Biden, the 'Most Pro-Union President,' Reaps What He Sows
Labor actions largely respond to policies that cause widespread pain.

Labor unions are having a moment. That moment features wins for the Teamsters against UPS, unionized pilots against airlines, a movie industry strike, and a historic strike against the Big Three carmakers.
This is massive news for the self-described "most pro-union president"—but more for its awkwardness than for the resurgence of organized labor. The strikes are partially motivated by inflation under the Biden administration, auto workers worry about the destruction of jobs threatened by the White House's push for electric vehicles, labor actions threaten the Democratic Party's gains with corporate America, and the president finds himself vying for union support with his populist predecessor.
In other words, it's an appropriately chaotic moment for modern America.
Big Demands in Response to Painful Policies
"UAW President Shawn Fain announced today that the union's strike authorization vote passed with near universal approval from the 150,000 union workers at Ford, General Motors and Stellantis," according to an August 25 United Auto Workers press release. "The union's demands include the elimination of tiered wages and benefits, wage increases to offset inflation and match the generous salary increases of company executives over the last four years."
The UAW's concern with, in part, wages eroded by the declining value of the dollar echoes that of other unions that complain of losing ground under high inflation. That's inconvenient for a president who touts his pro-labor credentials but who also presided over that period of pinched budgets and is blamed for the situation by the majority of Americans.
"Forty-three percent of respondents said that Biden and his policies were significantly to blame for inflation, while 18 percent said the president was fairly to blame and 17 percent said he and his policies were slightly to blame, a Newsweek/Redfield & Wilton Strategies poll found last November.
Worse for the Biden administration, even as it portrays itself as pro-union, it also paints itself green. That includes promoting electric vehicles and committing to end the federal government's purchase of cars with internal combustion engines by 2035. That poses big problems for the labor part of organized labor.
"The talks are about more than pay," Jack Ewing noted for The New York Times. "Workers are trying to defend jobs as manufacturing shifts from internal combustion engines to batteries. Because they have fewer parts, electric cars can be made with fewer workers than gasoline vehicles."
"The president is in a really tough position," Erik Gordon, a professor at the University of Michigan's Ross School of Business, told Fortune. "What he needs to be the most pro-labor president ever and the greenest president ever is a magic wand."
With such big challenges as inflation and disappearing jobs, the UAW is responding with equally big demands. The union scaled back its asks of Ford, General Motors, and Stellantis—but still wants a 40 percent pay raise over four years. That, a four-day work week, and a other eye-popping demands including spendy defined-benefit pensions round out the list. That's actually in line with what other unions have won for their members.
Labor unions are, indeed, having a moment. Unsurprisingly, employers aren't thrilled.
Employers Feel Pain and Place Blame
"The UAW strike and indeed the 'summer of strikes' is the natural result of the Biden administration's 'whole of government' approach to promoting unionization at all costs," U.S. Chamber of Commerce President Suzanne P. Clark protested last week. "For the 94% of American private sector workers not in a union, the costs are starting to stack up – from increasing consumer costs – now for new cars – to sudden loss in business for those in related industries like auto suppliers, restaurants and caterers whose customers are now on strike."
This is a problem for the Biden administration and its political allies given that corporate America has been drifting away from its traditional alliance with the GOP. The populist drift of the Republican Party under Donald Trump, growing emphasis on cultural issues, and the former president's unpredictable cult of personality created an opening for Democrats.
"The ongoing development of the Democratic Party as a party not of labor but of socioeconomic elites, and the ongoing development of the Republican Party as a party not of business but of working class social conservatives represents a major, perhaps the major, American political development of the twenty-first century," according to a recent paper by Tufts University's Eitan Hersh and the University of California at Berkeley's Sarang Shah.
But big business flirtation with Democrats may not survive a cold-water dousing from an administration "promoting unionization at all costs." Existential threats can outweigh loose new alliances.
That's not to say corporate America will return to the Republican fold. Trump, after all, is courting UAW support and plans to visit Michigan picket lines instead of debating rivals for the Republican nomination. He's emphasizing workers' fears of job losses as a result of the push for electric vehicles, and of the potential rise of Chinese manufacturers. If business executives are feeling a little disenfranchised right now, they can join the club.
