Oregon Partially Repeals Ban on Adults Fueling Their Own Cars
After many failed efforts at reform, the Oregon Legislature has passed a bill allowing gas stations to designate up to half their pumps as self-service.

After years of marginal reforms, a dire labor shortage, and dislocations from natural disasters and the pandemic, Oregon politicians have finally agreed to open up the entire state to self-service gas pumps.
This past week, the Oregon Senate passed H.B. 2426, which allows all gas stations to designate at least half their gas pumps as self-service, meaning motorists can opt into fueling their vehicles if they feel up to the challenge. It also ends the requirement that a gas station attendant physically hand motorcyclists the nozzle before they pump their gas.
The bill, approved by the Oregon House in March, now goes to Gov. Tina Kotek, a Democrat, for approval.
For years, Oregon was one of two states in the union (New Jersey being the other) that mandated full-service gas stations—meaning an attendant was required to fuel most drivers' vehicles.
Supporters of the full-service mandate claim it's a productive job creation measure, a form of consumer protection, a necessary health and safety measure, and a valuable cultural quirk all rolled into one.
Reformers have therefore had to tread carefully when arguing that drivers and gas station owners deserve more freedom in their fueling relationship.
In 2015, the Legislature passed a bill that allowed self-service pumps at night in rural counties—where drivers occasionally end up stranded at rural gas stations that weren't open 24 hours. In 2017, they struck again with a law that allowed gas stations in those same counties to offer self-service pumps all hours of the day.
That was about as much change as the state could handle, however. A carefully calibrated reform bill floated in 2019 that would have let gas stations designate half their pumps as self-service stalled out in the legislature.
The emergency conditions created by the pandemic produced some temporary relief from the mandate. In March 2020, the Oregon Fire Marshall—who enforces the full-service mandate—issued a temporary two-month suspension of the full-service mandate. It came with several asterisks:
Most gas stations still had to have an attendant to enforce social distancing, for instance. Only gas stations open 10 hours per day with posted signs explaining proper fuel pump handling could get rid of their attendant. These stations would also have to document that there are no employees available to watch over drivers gassing up and prove that they've gone through a State Fire Marshal audit.
This suspension of the full-service mandate ended in May, but the temporary deregulation seems to have shifted the Overton Window on whether adults trusted with operating a motor vehicle could gas up on their own too.
The Oregonian reports that in 2021 and 2022, the Fire Marshal also issued a suspension of the full-service mandate in response to heat waves and wildfires that made it more dangerous for pump attendants to stand around outside all day.
This led to another effort in 2022, backed up by a slick astroturf campaign of Oregonians for Choice at the Pump, which came closer to passage.
But a late-in-the-game fiscal analysis finding that the Oregon Fire Marshall would need an unanticipated $550,000 to regulate "consumer pumping" upended this effort. Supportive legislators struggled to find the money, and the effort failed.
This year, it all came together.
Pandemic-era labor shortages have persisted, leading gas stations to continue pushing for an expansion of self-service.
Legislators argued that the pumping public was coming around to the idea as well.
"Oregonians are getting better, [and] more and more familiar with pumping their own gas, and they are becoming more and more supportive of the idea of having the choice of whether they can pump their own gas," said Rep. Julie Fahey (D–West Eugene).
Not everyone was on board.
"I deeply admire the crew of attendants who serve us in South Eugene at our local Chevron station. They comprise all races, genders and ages. This bill has the capacity to fire 50% of them ultimately," said one Scott Bartlett in written testimony.
The state wasn't ready for a full libertarian approach to vehicle fueling. The new law only allows station owners to convert half their pumps to self-service. The other half will have to be staffed by an attendant.
When a gas station industry representative said in a February public hearing on the bill that it would be better for station owners to be able to go completely self-service, the committee chair, Rep. Dacia Grayber (D–Portland), said the only reason the bill was getting a hearing was because of its 50 percent full-service mandate.
"We're not in the business of jobs destruction," she said.
