Neither Democrats Nor Republicans Have a Clear Advantage Going Into Election Day
Plus: University cancels "The Problem of Whiteness" class, Twitter's snowflake-in-chief, and more...

Neither Republicans nor Democrats have a clear advantage as we head into Election Day tomorrow. Polls show the two major parties nearly tied when it comes to potential votes.
One of the latest polls comes from NBC, which found that among registered voters 47 percent said they prefer a Democrat-controlled Congress and 47 percent would like to see Republicans in control. Among those who described themselves as likely to vote, 48 percent supported Democrats and 47 percent supported Republicans, a difference that falls within the poll's margin of error. And Democrats—who had been lagging on interest in the midterm elections—have now caught up to the enthusiasm of their GOP counterparts, NBC found. Seventy-three percent of each now rate their interest as a "9" or "10" on a 10-point scale.
But behind these numbers, some potentially bad news for Democrats still lurks:
Only 44% of voters approve of President Biden's job performance, while 53% disapprove; more than 70% think the country is headed in the wrong direction; and a combined 81% say they are "very" or "somewhat" dissatisfied with the U.S. economy.
Figures like these make it less likely that Democrats will be able to retain control of either the U.S. House of Representatives or the Senate.
In the Senate—now split 50–50—gaining at least one more seat will give either side the majority. There are 35 Senate seats up for grabs, with 12 of these currently held by Democrats and 23 currently held by Republicans. "Though Republicans are defending more seats overall, only five are rated competitively by the Cook Political Report," notes Bloomberg Government. "Democrats are defending four seats rated competitively."
Republicans need to gain just five seats to take control of the House—and some analysts predict that they will do this easily. "The atmosphere is so murky that some Democratic strategists privately acknowledge that a loss of 20 seats would be a good night," The Washington Post reports.
Another broad poll released yesterday—this one from The Washington Post and ABC—also found a relatively even split between support for Republicans and Democrats. Among registered voters, 49 percent said they would vote for the Republican candidate in their congressional district and 48 percent for the Democratic candidate. And among likely voters, the split was 50 percent Republican and 48 percent Democrat. But Republican voters were significantly more likely to say it was certain that they would vote and to say they had been paying close attention to the election.
If you want to get more into the nitty gritty of polling on competitive races, FiveThirtyEight has you covered.
Politico also offers a thorough breakdown, focusing on the states likely to determine who control the Senate. "The midterms are coming to a close with a significant divide between some of the independent polling—especially surveys conducted using traditional telephone methodology, which has struggled to capture Republican support in recent elections—and polls released by GOP-affiliated firms, with their obvious self-interest," it notes.
The 10 most competitive Senate races include:
Arizona: Sen. Mark Kelly (D) vs. Blake Masters (R)
Colorado: Michael Bennet (D) vs. Joe O'Dea (R)
Georgia: Raphael Warnock (D) vs. Herschel Walker (R)
Nevada: Catherine Cortez Mastro (D) vs. Adam Laxalt (R)
New Hampshire: Maggie Hassan (D) vs. Don Bolduc (R)
North Carolina: Cheri Beasley (D) vs. Ted Budd (R)
Ohio: Tim Ryan (D) vs. J.D. Vance (R)
Pennsylvania: John Fetterman (D) vs. Mehmet Oz (R)
Washington: Patty Murray (D) vs. Tiffany Smiley (R)
Wisconsin: Mandela Barnes (D) vs. Ron Johnson (R)
In the House, the 35 races deemed most competitive by The Cook Political Report include contests in Arizona, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Illinois, Indiana, Maine, Michigan, Minnesota, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, Ohio, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Texas, Virginia, and Washington.
FREE MINDS
The University of Chicago canceled a class called "The Problem of Whiteness" after conservative students and activists complained. Conservatives of late have imagined themselves the defenders of academic freedom. But as recent right-wing enthusiasm for book bans, laws limiting how teachers talk about subjects like race and gender, and campaigns like this show, much of the right is still plenty happy to limit academic freedom when it challenges their worldview.
Looks like @UChicago caved to the censors. What a disappointment. You don't violate academic freedom just because some jackbooted Twitter thug throws a tantrum. https://t.co/vLJbxLIEWc
— Jeffrey Sachs (@JeffreyASachs) November 6, 2022
FREE MARKETS
Twitter's snowflake-in-chief. After promising to make Twitter more friendly to free speech and comedy and pledging to do away with permanent suspensions, new Twitter head Elon Musk changed his tune when faced with people poking fun at him. In response to some comedians impersonating him in a mocking—but clearly not-actually-him—way on Twitter, Musk declared yesterday: "Going forward, any Twitter handles engaging in impersonation without clearly specifying 'parody' will be permanently suspended."
— Katie Herzog (@kittypurrzog) November 7, 2022
Musk has also pushed back the rollout date for converting Twitter verification to a paid subscription plan. And after Twitter fired roughly half of its employees last Friday, the company is now reportedly asking some fired workers to come back. Meanwhile, many big companies are suspending Twitter ad buys. Musk's tenure as Twitter boss is—to put it mildly—not off to an excellent start.
QUICK HITS
• "Scores of pre-election lawsuits have been filed in battleground states ahead of Tuesday's election," reports CNN. "Much of the current litigation focuses on the processes surrounding how votes are cast and counted—with some lawsuits seizing on the same debunked conspiracy theories about election fraud that propelled the court efforts to overturn the 2020 election."
• Another win for Tofurky (and the First Amendment, and common sense).
• Democrats' long goodbye to the working class.
• Facebook's parent company, Meta, is reportedly planning a huge round of layoffs.
• British researchers are testing lab-grown blood.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Neither Democrats Nor Republicans Have a Clear Advantage Going Into Election Day
Oh my
Polls are never wrong!
But voters are!
The incumbent party is always at a disadvantage in the mid-terms. Who has the advantage varies by state, but independents decide elections and they are not happy with Joe.
This is just Reason cheer-leading for the Democrats while trying to appear to not be doing that.
Yeah, I know. By Wednesday morning, ENB will be on suicide watch.
I am currently earning an additional $33,440 over the course of six months from home by utilizing incredibly honest and fluent online sports activities athletics. This domestic hobby provides the month. Given the stats system, I’m currently interacting fast on this hobby’s road and earning..,
HERE====)>https://www.pay.hiring9.com
Even the BBC is wondering if the DNC’s backing of MAGA Republicans in the primaries is going to backfire.
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-63537683
Some states will have up to a week to figure out how to fortify elections post nov 8th.
2 minimum in PA
Babylon Bee headlines:
Biden Says It May Take Days For Democrat Votes To Be Double-Counted
Democrats Worried Republicans May Take Lead Beyond Margin Of Cheating
Republicans And Democrats Agree To Not Claim Election Was Rigged If They Win
This Poll is completely useless for reporting on the horse race over the Senate and Congress.
Right, wrong or indifferent, senators are weighted with different populations. 2 senators represent Wyoming. 2 Senators represent New York. The popular poll from those two states would indicate a strong preference for a Dem Senate, but the result would be a split between the two.
Likewise, the fate of congress isn't up to a popular poll, it comes down to those few competitive congressional seats that could flip.
I cannot understand what possessed ENB to post this "Analysis". It is not germane. It is inapt. Citing this data would make all of her readers LESS INFORMED about the election, if people gave it any credence. Luckily, her reporting is increasingly seen as the stories that blue-checks tell each day over coffee to make themselves feel better.
Some reason writers are just liars; Welch, Shackford, and DeRugy come to mind. Some are just nuts like Sudderman. Brown, however, just seems really stupid.
I agree that ENB is really stupid, but she's also a liar.
It’s not a lie if she believes it.
Is that a George Costanzaism?
It's part of the definition of lying. Has to be a deliberate statement of something the speaker knows not to be true.
Yes, a lie requires intent.
Indeed it is.
It is to make all the dem wins seem less surprising and more believable to your average rube.
I cannot understand what possessed ENB to post this “Analysis”.
Cope.
But don't you know that the Senate is racist? New York should get like 20 Senators, and Wyoming only one--contingent on approval from New York.
Yeah, the Dems see the Senate as a threat to democracy. Especially with rules like needing more than 46 votes out of 100 to pass their whole legislative program.
This is a pretty hastily thrown together morning report.
And they had all Sunday off. We deserve some meaty analysis after subsisting all weekend on Tofurkey!!
Expect more middle of the night ballot dumps that push dems over the top. Obama, Biden, and company have been out there banging on about threats to democracy to get ahead of the criticism. And if bring it up here, ENB will do her part to toe the party line:
with some lawsuits seizing on the same debunked conspiracy theories about election fraud that propelled the court efforts to overturn the 2020 election.
I assumed that was to justify the violence that is scheduled to begin on November 9.
no, it is to discredit anyone who questions the results too loudly
Ballot dumps. For fuck's sake, Fergus. You still can't accept that every reported accusation of widespread fraud (like that one) was investigated and none were found to be vaild. Not a single one.
I know, I know. Your gut and instincts tell you otherwise. But when you have one narrative that has zero evidence and every accusation of widespread fraud has been baseless, your instincts are obviously wrong.
Trump lost. Build a bridge and get over it.
Not a single ballot dump was denied. They were just dismissed as a large bunch of ballots from overwelmingly dem areas. After 80% of the vote counted there is no believable way there was a batch of ballots that spike the dem candidate then the slope of change goes right back to what it was the before the ballot dump. But you believe what you want.
The delusion is strong in that one.
So you're going to stand by the results, no matter the outcome, right?
Right?
Looking forward to hearing from you Wednesday morning, as to how happy you that our beleaguered democracy remains intact.
Hillary's already saying 2024 will be stolen......
She’s just russian to judgment again!
+
Well this is an easily provable lie as theybhave convictions for 2020 voter fraud. Likewise tbey have instances of known double voting they refused to prosecute.
Not to say that the fraud claims are proven, but the claim that "every accusation was investigates and found invalid" isn't exactly true. Generally, that claim is based on the outcome of the court cases which were filed, but a majority of those cases were thrown out on the basis that the groups bringing the cases lacked standing to bring the suits in the first place, or had brought the suits too late to be valid; the latter is probably a major driver for a lot of the cases which have been brought to court before election day this year.
People and media outlets looking for a reason to dismiss all of the claims (or at least the ones not coming from Stacey Abrams) took the dismissed cases as instances where the "evidence was examined and found insufficient", but in reality those cases represent instances where whatever evidence there might have been wasn't really examined to a level which supports a conclusion one way or the other. Determination of "standing" in a legal proceeding gets sorted out before the evidence is introduced.
If I were to sue Jussie Smolett for fraud over his "maga country" hate crime hoax, the case would get thrown out of court immediately, because I can't prove that what he did harmed (or really effected) me in any way. That doesn't mean he was telling the truth about the attack though.
This has already been explained repeatedly to the lying lefties like Nelson here. He will continue to ignore it and make the same claims again in the future.
So, legally documented 110% turnout does NOT indicate fraud, right?
Depends.
Among Chicago graveyards, 110% turnout is considered low.
Wednesday morning is going to be fun.
In 2016 it was a total surprise. We'll probably never experience that schadenfreude again.
I was doing a measure-up at a hotel the morning after, and the hotel manager was glued to the TV in every room type we visited.
Not because she was particularly political, she had just never seen every person on the news lose their collective minds all together at once like that before.
2016 was weird. My co-workers were really broken up over it. First time I'd ever been in a notably different stage of grief than everyone else. All those people found out just that morning that they were going to hate the President. I'd known for months that I was going to be sad about whoever won.
Nobody seemed to appreciate the humor of my acting like I was really surprised Gary Johnson hadn't won.
Ha.
Your co-workers are assholes, but I expect you already know that.
you mean next Wednesday morning, a week from now
The shill ENB just can't let go, don't dream it's over.
Hey now, hey now....
Look, we’re going in circles here!
Such fun is something so strong
Now let’s not get carried away!
Neither Democrats Nor Republicans Have a Clue Going Into Election Day
I’ll stick with the party that isn’t Marxist.
I think the party currently at the steering wheel, spinning their tires in the ditch they drove into, is probably at a distinct disadvantage.
And Democrats—who had been lagging on interest in the midterm elections—have now caught up to the enthusiasm of their GOP counterparts, NBC found.
...within their newsrooms.
And after Twitter fired roughly half of its employees last Friday, the company is now reportedly asking some fired workers to come back.
A whole dozen of them.
And just the actual software engineers.
"I would love to come in for a discussion of my significant retention bonus."
The atmosphere is so murky that some Democratic strategists privately acknowledge that a loss of 20 seats would be a good night...
...for those who like to eat out and send their kids to school and have a small business.
A net loss of 4% is a good night, and somehow this is murky? The only thing murke is just how bad it gets pre-fortification but here ENB is claiming rules changes being ruled unconstitutional was somehow "debunked" when she really means denied by party hacks.
Anyone who doesn't want a lazy and stupid fool for President will vote Republican.
Four days ago Biden blamed gas companies for not drilling enough and yesterday he said he would ban all drilling
Do you want an unprincipled mindless ass like that running your country?????
This is not a Presidential election. Are you expecting impeachment?
NO but if his minions in congress are replaced with conservatives we can stop any new laws that he promotes and even overturn some bad laws.
Laws, you say? He don't need no stink'n laws. Just the "flick of a pen" or maybe pretending there was a law, or something.
Hey you also need a phone
That's the problem -- overriding an executive order requires Presidential approval or veto override.
Plus - you cant overrule Dem Prez executive orders... only Rep ones
There are quite a few cabinet members that Congress should indeed impeach and let go. It is one of their powers.
To which Reason will stay consistent with their position on impeachment, right?
Just have to find a mean tweet to justify it.
Well, a mean tweet against Democrats or journalists, but I repeat myself. They seem to be just fine with even fraud committed by Democrats.
I sure am, though I know I'll be disappointed.
Why the hell not? If it was good enough for the Dems with Trump, should be fun for the GOP with Sleepy Joe. (Though probably a waste of time unless the Republicans get 2/3 of the Senate.)
Looting the Treasury to the tune of 400 billion dollars Congress never authorized ought to at least count as a misdemeanor, if not a high crime.
“Anyone who doesn’t want a lazy and stupid fool for President will vote Republican.”
How does that work? I quite clearly remember the 2020 Presidential race featuring two major party candidates who are lazy and stupid fools.
Yup, pretty much the same. One accused of being a fascist and the other a practicing fascist.
Trump’s lazy now?
He certainly didn't take the time to vet major appointments did he?
He blindly trusted his transition committee. One of his faults when he took over.
That was poor judgement. Dude’s always got his fingers in shit. Easily distracted? Disorganized? Sure. But lazy? No.
That's long been a comment about him, he doesn't really do the work he doesn't want to do. It's been hard to get him to study and prepare for talks, things like that.
He's a born-on-third-base trust fund baby who never had to earn a single thing he has. He's as lazy as they come.
Someone's diapers are full of resentment
And yet, somehow, even while most 'trust fund' kids end up being broke and all that 'generational wealth' gets squandered somehow Trump managed to keep all of it and grow it substantially.
Those hotels all over the world just built themselves.
"most ‘trust fund’ kids end up being broke"
Are you sure about that? Of course, there are plenty of examples of trust funders losing it all, but how do you know it is "most"?
Renata, if you're voting for the president in this election then you are not rational.
Recycled fake ballot?
You are making my point but thanks anyway
Does ENB actually believe that headline?
BOAF SIDEZ!
She just can't help being on the side of the "good people," can she?
Yes, that would be the Manhattan dispensers of Chardonnay wisdom.
Neiman Marxists.
Hey, that there's funny!
That's very good. +3
Is that where AOC shops for her formal gowns?
Yes, with TAX THE RICH!!! emblazoned across her ass.
Maybe it's an offer to the lower classes to tax her assets. Directly.
I’ve got something I can emblazon her face, tits, stomach, hair, and the small of her back.
formal gowns
She probably shops at Ross
/I know I do....
Any other fanboys see ENB and think E Nelson Bridwell?
Twitter's snowflake-in-chief.
PrIvAtE CoMpAnY!
Funny how Twitter's former regime were never snowflakes to ENB.
You mean the righteous defenders of the holy faith (as defined by her preferred elites)?
Nor did they earn any of her angst for censoring. Of course, ENB is a far left progressive and Twitter's former regime was on her side. She's just defending her tribe and attacking their enemies.
Anointed Acolytes!
turning off accounts for impersonation other accounts has all ways been a rule at twitter but when Elon does it OMG a snowflake... EMDS = Elon Musk Dearaingment Syndrom. So far he has done nothing the left said he was going to do which is typical of their projection
“without clearly specifying 'parody'”
Pretty sure that is new to Twitter — and it’s always great for parody to label itself as parody! Makes it so much funnier!
So, parody accounts have to label themselves a parody now? Or is it just parodies of specific products?
I don't know. It was just a vague tweet by Musk. Not sure if it means the user's handle has to have the word "parody" or their bio has to have the word "parody" or ???
What ultimately matters is what it says in the license agreement and the site rules. Even Elon Musk tacitly acknowledged that; he followed up with a tweet where he directed everyone to the rules.
That sounds like an explicit acknowledgement.
Mad magazine used to label parodies, such as
Batboy & Rubin
The Gaines family’s former partners at DC didn’t care for Superduperman!
Kathi Griffin's should have her mom's account shut down for spoofing a human being.
The Twitter drama has certainly produced an ocean's worth of milk from the elite lolcows and various journoscum. Let's recap ENB's limited context posting here:
-Musk buys Twitter and promises to revamp it into something that isn't just some social media safe space for the Left.
--Says that Twitter can't survive solely on ad revenue and announces that he'll turn the internet sticker into a subscription service. Initially, this was $20 until Stephen King screeched at him, so he dropped it to $8 ("I know you're a prostitute, we're just negotiating the price").
