Taiwanese Company Demands U.S. Taxpayers Cover the Higher Costs of Making Semiconductors in Arizona
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company cites regulatory costs and a lack of skilled workers as specific impediments. Biden and Congress can fix those without giving out billions of taxpayer dollars.

The largest semiconductor manufacturer on the planet agreed to open factories in the U.S. instead of abroad. The company wants the government to pick up the tab for the difference in cost, even as it postpones production.
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC) makes semiconductor chips found in iPhones, MacBooks, and computer graphics cards from manufacturers like AMD and Nvidia. In December 2022, Apple CEO Tim Cook and President Joe Biden visited Arizona to announce that TSMC would build a new factory in the state while upgrading and expanding another. "Apple had to buy all the advanced chips from overseas" before, Biden said. "Now we're going to do more of their supply chain here at home." The company pledged to spend as much as $40 billion on the projects.
TSMC had teased the project as far back as May 2020, stating in a press release that it hoped to build a factory "with the mutual understanding and commitment to support from the U.S. federal government and the State of Arizona."
As it turns out, "support" doesn't come cheap: In June 2020, just a month after announcing its intent to build in Arizona, the company reportedly asked the federal government to "make up TSMC's running costs difference between the United States and Taiwan."
In April 2023, The Wall Street Journal reported that TSMC sought between $7 billion to $8 billion in funding from the CHIPS Act, a $52.7 billion pot of cash earmarked specifically toward incentives for semiconductor manufacturers. It also sought an additional $6 billion to $7 billion in grants from the Commerce Department. If fully approved, the government would be on the hook for up to $15 billion, more than one-third of the total projected cost.
Now, however, TSMC says that it will delay the start of production in the Arizona facility until at least 2025, citing lower-than-expected revenues and difficulty finding skilled workers. The company already faced delays last year over a lack of skilled workers.
Nonetheless, the Journal reports that "TSMC faces significantly higher costs in the U.S. compared with Taiwan. [TSMC Chairman Mark] Liu said TSMC is counting on U.S. help to cover that cost gap for about five years."
Given the company's difficulties, it should be a relief that the U.S. has so far not acceded to TSMC's demands. But there are plenty of things the government can do that would have far-reaching benefits beyond just one company.
In a January 2023 earnings call, TSMC Chief Financial Officer Wendell Huang said that while he couldn't give an exact number for the financial discrepancy between building in the U.S. and Taiwan, "the major reason for the cost gap is the construction cost of building and facilities, which can be 4 to 5x greater" in the U.S.
Of course, part of that gap can be explained by factors like the difference in the cost of living—by one estimate, over twice as much in the U.S. as in Taiwan. But in November 2022, a month before Biden announced the project, TSMC wrote in a public response to questions from the Commerce Department that it doesn't "see access to capital as a significant barrier to growth in the US"—rather, specific factors making the project more expensive included "federal regulatory requirements that increase project scope and cost."
Rather than forking over billions of dollars to a single company, the Biden administration should take steps to ease regulatory burdens on expanding companies. Similarly, plenty of firms could benefit from a greater number of high-skilled workers, like those proficient in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) fields. And yet foreign nationals who graduate in STEM fields from American universities face near-impossible challenges to stay in the country and most end up going elsewhere. Congress could help that situation by raising the number of green cards that can be issued annually.
With TSMC's delay, Biden and Congress have an opportunity. TSMC admits that its issues are bureaucratic, not financial, so there's no need to shovel more money at a wealthy company. Instead, lawmakers should get rid of cumbersome regulations and create a more welcoming environment for both businesses and workers.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Begin making more than $7500 each week by completing a very basic and easy home-based job online right now. I made $25,000 last month by performing this online work part-time for about 2 hours every day on eb-61 my laptop. Details may be found on this webpage.
.
.
Detail Here—————————–>> GOOGLE WORK
Are you telling me all the illegals flooding into the country aren’t skilled workers?
Im shocked!
I'm making $90 an hour working from home. I never imagined that it was honest to goodness yet my closest companion is earning sixteen thousand US dollars a month by working on the connection, that was truly astounding for me, she prescribed for me to attempt it simply. Everybody must try this job now by just using this website... http://www.Payathome7.com
Great article, Mike. I appreciate your work, I’m now creating over $35,100 dollars each month simply by doing a simple job online! I do know You currently making a lot of greenbacks online from $28,100 dollars, its simple online operating jobs.
.