Everybody Feels the Pain
It's important to emphasize that potential perils for the Biden administration in these labor actions are extensions of pain imposed by government. While union pay demands are big, they result from the damage to paychecks caused by the dollar's eroding purchasing power, courtesy of government policies. Union demands for the security of defined-benefit pensions and a revived right to strike over plant closures respond to disruptive policies that seek to force transformation of the U.S. economy along green lines. You can't use the power of the state to remake a country without scaring the hell out of a lot of people and driving them to seek stability.
Ultimately, the UAW is likely fighting a losing cause. Even without government pressure, the auto industry is changing. Automation and the migration of car production to states where workers often vote against labor unions means vehicle production in the future will look different than it does today. Raising costs for the Big Three will accelerate that process.
But Biden's efforts to forcibly reshape the economy in ways that he and his allies prefer, rather than the direction market forces would take it, makes him the obvious person to blame for resulting pain. "The brewing fear among Democrats is that it won't just complicate his labor credentials, it could slow the implementation of his green industrial agenda and the broader economic growth around which he's basing his case for reelection," reports Politico.
That means political risk for a president who gambled on revived organized labor power. More importantly, though, it means chaos and economic uncertainty for regular Americans.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Biden, the 'Most Pro-Union President'
LOL
#OBLsFirstLaw
Never mind coding, auto workers better learn to speak spanish.
Or Chinese.
If they're willing to go mine rare earth minerals for the batteries in "conflict" zones in Africa, they might be able to get by with French.
The beloved leaders in CA aren't going to abide anyone mining the USA's single richest deposit of Lithium without paying a tax that makes the attempt economically futile (and that's before they institute a new State agency to dictate some ludicrous wage for the miners like they've done with Fast Food workers).
How did the 'most pro-union president' work out for the railroad workers?
Let's not forget the success of the Teamsters at YRC.
As if I needed another reason to not buy Ford or GM.
Those people are stupid for trying to make more money. You should burn their steaks.
They are not trying to make more money, they are trying to extort more money for the same tired old goods and services they've been churning out for decades. And given the demand for a 4-day workweek, they want a lot more money for a lot less of those goods and services. Sorry, no sympathy.
With terrible timing to boot.
From 1993 to 2023 — thirty years — I exclusively drove GM cars (except for two years with a lemon of a Ford).
Finally I looked at the price and features, threw up my hands, and bought a much cheaper and supposedly more reliable Subaru sedan. Ask me in five years if I regret it but for now other than a couple little irritants (auto stop/start, and the unstoppable warning light that baby, it’s cold outside)… I’m getting almost the same thing for way less.
I was loyal for three decades, but the prices have spiraled beyond all reason and I don’t get anything special for them, so if they don’t have me, exactly who do they have left once all the old Buy American folks die off?
Ask me in five years if I regret it but for now other than a couple little irritants (auto stop/start, and the unstoppable warning light that baby, it’s cold outside)…
I wish the auto stop/start could be turned off in settings instead of every time the car starts up. Shit that's annoying. Did you get the XT package? Those extra hundred horses are a lot of fun.
Eighty rather. Still, lots of fun.
Only option I “splurged” for was remote start, because winter is a thing where I live. Cargo space takes a premium over performance for me, as most vacations, I drive. The performance is fine. It’s nothing special, but it does enough for my purposes.
That’s another gripe: with Chevy remote start, car kept running when you opened the door. Then you put in the key and turn to go. Subaru? Open *any* door and it just shuts off. It also plays the radio to nobody, instead of not activating it until the key is in (again, unlike Chevy).
But yeah auto stop start should have a permanent disable, yippee, save me, what, 18 cents a month on gas, but then it’ll probably wear out the starter years earlier. It does have a ridiculous number of things thst override it when it’s on, too… turn the steering wheel… defroster running… I forget if having the AC running overrides it.
i bought some thing on amazon (<$25) that connects in between the button for that feature and the fusebox and auto disables it on start up. totally worth it.
for a 2023 crosstrek.
Nifty. My button is on a touchscreen, so it wouldn’t do any good. Thanks for the idea though. Appreciate it. No sarc.
Check out an owners forum online. There might be something that can be jumped in the fusebox or under the hood, or some kind of kit that'll do the auto-disable.
