When This Uvalde Parent Complained About a New Police Hire, He Was Banned From School Property
A demand letter states that the Uvalde school district is infringing on Adam Martinez's First Amendment right to criticize the government.

In May of last year, a former Uvalde high school student entered Robb Elementary School and opened fire, killing 19 students and two teachers and injuring over a dozen more. Following the shooting, local police faced widespread, national outrage for their failure to intervene for nearly an hour. Eventually, the school district suspended its entire police force and fired its chief of police.
Adam Martinez's youngest son was at Robb Elementary on the day of the shooting—though thankfully he was physically unharmed—and, like many other parents, he became a vocal critic of the police department. However, in retaliation for his criticism, the school district banned him from school property—and school board meetings—for two years.
On Monday, the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (FIRE) sent a demand letter requesting that the school lift its two-year ban on Martinez or face a lawsuit.
"The First Amendment exists so that people can use their voices to advocate for social and political change," FIRE attorney Jeff Zeman said in a Monday press release. "Criticizing the government is protected speech, and Uvalde can't police it."
On February 13, 2023, Martinez attended a Uvalde Consolidated Independent School District (UCISD) School Board meeting after learning that the school district had hired an officer that the Uvalde County Sheriff's Office had judged "ineligible for rehire," according to the demand letter. During the meeting, Martinez approached Joshua Gutierrez, the UCISD police chief, to express concerns about this new officer.
"As multiple recordings of the meeting demonstrate," the letter states, "their conversation remained quiet and did not disrupt the meeting." However, "in response to Mr. Martinez's calm but impassioned criticism, Chief Gutierrez told Mr. Martinez to sit down. Mr. Martinez, who wished to continue speaking with Gutierrez, refused. Chief Gutierrez then lashed out by banning Mr. Martinez from all school district property and escorting Mr. Martinez and his family from the building."
The next day, Martinez was sent "a formal criminal trespass warning banning him from all school district property, including School Board meetings, for two years."
Eventually, Martinez was able to convince school officials to let him pick his daughter up from school and attend events she participated in, as well as attend his son's baseball practices. However, he is still "banned from all other school property" and "from attending School Board meetings and other functions providing opportunities for parents to voice their concerns."
Further, when Martinez requested permission to attend his nephew's graduation, UCISD Interim Superintendent Gary Patterson refused to answer, instead quipping "It seems like you are very fond of posting about us," in what appears to reference Martinez's criticism of the district on Facebook.
"UCISD banned Mr. Martinez simply for raising concerns about whom the school district was hiring to protect the district's children, an issue of understandable importance for Uvalde parents, like Mr. Martinez," the letter states. "In doing so, UCISD has violated and is continuing to violate the First Amendment."
Martinez clearly has a First Amendment right to voice his concerns to public officials and to criticize the hiring practices of the UCISD Police—and school officials' desire to silence him, particularly in the wake of such a horrific tragedy, indicates a disturbing lack of transparency from UCISD leaders.
"My community counts on me to be their voice, but the district wants to shut me up," Martinez said in the press release. "My fight has always been for the 21 people who no longer have a voice and for those who are too scared to speak up about social injustice."
The demand letter ends by stating that, unless the ban is lifted by May 22, a full-scale lawsuit will be filed.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
"On February 13, 2023, Martinez attended a Uvalde Consolidated Independent School District (UCISD) School Board meeting after learning that the school district had hired an officer that the Uvalde County Sheriff's Office had judged "ineligible for rehire," according to the demand letter. During the meeting, Martinez approached Joshua Gutierrez, the UCISD police chief, to express concerns about this new officer.
"As multiple recordings of the meeting demonstrate," the letter states, "their conversation remained quiet and did not disrupt the meeting." However, "in response to Mr. Martinez's calm but impassioned criticism, Chief Gutierrez told Mr. Martinez to sit down. Mr. Martinez, who wished to continue speaking with Gutierrez, refused. Chief Gutierrez then lashed out by banning Mr. Martinez from all school district property and escorting Mr. Martinez and his family from the building."
This is the kind of thing that usually happens only when nepotism and family relationships are involved.
> "Criticizing the government is protected speech, and Uvalde can't police it."
I predict mass confusion from some commenters over this quote.
Help us out. How can speech be protected if police and other official don't like it?
Seems like something a constitutional amendment might cover. Something about not being infringed or something.
