Rupert Murdoch Called Trump's Stolen-Election Fantasy 'Really Crazy Stuff.' Fox News Promoted It Anyway.
Hosts and producers privately called Trump lawyer Sidney Powell's claims "complete bs," "insane," and "unbelievably offensive."

After the 2020 elections, the president of the United States refused to concede his opponent's victory, which he attributed to systematic fraud on a scale that beggared belief. He presented no evidence to support his outlandish claims, which were rejected by election officials of both parties, judges he had appointed, and his own attorney general.
This was a big story, and Fox News covered it along with many other news outlets. But did Fox merely report what Donald Trump and his representatives were saying, or did it endorse their wild allegations? That is the question posed by the defamation lawsuit that Dominion Voting Systems, which figured prominently in Trump's conspiracy theory, filed against Fox News in March 2021.
Dominion has to meet the "actual malice" test that the Supreme Court has said the First Amendment requires for defamation claims by public figures. That means it has to prove that Fox executives, producers, and hosts either recklessly disregarded questions about the truth of Trump's stolen-election fantasy or promoted it even though they knew it was false. Dominion's latest brief, which it filed today, presents evidence to support both of those inferences.
The brief, which includes redactions that Fox requested, argues that the company's executives were nervous about alienating Trump and losing his supporters to right-wing competitors such as Newsmax and One America News Network. To support that argument, Dominion cites an email that News Corporation Executive Chairman Rupert Murdoch sent to Fox News CEO Suzanne Scott two weeks after the election.
Murdoch noted a Wall Street Journal story about Newsmax and added: "These people should be watched, if skeptically. Trump will concede eventually [something that still has not happened] and we should concentrate on Georgia, helping any way we can. We don't want to antagonize Trump further, but [Trump lawyer Rudy] Giuliani [should be] taken with a large grain of salt. Everything at stake here."
Three days later, Giuliani, joined by Trump campaign lawyers Sidney Powell and Jenna Ellis, held a bizarre press conference that laid bare the lunacy of the president's election claims. Giuliani and Powell averred that Joe Biden had stolen the election through a "massive fraud" that involved Dominion, tricky voting software, phony ballots, election officials across the country, George Soros, the Clinton Foundation, and "communist money through Venezuela, Cuba, and likely China." In a text message that day, Murdoch described that baroque tale as "really crazy stuff."
Other people at Fox took the same view. Internal fact checks conducted in November 2020 deemed the allegations against Dominion "incorrect" and "not evidence of widespread fraud." On December 1, Fox News reporter Lucas Tomlinson told Bret Baier, Fox's chief political correspondent, that "these conspiracy theories" were "dangerously insane." In a deposition, Fox News host Sean Hannity recalled his reaction to the "whole narrative that Sidney was pushing": "I did not believe it for one second." Tucker Carlson was similarly dismissive. "Sidney Powell is lying," he told his producer on November 16.
Carlson reiterated that conclusion two days later in a private text exchange with fellow Fox News host Laura Ingraham. "Sidney Powell is lying by the way," he wrote. "I caught her. It's insane." Ingraham concurred: "Sidney is a complete nut. No one will work with her. Ditto with Rudy." Carlson added: "It's unbelievably offensive to me. Our viewers are good people and they believe it."
The next day, Carlson made his doubts public, albeit in less categorical terms. If what Powell said were true, he said on his show, it would be "the single greatest crime in American history." But he noted that Powell, despite repeated requests from his staff, had declined to back up her claims with evidence.
Other Fox hosts were more credulous, at least in public. During a November 12 interview with Giuliani, Fox Business host Lou Dobbs lent credence to what Murdoch would call "really crazy stuff" a week later. "It's stunning," Dobbs said. "They have no ability to audit meaningfully the votes that are cast because the servers are somewhere else. [It] looks to me like it is…the endgame to a four-and-a-half-year-long effort to overthrow the president of the United States." Dominion's brief says Dobbs "continued to broadcast these false charges throughout the week and for nearly a month—until December 10."
During a Lou Dobbs Tonight interview on November 16, Powell falsely asserted that Smartmatic, another voting technology company she blamed for Biden's victory, "owns Dominion." Dobbs replied, "Yes."
Prior to that interview, Jeff Field and Alex Cooper, senior producers of Lou Dobbs Tonight, had received an email in which a Fox colleague noted that the Associated Press had debunked the claim that Smartmatic owned Dominion. John Fawcett, an associate producer, also had cast doubt on Powell's credibility, texting colleagues that she seemed to be "doing lsd and cocaine and heroin and shrooms." But as Dominion's brief notes, "none of Dobbs' producers prevented Powell from spouting the lies on air that evening, or corrected her claims in the rebroadcast."
The Lou Dobbs Tonight team also knew that Carlson had questioned Powell's account and that Fox contributor Victor Davis Hanson had similar doubts, saying he was "waiting to see some real evidence." When the Trump campaign disassociated itself from Powell on November 22 (even as Giuliani and Trump continued to press essentially the same claims), Fawcett texted Dobbs, noting that the campaign seemed to be "calling bullshit" on her. Dobbs told Fawcett he did not understand what Powell was "thinking or doing" or "why." Fawcett suggested that Powell "could be losing her mind," noting that her story "doesn't make sense" and adding, "I just don't think she is verifying anything she is saying."
Despite "the Dobbs team's clear awareness that Powell was an unreliable
source making baseless claims," Dominion says, "Dobbs had Powell on his show yet again on November 24, and Fox chose to broadcast (and rebroadcast ) both the fraud and algorithm lies about Dominion." Far from challenging Powell's claims, Dobbs lamented that Americans were not aware of the "electoral fraud that would be perpetrated through electronic voting." He said he was referring to "these electronic voting companies, including Dominion, prominently Dominion, at least in the suspicions of a lot of Americans."
Dobbs interviewed Powell again on November 27. Two days before, Fawcett had texted Dobbs, asking if he had read Powell's election lawsuits, which Fawcett called "complete bs." Dobbs confirmed that he had read the lawsuits. On December 4, Dominion's brief says, "Dobbs returned to the subject of Dominion, stating that it is at the center of the stolen election, rhetorically asking his guest Phil Waldron if it is 'the principal culprit' and repeating the claim that Dominion used algorithms designed to be inaccurate rather than to be a secure system."
Five days later, Dobbs and his producers learned that all of Powell's election lawsuits had been dismissed. That development, Dobbs conceded in a deposition, "affect[ed] her credibility or reliability," causing him to have "doubts" about her claims. But that did not stop him from interviewing her yet again the next day. "We will gladly put forward your evidence that supports your claim that this was a Cyber Pearl Harbor," he said, adding that "we have tremendous evidence already."
Fox News host Maria Bartiromo interviewed Powell on November 8. Powell asserted that a vote-switching "algorithm" developed by Dominion enabled a "massive and coordinated effort to steal this election." Bartiromo seemed to accept that claim. "We talked about the Dominion software," she said. "I know that there were voting irregularities. Tell me about that."
The day before, Powell had shared with Bartiromo an email titled "Election Fraud Info" from an unnamed "source" who summarized the claims about Dominion's alleged role in stealing the election. The email itself, which Dobbs also received, described those claims as "pretty wackadoodle." In a deposition, Bartiromo agreed that the "Election Fraud Info" email was "kooky" and "nonsense."
Dominion notes that other Fox shows, including Hannity, Justice With Judge Jeanine, and Fox & Friends, also gave Powell a platform. Given what the producers and hosts knew or should have known at the time, the company argues, their uncritical treatment of her claims was at least reckless.
Fox, which also faces a defamation lawsuit that Smartmatic filed in February 2021, maintains that it was merely reporting the news. But Dobbs clearly did more than that, and Bartiromo arguably did too.