--AOC does her typical middle school burn book stupidity, finds that her account is wonky and blames Tesla Man Bad despite the fact it was a site glitch that was affecting multiple users (a fact that of course was little reported by journoscum).
-Journoscum and other Hollywood malbushim migrate over to the Fediverse at Mastodon, only to be surprised to walk into an poasting environment that's more like the glory days of mid-2000s era internet.
-Rumors emerge that Twitter employees were running a black market for blue checks that went as high as $15,000--which sheds light on why some of the Blue Check Brigade is having a fit about the subscription plan--leading to additional speculation that people also paid under the table to get suspended accounts turned back on.
-Hollywood malbushim and journoscum are so ass-mad at Musk supposedly breaking up their heavily curated safe space that they start changing their Twitter handles to "Elon Musk," not realizing that part of the verification privilege means not spoofing other accounts just for burn book points, then actually believe they've exposed some sort of "hypocrisy" when their accounts get shut down.
And the best part is that Musk hasn't made ANY actual changes to the the platform other than the subscription service for the internet sticker and more features, and a rule about spoofing accounts. That's it.
If there was no other evidence that these people are a net drain on society and the country would hardly suffer for their absence, the last week is elegant proof all by itself.
“Rumors emerge that Twitter employees were running a black market for blue checks that went as high as $15,000–which sheds light on why some of the Blue Check Brigade is having a fit about the subscription plan–leading to additional speculation that people also paid under the table to get suspended accounts turned back on.”
First I’m hearing of this. Got a good cite? Man, this whole episode keeps getting more and more entertaining.
First I’m hearing of this. Got a good cite? Man, this whole episode keeps getting more and more entertaining.
Elon Musk responded directly to a tweet alleging this, saying that this was actually the case. Reason won't let me embed links, but "twitter $15,000" on Google pulls up plenty of hits for now.
Haha, that’s great.
It won't?
linky link from the Verge
There actually has been a slight change. Conservative shitposters have been able to marginally post more critical things/dank memes that would have gotten them suspended earlier (for example, Oilfield_Rando and Neville_the_Cat). Nothing horrendously obvious, but it's apparent that they are worrying less about self-censoring what they post, and they are not being punished for it. Whether this is a result of the tamping down of the censorship squad at Twitter, or mere overwork or lockout of employees, it is starting a more robust criticism of The Powers That Be, and allowing these accounts to be better aggregators of news/nonsense on the internets every morning.
I believe Musk was supposed to fire pretty much the entire censorship, er, "content management" team, so a lot of the milder shitposts are probably getting through because those fuckers all got locked out this weekend. The whole "instances of people saying the 'N-word' went up 500%" was mostly trolls testing the algorithms and moderation environment, not Musk being okay with such language. From what I understand, most of that got shut down pretty fast because it's already embedded in the software.
Addendum: Per that article David Frum posted a few days ago, there's a few tweets calling for Biden to strip Musk of his government contracts and security clearances after endorsing the GOP for the mid-terms, for "election interference."
Yeah, go ahead and cut yourself off from one of the two companies capable of putting our satellites into orbit that give you GPS in the middle of nowhere, because fuck knows you're too dumb to know how to read an actual map that doesn't order you around like a fucking dog, all to take down Tesla Man Bad.
Where does this idiotic delusion that because he owns Twitter he's not supposed to talk about politics come from?
But Republican voters were significantly more likely to say it was certain that they would vote and to say they had been paying close attention to the election.
That enthusiasm gap is democracy's death knell.
Democracy dies when the wrong people vote.
Or at least Democrats do. In darkness, no less.
The University of Chicago canceled a class called "The Problem of Whiteness" after conservative students and activists complained.
White supremacy, thy name is Karen.
Cannot fathom why people might be annoyed that an institution that takes federal funding would use their money to attack them. Perhaps if they insulted hookers would arouse ENB a bit.
Normies realize what would happen if you had a class called "The Problem of Blackness," or "The Problem with Women," and think the same should apply to whites, Hispanics, Asians, males, etc. It takes a sophisticate to say "Akshually, they're totally different."
But as recent right-wing enthusiasm for book bans, laws limiting how teachers talk about subjects like race and gender, and campaigns like this show, much of the right is still plenty happy to limit academic freedom when it challenges their worldview.
ENB would have been much happier if they had just made a companion class, "The Problem of Blackness".
The NYT says CRT is just "lessons about race," don't you know.
The Problem with Jewishness The Problem with Islam The Problem with Asian Tiger Moms
I could do this all day. It all has Jeffery Sachs seal of approval.
"The problem with Jewishness" would be ok with the left.
And the right. The two groups would identify different problems, though.
You know who else it would be OK with that?
ENB has really amped up the "right-wing" criticisms, while never mentioning similar about the left.
Let's see:
Today, ENB linked to an article about how Democrats are abandoning the working class.
Yesterday, she criticized AOC. And linked to a review of Hillary and Chelsea's new Apple+ show that asks the question, "Presumably there's a point to 'Gutsy,' but what?" And she criticized the Socialist Workers' Party of Spain.
The day before that she questioned why the White House is bragging about Social Security increases that are automatically triggered by inflation.
Yeah, sure, she never criticizes the left. Never.
Yesterday, she criticized AOC. And linked to a review of Hillary and Chelsea’s new Apple+ show that asks the question, “Presumably there’s a point to ‘Gutsy,’ but what?” And she criticized the Socialist Workers’ Party of Spain.
There were no Reason articles yesterday.
She'll occasionally criticize some leftists, but she never says things like "left wing" policies are doing such-n-such. But you already know that.
I don’t call him Mike Liarson for nothing.
So, she doesn't criticize the left in exactly the way you want her to. Got it
She really doesn’t criticize the left at all.
I think maybe she took some flack for that AOC bit? This could be reparations….
The entire academy is far left.
They have been beating up on moderate, white, non-progressive more and more over the last decade. Which is pretty much punching down, the progressives being the overwhelming majority in power positions at universities these days. Anyone with any alternative opinion literally gets shouted down, and we hear reports of conservative speakers being branded Nazis almost constantly.
Someone says "I'd appreciate it if you didn't demonize me any more" just one time, and ENB suddenly thinks this is a both sides issue.
Go find someone minding his own business. Kick him in the balls, over and over and over. After the 20th kick, when he punches you in the nose, then its "White men sure are happy to use violence when it suits their political agenda!"
Fuck ENB, if the world is as you say, there are plenty of genuine issues of authoritarianism to pick from. Find one that's more sympathetic for your argument.
I’d like to feel that she’d be screeching about that that. And then recognize the inherent racism in the former is exactly like the inherent racism in the latter.
A “problem of whiteness” would seem to be based on the notion that people are born with inherent negative traits that are strictly associated with the color of their skin, but it would be anathema to imply that blacks or hispanics or asians or… have inherent negative traits strictly due to the color of their skin.
Somehow it’s OK to make racist assumptions about white people? It's not, it's still racist.
I wonder if the ACLU, media at large, and basically every institution in our society would be openly accepting of having federal funds used to push a class with ANY other race:
"The Problem with Blackness"
or to highlight some recent history:
"The Problem with Jews"
These are your 'anti-racists' people, they are definitely here to fix society
It's also perfectly OK in their book to use common racist tropes, provided that the POC being targeted is not on team blue.
"Herschel Walker's candidacy is a white insult to Black people."
"Walker is what they think of us, and they think we’re big, ignorant, and easily manipulated. They think we’re shady or criminal. They think we’re tools to be used. The Walker campaign exists as a political minstrel show: a splashy rendition of what white Republicans think Black people look and sound like."
"I make a hard distinction between Black conservatives and these tokens" – referring to Senator Tim Scott (R-SC) and Walker – "who are out here right now, shucking and jiving for their white handlers."
"Walker has positioned himself into being a useful fool for those who don't have the best interests of Black people or this democracy at heart."
"[Herschel Walker's] irrelevant to the Black community, and we should treat him as such."
"Herschel Walker, the football star turned Georgia Senate candidate, is an animated caricature of a Black person drawn by white conservatives."
"Most white people in the South vote 'R' like their entire white supremacist project depends on it."
"Georgia Republicans want Walker because he's Black and Warnock is Black, and they think they can defeat Warnock in November if they can shave just a little of the Black vote..."
"Mr. Walker was merely a vessel for the G.O.P. and Mr. Trump's ambitions."
"He's a puppet on a string, and somebody's pulling those strings really good."
I think Shrike's used almost all of those, if not all of those regarding Walker at one time or another.
He really is a vile being.
It's been comical to watch the Herschel Walker/Rafael Warnock race, and just how willing Democrats have been to call Walker an uppity negro. They somehow condemn how racist Republicans are in the same breath.
Not to be outdone in using racist attacks against blacks, the Democrats seem intent on racist attacks on Hispanics, too.
Democratic lawmakers and liberal media outlets alike have responded to the Republican Party's gains with Latino voters by attacking Hispanic Republicans. Flores's opponent in November, Rep. Vicente Gonzalez (D., Texas), argued in June that he is more qualified than Flores because he "wasn't born in Mexico." Weeks later, Arizona representative Rubén Gallego (D.) said a female Hispanic Republican running for Congress in the state was not sufficiently Latina because she took her husband's last name.
The New York Times, meanwhile, said Flores's win marked the "Rise of the Far-Right Latina," citing the Republican's support for religiosity, strong borders, and traditional values. A Texas political blog that has received campaign funds from Gonzalez also attacked Flores last month, referring to the congresswoman as "Miss Frijoles," "Miss Enchiladas," and a "cotton pickin' liar."
"Who does this Mayra Flores think she is? Somebody said she was crowned Miss Frijoles 2022 in San Benito," Texas political blogger Jerry McHale, who has received $1,200 from Gonzalez's campaign, wrote on July 2. "She isn't in congressman Vicente Gonzalez's league. She isn't even in the bush leagues unless she doesn't shave her p**sy."
What a stupid President. "They should be drilling more"
The Biden administration is revoking dozens of invalid drilling permits issued by agency workers without the approval of political appointees, despite a temporary order for such reviews.
The Interior Department on Friday notified affected oil and gas producers that roughly 70 permits governing onshore wells were improperly issued and that the companies need to seek new approvals.
But, but, Rig Count!
We’re hours away from finding out just how much rigs count.
I am sure Biden will lead the way by traveling only in a Tesla (oops, maybe another brand) and a sailboat.
Speaking of sailboats, did you hear that the next-gen sail-powered aircraft carriers are back on the Democratic budget? Detractors had pointed out that planes could not operate on a deck obstructed by masts. But then supporters deleted all aircraft since they burn stinky avgas and jet fuel.
Sail powered aircraft carriers carrying sling shot propelled hang gliders?
Did Adm. Nelson need all that crap to defeat his enemies? No?
Then it is unpatriotic to think our U.S. Navy can't be as good or better than the Royal Navy.
What's black and slides down Nelson's column?
The Royal Nay-Vee?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1qI9XSWQbkE
"Can ya dig it, man?" 🙂
Nelson was shot and killed at Trafalgar. Remember that.
After losing his right arm in battle at Tenerife. I wonder what his personal pronouns were
(lefty/loosey)
tighty/whitey
Less so
Funny
I should have gone for (list/port). 😉
Badass/Bad Motherfucker.
Kari Lake made a good point the other day:
When have you ever seen a poll that overestimated Republican chances? Never mind media predictions.
I'm hoping enough people have come to their senses to finally repudiate the nonsense that has been dispensed by Democrats and their MSM propagandists.
Don't you know that if you repeat a lie often enough, and back it up with properly curated elections, most people will believe it?
Dewey vs. Truman but that was a million years ago.
Nice.
Dismantle the MSM. They have no right their propaganda.
Yes, Republicans lie to pollsters and then whine that the polls aren't accurate.
As long as your side loses, it's all good.
After promising to make Twitter more friendly to free speech and comedy and pledging to do away with permanent suspensions, new Twitter head Elon Musk changed his tune when faced with people poking fun at him.
Thus reassuring the Blue Checks that there are guardrails and the elections are once again safe from misinformation.
I don't tweet, but my understand is that Kathy Griffin changed her handle to Elon Musk. How is one supposed to recognize that as parody? And if that is so, why does Twitter let people change their handle to match an existing handle?
We know how much havoc impersonating someone here can cause.
apparently they never have allowed that but ELOOOOOOOON
The latest literally Hitler.
1. Who cares if you recognize it as parody? There is no parody exception to the 1st amendment.
2. You can't change your account name - which is displayed alongside the handle. No one with half a brain misses that. Sadly, most people don't have half a brain, hence Count Dankula making people lose their minds because they thought Trump was back online.
And her blue check carried over after the handle change. So it, like many other fake Elon Musk tweets from blue-check celebs, would look like verified Elon Musk tweets. Bet they'd all be crying if Elon Musk tweeted using their handles...
Scores of pre-election lawsuits have been filed in battleground states ahead of Tuesday's election...
Election denialism!
...some lawsuits seizing on the same debunked conspiracy theories about election fraud that propelled the court efforts to overturn the 2020 election.
Never before have we seen political parties resorting to lawsuits.
"...some lawsuits". Ha! I see what they're highlighting there.
I wonder if there are any lawsuits coming from the Democrats side. Probably something like, "Jim Crow", blah, blah, blah.
Those are the good lawsuits fighting against Voter Suppression.
My resistance >>> your oppression
You're as delusional and disconnected from reality as Nancy Pelosi, you lipstick lesbian with a beard.
I can't wait to drink in the salty ham tears of you and all the rest of you Reason fake libertarians very, very soon now!
Another win for Tofurky...
...and, as always with Tofurky, loss for everyone else.
Democrats' long goodbye to the working class.
There can be no forgiveness for voting Trump.
Eternal damnation.
RE: Amnesty for Ken & Karen (Branch Covidians)
Uh....no. Not now, not ever. There is no forgiveness, no amnesty. For the petty tyrants who suppressed our freedom, gleefully cheered at our suffering and death, threatened our jobs, mandated vaccines, threatened to take away our children, they must be seen to pay a severe, tangible price.
I'd forgive...once they actually confessed what they did wrong and sincerely apologized for it.
But that has not been done.
Amnesty and forgiveness depends on remorse. I have seen none.
Yup. They just want to escape blame by claiming they didn't know and couldn't have known, after screeching with covered ears and trying to bury their political enemies for nearly three years.
Exactly. Also, there is an air of "and, under similar circumstances, we would do it all again" in a lot of the messaging of this forgiveness/amnesty talk.
So, fuck them.
Nope.
As I pointed out before. All the past, good faith conversations about habeas corpus, bodily autonomy, kids in cages/open borders, slavery, oppression... all the premises ceded because (e.g.) 'property rights are important but people can't own each other' or 'We should respect agency outright but at what point does a clump of cells become a (potential) agent?'... all of those conversations they actually gave zero shits about property rights *or* people being owned. Zero shits about whole adults having their own agency or not.
No, they can shut up, eat the turkey and mash potatoes, and if they're going to speak, be grateful that, if not for the grace of God, it would all be poisoned with aquarium cleaner like they deserve.
"I'm not upset that you lied to me, I'm upset that from now on I can't believe you." - Nietzsche
Make them eat Tofurkey for an entire weekend like we had to. Now that might not be Justice, but it sure would be sweet revenge!
And if they made their wives prepare lemonade like the ladies at Hot Dog On A Stick, then forgiveness will be liberally dispensed
Yeah, forgiveness requires actual contrition, not a disingenuous attempt to stave off fury when your team's about to get its shit pushed in.
Even Satan is deserving of forgiveness, but only if he humbles himself to do so, and like him, these people are far too proud to ever admit that they fucked up and indulged in rejection-obsessed behavior. When vaxx-pimping whores like Julie Powell catch COVID and die of a heart attack a few weeks later the day after getting hairy black tongue, you're not going to see anything other than grave-dancing.
Those people are still in power, and likely will always be in power, so they really don't need the amnesty. Our betters just kind of wanted to be adored again.
Those in power, you're right. But, honestly, a good round of humiliation for the rank and file Branch Covidians might not be a bad consolation prize. Those in power need a base of believers to normalize this behavior going forward.
We live in a post shame society.
Dean Koontz is taking copious notes for his next series.
What do you think higher ed, DEI consultants, and NPR are for?
https://twitter.com/JewellEffect/status/1589641520180625410
No #amnesty, not now not EVER.....
November 2020.
Melbourne security guard chokes a teenager unconscious and carries him out for not wearing a face mask.
Amnesty? No chance!
Yup, I'll never vote for the lockdowners or those who subsidized them.
Facebook's parent company, Meta, is reportedly planning a huge round of layoffs.
Learn to journalism.
70% drops in stock prices tend to do that. Shocked there are no investor lawsuits about it.
The stock market is racist!
"Stocks are down 70%. Inflation bested!" -Brandon
What is your criticism precisely?
This is a shot in the dark, you faux-autistic fucking chode, but I think he was making a joke riffing on the "learn to code" phrase. You know, the one that was bandied about by journalists when blue collar workers in extraction were being laid off, but which they successfully got banned-on-sight from every major social media outlet when mass layoffs at major national newspapers were announced? Does that help at all, or do you need a citation?
Ok - ay... See ya...
Outside of the aggressive insulting tone [which you should be used to by now] that was a well laid out response to your question. Why do I get the feeling you muted this account?
Mike Liarson is a squawking bird named Dee and should be treated as such.
Dee? That bitch!
This guy gets it.
The feculent choad will require a citation.
Dee isn’t intelligent enough to be autistic.
At the point that you're trying to flex on Fist you need to take a step back. He's the only good person on this site. That includes the writers.
"Flex on"?
He made a vague criticism of ENB. I would like to know what that criticism is.
