Youth Drinking Is Falling, Not Rising
According to a new study there is no correlation between increased youth drinking during COVID and alcohol delivery.

Alcohol always gets a bad rap. Perhaps more than any other substance in history, we love to blame alcohol for all our problems. During Prohibition, temperance advocates associated alcohol with everything from laziness and broken homes to poverty and insanity. While we have for the most part moved on, alcohol still receives its share of condemnation.
In modern times, one of the chief worries about alcohol is the possibility of underage children getting their hands on it. Those pushing these concerns grew louder as a wave of states across the country changed their laws during the pandemic to allow more types of alcohol to be delivered to consumers' doorsteps. Though youth drinking has long been a target of handwringing, the reality is that fewer and fewer young people are drinking. Rather than overlook this untold story, policy makers should use it to inform their posture toward alcohol reform in the years ahead.
After Prohibition's repeal, many states passed restrictions on youth drinking. Initially most states set the age limit at 21, but the drinking age took a winding road to its modern level. In the 1970s, a majority of states reduced the legal age for drinking from 21 to as low as 18, in keeping with the passage of the 26th Amendment, which lowered the voting age to 18. By the '80s, however, as concerns about drunk driving increased, the legal age crept back up to 21, culminating in Congress passing the National Minimum Drinking Age Act, which tied highway funding for states to a 21-year-old drinking age, in 1984.
Today, the age limit is an established part of American culture, setting our country apart from many of its international neighbors. What is often lost in the discussion is that teen drinking reached its apex in the 1980s and has precipitously declined ever since.
In 1991, over 50 percent of high school students reported drinking alcohol, but by 2019, this had plummeted to under 30 percent. At the same time, the percentage of respondents reporting that they had at least one drink of alcohol before the age of 13 fell from around one-third to 15 percent. Youth binge drinking has also declined by nearly half in recent decades.
These statistics come amid an unprecedented craft alcohol boom that has swept America. But what about the expansion of to-go and alcohol delivery options during the pandemic?
Despite the overall underage drinking trends, opponents of these delivery reforms came out of the woodwork to once again sound the alarm about the children. The Washington Post ran high-profile exposés on undercover sting data showing that COVID-era alcohol delivery was fueling more alcohol purchases by minors. The implication was that teenagers were secretly ordering booze through Mom and Dad's online delivery apps and drinking more than ever.
The data do not back up these claims. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention publishes its biennial Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance System survey, which, among other questions, asks high schoolers about their drinking habits. Using this data, the R Street Institute found no perceptible correlation between alcohol delivery and increased rates of youth drinking during the pandemic.
In fact, from 2019 to 2021, youth drinking fell in 48 out of 50 states. Further, in states allowing alcohol delivery from establishments like restaurants and bars, underage drinking actually fell more than it did in states that forbid such delivery. To clarify, this does not suggest that delivery somehow reduces underage drinking, but it does demonstrate the lack of a connection between the two.
As has so often been the case throughout American history, alcohol is being blamed for something that is not its fault—and, in this case, not even a real phenomenon. Youth drinking is falling, not rising, and alcohol delivery appears to be wholly irrelevant to the conversation. Going forward, policy makers should adjust their attitudes accordingly and find a new target for their ire.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Libations in which America’s youth are no longer willing to indulge. Time to import some foreign alcoholics.
I’am making over $15k a month working online. I kept seeing how some people areable to earn a lot of money online, so I decided to look into it. I had luck tostumble upon something that totally changed my life. After 2 months ofsearching, last month I received a paycheck for $15376 for just working on thelaptop for a few hours weekly. I was amazed how easy it was after I tried itcopy below web…
.
.
Click on the link below…………………… https://Www.Coins71.Com
One might think this is a 'benefit' of relaxing marijuana laws. But I'm not so sure. I think one has more difficulty with school after a night of ganja than tequila.
"But I’m not so sure. I think one has more difficulty with school after a night of ganja than tequila."
You should have stopped with "I'm not so sure." Don't write about things with which you do not have direct experience. Your claim shows your ignorance.
Great article, Mike. I appreciate your work, I’m now creating over $35,800 dollars each month simply by doing a simple job online! I do know You currently making a lot of greenbacks online from $28,800 dollars, its simple online operating jobs.
.
.
Just open the link————————————————>>> http://Www.OnlineCash1.Com
Bud light can attest to that.
Saying nothing about consumption among old people.
Good point. This old person (now 50) increased alcohol consumption bigly during lockdowns. I quit, but liver may be impacted as latest bloodwork shows elevated levels of bilirubin, although it's possible that THC/CBD is causing these elevated levels. Yet Reason keeps pushing alcohol and cannabis.
You use this website as a health resource?
You come here just to make inane comments?
The data do not back up these claims. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention publishes its biennial Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance System survey, which, among other questions, asks high schoolers about their drinking habits. Using this data, the R Street Institute found no perceptible correlation between alcohol delivery and increased rates of youth drinking during the pandemic.
That assumes that high schoolers answer the surveys honestly.
No, it merely assumes that they lie at reasonably consistent rates across time and jurisdiction.
So this could be evidence of less drinking, or evidence of reduced trust among high schoolers resulting in higher rates of lying.
Given high schoolers’ increasing dishonesty in passing off generated essays as their own, is anyone surprised that they might lie about their alcohol consumption, too?
If the study were merely a longitudinal (that is, time-based) study, maybe. But since they showed the same trends based on which jurisdictions did or did not allow deliveries but within the same time periods, your alternative hypothesis must also explain why high schoolers in only those jurisdictions increased their rate of lying.
What's the point? If studies showed there were no murders in America or no underage drinking was occurring, we'd still pass laws prohibiting murder and set a minimum drinking age of 21 with possible exceptions for those who can show a military ID.
"we’d still pass laws prohibiting murder and set a minimum drinking age of 21"
Drinking age came about thanks to MADD. The federal government does not have the enumerated Constitutional authority to set the drinking age; therefore, it is up to the states. It should be up to parents.
The federal government does not have the enumerated Constitutional authority to set the drinking age; therefore, it is up to the states.
Correct. However, thanks to the 16A, it can rob the citizens of the states and then put conditions on returning the money. That's how the federal government is able to implement all kinds of policies that are way beyond its enumerated powers.
But what if it were the opposite? If enough people do something, there's a tendency to make it legal. If even murder became widespread enough, there'd be pressure to legalize it, because why single particular murderers out for enforcement?
"Alcohol always gets a bad rap."
Yeah, because it is a highly addictive drug that ruins lives and kills people. FFS, do better, Reason.
Really, Reason? It hasn't even been 24 hours since you put out a story about how gun owners aren't answering survey questions honestly. Did it perhaps occur to you that maybe Gen-z just isn't too keen on admitting to the government that they were breaking the law?
That's my thought.
Or maybe harder cheaper drugs to get high are just more readily available. Who needs to drink to get high anymore?
When sarc is included in the “Youth” category, the numbers change a lot showing a considerable drinking problem with young Americans.
>>teen drinking reached its apex in the 1980s
we're #1! we're #1! in your face, space coyote!
Hunter Thompson long ago demonstrated that the decline in teen drinking is traceable to the impact of climate change on rum quality.
https://vvattsupwiththat.blogspot.com/2023/07/yo-ho-ho-but-no-cargo-of-rum.html
Bottoms up
Careful. You might summon Tony.
For sound economic perspective go to https://honesteconomics.substack.com/
Liberals fear life.
Ah the slippery slope. One sip of alcohol as a teen and you are condemned to be a life long alcoholic!
"Youth drinking is falling, not rising?"
What the hell's the matter with these kids today?!