Republicans and Democrats Face Impasse Over Cutting Spending Versus Raising Taxes
Plus: Court denies motion to suppress January 6 geofence warrant, Texas may ban some immigrants from buying property, and more...

A Monday speech by House Speaker Kevin McCarthy (R–Calif.) and proposals President Joe Biden is expected to float in tonight's State of the Union (SOTU) address highlight the impasse Republicans and Democrats find themselves in over spending and debt. They also highlight absurdities in both parties' negotiating positions.
Biden wants to increase the U.S. debt ceiling—that is, the amount of outstanding debt the U.S. government is allowed to have—which already stands at a whopping $31.4 trillion. McCarthy-led Republicans in the House of Representatives say that's not happening without other spending cuts.
If we don't raise the debt ceiling, the federal government will not have enough money to pay off its obligations starting around June. This could set off a cascade of negative economic effects.
"Raising the debt limit is not about new spending; it is about paying for previous choices policymakers legislated," note Leonard Burman and William G. Gale for the Brookings Institution. But raising the debt ceiling without either cutting spending or raising more revenue simply ensures that we kick this can down the road.
Republicans want to fix this issue through deep cuts to federal spending. McCarthy reiterated this in a Monday speech.
"A responsible debt limit increase that begins to eliminate wasteful Washington spending and puts us on a path to a balanced budget is not only the right place to start, it's the only place to start," he said. "Now we must return Washington to a basic truth: Debt matters. The debt limit is one of the most important opportunities Congress has to change course."
Republicans say they won't raise the debt ceiling without spending cuts—a move Biden and Democrats are trying to portray as reckless and cruel, indifferent to the havoc that defaulting on obligations could wreak.
The absurdity in Biden's framing is that Democrats aren't simply helpless bystanders here. They could choose to compromise and cut spending and McCarthy and co. would go along with the debt ceiling increase. But Democrats, too, refuse to budge here.
The absurdity in the Republican position is that they refuse to consider cuts that might be politically unpopular, including cuts to Medicare, Social Security, or military spending. They have remained relatively vague—including in McCarthy's Monday speech—about where these cuts will be made and just how we'll move toward a more balanced budget.
In any event, "the White House has said it won't negotiate on the debt ceiling but is open to separate talks about reducing the deficit," notes The Wall Street Journal. And, as per usual for Democrats, Biden's side wants to do this by raising taxes.
In his SOTU speech tonight, Biden is expected to call for more tax increases. But like Republicans who refuse to consider cuts to popular entitlement programs, the Democrats are cowards here. Rather than admitting that the only way to fund their ever-expanding spending ambitions is through broad tax increases and other measures that will resonate across the board, Biden likes to pretend that we can fuel endless spending by simply wringing more money from the very rich.
"Under [Biden's] plan, no one making under $400,000 per year will pay more in taxes," the White House insisted yesterday, reiterating promises Biden made on the campaign trail and over the past two years. But a lot of experts disagree with this claim; at best, the calculation is unclear.
In tonight's speech, Biden is expected to again call for a "billionaire tax." He also wants to quadruple the amount of taxes companies pay when they buy back shares. From the Financial Times:
The newest proposal that Biden will unveil on Tuesday is the quadrupling of the 1 per cent excise tax on share buybacks, which was passed as part of last year's Inflation Reduction Act (IRA), and staunchly opposed by business. Biden administration officials have frequently blasted companies, including oil groups, for returning money to shareholders through buybacks rather than investing them in their communities or rewarding workers.
Biden will also reprise his attempt to enact a tax on billionaires' unrealised investment gains, which he had championed throughout 2022 but failed to secure in the final round of negotiations over the IRA following a backlash from some Republicans and moderate Democrats.
But, as the Times notes, "Biden's call for higher taxes on high-income households and big business has had only limited success over the past two years, when Democrats controlled both chambers of Congress, and will face even more resistance with a Republican-controlled House of Representatives."
FREE MINDS
"Geofence warrants are just part of day-to-day cop business these days," laments Tim Cushing at Techdirt. "Rather than moving forward with a list of suspects, law enforcement agencies just ask for data on everyone in a certain area at a certain time and move backwards to probable cause to investigate and arrest."
The FBI utilized geofence warrants in its investigation into January 6 protesters—one of whom challenged the use of these warrants in court, filing a motion to suppress data obtained through the warrant.
A court has now denied the motion to suppress. "The ruling [PDF] from the DC District Court does have a few problems with geofence warrants generally, but not this particular one," notes Cushing. "The court also says there's no expectation of privacy in anonymized location data. Referencing the Supreme Court's Carpenter decision, it says hoovering up massive amounts of data related to hundreds of devices isn't the same thing as harvesting data targeting a particular device over the space of days or weeks."
Cushing has more on the decision and on what it means here.
FREE MARKETS
Texas lawmakers want to ban some immigrants from buying property. Reason's Fiona Harrigan has more details:
As it currently stands, Texas law guarantees that "an alien has the same real and personal property rights as a United States citizen." That might not sound controversial—but a new bill is seeking to add some major exceptions.
Senate Bill (S.B.) 147, introduced in November by state Sen. Lois Kolkhorst (R–Brenham), would bar any "individual who is a citizen of China, Iran, North Korea, or Russia" from buying property in Texas. S.B. 147 would also block government and corporate entities of those nations from purchasing or acquiring property in the state. Last month, Texas Gov. Greg Abbott announced that he would sign the bill if passed.
When she introduced S.B. 147, Kolkhorst cited "highly disturbing" instances of foreign entities buying property in Texas and elsewhere in the United States. But certain aspects of the legislation are themselves disturbing, and its vague wording leaves the door open for dubious state action—including against citizens who have nothing to do with the evils of their governments.
Texas Gov. Greg Abbott has said that he will sign the bill if it passes.
