Americans Don't Much Like Federal Agencies
Yet another year of low ratings for the apparatus of the D.C. leviathan.

This will be a shocker, I know, but with rare exception, Americans don't think very highly of the federal government. When asked their opinions of 16 different prominent federal agencies, members of the public are more likely to voice negative sentiments than positive ones for about three-quarters of them. Can you guess who gets the most hate? (Hint: it has something to do with April 15.)
You are reading The Rattler from J.D. Tuccille and Reason. Get more of J.D.'s commentary on government overreach and threats to everyday liberty.
Years of Low Ratings for Federal Agencies
"Of 16 federal government agencies and departments included in the latest Gallup survey, just four receive positive job-performance ratings from a majority of Americans, making 2023 the third consecutive year of relatively low readings," reports Gallup. "The U.S. Postal Service (62%), the Secret Service (55%), the Department of Defense (53%) and NASA (52%) are each evaluated as 'excellent' or 'good' by more than half of U.S. adults."
As with most matters in modern America, opinions vary based on partisan affiliation.
"Democrats and Democratic-leaning independents view 15 of the 16 agencies and departments more positively than Republicans and Republican-leaning independents do," notes the polling agency. "Only the VA is rated similarly by both party groups. About one in three of each group views the VA positively."
Consolation Prizes
That said, those four agencies getting a thumbs-up represent consolation prizes, at best. The Department of Defense gets 53 percent "excellent" or "good" assessments in this survey, but in separate results released in July, Gallup noted: "At 60%, confidence in the military was last this low in 1997, and it hasn't been lower since 1988, when 58% were confident." That helps fuel a military recruiting crisis—the Army fell short of recruitment goals again, this month. This is a positively rated agency.
Likewise, the Postal Service wins top spot with 62 percent "excellent" or "good" assessments. You have to wonder if that reflects the service's largely successful efforts to put behind it that unpleasant "going postal" period when, as Vice noted, "in the late 80s and early 90s, a spate of shootings by disgruntled postal workers became the primary way most Americans thought of the post office." Way to go, mail carriers; you shifted your public image to stolen mail from blood spatter!
The Secret Service gets a 55 percent positive assessment, though it's difficult to know whether that's despite or because of agents' hard-partying reputation from Cartagena to Amsterdam to D.C. Who doesn't like a good time?
And NASA, with 52 percent approval, continues to capture Americans' high-flying imaginations. Truthfully, though, it has largely become an office that contracts out the actual space work to private companies such as Northrop Grumman and (especially) SpaceX.
Those are the agencies to which Americans are, on average, favorably inclined. What about the others?
"Majorities of Americans rate the other 12 government agencies as 'only fair' or 'poor,'" adds Gallup. "The IRS is viewed in the lowest regard, with 30% positive and 70% negative ratings, while the Veterans Administration (VA), Department of Justice, Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Federal Reserve Board, and Food and Drug Administration (FDA) are not far behind, with 32% to 38% rating them positively."
Fundraiser for the Unpopular
That the IRS is widely despised is hardly news. Its role, after all, is to forcibly extract funds from the population for agencies like the Veterans Administration (66 percent negative), Department of Justice (66 percent negative), Environmental Protection Agency (66 percent negative) and, should you get on the government's bad side, Homeland Security (57 percent negative) and FBI (53 percent negative). An arm-twisting fundraiser for unpopular causes is destined to be unloved.
Beyond that, the IRS sullies its name with incompetence, criminal activity, and politicization. In August, the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration revealed "the IRS cannot account for thousands of microfilm cartridges containing millions of sensitive business and individual tax account record."
Last year, the Government Accountability Office found IRS employees are constantly engaged in "willful unauthorized access of tax data."
This summer, IRS whistleblowers claimed superiors "slow walked" the investigation into Hunter Biden and that "Assistant U.S. Attorney Lesley Wolf told us prosecutors had decided to conceal some evidence from the investigators." That's after the scandal of a decade ago, confirmed by the Inspector General, over targeting of Tea Party groups.
"Since the advent of the federal income tax about a century ago, several presidents – or their zealous underlings – have directed the IRS to use its formidable police powers to harass or punish enemies, political rivals, and administration critics," The Christian Science Monitor reported in 2013.
"A Series of Withering Federal Watchdog Reports"
The FBI has also developed a reputation among conservatives for hostile partisanship. Truthfully, its political interference dates back decades and is less consistently ideological than protective of the powerful.
