetic excuse for humanity.
Ronald McFondled, you such a clown.
Do you ever post anything factual?
In Pluggo's case, the short answer is "no".
I would rather see him executed for raping children.
Also, you were banned for posting links to child pornography. Go die in a fire.
Stay away from our kids you pervert.
Pluggo needs a good doxxing. Then he can focus on how to deal with everyone around when they find out he loves child pornography and rapes children.
I would be surprised to learn that the people who interact with him in person haven't figured him out.
He could already be on a sex offender registry for all I know. It wouldn’t surprise me. I’ll bet he and Jeffy are both NAMBLA members too.
1. Your article says nothing about books one way or the other.
2. None of these books are banned. Not including them in a curriculum or elementary school library does not make them banned.
3. Jeffy, do you believe 8 year olds should have access to Penthouse Letters in addition to This Book is Gay and Gender Queer?
Apparently he does believe so. I think Jeffy needs to be on a watch list.
3. Jeffy, do you believe 8 year olds should have access to Penthouse Letters in addition to This Book is Gay and Gender Queer?
somehow they never have a good answer here
Whose 8-year-olds? If it were my 8-year-olds, I would not want them to have access to Penthouse Letters, no. I think other parents can make reasonable decisions for their children.
Do you think there is one single universal standard by which to judge what all 8-year-olds "should" and "should not" have access to?
I imagine you could probably find some set of parents out there who do think that it's okay if their 8-year-olds read Penthouse Letters. What, if anything, do you think should happen to these parents?
Then should those same kids have access to This Book is Gay with depictions of fellatio by minors, and Gender Queer with depictions of cunnilingus and erect penises?
^speaking of baileys
No, there shouldn't be a standard imposed on everyone. Parents should be the ones to decide. If they want their kids to read those books, they can give them to them.
I thought we were talking about books in schools, where every child would have access, regardless of their parent’s wishes?
Pretty dishonest change of subject, Lying Jeffy.
I answered the question *as written*. Why are you objecting to that?
It was a response to your post about schools Lying Jeffy.
What, if anything, do you think should happen to these parents?
In my state, that would violate a law called "pandering material harmful to juveniles". Parents are not exempt, but are rarely prosecuted. I would support lenient sentencing for first offenses. Very, very few parents are perverts like you who would do such a thing, so cases very rarely come to the attention of law enforcement. In those very rare cases, it's usually in the context of custody disputes.
Teachers and librarians, by the way, ARE explicitly exempt from the law, unlike parents.
Hey Vernon, are you going to apologize for lying about me yesterday, per this discussion?
https://reason.com/2023/11/19/will-russia-ever-be-free/?comments=true#comment-10325050
Where do you draw the line, Jeffy?
Don’t be a coward. You lied when you claimed I supported an “unlimited” right for parents to consent on their childrens’ behalf. THIS IS A LIE. Just admit your lie.
So, where is the limit?
I don't need to specify a limit to show that you lied. In that very same discussion, the one where you claimed I supported "unlimited" right of parents to consent on their children's behalf, I also said that there is a limit to the consent that parents may give. Do you deny that I said that? Do I need to quote it again?
What is the limit, Jeffy?
Coward.
Seems like Lying Jeffy can’t identify where the limit is, but wants to claim Vernon is lying when he said he has no limit.
R Mac, are you aware of the backstory behind this little feud? Or are you just going to jump in and call me a liar without knowing all of the facts?
You understand these 2 degenerates literally support child porn and pedofilia? Sbp literally posted links to child porn
Very much so. We go after Pluggo and Jeffy not for our sake, not for the sake of those who we agree with, but for the sake of the newbies and the lurkers. Those who may not know of these two; those who may be unaware.
Oh, so you poison the well about me because you cannot refute the ideas that I present honestly.
You present ideas honestly? Don't make me laugh too hard, twerp. We refute them all the time, day in and day out. Just because you're highly verbose does not make your arguments any truer or correct. They're still atrocious, dreadful, awful, terrible, erroneous, faulty, wrong, and just plain stupid and asinine.
You and your pals lie, troll, bait, insult, and commit numerous fallacies. You don't refute squat.
If you could refute my ideas without lying, you would. But you can't, so you have to resort to spewing crap instead.
You would have to spell out your ideas first for anyone to "refute [your] ideas without lying." I see you routinely pick some minutiae and argue that point, while refusing to address the main part. (see the conversation above with Vernon, R Mac, and others about "porn" in schools.)
You've gotten pretty good at sealioning, similar to Mike Laurson when he was still on this site.
I do note that you don't seem to hold my critics to the same standard. What are they doing, if not picking at minutiae and using that to troll me with?