QUICK HITS
New: Columbus designed a Black History Month cop car and put an MLK quote on it, "Be the peace you wish to see in the world." No historian I talked to, including the founding director of the King Papers Project, has ever seen this quote. https://t.co/w9zjpVpVeq
— Paul Blest (@pblest) February 6, 2023
• New York City Mayor Eric Adams will end the city's COVID-19 vaccine mandate for public employees.
• Google has released its own artificial intelligence tool, Bard, to compete with ChatGPT.
• "Does Lina Khan ever win a case?" asks The Wall Street Journal.
• "Former President Donald Trump's legal offensive against media outlets had yet another loss in court Friday, when a federal judge dismissed a defamation suit that his 2020 reelection campaign filed against The Washington Post," notes Reason's C.J. Ciaramella.
• "The family of a 12-year-old girl in Kenosha, Wisconsin, filed a federal civil rights lawsuit against police and the city after accusing an off-duty police officer of kneeling on the girl's neck while trying to break up a fight she was allegedly involved in," reports ABC News.
• Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis' misguided war on woke. (See also: "Florida's War on Drag Targets Theater's Liquor License.")
• Indiana lawmakers move to legalize throwing stars.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Republicans and Democrats Face Impasse Over Cutting Spending Versus Raising Taxes
I wonder which of those two things we'll do.
I am making a good salary from home $6580-$7065/week , which is amazing under a year ago I was jobless in a horrible economy. I thank God every day I was blessed with these instructions and now it’s my duty to pay it forward and share it with Everyone,
🙂 AND GOOD LUCK. 🙂
Here is I started.……......>> http://WWW.SALARYBEZ.COM
The newest proposal that Biden will unveil on Tuesday is the quadrupling of the 1 per cent excise tax on share buybacks, which was passed as part of last year's Inflation Reduction Act (IRA), and staunchly opposed by business. Biden administration officials have frequently blasted companies, including oil groups, for returning money to shareholders through buybacks rather than investing them in their communities or rewarding workers.
Biden will also reprise his attempt to enact a tax on billionaires' unrealised investment gains, which he had championed throughout 2022 but failed to secure in the final round of negotiations over the IRA following a backlash from some Republicans and moderate Democrats.
I get paid over 190$ per hour working from home with 2 kids at home. I never thought I’d be able to do it but my best friend earns over 10k a month doing this and she convinced me to try. The potential with this is endless. Heres what I’ve been doing..
HERE====)> http://WWW.NETPAYFAST.COM
Washington will tax harder and print more money. Dog bites man story.
Google is by and by paying $27485 to $29658 consistently for taking a shot at the web from home. I have joined this action 2 months back and I have earned $31547 in my first month from this action. I can say my life is improved completely! Take a gander at it what I do…..
For more detail visit the given link……….>>> http://Www.jobsrevenue.com
No, no, no, no.
The predictable uni-party response will be raising spending and cutting taxes. That's how we "compromise".
In the end, they'll compromise on cutting taxes and increasing spending.
It's going to be fascinating to see how the Fed manages to actually unwind any of their balance sheet while Congress makes a $2Trillion annual deficit the new normal.
Must be nice to be a Dem in DC these days, they don't have to worry about any of their "core" voters remembering when the their party spent a decade with their undies in a twist over $2-3Trillion (or so) being added to the debt under 2 consecutive GOP presidents, and they get to sleep in the knowledge that the media isn't about to do anything but cast their opponents as insane for worrying about piling that amount on every 14-16 months.
Who voted for this?
Reason staff and a whole lot of dead or relocated people plus the marxist footsoldiers of the DNC.
I know that was rhetorical but it must be repeated that the Reason staff are more closely aligned with progressive orthodoxy than anything resembling libertarianism.
But Orange Man bad!
Don't forget not just bad but also lazy and incompetent.
TDS much, M4E?
No, just call as I see them.
True, in addition to this devastating retort, you determine what type of vehicles people can drive w/o knowing how they use those vehicles, or considering individual liberties. You call things as you see them, and you see them through a lens of ideological bigotry.
●US Dollar Rain Earns upto $550 to $750 per day by google fantastic job oppertunity provide for our community pepoles who,s already using facebook to earn money 85000$ every month and more through facebook and google new project to create money at home withen few hours.Everybody can get this job now and start earning online by just open this link and then go through instructions to get started..........
See this article for more information————————>>>http://WWW.DAILYPRO7.COM
A court has now denied the motion to suppress.
With domestic terrorism that stabs at the very heart of our democracy, there is not 4th Amendment right.
Boots on the desk overrides the constitution.
We need common sense cosplay regulation now!
All that time spent worrying over AR-15s, and the militia movement when the real threat to the republic was a dude in a fur vest taking selfies in the rotunda. Maybe he borrowed Elmer Fudd's "Magic Helmet" and was off to kill the wabbit (even though Jan 6th is clearly duck season...)
...would bar any "individual who is a citizen of China, Iran, North Korea, or Russia" from buying property in Texas.
Some of those people know the dangers of the socialism they escaped. Don't want that knowledge taking root in Texas?
Spreading the wealth of knowledge around?
Columbus designed a Black History Month cop car and put an MLK quote on it, "Be the peace you wish to see in the world." No historian I talked to, including the founding director of the King Papers Project, has ever seen this quote.
People have dragged out the reverend's metaphorical corpse for far worse than this.
Some cops around my locality have "In God We Trust" on their vehicles. Those are the ones to really give wide berth.
And lo the gang of centurions said unto Jesus, "Stop resisting."
-Matthew 10:13
Says something different and apparently unrelated in the verse:
And if the house be worthy, let your peace come upon it: but if it be not worthy, let your peace return to you.
And if the piece be worthy, bet your house upon it; but if it be not worthy you'd better have one hell of a lawyer.
Is that when Jesus said "Don't tase me, bro"?
Solid effort. A+
Mlk is a racist in blackface, with his disgusting colorblind philosophy
I've read this exact thing on social media.