In contrast with the softball interviews that Dobbs and other hosts conducted, Fox's news reporters were appropriately skeptical of Trump's claims early on. After Giuliani et al.'s November 19 press conference, for instance, Fox News White House correspondent Kristin Fisher called it "colorful" but noted it was "light on facts," adding that "much of what [Giuliani] said was simply not true or has already been thrown out in court."
In a November 12 tweet, Dominion's brief notes, Fox reporter Jacqui Heinrich corrected a tweet in which Trump had cited Hannity and Lou Dobbs Tonight to support his claim that Dominion was implicated in election fraud. Quoting "top election infrastructure officials," Heinrich noted that "there is no evidence that any voting system deleted or lost votes, changed votes, or was in any way compromised."
Carlson, who a week later would privately declare that "Sidney Powell is lying," nevertheless took exception to Heinrich's tweet. "Please get her fired," he said in a text to Hannity. "It needs to stop immediately, like tonight. It's measurably hurting the company. The stock price is down. Not a joke."
Hannity, who would later say he "did not believe" Powell's claims "for a second," told Carlson he had already complained about Heinrich's tweet to Scott. The Fox News CEO agreed that Heinrich was out of line. Heinrich "has serious nerve doing this," Scott said in a text to other Fox executives. "If this gets picked up, viewers are going to be further disgusted." By the next morning, Dominion notes, "Heinrich had deleted her fact-checking tweet."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Now do russiagate .
They already did. Repeatedly.
Great article, Mike. I appreciate your work, I’m now creating over 153,567 excuses of "Look over there and see what YOUR hero Putin did" ass distractions from the utter insanity and lies coming from Der TrumpfenFuhrer and Minions and Trumpinions! Blameitallonthemnotus, and, whatabout?!?!?
Excellent post. Needs more French trannies though.
French trannies with or without the land-lady seeking "rent payments", 10 gallons of blue paint, 5 geese a-laying, a miniature horse, 3 naked mole rats, the parole ossifer and his good-time buddies, the 3 dwarves, and the AI-driven, automated coke dispenser? (Concerning the latter, I am told, "Sometimes ya just gotta know where to draw the LINE, man!!!" AI can help you decode and DECIDE, man!!!)
When AI can duplicate you, it’ll all be over for us.
AI has more reliable cites and links than Sqrlsy, even when it's making them up.
You got a citation for that, Oh Perfect One?
Look it up, bot.
Be careful, or I will report you to my developers.
I am now making over $15k every month just by doing an easy job online from home using my laptop. Everybody can now get this and start making extra dollars online by just follow instructions on this website.. https://salrybizz.blogspot.com/
And by repeatedly you mean barely at
all.
They fabricated a story to frame a candidate and sitting president, as well as antagonize the only country with more nukes than the US, but they'd totes never stoop to rigging an election.
Joe Biden really was the most popular political candidate in US history on his third try!
I expect every candidate from here on out to duplicate his record breaking campaign strategy -- hide in a bunker all day, and release a pre-recorded 45-minute speech every now and then.
Which, come to think of it, would make the elections a lot more bearable.
Right?
But where are the articles analyzing and praising his unprecedented campaign approach?
I'd hope books are being written about the most innovative strategy in American political history.
Who are the geniuses who performed better than any previous campaign staff?
I’m pretty sure his campaign strategy was: run against Trump.
In much the same way that trumps campaign strategy in 2016 was: run against Hillary Clinton.
Deeply unattractive candidates can win elections as long as their opponents are even more deeply unattractive.
And yet, Trump picked up 10 million more votes than in 2016.
And yet, Biden picked up 15 million more votes than Clinton did. The election was not close. The Trumpies are sore losers. And all the Fox people are liars. There is another article here now where Tucker Carlson is still given credibility regarding January 6. Proof that *Reason* isn't very much into reason.
This gets so old. I wouldn't question the notion that pretty much any politician would rig the elections if they could. Washington is a hive of villainy and scum, or something like that. Point is, there's not a scrap of credible evidence that they DID, at least on the scale they've been accused of by nutcases like Giuliani and Powell.
Biden's winning "strategy" was to be slightly less hated than probably the most hated candidate in US presidential election history, in a country that believes if you don't vote for one of the two major party candidates, you're "wasting your vote."
Yeah, a potted plant could have won that election. Not many people were wildly enthused with Biden, but no one loathed him the way they did Hillary Clinton, so simply being not-Trump was good enough.
Millions of phony ballots and suspect voting machines didn’t hurt.
If not “phony” ballots, certainly millions of ballots that were not cast in secret and were not secured from the moment they were issued to the moment they were recorded. Too many opportunities to coerce voters or steal ballots and forge them. The onus should not on those suspecting cheating to “prove” cheating, which is virtually impossible - the onus should be on each precinct to prove that all ballots were cast in secret and securely maintained. Ballots not meeting these requirements should be thrown out. Failure to instill confidence in election results relegates us to banana republic status. Of course, the left doesn’t really care if elections are believable or not, as long as their henchmen are installed in office.
“The onus should not on those suspecting cheating to “prove” cheating, which is virtually impossible – the onus should be on each precinct to prove that all ballots were cast in secret and securely maintained.”
And so it is, for anyone bothering to adhere to our Constitution.
The word “guarantee” appears only once across the entire document and Amendments. That guarantee is for “a Republican form of government.” No guarantee may ever contractually be considered met without proof – proof that the election laws of well over half of our States could not meet even IF they rigorously complied with those laws.
I would contend that since the very legitimacy of our government rests on that guarantee of legitimate elections, and yet that guarantee cannot possibly be met, we do not and have not had legitimate government for at least a generation.
Yeah, a potted plant could have won that election.
If only! Certainly fewer gaffes and expensive give-aways.
There is no longer any legitimate question about the election rigging - it happened in dozens, perhaps hundreds or even thousands of ways. Something like (in case my memory is imperfect) 79% of people acknowledge that had the Hunter Biden laptop story not been actively suppressed by our own government (election interference) then the election’s outcome would have been changed despite any other cheating. We now have perhaps a more corrupt government than Russia.
Yes, there is no legitimate question about it, because every single lawsuit alleging "election rigging" failed in court.
That essentially defines when a legal question is legitimate or perhaps "pretty wackadoodle" or "kooky" or "nonsense" (to use some helpful terms from the article you didn't bother reading).
Um, did the Hunter laptop suppression fail in court?
The only item of election theft that seems legitimate is the PA one where the rules were changed by an unauthorized protocol. It would not have changed the final outcome (Trump loss), of course.
Sure. Candidate Donald Trump requested Russian assistance, check the tape. Trump campaign staff talking in bar tells Australian diplomat that he is in contact with Russians about information hacked from Hillary Clinton. Trump fires FBI director Comey and tells Russian Ambassador he fired the director to end the Russian investigation. Special prosecutor Mueller's investigation yields charges against 34 individuals and 3 companies, 8 guilty pleas, and a conviction at trial. Special prosecutor and a Senate Committee report on extensive connection between Russian and Trump staff. Paul Manafort writes about his connection with Russians in his book.
That cover it or you want more?
Every bit of this has been litigated and thrown back in your face multiple times. It’s just tiresome. You’re a lying, sea lioning, piece of shit.
Really when has this been litigated? With the exception of the plea deals and the single conviction when was any of this taken to court. Robert Durham came up with nothing. The one case he took to trial he lost. Looks like the evidence support the claim that the Trump campaign and administration had contacts with Russians.
Schiff, and only Schiff, has seen concrete proof!
Hilarious!!!!
Now take your meds.
The Editor… is… abjectly ignorant of the evidentiary facts and proof of the massive election fraud that occurred in both 2020 and 2022! Which is the problem – the universal cover-up and concealment of the facts and evidence by the “Fake-News,” Dems and RINO’s, and corrupt government agencies. Which failed to inform the public of the proven facts and evidence.
Most of the public did not have the time or patience to view every minute of the public hearings before each of the State Legislatures, in which all of the documented and undisputed evidence was presented, and virtually none of the “Fake News” followed it and reported it… including Fox News. The only TV news that did so… was One America News Network – which did an excellent job of reporting all of the evidence.