I don't know if Subaru owners are that technical except for the STI drivers who are probably often also "tuners", but there's a lot of info out there on forums for Toyota trucks and Jeeps. If you're in a Cross-track, there might be some sub-groups on some "overlander" boards as well.
The amount of technological doodads in cars these days is unbearable. I have as basic of an F-150 as you can get, and it's still burdened by bullshit like the electronic parking brake, collision sensors, and the TV screen in the middle of the dash. No way in hell do I want to buy any the twin-turb bullshit out on the market right now. And the cost of these things now is fucking outrageous, due in no small part to all the computerized shit they're stuffing in there.
The late 90s-early 2000s was probably the last time we had a decent balance between technology and mechanical functionality. Silicon Valley worming its way into the auto industry has been as disastrous for cars as it has been for any other aspect of society that used to be affordable, functional, and self-sufficient.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I'm pretty sure most of this computerized bullshit is a result of stricter and stricter emissions and mileage requirements from the government.
Take that auto stop/start "feature" for example. It's car companies trying desperately to appease regulators, not customers. Nobody wants that shit.
At least on many newer vehicles the annoying auto start/stop 'feature' is fairly easy to permanently disable with a little help from the aftermarket - Forscan (which is Windows software for Ford vehicles that allows you to configure all kinds of settings that aren't otherwise accessible) works great to get rid of the auto start stop as well as the maddening double horn honk that supposedly reminds you that the thing is running if you get out and close the door...
Correct me if I’m wrong, but I’m pretty sure most of this computerized bullshit is a result of stricter and stricter emissions and mileage requirements from the government.
Some of it is, like the that auto-start/stop feature (yeah, I have that bullshit on my truck to, and it's fucking useless as far as saving fuel. Fortunately I can turn it off with a button push). Electronic parking brakes, computerized door locks, and push-button starts are just gee-whiz stuff that isn't really needed.
Look at Hyundai and Kia. Their vehicles are getting stolen left and right simply because it's easy as pie to hack into their systems. That shit wasn't an issue 10 years ago.
I had a 1985 Cavalier (aka, "The Cadavalier") in college (1994-1997), and I can safely say that will be the last GM product I ever own. I get that the mid-80s were a special kind of low point for GM quality, but parts of that car started to literally fall off when the odometer rolled over 60k (not to mention that half the paint had washed off of the body work by the time I got rid of it).
One time it blew so many different gaskets all at once, that the first mechanic to look at it said the main engine seal must have gone; turned out to just be the oil pan, valve cover, and timing cover though. After that, the water pump came loose from the engine block, and the resulting overheating cracked the head. By the time I got rid of it, 3 of the 4 bolts holding the driver's seat to the chassis had vanished, one of the brake calipers went crooked, and I almost felt guilty taking the $300 I got on trade-in (except that it had a brand new $400 CV axle on one side, decent tread on the tires and a new alternator and battery, so whoever parted it out at least broke even).
I saw the 70s Ford Maverick/Mercury Comet (had a 74 Maverick in HS) on a list of the "500 Worst Cars Ever Built" and all I could think was, that wasn't event the worst car I've ever owned, how could it be the worst ever built?
Meh. Private industry strikes will be moot once we all work for the federal (or state or local) government. That will also make for very simple income tax forms.
Of course, public union strikes will then be more entertaining--and frequent.
If all you have is W2 wages and want to take the standard deduction the tax forms are already pretty easy.
Nobody has pointed out the obvious here. In the 2016 Presidential election the UMW urged it's members to vote for Hilary even though one of her platforms was to end the Coal Industry. In 2020 the UAW urged it's members to vote for Biden even though he's in favor of going to all electric vehicles. Other Unions urged their members to vote Democrat even when it went against what was best for the workers.
All this shows me is that the Leadership of the Unions support the agenda of the Liberal Socialists even when it goes against what's best for the Union members that they are supposed to representing.
The real reason why the goal of the Dem party is to get back to more widespread union membership. It's a great way to create a guaranteed flow of compulsory campaign contributions; the locals claim they don't spend anything on politics, so they don't have to reduce dues for objectors, then they kick a big chunk up to the national orgs like AFL-CIO who spend generously on Dem "dark money" and Super Pacs as well as running their own ads come election time.