That she linked to a Wall Street Journal article instead of doing her own investigation? That it isn't true that Meta is going to have layoffs?
I've asked Fist questions like this before, and he hasn't taken offense. Often, he actually gives me more explanation of what he meant.
Dimwit.
*double facepalm*
It's super awful to ask people what they mean by comments they make.
Roscoe was correct. It was a reversal of the "learn to code" thing.
Although rethinking it now, I probably should have gone with "learn to coal". Where's that edit button?
Fist was here before all of us, and will be here when Reason finally implodes in on itself and becomes a black hole.
As Fist left the First Comment, so too will he leave the Last Comment.
I don’t think Fist has been around any longer than I have, since I have been on Hit & Run since almost the beginning.
"Cite?"
Y'know, just for a little variety, I'm going to assume that the comment Liarson left was actually really witty and clever. And I'll just never check so I never find out if I was wrong or not.
Mike's just ass-blasted that his lefty boos are being dunked on. The sad part is that he and chemtard actually think their website hall monitor act is actually convincing to any lurkers.
I AM ETERNAL
Sure, "Fist" is a good guy. But what of my sockpuppets? Many of those guys are total dicks.
Unless you're a fucking octopus there's no way you could run enough keyboards fast enough to have sockpuppets, Fist.
I don't think it's directed at ENB at all.
To be fair at the time I suspected some might mistake it as that. But I knew the bulk of my fellow commenters would follow my brain thoughts on this.
Somehow Dee misses the joke on a regular basis.
Odd, given that Dee is the joke a lot of the time.
*facepalm*
I withdraw my question. I now see that the comment was supposed to be a joke directed at Meta, not ENB.
NO COMMENT AMNESTY
Fair enough.
You really are autistic, aren’t you?
Losing $31B in 5 years on a product which no one seems to need they know will do that
British researchers are testing lab-grown blood.
Vampire normalizing inbound, guv'na.
Impossible Blood (TM)!
Is it plant based?
Does it turn recipients into the Swamp Thing?
Does it come preclotted? Unlike the stupid vaccine where you have to wait
Tru Blood?
Is this true, blood?
Biden ruins his and shrikes narrative on drilling.
“No more drilling. There is no more drilling,” Biden snapped at a young woman in the crowd. “I haven’t formed any new drilling.”
.
“There are at least five more years of offshore drilling,” the woman shouted back. “— in the Atlantic or the Pacific but in the Antarctic and off the gulf of New Mexico.”
.
“That was before I was president,” Biden responded. “We’re trying to work on that and get that done.”
https://www.dailywire.com/news/ahead-of-midterm-elections-biden-snaps-at-rally-no-more-drilling-there-is-no-more-drilling
Only one man alone can solve our energy problems, and that man is SleepyJoe.
Just step back and let him work his magic.
Let Joe Cook!!
Hey, you can’t use what Biden said as any evidence for official policy.
And has that house dinger spokesmodel walked Biden's “no drilling” rant back yet?
The University of Chicago canceled a class called "The Problem of Whiteness" after conservative students and activists complained. Conservatives of late have imagined themselves the defenders of academic freedom. But as recent right-wing enthusiasm for book bans, laws limiting how teachers talk about subjects like race and gender, and campaigns like this show, much of the right is still plenty happy to limit academic freedom when it challenges their worldview.
I'm beyond flabbergasted that this is the stance Reason would take on this. Not really surprised, just this is like the utter defeat of Reason/reason. After years of professors being hounded in their offices, accosted in the halls, violent disruption of speeches, first-hand videos of such, full receipts, hoax racial stunts propagated via Tweets, we get "A stupid *class* that conservatives *students* (aka, the customers, Reason) didn't approve of was cancelled because of their activism." without evidence beyond tweeting.
So, how long until we get the article cheerleading FIRE for defending professors' free speech rights to teach a "Problem of Whiteness" class to students against their will?
Get fucked Reason.
No shit. One can learn a lot about oneself by swapping black / white, and male / female / trans.
The Problems with Blackness.
The Problems with Yellowness.
The Problems with Femaleness.
The Problems with Tranness.
The only way to eliminate racism is to stop being racist.
Actually, the only way to eliminate racism is to remove the benefits it brings for politics, tribalism, and retarded human thinking. Good luck with that.
Even more actually, racism can never be eliminated. It can't even be defined; physical and psychological characteristics pretty much define relationships.
The only good solution is freedom of association, let the skin color bigots announce their fetishes to society, and let individuals base their decisions on their own bigotry towards bigots.
The way to remove racism is to not be racist. So if we want to eliminate racism there can be no more democrats.
Vote R.E.D.
Remove
Every
Democrat
There aren't any racist Republicans?
It's at least possible to be one who isn't.
Nice +1
Yeah, OK (though I think there may be 1 or 2 non-racist Democrats).
Probably a few, but racism isn’t baked into the GOP party platform.
Yeah. Think about just how dumb you have to *assume* your average black, Mexican, Jewish, Asian, Muslim, etc., etc., etc. college student is that they would look at a course titled, “The Problem With Whiteness” and think “Yup. That would never be a problem for someone like me because I’m not white.”
Whether it’s true or not, the narrative “The only reason the class got cancelled is because conservatives.” is just mindblowing.
They should own it if they did.
"We cancelled 'Problem With Whiteness'. Fuck everyone who disagrees" - Right Of Center
The Trouble With Trbbles was also racist.
don't forget to mention teh
"book bans" and teacher discussion limits are for younger age groups there is no limits beyond K-12 or outside of schools. it is a purposely deciteful and invalid comparison
Reason bloggers again concern-trolling libertarians by characterizing popular resistance against government elite-imposed propaganda as inimical to free speech and pluralism, and therefore as bad as the elite-imposed propaganda regime itself. Like how when the good guy picks up the weapon the heel has surreptitiously been using, the referee catches him.
That's an excellent analogy
@Reason bloggers again concern-trolling libertarians by characterizing popular resistance against government elite-imposed propaganda as inimical to free speech and pluralism, and therefore as bad as the elite-imposed propaganda regime itself. Like how when the good guy picks up the weapon the heel has surreptitiously been using, the referee catches him.”
^ Just reposting to increase the odds f someone at Reason reading it…while alone with his/her/their conscience.
Dude, they literally supported the Berserkely goon squad that physically attacked Milo Yiannopoulos and his supporters. What the fuck else would you expect?
You'd better hide your uncool niece
I think ENB should bring up “The Problem of Whiteness” at the next Reason staff meeting, where you could probably go snow blind.
Robby does cover stories of the other side a lot. So, that's good for him, and I think that gives him credence to go after both sides.
At some point, you need to just relax and accept that ENB isn't that good. It's like getting angry at Twitter for being inchoate. You know what you're getting. Just chill.
At some point, you need to just relax and accept that ENB isn’t that good.
Now do Shikha Dalmia.
I bet she gets excited if you talk about imaginary lines on a map while you do.
Mexico to US, US to Mexico, US to Canada, Canada to US... she doesn't care as long as you're white.
What? Shikha wasn't that good either. Even as a polemicist she was too nakedly constructing arguments to meet a goal. ENB just has the shit-gig of the Daily Newsletter and that's hard to do, and she doesn't do it particularly well.
Is it hard to do, really?
I mean, she half assed posts a bunch of twitter links and links to stories on this website and couches them in a condescending headline.
WTHF? That *whole* paragraph really doesn't read as nakedly constructing an argument to meet a goal to you?
It's just shy of "Business owner offers service named "The Problem with Customers". Consumers reject shitty offer of shitty service." being spun into "White supremacists lurk behind every corner".
If she'd cited someone getting fired or milkshakes thrown at them or hounded outside their office door and drummed out of the University, I could see *some* parallel, but she doesn't even present that. Instead it's just "Some customers should really shut up and just eat the bugs."
It’s just shy of “Business owner offers service named “The Problem with Customers”. Consumers reject shitty offer of shitty service.” being spun into “White supremacists lurk behind every corner”
Truer words.....
Man, I really used "credence" wrong there. I think I'm writing worse than usual today. I am not a great writer to begin with, but I'm really using big words wrong today. I need to go back to simple English for a bit.
Merriam Webster Dictionary app has a built in vocab test from Easy to Devilish which may refresh your diction
How the fuck any reasonable person thinking that a class called "The Problem with Whiteness" is something that should be indulged as an intellectual exercise doesn't even compute. Leaving aside the "just imagine if black people were the targets" argument, which these fuckheads don't care about anyway because of their "systemic racism" dogmas, specifically singling out a race as a "problem" is nothoing more than eliminationism with a mortarboard.
If you don't want your kids to come out of college hating themselves and everyone else, don't send them to college in the first place.
Meanwhile, many big companies are suspending Twitter ad buys.
Twitter has ads?
Elon has said he will name these companies. I hope he does so.
Shaming companies that don’t advertise with your company is a great strategy for selling advertising!
About as good as refusing to accept advertising from one political party.
How is it shaming if he is telling everyone how good and virtuous they are by not advertising in Twitter because of antisemitism?
Gee, I hope he doesn't run Twitter into the ground. Wherever will we go to spread our 140 character bon mots?
160
It was the most important thing in the world for all people to be able to make those tweets without any censorship when Twitter was run by liberals. Now, it's suddenly unimportant.
If it hurts your lefty friends, it's automatically good.
Here’s Mike defending left wingers being able to influence who advertises with who, but criticizing others for responding.
Yeah, the last thing consumers need is more information.
2 cases go before the Supreme Court challenging executive courts that act as prosecutor, judge, and jury. Oddly they have near 100% win rates.
https://thefederalist.com/2022/11/07/these-two-scotus-cases-could-put-the-administrative-state-in-its-place/
I thought the Supremes had already ruled against such administrative courts.
But whatever, I have high hopes and low expectations.
Believe it was only for administrative rule making exceeding legal authority. Small step in overturning Chevron.
What even have an untouchable administrative court if you have to listen to the SCOTUS?
You know what they say: just because there's a goalie doesn't mean you can't score.
Had he said this a week ago, it would have had much more of a negative impact to Team D. Considering Senator Manchin's reaction, I am wondering how long it is before he switches sides.
Given that he is a naive dunce, Manchin will never switch sides.
How did that IRA vote work out for you, Joe?
Poll worker found telling people who to vote for and pre selecting votes for all democrats.
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/democrat-poll-worker-ejected-pre-selecting-straight-dem-ticket-voting-machines-report
Not widespread.
This could be a miscommunication, I wouldn’t jump to any conclusions. Maybe the poll worker misheard the voter's request and selected a straight ticket because that’s what he thought was wanted.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Fuck you, no. I'm sure you'd use this same excuse for someone ripping off an old person's estate because at the level of your excuse it is the same but this has more widespread ramifications.
Ouch.
"Hamilton County election administrator Beth Sheller declined to confirm the poll worker's identity in an interview with Fox News Digital"
Why hide the identity? They'll be charged criminally, right? RIGHT?
James Zhang is his name. Typical run of the mill bastard
OK, I’m pretty sure this just became racist.
The New York Times
@nytimes
·
Follow
President Biden had hoped to preside over a moment of reconciliation after the turmoil of the Trump years. But the fever of polarizing politics has not broken ahead of Tuesday’s midterm elections.
Biden is helpless in this polarization. Ignore what he says or how he acts. It isnt his fault.
And so these are frustrating, even perplexing times for Mr. Biden, who according to confidants had expected the fever of polarizing politics to have broken by now and was surprised that it had not. The presidency he envisioned, one where he presided over a moment of reconciliation, is not the presidency he has gotten. He thought that if he could simply govern well, everything would work out, which in hindsight strikes some around him as shockingly naïve if somewhat endearing.
Why won't they ignore the politicization of the FBI going after their opponents? Why won't they ignore the ineffective policies??
And so these are frustrating, even perplexing times for Mr. Biden
Just like when he is trying to figure out which way to exit a stage.
Just wait, in a few weeks, he still won't be in any way responsible for the side effects (the other kind of) polarization either.
"if he could simply govern well"
He should try that and see if it works.
Along with not further polarizing the political environment. We'll see if his staff take this week's losses, assuming they're as bad as everyone expects them to be at this point, and goes the Bill Clinton route, or the Barack Obama route.
if he could simply govern well”
He should try that and see if it works.
^ WORD!!
This reeks of hagiography. I think it's reasonable to talk about the complexity of politics, but when Biden's actions don't meet his sentiment expressed you have to question whether a known liar is simply lying, or worse, he's truly confused.
Yeah, the only way that makes sense at all is if Biden really has no idea what's going on. If he thinks things should be less polarized now, he has no idea what words have been coming out of his own mouth.
“…. somewhat endearing.”
Lol.
If only our One Folk had rallied behind our One Fuhrer.
The the NYT just reports the news without bias.
All the News that's Fit (snip,snip,snip) to Print.
We need another Red Wedding speech.
Gee, how could portraying your opponents as the opposite of everything that is good and decent possibly lead to more polarization? That's a real stumper.
Which ever Duranty wanna-be hack wrote that, imagine the creepy lighting in his cubicle!
"Democrats' long goodbye to the working class."
LOL
Abandoning the working class and becoming the party of Wall Street, Silicon Valley, multimillionaire movie stars, and billionaires was the smartest thing Democrats ever did.
That's why as a Koch / Reason libertarian I ........ uhhhhhh .........
[clears throat]
Um, so anyway, in 2022 Reason.com benefactor Charles Koch's net worth has increa...
Screw it, I'm done with this ridiculous parody character. I would like to thank Reason.com for its incredibly loose moderation policy, and for giving me so much material to work with for the past 5 years. 🙂
#OBLRetired
(Testing my new name.)
Aw shit, for a second there I thought you might actually be bowing out [phew]!
*slow clap*
Is that your actual name?
Yes.
Sounds like a chick's name.
What's a woman doing in the Reason comment section?
Providing the content we need. Though of course the issue with a long-time parody account dropping the game and starting a new one makes it difficult to verify the person
That’s why we need a blue check. $20 sound good?
Gods work. Well not anymore.
Keep posting Sandra.
Sandra didn’t say anything about abandoning the 20 something non binary schtick.
Sandra, I hope you will continue to enlighten us with anecdotes regarding what you learned in college. Please don’t deprive us of your shared knowledge.
ETA: Also, I hope nobody refers to Sandra as OBL, as that would be dead-naming, and we all know how offensive that can be.
That reminds me. My pronouns are now she / her.
Wow. Thank God you haven't left us. Really feel like I dodged a bullet there.
Hmmm I thought your pronoun was parody God?
Are you hot?
Let’s just say, Sandra is lousy with virginity
D’oh!
Serious question about the whole pronoun business. Are the woke grammatically challenged? If the nominative is He then of course the accusative is Him. If the nominative is She then of course the accusative is Her. If the nominative is They then of course the accusative is Them. I work around people who obsessively list their pronouns, including trans and non-binary peeps and have never seen a He/Her or a She/Him or any They whatsoever who didn’t put Them as the second one. WT actual F is up with the way they formulate all that?!
Well, OK. Once—-and ONLY once—I encountered a They/HurdyGurdyGurdy…but that person actually was from Sweden so I’m not sure that counts…
Bonus points for correctly guessing if I own this shirt?
https://www.amazon.com/Swedish-Chef-Vintage-Motion-Tshirts-Athletic/dp/B07QNV9RQD/ref=mp_s_a_1_3?crid=1RQS3NW6LSE43&keywords=wert+der+ferk+shirt&qid=1667886492&sprefix=wert+%2Caps%2C143&sr=8-3&tag=reasonmagazinea-20
I vote yes.
I also vote yes.
I’m voting yes as well, just like Utkonos and Utk…. DOH!!! These votes are supposed to be under three different names! Man, I am SO not prepared for tomorrow!!!
Are you doxxing yourself?
ENB will be along to do that any day now
I don’t recall any sandwich references in an OBL post.
Any particular urge to continue posting what Buttplug previous said in response to whatever he's saying today?
Are you transitioning?
Who will guide us now?
Nooooooooo!
Say it ain't so.
Someone hacked OBL’s account.
Nope. I realized that no matter what happens in the midterms Biden will still be Prez. So I'd just do the same pro-Biden Democrat hack routine in 2023 - 2024 as I did from 2021 - 2022.
Didn't see the need to continue.
nothing gold can stay lol.
The OBL parody style is very very effective at pointing out the hypocrisy / lies / deceit / gaslighting / insanity of leftist shills.
I will miss it. Hopefully you keep calling them out, if not in a parody type way.
I am amazed at how well the account shifted with the times while staying true to its founding charter.
Still not entirely sure Sandra is the old OBL, it will take a while to sink in. Assuming it is true, Well Done!
#OBLWasAlwaysBestWhenGoingOffTheImmigrationScript.
Oh but OBL is so awesome. Please don't deprive us of it. You are a genius Sandra.
> #OBLRetired
REEEEEEEEEEEEEE!
Now even OBL is gone. The Biden era is the worst era ever.
With ENB above, why do we even need parody? Reason's sex editor has gone well beyond parody and satire into that place where the Babylon Bee becomes reality.
With ENB above, why do we even need parody?
Like the Babylon Bee, OBL always served as a leftist narrative crystal ball. I could always get next week's talking points today by paying attention to she/her posts.
I, for one, would like to thank you for the parody character OBL. It made me laugh my ass off some days. It was a beautiful thing.
Now I know why there were so many posts today.
Damn.
OBL....Please do not retire. Go back to work. You've been comedy gold for a while now.
Well, so long OBL, and OBL's spot-on satire. Nothing good lasts forever in this changable world.
OBL/Sandra 2024!
Sandra, my sincere thanks for your great posts these past few years.
A single manly tear will be shed in your honor.
If this is truly the retirement of the bit, I must say I have thoroughly enjoyed your content for the past 5 years. I trust that all of your trademarked ideas such as OBL's First Law™ will retain their original branding, as Sandra's First Law® just doesn't have the same ring.