It's true that in the 48 states where market forces have been allowed to operate, full-service gas stations have basically disappeared. Strangely enough, however, these states haven't been left with legions of permanently unemployed and impoverished pump attendants, and it's not because they all moved to Oregon to staff its state-created full-service pumps.
Instead, these workers have gone on to earn a wage doing other tasks—many of which are likely higher paying, more productive, and comfortable than handling gas pumps for customers. They don't need the state governments to create jobs for them in order to have work.
And if full-service defenders are right when they argue that Oregon customers put a higher value on the full-service gas station experience than everywhere else in the country, gas attendant jobs will stick around.
Oregon might have partially rolled back its self-service gas pump mandate, but it should have gone all the way.
Rent Free is a weekly newsletter from Christian Britschgi on urbanism and the fight for less regulation, more housing, more property rights, and more freedom in America's cities.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
I have even managed $20880 merely calendar month by simply working some easy tasks from my apartment. As I had lost my office career, I was very disturbed but luckily I’ve discovered this best on-line career that’s why I’m capable to own thousand USD just from home. Each person can avail this best offer & collect more greenbacks online checking this
web…… http://www.richpaay.blogspot.com
An easy and quick way to make money online by working part-time and earning an additional $15,000 or more. by working in my spare time in 1ce85 In my previous month (bgr-03), I made $17250, and this job has made me very happy. You can try this right now by following the instructions here
.
.
.
Check Profile______ http://Www.Pay.Hiring9.Com
I quit my job and that’s it. I make $120 an hour doing these simple online tasks from home. Also, I make $30,000 a month by working online three hours a day. Also, I recommended q1 for you to try…You won’t lose anything, try the site below and make money everyday…
.
.
.
Further information:>>>>>>>>>>> https://Www.Coins71.Com
Google is by and by paying $27485 to $29658 consistently for taking a shot at the web from home. I have joined this action 2 months back and I have earned $31547 in my first month from this action. I can say my life is improved completely! Take a gander at it what I do.....
For more detail visit the given link..........>>> http://Www.SalaryApp1.com
I haven't seen a full-service gas station in years. I thought they all went the way of grocery stores taking your groceries out to the car for you.
I'll have to visit Oregon just for the nostalgia.
We have a number of grocers in NE Ohio that will take your bags out to the car for you. They are predominantly the high-end groceries trying to distinguish themselves from the Costcos and Walmarts of the world. And they do quite well in the neighborhoods where that service is valued.
There is no similar market demand for full-service gas station attendants. On the contrary, the available evidence suggests that most drivers will spend as much or more on the gas to find the lowest price as they save when they find it.
In Brazil the Political State owns the gas monopoly. That thing doesn't want gougees handling anything that could be improvised into a reprisal against cartel collectivism. The gas stations are not quite like the 1950s scene in Back to the Future, but not far from it either.
Most oil producing countries have nationalized their oil industries. The US and Canada are the only exceptions.
But all Americans care about is the price of gasoline. I was in Mexico City a year ago and the government owned oil company was selling gasoline for a full dollar a gallon less than you could get it in for in the US. Sometimes socialism sort of works.
No, it doesn't. The higher costs are are incurred before it's sold to the gullible public at the pump.
Catch any good donkey shows while you were down there, shreek, or did you just stick with the 11 year old prostitutes?
There's a chain in NW Indiana that does too, and it's not even a particularly high end store. Above a Walmart but below a Mariano's.
My friend Bob who lives now in eastern Penna. points out how allowing self-service eliminates the choice he prefers to have someone else pump his gas, which fortunately he can come to nearby NJ to do. He's also big on checkout service at supermarkets. He'll use this circumstance to show that formal, negative liberty can decrease people's available choices as much as increase them, even though libertarians are big on promoting individual liberty as choice-enhancing. As you can tell, Bob's not a libertarian, but a populist conservative, and thinks we libertarians, and ideologues generally, are deluded by our too-simple thinking.
