Blame America's Air Traffic Control System for Your Flight Delay
In countries that privatized, there are fewer delays and costs are lower. But labor unions and the private plane lobby stand in the way.

Your flight is delayed? Blame your government.
OK, it's not always government's fault. Sometimes it's weather or mechanical problems. But often we suffer horrible flight delays because politicians won't relinquish power.
In January, flights were grounded when the government's "Notice to Air Missions" system broke down. That was just the latest incident.
America rightly prides itself on being on the cutting edge of innovation. But it's the private sector that innovates. Government rarely does.
Asked if America's air traffic control system is out of date, Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg paused a long time before answering, "The system is continuously being upgraded."
But the government's been "upgrading" air traffic control for decades, promising to switch to a "NextGen" system that uses satellite navigation. But implementation keeps being postponed. Now the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) won't even say when NextGen might be done.
Air traffic control is still a lot like it was in the 1960s. Controllers use paper strips to track flights. Instead of using computers, they move paper around manually.
"This is your government at work," says Diana Furchtgott-Roth in my latest video. Furchtgott-Roth worked for the Transportation Department during the Trump administration.
I yell at her. "Air traffic control was in your department. You could have fixed it. You should have fixed it!"
She smiles and explains that although she had control of $1 billion, she wasn't allowed to move those funds to where they were needed.
Government managers must fund projects pushed by politicians, like "Justice40," meant to fix "underinvestment in disadvantaged communities."
"Sounds like they mean well," I say.
"It sounds a lot better to talk about social justice," answers Furchtgott-Roth. "Nuts and bolts like computer hardware for air traffic control gets left behind."
Computer hardware isn't left behind in Canada. They got rid of "flight control with paper strips" years ago. That's because Canada turned air traffic control over to a private company. They switched to an electronic system.
It's not just Canada that did it. Dozens of countries have privatized or partially privatized.
Computer screens have replaced not-always-clear windows in many air traffic control centers. Controllers don't use binoculars anymore because high-definition cameras let them see much more, especially at night.
A Government Accountability Office study found that in countries that privatized, there are fewer delays and costs are lower.
So why doesn't America privatize?
Because our politicians get money from labor unions, who "advocate for keeping the same people in the same jobs," says Furchtgott-Roth.
Another opponent is the private plane lobby. Under our current system, Congress makes sure that the big airlines, which you fly, subsidize private flights' air traffic fees.
"If they have private planes," says Furchtgott-Roth, "they should be able to pay their fair share." Yes. Today's pricing amounts to welfare for rich people.
A third obstacle is fear. "For-profit companies will cut corners and make flying less safe!" But this is nonsense. That GAO study found that safety stayed the same or improved in countries that privatized.
Also, "For-profit companies actually run the airlines!" Furchtgott-Roth points out.
The airlines get FAA supervision, but the main reason planes don't crash is because the private companies don't want to destroy their business by killing their customers.
There hasn't been a commercial airline crash in 14 years.
By contrast, government-run airlines do crash. Aeroflot (the Soviet airline) killed thousands of people.
"What ensures high quality is competition," says Furchtgott-Roth. There wasn't any competition in the Soviet Union.
And there isn't any at the FAA.
Today, computers controlling air traffic in other countries keep getting better. In America, privatization would reduce delays and make flying even safer.
But our arrogant politicians won't allow it. They insist government run things.
Since governments rarely innovate, you must sit at the airport and wait.
COPYRIGHT 2023 BY JFS PRODUCTIONS INC.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Easily start receiving more than $600 every single day from home in your part time. i made $18781 from this job in my spare time afte my college. easy to do job and its regular income are awesome. no skills needed to do this job all you need to know is how to copy and paste stuff online. join this today by follow details on this page.
Here is I started.……………………>> http://Www.jobsrevenue.com
"If they have private planes," says Furchtgott-Roth, "they should be able to pay their fair share."
Are we blaming Big Cessna?
Excellent work, Mike. I admire your effort because I currently generate more than $36,000 each month from just one simple online business! I am aware that you may start earning a solid life en-10 online with as little as $29,000 and these are just basic internet operations tasks.
