Photos Show the Transformation of Great Britain
A new exhibit at the National Gallery of Art displays how the U.K. changed in the 1970s and '80s.

Not so long ago, Great Britain was deemed "the sick man of Europe." The 1970s were plagued by inflation, labor union strikes, and a rise in government spending as a percent of GDP. Now, a new photography exhibition at the National Gallery of Art (NGA) invites an American audience to consider snapshots of life as it was for everyday Britons from the 1970s to the 1980s and how the nation transformed from an ailing, deindustrializing country to greater economic prosperity starting in the 1980s. It's a hard story to tell, because to this day people have feelings about the upheaval that came with that change.
The exhibition, "This Is Britain: Photographs from the 1970s and 1980s," features 45 images taken by a diverse set of around 19 documentary photographers who wanted to convey the circumstances and/or hardships of a particular community. The late photographer Chris Killip (1946–2020), for example, lived in a caravan (trailer park) in northeast England for more than a year, photographing a community of people who subsisted off unemployment benefits and selling waste coal that washed up on the beach (see: Margaret, Rosie, and Val, Seacoal Camp, Lynemouth, Northumberland).
Photographer Vanley Burke, raised in Jamaica until he moved to Birmingham as a teenager in 1965, chronicled black British life, such as a smiling boy posing in 1970 with his bicycle, flying the British flag in a way that conveys the significance of immigrants' self-identification as British (see: Boy with Flag). Graham Smith photographed his economically depressed community in northeast England. His 1981 poignant image Clay Lane Furnaces, South Bank, Middlesbrough seems to tell a story of a receding industry.

An American curator, Kara Felt, spurred this NGA exhibition. Her photo selections and accompanying text make this, in a real sense, a British story told by an American to an American audience. Felt was initially inspired by a similar 2015 exhibition at the Walker Art Gallery in Liverpool. The 1970s and '80s represented a "real renaissance in British photography," Felt said in an interview. It was an era in which museums began supporting photography, and schools for the profession grew less vocational and more focused on the medium's artistic aspects, she explained. She also discovered it had been 30-some years since the last major presentation of such photographs to an American audience, a 1991 exhibition at the Museum of Modern Art in New York called "British Photography from the Thatcher Years."
The first thing to know about 1970s Britain when viewing the photographs is that things got really bad. Inflation teetered over 24 percent in 1975. The same pound bought far less than before. That is stressful to contemplate, given the U.S. experience in the 1970s era—and again recently—struggling with too-high inflation that peaked at nearly 15 percent by April 1980. Meanwhile, the British government actually owned and operated whole industries (steel, railways, airways, airports, and aerospace) along with utilities (gas, electricity, telecoms, and water). That wasn't going well. Too many industries were propped up by taxpayers rather than striving to win consumers and compete globally.
To make matters worse, labor unions staged relentless strikes throughout the 1970s to pressure lawmakers into raising their wages. "Because so many industries were nationalized, wage rises were agreed over 'beer and sandwiches' in 10 Downing Street, not in corporate offices; and if the politicians claimed to be out of money, the unions could hold the public to ransom through strike action," explains my colleague, Iain Murray, who hails from South Shields, the "industrial heart of the northeast of England," where most of the menfolk were employed in shipbuilding and coal mining.
In fact, the list of striking industries is somewhat horrific—crucial sectors of the economy like gravediggers, car makers, coal miners, train drivers, garbage collectors, nurses, sewage treatment workers. The strikes disrupted everyday life, especially during the "Winter of Discontent" between November 1978 and February 1979. This meant problems like hours or days with no electricity, the dead going unburied, piles of uncollected refuse, and even raw sewage poured into the rivers Thames and Avon.
These dire circumstances led to voters ending Labour Party rule and instead, in May 1979, giving the Conservative Party a chance to run the country. And this brings us to the political figure inexorably associated with the decade to follow: Margaret Thatcher, the "Iron Lady" elected Conservative Party leader in 1975 and then Prime Minister from 1979 to 1990. She was and is alternately despised and revered, depending on who you ask.
"Margaret Thatcher was not a conservative; she was a revolutionary," explains Marian Tupy, a scholar at the libertarian Cato Institute. "The structure of the British economy changed under Thatcher," further transitioning from heavy manufacturing to a service economy. In 1970, 30 percent of the U.K. economy was manufacturing and about 56 percent services, according to the U.K. Office for National Statistics. By 1989, it was 20 percent manufacturing and nearly 67 percent services. "Instead of being a sixth or 10th generation miner, people had to try something new," said Tupy.