Thanks for the laughs!
It's like a superhero has been unmasked. A doff of the cap, a deep bow, and very many thanks to you, Sandra.
Put this parody character up alongside long-lost poasting legends like J Sub D, john, and Agile Cyborg.
Thanks for the fun! Of course the charade was tedious and obnoxious much of the time, but so many lampoons were comedy gold. I probably got more of a chuckle out of the times the mask slipped a bit too much.
It would be amazing if Reason gave an interview or allowed a guest article. The criticisms are absolutely necessary if the publication wants to regain any sense of integrity
If reason was business savvy they would hire Sandra for a weekly column.
"Neither Democrats Nor Republicans Have a Clear Advantage Going Into Election Day"
HAHAHAHAHAHA!!! LOLOLOLOLOL!!!
Fortifications may fail.
Republicans may receive votes beyond the threshhold of cheating...
this is my hope
“Fortifications May fail.”
Where’s a Rampart when you need one?
fixed
Lol, I see you had to edit your shitpost because you still can't figure out basic HTML markup... as a professional expert-level computer software engineer.
Tier 2 helpdesk*
If they are that fucking stupid, they were going to vote for Democrats anyway. Assuming they can even find their way to the precinct, or the drop in ballot box. You know all the "voter suppression" stuff. It could only be eliminated if some smart persons were empowered to do it all for them.
I am actually amazed ENB found a way to cite every left leaning polling agency while ignoring groups like Trafalgar Group that have been more accurate the last few years. She is also citing national polls instead if race specific polls.
Even in the national polls the GOP is showing an advantage with independents in the double digits, meaning the polls cited are skewed to democrats as their polling bias using predicted voting patterns.
Generally these polls under sample gop support by around 3 points.
Keep up hope though Enb.
IBD/TIPPS is quite good for polling.
Well, that the problem with whiteness.
"Conservatives of late have imagined themselves the defenders of academic freedom. But as recent right-wing enthusiasm for book bans, laws limiting how teachers talk about subjects like race and gender, and campaigns like this show, much of the right is still plenty happy to limit academic freedom when it challenges their worldview."
ENB's literally complaining that racism won't be taught and is inferring bigotry broadens horizons.
She's so gross.
Skin color is the most important thing
In some rape fantasies, definitely.
She's pointing out the irony in conservatives being the censors when that's traditionally been done by the left.
And no that doesn't mean someone pointing this out agrees 100% with whatever it is the conservatives are censoring, though I'm 100% positive you will insist that to be the case.
Yes, it's censorship to ban fluidentity mutilation. It's censorship to ban porn in kindergarten. It's censorship to ban classes pushing racism.
Go ahead, mute me again, you censorious asshat.
That whooshing noise was my point flying over your head.
How convenient that you claim to be simultaneously serious and sarcastic while being neither.
Let me ask you this. Are you fine with classes being supportively taught on Nazi Race Theory? Because that’s exactly what they were teaching, just with some of the races positions switched. But ENB is pretending it was a legitimate line of scientific social theory.
I’m anti-censorship, but it’s not hypocrisy to still be against publicly funded institutions using funding to promote subjects like racism, pedophilia and classism.
If they want to teach race hate they should do it without public financial support.
It's also important to note that conservatives protested the class, they didn't close it. The university did that, so ENB is misrepresenting the situation.
But ENB is pretending it was a legitimate line of scientific social theory.
Right on cue you insist that anyone pointing out censorship agrees with what is being censored.
What is the censorship? Words have meanings and definitions. The college responded to outrage, they pulled it themselves. A separate entity did not ban the class. There was no law. There was no threat of accreditation being pulled. It was pulled due to market response.
Guess I will add censorship to the long list of words you dont know.
Explain how conservatives “censored” anything. They didn’t pull the racist course, they just bitched about it.
Also, you obviously didn't get past my first sentence. It's too early for drinking, sarc.
Didn't take you long to stoop to personal attacks.
Don't evade. Explain how conservatives “censored” anything.
The same way the leftists didn't?
And what the hell are you on about, Shrike?
How about you. Explain how conservatives “censored” anything.
Didn't take you long to cry like a pathetic little whining bitch, you drunken piece of shit. Fucked your daughter lately? Oh wait, your "cunt" wife got her in the divorce.
It's like James Lindsay getting me in kamf published, and got an award for it. All he did was replace jews with patriarchy, and ayrian with feminists
What law was passed to terminate this class dummy? Consumer outrage to pull a product is not censorship but a market reaction.
It's only a market reaction when every financial institution, ISP, domain registrar, payment processor, hosting provider, social media site, and software distribution platform simultaneously closes your accounts and refuses to do business with you all within the same day. When white people complaint to the dean about being compelled to attend a racist class castigating them as defective because of their skin color that's censorship.
Yeah, she's upset that evil racist fascists are trying to eliminate promotion of evil racist fascism.
The University of Chicago is a small white island surrounded by a large black sea, and that's a problem.
The University of Chicago canceled a class called "The Problem of Whiteness" after conservative students and activists complained. Conservatives of late have imagined themselves the defenders of academic freedom. But as recent right-wing enthusiasm for book bans, laws limiting how teachers talk about subjects like race and gender, and campaigns like this show, much of the right is still plenty happy to limit academic freedom when it challenges their worldview.
Just curious. Would ENB support public dollars going to this class if it was labeled with other adjectives?
She's also lying by inferring that conservatives closed the class instead of merely shining a light on it.
Exactly my response above. They pulled the class in response to people raising concerns. It wasn't forced to pull the class.
But listening to "those people" is not the same as listening to the right people, therefore the anti-antiracists win.
Is lying by inferring worse than lying by implying?
Splitting hairs, SoCkSoCkPeDo?
Lying is lying, Shrike.
Like
The Problem of White Hispanics
The Problem of White Supremist Blacks
The Problem of White Adjacent Asians
The Problem of White Cockroach Women.
"Attack of the 50 Foot Suburban Cockroach Women!"
Party in the back
https://tinyurl.com/5rvaj2u6
That really is a 50 foot white Suburban cockroach... Hunh.
“…..when it challenges their worldview.”
Just dripping with virtue signaling.
Audience member and Sarah Lawrence College student Vivian Lipson held up a white bra with 'Joe Biden' written in black sharpie on each of the cups at the president's rally on her college's campus on Sunday, November 6
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11397113/Biden-says-no-drilling-stumbles-interrupted-heckler-campaign-Kathy-Hochul.html
No surprise her armpits are hairy.
No surprise her armpits are hairy.
Given the context and a name like 'Vivian Lipson', I'm surprised her upper lip, ears, and 3 of the 4 moles on two separate chins aren't hairy too.
Did she get Biden to smell her armpit hair?
(apologies for that mental picture)
He doesn't sniff anyone old enough to have armpit hair.
Film at Never, please
Sorry, I’m NOT clicking that link!
Once again, ENB is propagandizing (i.e. spreading lies) in an eleventh hour attempt to help left wing carbon banning Democrats keep control of US Congress, and many state governments.
Average nationwide polling data is totally useless in predicting winners or losers in hundreds of different races in 50 different states, hundreds of Congressional districts, and thousands of state legislative districts.
The only thing that might prevent a huge Red Wave tomorrow is if lots of clueless folks vote for Libertarian Party spoiler candidates, which could help some left wing Democrats eek out tiny victories.
The sad part is she thinks her posts have that much influence. Goes right along with the woke crowd thinking they are popular.
The only way Democrats can keep control of the US Senate is if Democrat operatives engage in massive voter fraud, just as may have occurred in 2020.
^Bingo
we all remember when the polls said that hillary would win in a landslide. the polls always lean left. so if a polls shows a republican ahead or even tied it means that the republican is really ahead by a lot more.
You wait until the discrepancies in report times. The urban districts will all wait for a day to report after the suburban and rural vote tallies are in.
Twitter's snowflake-in-chief. After promising to make Twitter more friendly to free speech and comedy and pledging to do away with permanent suspensions, new Twitter head Elon Musk changed his tune when faced with people poking fun at him. In response to some comedians impersonating him in a mocking—but clearly not-actually-him—way on Twitter, Musk declared yesterday: "Going forward, any Twitter handles engaging in impersonation without clearly specifying 'parody' will be permanently suspended."
Twitter has always had a rule against impersonation not marked parody, especially for blue checks considered verified.
Do you know what verified means ENB?
It means she should cry more. Tough shit for her and the other progressives that the rules are going to be enforced against them as well.
Twitter's snowflake-in-chief. After promising to make Twitter more friendly to free speech and comedy and pledging to do away with permanent suspensions, new Twitter head Elon Musk changed his tune when faced with people poking fun at him. In response to some comedians impersonating him in a mocking—but clearly not-actually-him—way on Twitter, Musk declared yesterday: "Going forward, any Twitter handles engaging in impersonation without clearly specifying 'parody' will be permanently suspended."
ENB, you are a disingenuous shit. This has always been a part of Twitter's TOS.
https://help.twitter.com/en/rules-and-policies/twitter-impersonation-and-deceptive-identities-policy
You may not impersonate individuals, groups, or organizations to mislead, confuse, or deceive others, nor use a fake identity in a manner that disrupts the experience of others on Twitter.
We prohibit the following behaviors under this policy:
Impersonation
You can’t pose as an existing person, group, or organization in a confusing or deceptive manner.
It's right there, at the link, in black and white.
They even used this policy to suspend mini AOC despite being marked as parody.
THAT'S DIFFERENT!
democrats (enb) are not the part of truth. truth is not a leftwing value so this is completely expected.
Old-fashioned objective truth is racist!
There's nothing in that policy that says, "without clearly specifying 'parody'". That is a new requirement, imposed by Lonnie because reasons.
Obviously, when the user's actual Twitter handle ("@whatever") is clearly visible in the handle field, no one with a brain would be "misled", "confused" or "deceived".
It still violates the policy, if you bothered to read it, Shrike. Of course, you never do read the entire link.
I couldn't care less about Twitter, but the policy does not, as I said, require clear specification of "parody".
This whole Twitter thing has the vibe of a high school newspaper. Mean girls pissed because the editor isn't running the paper the way they want it, and this is all they have in life.
All the while, most of the students not giving a fuck because they'd rather watch a football game, or go to a party to drink beer and maybe some some weed.
King Canutesaq! Is that you?! 😀
Public service anouncement for all readers, Dont do that. Drinking weed sucks. Better to smoke it or use it as an edible.
Hrm. Now I'm wondering if one could get THC to go into solution in cream in the way one can with butter, without breaking the cream. Stonershakes. WEED ICE CREAM.
I spent years wishing for an edit button, and now, I don't use it.
"Scores of pre-election lawsuits have been filed in battleground states ahead of Tuesday's election," reports CNN. "Much of the current litigation focuses on the processes surrounding how votes are cast and counted—with some lawsuits seizing on the same debunked conspiracy theories about election fraud that propelled the court efforts to overturn the 2020 election."
Debunked? 2 dozen court cases have ruled on illegal election changes for 2020. Democrats have continued violating state election laws. These are not conspiracy theories dumbass.
Debunked. Trump & Co. lost 62 out of 63 election fraud cases filed after the 2020 election.
But you knew that.
No they didn’t. How fucking dumb are you? I’ve provided the numbers before. Vast majority he lost were on standing or mootness, not merits. The ones on merit he won 30+%
Then there again the 2 dozen cases since about illegal election changes.
https://redstate.com/stu-in-sd/2021/02/03/2020-presidential-election-lawsuits-the-facts-n320913
The details above.
Youre an uninformed retard shrike.
"Going forward, any Twitter handles engaging in impersonation without clearly specifying 'parody' will be permanently suspended."
That makes sense. I can't go around pretending to be Abrams or Biden, unless I indicate that I'm not either.
I understand that all your friends are full on Spacemanbad, ENB, but I don't see what's "snowflake" about specifying you're not the real person.
Yet you're 100% fine with impersonations on this forum. Why is that?
Do you have a citation for your claim? I mean your buddy White Mike admitted to doing it. Yet you support him.
Your ability to say things that are completely dishonest is really amazing, though one of these days you'll fuck up and say something truthful.
You used to switch nicks all the time, you hypocritical fuck. The fact that using the "mute user" button on "sarcasmic" in old threads will hide a half dozen names is proof of that.
I have never switched nicks. Ever. This is the part where you call me a liar for disagreeing with what you say about me.
I'm still waiting on the citation of your initial assertion.
Go away, gnat.
So not citation? Meaning you lied? You again do what you accuse others of.
Yeah, you have you lying piece of shit. You have admitted to it several times, and on top of that you've also accidentally outed almost all of your socks because you're a moronic alcoholic who can't keep his browser windows straight and routinely copy and paste between your socks accidentally.
And no, that's proof that someone was impersonating me and others.
Tulpa bragged about it. Or are you going to insist that didn't happen?
It was funny as hell, but do you really want to go on record right now that you weren't doing it yourself?
Why would I impersonate myself? Yeah I'm going on record. You and your girlfriends will have a lot of fun with that since you know what I think and do, and whenever what I say deviates from your narrative then you insist I'm lying.
Don't get cute, you stupid fuck. You were impersonating others and you know it.
I never once changed my nick. Ever. I know you can't believe that because it goes against the narrative, but it's the truth.
Thing is, I can't. Years ago I forgot the password for the email I used to create the account, so I can't change anything on it because that requires responding to a confirmation email. I literally cannot change the nick on my account.
I like how sarc is careful to say he never changed his nick which doesn't exclude creating sock accounts.
Hey, remember how you started adding whitespace to other people's nicks to "prove" that you were "hacked" on one of the numerous occasions when you spent 18 hours drunk-posting and then sobered up and realized what a colossal fuckup and piece of shit you are and had to lie to cover it up?
See, it's funny, because you constantly fucking lie, loud, proud, and in public and then lie about the lies you told because you're such a stupid, drunken, troglodytic piece of shit that you can't keep them straight in your own gutrot-addled head.
"remember how you started adding whitespace to other people’s nicks to “prove” that you were “hacked” on one of the numerous occasions"
He remembers, but he's a dishonest fuck so he's going to pretend.
If you go to past threads and highlight "sarcasmic" you will find a lot of them are "sarcasmic " or something similar. Remember when I pointed that out and you insisted I was doing it myself? Yeah, you're all for impersonations as long as you don't like the person being impersonated. No principles at all.
You were posting shitfaced and then pretending it wasn't you. The mute button shows it was though.
The space in the name proves it wasn’t. But you will never accept that because it would mean you were wrong, and you're not man enough to admit to being wrong.
Oh yeah, your hairspace debacle. The mute button says otherwise.
It shows the other names Tulpa was impersonating.
What I don’t get is why you insist it was me even after Tulpa bragged about it. You’ve got someone saying “It wasn’t me” and someone saying “It was meeee” and you insist the latter is the liar. Well I do understand. You don’t care what the truth is. You just like to say lies about me to get a reaction and impress your girlfriends.
Tulpa never said anything of the kind. And since you accuse me of being Tulpa multiple times a week, it's fucking hilarious that you're incredulous someone doesn't believe you. It's even more hilarious because you're a known and proven liar.
Also, I'm glad you're trying to start shit with me today. I was in a pissy mood.
What did I say that was dishonest? I also noticed no citation.
Mike literally admitted to doing it to teach “Tulpa” a lesson.
I know I have that link saved somewhere. I just have to find it.
Self-awareness and memory are definitely not sarcasmic's superpowers.
Mike stole my nick for a bit too.
And mine.
Also sarc still has no citation for anyone here supporting cloning names.
I hate people that steal usr names
ISWYDT
Carry on!
Utkonos, do you have a citation that shows that you saw what he did there, or are you just trying to fit in with your tribe?
I’d like to see you try that stunt on Twitter—and that’s the truth, son!
Oh yeah, and here’s your cite:
OrfOrf.com
didn't work.
Here is his Citation.
https://www.flickr.com/photos/194775987@N02/52474593967/
It's just a coincidence they drive the same car.
Color me shocked if it runs.
I quite like "Spacemanbad". 😀
Is this a sign of early-onset EDS?
ENB is terrified at the prospect of having to be weened off of that sweet censorship she craves.
As long as we can keep divided government we wont be so bad off
Right ENB, you're trying to cover for Team Blue. Why don't you just go work for Vox already?
This is from Politico, which does lean Democratic:
https://www.politico.com/news/2022/11/07/election-forecast-gop-near-house-majority-00065356
The final forecast lists six “Toss Up” races, one more than two years ago. But because four of those seats are currently held by Democrats and two by Republicans, it’s fair to describe the GOP as a slim favorite. If the two parties split those six seats evenly, Republicans will win a 51-49 majority.
Indeed, we would narrowly favor Republicans to win in Nevada and Wisconsin, though both races remain extremely tight. Republican Adam Laxalt is ahead in GOP-commissioned polling, though independent surveys still give Democratic Sen. Catherine Cortez Masto a chance. In Wisconsin, GOP Sen. Ron Johnson jumped out to a lead earlier this fall, but the final polls suggest that Democrat Mandela Barnes remains in contention.
The current breakdown of the House (allocating vacant seats to the party that last won them) is 222 Democrats and 213 Republicans. Even if Republicans fail to win any of the 26 “Toss Up” races — just 2 of the 26 would give them the majority — they are currently projected to gain 3 seats. An even, 50-50 split of the “Toss Up” districts would translate to a 16-seat Republican gain.
A GOP sweep of those “Toss Up” races would represent a gain of nearly 30 seats, and it’s not unusual for one party to win the lion’s share of competitive contests. In 2020, Republicans won 26 of the 27 seats rated as “Toss Up” by POLITICO. In 2018, Democrats won 15 of POLITICO’s 22 “Toss Up” contests in their 40-seat wave election.