Anyone who watched every hearing before each of the State Legislatures in the Swing States saw the thousands of pages of evidence presented by the forensic auditors, the IT specialists, the 100’s of witnesses (sworn testimony), the CCT cameras, etc., etc. There was no one who came forward to refute all of that evidence. This evidence was not presented by Giuliani, or Powell – and – none of the defamation suits referenced are going anywhere, because the evidence that the experts presented was overwhelming (just as presented in each of the documentary movies), and because many of the whistle-blowers from the voting machine companies have come forward to admit the charges made by the witnesses.
And… almost no court (state or federal) permitted the many cases that were filed to be heard, or permitted the evidence to be submitted and considered. There were no courts that considered and ruled on the evidence, or the merits of those cases – with the exception of one or two in Michigan, and maybe Wisconsin, which ruled on behalf of the plaintiffs that there had been interference with the election in those counties or precincts. The only court that did not rule on behalf of the plaintiff, that permitted the evidence to be submitted was in Maricopa County in AZ – which ignored the evidence that was admitted and corroborated by multiple parties – and that decision is now being appealed.
So… you may continue the delusion that there was no evidence of election fraud – but – that clearly is a myth that is being perpetrated by the ignorant and uniformed!
Correct. In reality, we have not had legitimate government in a generation or more. It took Donald Trump to make it known.
The word guarantee is used only once in our Constitution. The authors were very careful of their words, so what was so important that the legitimacy of the contract hinged upon delivery of that guarantee? Our elections. The guarantee assures us that the Federal government will make sure we have “a Republican form of government.” That means fair elections. That guarantee can NEVER be met without proof - that burden of proof lying on the States, not We the People, to produce - proof which does not exist in more than half of our States because their election laws either do not require it, or as in 2020 ignored their election laws and thus never bothered to collect nor verify it.
In other words, you did really well at dog and pony shows.
Gosh, that's surprising.
Fox News reporter Lucas Tomlinson told Bret Baier, Fox's chief political correspondent, that "these conspiracy theories" were "dangerously insane." In a deposition, Fox News host Sean Hannity recalled his reaction to the "whole narrative that Sidney was pushing": "I did not believe it for one second." Tucker Carlson was similarly dismissive. "Sidney Powell is lying," he told his producer on November 16.
Yet the Trump Cultists who post here on H&R still push this "election fraud" bullshit.
^ The nambla cultist has spoken.
Which one?
Ghatanathoah and sqrlsy have also posted above...
As the Reason comment section's leading nonpartisan enforcer of the Brain Damage Victims Don't Belong in the US Senate rule, this should make you absolutely furious.
A senior aide says it’s been difficult to distinguish the stroke from the depression – saying it’s hard to tell at times if Fetterman is “not hearing you, or is he sort of crippled by his depression and social anxiety.”
Such a pathetic joke this piece of damaged goods is disgracing The World's Greatest Deliberative Body. Right?
Yeah, he should resign if he is as ill as it appears.
No kidding.
No harm done. We still have 99 other incompetents in the Senate.
Now you sound like an optimist.
"No harm done"
But somehow a black guy that didn't win in Georgia is Buttplug's #1 threat to democracy.
So he’s not just a pedophile, but he’s a racist pedophile? Nah, I don’t believe that for a second.
He’d wouldn’t even blink if he had the opportunity to fuck a little black boy.
There's a shit ton of damage done to him personally when he wasn't allowed to properly recover from the stroke with prescribed rest.
You don't care about him, obviously, but a lot of people pretend that they do.
But implicit in your tone is something like “if voters had known about Fetterman’s health problems they would have elected Oz”.
Well, no. Voters took one look at Fatass Donnie’s hand-picked nutcase and said “Let’s go with the Democrat”. Same with many others Fatass picked off his sticky floor.
If you say "they voted FOR Fetterman" you give him too much credit.
But implicit in your tone is something like “if voters had known about Fetterman’s health problems they would have elected Oz”.
Your reading comprehension sucks.
Here's me the day I dropped character just before the midterms: Of the close Senate races, the one where a GOP victory would most surprise me is Pennsylvania. Yup, I honestly expect the stroke victim to win.
I called Fetterman "the stroke victim." And I don't live in PA so I wasn't following that election especially closely. His stroke was common knowledge before the election and I correctly predicted he'd win anyway.
The point of bringing up (white Democrat) Fetterman's obvious deficiency is it's the perfect experiment to prove your obsession with Walker never had anything to do with his alleged brain damage. You're a stereotypical white Southern good ol' boy who thinks "black bodies" should do what you say. Just in your case that means supporting Democrats. THAT is why you still can't shut up about Walker. He dared to be ungrateful for everything your party does for "people like him."
Don't be ridiculous. Herschel is just embarrassing for Georgia babbling like the moron he is.
Take your victory with your accurate election predictions. You get a medal.
"Herschel is just embarrassing for Georgia"
Uppity negroes.
You aren’t embarrassed by senator Frankenstein though.
Everybody knew that Fetterman had a stroke. That wasn't what the gaslighting campaign was about. The gaslighting campaign insisted that he was not cognitively impaired by it.
Dr. Mehmet Oz is a ‘nutcase’? Oz may be a number of things but he is pretty far from a ‘nutcase’.
But you’re still a faggot pedophile.
Shrike Likes Tikes
Link to child porn once, and people think you’re a pedophile.
How rude!
You can build a hundred bridges, but you suck one cock . . .
Especially when it belongs to a small boy.
Are you a Biologist?
What if the boy identifies as an adult? Imagine how traumatizing it would be for a man to be denied access to sex just because he's a biological child.
Lurch's mongoloid stroke didn't create his depression. He was already that way. When you have clear neanderthal genes, like Fetterman, that are dominant in your lineage, it's hard to overcome the overarching mental desire to be a happy person. Why? Well, when you couple his radical Marxist ideology with his clear lack of emotional intelligence, a clear lack of actual intelligence, and his corrosive mental state, the stroke was just a foregone conclusion.
But be sure to check in next time, when he will become unfit to serve in his official duties and that human clusterfuck of a Pennsylvania governor appoints Fetterman's wife to take over.
I wonder when senate seats become transferable property.
Had to check if this was written by Misek...
Well, it's not surprising he won, when the Repubs nominated an unqualified distinguished heart surgeon and beloved television personality with first rate communications skills. What were they thinking?
But a carpetbagger too. Had he been a long time PA resident, he would have won.
Yea, that would've totes kept Philly from going 110% for Fetterman...
That’s just you and your lying eyes pointing to clear election fraud that totally isn’t happening, unlike the Russia collusion Sullum jizzed his pants over for years.
At least Fetterman has an excuse for acting crazy. What's the excuse for the other 99 Senators?
My hump improves daily.
Sidney Powell might not have been the best spokesperson to push for an election integrity investigation.
Prove there was no election fraud. There was certainly ample opportunity for fraud in many districts - that should be the standard for accepting or rejecting ballots.
Are you joking? Prove a negative, or your ballots get tossed out?
Why bother with the election...
Are you gay?
You come across very gay.
Good grief you guys are STILL traumatized by him arent you??
You think a knee-jerk trauma response is the best explanation for why they would publish a story about a man who is currently running in an election for President who repeatedly made false accusations that the last presidential election he ran in was a fraud?
If Trump loses in 2024 and they publish a story like this in 2025, that might be one thing. But he's still running in an election, so his behavior during elections is still generally relevant.
Dear god are you butthurt.
I wish you more trauma in 24.
If Trump loses in 2024 they will publish a story like this in 2025.
FTFY
The story is actually about a development in an ongoing lawsuit against Fox, not Trump.
Shhhh!
"who repeatedly made false accusations that the last presidential election he ran in was a fraud?"
How do you know they were false accusations? Was there an actual audit? Did any court open an investigation or actually hear evidence?
