Turns Out 'Bidenomics' Means Top-Down Economic Control
Joe Biden's big economic speech is a poor attempt at a branding exercise.

For the last two years, President Joe Biden has been crediting various supposed successes in the economy to "my economic plan." Now that plan has a self-referential name: "Bidenomics."
Biden appeared in Chicago this week to give a long-winded speech on his economic agenda. The basics will be familiar to anyone who has watched a Biden speech or read economic policy coverage for the last few years: Biden touted a playbook that consists of subsidies and spending, rules and regulations, unions and jobs. This was not an announcement of new policies or new ideas so much as a summary, and a name, for what he's already done.
Biden even recycled his old tagline, saying repeatedly that he intends to build an economy from "the middle out and the bottom up—not the top down." It's an ironic refrain from someone whose approach to economics is decidedly focused on top-down control.
Biden's economic success story is dubious by any measure. For instance, he touted recent plans to heavily subsidize semiconductor factories, arguing that these subsidies would both make America a bigger player in the world market for computer chips and deliver high-paying jobs to the heartland.
But the Biden administration's quest to fund semiconductor factories has hit a number of snags, including a lack of skilled workers and higher-than-anticipated construction costs. On several major projects, there are simply not enough workers to fill the jobs. Meanwhile, Biden has larded those projects with unrelated social goals, like child care. Even those with long experience in the semiconductor industry have criticized Biden's plans: Last year, Morris Chang, founder of the Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC), which is currently in the midst of building a chip plant in Arizona, warned that America's efforts to subsidize domestic production would be an "expensive exercise in futility."
In his speech, Biden also repeated a figure he's touted before—that those without college degrees would make an average of $100,000 to $130,000 working in chip-plant fabs. But even Biden's own advisers have hedged on the particular statistic: "It doesn't mean that every job is going to pay six figures," a senior Biden administration official told Time. "That's the average. When you aggregate all the jobs—the four-year degree jobs, the two years, the training certificates—you will get a number like $135,000…But of course it's a mix of jobs."
Many fab-plant jobs, in other words, particularly low-skilled work, will pay much less than the six figures Biden advertised. Graduates of quick chip-fab training programs, Time reports, typically earn about $43,000.
Biden's speech wasn't just about his administration's quixotic quest for semiconductor subsidies. He also ran through what amounts to the greatest hits, or misses, of his administration's economic agenda: "promoting competition" (presumably by waging a series of losing antitrust battles), pushing green energy (via poorly targeted subsidies that might make energy more expensive), promoting unions and union jobs (which will raise barriers to entry, lower productivity, and increase costs in ways that could lead to higher inflation). Bidenomics turns out to mean pursuing the policies he's already pursued, and putting his name on them.
Biden may be taking credit, but voters aren't on board. Inflation—the highest in four decades—has added about $768 in monthly costs to the average American household's budget, according to Moody's Analytics. It's ironic that Biden tried to convert his semiconductor subsidy program into what turned out to be a misleading story about high wages, because wage declines are at the root of America's economic pessimism. Persistent inflation, a substantial portion of which was caused by Biden's overspending, has resulted in a historic drop in real wages. Typical households now have less buying power than they did when Biden entered office. That's Bidenomics.
Indeed, the best way to understand Biden's speech is not as an announcement of new economic policy, but as a branding exercise in the run-up to next year's election. (A memo sent out in conjunction with the speech was authored by Biden's political messaging advisors, not his economic team.) Biden wants voters to understand that he's taking credit for the nation's economy. But according to polls from USA Today/Suffolk and Pew Research Center, majorities of Americans believe inflation is a major problem, and living in the country is too expensive. Voters understand perfectly well that this is Biden's economy—and they don't like it.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Why not just stick with the old name: fascism.
Why not just stick with the old name: fascism.
Because the leftists are still deluding themselves into thinking that's a right-wing thing.
Fascism, Socialism, Communism, Feudalism - all just different lipstick on the same totalitarian pig.
"Central Planning of the economy" is always a core "value" of totalitarians.
And it always turns to crap.
Tough to admit that, reluctantly or strategically or not, you supported a fascist.
If only the Nazis hadn't ruined the good name of Fascism, American progressives would probably still openly support it.