The most recent district to shift into the red column is in California’s Central Valley, where Republicans are now favored to pick up an open seat that Biden would’ve carried by 11 percentage points in 2020. It’s another example of Democrats’ struggles in blue states — especially in seats without an incumbent on the ballot.
Neither Wisconsin nor Nevada are close. Those are almost sure Republican wins, especially Wisconsin. Note, the best Politico can say about the Democrat in Wisconsin is "he is still in contention". Yeah aren't we all.
I think Warnock's slum lord scandal has finished him off. I bet Walker wins 50% and doesn't even have to do a runoff. Lurch is done in Pennsylvania. Even the Philadelphia fraud machine wont' save him. The Democrats best chance is Kelly holding on in Arizona. The Republican floor is 52 and their ceiling is 55. They could win in Arizona, New Hampshire, and Washington all three.
Masters surged after Victor dropped and endorsed him.
I think Masters will win too. I don't think Wisconsin should even be on the board as competitive. I think the Republicans win Georgia, Arizona, Pennsylvania, and Nevada all four. That is 53 seats right there. Then they have a good shot in both New Hampshire and Washington. If it is a real blow out, they end up with 55 seats or maybe more if there is a miracle in Connecticut or Colorado, which is unlikely but possible.
Briggs, I don't think PA is quite in the bag, but POTUS Biden talking about stopping all drilling does not help Fetterman at all. To me, it is very, very close and still favors Fetterman. There are already 500K+ mail-in ballots for Fetterman...he has a pretty big lead heading into election day.
Weather will be good tomorrow in PA.
I have a hard time believing a Libertarian candidate has impact either way.
Masters polling jumped 1.5 the week victor posted his announcement and endorsement.
Kelly has stayed a flat 45% for a while now. Usually a death knell for incumbents.
Since the Libertarian US Senate candidate in AZ (who was polling at 6%) dropped out of the race last week and endorsed Blake Masters, most of his supporters will likely vote for Masters as well.
“The University of Chicago canceled a class called “The Problem of Whiteness” after conservative students and activists complained. ”
Oh jeez what a shame. I bet they are going to keep teaching their “The Problem of Blackness” courses too. Unbelievable.
In a way, they are certain to keep teaching about problems of blackness. What do you think all those grievance studies classes teach?
Different tone to those classes.
Haha.
None of which means anything when it comes to predicting who will win each individual race, which is all that really matters. A national poll is pointless.
Is Brown so stupid she doesn't understand that or is she just that desperate to put up something that isn't negative about the Democrats' election chances she is willing to say something that obviously stupid?
Desperate and disingenuous.
The journolist talking points for Wednesday must be along the lines of "the Democrats got more total votes nationally and therefore the Republican majorities are illegitimate.
Plus Russian meddling. I have already seen a few complaints published.
+ gerrymandering, especially the senate races.
Don't forget the gerrymandering for governor's races as well.
Fuck those bastards who gerrymandered that Texas governor's race. What in Sam Houston was that all about?
*dons tinfoil hat* It could be that we’re seeing this narrative that the R’s and D’s are in a virtual dead heat come out now, on the eve of the election, for
twothree reasons:1. They’re desperately trying to give potential D voters hope so that they’ll go vote instead of staying in and doing laundry or watching Netflix or some shit. E.g. “Go out and vote! It’s not as hopeless as we all thought!”
2. They’re getting ready to run their own version of the “sToLeN eLeKsHuN” playbook. They’ll point to these polls as “proof” that the GOP shouldn’t have picked up as many seats as they did so they obviously cheated somehow (because election denial is only bad when the other side does it).
3. Edit: Just thought of a third possibility: the fix is in and they'll point to these polls as proof that the GOP never really had a large lead and anyone who thinks otherwise is a dirty, filthy "elekshun denyer" (because again, it's only a bad thing when the other side does it).
*doffs tinfoil hat*
The fix is not in. It might be in for one or two senate races but that is it. And even those might be beyond the margin of fraud.
Yeah, to clarify, the three options are in descending order of likeliness. Option 1 is the most likely, in fact I don't think you really need to have your tinfoil hat on all that tight for that one to be believable, then 2, then 3 which I'll admit, you've got have your tinfoil hat strapped on pretty tight to believe that one. But it occurred to me right after I originally posted the comment, and I believe in being thorough when engaging in blatant conspiracy theorizing.
the fix is in...
The fix is in, but not to the extent that they need to get a "draw" or a win. Many of the states they need Fortified have taken steps to clean up their election procedures, and many others have (possibly) swung far enough that their Fortifications won't be enough. Democrats' dirty tricks have probably saved them 10 or so seats in the House and maybe a Senate seat, but I don't think that will be enough to stem the tide.
Fourth possibility: they did a poll, and that’s the results they got.
Sure. They polled the newsroom, friends at a recent party, and the hipster coffee shop crowd across the street.
They forgot to dial 9 to get an outside line.
That made me genuinely laugh out loud.
A fourth possibility, one that I attest to, is this article is thrown together quickly each day and isn't well researched or well thought out. Election politics are not what ENB is familiar with, and so, like many days, a lot of this information is just collected from her Twitter feed and rebroadcast.
And to be fair to her, election politics are fucking boring. I hate this time of the year, it's all boring hypotheticals and moving around margins of errors. It's sports betting for nerds.
a lot of this information is just collected from her Twitter feed and rebroadcast
In other words, it's the leftist narrative du jour, leading to the same question just with ENB's name removed.
That is all the morning roundup is meant to be.
That is all jeff and Mike posts are as well. Uninformed leftist drivel.
Also, historically, if Dems had less than 3 or 4 point lead on the national generic ballot --- they got slaughtered.
As has been asked elsewhere: When have polls ever OVERESTIMATED Republican votes? They do so with Democrat votes with consistent regularity.
I live in Maryland Virginia media market. I had not seen a single political ad all fall until last night. Last night on the Chiefs Titans games well over half of the commercials were Democratic ads. They all had the same "oh my God they are going to take your abortion rights and are election deniers" message. For the Democrats to spend the money it takes to do that big of a prime time ad dump in an NFL game in the DC/MD/NOVA market this late in the campaign, tells me they are in a lot of trouble. No way should they be spending that kind of money in a media market that is normally somewhere left of Trotsky.
Second, you can't overstate how pathetic their message is. People who are using their credit cards to pay for their electric bill and groceries don't give a f*ck about abortion or January 6th. Anyone in this area who cares about those things would vote Democrat no matter what. I think the Democrats would be better off saying nothing than running the ads they have. All the ads are doing is telling the voters, "we couldn't care less about your life or any of your concerns and only care about culture war b.s."
All the ads are doing is telling the voters, “we couldn’t care less about your life or any of your concerns and only care about culture war b.s.”
^This^
They're doing pretty much the same thing here in CO, and I assume it's probably the same elsewhere. I can't help but think they're just preaching to the choir, but at the same time I can't entirely blame them. They have nothing else. It's not like they can run on the success of their economic policies.
Be fair. Progressives by definition are focused on a future vision. Judging them based on their past record is unfair.
#StopLivingInThePast
#LetItGoAlready
(Does anyone know if #MoveOn is already taken?)
And this is why I don't pay for cable TV in Colorado. It's bad enough that they stuffed my mailbox with a metric fuck ton of ad's this cycle for all the props.
Same in Spokane WA last night. Every other commercial was Murray supporters slinging all the dog whistles. Trump, abortion, tax cuts for millionaires, and J6. I don't think Eastern Washington residents care about any of that.
Fortification stalled:
https://6abc.com/pennslyvania-mail-in-ballots-pa-election-2022-midterm-supreme-court/12409385/
Pennsylvania officials cannot count votes from mail-in or absentee ballots that lack accurate, handwritten dates on their return envelopes, the state Supreme Court ruled unanimously Tuesday, a week before tabulation will begin in races for governor, the U.S. Senate and the state Legislature.
Here is the thing about PA. They got rid of universal mail in ballots. You have to request a mail in ballot if you want one. In 2020, everyone got a mail in ballot. So, the Democratic machine in Philadelphia had pretty much an unlimited supply of names from which to print fake mail in ballots. This year they don't. Democrats are generally COVIDiots and love their mail in ballots. So, the majority of mail in ballot requests come from Democrats. The number of requests from Democrats in Philadelphia is way low, like 146,000 or something. So, I don't think the Philly printing presses are going to be able to save Lurch like they did Biden in 20.
How many “fake ballots” did the courts actually find they had printed in 2020? Zero?
You’re implying that there was an investigation or a ruling. There wasn’t.
You’re so shit at your job, Shrike. You don’t deserve fifty-cents.
Not a single one of those cases was decided on the merits. But you keep lying Shreek. It is who you are.
Philadelphia destroyed their envelopes in violation of state and federal law...
Somehow not attacking the foundation of our democracy.....
As a rough estimate, the Dems gained 400K votes overnight.
The only state that was really out of whack for mail in votes vs in-person votes was Pennsylvania. In most states, the mail-in votes ran about 5 percentage points higher in favor of Dems than the in-person votes. In Pennsylvania it was like they shipped them in from California. Instead of going 55-45 in a toss-up state, they were like 65-35.
The only thing more amazing was that none of the big TV networks called the race the wrong way on Election Night. They all said that the Dems had assured them they expected enough mail-in votes to make up the deficit. Before they were even counted.
And they wouldn't call states for Trump until they absolutely had to, and called states for Biden as soon as polls closed. That's when I realized something fishy was going on.
Pretty hard to determine when the state destroys everything in direct contravention of the law.
ENB has declared these lawsuits 2020 conspiracies.
Democratic county election officials: "Hold my Chardonnay"
More fortification stalled:
https://www.heraldstandard.com/elections_ap/wisconsin-courts-wont-change-rules-for-absentee-ballots/article_870188f0-b981-574c-b573-16e9da742a08.html
A Wisconsin appeals court and a circuit judge this week shot down attempts backed by liberals seeking orders that local election clerks must accept absentee ballots that contain partial addresses of witnesses.
They'll point to things like this and the other one you linked to above, along with these bogus polls as "proof" that the GOP stole the midterms. All without a single trace of self awareness.
Reason Rundown
When senility wrecks the narrative.
Biden Shouts "No More Drilling. There is no more drilling!" at New York Rally
"At a rally for New York Governor Kathy Hochul, President Biden shouted, “No more drilling. There is no more drilling! I haven't formed any new drilling.” (Timestamp: 1:32:03)
Biden made his remarks in response to a member of the audience who can be heard saying, “Five more years of offshore drilling! Not in the Atlantic or the Pacific. But in the Antarctic [sic] and off the Gulf of Mexico,” to which Biden says, “That was before I was president. We're trying to work on that, get that done.”
Poor Buttplug.
I have a friend who thinks the Democrats have finally stopped trying to handle Biden and are intentionally letting him disgrace himself because they know they have to get rid of him to have any chance in 24. That makes a lot of sense when you think about it.
But then....you'll have POTUS Heels Up. She is petty, vain and weak. She will get us into war.
Maybe she could go to Moscow and use her special skills.
I think Putin has other mistresses who he likes better. More than likely prettier.
Less insane cackling.
There's also zero chance she refuses to run in 2024 and choosing anybody over a black female will kill the vote of, easily, their single most loyal voting bloc.
Possibly not. She was the first eliminated in the primaries. Also yellow school busses and Venn diagrams aren't even words in Ebonics.
If they run her for President, they will lose to pretty much any generic Republican or even the great satan Trump himself.
She is honestly that unlikable, and I really doubt the DNC would be that utterly stupid.
Then again, who else could they pick at this point? The younger generation of Democrats are so awful it's doubtful they have any kind of appeal outside of the bluest of blue cities. That's why they had to run a geriatric this last time around.
More likely we'll see a return of Hillary, since she's apparently using the Nixon playbook for becoming President. Keep trying enough times, and maybe you'll get lucky.
Sigh, you might be right. She has been increasing her visibility lately.
Isn’t Michelle supposed to be an option?
So, I said above that I hate election politics and this type of sports betting around politics. But I will add a comment here. I'm guessing that after Tuesday we will start to see articles from the larger left publications, like Atlantic and the NYT, calling attention to Biden's mental state.
They need him to be viewed as good to help with the mid-terms, but they will begin to abandon him quickly afterwards. More interesting will be if Reason quickly picks up that line of reasoning as well.
Let us see if I am correct.
Yeah they are already laying the groundwork. There's no way he'll be around in 2024. And Kamala will get primaried out. And as of now they have nobody on the bench.
Michelle Obama. I will be shocked if they don't push her.
It would make sense.
Cancelling "The Problem of Whiteness" is a bad thing? Obviously, schools can teach what they want--but (a) they can be ruthlessly criticized for doing so and (b) schools can think better of racialized instruction.
In other words, people can recognize kookiness when they see it and act accordingly, even if that recognition comes late.
Yeah. It was weird for ENB calling it censorship when no laws were passed to get rid of it. The market rose up, they changed their behavior. That isn't censorship.
Weird, indeed.
Did she call it "censorship"?
She's calling it "editing", Shrike. But you know that already, you kiddie-diddling, disingenuous fucktard.
No, she didn't use that word, either.
Try again?
much of the right is still plenty happy to limit academic freedom when it challenges their worldview.
Yes. Limiting academic freedom meets the definition of censorship. In reality, nobody did anything close to censoring. People complained about the Marxist racebaiting title of the course and the university conceded that it was Marxist racebaiting bullshit and canceled it.
It will still be taught, just under a less directly offensive name.
Obviously, schools can teach what they want...
Not if they're taking taxpayer money to do it.
Additionally, the title of the class alone is clearly hate speech under most definitions espoused by the left and I am fairly sure violates the University's policies.
Reason Rundown
Where ENB gets her narrative.
Biden says Twitter spews lies across the world
"There’s no editors anymore in America. There’s no editors. How do we expect kids to be able to understand what is at stake?"
Substitute "censor" for "editor" and we get to the real point of their rage.
You know who else ranted about the media?
Kanye?
Streisand?
Agnew?
I actually really, really agree we need more editors but I agree that this isn't what he's complaining about. Editors are very useful to teach people how to write, and the general decline of journalists to write and opine well is a problem.
At Reason there are only interns and editors. Self editing is the new thing.
I've been saying this lately, but I really do believe the website could use a little strong editorial. This is less of an issue for magazines with more mature writers, but a lot of the new folks probably need greater editorial review even for Hit-N-Run pieces. It will help them improve as writers, it will help the website produce better work.
I use to write for a news paper. The rule was you Cann never edit yourself
As a fallow journal list, I sea what ewe did their.
The true problem is the shift away from actual reporting and toward activist journalism where they've pre-picked a side and narrative beforehand. From this bias even an editor will help because they would be inducing the bias.
Progressive argumentation basically amounts to issuing long series of definitive statements involving highly arguable and subjective assumptions that are treated as already decided and beyond the point of reasonable disagreement. It's as though the argument already happened, the progressive viewpoint conclusively won, and the "argument" is just laying out the victorious conclusions for everyone else. If you disagree, you're not just mistaken, you're also a bigot and a fascist. Nearly all progressive opinion journalism follows this model. An editor can't help with that.
Reason Rundown
Stacey Abrams explaining her poll numbers:
"Unfortunately, this year, black men have been a very targeted population for misinformation. Not misinformation about what they want but about why they want what they deserve."
Also, The following is not an older clip. She just said it:
Stacey Abrams says she wanted small businesses locked down and schools closed for longer: “He prematurely opened the state”
Stacey Abrams says she wanted small businesses locked down and schools closed for longer: “He prematurely opened the state”
Rhetorical question: Is this stupid bitch really dumb enough to think that's a winning message at this point?
Short answer: yes.
I agree. There are plenty of pandemic panic port addicts out there, and even more hyperpartisans who just love the obvious visual virtue signals.
That's what will put Dewine over the top in Ohio.
Question assumes facts not in evidence: Namely that Stacy Abrams thinks.
Stacy Abrams is a great example of the corrupting nature of our national politics. I read a long article about her when she was in the Georgia government before she rose up to be a nation figure. She was liberal, but well liked. She was willing to talk to people, to hear arguments, and to work with folks on the other side. She had a good reputation among those in the Georgia congress.
So, that article could have been a lie, I don't know about Georgia politics, but I think we do see this happen. Relatively reasonable actors are incentivized at a national level to move towards the absurd rhetorical style we have now. That's too bad, and seems to tell us something about what people want from national politics.
Landlords and small business owners are the American kulaks. Her message resonates with her constituency.
Unfortunately, this year, black men have been a very targeted population for misinformation.
Is calling black men stupid just the Georgia Dems' strategy or something?
Going back to form.
Black women see Black men as children who need to be protected. They even openly refer to Black young men as children: https://duckduckgo.com/?q=trayvon+black+child&t=newext&atb=v331-1&ia=web
https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2020/08/18/men-and-women-in-the-u-s-continue-to-differ-in-voter-turnout-rate-party-identification/
https://www.nyclu.org/sites/default/files/Disfranchisement7bw.pdf
Given those numbers, trying to depress the black, male vote further through disinformation is probably not the best application of resources by the cabal. (TINC)
The second Abrams quote is simply evil. Being simple, let’s put it aside and move on to the first quote.
Um…what the HELL was THAT?!?!
Reason Rundown
Speaking of Twitter, your daily schaudenfreude
How did this work out?
They can always just learn to code...
Better yet, they can learn to FOAD.
Neither Democrats nor Republicans have a clear advantage going into election day
Well, it seems Ms. Nolan-Brown is in the first stage of grief, denial. I look forward to her future articles:
Anger - "Frigging Joe Manchin and that turncoat Sinema are to blame!! Damned Republicans are going to usher in A Handmaids Tale!"
Bargaining - "If only we hadn't trumpeted Drag Queen Story Hour and COVID restrictions and just kept things quiet!"