Right. The best way to enhance choice is to mandate some things, and prohibit others.
Yep. "Clarity is oversimplification." Where have we heard that before?
Mandates are not a choice.
I “choose” to force you to service me.
I’ll try that on my wife.
... Said Mr. Bobbitt to his wife, Loretta...
Miser, give her a bump in her servitude salary. She might think about even serving a repulsive bidenite such as yourself. Pay to play, baby
Probably wants a choice to drive a horse & buggy, too. And where have all the elevator operators gone? And don't even bring up the milkmen, dammit! But wait. Markets have evolved so that we can get milk and all manner of foods delivered right to our doors. Marvelous things those free markets.
The great thing about markets is he can still have someone pimp his gas, or operate an elevator for him. He just has to pay that person himself rather than forcing those who don't want it to share in the costs.
Actually, there are two of them in my Bronx neighborhood. And, oddly enough, they don't charge any more for gas than nearby self-service stations do. At least one other station has designated full-service pumps (at which people do pay more). So people do have a choice. Possibly the full-service-only stations save money by not installing the equipment necessary to remotely control which pumps are enabled to dispense gas, and up to what limits. Or simply by selling cheaper brands of gas. But one way or another, they get by.
Growing up, the full service pumps were always more expensive than self serve.
They also checks your oil and tire pressure.
But you’re right in that I don’t observe NJ or OR to be unusually expensive gas. Perhaps they have lower gas taxes.
In the 80’s a comedian once joked, “Who here will blow a hundred bucks on a gram of coke and then pump their own gas to save three cents a gallon?”
We do have lower state taxes, but still subject to sagging skin suit biden communist gas prices.
And yes, real Oregonians, not socialist transplants, want things just as they are!
Keep your cali, dc, ny, ia, wi out of our state!!
I am also in the Bronx and I also have noticed huge variability in gasoline prices for no obvious reason.
That's a long way to travel from Dog Dick Georgia just to post on your sock, shreek.
Oregon (for now) and New Jersey have mini-service mandated. It's not quite full service as all they do is pump fuel instead of check oil, clean the windshield, check tires, etc. If you get fuel in Mexico, it's also all full/mini-service.
do they have self-checkouts at the supermarkets in oregon and new jersey or are those banned too
They're legal in NJ. It takes time for the law to catch up.
I think SFC banned checkouts of all kinds.
For sound economic perspective please go to https://honesteconomics.substack.com/
Go away.
It's a trap. Check out the blogs on WordPress and Google's Blogger instead: easy access, no intrusive enlistment and plenty of choices.
Literally nobody reads your delusional shit on your web 1.0 free blog Hankie. Fucking kill yourself you stupid senile piece of shit subhuman faggot.
Make me.
Oregonians are getting better, [and] more and more familiar with pumping their own gas, and they are becoming more and more supportive of the idea of having the choice of whether they can pump their own gas," said Rep. Julie Fahey (D–West Eugene).
This line makes Oregonians sound so stupid, so I have to believe that's what Julie-D intended.
She is mocking Oregonians for voting for this. But there is no incentive to vote against it. When you cross north into Washington the gas prices are exactly the same and south into California the gas prices are higher. You know how much prices will change when the law is repealed? Not at all.
She is missing the part where, without incentives, people don't want to do extra work...
Julie, the communist, doped up, multi-sexual moron. (Goes without mention regarding stewgene). More cali bs.
they are stupid. you should read some of the arguments from past attempts to pass this law. oregonians argued that it was unsafe to pump your own gas. these people voted against this bill many times.
I bet that new Oregon governess knows how to handle a nozzle.
Knows how, but refuses.
I did a quick image search -- I know literally NOTHING about her other than that first thing that came back on duck duck go and I can guarantee she's a lesbian.
I know you're not supposed to judge a book by its cover, but... well, if the wallet chain fits.
Now that is good;). But she is all about transgender pumps. Would not know what to do, even with “Brandons” microscopic pump.