In short, Thatcher was not trying to conserve a long-standing status quo. She espoused free market values, broke the power of the labor unions, junked price controls and other stifling economic regulations, and set about privatizing government-run industries. "We have stopped creating wealth," Thatcher told William F. Buckley in 1977. "To create more, you need a slightly freer society and you need an incentive society." That kind of change didn't sit well with everyone. It meant hard times.
"Looking back to the 60s and 70s, you were thinking you had a job for life, you know?" a former coal miner turned museum curator told a Welsh newspaper in 2020. "The collieries [coal mines] had always been there in one form or another. The education was quite good if you wanted it in the colliery, and the wages were reasonable. So, you thought, 'that's it.' And then all of a sudden, the place shut."
When Thatcher took office in 1979, 25 percent of unemployed people had been out of work for over a year. By 1984, it was 39.6 percent. At the end of 1973, the unemployment rate itself was a record low of 3.4 percent but had almost tripled to 11.9 percent by April of 1984. There was a real initial human cost to the Thatcher reforms. But by the mid to late 1980s, the country was enjoying an economic boom.
Over at the NGA exhibition, the 1980s room is introduced by the caption "Picturing Absurdity in the Thatcher Years" and explains that photographers "used the brash colors of advertising to poke fun at the rise of leisure activities, consumerism, and corporate greed" of that boom period and "openly satirize long-held traditions and question emerging values in British society." This includes, for example, an image from the 1989 Cambridge University Ball by Chris Steele-Perkins, in which party revelers are put under hypnosis, just for fun. The accompanying curator text explains this image "wryly comments on the excesses and zombie-like conformity of upper-class British youth." (Making fun of the "yuppies," as Tupy aptly put it.)
As a viewer, I could readily rewrite this as "capturing delight and relief that people now had more leisure time and activities, access to better and more affordable consumer goods, and all thanks to private sector companies generating real economic prosperity." That's not how the photographic journalists seem to see it. Behold, for example, photographer Paul Reas's 1987 garish image of a man shopping for pork while wearing a pig-motif jumper, Hand of Pork, Newport South Wales. Or the set of photos by Anna Fox "mock[ing] the escalating materialism associated with Margaret Thatcher" and "prob[ing] the competition, stress, and alienation of London office work."
Photojournalists may have been, on average, more cynical about consumerism than ordinary people. The trappings of industry and manufacturing can appear noble and beautiful, in a way (see: Agecroft Power Station, Salford by John Davies). But industrial-age manual labor was no joke.

In November 2021, I visited the remnants of a turn-of-the-century coffin-making factory in Birmingham, a leading city in the Industrial Revolution, the second largest city in Britain, and the hometown of Rock and Roll Hall of Fame band members of Duran Duran. The Newman Brothers factory is now the Coffin Works museum. But back in the day, workers manufactured coffins for the booming business of formal funerals. Sometimes, if they weren't careful or fast enough, they could lose a finger in the machinery, like the "drop stamp" used to press a shape into a piece of sheet metal. All day, a worker had to repeatedly drop a heavy weight or hammer onto the metal piece and then whisk it away, swiftly replacing it with a new metal piece. Windows, which many 21st-century workers in developed countries now take for granted, were needed for daylight to illuminate the factory but were made opaque to prevent workers from window gazing. There's a reason so many young people probably didn't want the jobs their parents and grandparents had.
The country's transformation to a post-industrial economy had tradeoffs, but they surely amounted to a net gain for Britons. Where photographers may seem alternately nostalgic and cynical, an American viewer of the National Gallery of Art exhibition could see a country's emergence from drudgery to opportunity, abundance, and prosperity.
It's worth mentioning that the exhibition also references violent political unrest of the era, in England and over Northern Ireland, along with two films dealing with race and sexuality, all fraught topics worthy of their own consideration and review.
"This Is Britain: Photographs from the 1970s and 1980s" is on view at the National Gallery of Art from January 29 through June 11, 2023, in the West Building.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
The sick trans of Europe.
I get paid over 190$ per hour working from home with 2 kids at home. I never thought I’d be able to do it but my best friend earns over 10k a month doing this and she convinced me to try. The potential with this is endless. Heres what I’ve been doing..
HERE====)> http://WWW.NETPAYFAST.COM
I am making a good salary from home $6580-$7065/week , which is amazing under a year ago I was jobless in a horrible economy. I thank God every day I was blessed with these instructions and now it’s my duty to pay it forward and share it with Everyone,
🙂 AND GOOD LUCK. 🙂
Here is I started.……......>> http://WWW.SALARYBEZ.COM
Judging by the photos, black people got Britain’s economy on the right track in the 80’s, not Margaret Thatcher.