Depression - "America is so over. I'm moving to Canada!"
Acceptance - "OMG! With Joe Biden essentially finished we can get a super awesome candidate for 2024. I wonder if Polis is interested? Or Newsome? Wait, BETO!!"
Can you imagine how dreamy eyed Brown gets at the thought or writing the "Libertarian Case for Newsome" in 24?
ENB: Sploosh!
Well, at least it's not a PornHub link...
Greatest economy ever, eh, Buttplug?
https://www.cnbc.com/2022/11/07/chinas-exports-shrink-in-october-badly-missing-expectations-for-growth.html
China’s exports unexpectedly fell in October, with a drop in the value of goods sold to the U.S. and EU, according Chinese customs data released Monday.
China’s exports fell by 0.3% in October from a year ago in U.S.-dollar terms, missing Reuters expectations for a 4.3% increase.
Poor ENB - stumping for democrats to the very end - good riddance honesty!
Well, no shit, Sherlock. I'm shocked to see it in CNN though.
https://www.cnn.com/2022/11/07/world/billionaires-greenhouse-gases-climate-intl/index.html
A billionaire emits a million times more greenhouse gases than the average person, a study has found.
The report published by the British-founded charity Oxfam Monday based its findings on detailed analysis of the investments of 125 of the world’s richest billionaires.
It found that, contrary to average people, the wealthiest individuals’ investments account for up to 70% of their emissions.
“These few billionaires together have ‘investment emissions’ that equal the carbon footprints of entire countries like France, Egypt or Argentina.
The hypocrisy of our globalist gentry class always amazes me.
A more direct link:
https://www.oxfamamerica.org/press/press-releases/a-billionaire-emits-a-million-times-more-greenhouse-gases-than-the-average-person/
And...
The report itself:
https://webassets.oxfamamerica.org/media/documents/bn-carbon-billlionaires-071122-en.pdf?_gl=1*ejwcjw*_ga*MTc0Mzk4MzQzNy4xNjY3ODM3ODYx*_ga_R58YETD6XK*MTY2NzgzNzg2MC4xLjEuMTY2NzgzNzg5MC4zMC4wLjA.
Abstract:
The world’s richest people emit huge and unsustainable amounts of carbon and, unlike ordinary people, 50% to 70% of their emissions result from their investments. New analysis of the investments of 125 of the world’s richest billionaires shows that on average they are emitting 3 million tonnes a year, more than a million times the average for someone in the bottom 90% of humanity. The study also finds billionaire investments in polluting industries such as fossil fuels and cement are double the average for the Standard & Poor 500 group of companies. Billionaires hold extensive stakes in many of the world’s largest and most powerful corporations, which gives them the power to influence the way these companies act. Governments must hold them to account, legislating to compel corporates and investors to reduce carbon emissions, enforcing more stringent reporting requirements and imposing new taxation on wealth and investments in polluting industries.
polluting industries such as fossil fuels and cement are double the average
They are literally advocating to destroy the foundations of American homes and businesses. Meanwhile, just a few years ago, the Chinese built the largest structure ever to exist on the planet out of concrete and steel without protest by these morons. And it didn't even solve their flood control problems.
There's no hypocrisy here. This is basically saying that rich people have productive investments since things like emissions are tied to people doing productive work.
To associate that with hypocrisy is just doing the leg work for the more extreme edge of environmentalism which actively argues that the only true solution to environmental problems is to be less productive.
^ This was literally my first thought.
It found that, contrary to average people, the wealthiest individuals’ investments account for up to 70% of their emissions.
So, yeah, no shit.
Still, only being 70%, that implies they still might be kicking out 300k as much as the average Joe on a personal level.
Unless I've fucked the math up there.
Still, I'm not convinced that CO2 emissions are the end of the world (ha!) on one hand, and on the other it definitely is hypocritical of these sanctimonious assholes to lecture the rest of us about how we need to buy a Chevy Volt so they can have seven G5s.
They’re talking about their ‘investments’ which basically means ‘productive capital’ so it’s so obviously bullshit it doesn’t even bare talking about at any length.
As for CO2, it’s patent bullshit. 170PPM or so is the end of the planet, and it’s been at least as high as 3000PM+ in the past. We’re at around 450PPM. It’s so obvious only a partisan ‘scientist’ could miss it.
"Investment emissions"? Does that mean they are counting all of the emissions of companies they own (or in proportion to their stake in companies)? Aren't most of those emissions already attributed to the customers of the companies?
Double counting is allowed.
They want 99.99% of the population to change their behaviors so the rich won’t have too…
elizabeth is either clueless of in denial. i really can't believe reason printed this garbage. everything shows that a red tsunami is coming tomorrow. the dems are running scared and are either loosing or are tied in deep blue races where they should be ahead. the gop will pickup 30-50 seats in the house and 3-5 in the senate.
She's an early election denier.
LOL, LOL, LOL.....that is funny.
I think Andy Kim beats Healey; not happy about that. 🙁
The Dems are running so scared, they even held rallies with Biden here in Illinois over the weekend, not too far from Chicago. In 2020, we saw no such thing here.
Ehhhhhhhhh I wouldn't be surprised if Republicans fail to take the Senate.
They do have a habit of acting like the Detroit Lions, figuring out how to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory in the second half. If it's any consolation, the Lions did figure out how to beat the Packers yesterday, so anything's possible.
Of the close Senate races, the one where a GOP victory would most surprise me is Pennsylvania. Yup, I honestly expect the stroke victim to win.
I think you're right.
Vote Honest Brain Damage 2022!
And in fairness, perhaps honest brain damage really is better than lying fuckwits.
nope
not when they have the Dparty fist up their rear directing all their actions and makiing all their votes
I expect most people are expecting the governor to appoint his wife as Senator after he retires. If the PA Governor race goes GOP, I dunno what happens.
Whoa, whoa, whoa! We're all trying to have a good time here. No reason to bring the Lions into this.
Democrats' long goodbye to the working class.
The working class's long fuck you to the Democrats.
The working class going Dem has made the Republicans so much more fun than they used to be and the Democrats so much less fun. For all of my life the Republicans have been the political equivalent of the Omegas and the Democrats the Deltas. Now it is the exact opposite, only the Omegas rather than being preppies have purple hair and are "nonbionary" but every but even more conformist and dreary.
"We are not amused" - McConnell and friends
"Democrats' long goodbye to the working class."
Not so much goodbye as redefining status and roles. The working class is still welcome in the Democrat's big tent, but only as hired servants who have to wear masks while the elites chatter unencumbered.
So , like Reason writers at DC cocktail parties.
Another win for Tofurky (and the First Amendment, and common sense).
In another win(?) for free speech, here's the tofurky song.
did you know the Chilis do a Yertle the Turtle song?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GDlznbJxPMg
“We are even more not amused” – McConnell and friends
“Democrats' long goodbye to the working class.”
Democrats being tone deaf about what voters want — shocking!
Don't worry, though. Neither party has a clear advantage.
The donkey party gave the middle finger to the working class 50 years ago, since then, they have been the party of champagne sipping elites, er I mean “Knowledge Class”.
since then, they have been the party of champagne sipping elites, er I mean “Knowledge Class”.
“Knowledge Class?” I think that may be the first time I've seen this term. Please tell me they're stupid, clueless, and tone deaf enough to unironically call themselves that because if so, that's just fucking hilarious.
It’s a more erudite description of what Rev calls “our betters”. Think it was first coined by an urban planner, Richard Florida https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Florida
From the Wikipedia link:
That's a really long way of saying "this motherfucker invented gentrification."
Florida man bad.
I think most of the Knowledge Class maps onto what people called the Pajama Class, i.e. the eager work-from-home group that enjoyed the pandemic lock-downs (and complained simultaneously about those who pushed back and the disruption in "essential" services).
“Knowledge Class”
AKA, people who love science sexually.
Are they the same people who "believe" in science? Cuz we know that the foundation of science is belief.
I don’t think they have totally gone that way. They are still strongly influenced by unions.
I’d say they still ahead an internal power struggle between unions and “Knowledge Class”.
Depends on the state. Here, in Illinois, they are strongly controlled by public employee unions (AFSCME and SEIU) as well as the "knowledge class". It's not really a struggle between them so much as both trying to pull the wool over the eyes of private employee unions.
The knowledge class includes teachers’ and white collar unions. They could care less about the iron workers, pipe fitters, and teamsters unions who stand in the way of their automating their jobs
Knowledge class
I prefer calling it the Bureaucrat class. They're not the smart or knowledgeable people in society, they're the ones that got credentialed in fields artificially created by government regulations.
Even better, the Administrative class.
What was wrong with Nomenklatura? Too old school?
Neither Democrats Nor Republicans Have a Clear Advantage Going Into Election Day
Keep telling yourself that.
AP Exclusive: UN child sex ring left victims but no arrests
https://apnews.com/article/africa-arrests-united-nations-only-on-ap-e6ebc331460345c5abd4f57d77f535c1
In the ruins of a tropical hideaway where jetsetters once sipped rum under the Caribbean sun, the abandoned children tried to make a life for themselves. They begged and scavenged for food, but they never could scrape together enough to beat back the hunger, until the U.N. peacekeepers moved in a few blocks away.
The men who came from a far-away place and spoke a strange language offered the Haitian children cookies and other snacks. Sometimes they gave them a few dollars. But the price was high: The Sri Lankan peacekeepers wanted sex from girls and boys as young as 12.
Reason’s most esteemed economist, the Oracle of Dogshit, Georgia, would be most disappointed he wasn't there.
It's always pedophilia with globalist institutions.
Why are we giving money to the world's largest child prostitution ring?
Because the Clinton's need a new pair of shoes.
https://www.flickr.com/photos/66890686@N02/51124366228/in/dateposted-public/
In the ruins of a tropical hideaway where jetsetters once sipped rum under the Caribbean sun, the abandoned children tried to make a life for themselves
For a second there I thought maybe they were talking about Epstein's island.
Probably another Epstein (TM) resort.
Well, rape and plunder are traditional perks of the job of being a soldier. You hear about this sort of thing a lot in UN peacekeeping ventures. The UN keeps it old school, I guess.
Jeffrey Sachs
@JeffreyASachs
Looks like @UChicago caved to the censors. What a disappointment. You don’t violate academic freedom just because some jackbooted Twitter thug throws a tantrum.
A hardcore leftist who lauds China's techno-authoritarian governmental structure decries censorship.
A hardcore leftist who lauds China’s techno-authoritarian governmental structure decries censorship.
Censorship that isn't really censorship. U of Chicago could have just not caved and kept the class, no one forced them to cancel it. In fact, even though this specific class is cancelled, you can bet that the same class will be taught anyway under a different name. Hell, the same material is probably already included in most of their Victimhood Studies majors.
Be fair. As enrollment and faculty numbers in the grievance studies departments increase, they have to invent more courses.
Speak Bitterness Grievance Struggle Session
Would that fly? It may be odious but it’s way mao honest…
Never forgive, never forget
Opinion Handing out unemployment aid to people who refuse to get vaccinated is silly
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2022/01/02/handing-out-unemployment-aid-people-who-refuse-get-vaccinated-is-silly/
From an economic perspective, it is also bad policy to be giving aid to those who would rather be fired than get vaccinated. The fate of the U.S. economy hinges on getting the coronavirus under control. When cases spike, people stay home and don’t spend as much money, which hurts local businesses and vacation destinations.
Unemployment compensation is supposed to be for workers let go for no fault of their own, such as when a business downsizes during a recession or a factory closes in a town. If someone is fired for cause, they are not supposed to receive unemployment aid. By refusing to get vaccinated, these workers are violating company policy and being fired for cause. Even worse, they are endangering the lives of co-workers and customers.
Somebody loves beating the same broken drum.
Oh dear. The trans community isn't happy with SNL.
Dave Chappelle is hosting.
Can't remember the last time I watched a full episode and that's not gonna change this week.
I honestly don't think I have watched a full episode this century. Yeah, I might watch that one. Even if it isn't funny, the pleasure or sticking it too the "trans community" is worth a hour of bad TV.
The Blue Checks are gonna be pissed come Sunday morning on Twitter. Might have to read their diatribes and laugh my head off.
As for SNL? Nah, they stopped being funny decades ago.
#IsSNLEvenRelevant
SNL is still on?
I usually just watch the monologue if its someone good, on youtube. Burr's was great. Always good when one of their own calls them on their bullshit and ever so briefly interferes with their worldview. I think the best line was:
"And then somehow, white women swung their Gucci-booted feet over the fence of oppression and stuck themselves at the front of the line."
THE EXPERTS HAVE SPOKEN!!!
Should you save a dying stranger if you know they eat MEAT? Oxford philosopher controversially argues that it can be ethical to let them die because of the suffering they cause to animals (and he's not even a vegan!)
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-11389953/Should-save-dying-stranger-know-eat-MEAT.html
Argument stems from the great suffering a meat-eater inflicts on animals in life
Expert says chickens in factory farms suffer for months in tortuous conditions
So the lesser evil could be to let carnivores die in emergencies, the expert claims
Even a promise to convert to veganism might not make them worth saving
The best part of that article is the picture of the little dweeb. He looks like he weigh a buck twenty five soaking wet. I don't think he is going to be saving anyone.
I don't think anyone expects philosophy professors or vegans to save anybody is the first place.
He would need to work out the trolly problem a hundred different ways first, by which time the person experiencing an emergency has conveniently died.
I mean maybe we should stop saving dying COVID-zero tyrants, being that we know next time there is a cold virus they will try to use it to make us take mandatory experimental medicines and unconstitutionally lock people down.
I would say less of those people would be a very big net gain for society, and cause a lot less suffering.
I would like to support your campaign for the presidency, Mr. Jr.
Not surprising. These fuckwits have always been in favor of eugenics, genocide, and any other policy that can give them an excuse to kill or just let people they don't like die.
Hmm, there’s a lot of that going around in both major partisan teams.
You know who else argued for the ethics of helping the "wrong" people die?
Margaret Sanger?
The Governor of New York?
Justin Trudeau?
chemjeff?
+1
Sidney and Beatrice Webb?
Reading the article, this is definitely all one big "what-if" which is what philosophers do.
And, I think he's right. I don't know where his thinking is coming from, but I think he's making an argument that is logically coherent from a lot of recent animal rights logic.
That this should be taken seriously and consider something to give pause to animal rights logic is another matter. If one listens to animal rights folks, and increasingly people take it very seriously at least in the US, then there is no clear delineation between humans and animals and therefore eating meat is a pretty vile act.
There's also a big Utilitarian aspect to this argument, which is a different problem and I think we're reaching the absurd conclusions of utilitarianism anyway. I hope we can ultimately do away with it.
Of course, if one is to engage in that line of reasoning it also becomes a moral imperative to kill all carnivorous animals as long as you don't eat them and do it quickly.
The irony isn't lost on me.
Some animals are more equal than others.
Not like that would fuck up species predator/prey balances or anything.
Right, so inflicting suffering on others justifies their death, what are the odds he applies this to progressive agenda policy and the widespread suffering it causes? By his logic it is better all around to murder progressives than to let them vote again.
While a lot has been said about the outcome, I think one of the most interesting questions to answer will be on turnout. The midterms generally don't get the attention that Presidential election get, and I am looking to see if people are more interested in voting this midterm election. A lot has been said about the outcome, but what if we start to see people more interested in voting. I would think this is a good thing whatever the outcome.
Are the Republicans still shooting themselves in the feet by eschewing convenient voting methods such as mail-in voting?
I don't think they are doing that this year. There is a lot of early voting this year. Republican have been strong early voters and most of the rules supporting early voting in Wisconsin were made by the Republican controlled legislature. With Trump out of the way I think Republican can go back to early voting in good conscience.
I can't remember which Sowell book it was, but one of his assertions was that higher voter turnout was a sign of political instability and often a precursor to conflict in many African nations. Its a good thing when the government doesn't have that much power over your life, and therefore you don't really have to care about it.
More turnout isn't always a good thing.
Obama mused—publicly—about making it mandatory.
“Exercise your right to choose, cuz we’re not giving you a choice!”
I wasn’t planning to vote in my safely blue district, but think I am annoyed enough now with all the team blue hysterics about “democracy” being at stake where I just might vote against them. And the polling place is on my jogging route.
My district went from safely blue to wild card. Sure as hell, I'm going to vote tomorrow.
Your district might not be a safely blue as you think. You never know what people are really doing to do when they vote. I guarantee you there are at least some people who are going to vote Republican but are acting otherwise for fear of retribution by the Prog jackboots.
VA-08 has been blue since 1990, and in the nearly 20 years I’ve lived here, no republican has ever received more than 35%. In other words, hell would freeze over before it flips.
It didn't say it was likely. I just said possible. I bet you whoever the R is gets more than 40% tomorrow.
The last time a republican broke 30% in VA-08 was 2010, the past few elections they have been around 20% here. I don’t expect they will do much better than that this time.
Why so blue?
Mostly lawyers and government employees here
Vienna/Oakton?
Alexandria
It's not Northern Virginia, it's South DC.
I’ve said before a lot of problems could be solved by creating a new state that would include DC, Montgomery and PG counties in Maryland, and the NoVa counties east of Dulles airport and north of the Rappahanock.
What problems would be solved by the creation of 2 added Democrat senators?
I'm not sure VA and possibly even MD wouldn't flop back over R once DC and the surrounding areas were excised.
New narrative in 5.....4.....3....
https://twitter.com/politico/status/1589568452699820032
The 2020 presidential election was rife with allegations of voting machine hacks that were later debunked.