But you do have half a point. I do spend way too much time arguing with the assholes around here who will never be honest nor fair with me no matter how much I bend over backwards for them. So that will have to stop. Thanks for helping me realize this.
“…no matter how much I bend over backwards for them.”
Lol. Oh lord, Jeff as the battered wife. It had to come to this.
Except you started this thread talking about books in schools, then switch to individual parents making decisions for their own children.
That’s not honesty.
ITC's question:
3. Jeffy, do you believe 8 year olds should have access to Penthouse Letters in addition to This Book is Gay and Gender Queer?
Troll Mac, why do you accuse me of dishonesty when I explicitly answered ITC's question *as written*? He didn't write about 8-year-olds having access *in schools*. He wrote about 8-year-olds having access, period.
Why do you falsely accuse me of being dishonest? Isn't that itself a type of dishonesty?
His question was in response to your post about…porn in schools.
I see. So even though ITC didn't specifically ask about porn *in schools*, I should have assumed that is what he meant when he asked his question, and according to you I am dishonest because I did not try to assume his intent. Is that what you are saying?
So, this is totally different from those other times, when I did try to assume an author's intent via context, and you accused me of being dishonest by not taking the author's words literally. Right?
Maybe, instead, your opinion on what I should or shouldn't have done is completely worthless because you are just here to troll. Isn't that right?
I also note that as of this moment, you've made 10 comments on this page, and 9 of them have involved me in some way, either responding to me or mentioning me.
Why do fully 90% of your comments relate to me in some way? Is it because you are trolling and baiting me? Isn't this because that is the only real reason why you come here?
I was busy today so I couldn’t spend much time commenting.
How much time did you spend scrolling through counting my posts, lol?
That's even worse for you. So in the very scarce time you had to comment today, you chose to devote 90% of your comments to me? Is it any wonder that I regard you as nothing more than a troll?
October Was A Record Month For U.S. Oil Production
https://www.forbes.com/sites/rrapier/2023/11/08/october-was-a-record-month-for-us-oil-production/?sh=3c30a5933677
Does not align with current wingnut narrative.....
turd, the ass-clown of the commentariat, lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit.
$5.00 a gallon gas does not align with neocon Bushpig narratives.
Who signed the leases shrike?
If he answered that, he'd have to drop his TDS.
Private owners. The vast majority of production is on private property.
Was that after they shut it all down and used up our reserves?
Define where. Actual geographic locations.
Oh my God. He learned.
Yet you give Joe credit constantly, why? Has energy under Joe where he had an effect hone up or down? What about permits for pipelines and refineries?
Which billionaire you love has been buying up land for purchase of energy production while trying to limit production on public lands?
a "far-right outsider" (CNN), a "Trump-like libertarian" (The Washington Post)
If you're an ACTUAL Libertarian, these descriptions would be apt in today's political climate.
>>(Sometimes democracy means accepting outcomes you dislike!)
this would be entirely necessary if a couple of you would mention the travesty of justice surrounding j6 as well. otherwise it's sarc (the poster not the noun!)
Consistently candid: On Friday at noon, OpenAI's board asked CEO Sam Altman to join a meeting. The board of the massively valued company, which makes ChatGPT, fired Altman on the spot. Greg Brockman, OpenAI's president and one of Altman's cofounders, had not been invited to the meeting; he was fired from the board and subsequently resigned from the company.
OpenAI's board asked ChatGPT to write a one-page termination letter for their founder, Sam Altman. The results were surprising.
Chief technology officer Mira Murati was appointed interim CEO,
The board asked ChatGPT why Sam Altman's role should be gender swapped. The results were surprising.
Dayum, turns out ChatGPT does progressive-speak perfectly and that's coming from someone who has an undergrad degree in writing exactly this kind of bullshit.
Yikes, glad I never held a single job that relied on my actual degree. Turns out any PR flack can be replaced right now today!
>>Altman "was not consistently candid in his communications with the board, hindering its ability to exercise its responsibilities" and that "the board no longer has confidence in his ability to continue leading OpenAI."
need to know which side wants Cylons.
The board agreed to disagree on Sam Altman's continued employment.
the chatgpt above is clever is that you or chatgpt for real?
ChatGPT fo' real, yo.
There's a Scott Adams cartoon where an employee is begging Dogbert for a verbose termination memo because a terse memo connotes incompetence (and Dogbert sends out a memo "Re: Fred He's fired.") that seems very apropos.
>>Several top developers resigned immediately in the wake of the Altman news:
I'm so important.
Creating A.I. sans Sam
is worse than Hamas.
>>The triumph of neoliberal trade policy, Hanukkah edition.
I once hit a glass menorah/hukkah it was intricate.
That seems more appropriate for Kwaanza.