"Supporters of the full-service mandate claim it's a productive job creation measure"
You know who else produced jobs by mandate?
The Luddites?
Gigolos?
FDR?
Hunter Biden?
Hell hath frozen over!
But just wait. Some karen is going to spill gasoline all over herself and then set herself on fire. All the media will then be declaring that self service is too dangerous, and they will go back the way they were. But somehow the idiot Californians can manage. Go figure.
THERE's a logical conundrum! If someone with a lit joint torches theirself, the looters will again ban refueling AND weed with eager whoops of joy.
Doesn't matter how you set yourself on fire, Hankie, everyone will rejoice.
Grayber really needs a lesson on the Broken Window Fallacy.
Closer to Keynes. She'd probably vote for a jobs program of digging holes and filling them back up again. Or Marx. who thought the value of something was in the labor input, not whether anyone actually wanted or needed it.
The girl in the article photo shouldn't be allowed to drive let alone pump her own gas. She has her fingers on the trigger of a loaded nozzle for Pete's sake.
You can practically hear her squeaking "Eek!"
I lived in Oregon for a while. It was a dumb law, but it was great. People waited on you, and the gas still cost less than it did in California.
Making half the pumps self service has no justification however. If they're really so dangerous, half of them will blow up the gas station just as quickly. Most people will go to the self service pumps now, because they will no doubt be cheaper and faster. And there will be a hidden tax to pay people to stand around to attend the "full service" pumps. There was a hidden tax before, but at least the people in the jobs program had to do actual work.
Gas costs more in California because of taxes, not because of the cost of labor or operation.
As of 2021 (the last year for which I could quickly find reliable data), the state gas taxes per gallon were:
WA $.4940
OR $.3883
CA $.6698
(The feds layer another $.184 per gallon to the cost but that's a constant in this comparison.)
OR looks to you like a good deal only because the incremental labor costs (when allocated across all the gallons pumped during the attendant's average shift) are dwarfed by the incremental tax costs of CA gas.
Don't forget the "special" fuel required in California.
Special fuel that isn't available from any other western markets (it's only made in California and Korea) and environmental regulation so strict we have far fewer refineries than in the past, but no new ones have been built in my lifetime.
Nobody wants to deal with that shit when Sacramento larps the latest progressive talking points including no fossil fuels a decade from now. Because they know those fuckers will actually preach that religion regardless of how it adversely affects the actual lives of the residents outside of San Francisco.
True, but how it looks is how it is, as far as consumers are concerned. Full service-only gas here in NJ is cheaper than in neighboring states because of tax differences, so people see NJ as a great bargain: full service for less money.
The manager of a service station on the NJ Turnpike told me that full service actually makes him more money. Because the attendants get cars in and out more quickly, he has higher volumes that more than make up for the attendants' pay.
Maybe next time you're there you can spend some time around the front of the store instead in the alley giving blowies for 5 bucks a shot, shreek.
I drove through and tried to pump my own gas and I thought the whole state was going to freak out. I'm lucky I didn't get shot.
I hear that out east where gaspump enforcement dare not go, that people are chill and let you pump your own gas while the obligatory teenager employer just watches.
I used to be a snowbird and travelled through Oregon twice a year. From many of those trips, my strongest memory is sitting in my car waiting for some lazy-assed attendant to arrive from inside the station. In one case, I can remember that the guy sat in the station until I finally got out of my car and started to pump my own gas. So, it's about time Oregon allowed this change.
are you kidding? we've traveled and vacationed to oregon many, many times. i hated having to wait for some dumbass to pump my gas. i can be in and out of the station way faster if i do it myself. i learned to always fill up at the border so i never had to buy gas in oregon.