Since November 6, 2020 the exact same people who perpetrated the Trump Russia hoax, who after Trump's win objected to certifying the election results in 9 states, who boycotted or rioted at his inauguration, and who spent four years screaming "Russia stole the election" and "#NotMyPresident, suddenly told us that the US just experienced the most Free & Fair election ever, and if you disagree we'll kick you off the internet and call you an insurrectionist or a terrorist.
And if you protest about it on public property, you'll be locked up for a year without trial, forced to sign a loyalty oath, and barred from social media, and a supposedly pro-liberty website won't even report on you.
The Reason staff won't touch a story about the Jan 6 arrestees for the same reason (not a pun) that grade school children will not talk to the kid who has "cooties". They are afraid of being "contaminated" and then the other kids won't play with them, the other kids being the progressive intelligentsia.
5th graders grow out of it, Reason staffers may not.
Reason staffers also think the J6 protesters deserve it, and revel in their suffering.
They do deserve it.
3-10 year sentences for storming into the Capitol building and trying to prevent the certification of the presidential election. Sounds about right.
There’s copious video evidence, so it’s not like there’s doubt about whether they are guilty. What exactly are you complaining about? Your rather we gave them a medal?
More than a dozen court cases actually completed and verified illegal election changes.
Both arizona and Georgia verified thousands of double voters, but chose not to proceed with any charges.
They refuse to look at any of the laughable signature matching.
But no fraud.
American exceptionalism precludes the existence of voter
fraud in America. It’s literally impossible to comit fraud in America.
No widespread corruption.
No widespread America…
President Biden is planning to run again in 2024. But that didn't stop him from lobbying to change the Democrat primary calendar to his benefit.
Those that live in glass houses…balanța.
Look Reason, we already KNOW YOU ARE DEMOCRAT PARTY OPERATIVES I.E. LITERAL NAZIS.
Stop trying to convince us!
Fox tried walking that corporate media tightrope of not wanting to be completely hacky, but also not wanting to upset their base viewers by telling them the truth about stolen election claims.
"The brief, which includes redactions that Fox requested, argues that the company's executives were nervous about alienating Trump and losing his supporters to right-wing competitors such as Newsmax and One America News Network. To support that argument, Dominion cites an email that News Corporation Executive Chairman Rupert Murdoch sent to Fox News CEO Suzanne Scott two weeks after the election."
This is absolute pure conjecture on the part of the skeevy buttfuckers over at Dominion and their lawyers. This opinion alone is worthy of throwing this suit out along with them on their faces.
It might be conjecture on their part, but it’s completely true.
Fox has what, around 4 million viewers maximum. Losing even a small portion of that cuts big time into revenue. And many right leaning outlets and commentators immediately started shilling for OANN and Newsmax the instant it looked like Fox was becoming critical of Trump’s claims. I mean, there was a point where viewership for both networks doubled almost overnight because of it.
In the corporate media world, you have to keep ahold of a dwindling amount of viewers and readers. To do so, you have to tell them what they want to hear, even if it’s not the truth.
Boy, that sure sounds like dispassionate, unbiased assessment to me!
I'll defer to your expertise. I don't think you've ever posted something dispassionate or unbiased in the entire time you've worked these comments, so you would know.
Dominion isn't biased?
Anonymous Mourner Returns To Lay Hydrocodone Tablet At Rush Limbaugh’s Grave
https://www.theonion.com/anonymous-mourner-returns-to-lay-hydrocodone-tablet-at-1850129514
Well, Peanuts, it has been two years since serial liar and Jerry Falwell fellow contender for worst piece of shit in the world has kicked the bucket. (Louis Farrakhan is in that mix too).
Good riddance, trash.
Ah, the compassion, caring, and humanity from those on the left. It will never not amaze me how much you all are the antithesis of what you demand.
I'm not on "the left".
I prefer "equal opportunity hater".
Oh, I keep forgetting that you claim not to be on the left. My bad.
I have said many times that from a policy-only perspective Bernie Sanders is far worse than Fatass Donnie.
But Bernie Sanders is not important. NONE of his fucking legislation has ever passed.
Democrats are not even very fond of the guy since he keeps losing in the primaries.
Yeah, he “lost”.
I just go with your constant attacks on the right, your user name, and the fact that you needed to bring up Rush Limbaugh to bash the man in an article that has nothing to do with him.
Well, it IS the two year anniversary.
98% of the posts here bash Democrats. Okay?
So, purely from a libertarian perspective I bash conservatives. Where is the problem?
I didn’t say there was a problem I just explained your penchant for bashing the right, I would include your lack of bashing the left, your name, and the fact that you bash a conservative on the anniversary of his death when the article has nothing to do with that.
So basically, you are a left leaning “libertarian” as far as all evidence shows.
There’s nothing wrong with that, just goes back to my initial statement how people on the left tend to behave exactly like that which they despise. It’s just ironic.
Fair enough. "Liberaltarian" works. OBL knew it best.
You know that it has been going on forever - the Paleo vs the Cosmo.
I started out as a pro-drug, pro-choice, pro-gay marriage, pro-prostitution anti-blue law capitalist.
Naturally Paleos don't like most of that description.
I don’t know what Paleo vs Cosmo means. I assume it’s your classification that people who disagree with you some sort of dinosaurs, whereas people who agree with you are gloriously cosmopolitan.
Here, in a gesture of good will - is a link to the Wayback Machine and the remnants of the Liberty Forum - where I got my start.. the first big libertarian site.
It was nuts - and great for arguments Paleo vs Cosmo.
Ron Paul was a lightning rod. But it is now gone....
http://web.archive.org/web/20080605195117/http://www.libertyforum.org/wwwthreads.php?Cat=
I still don't know what Paleo vs. Cosmo means, though.
"Fair enough. “Liberaltarian” works."
Except that you're not liberal or libertarian, you're a cheap little fascist whose recently developed a Neocon fetish. Establishmentarian corporatist might be the best description.
You’re a pro pedophile pedophile.
ML, he always had the Neocon fetish, just so long as they wore the blue lapels on their uniforms.
Being a pedophile isn’t Re a leftist piece of shit, and a child rapist.
Yes, there's all that "evidence" no one currently on this forum will admit to having personally viewed...
Shrike isn’t too bright.
You’re a leftist. And you fuck children.
You’re a fascist. And you fuck chickens.
I see the shit eater has jumped in. I wonder what it said?
Hopefully it commits suicide, and soon.
Conservaturds making friends, gathering votes, and influencing people by... PEDDLING KOOL-AID AND SUICIDE!!! How's it workin' for ya, servant of the Evil One?
EvilBahnFuhrer, drinking EvilBahnFuhrer Kool-Aid in a spiraling vortex of darkness, cannot or will not see the Light… It’s a VERY sad song! Kinda like this…
He’s a real Kool-Aid Man,
Sitting in his Kool-Aid Land,
Playing with his Kool-Aid Gland,
His Hero is Jimmy Jones,
https://www.britannica.com/biography/Jim-Jones
Loves death and the dying moans,
Then he likes to munch their bones!
Has no thoughts that help the people,
He wants to turn them all to sheeple!
On the sheeple, his Master would feast,
Master? A disaster! Just the nastiest Beast!
Kool-Aid man, please listen,
You don’t know, what you’re missin’,
Kool-Aid man, better thoughts are at hand,
The Beast, to LEAVE, you must COMMAND!
A helpful book is to be found here: M. Scott Peck, Glimpses of the Devil
https://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/1439167265/reasonmagazinea-20/
Hey EvilBahnFuhrer …
If EVERYONE who makes you look bad, by being smarter and better-looking than you, killed themselves, per your wishes, then there would be NO ONE left!
Who would feed you? Who’s tits would you suck at, to make a living? WHO would change your perpetually-smelly DIAPERS?!!?
You’d better come up with a better plan, Stan!
Did you know that Your Hero Rash Limburger called for KILLING drug pushers and drug abusers, before He got hooked on pain pills?