That should be a morning Britblack
Great article, Mike. I appreciate your work, I’m now creating over $35,000 dollars each month simply by doing a simple job online! I do know You currently making a lot of greenbacks online from $28,000 dollars, its simple online operating jobs.
.
.
Just open the link———————————————>>> http://Www.JobsRevenue.Com
Black chives matter.
Isn't that the Royal Family?
My last month's online earning was $17930 just by doing an easy job obout 3 months ago and in my first month i have made $12k+ easily without any special online experience. Easiest home based online job to earn extra dollars every month just by doing work for maximum 2 to 3 hrs a day. I have joined this job aEverybody on this earth can get this job today and start making cash online by just follow details on this website........
See this article for more information————————>>>OPEN>> OPEN>> http://WWW.DAILYPRO7.COM
I thought it was a Canadian photo of Trudeau and his pals all dressed up, and in full makeup.
Of course, it hasn't occurred to you that "black people got Britain’s economy on the right track in the 80’s", not, "in spite of" Margaret Thatcher but because of.
You're right. I really enjoyed this article. Keep posting such valuable content. Also, you can explore the world through Whatsapp groups that you can join and be part of a large community.
Follow>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://WHATSGROUPSLINK.COM
"Meanwhile, the British government actually owned and operated whole industries—steel, railways, airways, airports, and aerospace—along with utilities—gas, electricity, telecoms, and water. That wasn't going well. Too many industries were propped up by taxpayers rather than striving to win consumers and compete globally."
Clearly, they did not do true socialism hard enough. Or too many kulaks resisted.
Also could be not enough DEI.
I had an Austin Mini and an MG 1100 back in the seventies. Drove a Jaguar in the nineties and I still have a 62 Austin Healey Sprite in the garage. The Brits built beautiful cars but you'd be lucky to get 10000 miles out of one before it got towed to the scrap yard. I always figured it was because of UK socialism and the fact that they had very little domestic competition. They didn't build reliable cars because they didn't have to. Not sure it was even on their radar screen.
I still remember a bumper sticker at a vintage car show: "all parts falling off of this vehicle are of the finest British manufacture".
Also something about British technology ending development sometime between steam and electricity.
An old joke about England;
Q: Why do the English like warm beer?
A; Because Lucas makes their refrigerators. 🙂
Lucas? The Prince of Darkness?
American cars went to shit around this time too.
I thought mass immigration displacing a indigenous native population was called "colonialism" and was a bad thing.
Here's a useful decoder: if white people do something, especially to POCs, it is a bad thing. If we reverse the skin colors, it is a good thing.
- from the Anti-racist Handbook
https://twitter.com/monitoringbias/status/1624213230267629569?t=jJh-iApJMLOGWgfDW-lQuQ&s=19
Eyeballing this graph: Black males from affluent families are anywhere from 5 to 10 times more likely to be incarcerated than white males from affluent families.
Also: Black males from higher-income families are incarcerated at about the same rate as working-class whites.
[Link]
https://twitter.com/Babygravy9/status/1624365070921699329?t=Shp413ot4OsFJZFOLCK9iw&s=19
In the Hour of Decision, Spengler noted that the "work shy" were far more important in the Bolshevik revolution than the proletariat. Leninism was built on mobilising every kind of resentment, including against workers. Leftists today are no different.
[Link]
https://twitter.com/AuronMacintyre/status/1624433253053607936?t=bSKE4eonxxC8Pni7gBcQAQ&s=19
If you keep calling people who want migrants to stop raping their children fat-right they might believe you
The left are so desperate to manufacture the enemies they desire that they’ll let the most horrific crimes go unpunished just to torture the population, hope the food will bite
[Link]
https://twitter.com/MrAndyNgo/status/1624429180489170944?t=7He09tq1aNlxU5rM_xSxMA&s=19
Tonight: A protest against male migrants being housed at a hotel in #Kirkby, England (near Liverpool) turned violent as a police vehicle was attacked. The locals are angry because a school girl says she was propositioned by a migrant from there.
#Antifa & communists also organized their own direct action to oppose the locals protesting against the migrant hotel in Kirkby, England. Local police are appealing for information about a male migrant who allegedly propositioned a schoolgirl.
The rioters in #Kirkby, England (near Liverpool) accuse the migrants housed at a local hotel of being nonces (British slang for pedophiles). They’re furious after a local schoolgirl recorded video of an adult male migrant allegedly propositioning her.