"The FBI…has placed more emphasis on domestic dissent than on organized crime and, according to some, let its efforts against foreign spies suffer because of the amount of time spent checking up on American protest groups," the U.S. Senate's Church Committee complained in 1976.
The law enforcement agency is a mess. In March of this year, Politico pointed out that "a series of withering federal watchdog reports have faulted the bureau for slipshod compliance with everything from national-security surveillance procedures to its own rules limiting contacts with the media."
Another mess is the universally loathed Veterans Administration. The VA has a history of offering poor care to veterans, gaming waiting lists to conceal the number of patients denied treatment, and retaliating against whistleblowers. Uniting Democrats, Republicans, and Independents in contempt, somewhere in the VA is a lesson on how not to build trust.
With controversial authoritarian policy responses to the pandemic an ongoing matter of public debate, low regard for the Centers for Disease Control & Prevention (58 percent negative) and Food and Drug Administration (61 percent negative) is no surprise. Public health figures are being called out for suppressing discussion of the likely lab-leak origin of COVID-19, and the CDC, in particular, has shed credibility with many Americans.
All things considered, it's a bit surprising that any federal agency enjoys the trust and support of significant segments of the public. Perhaps it's just the triumph of low standards. But as overwhelmingly negative opinions for most agencies of the government attest, the most consistent accomplishment of the U.S. government is in its ability to disappoint the American people.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
"Americans Don't Much Like Federal Agencies"
But they do like them some federal dollars, crony deals, regulatory capture, and emotional support.
"Democrats ... view 15 of the 16 agencies and departments more positively than Republicans."
Definitely favored more-so by a specific party.
They REALLY like them during any crisis. Their word is law!
Of course people still want the services of those agencies, they just want to complain. Nothing new here. My question is could you get all the participates to agree on what to do with an agency? Or is it the case where half thinks the agency does too much and half thinks they do too little?
Agree, concur, duly noted...
Also: It depends on whose ox gets gored! The IRS should tax YOU more and give ME more "earned income rebates"!
Alternative: "Don't tax you, don't tax me, tax the fella behind the tree"!
It seems to be very common among affluent "progressives" to believe that the group that's rich enough to avoid paying their "fair share" starts at an income of around $10-20k/year more than they make themselves.
The exploded cost of living that correlates with areas in which progressive policies are firmly in place may exacerbate this effect. I'd bet that at least half of the people in Nancy Pelosi's district who make $500k/year think of themselves as being particularly wealthy since they can barely afford a 3BR 2BA house with a postage-stamp sized yard and one-car garage (if they're lucky). When the 2017 "tax cut for the rich" was enacted, the focus of most reactions from Marin County (and other areas of "wine country" focused on the SALT deduction limit and how hard it was going to hit those paying $40-50k per year in CA state taxes who would be losing most of that deduction (and increasing their federal tax bill by $9-12k/year); among the leftists who I had any interaction with, it was almost impossible to trigger any recognition that anyone paying $40k in deductible CA state taxes is making $400k/year, or owns multiple $Millions in Real Estate, or is registering a fleet of 35+ vehicles, and one way or another is in the group who they'd been railing for years weren't paying their "fair share". One common retort I encountered is that not everyone living in Marin is that rich, and I had to point out to people in exactly that situation that they're also not the ones paying mid-high five figures in State taxes.
Or there's Non-Nazi fans who think their existence should at least be Constitutional.
The agency and their charters were created by the legislature in what way are they unconstitutional? Have any ever been ruled unconstitutional by SCOTUS? Bogus argument.
Any 1st grader can read the US Constitutions enumerated powers and fully understand most of today’s US government is UN-Constitutional. Liberal SCOTUS justices who don’t even mention the enumerated powers in their rulings (Treasonous CRIMINAL COPS) is no excuse.
Why don't you go ahead a present a case, any case at all, for how you think each federal agency is granted authority for it’s existence by the US Constitution. I'm up for a good laugh.
The courts have expanded the "commerce clause" beyond reason.
I would suggest that that power rest in the "necessary and proper clause" in Article 1, Section 8.
"To make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into Execution the foregoing Powers, and all other Powers vested by this Constitution in the Government of the United States, or in any Department or Officer thereof."
