Gigi Sohn Withdraws FCC Nomination Due to Politics, Policy, and Police Pressure
While Sohn’s record raises ethics and judgment questions, some attacks against her lacked merit.

Gigi Sohn, a career tech regulatory advocate and distinguished fellow at Georgetown Law, has withdrawn from the confirmation process to be a Federal Communications Commission (FCC) commissioner. President Joe Biden nominated Sohn three times, starting in October 2021, but she never secured the Senate's approval.
Sohn confirmed her withdrawal in a statement decrying the 2–2 Republican–Democrat "deadlock" at the FCC. She attributed her stalled confirmation to "legions of cable and media industry lobbyists, their bought-and-paid-for surrogates, and dark money political groups." It would be more accurate to say that politics and policy differences played a role in dooming her bid to fill the fifth FCC chair.
On the politics front, Sohn suggested in an October 2020 tweet that Fox News is "state-sponsored propaganda," potentially worthy of senatorial scrutiny. Days later, she tweeted, "Republicans know that the only way they can win is to suppress the vote." Republicans have also objected to her characterizing Brett Kavanaugh as an "Angry white man." (In her most recent nomination hearing, she labeled some of her previous statements "sharp" and "more partisan than I would even prefer.")
During the 2022 election cycle, Sohn donated modestly to the campaigns of Democratic Sens. Catherine Cortez Masto (D–N.V.), John Fetterman (D–Pa.), Michael Bennet (D–Colo.), and Raphael Warnock (D–Ga.), the last of whom sits on the Senate Commerce Committee, which reviewed Sohn's nomination. And yet it was Democratic holdouts who kept Sohn off the FCC: Shortly before The Washington Post first reported Sohn's withdrawal on Tuesday, Sen. Joe Manchin (D–W.V.) announced his opposition to her nomination. Sens. Jacky Rosen (D–Nev.) and Kyrsten Sinema (I–Ariz.) also voiced concern over various elements of Sohn's record during her nomination hearings.
While partisan politics drove some criticisms of Sohn, many of her critics had policy concerns. For instance, Sohn has championed net neutrality despite evidence that its brief implementation by the FCC slowed investment in broadband networks. She is also unmoved by developing case law that suggests unilateral FCC mandates are likely illegal.
While free marketeers opposed her position on net neutrality, Sohn also had critics among the friends of bigger government. The Fraternal Order of Police (FOP) attacked her affiliation with the Electronic Frontier Foundation, a nonprofit that has defended robust end-to-end encryption. The FOP also criticized a Sohn retweet advocating the end of qualified immunity, among other reforms.
There was even an ethics angle: Locast, a nonprofit on whose board Sohn served, illegally retransmitted broadcast signals and quickly shuttered after losing in court. After Sohn's first Nomination, the plaintiffs agreed to shrink the $32-million settlement to $700,000. "On the day after she was nominated to her powerful regulatory position, broadcasters agreed to a settlement that cut the liability of her nonprofit by 98%," The Wall Street Journal's Editorial Board observed. "Interesting timing." Sohn subsequently withheld these details during a nomination hearing in December 2021.
She might've prevailed if Sohn had only to contend with the FOP. But she was also a public partisan firebrand with her own technocratic ideas for expanding the FCC's role in regulating the internet.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
She's a technocrat elitist who shouldn't be anywhere near any regulatory role of any kind.
She is also unmoved by developing case law that suggests unilateral FCC mandates are likely illegal.
lol no bureaucrat agrees with limits to their power.
She had no ethics...who the fuck are you kidding. She was rightly rejected by the Senate. It was an idiotic nomination.
definitely a three strikes you're out situation.
It’s more like, “23 strikes and 4 foul balls? Get the fuck off the field.”
Censorious leftist withdraws from FCC Nom. Now she has time to make a pass at Nina Jankovic.
would throw a fiver at Jankovic being a hoot in the sack.
Definitely a "would".
She looks like Quentin Tarantino in drag.
Assuming you're referring to Sohn and not Jankovic, I was gonna say she looks like Woody Allen just wearing a couple earrings.
Locast should have been front and center from the beginning. The plaintiffs agreeing to reduce the judgment would be bad enough from an ethics standpoint. I'm sure all of those plaintiffs are regretting their decision now that she's out. But the idea that an FCC Commissioner, a lawyer no less, thought that pirating broadcast signals was legal should have disqualified her from consideration for any job requiring even a modicum of common sense.
10-year-olds sharing music with Napster were held financially liable for putting some songs on the internet. Gigi Sohn should take the L and consider herself lucky she's rich and has powerful friends.
Sohn confirmed her withdrawal in a statement decrying the 2–2 Republican–Democrat "deadlock" at the FCC.
In other words, a very partisan Democrat refuses to work with anyone but her side and cannot/will not compromise. Good riddance.
I'd love to hear her thoughts on whether the strictures of "net neutrality" should be applied to platform companies like fb, google/alphabet, and twitter, which essentially held "monopoly power" levels of market share (and were already engaging in ideological censorship) when the biggest battles were happening over whether or not Obama's "Open Internet Order" which applied only to cable-based ISPs was the only way to protect "the internet as we know it".
I'm also curious if she's "evolved" along with most of the rest of the left from thinking that the internet needs to be protected from corporate censorship at all costs to thinking that what's really needed is a regulatory structure which will require companies providing platform services online to be more aggressive with their censorship, especially of "foreign misinformation" (which appears to be the newspeak term for "anything conflicting with left/progressive/identitarian dogma").
I worked part-time from my apartment and earned $30,030. After losing my previous business, I quickly became exhausted. Fortunately, I discovered this jobs online, and as a result, I was able to start earning money from home right away. Anyone can accomplish this elite career and increase their internet income by….
After reading this article...............>>> http://www.jobsrevenue.com
So which attacks "lacked merit?" I missed that part in the article.
Has Biden nominated anyone who was remotely competent and ethical?
Wow, Rachel Maddow has really let herself go...
Wait a bolshie doesn't win? In DC? If only the Senate could do the same with many of Biden's appts (Secretary of State, CIA, and others).
"...some attacks against her lacked merit...' Thanks for the chuckle. With the number of attacks against her that certainly did contain merit, that is really a moot point. She's a leftist bureaucrat whose track record looks like a muddy road.