.
.
Click the link—————————————>>> GOOGLE WORK
If someone offers to set you up with a girl nicknamed ‘Big Cessna’, run away as fast as you can.
I'm sure they'll upgrade to fax machines and floppy disks soon.
"OK, it's not always government's fault. Sometimes it's weather or mechanical problems."
Hey, I voted for a government who promised to control the weather!
"It sounds a lot better to talk about social justice," answers Furchtgott-Roth. "Nuts and bolts like computer hardware for air traffic control gets left behind."
Why not both? We should demand a modern air control system with algorithms that prioritize flights based on anti-racism.
I wish people like Mr Stossel actually knew something about the system that they criticize rather than just spout talking points like "it's all the unions fault!"
First of all, ATC is fundamentally a monopoly business. The normal processes that favor innovation in private business no longer apply when a monopoly comes into play. ATC has to be a monopoly business because you can't have competing ATC systems. Everybody in a given bit of airspace better be talking to the same set of controllers or there will be significant problems.
I'm personally ambivalent about unions. I've worked as a union member & as a non-union member. I could go on at length about some of the deficiencies of unions but one thing that I will say is that a big historical problem with unions has been old fashioned greed at the expense of the core business. Many unions failed to appreciate the fact that if the business failed, the union members would also suffer. I will say that NATCA over the last 15 years has learned that lesson & has prioritized collaboration to create a successful ATC system in the USA.
So what do we mean when we talk about privatizing a system like ATC? At best, we are talking about removing government regulations on hiring, firing & procurement. There could be some merit to this but the devil is always in the details. details which are beyond the time & space I can put into this comment.
One important factor that needs to be considered is Mr. Stossel's suggestion that General Aviation (GA) favors the wealthy. Once again, demonstrating Mr. Stossel's ignorance of his topic. Yes, there are many jet share companies which have come to dominate the travel plans for many wealthy people but private aviation goes far beyond that. Comparing the USA ATC system to the system's in other countries is a ludicrous exercise. The USA has on the order of 10x as many GA aircraft as any other country in the world. 87% of the daily flights in the USA are GA & most of them are small planes carrying pilots in training or other small business operations. Most would be pilots around the globe come to the USA to earn their wings because the cost of flying everywhere else is exorbitant.
Regarding the Next Gen issue I will simply say - "An 8 lane highway is a wonderful thing but if it ends in a two car garage, you've got a problem." We need satellite tracking for ATC but it will not solve our problems.
First of all,
ATCHealthcare is fundamentally a monopoly business. The normal processes that favor innovation in private business no longer apply when a monopoly comes into play.ATCHealthcare has to be a monopoly business because you can’t have competingATCHealthcare systems. Everybody in a given bit of airspace better be talking to the same set ofcontrollersdoctors or there will be significant problems.Yep, sounds just as dumb.
Even my dad (FAA academy instructor who eventually ran the ARTS IIA program out of NAFEC) would disagree with you.
You can choose to get non-emergency procedures performed by different doctors or at different hospitals. In that respect at least, healthcare is not a monopoly business. You cannot choose your air traffic controller & no form of privatization would change that. Perhaps your Dad did teach at the Academy but that doesn't mean much since virtually all ATC training takes place at your assigned facility.
Argument from analogy is usually wrong; this one is profoundly, stupidly wrong.
Well, you could have the landowner decide which air traffic control provider manages the air traffic above his/her land.
And if the landowner doesn't pick one, airlines will just have to avoid his/her airspace because he/she hasn't consented to them flying over.
ATC doesn't have to be a monopoly. Yes a particular airport can only use one system, but that doesn't mean there can't be competition between companies vying to be that system, and a different airport can be using a different system. If one company makes a significant innovation or provides better service other companies will have to keep up or risk losing contracts.