The framers of the Constitution saw that it would be necessary to create structures or agencies to carry out running the government and implementing laws.
I AM Making a Good Salary from Home $6580-$7065/week , which is amazing, under a year ago I was jobless in a horrible economy. I thank God every day I was blessed with these instructions and now it’s my duty to pay it forward and share it with Everyone. go to home media tech tab for more detail reinforce your heart
This Website➤---------------➤ http://WWW.DAILYPRO7.COM
lol... And any 1st grader will tell you the Necessary and Proper clause isn't a power within itself. Hut hum: "the foregoing Powers, and all other Powers vested by this Constitution"
Wanna try again?
You mean self service?
"Or is it the case where half thinks the agency does too much and half thinks they do too little?"
I think this is definitely the case for some of them, like EPA and FDA
Do you really want the "services" of the EPA and FDA? Time for space exploration to stand on its own and dump NASA. Dealing with the USPS is a crapshoot at this point as to whether the letter will get there before or after the contents is moot.
I'd can them all, excepting the DoD and State Department.
I AM Making a Good Salary from Home $6580-$7065/week , which is amazing, under a year ago I was jobless in a horrible economy. I thank God every day I was blessed with these instructions and now it’s my duty to pay it forward and share it with Everyone. go to home media tech tab for more detail reinforce your heart
This Website➤---------------➤ http://WWW.DAILYPRO7.COM
"Do you really want the “services” of the EPA?"
How many environmental complaints does EPA get each year. The agency is likely in Hawaii monitoring the fire clean up. They monitor clean up after any number of disasters each year. That does not even count the routine monitoring of pollutants in air, water and waste. So I would say that plenty of people want the EPA's services.
Remember, the USPS is now a division of the FBI, tasked with spying on us as well.
The Secret Service gets a 55 percent positive assessment
Wow. What's their secret?
The IRS is viewed in the lowest regard, with 30% positive and 70% negative ratings,
That's probably the 30% of Americans that now works for the IRS
Polling shenanigans?
They exist. 0 stars.
Because they know how to party?
https://www.cnn.com/2012/10/19/us/secret-service-prostitution-scandal/index.html
Testifying before Congress in May, Sullivan insisted the incident was an aberration – just poor choices by a dozen agents under the influence of alcohol. “This is not a cultural issue, this is not a systemic issue,” he told the Senate Homeland Security Committee back then, saying that similar misconduct hasn’t occurred on thousands of other overseas trips by Secret Service agents. However, the DHS inspector general’s investigation reportedly reveals that Secret Service agents associated with prostitutes on previous trips to El Salvador, Panama, Romania and China.
Including the 85,000 new recruits.
But the democrats like them, so the money flows.
At least the postal system is Constitutional.
Which can be changed by amendment, and it's high time we did.
So how is it the Nazi-Empire agencies keep getting so many votes when political campaigns actually promise them a Nazi-Empire?? Is the left really so Gang color oriented (my team) they'd rather vote for Hitler than De-Regulation and promises of Liberty and Justice?
There are SO many of them too:
Check out https://www.usa.gov/agency-index for an alphabetical list of the thousands of them....
Every single one a parasite feeding upon the host they will eventually kill from within.
Ron Paul has been warning us for years now...anybody paying attention?
And the number and scope will only continue to grow.
And each one has hundreds, or even thousands of nonessential workers. Yet they never get rid of them.
Considering the boondoggle-after-boondoggle at NASA and their relentless pushing of the anthropocentric global warmings scam along with the USPS's neck-deep participation in the 2020 Presidential election fraud, to say I'm surprised to see them on any 'approval' list is the understatement of the decade.
Not to mention the F-35 boondoggle which is now run up into the hundreds of billions.
And I thought the XB-70 Valkyrie was a boondoggle.
> Americans Don't Much Like Federal Agencies
But yet Americans still keep demanding Federal government solve all their problems. Boaf sides.
Will there be ANY presidential candidate on stage for the 2024 election arguing to reduce the size and scope of the Federal government? Hah! Boaf sides.
Something about cleaning the D.C. swamp?
I think Moderation4ever hit it on the head when he suggested some people dislike an agency because it regulates too much, while others dislike the same agency because it regulates too little.
"while others dislike the same agency because it regulates too little."
This I doubt very much. They wouldn't be disliked. They would be liked and the claim would be that they need more money and power to do more, and do it better.