.
Just open the link———————————————>>> http://Www.OnlineCash1.Com
They're telling you American schools are producing so much stupid we need to import foreign nationals for the foreign companies we're importing to hire. Heck, we even need to import unskilled, uneducated foreigners because we pay unskilled, uneducated Americans not to work.
Or, maybe they're not offering enough compensation to attract skilled workers? If I were TSMC, I wouldn't want to lose money making chips in the US for companies that would rather buy those chips much cheaper from their overseas operations either.
God luck getting marxist union teachers to allow the schools to improve STEM education. If more people who had a HS Diploma knew a significant amount of math and knew how to apply it to the real world, the "progressive" political cause (and many other flavors of populism) would be sunk.
Bye bye Taiwanese, we'll see you again when Biden's paymasters take over your island.
Good luck with that. TSMC is pretty much the only reason the US hasn't turned a blind eye to China's desire to fuck Taiwan the same way they did Hong Kong. Some folk think it's an obscure treaty or arms sales but when the likes of Intel can't keep up with the process technology and they only sell the nice chips to our side, including chips in the F22 & F35. Yeah, I'm sure they'll find a way to sidestep the amorous incursions of Xi and his cadres and it won't matter which monkey is POTUS now or next.
I'm sure they're also not stupid and recognize they need to shift some things offshore. I'd say build a plant in Puerto Rico and import enough people, say 50% of staff, to get it running and train workers and ask that the Jones Act be repealed with respect to PR.
Oh, a nearly identical island in a much friendlier place. That could work out quite well for all involved if the new immigrants are able to vote and fix enough things.
Instead, lawmakers should get rid of cumbersome regulations and create a more welcoming environment for both businesses and workers.
That's not what we reluctantly voted for.
I seem to recall an American president who DID get rid of regulations.
But he made mean tweets, so that fucker had to go.
this
I seem to recall an American president who DID get rid of regulations.
Racist /s
Not only that, but in a more intelligent (as low as the bar may be) and libertarian direction.
Remember when he tried to stem immigration from China to slow the spread or flatten the curve, as it were, of the "China virus"? Remember how he begrudgingly acquiesced to the One China Policy and then flaunted it by calling President Tsai?
It really is curious whether Trump's foreign policy was truly transcendental genius or whether the international status quo is such terribly orchestrated stupidity and misery.
Both can be true.
“Biden and Congress can fix those without giving out billions of taxpayer dollars.”
But then where’s the “10% for the big guy”? You don’t expect the Taiwanese to pay the graft out of their own pockets, do you?
10%? I betting it closer or actually over 50% with all factors involved.
Don't forget Hunter's cut so maybe 60%
For sound economic perspective go to https://honesteconomics.substack.com/
If you don't have an article on externalities created by regulation, fuck no!
As democrats are the party representing donors and non-taxpaying voters, regulations are a feature not a bug. Most of the big time donors are either foreign, like Swiss billionaire Wyss, or own investors in government contractors regulations help them by making US companies less competitive in comparison to their companies or they are on a cost plus contract or the regulations discourage companies from entering the market The GE chairman estimated that government regs were near 50% of the cost of weapon systems.
Neo: What truth? Morpheus: That you are a tax slave, Neo. Like everyone else you were born into tax bondage. Into a local, state and federal squeezing prison that you now experience with your own diminishing purchasing power and standard of living.
Only because their parents wanted the tax write off that comes with signing you up for So-so Security before you're able to decide for yourself. Yes, it's theoretically optional.
Do we know exactly what the problematic regulations are? Simplifying regulations sounds good in theory, but depending on the details may be a very bad idea. For example, semiconductor production involves the use of some very nasty chemicals. It is important to protect workers from them and to protect the environment from them. Those regulations should not be eliminated.
As-if a $20 fine depresses bad behavior better than a multi-million $ lawsuit and clean-up. Justice is far more effective than babysitting.
Also, yes we do know exactly what the problematic regulations are.
Minimum wage laws work multiplicatively across all industries and even without touching ‘nasty chemical’ or environmental regulation and ensure that those things cost more.
Unnecessary state and federal professional licensing of quintessentially safe work, again, work multiplicatively across all industries even without touching ‘nasty chemical’ or environmental regulation and ensure that those things cost more.
EV mandates work multiplicatively across all industries even without touching ‘nasty chemical’ or environmental regulation and ensure that those things cost more.