Good thing the commies kept their reputation as enlightened progressives.
You just figure this out as you reluctantly voted for him? This was literally his campaign platform. It didn't "turn out" that way, it was designed that way.
Next up learn about WEF.
I think "designed" is a bit too strong in implying skill. "Intended" is probably closer.
Fair.
Do you think the evil staffers and monied interests are doing this randomly? Every piece is by design even if the will and intellect behind it isn't Biden.
No, I believe they are like a dog following a scent, and their scent is power. Nothing else matters, especially consequences, which are alien concepts.
Everything that’s happened since 2020 has been part of their stated plan.
Correct. Their directions come straight from Beijing.
Beijing.
Ironic as that is also the sound made as the support wires holding up the US economy snap.
What do you mean "might?"
If the subsidies don't, the restrictions on oil and coal will.
Biden is something of an enigma. It's easy to see him stumbling around a stage, looking like he doesn't know whether he's coming or going; or flailing away trying to pronounce what he can clearly see on the teleprompter; or missing steps or waiting for a minder to take his arm and lead him to the mark on the floor.
But even when he flails away at pronouncing words, it's not like he can't see the word, it's obvious he knows the word he means.
Sometimes I have been so bored in meetings or waiting for someone that my brain just sort of goes to sleep. Is that what is happening? Is he surprised at how boring a President's job is, that everyone else gets the fun stuff?
My mother got stuck in a rest home due to nefarious family politics. She spoke 5 languages fluently, had foreign pen pals for 50+ years, wrote foreign language poetry, and the rest home killed her. Her mind went to sleep, she stopped responding to visitors, and then she died. Now Brandon can't speak his own language, let alone a dozen others, and he flounder so much for words that poetry would be worse gibberish than teleprompter flubs. But could his senility just be extreme boredom?
My grandfather was very intelligent, well read. In his last years while dying of Alzeimers, he was left playing with a baby doll and could barely speak a coherent sentence. And yet, when we'd drive down the road doing like 40 mph he could read billboards and signs and speak the words perfectly. Always amazed and saddened me, that somewhere in his disease stricten mind he still retained that ability up until the end.
Vogons are pikers compared to Biden.
I'm pretty sure he's in some kind of mental decline. But the fact that he can still be coherent at all makes me less sure about what exactly is going on. He does have somewhat of a stutter, which probably accounts for some of his fumbling over words, but there's got to be more than that going on. I see the look on his face sometimes and I can only think of my elderly relatives when they were suffering from dementia.
The past 50+ years have proven that he is stupid, liar, and plagiarist. Now he is all that in serious mental decline.
Fucking boredom has nothing to do with it.
Age diminishes human beings not in every way for every individual but it's a real thing. I'm 67 and I'd say I'm half the man I was at 47. My dad is 93 and I'd say he is a quarter of the man he was at 43. Neither of us has dementia. Your world is always getting a little bit smaller. Is some ways it's liberating because you just don't give a shit anymore. And I can still have a lot of fun. But in the end it's just a slog to whatever comes next. If anything. Joe Biden isn't bored. He still gets jazzed up reading off of a teleprompter railing about MAGA Republicans just like he did railing about crack dealers. Beyond that he just doesn't give a shit anymore.
Joe lies when he cries.
And the nation cries when he lies.
Half the nation cries.
A quarter applaud like a chorus of trained seals. Lots of ideologues and partisans can't seem to distinguish (or have their "detectors" swapped) between the lies they want to believe and the actual provable truth.
Fake news. Joe works so hard his eyeballs sweat.
Yes, he's working hard just to speak a sentence or stand up.
A reminder of who Reason staffers voted for back in 2020.
https://reason.com/2020/10/12/how-will-reason-staffers-vote-in-2020/
PETER SUDERMAN
Features Editor
Who do you plan to vote for this year? I do not plan to vote for anyone, for reasons that Katherine Mangu-Ward laid out in her 2012 feature, "Your Vote Doesn't Count." But also because I regret the one presidential vote I did cast.