Every time I hear the claim that people are competent to pump their own gas I'm reminded of this all too common scenario.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4xwsZ5vC5Oc&ab_channel=moneyball32
"allows all gas stations to designate at least half their gas pumps as self-service"
This terminology used here appears to be an error. It should be 'up to' or 'at most', not 'at least'. The bill text actually reads:
"SECTION 2. (1) A filling station, service station, garage or other dispensary where Class 1 flammable liquids are dispensed at retail may not designate more than the same number of fuel dispensing devices for self-service use by customers as are designated for attended service by an owner, operator or employee of the dispensary of Class 1 flammable liquids."
Which makes sense, sort of, because if they were allowed to designate at least half, the word allowed would need to be replaced with 'required'.
If cars were invented today, ask yourself how many of the looter People's States would stand by and permit the production and sale of such machines.
Or anything else. They might permit enough for the slave masters. But without free minds and free markets, where would the incentive be to invent anything?
If aspirin were invented today it would need twenty years of FDA studies for approval.
Oh noes! How will the Oregon stoners know which grade of gas to pump into their Teslas?
Sorry sir, the 3 pumps for full service are out of order today.
Can anyone from NJ or OR explain what the rationale behind this is?
Those Common Good Christian Fascists forcing everyone to refuel to their morality
Oregon cites a bunch of safety bullshit. New Jersey is more straightforward. They claim it is for the jobs.
“Supporters of the full-service mandate claim it's a productive job creation measure, a form of consumer protection, a necessary health and safety measure, and a valuable cultural quirk all rolled into one.”
Perfect opportunity to hire government bureaucrats to observe people pumping their own gas, to make sure they’re doing it correctly, and fining them if they fail.
They should really just ban masterbation. Only state licensed pumping professional should be allowed to service a person's genitalia. Think of the jobs.
In a few years they'll be banning gas stations anyway.
The first time I had to gas up in Oregon I heard someone yelling and looked up to see someone running at me. I thought it was an attempted carjacking until he started ranting about pumping gas and state law. Then I thought it was a prank and was looking for hidden cameras.
Is there a test or training or some sort of license the attendants need before they can professionally pump gas? I mean, if the state is going to create unnecessary jobs by mandating full-service pumps, why wouldn’t it create more with occupational licensing mandates? If someone is going to squeeze explosion juice into my vehicle they better be licensed, bonded, insured and drug free.
Did he have a hazmat suit on?
Back when my Dad ran a gas station in the 1950's and self-service did not exist, I'm sure he had a training program for the teenagers he hired to pump gas. It probably took 15 seconds to learn to pump gas, 45 seconds for checking the oil and cleaning the windshield, and the other 4 minutes were for running a cash register.
Living in a small town in Oregon, after spending most of my life in CA, I am going to miss someone pumping my gas. I expect, however, as in CA, it will take a quite a few years for full-serve to completely disappear. The distinctly older, and more conservative, population in this town isn't quite as likely to want to change their habits.
Some of the OPs have mentioned the lack of check-out lines at supermarkets. Well, we have check-out lines, though self-checkout is available too. Some markets have gone the other way and, while having self-checkout, also offer to do one's grocery shopping for them: My wife orders our groceries on her iPad, I drive to the store, and they load up my Jeep. And these aren't "high-end" grocers, either -- we're talking Safeway and Fred Meyer. This is a trend I like, and I don't mind not spending a half-hour or longer pushing a cart around the market. This doesn't mean I don't visit the fish market or the farmer's market, of course. That hasn't changed.
I love the job creation argument. Just imagine if it had been used throughout the years. "We can't abolish slavery - think of all the overseers who would be put out of work."
I am making $98/hour telecommuting. I never imagined that it was honest to goodness yet my closest companion is acquiring $20 thousand a month by working on the web, that was truly shocking for me, she prescribed me to attempt it. simply give it a shot on the accompanying site.. go to home media tech tab for more detail reinforce your heart.........
SITE. ——>>> bitecoindoller.com
Half a century after everyone else.
Supporters of the full-service mandate claim it's a productive job creation measure, a form of consumer protection, a necessary health and safety measure, and a valuable cultural quirk all rolled into one.
If a law is needed to create the job, it IS NOT productive.