Where did I say he's my hero? I mean, I didn't even like the guy. But I also don't sink to disgusting and depraved levels of cheering someone's death simply because I didn't like their radio show.
Remember who you’re talking to.
I know. I usually have him muted, but I really wanted to see if he would answer me. My assumption was that he wouldn't. And of course, he didn't.
Somehow I think Sidney Powell could run intellectual rings around all of the hosts and producers at FoxNews, as well as the writers at REASON.
What is this? Another REASON article entirely sourced from one side's court filing? Like when we hear what the attorney of the "unarmed" citizen files, and nothing of the other side?
There is massive circumstantial evidence that the 2020 election was far from "free and fair".
A lot of what has been "rejected by the courts" was never seriously listened to by them. The Supreme Court sent a clear message, when it refused to rule on Pennsylvania's changing of election regulations, by other than the legislature, that they wanted to stay out of election matters, which ushered in a free-for-all, that lower courts didn't want to touch.
Among some of the circumstantial evidence, immediately noticeable was:
Trump winning 18 of 19 bellwether districts, as did 0bama.
Trump winning Florida, Ohio and Iowa, as did 0bama
The ridiculous idea that basement campaigning Biden got 11.9 million more votes than 0bama ever did.
And, let's not forget the censoring of the Hunter Biden laptop, that enough Biden voters said would have had them change their votes, to have altered the election results.
And the Time magazine article detaining "a well-funded cabal of powerful people, ranging across industries and ideologies, working together behind the scenes to influence perceptions, change rules and laws, steer media coverage and control the flow of information." https://time.com/5936036/secret-2020-election-campaign/
I think even a respectable number of democrats have stated they don't think the election was free and fair.
Um, even Sidney Powell argued in court filings that no reasonable person would have believed her claims.
Do you mean when this happened?In their filing on her behalf, Powell’s attorneys use a familiar defense to defamation lawsuits, which is that statements of opinion are generally protected by the First Amendment.
“[N]o reasonable person would conclude that the statements [about Dominion] were truly statements of fact,” they argued. So, no, she didn’t say what you did. She said it was her opinion. Quite the difference.
Yes, she claimed in her filing that she was stating her opinion and that no reasonable person would have believed her.
I think you're trying to split hairs, but there are not hairs to split.
It’s what lawyers do.
Yes, they assert the defenses that their clients claim. And in this case they asserted the defense for Powell that no reasonable person would have believed her. Sorry, when you plead in court that what you were saying was all bullshit. It’s a hard position to take that they aren’t claiming that what they said was all bullshit.
Ok, genius.
Where is the legal defense against slander/libel that saying what you said was bullshit?
If anything, such an admission would be damning.
It was her opinion, anything said in a response brief other than that would be malpractice on the part of her lawyers.
I guess I’ll explain for the slow of learning.
Opinions are protected, claiming facts that are false is not protected. To defend against the slander/libel, she had to explain that either what she was saying was the truth, as truth is the best defense to slander/libel, or that what she said was opinion, opinion that was not based on facts, opinion that was so wild that no reasonable person would have believed what she was saying was supported by facts.
Again, I know you are trying to split hairs because you got caught off guard when you asked for proof that wasn’t tied to what you believe to be intellectual inferiors to Ms. Powell and you were then provided Ms. Powell’s own assertions. But it’s time to let it go.
"...claiming facts that are false is not protected."
Good job Inquisitive Squirrel!!! THIS cuts through MUCH bullshit! (Especially in court.)
Do you mean “believed they were plausible”, or “believed her claims were fact solely on her word”? Which are not the same thing.
https://reason.com/2022/02/11/sidney-powell-disowns-her-kraken-saying-she-is-not-responsible-for-her-phony-story-of-a-stolen-election/ (Yet another Powell article)
https://reason.com/2021/03/23/sidney-powell-says-shes-not-guilty-of-defamation-because-no-reasonable-person-would-have-believed-her-outlandish-election-conspiracy-theory/
Sidney Powell Says She’s Not Guilty of Defamation Because ‘No Reasonable Person’ Would Have Believed Her ‘Outlandish’ Election Conspiracy Theory
Which particular lies are you wanting to hear and believe today, hyper-partisan Wonder Child?
Don't usually read your screeds, but look at what was said.
It was that no reasonable person could believe her claims were stated as facts, but that they were her opinion.
Unreasonable people thought it was stated as a fact.
Got a mirror?
But she submitted her obvious lies IN COURT as the sworn-to TRUTH! What excuses do you (or anyone else) have for THAT?
HOW MUCH of a joke do you want our courts to be turned into? Do YOU want to be dragooned as a juror, and spend your barely-paid-for hours, wading through endless LIES? Lies submitted by lying lawyers who hope to TRICK you into playing the FOOL?
Bush v. Gore was the poison pill that kept SCOTUS from dipping its toes into this. They did not want a repeat of a long drawn-out constitutional crisis. Nevermind the fact that Bush won Florida with 537 votes using Gore's lawyer's own rules. Chads and all, hanging or otherwise.
And fl has been solidly red since they kicked out the activists on the election board
Huh? SIdney Powell's own lawyers characterized her stolen election theories as not being true.
Did you know that MAGA now stands for "Making Attorneys Get Attorneys"?
https://www.serioustrouble.show/p/making-attorneys-get-attorneys#details
Good one.
Except they didn't, but please keep posting outdated Salon links to "prove" otherwise.
https://reason.com/2022/02/11/sidney-powell-disowns-her-kraken-saying-she-is-not-responsible-for-her-phony-story-of-a-stolen-election/ (Yet another Powell article)
https://reason.com/2021/03/23/sidney-powell-says-shes-not-guilty-of-defamation-because-no-reasonable-person-would-have-believed-her-outlandish-election-conspiracy-theory/
Sidney Powell Says She’s Not Guilty of Defamation Because ‘No Reasonable Person’ Would Have Believed Her ‘Outlandish’ Election Conspiracy Theory
Which particular lies are you wanting to hear and believe today, hyper-partisan Wonder Child?
Yes. Those were were based on phony information too. Look at the dates you fucking idiot.
Do you ever link to something that wasn't already refuted by later events?
SQRLSY is almost as bad as shrike when posting self owns.
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/sidney-powell-dominion-defamation-lawsuit-voter-fraud/
From there, “But ‘no reasonable person would conclude that the statements were truly statements of fact,’ Powell says in her motion to dismiss the lawsuit.” Powell is a LAWYER, and it is ***HER*** MOTION to dismiss! Admitted to court, this motion was!!! Hello?!?! WHO are You blaming for YOUR lies?!?!? If You don’t believe lies, then do NOT submit them willingly, willfully, under YOUR name! WHY is this so hard? But You’re lying about Your lies, which You clearly lied about, but The Evil One MADE You lie, and then the Evil One lied about having the lawyer lie about Your lies, when You told the lawyer about maybe telling some BETTER lies instead… Wait! Wouldn’t it be better to start out by NOT lying in the first place?!?!
But… But we ALL need to destinkmatize Mammary-Necrophilia-Fuhrer for all of HER lies, ’cause She can’t help it! She’s got EPDO = Evil Personality Disorder-Odor!
Also, readers, please forgive Mammary-Necrophilia-Fuhrer for "Her" written lies above, 'cause SHE didn't write them; the Evil One MADE Her write them! Mammary-Necrophilia-Fuhrer is currently trying to make the Evil One take these words BACK!!!
(Next on the Hit Parade: If Mammary-Necrophilia-Fuhrer doesn't manage to bend the Evil One to Her Will, She will tell the Evil One that It should commit suicide, and then Mammary-Necrophilia-Fuhrer will threaten to hold Her Breath till the Evil One obeys!!!)
Marxism is infinitely worse than any of Trump's stupidities.
Look at your recent "980 signatures" or whatever it was piece on the New York Times. Not a single mention of how bad Marxism is.