If you could change any vote you cast in the past, what would it be? I have voted in a national election only once, in 2004, and thus I have only one possible vote to change. But I would probably change it, if I could. The reason I voted in 2004 was mostly because I failed to vote in 2000—when I was a Florida resident living out of state while attending college. You may remember there was some fuss about Florida during the 2000 presidential election, including a fair amount of concern over absentee ballots. So I felt some pressure not to allow that to happen again. I voted for George W. Bush. That didn't go so well either. If I had to do it over again, I would decline to vote.
Did not vote, so why are you complaining Suderman?
So Suderman is to be criticized for not voting for Biden. Got it.
Going on the warpath anywhere, "Bears In Trunks"?
As the poet wrote:
"To search for perfection is all very well. But to look for Heaven is to live here in Hell."
Politics is always a compromised set of choices. Always.
Everyone gets to complain about people who think they get to take your shit and tell you what to do. I might even argue that you have more right to complain if you didn't vote. Voting just lends legitimacy to the whole thing.
there is nothing more disingenuous than his bullshit claim of creating 13 million + jobs and using the covid nadir of february 2020 as the baseline
No kidding. There are still about 2 million fewer Americans working than in Jan 2020. More of those jobs are temp. Real wages have declined 26 straight months now.
Joe hasn't "created" a single job, has yet to even recover.
Government can't create any jobs ever, only move them around (with major losses because of the inherent inefficiency of government), or stop interfering with productive work.
Maybe claiming to have reduced deficits by a huge margin using either the TARP/bailout year or a year that included an extra $6Trillion in "pandemic related" spending on top of the regular operation of the government maybe?
The Biden administration is just the worst parts of the Obama administration redux, and with a less charismatic (and more medically demented) front man.
Bidenomics means regular people aren't thrilled with the economy, but the 20 richest people on the planet are doing OK.
#BillionairesForBiden
But somehow, Charles Koch isn’t doing so hot. He’s lost $211 million recently and $5.64 billion over the year. This keeps up, he might not even make the top 20 after today.
20 – Charles Koch – $61.4B – -$211M – -$5.64B – United States – Industrial
He shouldn't have fired Tucker...
I worry that this will lead to devastating budget cuts at Reason. What will happen to the food trucks?
Not surprising, Biden is a 70's-style Democrat. The best way to grow the economy is more government programs, 70's style!
It would be nice if we could finally put the economic policies of the 1970's out to pasture where they belong.
Definitely.
And indefinitely.
Same goes for Biden himself. It'd be nice if we could replace him with someone other than trump, Newsom, or Kamala as well.
Turns Out 'Bidenomics' Means Top-Down Economic Control
Turns out... "Turns out"... turns... out. Kay, I see someone didn't read his campaign website.
He's a journalist, they get confused about tough questions like 2+2=?. And you're expecting him to read a campaign platform or look at his voting history? What kind of monster are you with those standards.
Who would’ve thought that a very left leaning president who campaigned on it would believe in significant government control of the economy?
Couldn’t see that coming at all.
For sound economic perspective go to https://honesteconomics.substack.com/
This is under "things that were bloody obvious four years ago."
"I'm taking credit for America's economy! (except that bad stuff of course ... that's the GOP's fault)! By the way ... can we get some more 'Murican flags for the stage up here? I don't think we're making the point about how patriotic socialists are!" - Sleepy Joe Biden
What do you care? That's your boy, everyone that writes for reason is a Xiden voter.
^^^ TRUTH ^^^
It's appalling so many seem to understand Nazism isn't a good idea; but continue to vote for Nazi Politicians anyways. Not only has their overblown fears of the 'religious' right never developed; it isn't going to matter much when they end up being 'slaves' of the slavery party while having BS religions like 'environmentalism', 'sexism', 'racism', and 'socialism' being shoved down their throats.
Shocking.
I for one am shocked, shocked! that the Democrats are totalitarian thugs who think a command/control economy is a swell idea.
Milton Friedman is laughing at Biden.
Working part-time, I bring home almost $14,000 per month. I was keen to find out after hearing several others describe how much money they were able to make online. Well, it all sb-02 came to pass and completely altered my life. Now, everyone needs to try this work by using this website. . . Detail Are Here———————————————————>>> workingbitecoin12.com
Biden is Reason's guy -- the preferred candidate of most Reason writers. Because the other guy said some words.