Mandatory health insurance coverage doesn’t increase access to care or lower the costs of care but does raise employer’s costs, complicate immigration restrictions and requirements, and again, does so multiplicatively across all industries even without touching ‘nasty chemical’ or environmental regulation and ensure that those things cost more.
…
…
…
I'm pretty sure a lot of it consists of over the top regulation of some specific chemicals and elements used in the semiconductor industry.
Make $9,000-$12,000 A Month Online With No Prior Experience Or Skills Required. Be Your Own Boss And Choose Your Own Work Hours.
Thanks, A lot Start here
Open This Website.............................>> https://www.dailypay7.com/
Amazing how this article goes from talking about 4x to 5x cost to build the facilities to talking about how the government can lower the cost by deregulating and importing more foreign workers. Not one word about the extreme cost of union labor which always inflates construction costs and typically causes massive cost overruns.
The USA has socialized itself out of the competitive market.
https://www.heritage.org/index/ranking
Economic Freedom Index.
Taiwan 80.7, USA 70.6.
While the rest of the world gets smarter the USA gets dumber.
Taking on a load of new Anti-Freedom [Na]tional So[zi]alists which immigration accounts for 80%+ of that mentality. Not all immigrants are the same person and the immigration filter being applied is failing massively which is well fitting to the USA's failing border control.
Why are we paying Chinese company 15 billion US taxpayers money to build this plant. We should be paying US companies. The Chinese company can't find workers to build the plant because they want to pay Chinese wages. They are going to have a hard time finding people once the plant is built because they want their workers to work 12 hours a day for Chinese wages. They should never got this contract.
First of all, Taiwan is not China. Although the Chinese Communist Party thanks you for the conflation.
Secondly, the issue isn't lack of pay. I work in this field, and the problem is primarily in obtaining the right type of engineers domestically. This type of manufacturing has been offshored for so long that the only schools which teach the right emphases are in Asia, or to a small number of PhD research students here in the US. They are offering a very generous contract, but it requires moving to Taiwan for like 6 months or something for training.
The US generates design engineers aplenty, but most EEs don't graduate with knowledge of the intricacies of semiconductor manufacturer, and there is essentially no domestic expertise base to poach.
Exactly. TSMC is a bit ahead of Intel in process technology as things go from 7 nm to 5 nm, yes, I understand that not all processes are created equal but, it is true that overall Intel is perceived as lagging somewhat. These are pretty elite engineers who are going to get paid regardless of where they work. Some, like my brother, actually almost never go into the office because fundamentally they lay chips out in “CAD”, simulate it, beat it up, review it, etc. and finally “push the button” that says ‘build it this way’. Again, yes, I know, it’s an oversimplification but then I’m not writing an article on it as maybe two people would read it.
I'll also second the comment on conflation between the ROC and PRC and even go so far as to humbly suggest that thi may in fact be an employee of emperor Xi and his PRC.
Absolutely right. Tell Apple to buy from Intel and give the money to Intel.
Compared to the other crap we squander money on, seems like a good deal when you factor in the revenue that will be recouped on taxes and the national security issue of being able to produce a requirement of modern life at home.
It's questionable whether the increased tax revenues would put the Feds net positive anytime in the near future.
However, whether the added costs get covered by tax-funded subsidies, or get passed along to consumers in higher prices or to shareholders in lower profits, if we switch to using chips that cost more to make, the tab for those costs will end up getting paid by a wide swath of the US general public somehow. The only alternative is to just not open the more expensive factories and keep using chips made in Asia.
If politicians, pundits, and the US public were willing and able to behave rationally, there'd really need to be a discussion of the cost/benefit factors of the transition. There is clear value in having significant domestic manufacturing capability for critical components up and running as opposed to committing to a situation in which China could fundamentally complicate our ability to react just by doing something as militarily trivial (for a force with their capability) as overrunning the island of Taiwan.
If it wasn't for the geopolitical situation, there would be no reason for this plant to be in Arizona. It doesn't make sense for all the reasons listed in the article. This isn't free markets - this is geopolitical games. It reminds me of that failed Craftsman factory. https://www.foxbusiness.com/economy/craftsman-factory-texas-shows-challenges-reshoring-manufacturing
I work an online job from home and earn 185 dollars per hour. I never imagined I could do it, but my best friend, who makes $15,000 a month at the job, encouraged me to find out more about it. This has limitless possibilities.
.
.
Details Are Here—————->>> https://Www.Coins71.Com