In theory you are correct, the operator of a particular airport CAN select the operator of the local tower. Something similar takes place for many small airports under the Federal Contract tower system although it is actually the FAA that puts out bids to a small # of contract tower operators (full disclosure, I work for one of them; Midwest ATC)
The primary issue isn't the towers. It's the approach control & en route facilities. This is the system that handles flights after they leave a given airport & flying between airports. This has to be a seamless system. Back to the airport towers; the tower I work at was managed by a different company at one point & when tower contracts came up for bidding at one point, the contract switched to the current management. The controllers at the facility didn't actually change, just the people acting as middlemen for the FAA.
Here's another potential issue. If a contract changes & the previous contract holder decided not to cooperate in the changeover, I want you to think about the disruption that would take place as the contract "loser" takes the controllers & as much equipment as possible out of the tower. Even at small towers it can take several months to train a new controller - when they are being trained by the current controllers! Imagine having to reconstitute a tower staff from scratch! Imagine trying to do so at a complicated tower like ATL, JFK or DFW where it takes a year or more for the experienced controllers to train new controllers! How many major cities can afford to shut down a control tower for a year or more while they reconstitute the ATC team? This truth can give a current contract holder a great amount of leverage when negotiating terms if they are willing to "burn the house down" to get what they want. You also know that agile negotiators do not have to be blatant enough about such threats that they discredit themselves (in regards to other contracts that they may hold) in the process. Keep in mind that the contract holder in your scenario would be negotiating with a city government, not the Feds. I know a major airport that handles millions of passengers a year that is operated as a division of the local municipality's Department of Parks & Recreation. Do you really think that they could handle such responsibility?
PROBLEM CORE -----> Gov-Gangster-Guns don't make Traffic Control.
It's the CORE PROBLEM in the USA right now being conquered by [Na]tional So[zi]alists (syn; Nazi's) and the EXACT same ideology of the German Nazi's ... Gov-Gangster-Guns can make anything.
An important fact that I am pointing out in addition to my previous comment. Lockheed Martin operates the Flight Service system which in turn operates the NOTAM system. In essence, the NOTAM system is already privatized. who are you going to blame now?
Flight Service has been contracted for several years now to Leidos Holdings, Inc., a publicly-traded company.
The NOTAM hardware that failed was located at the National Flight Data Center, in the Command Center at Vint Hill, Va.
And I agree with you, Stossel is clueless about this matter.
Stossel has issued some insipid prattle here. He has no idea what he's going on about. I'll bet Robert Poole dictated this to him.
I'd have to research the exact numbers but I am confident when you look at cost per flight operation, the American ATC system is far more efficient than the systems in place in any other modern country.
Comparing the American Air Traffic System to the air traffic systems of other countries is ludicrous because the American ATC system handle much greater volume of commercial & private aviation than is handled by any other system many times over. It's like comparing the US military to the Canadian military. I have great respect for our northern neighbors but their military isn't designed to do, nor is it capable of doing the same things as the American military. Yes, the military budget is full of pork to satisfy the various politicians who have contractor factories in their districts but it is still a poor comparison.
Hey,
Apkhopes is an android App website that provides a wide range of high-quality Android applications to its users. With a user-friendly interface and a vast selection of apps to choose from, it has become a go-to destination for many Android users looking to find the best apps for their devices. One of the standout features of Apkhopes is its commitment to providing a safe and secure environment for its users.
The website has robust security measures in place to protect user data, and all of the apps available on the site have been thoroughly tested to ensure that they do not collect any unnecessary data. In addition to its focus on security, Apkhopes is also dedicated to delivering a seamless user experience.
The website https://www.apkhopes.com/ is easy to navigate and provides users with all of the information they need to make informed decisions about the apps they download. Apkhopes has a wide range of apps available, including productivity tools, social media apps, the Best Android Apps, the Best Android games, and more.
Some of the most popular offerings on the site include a task manager, a social media platform, and a range of addictive and challenging puzzle games, Fighting Games, Racing Games, and action games.
Well John how about you ask Bill Clinton why the ATC system hasn't been updated? I believe in 1995 Clinton had all of the funds in designated accounts moved into the General Fund. This gave the illusion of a budget surplus. One of those funds was the Airport Improvement Program. the AIP had put out a request for bids for an ATC upgrade but had to cancel the requests after their funds were taken.