Girl: “I’m only 15”
Migrant: “Okay, good”
This is the video that was recorded in #Kirkby, UK by a schoolgirl approached by a migrant. The video sparked a violent protest outside the migrant hotel last night. Open border activists, media & #Antifa say the protesters are far-right
[Videos]
I quit working at shoprite and now I make $65-85 per/h. How? I'm working online! My work didn't exactly make me happy so I decided to take a chance on something new… after 4 years it was so hard to quit my day job but now I couldn't be happier.
Here’s what I do....................>>> http://www.jobsrevenue.com
https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/where-is-the-moral-outrage-about-britains-grooming-gang-scandal/
https://twitter.com/ripx4nutmeg/status/1624387919153709057?t=dPASpnz3xR8nvcUSt7jiCA&s=19
Italian politician Alessandra Mussolini, someone who has described herself as a 'proud fascist' and repeatedly made slurs against homosexuals, is now a campaigner for more gender fluidity in the European Union
[Link]
Cannot imagine why a fascist would love gay and trans activism. Baffling.
Oh...
Real head scratcher...
Gender bendito
https://twitter.com/TheRabbitHole84/status/1624280312598638594?t=KzyXZdZYLwEraCFzlfXveg&s=19
New York Times props up pseudo historian who disrespects the legitimate genius of Thomas Sowell in stunning low IQ display of black on black violence.
[Link]
Quite amusing coming from someone whose credentials are an MA in journalism and has no academic output at all.
I think we have a stellar example of Dunning-Kruger here: someone with so little expertise that she doesn't even recognize how one of the top economists in the country might have something to say about slavery and economic history.
Well, that is some projection.
doesn’t even recognize how one of the top economists
He grew up in the South in the 30s. That alone makes him more familiar with pre-Civil Rights Era culture (agrarian lifestyle, segregation/Jim Crow, etc.) than (e.g.) Al Sharpton. Hell, Sowell was 25 when Emmett Till was killed. Sharpton was 4. NHJ wouldn't have been born for more than another 20 yrs.
Imagine being such a terrible historian that you're actually anti-history.
Don't judge people by the color of their skin, but by the color of their dyed hair, not to mention the content of what's under the hair (very little).
Imagine being such a stupid, insular, historically oblivious, post-Civil Rights pseudo-historian that you question the blackness of someone who grew up in the Pre-Civil Rights Era South.
The degree of stupidity really is mind boggling. I'm like 95+% *I've* spent more time in the fields, picked more cotton, and got paid less to do it than NHJ or KBJ.
Just had a sodden thought ... Margaret Thatcher broke the unions' stranglehold party by selling off all the nationalized unionized industries.
We should followup: make it a rule that all unionized industries must be privatized, sold off as competing businesses. And we can start with the SEIU by splitting up and selling off all unionized government agencies.
Start with the schools.
You know, the North hated Thatcher for generations because she shut down the coal mines, which were the generous (tax funded) teat their economies suckled all the way back to the wars. They still do, even the kids who weren't born 40 years ago.
Thing is, now coal is evil. Like public enemy #1 in the "climate crisis". But the left still revile Thatcher. She's the devil.
Shouldn't she be an angel of the environmental movement? A paragon of forward thinking virtue, who lifted the benighted climate destroyers out of their antiquated thinking, who dragged them kicking and screaming into a better world? If you hate someone who moved the economy away from inefficient and carbon intensive coal, you want grandma to die... or something. I get my crises mixed up sometimes.
It's all about intentions, not results, with progressives.
For example, the ideal tax policy for progressives is one that intends to stick it to "the 1%", but that actually causes the net worth of billionaire donors to progressive parties to triple: good intentions combined with practical benefits to progressives!
Thatcher intended to promote free markets and accidentally reduced carbon emissions = bad. Biden intended to reduce carbon emissions and accidentally increased them and caused massive inflation = good.
I think we can break the Democrat’s stranglehold by selling of the internal organs of democrats.
Holy Shit! Reason made the disinformation list!
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/restoring-america/equality-not-elitism/disinformation-group-secretly-blacklisting-right-wing-outlets-bankrolled-state-department
"GDI has identified that the 10 "riskiest" news outlets for disinformation are the American Spectator, Newsmax, the Federalist, the American Conservative, One America News, the Blaze, the Daily Wire, RealClearPolitics, Reason, and the New York Post."
LOL
That'll be news to the ones here who suck up to the Democrats.
A cynic might speculate that daddy Koch Bucks paid this outfit for the ninth place ranking to redeem some cred for his pathetic propaganda mouthpiece. After all Reason mostly just regurgitates whatever shows up on state organs like Wapo and NYT. Not what anyone would describe as libertarian. I prefer to think that the misinformation identified is found exclusively in the comment section. And for that we can all be proud.