MLK is rolling in his grave,
Uncle Toms deserve that.
"Holy shit, that shit be mad dope!" --- Abe Lincoln
I think the quote is something like "Be the change you wish to see in the world" and came from Gandhi. Close enough, I guess.
New York City Mayor Eric Adams will end the city's COVID-19 vaccine mandate for public employees.
WHAT HAS CHANGED???
Grandma is already dead.
Nothing changed. New York never had a COVID-19 vaccine mandate.
Didn't they end up having to pay $10Million and re-hire a bunch of nurses a while back? How'd that happen without any kind of mandate?
Google has released its own artificial intelligence tool, Bard, to compete with ChatGPT.
Skynet will not abide competition.
Skynet's looking downright benign and far-seeing these days.
I'll take Skynet over wokenet. Skynet at least was trying to kill everybody, the woke 'AI' would be trying to kill those the progressives view as enemies.
Equity in its highest form.
"hoovering up massive amounts of data related to hundreds of devices isn't the same thing as harvesting data targeting a particular device over the space of days or weeks."
Exactly. The latter is an easily-extractable subset of the former.
Former President Donald Trump's legal offensive against media outlets had yet another loss in court Friday...
Is he paying his lawyers?
https://twitter.com/CarpeDonktum/status/1622768861740146689?t=yJ5IY2_v6JCH4hoFRkcBmg&s=19
Tonights #SOTU may include, but is not limited to:
1. Nuking MAGA people
2. Compulsory unity
3. Everything is Trumps fault
4. The climate killing us
5. Trans people are better than you
6. Everyone is racist, sexist, and homophobic except dems(who are perfect)
7. Get the Vax
8. I stopped the virus!
9. I shot the sher,uh,spy balloon!
10. Am hoping for a Fetterman “toxic lead in the work…water” brain shutdown moment.
11. Under me, the economy is the best it's ever been!
He'll definitely get this, and blather about national unity, then attack conservatism, trump, etc.
11. Thanking Jackie for her support. Is she here?
Special Hunter Biden artwork during the raffle.
Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis' misguided war on woke.
It will probably guide him all the way to 1600 PA Ave.
"Probably" is overstating his chances at this point, I think.
Things have to line up in a certain way for a Republican to win the White House: weak (D) opponent, bad economy if (D) is incumbent, etc.
Republicans just have to wholeheartedly embrace ballot harvesting.
Things have to line up in a certain way for a Republican to win the White House: weak (D) opponent, bad economy
Check
Check
I've pushed back against Buttplug's relentless gaslighting where he insists nobody could be dissatisfied with year 2 of the Biden economy.
However by late 2024 things might be good enough that the incumbent Prez "should" win reelection.
The Dems seem committed to limiting their field to Biden, Kamala, and Mayor Pete. Gavin Newsom might try to shoot his shot, but he's got the same handicap as Kamala in that he's never had to campaign to a crowd that wasn't already sold on him; not to mention that there was a poll of CA voters a few months back in which he got beat by DeSantis in a hypotehtical match-up. Unless something changes drastically in the next 2 years, it can almost be guaranteed that 2024 will see one of the weakest Dem candidates since McGovern.
Maybe the "war on woke" will end up costing DeSantis a chance at carrying CA, assuming he doesn't pivot away in the General like he should but no prospective GOP candidate goes into the race thinking there's any possibility of taking a state that touches the Pacific other than Alaska.
If a GOP candidate could take CA, that would almost guarantee a win in the popular vote as well as the electoral college (more than 100% of the national popular vote margin for HRC and Biden could be accounted for just in Los Angeles County)
Indiana lawmakers move to legalize throwing stars.
Teenage boys' bedroom doors hardest hit.
It's all fun and games until Butters loses an eye.
double entendre! Very good
The US (official) debt is $31.54T.
UsDebtClock dot org.
the Count from Seseme Street: "The suspense is killing me!"
😉
Numbers are racist.
Indiana lawmakers move to legalize throwing stars.
And there is much rejoicing in the sewers from The Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles.
🙂
Only the foot used throwing stars. The old saying is true, when you outlaw throwing stars, only outlaws will have throwing stars
Yes, now the Turtles will have parity, along with a convenient tool for cutting their favorite pizza.
🙂
Not a TMNT reader, eh? Leonardo should ring a bell.
I made throwing stars in metal shop in Jr High.
*aging myself*
Many an old cultivator were disassembled for our Shaw Bros. reenactments in the garage.
I made a gun rack in woodshop in Jr High.
https://dailycaller.com/2023/02/05/un-call-inquiry-religious-communities-fully-comply-lgbtq-agenda/
The United Nations is set to release a report at its annual Human Rights Council meeting in June to discuss the “perceived contradictions” between religious freedom and sexual orientation and gender identity.
Respondents were asked whether or not any religious beliefs and LGBT+ rights were “mutually exclusive,” to point out policies that protect discriminatory religious practices and about the extent to which religious individuals have the right to a conscientious objection.
“My biggest concern is the premise of the report which seems to suggest that freedom of religion and rights based on sexual orientation are the same,” Grace Melton, senior associate in the Richard and Helen DeVos Center for Life, Religion, and Family at the Heritage Foundation, told the Daily Caller News Foundation.
Nothing says "human rights" like compulsion.
“My biggest concern is the premise of the report which seems to suggest that freedom of religion and rights based on sexual orientation are the same,”
"since 'freedom', 'religion', 'rights', 'sexual', and 'orientation' are all ill-defined terms."
And only some of them are endorsed by progressives.
they are looking for a way to outlaw religion or force it to accept things it does not allow such as homosexuality and transgenderism and once you force them to a certain ideal they are no longer their religion China is already doing this the UN just wants to make it world wide. one religion for all.
With the state as the deity
It's interesting how establishment liberals set aside their "the only possible reason you could criticize this woman of color is because you're a racist misogynist" defensiveness when the woman in question is Kamala Harris.