In 2008, famed New York City pastry chef Christina Tosi opened up Milk Bar with seed money provided by Momofuku boss David Chang. Now, in 2023, they’ve finally realized the error in their pie-naming ways:
What was wrong with Crack Pie, what does “privilege" have to do with it? And “Momofuku” doesn’t raise any eyebrows in the world of corporate “naming”?
It is in no way racist to suggest that only black people use crack. Nevermind that the white-as-driven-snow Presidents own son is (or was) a user.
Wait, seriously, is that what this is about? "Crack" is presupposed to be about black people, by the people that were calling the name "problematic"? Are you serious?
JFC, why don't progressives just come out and say, "We don't like it when you talk bad about niggers!"?
Fuck this company. They apologized. We're done here.
I can only assume that's the case, since there is no other possible reading of that sign as far as I can discern.
Since progressives are the same group that gave us eugenics and sterilization of American women, the answer to the 'are they racist and sexist' question is 'yes'.
I can't imagine what else they are talking about with "insensitive". Which is just crazy. People have been comparing irresistibly delicious food items to crack for decades now.
who could resist Tosi wanting to call her dessert crack pie?
It could be as addictive as...
Oh, wait a minute.
through a Revenge of the Nerds lens the idea is hilarious.
I know.
How is it "privileged" to know enough about any kind of cocaine--powder or crack--to be able to call something "Crack Pie?". And who would want to eat something with that name???
Hard pass!
What was wrong with Crack Pie, what does “privilege” have to do with it?
"Douchebag New Yorkers assuming they're privileged enough to put rolled oats into a desert and call it Crack." is the narrative I'm going with.
>>Milei has been described as a "populist" ... a "far-right outsider" ... a "Trump-like libertarian" ... a "victory for [the] far right" ... "Wolverine"
not one Hand of God reference?
How "libertarian" is Milei's plan to outlaw abortion?
Argentinian babies everywhere will learn to dance the Chacarera and Candombe in salute to Milei.
Well, we can slice that two different ways as we have two beings involved here. Most of the arguments seem to be for the mother, but tend to forget that there’s also a developing human in the womb who also has rights, including a right to life, does it not? This would be an easier question, were we monotremes who lay eggs, or marsupials who give birth to little joeys that use an external pouch, but we’re not. We’re placental mammals who have live birth at term. Thus, we have a couple of different issues:
1. Whose rights trump whose here? The mother or the developing human?
2. When should the cutoff point be, if abortion is to be allowed? 6 weeks, 12-15 weeks, 22 weeks, or 9 months as far too many Democrats seem to want? Do we cut it off at brain activity, heartbeat, some other point?
who also has rights, including a right to life, does it not?
A right to seize its mother's body to sustain itself? No.
The mother fucking put it there. The baby didn't "seize" anything.
Everyone knows what sex is actually for.
She could have taken it up the bum, played with toys, stuck to oral, but no.
And even if she absolutely had to stick a dick in there, there are still condoms, dams, the pill and a dozen other ways to stop from getting pregnant.
But she didn't. She rawdogged a dick and did what 250 million years of evolution dictated would create a brand new human.
And you pretend the baby "seized' her womb.
Fuck off.
If she chooses not to be pregnant, and is forced to continue the pregnancy against her will, then her body has been seized for the benefit of the fetus. But as I said, you will be unable to see that, because the woman becomes invisible to you once she becomes pregnant. Or, in your case, once she has had sex.
If only abortion were a slam-dunk libertarian issue, this question would be easy to answer.
I recently saw a poll-question that was asked of men and women:
If you could get 80% of everything you wanted from a partner, would that be a good match.
Men: Overwhelmingly said "yes"
Women: Overwhelmingly said "no" as it would be 'settling'.
Libertarians: The chicks of political discourse.
No surprise from the sex that routinely says 'I can fix him' and seem to actually think they can. Most men are happy to find someone that can put up with our shit for longer than a year. No clue how my wife's done it for 15 years.
Maybe she got 81% of everything she wanted.
To be fair, "80% of everything men wanted from a partner" would be a chick willing to get to third base with other chicks.
double-up on a dude like me one of the better delivered phrases ever.
I'd say it depends on which 80%. Some things are not to be compromised.
Does this mean men just have a more realistic view of things? Or are just resigned to women being baffling? Almost everyone settles for something less than their ideal.
Ask the women, "If you could get 80% of everything you wanted from a cat, would that be a good match? I think you could even get that down to 20-30%.
You could get it down to 0%. Cats are just safer substitutes for a narcissistic, abusive husband.
What does women refusing to take responsibility for their own actions have to do with libertarianism?
That's sarcasm, right? I have trouble telling.
There are legitimate and difficult to resolve differences on the abortion issue among libertarians.
The fetophiles are so obsessed with the "rights" of the fetus that they don't even perceive the woman, so they're incapable of seeing a pro-choice position as legitimate.