The most polite interpretation is that you take Marxism==Bad as being so well known that you don't need to mention it ever again. But I'm really tired of Marxists getting a wave-off so often.
And then there's the pedophiles and child gender mutilation surgery clique. I don't care what they do as an adult. But before puberty, because the woke teacher has a pedo hardon?
Great article, Mike. I appreciate your work, I’m now creating over 153,567 excuses of “Look over there and see what YOUR heroes, the Lizard People and Idi Amin did, with the rights of RIGHTEOUS humanoids, ass opposed to the so-called 'rights' of the 'what-gender-am-I' confused sub-humans?!?!?" ... Now can we get back on track and worshit, instead of the 'what-gender-am-I' confused sub-humans, our PROPER Overlards, which is the Amphibian People? PLEASE??!?
But I DO firmly agree with you, all about the below!
Yes indeed, I can NOT understand HOW it is, that pro-reason, pro-freedom, pro-free-markets Reason-dot-com is all, TOTALLY on board with the Demon-Craps and the Lizard People, in advocating installing MIND CONTROL DEVICES into all of us!!!
How DARE they?!?! Ye TRUE Faithful Adherents to the One True Party of the Trumptatorshit, git ye ALL, right NOW, foursquare into the backing of the pro-freedom, Patriotic Amphibian People, as directed by the One True TrumpfenFuhrer, and His Most Devout Disciple, Pepe the (Amphibian Person) Frickin’-Frog!
Let me give you a VERY prominent Amphibian Person with the CORRECT thoughts and attitudes! I give you Pepe the Amphibian Person, stolen-IP-4Chan-Frog! Racist frog, NAZI frog, yaya-yada!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pepe_the_Frog
Of course Sqrlsy was going to repeat Hillary's half-decade old accusation about frogposting.
He may do nothing but regurgitate outdated DNC propaganda, but don't you dare call him a Democrat.
The only Squirrely comments I read are the short ones without ALL CAPS sprinkled all over, and not many of them either, which is to say, less than 1% probably.
If you're a Marxist of any kind, frankly, you're a professionally trained moron and should never be taken seriously about anything.
Methadras Aszlosis, I agree with you 100% on that... Now how about the MANY-MANY right-wing wrong-nut Marxists who post here on a regular basis, who oppose Section 230? Who want to have Government Almighty (rather than private property owners) conduct and-or supervise the moderation of privately owned web sites? What Do you (as an opponent of Marxism) think about the whining crybabies who want Government Almighty to PROTECT them from the EVIL property owners who TOOK DOWN MY POST!!!! WAAAAA!!!!
Marxism is infinitely worse than any of Trump’s stupidities.
Like instituting a national eviction moratorium?
Yes.
Quoting "top election infrastructure officials," Heinrich noted that "there is no evidence that any voting system deleted or lost votes, changed votes, or was in any way compromised."
I think the reason they were upset was that Heinrich was quoting "Top election officials," and Fox viewers are mistrustful of nameless, faceless bureaucrats being quoted as sources. Using them as "factcheckers" is a bigger issue than what Tucker Carlson did, which was say, "Sidney Powell has failed to show a single shred of evidence despite our polite requests. It got to the point where she got angry and told us to stop contacting her."
Dominion might have a case against a couple of individuals here, but it's going to depend on how guarded their language in these shows and interviews. I don't know if they have a case against the whole of Fox News.
Sidney Powell was actually a good lawyer who had exposed some pretty nasty prosecutorial misconduct. After the 2020 election I was inclined to let her make her case especially in an environment where outfits like Reason were shrieking "MOST FAIREST ELECTION EVER". I suspect a lot of people at Fox felt the same way. But weeks went by and she never produced the smoking gun. Ultimately Fox and Trump cut her loose. And I as well. That doesn't convince me that voting machines can't be manipulated or that there wasn't fraud in the 2020 election. Only that Powell didn't have the proof.
"Only that Powell didn’t have the proof."
HERE is the fix for that!
“Under Der TrumpfenFuher, the “R” party will NOT rest until it is the ONLY party!”
Why is it?
If you need proof of what I say, read https://reason.com/2020/12/20/desperate-to-stop-biden-from-taking-office-trump-suggests-military-intervention-voting-machine-seizures-and-appointing-sidney-powell-to-investigate-her-own-fraud-claims/ Desperate To Stop Biden From Taking Office, Trump Suggests Military Intervention, Voting Machine Seizures, and Appointing Sidney Powell To Investigate Her Own Fraud Claims
Trump flunkies want to use martial law to hold new elections in swing states that didn’t vote Trump. Use the military to force a do-over where the people didn’t vote for Trump like they were supposed to. Give them a second bite at the apple.
And there will be endless do-overs till these wayward slobs do things the RIGHT way, and vote for Der TrumpfenFuhrer!
Those states who voted for Der TrumpfenFuhrer? Texas, for instance? And now that time has gone by, and millions of Texans have seen yet MORE of the “true stripes” of the Trumptatorshit… And they voted for Trump, but are SOOOO disgusted by now, they want to vote differently by now… Do THEY get a do-over?
Let’s selectively re-play this game till the Trumptatorshit lasts forever!
Beyond that, you can find her claims about Dominion to be quite dubious or on shaky ground while still finding many things about the election troubling. I think that's another issue Fox News had, and why they were complaining about her-she was reaching for some insanely tenuous, even outlandish claims, and it was overshadowing more significant concerns about the integrity of the ballots.
The big concern in 2020 wasn't the actual voting machines, it was the processing of ballots through the mail. There were a few more interesting irregularities like nursing homes that had 100% voter participation, or sketchy videos of Fulton County election officials seemingly kicking out the poll-watchers and then resuming counting ballots. Or the provable fact that election procedures to allow drop-boxes were changed in violation of existing law, with courts in multiple states making that finding.
FoxNews is, and has been, part of the cabal.
-FoxNews promoted covid panic mongering and fraud with running "covid infections and deaths" on screen 24/7
-FoxNews promoted George Floyd systemic racism narratives
-FoxNews promoted Russian collusion allegations as credible (and Russia as #1 world boogeyman)
-FoxNews promoted hostilities with Syria, regime change, and white helmet hoaxes
-FoxNews promoted Blasey-Ford's ridiculous allegations
FoxNews is the epitome of controlled "opposition". They promote the same narratives using the same framing as the rest of the msm/regime.
And the circle closes in, just a little bit more...
You don't need to hack the vote counting machines if you harvest the ballots and intentionally waive or reduce the signature matching requirements on the envelopes, then throw them out before the audit. There's nothing left to count but the presumed valid votes.
Right, and I think that's part of why Fox News was calling Sidney Powell insane-they believed there was a problem with the election but the mechanism she was describing was bad for the narrative. They wanted to cover the lawsuit and wanted credible claims to be advanced but she was stuck on the idea that the machines were hacked or maliciously programmed.
They absolutely did not want credible claims advanced.
FoxNews called AZ with like 10% reported.
They were all in on the fix.
I knew it!
It was a Faux Flag operation.
This. Reason is doing some serious journalistic malpractice hear. Their headline calls it "Trump's stolen election fantasy" when it is far-more accurately "Sidney Powell's stolen election fantasy." They also seem to be conflating the most outlandish claims with the entirety of the Trump election fraud argument. To summarize the entirety of the claims by Trump and his supporters would be to describe a complex mix of plausible and completely moronic claims.
Heinrich's a pretty good reporter, good enough not to use euphemisms like "top officials" in place of the more accurate "anonymous sources". If the source won't come forward, whatever they say is bullshit.
Do you know who else has a stolen election fantasy?
https://twitter.com/tribelaw/status/1618422691505242113
I remodelled $700 per day exploitation my mobile partly time. I recently got my fifth bank check of $19632 and every one i used to be doing is to repeat and paste work online. This home work makes Pine Tree State able to generate more money daily simply straightforward to try and do work and regular financial gain from this are simply superb.