Yet there are real risks that hackers could tunnel into voting equipment and other election infrastructure to try to undermine Tuesday’s vote.
https://twitter.com/JackPosobiec/status/1589643188578680834
BREAKING: Fetterman campaign issues memo warning of a 'long week' for a 'process that takes several days' before results are in - lashes out at Mastriano, Tucker, Trump, Ted Cruz
Thought it was interesting in Biden's speech the other day, when he went on to tell us that if we dare vote for anyone but democrats then we are traitors to democracy (totes something a dictator would never say...), that he did remind everyone that 2020 was the cleanest election in the history of elections.
I would consider that a 'gotcha' when they will go on to say THIS election, with the same processes, machines, etc, will have been hacked by Russia and is suspect.
Of course, this assumes they have a single ounce of self-reflection, integrity, or the ability to feel shame. They will of course happily gaslight as always and pretend we didnt just hear them say it
At least Biden has not called his opponents "cockroaches". Yet.
Maybe on Wednesday?
What’s Election Day? Chopped liver? Magical “No-Biden-Gaffes” Day?
"You are cockroaches. And we will eat you like the cockroaches you are."
Man, this is starting to sound oddly like the "Lizard People" conspiracy theory stuff... 😉
Two wings, six drumsticks and a pair of antennas, Let us give Thanks
For the cockroach reference check out Hotel Rwanda or just look up RTKM Radio.
An Interahamwe reference. Very good, sir!
Can't wait to see Sullum squirm when the Democrats deny the election. Again.
Yep, looks like they’re getting their talking points in line so they can screech “StOlEn ElEkShUn!!!111!111!!!!!!11!!!!” without a trace of irony, shame, or self awareness.
Um, religious zealots don't do irony.
Simon the Zealot was pretty funny actually. A lot of people don't know this, but he invented the Whoopie Cushion.
Anecdotal point here, but the signage around my neighborhood is...interesting.
There is a non-zero number of both Hershel Walker and Kemp signs on Ukraine/BLM row near me. I am legitimately both amazed to see it, and also concerned for their car tires and windows, given how the shrieking blue checks behave when someone steps out of line.
The Walker signs are something I have never seen there. They were 100% Warnock/Ossoff signs last election.
Just something I thought was interesting
Ukraine/BLM row
That is awesome. Few things make me laugh out loud but that did. I love it.
>>Ukraine/BLM row
capital "Row" then trademark this.
I'm going to factor out Ukraine since I have more complicated views on that one.
But even then, I still think I would prefer BLM signage than the "In this house we believe in Science" signs. Man, I hate those so fucking much.
love is not love unless a sign in your yard says so.
Or the "Hate is not welcome here" signs?
Anything that's sloganeering. And those two signs are pure sloganeering. At least BLM is an organization with an agenda. The other two are a fucking bumper sticker.
How about “Love Don’t Live Here Any More?” Oh wait, that’s a song not a sign
Those signs are absolutely on that street, believe that!
One of those signs is in a neighbor’s yard three or four houses down….and it’s THE Science that their house believes in!
That's the way the US election system is supposed to work.
However, this year, it seems like Democrats screwed up and actually go into election day with a substantial disadvantage.
"Looks like
@UChicago
caved to the censors. What a disappointment. You don’t violate academic freedom just because some jackbooted Twitter thug throws a tantrum."
Jeffery Sachs is my go-to guy for unbiased opinion.
Child Rape in Hollywood
https://elizabethnickson.substack.com/p/child-rape-in-hollywood
Most of these girls were so beautiful they were sexualized early. The moment they have a bit of fame, they turn to yachting where they can make a few million every summer. Meghan Markle, Selena Gomez, Hailey Bieber, Bella Hadid, all participated, were invited to lavish yachts where they sleep with billionaires, industry executives, and are paid six figures per night. Howie Mandel’s wife is said to have supplied them out of the cast of Deal or No Deal. Ariana Grande cancelled a concert because a yachting gig would pay her more.
...According to servers at these parties, the attendees are executives at huge corporations, filthy rich, incredibly successful, managing billion dollar companies. They are so rich and powerful that “they do the most inhumane things to feel some sort of rush, the goal is the adrenaline. It’s the power over a child, that makes them feel unstoppable”.
The rape rooms at Disney parties are well known. Buying a young star’s virginity for huge money is better than a limited edition Ferrari. Anyone can buy that.
Epstein and Weinstein were just the tip of the dick here.
I used to discount conspiracy theories about the rich and well-connected being a bunch of pedos. I can't discount them as conspiracy theories so much as they appear to have been spoilers.
It makes sense. These people have no religion or value anything except money and pleasure. The problem with money and status and pleasure is that there is never enough of it. To an average person it might sound great to have your pick of Hollywood actresses as you cast movies but after a while it would lose its thrill. If you have no morals or any commitment to anything beyond money, power, and pleasure, you will go looking for something kinkier and more exclusive. And that usually leads to kids if it involves sex.
You can see this with more ordinary people with child porn. Very few people start out being into child porn. They start out with regular porn and then when the thrill of that wears off end up looking for something kinkier and that inevitably leads to kids. It is not that everyone who looks at porn ends up being into child porn. It is that people who get addicted to the thrill of porn often end up into child porn.
I'm not sure I buy it as being even that abnormal. Isn't this the way members of various aristocracies have behaved basically forever? "Older male Homo sapiens wanting to engage in sexual activity with much younger, recently fertile, female Homo sapiens" actually sounds likely to be the sort of thing that goes back to Homo habilis and beyond.
I'm not saying that we shouldn't attempt to do better, just that I don't find it even slightly shocking.
You are right. Same as it ever was.
If de Sade's work is to be believed, then the answer is a resounding yes, unfortunately. Foucault, pedophile and one of the architects of the current madness, was a huge de Sade fan.
It's always pedophilia with the gentry class.
There was a guy on Twitter for a while who before he was banned said that he was a long time magazine writer in Hollywood and described pretty much the same thing.
I wonder what I'd be like if I was super rich like this? I can't tell if the industry creates this type of person or attracts this type of person?
Like, whatever criticisms I have of Robert Redford's personality, I vibe with the "buying a huge ranch out in the middle of nowhere" goal way more than "rape young girls on a boat."
Yachts and starlets goes back to the Silent era.
https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1997-oct-31-ca-48510-story.html
Hollywood certainly has form since at least the Roman Polanski days, but reviewing the author's other work reveals the usual "WEF/EU/Socialist Internationale/Soros/UN cabal", anti-vax, pro-Putin fact-free ranting.
She'd feel right at home here!
And you'd feel at home on the yachts, Shrike aka SoCkSoCkPeDo.
How did you know I was an aspiring teenage actress?
Still, getting paid "six figures per night" seems a little incredible.
I figured you for Shrike's cock sock. Fap, fap, fap.
It’s been rumored that's how Markle met Harry, and he got so irritated at Prince Phillip telling him that he needed to stop tomcatting around and settle down like William, that he married a yachting hookup that he didn’t even really like as a “fuck you” to Grandpa.
Somehow I can see that. Harry seems to take after his uncle, Andrew.
Oh please, like Harry is actually biologically related to the rest of that lot.
Yes, but Andrew was the one on Epstein's island. The others have shunned him for it, and other past behavior he has done (there's a reason his nickname in the press was "Randy Andy"). If true regarding the yachts, then Harry does take more after him. We do know that Princess Pinocchio leads Harry around by his cock.
What an error on his part. Yikes.
https://twitter.com/ShellenbergerMD/status/1589585377803014146
A 24 year-old woman shut down a major highway in UK just now. She says it’s for the climate but she’s obviously suffering from severe mental distress, narcissism, and grandiosity. “Why does it take young people like me?” she asks.
Climate fanatics are weaponizing mental illness.
"severe mental distress, narcissism, and grandiosity. “Why does it take young people like me?”"
Greta really was the perfect avatar for the insufferable, naive, mentally ill climate activist.
Spoiled rotten kid somewhere far up the Autism scale. There is this myth that mentally disabled kids are all wonderful people. My older sister was disabled and was wonderful but wasn't perfect. And many are great people. They are people, and some are really nasty little bastards, real monsters. Greta was one of those.
Greta Thunberg was trained by her parents to be a child soldier. I don't blame her for that.
^ yup. They indoctrinated her into the religion since birth and fucked up her head. She was brainwashed into thinking this is an existential crisis and the fate of the world depends on her activism.
It's child abuse.
Yes and at first they denied playing any role in Greta’s epiphanies whatsoever. Only later did their own long time activism come to light. Also, in addition to being on the Autism Spectrum , Greta suffers a serious anxiety disorder. She has indeed been abused. She’s also been turned into an insufferably sanctimonious scold. Anyone telling her to her face that she is extremely obnoxious would truly be doing her a kindness.
Her father should be nicknamed "Dr. Frankenstein".
Just one of those?
They are people, and some are really nasty little bastards, real monsters. Greta was one of those.
"How dare you!" /sarc
In a sane world everyone would just ignore the future crazy cat lady, but no, for some reason we have to take the ravings of an autistic lunatic child seriously.
Check back in 30 years.
https://www.flickr.com/photos/66890686@N02/51686573242/in/dateposted-public/
People are people. A good point to learn.
Scoldilocks.
Nice one.
That was inspired.
"This interglacial is too hot! This glacial period is too cold! This interglacial period is just right AND WILL BE FOR ALL TIME!"
I am shamelessly stealing that one; I will give attribution (if I remember). LOL. 🙂
"...“Why does it take young people like me?” she asks..."
When you grow up, you'll know.
Did Schellenberger ever figure out that Depape doesn't live in Berkeley?
Or did he just ignore it, confident that his audience would never notice?
"Climate change talks to test global resolve on warming"
[...]
"Negotiators from almost 200 countries will meet in Germany on Monday for climate talks to reignite momentum on tackling global warming, as Russia's invasion of Ukraine overshadows the threat from rising emissions.
The conference in Bonn will set the stage for a new round of major UN talks later this year in Egypt..."
https://www.thenationalnews.com/world/europe/2022/06/06/climate-change-talks-to-test-global-resolve-on-warming/
Sometimes reality gets in the way of fantasies...
(and let's hope Bonn has enough NG to keep them warm)
major UN talks later this year in Egypt
Egypt should be on the verge of starvation by then.
Maybe they can make a Donner Party out of the UN talk attendees.
Leg of advisor, anyone?
The conference in Bonn will set the stage for a new round of major UN talks later this year in Egypt…
It really is setting the stage for more talking all the way down.
Hey, someone has to fill all those luxury hotels, 3 star Michelin restaurants, $2k per night escorts, and etc. You can't expect the experts to endure something akin to a, say, LNC meeting can you?
Let's hope it doesn't.
(and let’s hope Bonn has enough NG to keep them warm)
Yeah, it would be a real shame if our "betters" were made to feel the least bit uncomfortable.
They might get distracted from their mission to make us feel uncomfortable.
>>Facebook's parent company, Meta, is reportedly planning a huge round of layoffs.
but what does Stephen King think?
As long as the owning billionaire works with/for the DNC or keeps them happy, nothing to see here
“With Facebook It is different. They’re just being Pennywise. Twitter is the real clown show.” -Stephen King
"Going forward, any Twitter handles engaging in impersonation without clearly specifying 'parody' will be permanently suspended."
Wait, wasn't this the worry from the chattering classes if Musk did away with the blue checkmark? Sounds like he's taking earnest steps to moderate in good faith! They should be ecstatic!
I don't know the situation enough to comment, but I've honestly found that more rules that are clearly defined are better for forums then fewer that are applied on a whim. If Twitter is moving in the direction of more, but clearly defined and applied rules, I think that's probably a good thing.
Really, the only real irksome thing with a lot of moderation I see is the vagueness of the application and the lack of transparency as to why. Even if I disagree.
That said, Twitter does not matter that much. It's a localized form of hysteria that we think it does.
Sorry, that lacks context.
"Will Biden and Democrats learn this lesson in a red-wave electoral disaster? It’s easy to think so, but don’t forget who will lose tomorrow in a red-wave scenario. Hint: it’s not going to be the hard-Left progressives, who come from almost impossibly safe House districts and deep-blue states for Senate seats. It will be the centrists that get wiped out, along with the more-Left liberals. The rump Democrat caucuses will be almost entirely hard-Left if not completely so, and will elect leadership that will keep leading their party down the primrose paths that Sullivan outlines so clearly."
https://hotair.com/ed-morrissey/2022/11/07/wsj-poll-the-red-wave-is-real-and-also-black-and-brown-n508672
Too bad. I don't feel bad for centrist democrats, if they even exist anymore. Any centrists left in Congress willingly threw their lots in with the hard left and chose to vote party-line on every piece of shit progressive policy. They deserve to lose their seats.
The centrists clearly failed to moderate their party. If Wokeness is the cancer that caused their death, and the centrists refused to treat it, then imagine how badly they'll lose when they're 100% woke instead of 85% woke?
Years, maybe even decades of losses at the Senate and Presidential levels. A loss of most governorships. It might just be enough to turn the Donkey Party into a party like the Libertarian Party - a minor party.
It's mind blowing how badly any remaining centrists acted against their own self interest. Rabid left progressive policies are not popular with normal people, and normies- especially independents- are a necessary voting block to win elections. How shitty was their internal polling on issues, for them to think that throwing in with the extreme left was a good way to keep their jobs? You expect the hard left progs to live in a bubble of smug, but any centrists should have seen what was coming and started acting in their own self interest a while ago.
This is what 50 years of the center left believing there could never be an enemy on the left causes.
"Neither Democrats Nor Republicans Have a Clear Advantage Going Into Election Day"
Except, you know, all the polls that say otherwise.
JFC. The article alternated paragraphs - one about how it's 50/50 and then one about how the DNC is expecting to lose 20 seats in the House.
ENB is being disingenuous here (as usual). Maybe it's time she found employment at Vox.
Ignore all the bullshit from the pundits. Here's two plain and simple facts:
1) Every single one of the top democrat poohbahs is spending these final hours of the campaign desperately playing defense in the suburbs of........ Chicago, Philadelphia, and New York City.
2) "President" Biden is fleeing America later this week to travel halfway around the world to places like Cambodia and Egypt.
These two facts tell you everything you need to know about the democrats themselves think things are going for them.
Chicago, Philadelphia, and New York City
Don't forget DC.
Why spend so much time and effort in areas that are assumed to vote for Democrats? The only reason I can come up with is that their internal polling for these areas much suck dead penguin balls.
Yep. The president campaigning in Oregon so late in the game - like he did a couple weeks ago - is unheard of.
He must campaign somewhere so a safe district where they can message his statements and ignore his gaffes is the best they can do.
" recent right-wing enthusiasm for book bans"
No one one the right has called for a ban. They have just said that some of these books are either not suitable to be in a *school library* or are at least age-inappropriate for some schools.
That isn't true. There have been efforts on the right to censor certain books from public libraries, not just school libraries.
In some cases, they included books that weren't even present in the public library, which means they were grandstanding.
Public libraries are otherwise known as taxpayer funded libraries. No one owes you their tax money to support your porn habit. A book not being in the public library is not banned, you dishonest fuck.
Now do the liberal firestorms to keep books from being published or marketed. You know, actual bans.
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/conservative-activists-want-ban-400-books-library-arent-even-shelves-rcna44026
"Their list of more than 400 titles predominantly focuses on young adult books with LGBTQ characters, scenes describing sexual activity or invoking the occult.
"The only problem: None of the books are in the library’s collection."
"Still, the activists in this town of 2,500 people wanted the books pre-emptively banned."
Then WTF are you complaining about?
The shill ENB just can’t let go, don’t dream it’s over.
"If you want to get more into the nitty gritty of polling on competitive races, FiveThirtyEight has you covered."
How did they do in 2016?
Oh.
The University of Chicago canceled a class called "The Problem of Whiteness" after conservative students and activists complained. Conservatives of late have imagined themselves the defenders of academic freedom. But as recent right-wing enthusiasm for book bans, laws limiting how teachers talk about subjects like race and gender, and campaigns like this show, much of the right is still plenty happy to limit academic freedom when it challenges their worldview.
Substitute any other race for the word 'Whiteness' in that course name, and tell me it would still be taught / tolerated.
There's a difference between 'book bans' - not that you would know what one is anyway - and deciding not to teach racist bullshit.
You do understand that the term "whiteness" does not stand for "people with white skin", right?
This is what "whiteness" means:
https://nmaahc.si.edu/learn/talking-about-race/topics/whiteness
Object to it all you want, but at least understand what it is you are objecting to.
the day you can define white person come back with this bullshit.
Yeah, it's SO much better to generalize a diverse group of people into a caricature stereotype. You know what we used to call that? Bigotry? Racism?
Well done, Mr. 'Individualist'. Much appreciated.
Tell me, is it racist and bigoted to refer to "Black culture"?
yes. define black. you know you can't. so stop.
Yes? 'Black' people are as diverse as any other group of individuals that you would like to collectivize based on some superficial trait.
What the actual fuck?
Black people fall into two categories
1.The Black people that are on TV ads.
2.The Black people that are on TV news.
Skin color is the most important thing
You do understand that the term “whiteness” does not stand for “people with white skin”, right?
You do understand that even most of your own customers have stopped buying the bullshit you're selling, right?
Of course you don't, you're just here to play retarded.
What is the word or phrase that you would like to give to the phenomenon of "a set of cultural assumptions that are treated as normative"? Do you think this phenomenon is worth studying?
Is your problem here just with the name itself? I agree that calling it "whiteness" is stupid.
No. We think that it's wrong to collectivize people based on any one thing and then ascribe some set of shared attributes and / or RACIAL guilt to them based on biases and stereotypes.
'The problem with Jewishness'
'The problem with Orientals'
'The problem with Hispanicness'
None of that would be acceptable, and it shouldn't be, because it's wrong to view people in that manner. People need to be treated with respect on an individual level and not just assigned to a category.
Jeff, the 'individualist' doubling down on why racist collectivism is necessary. Unironically.