They won’t learn a thing, even when they’re lined against the wall with us lowlife commenters. Not a goddamn thing.
To be fair, Reason really is one of the least reliable sources of news I know; almost every article either distorts facts, omits facts, or simply misreports facts in order to fit a political agenda.
Especially in light of what Gaear indicates above. A good percentage of the time they're just taking the NYT's or the WaPo's story and rehashing the facts... only to keep the slant but make things that are clear in the NYT and WaPo more vague, if not outright incorrect.
Normally, subsequent authors, even if they got scooped, would expand the understanding or assemblage of facts. Not Reason, they seem to exist only to be a shitty journalism version of The Telephone Game.
ENB and Scott are gonna need a safe place to recover.
South Dakota Senate Passes Ban On Puberty Blockers, Trans Surgery
https://www.zerohedge.com/political/south-dakota-senate-passes-ban-puberty-blockers-trans-surgery
No lucky Pierre for the groomers.
Are they going to Sioux?
Groomer Jeffy hardest hit.
Whoa. Insurrection at the OK statehouse.
https://twitter.com/nickcamper/status/1622654812511772679
You know Tony was somewhere in that crowd of angry cunts (dicks? ladydicks?)
Trans lives don't matter. If they did, it would be 'past-naming' and not 'dead-naming'. If your past is dead, you killed it, and you want it to stay buried, then whatever brought you to wherever you are now in your life/transition didn't matter.
If Reason is still around in 30 years from now, they'll be writing paeans to the glorious time that Block Insane Yomomma was the great leader in world history.
Thank god he ushered in that post racial society. Oh wait...
US violates Canada's airspace to shoot down shiny abject.
https://www.zerohedge.com/political/third-high-altitude-airborne-object-shot-down-us-fighter-jet
Shiny object. Edit never works for me.
Kinda works both ways, actually.
Shoot first, explain it to the Galactic Federation after you put the pieces back together, hope they don't retaliate.
I lived in England during the mid/late 1970's. From the 4 day week during the winter of 73/74 - to the currency run - it was a place that was still obsessed with the pre-WW1 days of empire and didn't know how to move forward without empire. Thatcher was far more significant than Reagan in changing the culture of the place.
England then kind of reminds me of a less toxic version of Russia. Except that kleptocratic revanchism is not at all a solution for paralysis by nostalgia.
Yea, but you have like a 78 IQ
Wow, Tony beats him by 7 points! According to Tony anyway.
This is awesome
OT post:
https://news.yahoo.com/minnesota-woman-calls-police-black-174242928.html
We are all becoming Karens! We are now into a major episode of a "Karen Apocalypse"! What can I DO to prevent becoming an infected Karen in the "Karen Apocalypse"!?! ... Wait, I know! I will call the cops every time that I vaguely fear a suspected Karen! THAT will help stem the spread of Karenism!
Why is a service economy good? Why is the goal to be post industrial.
I mean, it's great she moved against nationalization, but it's not a good thing to stop producing stuff yourself. It makes you dependent on others.
Industry is a good thing. Factory jobs are good jobs. And it's better to have them in 1st world countries than in 3rd world, because 1st world countries care about pollution and safety
If you can arrange for other nations to send you stuff without returning anything of value to them, you're living the good life. Well, until those other nations wise up.
Division of labor, comparative advantage, everything costing less for everyone. There are a lot of costs you have to pay if you beg government to intervene in the free movement of labor and capital.
Agreed! And growing bananas, coffee, or sugar in Norway makes ZERO sense!
Christine Hall's resume -- Steve Forbes campaign, Christian News Service, Mark Sanford staff -- marks her as precisely the type of loser who should be spouting faux libertarian, right-wing bullshit for the culture war casualties awaiting replacement.
Carry on, clingers. So far as better Americans permit, and not a step beyond.
What, no shoving things down peoples throats when you’re being a misogynistic bigot? You’re slipping Artie.
Democrats aren’t Americans. They’re only territorial residents. Soon to be removed.
Fortunately, Brexit has saved Britain from the worst of the EU. But they seem pretty intent on ruining things themselves.
The Transformation of Great Britain generally refers to the period of significant economic and social change in Britain during the 18th and 19th centuries often referred to as the Industrial Revolution. During this time, there was a shift from traditional manufacturing methods to more mechanized and efficient production techniques. This led to the growth of industries such as textiles, coal mining, and iron production, and created new economic opportunities for many people. The changes also had profound social effects, including the growth of urbanization, the rise of the middle class, and changes in the way people lived and worked. The transformation of Great Britain had a significant impact on the world and set the stage for many of the economic and social changes that continue to shape our lives today.