It would be very unlibertarian to allow the rights of babies to be infringed. By murdering them.
I feel like a lot of people talk about Capitalism the way previous generations used to talk about The Devil
To be clear: I do talk about Progressivism the way previous generations talk about The Devil, Evil, Chaos, and The Primordial Annihilator, etc. because it’s accurate.
–
The DevilProgressivism makes work for idle hands.– The greatest trick
The DevilProgressivism ever pulled is convincing the world he didn’t exist.– The second greatest trick
The DevilProgressivism ever pulled is convincing the world that he’s the good guy.– Faust: “Who are you then?”
MephistophelesProgressive: “I am part of that power which eternally wills evil and eternally works good.”–
The DevilProgressivism pulls the strings which make us dance;We find delight in the most loathsome things;
Some furtherance of Hell each new day brings,
And yet we feel no horror in that rank advance.
“Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end for they do so with the approval of their own conscience. They may be more likely to go to Heaven yet at the same time likelier to make a Hell of earth. This very kindness stings with intolerable insult. To be "cured" against one's will and cured of states which we may not regard as disease is to be put on a level of those who have not yet reached the age of reason or those who never will; to be classed with infants, imbeciles, and domestic animals.”
C.S. Lewis had it right.
I like how colonialism can only result in inflammation or capitalism. Amazing
The only initiating node is ‘Colonialism’, the only terminating node is ‘trauma’. Supremacism, in no way, leads to actual supremacy, it’s not even on the chart. White, human, and male are all inherent to supremacy, apparently. “Undoing this at every level” would, seemingly, include undoing human supremacy.
It’s like an expanded, retarded flow chart version of the underpants gnome meme:
Step 1. Colonialism
Step 2. ?
Step 3. Trauma
And, supposedly, these people have M.D./Ph.D.s.
If it wasn't for white men, Earth would be a peaceful utopia. Surely.
The woman who drew up that chart teaches internal medicine in San Fransisco.
Perhaps decolonizing means something different to her.
Javier Milei’s video yelling “afuera” or “afweda” and ripping agency names off that board is
solid.
gold.
Is that like "Covfefe" is Spanish?
🙂
😉
No, "outside".
Or in this case probably best translated as "gone" or "out the door".
I like Ms Wolf, but I think her closeness with openAI (Her SO works there), is leading her to be coy about what is actually going on.
It is no secret that MSFT masterfully co-opted OpenAI to be its own little R&D accelerator for AI. Many, many Silicon Valley leaders were extremely angry that MSFT was essentially benefiting from a company that was supposed to be a consortium of "ethical non profit AI development."
What we are likely seeing here is a clumsy attempt by those investors to wrest control of OpenAI from Microsoft. It is backfiring. But that doesn't mean they were not wrong about their concerns. It is noteworthy that Altman had a job at Microsoft within hours of being fired from OpenAI. Very obviously the Board was concerned that Altman was feeding everything to Microsoft, and this seems to be pretty clear confirmation of that suspicion.
Are you suggesting that Liz is a wolfe in sheep’s clothing?
Oh, good. Because I was developing a Seinfeld-esque “Take an overview“/”It’s a game of world domination being played by two men who can’t run their own
livescompanies.” impression.Ukraine is, in fact, weak.
Ukraine not weak! (Upends game board violently)
In international circles, it is referred to as country 404.
Here's a sampling of stupid millennial and zoomer women.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12766887/Millennials-Gen-Z-women-convert-ISLAM-Israel-Hamas.html
A dope who goes by the name 'leftist queer gremlin' is converting to Islam.
do you have to like deconvert from leftist queer gremlin first or is it just a step through the door here's your quran type thing?
They deserve their new religion.
Needless to say, none of those people in the list are actually going to any Mosque's to, you know, actually interact with any other Muslims.
One of them seems to have created their own little Mosque, and god only knows what that nut is actually 'teaching' given that they literally just decided to become Muslim a few weeks ago.
I suspect that some of those TikTok retards are doing it purely for another avenue of graft from their 'followers'.
If they aren't thrown off a roof their views on sexuality, they'll find themselves at the business end of a fatwa. Of course, a clever terrorist cell could probably find a use for them as a walking bomb too.
Maybe Artie found a new home?
I suppose gremlin knows it is also converting to road pizza.
Leftist, always out-stupiding themselves.
'In turn, Milei has been described as a "populist" (by CNBC and the Associated Press and Politico), a "far-right outsider" (CNN), a "Trump-like libertarian" (The Washington Post), a "victory for [the] far right" (The New York Times), and, more amusingly, "Wolverine" (The Guardian).'
FUCKING ASSHOLES. Except the Guardian. Well, them too.