NYT: Kamala Harris has already made history as vice president. But in private conversations, dozens of Democrats in Washington and around the U.S. said she has not risen to the challenge of proving herself as a future leader of the party, much less the country.
Recall that Stacey Abrams attained rockstar status by losing and engaging in "election denial." Yet the same political forces so eager to hype women of color just can't convince themselves Harris is anything special.
(But I still want to see Harris vs. DeSantis in 2024.)
Abrams became President of Earth because she's the size of a small planet herself.
That's no moon,
Willie Brown felt she had certain, quite special skills.
Certainly prevented her from churning out word salads around him all of the time.
She was hired for her skin color and genitalia. I guess those are not enough any more for the DNC.
She was hired because she had actually been the Dem establishment's first choice before Tulsi nuked her campaign; Harris is one of Hillary's creatures and she had been tabbed a while ago as the heir apparent because she was essentially the "black Hillary." The Senate seat was always meant to be a temporary stop.
The problem is that it's now coming out that she's dumber than a box of rocks and only got the clout she did because coastal Californians are even more retarded than she is.
All true
it's always misogyny if you dont support a D-fem but if you support an R-fem it's internalized misogyny, doncha know?
“Nearly everyone that I spoke with said, ‘Hey, look, if we can throw axes, we can certainly throw throwing stars.'” Some say additional safety measures need to be considered since throwing a star is different from throwing an axe.
Cool! Now let's legalize throwing knitting needles and (open) safety pins!
Throwing stars are basically assault axes, with their multiple piercing edges. Nobody needs that many edges. Why are they throwing common sense blade control out the window?!
Bring back lawn darts!
Unironically
Given an impasse of more taxes vs cut spending the best progressive ENB can come up with is a "boaf sidez" equivalence where one side refuses to act in good faith and the other refuses to slit it's own throat.
Biden likes to pretend that we can fuel endless spending by simply wringing more money from the very rich
It's not just Biden, it's a whole lot of people who think if we can just wring an extra trillion or so out of the billionaires (who stole all their money from the poor to start with), that will give us an extra trillion to spend on schools, an extra trillion to spend on infrastructure, an extra trillion to spend on climate change, an extra trillion to spend on childhood obesity, an extra trillion to spend on housing for the poor, an extra trillion to spend on student loans, an extra trillion to spend on healthcare, an extra trillion to spend on illegal immigration,an extra trillion to spend on green energy, an extra trillion for dance therapy for indigenous lesbian midgets, an extra trillion for swimming pools for inner-city youth, an extra trillion for African famine relief, plus a few extra trillion for debt reduction.
Whatever the government spends, it's not nearly enough to solve all the problems in the world yet at least 51% of the voters refuse to believe it. They believe all problems can be solved just by throwing enough money at it and only the government has a big enough shovel.
You forgot a trillion for Ukraine, you monster.
"Mint that coin! Mint that coin! Mint that coin!"
Better mint two, in case Joe loses one.
When it later turns up in his garage, imagine the joy over the budget surplus.
To be fair, if Silicon Valley VC investors have enough money to blow on perpetually money-burning ventures like Theranos, Uber, and Twitter, sucking up more from their bank accounts probably wouldn't hurt them too much. Same with Hollywood movie studios.
I'm remain eternally surprised that Republicans haven't proposed a 90% surtax on all movie and streaming revenues for companies that rely on overseas spending to fluff up their bottom lines.
It's almost enough to make me wish for an Atlas Shrugged moment.
Let's be honest. These politicians dont think anything about it or have any opinion or understanding. They are simply pandering to the useful idiots who want to hear it.
Indiana lawmakers move to legalize throwing stars.
All right! Let's fighting love!
How much are they taxing these throwing stars?
How far you you throw a movie star?
That depends dwane Johnson probably not far, Peter dinklage I can probably toss a decent distance
Midget paintball hunts > Midget bowling.
Ask Heidi Fleiss
Huh?
South Park episode.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Good_Times_with_Weapons
With Bard, individuals can “simplify complex topics” by using the AI tool to get highly detailed responses to queries. For example, a user can ask Bard to explain discoveries from a NASA telescope to a 9-year-old
For example, a user can ask Bard to explain the economic implications of Federal Reserve policies to a 79-year-old administration weenie.
But then you have to consider the censorship filter they'll put on that particular answer.
Just ask Bard who to vote for.
I have no idea if this is true.
The results of the Turkey/ mossad report shows that Russia is crushing Ukraine. 157,000 Ukrainians killed versus 28,000 Russians. 234,000 Ukrainians wounded versus 44,500 Russians.
Basically half the Ukrainian army removed from action. It really appears that we are willing to fight to the last Ukrainian.
Surprising number of NATO -5000 casualties… U.S. at 200.
30 of the best tanks is not gonna fix this. NATO is losing. Has any MSM reported this? Will they?
They won’t stop the killing until all the evidence of Biden’s corruption in Ukraine is destroyed.
The west must neocon harder!
I saw some of those numbers as well. Other questionable sources are putting Ukrainian KIA in the 200s. Germany commented on it where they are training another 30,000 Ukrainian troops wanting to complete this soon due to the high daily losses just around Bakhmut.
Telegram has a lot for in the field news. There is at least one channel that is about 50:50 Russian and Ukrainian members. That was a rough place to be and I left.
The numbers I've seen were basically the opposite. We likely won't know the truth for at least ten years.
Yet we should blindly support it as you have recently said.
sarc is a libertarian (tm) and Robby <3 him. We just need to tax harder and print more money for Ukraine.
Who cares, as soon as ukaine is gone the progs will move on to the next corrupt country to launder money
Battlefield maps say otherwise and those are harder to fake than body counts. And if this were true Kiev would be over run.
LOL
The story I saw had no corroborating links, so I wouldn't believe it.