When Gov-Gods packing 'guns' dictates everything everyone has to scavenge for Gov-Gods packing 'guns' favors. This destructive uprisings from socialist nations is nothing new and is well known including the currency loosing it's value (fake-fiat).
NONE of this is surprising what-so-ever. It was 100% predictable by literally mountains of history. [Na]tional So[zi]al[ism] DOES NOT WORK. Can we now stop entertaining that BS and restore the US Constitution?
The Constitution doesn't work, either, because there's no way to enforce it.
SCOTUS is suppose to enforce it but you're correct that there's not a lot that can enforce it when the enforcement is packed with evil Al'Capones and Hitler wannabe's.
The people's favor for a USA (defined by a US Constitution) has to exist to get *honorable* SCOTUS judges. Honest citizens with integrity have to outweigh the criminal mentalities that want use the 'gov-guns' against those 'icky' people and STEAL from them.
Well actually the entire Judiciary as well as elected politicians who SWEAR to uphold it. It's no mistake why every political office swears an oath to the people's law over them. Electing *honorable* instead of lawless one's is really every voters responsibility.
This is a problem for the Biden administration and its political allies given that corporate America has been drifting away from its traditional alliance with the GOP. The populist drift of the Republican Party under Donald Trump, growing emphasis on cultural issues, and the former president's unpredictable cult of personality created an opening for Democrats.
Of course, the strikes and their negative consequences are Trump's fault. Thank you, Reason, for staying so predictable.
Another butthurt girl-bullying lewser blames Reason magazine for instigating the vote fraud that robbed poor Christian Nationalist Whiteboy Trump of ---not just the popular vote, but BOTH vote counts that made his adipose ass hit the road. This conspiracy of Black Satan, Soros, and Pat Pankratz' "Country Music and Friends" has bedeviled God's Own Prohibitionists since November 1932, and again after Black November, 2008. It's an effort to blink back the tears of laughter their pitiable situation engenders. *SNIF*
Drifting away? Obama got more money from Wall Street than any candidate before him, and I think HRC beat his total with Schumer as the bag-man promising all kinds of loopholes in the "fair share" tax regime for those who paid up.
trump's populism and outrageous behavior in 2016 turned the tide because he got the attention of a lot of the "working class" union members in the rust belt states who'd been sidelined by their unions' demands leading to closed factories and offshored jobs but when they went looking to the Dems for help all they got was being told to "check their privilege" and to get in line behind the more "melanated" folks.
Gosh, it's almost like the left has been manically trying for decades to carry out a strategy to overstrain American society until it snaps and falls apart, so that they can rebuild it in the image of the Fully Automated Luxury Gay Space Communist utopia of their dreams. What was that plan again? Clouseau- Permethrin or something?
Eloi vs. Morlocks.
wasn't enough O already gave GM to the UAW?
It's hard to tell how many UAW workers realize how much of their pension fund is invested in GM stock. The general philosophy of "Big Labor" leaders, especially the current regime at AFL-CIO, is that everything is a zero-sum game, so anything that's good for the company has to be bad for the workers and the only way the workers can benefit is at the expense of the company and shareholders (as if the workers aren't actually shareholders themselves).
Then there's the constant drumbeat about how the CEO's salary is the real impediment to the workers getting what they want. Nobody's allowed to do the math to figure out that if 100% of the CEO's compensation were split among just the 1/4th of the workforce that's under UAW, each worker would get an extra $20/week before taxes (and probably have their union dues raised by $50/month for the favor).
When Chicago's union goons added dereliction to their "arsonal" of extortion, Mayor Jane Byrne fired the collectivist organizers and hired honest workers to replace them (Peter Bagge take note). This brouhaha while mystical fanatics held hostage the US embassy in Tehran. It was also a year before Reagan ordered a like conspiracy of air-traffic controllers to hit the road. The parallels with Dagny Taggart were obvious from the outset. As soon as the strike began, I sent Byrne a postcard that read: Who Is John Galt?
According to a trade group, the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) power plant emissions rules are deemed unworkable. The group argues that these regulations pose challenges and difficulties in implementation website. This perspective highlights concerns within the industry about the feasibility and effectiveness of the EPA's approach to reducing power plant emissions.