If they are not in the industry being regulated, then most people want more regulation. Everytime someone says "there oughta be a law!" they really mean they want bureaucrats to be regulating.
Must be a lefty-infested area thing. I've never heard anyone spout such a non-sense phrase. I hear "the government ought to bugger off" or "is dumb as rocks" all the time though.
For generations, people have been taught that government is the answer to everything. In the here and now, people who understand that it is not and should be limited are in a very small minority.
Not so small minority anymore and it's growing thanks to people like Ron Paul.
The spark of liberty will light the fires of freedom in the hearts of men.
On stage? No. Because the Bipartisan Debate Commission made sure of that.
Just remember the motto at every government agency," we're not happy until you're not happy."
Disaffected anti-government cranks are (with gun nuts, religious kooks, and our vestigial right-wing bigots) among my favorite culture war casualties.
Carry on, antisocial misfits.
Pro-Gov-Gun usage against those 'icky' people #1 fanboy.
I'd guess you live on government-gun stolen money of your neighbors.
The reason why the founding fathers set up this government was to protect our rights and liberty, not abuse and rob us, use every weasel word to attack and dismantle the Bill of Rights then jail people for practicing even basic freedom of speech.
So maybe you would feel more at home in Ukraine, N. Korea or even the U.K.
And if you want to see what happens when people who just want to be left alone, have had enough, stick around.
What about the federal agency known as Anthony Fauci?
I hear he's been holding up in der Bundestag .
>> included in the latest Gallup survey
votes speak louder than polls.
Well then they need more power and money to better serve us, amiright?
I AM Making a Good Salary from Home $6580-$7065/week , which is amazing, under a year ago I was jobless in a horrible economy. I thank God every day I was blessed with these instructions and now it’s my duty to pay it forward and share it with Everyone. go to home media tech tab for more detail reinforce your heart
This Website➤---------------➤ http://WWW.DAILYPRO7.COM
I think the very ignorance lies in thinking 'guns' are going to serve us in any positive manner short of ensuring Liberty and Justice for all.
Here’s the explanation: 1) politician promises to reform the unpopular agencies and their missions; 2) politician gets elected or re-elected to office; 3) politician fails to keep promises; 4) clueless voters remain clueless; 5) politician promises to reform the unpopul … etc. etc. etc. in endless loop over decades.
The federal government is the greatest grift of them all.
It’s easy to hate on a federal agency, but as the “Tea Party” proved, you make even a millimeter’s move to take away any of their federal freebies, all hell breaks loose. They want what's "theirs"... they just want the undesirables and minorities to have everything taken away.
Aside from a couple of checks while they locked down what was a functioning economy during the Covid scam the federal government hasn't done jack shit for me. It has done nothing except to steal my labor. I don't know what "freebies" I have purportedly benefited from. Maybe you can enlightened me.
I didn't even get the checks.
You might get a "free visit" from the IRS and some of its storm troopers.
"Since the advent of the federal income tax about a century ago, several presidents – or their zealous underlings – have directed the IRS to use its formidable police powers to harass or punish enemies, political rivals, and administration critics,"
The humane way a "free democracy" handles enemies.
Imagine that. Corrupt people becoming politicians and abusing their power.
The IRS steals from everyone twice a month. Allegedly so the government can stop some random bad guys from stealing from us every now and then.
Or pretend to.
Don't forget the government uses that money for foreign interventionist policies, most of whom are dismal failures if not outright disasters.
I love NOAA, NASA, USGS, NPS.
F*** the FAA
Oh and the AMA( Academy of Model Aeronautics)
Revealed preferences are always much more accurate than survey responses. Americans seem to love federal agencies, because they keep voting for politicians who promise more of them, and never vote for politicians who promise to dissolve some of them.
"I do Solemnly swear to break the people's law over me and ignore the very definition of the USA and build you a treasonous [Na]tional So[zi]alist - Empire." --- And most ?American? citizens cheer...
Thus; The very good reason Constitutional Amendments were setup to be very hard to change though sadly easily violated by electing Al'Capone (lawlessness) to office.
Of course the democrats view government agencies in a positive manner After all the government agencies represent government power and control over the American people which is exactly what democrats crave. They all want an all powerful government to control everything we sat, think and do.Liberals crave that power like a drug addict.
Nothing would please the liberals more than to install a totalitarian dictatorship.