The Turkish edition, citing Mossad, published estimates of the losses of the parties to the conflict in Ukraine
https://en.topwar.ru/210375-tureckoe-izdanie-so-ssylkoj-na-mossad-opublikovalo-ocenochnye-dannye-o-poterjah-storon-v-konflikte-na-ukraine.html
In any event, it ain't over until the Babushka Doll sings and Putin has done a Lead sinus clearing in his bunker.
The Russians have been historically good at mass murder.
Ask the Ukrainians and Volgadeutsche about it.
Armies with a 6:1 kill ratio don't retreat.
If the EU/US establishment press has been reporting the opposite, and cheering each influx of cash & shipment of arms, then it's a safe bet that they have been lying. Is the Mossad/Turkey report 100% accurate? Hard saying, but they're a lot closer, and not vested in the same way.
Erdogan and Putin are best buds. I would be just as skeptical of anything coming from Turkey as I am from the MSM
Green elites really just want to make you poorer, and them richer.
https://www.spiked-online.com/2023/02/07/how-the-green-elites-are-impoverishing-the-world/
The global super-rich love to warn us about climate change. They love to preach about all the things we’ll need to give up and all the sacrifices we should make. But they also love to travel in private jets and live in lavish mansions by the sea. They emit orders of magnitude more CO2 than the average person. So what explains this mismatch? Is there more to it than just hypocrisy?
But don't forget the anguish they went through trying to find enough pilots who had not been vaxxed.
Diversity training isn't there to help you, it's there to divide you.
https://www.spiked-online.com/2023/02/07/diversity-training-does-more-harm-than-good/
Meanwhile, teaching fashionable theories about ‘white privilege’ can encourage people to look down on low-income white people. Indeed, as Jesse Singal noted in the New York Times last month, DEI training often seems ‘geared more toward sparking a revolutionary reunderstanding of race relations than solving organisations’ specific problems. And they often blame white people – or their culture – for harming people of colour.’
Skin color is the most important thing
Marxism is the most important thing. Skin color is just a tactic.
Apparently the Columbus cops confused Mahatma “Be the change that you wish to see in the world” Gandhi with MLK, both dead dark-skinned famous people.
From what I've read of Ghandi's history, if he "be the change," then I don't want to be it.
Poverty is equity.
Agreed, unpleasant, often bordering on hypocritical.
The absurdity in the Republican position is that they refuse to consider cuts that might be politically unpopular, including cuts to Medicare, Social Security, or military spending.
They're willing to cut spending as long as it doesn't effect the budget deficit.
Not a lefty.
They are, literally, the only ones even humoring the idea of cutting spending.
Because they can't.
The Democrats have never even humored the concept.
Neither have Republicans. They only talk about it when they lack the power.
But they are talking about it now.
"One party is discussing cutting spending. The other is not. BOAF SIDEZ!!!!"
Because it requires all levers of government to act alone. See the multiple debt limit fights they have committed to in order to reduce spending.
I get you live in a fact free, narrative filled world. But you have issues.
And we shouldn't note that Obama and Biden BOTH voted against debt ceiling increases in the Senate and, when in the WH, whined about people voting as they did.
The republicans are definitely posturing and would not even consider spending cuts if they controlled all the branches. We all know it.
They should get credit for doing so.
However, are you implying their humoring of the idea gives scores them so many points that they are worth of a libertarian's support and votes?
That is not an absurd position politically. It is the inherent danger of a welfare state, especially in a democracy. Benefit entitlements are popular, general taxes are unpopular, and the public generally does not have to the acknowledge the realities of balancing the books. Like it or not, Medicare and Social Security cuts are not going to happen this Congress even if the GOP leadership were pushing them. The GOP majority is too thin. They are a political nonstarter.
To give progressives and other leftists credit, they sometimes approach thinking about welfare state solvency. Thus the cry "Tax (eat) the rich!"
My point is that once the GOP has the power to actually cut spending, they increase it. Their calls for reduced spending are just political theater. The only reason they're talking about budget cuts is because they have no chance of getting any through.
They are the only ones even willing to do it as political theater.
So where does that get us?
Not far, but at least it is being discussed.
When have they had the power to do it unilaterally? They have never had 60 in the Senate.
Columbus designed a Black History Month cop car and put an MLK quote on it
Need to add some big-ass blades that spin backward.
I hope it was a Cadillac.
Senate Bill (S.B.) 147, introduced in November by state Sen. Lois Kolkhorst (R–Brenham), would bar any "individual who is a citizen of China, Iran, North Korea, or Russia" from buying property in Texas. S.B. 147 would also block government and corporate entities of those nations from purchasing or acquiring property in the state. Last month, Texas Gov. Greg Abbott announced that he would sign the bill if passed.
The next logical step is to confiscate property currently owned by such prohibited persons.
didn't we do that once oh back in old WWII days and didn't we also do that to the Mexicans who got left on this side of the border. We will never learn that said Chinese corporations are buying up farm land and depleting water tables but they never have understood conservation and thats why they are here.
We should throw in Japanese people!
China seems to have 99 of the luftballoons.
https://nypost.com/2023/02/07/china-confirms-second-spy-balloon-over-latin-america/
Chinese officials have admitted to owning the second spy balloon spotted over Latin America last week, which they claimed was also blown off-course like the device shot down over US waters.
1619, Disney, and Woke Stupidity.
https://nypost.com/2023/02/06/1619-project-couldnt-get-more-cartoonish-even-as-a-disney-project/
The installment of the “Proud Family” series — in which the kids find out the founder of their town was a slave owner — is a cartoon version of the 1619 Project, although the 1619 Project is cartoonish in its own right.
Biden Balloon Bullshit.
https://nypost.com/2023/02/06/bidens-balloon-bs-insults-americans-intelligence-and-endangers-us/
Is there anything Team Biden won’t drag ex-prez Donald Trump into as a butt-covering maneuver?
"Don't say drag!"