Google is by and by paying $27485 to $29658 consistently for taking a shot at the web from home. I have joined this action 2 months back and I have earned $31547 in my first month from this action. I can say my life is improved completely! Take a gander at it what I do.....
For more detail visit the given link..........>>> http://Www.jobsrevenue.com
I am making a good salary from home $6580-$7065/week , which is amazing under a year ago I was jobless in a horrible economy. I thank God every day I was blessed with these instructions and now it’s my duty to pay it forward and share it with Everyone,
🙂 AND GOOD LUCK.:)
Here is I started.……......>> http://WWW.RICHEPAY.COM
A few of whom would applaud the Sheriff had he shot and killed Martinez for participating in an insurrection.
At the very least, it should have warranted a visit by the FIB, you know two or three SWAT teams and CNN.
Finally, my paycheck is $ 8,500 A working 10 hours per week online. My brother’s friend had an average of 12K for several months, he work about 22 hours a week. I can not believe how easy it is, once I try to do so. This is what I do....
🙂 AND GOOD LUCK.:)
HERE====)> https://www.apprichs.com
I see what he did there. Damn! What a burn! 🙂
If any of those cops had any decency, they’d have eaten their gun.
If they had any decency, they wouldn't have been cops to start with.
Fair point.
The best one yet.
Someday as you are dying in the streets from some of those horrible people you say don't exist you will regret being the Pollyanna you are.
At a minimum, the governing authority in Uvalde should have claimed House after last year’s catastrophic failure.
Uvalde parents don't deserve to criticize the government; they don't even deserve to be alive. They valued the lives of strange cowards in uniform more than the lives of their own children.
Well, there was that one mom.
And they handcuffed her and she didn't even try to shoot them, so...at least she ran in after that. That's as good as Merkins get, though. I think most Merkins would stand and film a police dog eating their newborn baby, then send the film to the news complaining about their own cowardice.
Graveyards are full of heroes who don't live to fight another day.
At least that’s something you’ll never have to worry about.
Uh, what the fuck are you talking about?
Are you sharing notes with IceTrey's victim-blaming of Nazi slave labor?
In May of last year, a former Uvalde high school student entered Robb Elementary School and opened fire
Didn't even have a hall pass.
Mother ****** are damn brave when nobody has a gun. That's why I'm keeping mine.
It's okay. In the comments, you can be brave and say "fuckers" too. 🙂
He should have ignored the trespass, showed up, and see if they have the balls to arrest him. If so? Even better!
Public forum. You cannot be trespassed without committing a crime. Saying things others would prefer not be said is not a crime. Hang those filthy bastards!
He has a family to look out for, and he probably has a job too.
It would probably be imprudent for him to court arrest.
An injunction would be a way to challenge the ban without making himself the defendant. Let the school district be the defendant.
Tell that to Julian Assange.
Even after gross dereliction of duty that was so gross and derelict that it made international news and caused the entire police department to be fired, the agents of the government are still demanding that people respect their authoritah!
This disturbing trend towards attacking the First Amendment has to stop. It must not be tolerated under any circumstances. It is part of Constitutional law, yet, there are those vehemently opposed to free speech and do everything they can to suppress it. The results of this suppression are the reasons for Jan.6.
To know where this attack is coming from is crucial. Of course the colleges and universities share a great deal of the responsibility as far too many of the faculty are post modernist neo-Marxists. Unfortunately too many of them managed to infect local governments, business and education.
"if the freedom of speech is taken away then dumb and silent we may be led, like sheep to the slaughter." George Washington.
Another quote:
"If the First Amendment doesn't work, then the Second Amendment will."
I AM Making a Good Salary from Home $6580-$7065/week , which is amazing, under a year ago I was jobless in a horrible economy. I thank God every day I was blessed with these instructions and now it's my duty to pay it forward and share it with Everyone. go to home media tech tab for more detail reinforce your heart ......
SITE. ——>>> bitecoin.com
We share educational information regarding college offers and scholarships. kindly visit our website for further details.
website>>>>>>>>> http://collegeoffers.org/
Here's the thing. I heard from Chemjeff that Parents shouldn't get to foist their beliefs on other parents in the school. If they don't like how the school is being run, they can homeschool or sit down and take it.
But you are doing just that. My taxes would support your kids no matter what I do with mine.