They really think they are the heroes of the story and not the open racists that everyone else can see them for
So, are statistics racist?
Here is the problem with Team Red and Team Blue right now when it comes to race.
Team Blue wants to make everything about race. In their view, most if not all social problems have some racial dimension that must be explored and addressed ad nauseum. And some of the supposed connections to race are, shall we say, tendentious.
Team Red, in totally reactionary fashion, has instead decided to deny that race is relevant AT ALL. Not only is Team Blue wrong about making everything about race, instead, NOTHING is about race. The Civil Rights Act solved all racial issues and therefore there is no need to ever mention the word ever again, and the only reason why we aren't living in a color-blind utopia right now is because of that nasty Team Blue always bringing it up. That's basically the Team Red position.
In reality both of these extremes are wrong. Not everything is about race, but neither is it true that NOTHING is about race. Refusing to even talk about race ensures that problems that are, at least in part, due to racial discrimination or bigotry never go away. For example, the maternal mortality rate for pregnant Black women is almost three times higher than the rate for all other women.
https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/hestat/maternal-mortality/2020/maternal-mortality-rates-2020.htm
Why is that? Team Blue wants us to believe that the reason is 100% because of racial discrimination. Team Red wants us to believe that the reason has absolutely nothing to do with race at all. But reality is probably somewhere in the middle.
The right's majority position can be summed up as "yes, we understand history has consequences", and a desire to have the CRA enforced equally.
The left's position can be summed up as demonizing/stereotyping based on race, an unevenly (purposefully) applying rules based on immutable characteristics. AKA, they want to be racist.
Again, I know you all think you are on the correct side of history, but it really isnt going to be kind to you. The fascists and Nazis the left complains about have so much in common with them its scary
What is the word or phrase that you would like to give to the phenomenon of “a set of cultural assumptions that are treated as normative”?
Fiction. You would think someone identifying as an individualist would recognize that a group coalescing around a norm doesn't causally prescribe or enforce the norm to the group, much less any given data point, unless the 'individualist' was just playing stupid.
The issue, as you well know isn't the name. Or even really the content, it's the bad faith presentation and disingenuous disparity in the name of 'equality'.
Right: Uses Twitter like Yelp! to convince local business adding "shit burger" to their menu whether in name, or an actual sandwich containing actual shit, is a bad idea.
Left: Uses actual own feces to write "shit burger" on the wall. Then uses Twitter as over-the-fence propaganda mill to foment outrage about "shit burger" being written on the wall. Then doxxes, harasses, and assaults anyone who dares question "shit burger" narrative after hours, for no credit, at no cost to anyone, in a tangentially university-oriented way for being "shit burger conspiracists". Then goes on to further use Twitter to complain about the brutal oppression of shit burger conspiracists and the normalization of shit burger supremacy.
Again, find another schtick to hock your shit burgers, nobody's buying. Better yet, do yourself and everyone else a favor and stop trying to hock shit burgers altogether.
That might be the single most complete destruction of someone I have ever seen here. Impressive, truly
Jeffy makes it easy. Here is one where he is taken apart so quickly his only defense is to degenerate into a gibbering idiot.
https://reason.com/podcast/2021/10/25/freedom-responsibility-and-coronavirus-policy/?comments=true#comment-9176512
The guy is a $0.50 Marxist shill.
The Bear Analogy was over a year ago?
Man, time flies.
Fiction.
Bullshit. Of course there are certain cultural assumptions that are considered normative. For example, the two-parent nuclear family. Why not polygamy? Why not large communal family arrangements, meaning, many unrelated people living together as if they were a family unit? Those exist but are generally considered 'weird' or 'abnormal'. There was even a whole TV show putting polygamists on display for how weird they are.
a group coalescing around a norm doesn’t causally prescribe or enforce the norm to the group
Oh, so you DO acknowledge the reality of certain cultural assumptions considered normative. I said nothing about how those norms are 'enforced'. Sometimes the only enforcement is social pressure, but in the case of polygamy, enforcement is with the use of state violence. I fully support the liberty of individuals to 'do their own thing' (without violating the NAP of course), but that doesn't mean that there isn't a set of normative standards.
You are the one playing stupid here.
Jeff ain't playing.
>>Democrats' long goodbye to the working class.
but ... union pride?
These days, Pride means something completely different.
So does union..
Well, they still have the Union bo$$e$.
https://twitter.com/monacharen/status/1589013687918276608
Other than murder, violent crime is not up. Did you know that? Violent crime is a key midterm voting issue, but what does the data say?
Sure, maybe because criminals used to just beat people up, now they kill them?
Or crime just isn't being reported because why bother? A dead body in the street will still generate a police report.
We know that the crime data for several large, Democrat cities is far from complete. Thus, who knows how high the violent crime rate actually is (including murder).
Move the reply button
Interesting comment. I'm curious as to the backstory of why "Move the reply button"?
If you're scrolling on mobile, phone or tablet, the reply button gets in the way when trying to advance the screen, and often causes you to start a reply when that wasn't your intention.
I imagine he posts that comment whenever that happens as a way of dealing with the frustrating ergonomic design of the mobile site.
Oh, yeah, I've run into that. It's pretty fuckin' obnoxious.
Other than the several major metro areas that didn't report their crime data, crime data reporting is up.
The data says you can fudge the numbers, shift categories, of all sorts of violent crimes - except murder.
You can't hide it when the bodies are stacking up.
Hence why the murder rate is the proxy for total violent crimes.
Making money online more than $15k just by doing simple work from home. I have received $18376 last month. Its an easy and simple job to do and its earnings are much better than regular office job and even a little child can do this and earns money. Everybody must try this job by just use the info on this page…
AND GOOD LUCK HERE.........>>> topcitypay
Huh. If only the administrators at the University of Chicago were more like these guys...
https://provost.uchicago.edu/sites/default/files/documents/reports/FOECommitteeReport.pdf
They were. The discussion took place and you don’t like the outcome. It’s a funny twist on “The Emperor’s New Clothes” where, at the end, rather than the Emperor insisting the procession march on, you suddenly start scrambling to cover your own nakedness and point fingers shrieking, “You told me I looked gorgeous!”
Nobody, but nobody, is unclear on exactly what the issue with the class and/or title is and its potential for abuse. But you won’t let that stop you from showing up to play retarded.
No no, I get it. What they really meant was
" Universities
should be expected to provide the conditions within which hard thought, and therefore
strong disagreement, independent judgment, and the questioning of stubborn
assumptions, can flourish in an environment of the greatest freedom.” * except if right-wing snowflakes are triggered
So, are you going to commit right here and now to your support for a class on "The Problem with Trannies"?
that would require intellectual honesty.
Somehow this 'individualist' interested in equality has come down on the side of "its ok to group THESE certain people into negative stereotypes, but not these other groups favored by the elites in power" because we apparently have never had that go wrong in human history
I am not going to object to any institution of education offering any class on any relevant topic of intellectual pursuit in a professional and age-appropriate manner.
So no of course I object to a class called "The Problem With Trannies" because the name itself gives away the lie that the class is unprofessional and insulting.
But if the University of Chicago wanted to offer a class about transgenderism which included as a part of its content a critique or criticism of transitioning between genders then go right ahead. I won't stop you. Why would I?
"professional and age-appropriate manner."
Is that why you were against Desantis' Florida bill, because you agreed that topics including sexual orientation and different types of sex acts were age appropriate for K-3rd grade?
No no, I get it. What they really meant was
I didn't say you didn't get it. Or that you didn't understand what it meant. "Play retarded" means you actually aren't retarded and fully understand what's going on, you just want to pretend that you don't.
You can play your "Universties should be free to torture people and call it an education." retarded game all you like. That doesn't mean everybody else has to be discomforted to whatever degree you or the University pleases.
Again, for an individualist, this isn't that hard... unless you're playing retarded.
"What they really meant was..."
"d0gWHisTLeS"
You know who actually hears all those dogwhistles? The dogs in question.
Dissemble,
If only the administrators at the University of Chicago were more like these guys…
deflect,
No no, I get it. What they really meant was
distract.
* except if right-wing snowflakes are triggered
Imitating his Marxist trainers is all Jeffy knows how to do.
the problem presenting itself is telling the professor he's a racist fuck results in a lower grade.
I find it hard to believe the University Of Chicago has a computer with a glitchy space bar
>>Conservatives of late have imagined themselves the defenders of academic freedom.
1619 is true and adult men barely dressed as women is appropriate for 1st grade class.
Polls of the overall preferences of the entire electorate just before an election are worse than useless. Even the polls of likely close Senate and House races are misleading. Having said that, control of the Congress is highly over-rated. With a Democrat in the White House the only role for a GOP Congress would be to stop the Democrats for the next two years, and the GOP has a very sorry track record even for that limited goal. Also, when the Congress and the White House are firmly in GOP hands, they never ever repeal any of the Democrat agenda, preferring to focus on implementing their own worthless platform.
With a sufficient lead the GOP can override those presidential vetos.
That scares the fuck out of the GOP - maybe having to deliver - so they'll fuck it up. They always do.
I'm not sure the polls are predicting veto-proof majorities in the House and Senate...
So, this probably is pollyannish (Pollyannaish?) but I request everyone here who is voting tomorrow to please pay extra attention to your local and state races.
I've seen over the last decade a split in American politics. We have a completely disfunctional national political culture that is buttressed by a large amount of relatively reasonable local and state politics (I know California and Illinois are a shit-show, but I still think there are more reasonably run states than not).
One of the worst things we've seen in recent years is a move towards everything being brought up to the national level. Push back against that. Take your local elections seriously and engage with the laws being passed and the officials being elected.
Although true, the main reason everything has been nationalized (even further) is that the two-party system eliminates any possibility of depolarizing the hot-button issues. The two-party system guarantees that either a Progressive Socialist or a Fascist Nationalist will win almost every election at almost every level of government - except, of course, for the corrupt big city elections where party doesn't matter. The only practical way I can see to defuse the situation at this point is to put all of our resources into establishing the ranked-choice, at-large election system to achieve proportional representation at every possible level of government in every state legislature and the Congress.
I've been wondering something lately. So, I do think we have a variety of pretty well run states, that mostly fit the needs of people who live there. I'm starting to wonder if putting all of our anxieties into the federal government is what takes the energy from local politics and allows it to function a bit better.
I have no idea though. This is more my concern that systems are a pretty delicate balance, and that it's difficult to predict the consequences of changes. This isn't really pressing for anything though, this is just a thought.
Probably the best result though is that something non-political becomes the major siphon of focus for people. National politics are something akin to entertainment these days (and I'm clearly not free of that sin) and I think that's also not helpful.
So, this probably is pollyannish (Pollyannaish?) but I request everyone here who is voting tomorrow to please pay extra attention to your local and state races.
We're getting to vote on ranked choice.
I'm voting against it as my first choice, and for it as my second.
Do you know if anyone has suggested a way to back test whether the change in voting actually helped or not?
I hope we vote ourselves in charge of the lower 49 and we send every proggie from north and east of our state border home to their native state.
I can't tell if you're trying to make a joke about AK or HI.
"Because of the help I had from the senators in the Democratic Congress, we literally cut the federal debt in half by $1.4 trillion — $1.4 trillion! JOE BIDEN THE lazy and stupid
Actually, no. The debt has not been cut in half; it remains at over $31 trillion.
Heh! The way to cut deficit spending in half is to cut spending in half. Like the retailers who pretend to hold a "half-off sale," government can pretend to cut deficit spending in half by tripling government spending for a while and then cutting it by one-third. It's magic!
Maybe that's why he actually used the word, "deficit", not "debt"?
So maybe stop bragging about only yacking up the credit card not quite as much as last year?
When ENB's head explodes, who will do the morning links?
https://notthebee.com/article/elon-musk-tells-independent-voters-to-vote-republican
Robby? Lancaster? At least till their heads explode too.
Robby's hair will keep his head together. Perhaps in his case a hair implosion is more likely.
This WEF “let’s add socialism to capitalism” thing is not working. There’s nothing Republicans can do about it. So today, in global capitalism news:
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/billions-capital-calls-threaten-wreak-010512447.html
The democrats wanted FDR and the Great Depression and it looks like it might happen. Emergency powers.
The economy is FUBAR
For lonley guys to find casual chat contacts Transexuel sex in Marseille
> The University of Chicago canceled a class called "The Problem of Whiteness" after conservative students and activists complained. Conservatives of late have imagined themselves the defenders of academic freedom. But as recent right-wing enthusiasm for book bans, laws limiting how teachers talk about subjects like race and gender, and campaigns like this show, much of the right is still plenty happy to limit academic freedom when it challenges their worldview.<
Is there no level of viciousness and irrationality on campus that should ever be objected to? Isn't the objection itself a form of speech? There’s no context in a declaration of equivalence like this. Would Reason magazine say that it would be wrong to protest the instituting of a course advocating mass murder of members of a particular group because doing so would impair “academic freedom”? It matters what exactly is being protested and whether the protest itself is just or unjust. How can these aspects be simply irrelevant? "Academic freedom" is not an ultimate end in itself that must be upheld regardless of any other consideration and even at the expense of one's own destruction.
It was ENB who said it, not "Reason magazine" saying it. Reason allows their writing staff to have personal opinions, even kinda dumb ones every once in a while.
Oh, and I almost forgot, Reason: Build your own twitter.
Now quit focusing on kultur war bullshit.
"Build your own twitter."
Not that hard. They did it with TRUTH Social.
I guess this is the new article we get to reference for the next two years when we point out what a fucking shithole this place is.
As I said above, Wednesday morning is going to be fun.
Wow, this chat room is rocking today, Peanuts.
I am assured of victory tomorrow.
Why, because the GOP will take the House and SWEET GRIDLOCK will be a certainty.
Remember my strategy. Since there is no libertarian win in the cards gridlock is what I vote for.
At least until 2024.
Edit to add - I would never vote for a GOP House with a GOP POTUS. History shows us that is when government grows fastest.
Wow, this chat room is rocking today, Peanuts.
Chat room????
Old groomer habits die hard.
What the hell does Shrike think we are, 8 year olds?
Isn't that too old for him?
turd lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a TDS-addled shit-pile, a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit.
Newsom power will soon go 'way
Gerry Brown will be fuhrer (again) one day
What the polling tell us?
Democrats know their Gov-GUN Nazi-Empire Theft tactics have destroyed the USA; but they just don't care cause they have MORE 'needs' for legal GUN theft.
Just like how criminals know they are ripping someone off but they just don't care because they WIN! [WE] mobsters RULE is Democrats definition of this nation just as it was with Nazi-Germany. Gov-GUNS everywhere so long as our mobsters win.
If anyone here is on the Financial Times, I’d like an explanation on this. How does the U.S. plan to force investors/corporations pay for emerging markets fossil fuel transitions?
Climate Jihad fascism today, per Financial Times
https://www.ft.com/content/cf064250-e4ce-48c2-a4dd-dc96bc7660e2
White House climate envoy John Kerry is planning to develop a system where developing nations can earn “carbon credits” by cutting fossil fuel emissions, according to The Financial Times.
The plan would reward countries with carbon credits if they reduce CO2 emissions from their power sector and in turn, large corporations would be able to buy the credits to offset their own carbon emissions, the FT reported, citing sources familiar with the plan.
https://www.tampafp.com/report-john-kerry-wants-to-pay-poor-countries-to-stop-using-fossil-fuels/
So it seems like the "rich countries" will create carbon credits out of thin air, give them to "poor countries" to not use fossil fuels (like that will work) then demand that corporations buy these credits.
It’s sad a supposedly libertarian magazine is crying because people criticized the lefts open racism. But it’s bizarre they do so in the same roundup they call other people snowflakes - a term they would never apply to the left.
Be honest, Ms. Brown. Had Musk not banned the imposters, you'd have written how ominous a sign it was that he couldn't even prevent users from impersonating himself. And please don't tell me you consider a college class titled "The Problem of Whiteness" to be a good thing. Would you feel the same about a "The Problem of Blackness" class? Why don't we settle on good old "Anthropology."
"Had Musk not banned the imposters, you’d have written how ominous a sign it was that he couldn’t even prevent users from impersonating himself."
You just know that, eh.
“Neither Republicans nor Democrats have a clear advantage as we head into Election Day tomorrow.”
Talk about whistling past the graveyard. Here we have it-a quailing political moment in clumsy disguise. The duplicitous E.Brown serves up more fake news, this time that the midterms hang in the balance.
Her proposition is sustainable only by cherry picking from some poisoned poll that grants her a spectre of hope, despite the presence of a hundred times the counter-factuals. We can only conclude she must also be the type who sees chemtrails as proof of Bigfoot.
The poor woman will soon need, and already should have, a straight jacket. Somebody get her some help. She’s about to suffer either a rude awakening or an ideological breakdown. We can only hope that she’s at least had the foresight to feed her cats and to put out the trash.
???
All she did was repeat what some poll said.
Derp derp derp here comes Mike
What are you, two years old?
Mike, stop playing stupid. We all know why she repeated that particular poll.
Because her job is to put up some links every morning? And there’s an election today?
Oh, right. If I don’t buy the narrative that she’s some kind of agent of the left I am being a derp derp derper. Have to remember to read sinister motives into everything ENB does.
I do not know what to say really what you share very well and useful to the community, I feel that it makes our community much more developed, thanks quordle
I'd like to make a me sandwich with you and that other horny slut, Laura Zimmerman
What makes you think they can be bot?
Very clever. +2
Great article, Mike. I appreciate your work, I'm now creating over $35000 dollars each month simply by doing a simple job online! I do know You currently making a lot of greenbacks (ugv-11) online from $28000 dollars, its simple online operating jobs
…
Just open the link——————————>>> http://Www.RichApp1.Com
The Zodiac’s name is Mike? Has the SFPD been informed??