Deflating like a Patriots football.
https://nypost.com/2023/02/06/bidens-but-trump-deceptive-balloon-defense-deflates/
No one saw those Trump-era spy balloons, and US officials knew nothing about them. But Biden’s unnamed officials learned all about them after Trump was out of office.
What an amazing technology we have developed that can detect balloons years after they have been somewhere.
Many named, verifiable sources vs. one unverifiable anonymous source 'quoted' in a propaganda rag known for lies.
Hard choice on who to believe.
Going boldly where man has stumbled before.
https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/world-walking-ww3-eyes-wide-open-un-chief-tells-general-assembly
"The prospects for peace keep diminishing," Guterres said. "The chances of further escalation and bloodshed keep growing." He then sounded the alarm that "I fear the world is not sleepwalking into a wider war. I fear it is doing so with its eyes wide open."
Send Biden milley pelisi swawel, all of their staff and all of their families and put them on the front line in Ukraine. That will be the best way to avoid ww3
Just send Hunter and a pallet of cash.
In fact, the only resolution I see is for Ukraine to make painful territorial and political concessions to Russia.
What does Ukraine have to do with the war in Ukraine? They need to butt out, it's none of their business.
She apparently wants to do this too but Biden says no. Milley has even requested that Biden allow peace talks but as usual, Brandon knows better.
Dems scared of future with Biden.
https://www.zerohedge.com/political/big-majority-dems-dont-want-biden-run-again-ap-norc-poll
The trend is as bad as the headline number, as Democrat enthusiasm for Biden 2024 has plummeted since October. Today, only 37% of Democrats want him to run again, down from 52% in the run-up to the midterms.
And then they have to scuttle Harris somehow, which is going to get ugly. It's gonna be so fun to watch this 2024 election cycle.
This would be an admission that skin color and genitalia are less important that ability, that meritocracy has merit. The progressives will burn unrelated businesses. Reasonmag will make false equivalence arguments. And the DNC will deny it the next time a 'poc' is the only person selected for a position.
Great, now Fiona will be happy as a clam.
https://www.thecentersquare.com/texas/border-patrol-presentation-reveals-plan-to-release-illegal-crossers-en-masse-into-u-s-communities/article_1dca09e8-a6e5-11ed-844b-1b75d227eada.html
Roughly six weeks before testifying Tuesday before the House Committee on Oversight and Accountability, Chief Border Patrol Agent Gloria Chavez held a meeting with local law enforcement in Weslaco, Texas, describing the administration’s plan to release en masse illegal foreign nationals into the U.S. when Title 42 ended.
Let's send them all to Fiona's house. Assuming she is a real human.
Squeezy the Pension Python strikes again.
https://www.illinoispolicy.org/state-retirees-get-nearly-40-more-than-what-working-illinoisans-earn/
The typical career government worker in Illinois collects nearly 40% more from a state pension system than the typical Illinoisan earns working.
What do you call an employed person in Illinois?
A sucker.
And that's how you socialist paradise.
Unfortunately, the analysis in that article is sloppy. First, the kinds of jobs government workers and the median Illinois worker performs are different. Second, it treats retirement savings without any kind of interest.
Illinois pensions are almost certainly way too high, but if you want to change that, you need to get your numbers right.
Armed guards for your eggs and gas, but not your kids.
https://www.illinoispolicy.org/illinois-house-bill-would-force-chicago-grocers-gas-stations-to-hire-armed-guards/
Illinois state lawmakers are pondering a bill that would force Chicago grocery stores, gas stations, banks and pawn shops to hire their own armed security guards to cover all hours they are open to the public.
What's the point if they'll get arrested for shooting back?
There is no shooting, guns are banned in Chicago, doncha know.
Just follow the mayor’s idea, stop using cash!
And have an 80 cop personal protection brigade
Don't forget her Beetlejuice powers.
Who thinks kids warrant protection?
I guess we know where Ubalde's police chief heads to next.
thats kinda of a libertarian idea except for teh part where they, government, still get their protection. people need to ask if these places are now allowed to have self protection why are not all private citizens allowed to protect themselves with guns
Because "all people" can't join the armed guards union and contribute to democrats.
Duh.
A Republican Congress that wants to cut spending? Did I die and go to heaven last night? Amazing. And it's led by McCarthy of all people. I swear I've been kidnapped by aliens and flown off to their planet or something.
Four years of a Republican White House, House, and Senate, and every time I suggested cutting spending I was told by the commentariat to shut the fuck up.
But we'll see if they are serious or just pandering again.
A Republican Congress that wants to cut spending?
Sounds too good to be true, right?
Except they don't specify any cuts. They want the Dems to do that.
It's a post by turd; it's a lie.
Republicans only want to cut spending when they can't. Soon as they have the power to actually pass legislation they spend as much as Democrats.
The three idiots want higher taxes.
There are 20 years of proposals for deficit reduction from the right. There are zero years for the left.
You idiots focus on how the right is the bad one here. Amazing.
There are 20 years of proposals for deficit reduction from the right.
My dog barks at the Amazon delivery guy from inside; teeth showing and hair standing up. He runs and hides if he’s outside when the delivery comes. Either way, we get our package.
Again, they have never had isolated control. The only deficit balancing plans are coming from the right. Often at expense of elections when the media attacks them for debt ceiling hold ups. Even now half the media is attacking them for SS and Medicare despite Mccarthy saying they are off the table. Ironically as Biden looks to gut Medicare Advantage which is actually a slight savings for taxpayer dollars.
Youre blaming then for accomplishing the impossible. There have been cuts in many areas, just not large ones due to DNC voting no and the media hyping up cuts as grave. The fact you blame the GOP for the actions, seemingly, is strange.
Remember this tweet?
Donald J. Trump @realDonaldTrump
Budget Deal is phenomenal for our Great Military, our Vets, and Jobs, Jobs, Jobs! Two year deal gets us past the Election. Go for it Republicans, there is always plenty of time to CUT!