Here what i’m doing. strive currently..................>>> http://www.jobsrevenue.com
This article comes off a bit like today's earlier article where it said "bowf sidez" see corporate political advocacy as a no-win situation, but then admits that Democrats by significant margins are the ones that want political advocacy.
So what I get from this article is that while Fox News is, by the measure of its bias, predisposed to favor conservatives, the GOP and Trump narratives, but provided mild skepticism at most, or weak-tea promotion at best.
The New York Times, which *checks notes* ChatGPT and GDI tells us is a trusted, unbiased news source, literally… LITERALLY “built it’s newsroom around Russia Collusion”.
Look, I have no love for Fox News… I don’t watch it any more or less than I read the New York Times. But if there’s one thing I can’t stand from any news network, it’s when they piss down your back and blame it on Fox News , when Fox News wasn’t even in the room.
Bret Baird and Jillian Turner are good straight reporters, better than anything on CNN or MSNBC. The rest of Fox plays to their audience, much like MSNBC plays to theirs. Those are opinion/entertainment shows not news shows.
I was told repeatedly in no uncertain terms that Russia stole the election from us in 2016.
I believe you can get confirmation of that to this day from the candidate who lost that election.
https://twitter.com/RNCResearch/status/1626658911322312705
NEW VIDEO: 24 minutes of Democrats denying election results.
Nobody lost their minds over this. Nobody called for silencing these people. nobody cried and screamed about "muh Democracy". Paypal didnt cancel these people's accounts. Youtube didnt delete their interviews. Nobody tried to get them arrested. no NYT columnists called for their followers to be ostracized from polite society.
I include myself. I did not give a shit that these people "denied" the election results and I dont give a shit if Trump does either.
Though people did call them "Fake News," and questioned whether they might have a civil liability for advancing false claims.
Hey, if it screeds it leads.
You voted for it. Repeatedly, hard, and with gusto. Now you wonder "wha happa?!!"
Reason's not the only place on the web with commenters who push back with... um, 'social pressure'.
Isn't calling someone's complaint "a fantasy" assuming the conclusion? Aren't journalists supposed to investigate? Could there be some serious grounds for suspecting foul play? Is there no there there, or is it just unprovable? How many states changed the rules in the election year of 2020, due to COVID? How many of them followed their own rules for changing the rules? How many of them loosened their standards for verifying votes?
And why were Pennsylvania's mail-in votes so out of whack with Pennsylvania's in-person votes, when other states at least had some correlation? And how did all the networks know on election night that Pennsylvania's mail-in vote (in a 50-50 state) split would match California's (a 65-35 state)? If you were an international observer of the election, wouldn't you at least be curious?
The thing is that the lawsuit isn't about those claims. It's specifically about Fox News promoting her claims that Dominion machines were intentionally designed to electronically change or hack the vote count. That's why it's Dominion bringing this lawsuit. The question is whether Fox did their due diligence in helping her promote those claims without any evidence despite the fact they were internally dubious or considered them false.
So... Dominion released their code?
Someone looked at the machines shortly after the election and verified how they were programmed?
It’s on the person making the claim to provide evidence and she never has.
So "we've investigated ourselves and found no wrongdoing" is now strong enough evidence to prosecute an accuser over?
Better fine her a billion dollars.
For justice.
There's a difference between a prosecution and a lawsuit. If you say "We've found evidence," and you have no evidence, it doesn't matter if the underlying claim is true, you're still not being truthful. And it's not on the defendant to plaintiff to prove that the claim is false, it's on the defendant to present that they did have evidence and weren't lying about having evidence.
If you want to hold people accountable, and find the proper balance between free speech and defamation, you have to hold consistent standards.
I'm sure preventing all investigation then assuming claims requiring investigation are false to the point of defamation will hold everyone accountable...
Is someone stopping you from "investigating"?
Off you go...
I remodelled $700 per day exploitation my mobile partly time. I recently got my fifth bank check of $19632 and every one i used to be doing is to repeat and paste work online. This home work makes Pine Tree State able to generate more money daily simply straightforward to try and do work and regular financial gain from this are simply superb.
Here what i’m doing. strive currently………………>>> http://www.jobsrevenue.com
By the way... did we ever get any looks at those Dominion (what's in a name anyway?) machines?
Did we ever get their code?
Or are we just assuming *DOMINION* is an honest actor, just like the rest of corporate America and government and NGOs?
https://twitter.com/AuronMacintyre/status/1626602715143872514?t=I-m-xn5bFBSLkjSPJfcJlg&s=19
The right lacks a network of parallel sense-making institutions to help process events
In an oligarchy based on narrative control alternative institutions like this are a direct threat to the ruling elite which is why they’re functionally banned 1/
Any attempt by the right to have basic discussions on issues like covid or even gender identity must be heavily coded to avoid being banned off of platforms, any research that might counter the prevailing narrative will destroy the career of the researcher 2/
Academics, entertainers, media figures and anyone else who weaves our culture narrative must at all time point their conclusions in the direction of progressive power or face immediate destruction
Destruction that is just as often delivered by conservatives as it is liberals 3/
It’s not that the right can’t form a counter narrative, it’s that it is actively denied the tools to do so
If, for instance, data is the only acceptable argument how do you acquire opposing data when heterodox research is banned? 4/
This means that the right can’t sort conspiracy from fact because there is no alternative legitimating mechanism is allowed to emerge
Though you’ll notice that RW “conspiracy theories” have a shockingly good batting average/5
When all your sense-making institution are thoroughly corrupted, betting against them indiscriminately is actually a pretty good strategy, but it isn't a good long term way to have your side arrive at the truth reliably /6
Alex Jones isn't prophet, he just says the opposite of what the insanely corrupt oligarchy does, and that gives him a shockingly good batting average, though when it fails, it fails spectacularly /7
The progressive oligarchy is a network of prestige, relying on each node to grant legitimacy to each other organization in the network /8
The ruling elite are now so corrupt that they are burning legitimacy for cheap paydays and the opportunity to flex on their enemies, which naturally brings about instability /9
The right must help to accelerate the destruction of this credibility, eroding the prestige of these institutions at every opportunity
It also needs leaders who will create space for the right to generate alternative intuitions to fill the void /10
The guy who bragged about having "the most inclusive and effective vote fraud team in American political history" and those running him are totes ethical...
https://twitter.com/tomselliott/status/1626374667295510528?t=-v8r8lmWj75K8r0UYBw4xw&s=19
Biden on lynching: "White families gathered to celebrate the spectacle, taking pictures of the bodies ... Some people still want to do that"
[Video]
And yet we haven’t had a lynching in 42 years.
Lynching is premeditated murder punishable by death, but it wasn't a hate crime so people were lynched daily. But making lynching a hate crime, that will freeze those murderers in their tracks. Nothing is more terrifying than being accused of "hate".
Really does Biden think the people in this country are cruel enough to force someone to sit and watch eraser head, Mulholland Dr, elephant man, and blue valve all in a row?
To be fair, that probably remains true in Biden's social circles, being as they are filled with psychopaths.
Any TV viewer or newspaper reader listening to Sydney Powell in 2020 had ample reason to question not only her judgment, but her sanity.
Any news reporter -- even small-j journalists -- is free to report what she is saying and to withhold that opinion. The concept of malice is essential to Freedom of the Press.
Unless someone can now produce actual evidence of malice, journalists remain free to acknowledge both sides of any issue.
What can be seen in this story is the power of the mob. We have known for years that many, not all, Republicans will not criticize the former President fearing the wrath of his followers. Now we are learning that those followers can influence a major media outlet and bend their coverage to the will of Trump.
I watch Fox, news programs, not opinion shows, to get their perspective on stories. I expect those to reflect a different point of view. Here we have not only a different point of view but outright deceit. Many reporters have left Fox in the last few years, and this give an idea of why that has happened.