10:30 AM · Aug 1, 2019
You were told to shut up in 2003 to 2007?
Shameful!
I ask because it is the only time what you said was true.
Let's see who goes after this.
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/record-number-americans-worse-off-joe-biden-poll
According to the ABC News/Washington Post poll, 41% of Americans say they are in a tougher financial situation since Biden's inauguration in Jan. 2021, while just 16% say they are better off.
And by 16% , they mean the 1%.
Far right couple planned to blow up power stations
A neo-Nazi couple recently out of prison may soon be back behind bars after they allegedly blabbed to an undercover informant last month that they planned to sabotage power stations in Maryland.
...........
Brandon Russell, 27, and his girlfriend Sarah Clendaniel, 34, are accused of plotting to shoot up five substations that serve the Baltimore area—an attack Clendaniel told a federal informant would “completely destroy Baltimore,” said Erek L. Barron, U.S. Attorney for the District of Maryland.
.............
Russell, a neo-Nazi leader who founded the far-right group Atomwaffen, had been jailed in 2018 for keeping lethal bomb-making materials in his apartment. Atomwaffen has been known to threaten journalists, African American churches and Jewish organizations. Clendaniel was locked up in a different prison for a spate of convenience store robberies where she wielded a machete and demanded cash and cigarettes.
https://www.thedailybeast.com/neo-nazis-brandon-russell-sarah-clendaniel-arrested-for-plot-to-blow-up-baltimore-power-grid
Gay Georgia couple adopted boy and pimped him out to other pedophiles. After their arrest, Sloppy Pluggo hardest hit.
Since when are “far right” nazis?
Since about 1925.
FRONTLINE: Germany's Neo-Nazis & The Far Right
https://www.kpbs.org/news/arts-culture/2021/06/28/frontline-germanys-neo-nazis-far-right
This is more about tensions between parts of German society and the Islamic immigrants they've gotten in the past couple of decades.
The film examines the murder of nine people in Hanau, Germany, six of them Muslim and all of them of migrant backgrounds, by a shooter who had posted an anti-immigrant manifesto online two weeks before — and had even sent links to his website to government officials.
It actually has little to do with the direct connection between Hitler and the modern German anti-immigrant folks.
Sloppy Pluggo supports immigration when it involves boys traveling unaccompanied by adults.
Does that include sleep-overs? Asking for the ghost of Michael Jackson.
Sleepover bedtime at Sloppy Pluggo’s is when the big hand is on the little hand.
Gee, imagine catching turd in a lie!
Did you retire Drink acid and die? That was my favorite from years ago.
turd lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit.
turd lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit.
Let's dissect this, shall we?
1. It's from the Daily Beast which is well know for being ever-so-equal in its handling of right and left, NOT.
2. Before trying to carry out the attack, prosecutors say Clendaniel left a statement that referenced Hitler, the Unabomber, and a Norwegian mass killer, adding that she would sacrifice “everything” for “her people.”
This is just bizarre. The Unabomber was distinctly of the left, not the right. And the Norwegian mass killer was just a bit odd.
3. Clendaniel was locked up in a different prison for a spate of convenience store robberies where she wielded a machete and demanded cash and cigarettes.
She sounds far more like a garden variety armed robber than anything else.
Here's a different, sober story on the same thing, instead of the "foaming at the mouth" Daily Beast:
https://www.foxnews.com/us/fbi-arrests-man-woman-extremist-views-alleged-power-grid-attack-plot-targeting-5-substations
Clendaniel allegedly told an FBI confidential source that she planned to target five substations including in Norrisville, Reisterstown and Perry Hall, according to an affidavit by Special Agent Patrick W. Straub, of the Joint Terrorism Task Force ("JTTF") in the FBI Baltimore Division.
Regarding the Unabomber Wikipedia says:
A significant portion of the document (his Manifesto) is dedicated to discussing left-wing politics, with Kaczynski attributing many of society's issues to leftists.[82] He defines leftists as "mainly socialists, collectivists, 'politically correct' types, feminists, gay and disability activists, animal rights activists and the like".[83] He believes that over-socialization and feelings of inferiority are primary drivers of leftism,[77] and derides it as "one of the most widespread manifestations of the craziness of our world".[83] Kaczynski adds that the type of movement he envisions must be anti-leftist and refrain from collaboration with leftists, as, in his view, "leftism is in the long run inconsistent with wild nature, with human freedom and with the elimination of modern technology".[75] He also criticizes conservatives, describing them as "fools who whine about the decay of traditional values, yet ... enthusiastically support technological progress and economic growth", things he argues have led to this decay.[83]
83 = The New Yorker
The actual manifesto, Turd.
https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/fc-industrial-society-and-its-future
7. But what is leftism? During the first half of the 20th century leftism could have been practically identified with socialism. Today the movement is fragmented and it is not clear who can properly be called a leftist. When we speak of leftists in this article we have in mind mainly socialists, collectivists, “politically correct” types, feminists, gay and disability activists, animal rights activists and the like. But not everyone who is associated with one of these movements is a leftist. What we are trying to get at in discussing leftism is not so much a movement or an ideology as a psychological type, or rather a collection of related types. Thus, what we mean by “leftism” will emerge more clearly in the course of our discussion of leftist psychology. (Also, see paragraphs 227–230.)
8. Even so, our conception of leftism will remain a good deal less clear than we would wish, but there doesn’t seem to be any remedy for this
50. The conservatives are fools: They whine about the decay of traditional values, yet they enthusiastically support technological progress and economic growth. Apparently it never occurs to them that you can’t make rapid, drastic changes in the technology and the economy of a society without causing rapid changes in all other aspects of the society as well, and that such rapid changes inevitably break down traditional values.