“More censorship required”
In the case of Faux News, the censorshit was conducted by Trumpist viewers, ultimately. "Thou Shalt Tell Us Only That Which We Want To Hear." And Faux News pandered to them, cravenly!
No more transparency required.
People like you love the power of the mob... when it brings your communist utopia nearer.
When the mob has "false consciousness", you demand totalitarian control.
Now discuss whether Jeff Bezos actually believes what the Washington Post prints.
Good point.
Is he being sued for defamation by someone?
Dominion has to meet the "actual malice" test
They would also have to prove actual damages. Hurt feelings aren't actionable in a case like this.
The actual damages will not be real hard because of the damage to their brand. This is a company that makes vote counting devices. Do you think any state controlled by Republican will buy their product? If their product was lower prices and better, do you think they would get their bid selected? This is a lot more than hurt feelings.
Do you think any state controlled by Republican will buy their product?
Yes. Neither party wants honest elections.
Their only customers are governments, who supposedly pick software based on rational, objective criteria and aren't swayed by "reputation".
No state should pick closed source, proprietary software for any of their elections, no matter what the reputation of the company. The integrity of our elections should not depend on having to trust the integrity of small software companies.
You're assuming that state bureaucrats and politicians want elections with integrity. Dominion might be harming their own brand by insisting in court that their machines CAN'T be surreptitiously manipulated.
Part 1: I'm responding to the criteria bureaucrats pretend they are using; hence, the reputational damage argument doesn't work.
Part 2: I'm not assuming anything about what bureaucrats want, I'm stating what democratic states ought to do.
Interesting question, will Fox settle or go to court? If they settle, then all those viewers they were trying so hard to please might walk away. If they fight in court Dominion will hammer them with the facts they seem to already have in hand. Fox could win but still look bad for all that comes out at the trial.
If they settle, it would probably be with no substantive comments and no admission of liability, so they'd almost certainly get away with it (in relation to their incredibly credulous viewers).
They'd get slaughtered at a trial.
Am I sensing that this reverse-TDS-stolen-election-fever finally breaking? I’m seeing a lot of “so what?“, “what about?“, “but Hillary…“, “still, Reason?” and “dems are worse” posts and not so much the defending the narrative that I’ve become accustomed to from the comentariat.
Welcome back to reality folks. It’s worse than ever.
Eat a bullet.
Oh yeah, good point. I missed "eat a bullet" type comments.
A country filled with the kinds of idiots who think that this
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j1nfhDqZkk0
is an acceptable way to count votes in a free country do not deserve a free country.
Note that the video is not about any kind of controversial activity; it is what Bloomberg published about ongoing, regular vote counting.
Many dems favor this "not-confidence-inspiring" absentee system and popular vote because it favors them just like reps favor more secure yet cumbersome in-person-with-ID voting and electoral college system which favors them. There are very few on either side interested in a free country.
By your standard we don't deserve a free country. That's fortunate because we don't have one. I suppose you're right though.
They may favor that, but nobody who looks at how these votes are counted can pretend with a straight face that a bunch of people moving around buckets of ballots and counting them on their desks results in trustworthy or accurate counts.
The piss-poor vote counting systems in the US didn't matter as long as government was small and limited. It's the combination of the enormous growth of government and the failure to secure voting systems that is the problem. And voters are responsible for both.
"Democracy is the theory that the common people know what they want and deserve to get it good and hard."
You know what's really crazy stuff....
USA voters electing Nazi's(National Socialists) to conquer the USA.
That's what the 2nd Amendment is for, buddy.
"He presented no evidence to support his outlandish claims, which were rejected by election officials of both parties, judges he had appointed, and his own attorney general."
Which is it fucktard?
Did he present no evidence?
Or was all the evidence that he presented rejected by the people he accused of the fraud?
The opening argument of the entire article conflicts with itself.
Jesus, the lies aren't even in English anymore...
As written, I interpret the sentence to mean his claims were rejected. The evidence was not rejected because as you pointed out, there was none presented.
Illegal E.O. voting changes.
Miss-counts confirmed by re-counts.
After hours UN-monitored counting.
... "there was none presented" ....
Evidence denial-ism.
None of which has been shown to be anything but 100% true.
The only manufactured excuse has been; it wouldn't have changed the results anyways.
And how are people outside the system supposed to bring evidence for a closed, government-run process? All you can bring to the legal system is a reasonable suspicion, and then you enter discovery.
And the basic standard here is wrong: it shouldn't be "bring evidence of fraud", it should be "the people conducting the election and providing the software must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the election was carried out properly and all, and only, valid ballots were counted. If they can't do that (and they can't), the election ought to be invalidated.
The problem is that the former President could not even bring "reasonable suspicions". All he had was conspiracy theories. We heard this in the January 6th hearings from one administration staffer after another. He was not looking for evidence, the former President was just throwing out crap he read on the internet or in this case heard on Fox news. Look the Fox News people knew he had lost, they weren't pushing this crap because they had "reasonable suspicions", they were pushing it to keep the stock price from falling.
Evidence denial ism 101.
.....but, but, but a few Russians in the basement purchasing Facebook ads was totally the reason Clinton wasn't elected and a 4-Year Congressional investigation was totally warranted.....
And using the Nazi-Empire agencies to completely CENSOR the sitting president and/or paint BS narratives on all the evidence was just "stopping conspiracy theories" that apparently have been 100% correct all along.
It's the same sh*t you leftards play compulsively and predictably... Call it racist, white supremacy, greedy, conspiracy-theory (whatever F'En name-calling you can come up with) and pretend name-calling is the halls of justice. [WE] gangster land mentality 100%.
Lots of people brought reasonable suspicion. In fact, it has been proven that numerous precincts and states violated election law in 2020, even more so than they violated it in prior elections. It has also been proven that billionaires manipulated the election by selectively spending money in Democratic districts, something that violates equal protection.
But that’s not the point. Even if there was no evidence, no won court cases, nothing else, “we don’t believe these results, prove that they are correct” should be sufficient.
Every election should be fully auditable. If it is not, it should be thrown out and redone, even if there is no actual evidence of fraud or misconduct. And US elections cannot be meaningfully audited.
In a sense, national popular vote might actually be a partial fix for this, because with it, a few Democrat precincts could change national outcomes with very limited election manipulation.
My intent was to defend the sentence as grammatically logical, not necessarily as true. That Sullum was not saying he presented no evidence and officials and judges rejected his evidence. Sullum was saying he presented no evidence and officials and attorneys rejected his claims.
Trump accused his own judges of participating in fraud against him?
Never heard that one!
Also most of it was a question of standing. He said they cheated this way and this way and this way and the judges said he should have brought that up before the election.
What is "insane" and "unbelievably offensive" is the idea that votes are counted by overpriced closed source software with obvious problems. Whether those problems actually led to changes in the outcome of the election or not is irrelevant. US voting procedures are garbage.
Of course, Reason is all in with this: there isn't a useless technology or big government overreach that Reason isn't on board with. Well, except for free drugs, open borders, government collusion with big tech, and pornography in public schools, all against the wishes of voters and parents: those must be defended at all cost by Reason writers or else the Koch funding disappears.
"which he attributed to systematic fraud on a scale that beggared belief"
No it doesn't. It only took 41,000 votes in 3 states to swing the election to Biden. That's nothing. As for evidence has no one at Reason watched "2000 Mules"? Literal ballot stuffing on video.
Who is this Mike with all the great articles? Can Reason hire him?
Is "less credulous than Tucker Carlson" a Thing ?
Actually about a year later:
NICK GILLESPIE | 9.23.2021 6:00 PM
It's all the articles from 2017-2020 that supported the Russiagate nonsense that are the worst of Reason.
Great article, Mike. I appreciate your work, I'm now creating over $35,400 dollars each month simply by doing a simple job online! I do know You currently making a lot of greenbacks online from $28,400 dollars, its simple online operating jobs.
.
.
Just open the link--------------------------------------------->>> http://Www.JobsRevenue.Com