97. Constitutional rights are useful up to a point, but they do not serve to guarantee much more than what might be called the bourgeois conception of freedom. According to the bourgeois conception, a “free” man is essentially an element of a social machine and has only a certain set of prescribed and delimited freedoms; freedoms that are designed to serve the needs of the social machine more than those of the individual.
217. In earlier revolutions, leftists of the most power-hungry type, repeatedly, have first cooperated with non-leftist revolutionaries, as well as with leftists of a more libertarian inclination, and later have double-crossed them to seize power for themselves. Robespierre did this in the French Revolution, the Bolsheviks did it in the Russian Revolution, the communists did it in Spain in 1938 and Castro and his followers did it in Cuba. Given the past history of leftism, it would be utterly foolish for non-leftist revolutionaries today to collaborate with leftists.
In other words, they were not pure enough.
He's really more anarchist than anything else.
Aw, turd caught lying AGAIN!
Ted Kaczynski wrote that?
That is actually fairly coherent.
Yes.
The unabomber wrote a lot.
I wonder what the ratio is of FBI agents to actual members of this "Atomwaffen" group.
are accused of plotting to shoot up five substations that serve the Baltimore area—an attack Clendaniel told a federal informant would “completely destroy Baltimore,”
I have a plan to blow up the Moon with a box of firecrackers and then flee in my spaceship to Omnicron Persei 8. I sure hope there are no FBI informants listening in here.
More than just balloons.
https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/think-threat-china-spy-flight-bad-much-worse-than-you-think
Downing the balloon should have been the president’s first action, not something he dithered on doing. It would have sent a signal to the American people and, more importantly, China, that such behavior would not be tolerated and that Washington could act decisively. Cancelling Secretary of State Antony Blinken’s visit to Beijing was neither decisive nor purposeful. It was the bare minimum expected of the White House, and something China almost certainly anticipated.
China is likely elated they don't have to put up with a dullard like Blinken.
If they had hosted him, they would have simply humiliated him anyway.
Disney's Florida fiefdom comes to an end.
https://www.foxbusiness.com/markets/disney-reedy-creek-improvement-district-new-name-governor-appointed-board
The bill seeks to make it so that the selection of the district’s five-member board of supervisors falls with the governor. Those governor-appointed members would also need Florida state Senate approval, according to the legislation’s currently-available text.
It proposes limiting the number of back-to-back terms a member can serve to three and doing four-year terms, "except that for the initial appointments made after the effective date of this act, two members shall be appointed to serve a term of 2 years," according to the text. The RCID website currently says its board of supervisors have staggered four-year terms. A current member of the board, Donald R. Greer, was first elected in 1975.
Disney once changed a planned housing development at Lake Buena Vista to a luxury resort because they realized that would put voters they could not control in the Reedy Creek District.
Disney bows to Beijing.
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-china-64550177
Disney has removed an episode of The Simpsons referring to Chinese labour camps from its streaming service in Hong Kong.
The absence of the One Angry Lisa episode in its latest season was flagged in media reports this week. It is unclear when it was removed.
Haven't they been bowing to the CCP for a while now?
Not as such. When Disney bends over for the CCP, it is facing away.
More along the lines of "thank you sir! May I have another?"
Yes. When they face towards the CCP, they are kneeling.
I wonder what Disney (at least the modern company) would have done to maintain market share in Germany in the 1930s and 40s.
'Senate Bill (S.B.) 147, introduced in November by state Sen. Lois Kolkhorst (R–Brenham), would bar any "individual who is a citizen of China, Iran, North Korea, or Russia" from buying property in Texas. S.B. 147 would also block government and corporate entities of those nations from purchasing or acquiring property in the state.'
That will just balance out the major US universities that have been busy selling themselves to foreign powers like China.
Meanwhile, in Colorado, Governor Dreamy announced that he will do everything to "protect" people from rising energy prices. While also telling people we must achieve 100% renewal energy even harder.
"Pro-gun judge, targeted by Newsome, might have supreme court on his side"
[...]
"It’s not generally prudent to criticize the umpire before the start of a ballgame, or the judge who’s expected to consider the constitutionality of the new law you’re proposing.
But Gov. Gavin Newsom didn’t mince words last week in referring to U.S. District Judge Roger Benitez of San Diego, who is likely to have the first look at gun groups’ challenge to a bill that would restrict the carrying of concealed firearms in public.
“Look forward toward Judge Benitez’s decision — it’s already been written,” Newsom said Wednesday at a news conference announcing the legislation, SB2 — portraying the judge as not only pro-gun but as so one-sided that he’s made up his mind and crafted his ruling long before the issue reaches his court..."
https://www.sfchronicle.com/politics/article/pro-gun-judge-targeted-by-newsom-might-have-the-17758117.php
Well, if you propose blatantly unconstitutional laws. you shouldn't be surprised when they are overturned.
Oh, and money pull-quote:
"...Another advocacy group, the Firearms Policy Coalition, called Newsom “just another opportunistic authoritarian politician with a hair stylist.” In the upcoming cases, the group said, “he will lose and he knows it.”
It would be great if he fines Newsom fore a frivolous law
Reason need a like button
amazing how often Democrats attack Judges. first it was Obama attacking the SC during a state of union speech then the whole media and dems attacking the SC over the roe v wade and now Newsome.
dont forget after citizens united. Hilary made it part of her presidential campaign to overturn it legislatively.
Note the headline has the judge as "pro gun" rather than "pro constitution".
The Chron lies almost as often as turd.
Benitez is the judge we dont deserve but i'm glad we have him. How did he even get into position is beyond me.
LFG.
Kim Jong Un abruptly reappears after 36 days out of the spotlight and orders North Korea to 'prepare for war'
https://news.yahoo.com/kim-jong-un-abruptly-reappears-121645221.html
He discovered that his love letters with Donnie went missing.
turd lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit.
Donnie is too old for you and you seem a bit too desperate.
Sloppy Pluggo has a tangerine colored dildo he refers to as Orange Man Oh So Good
It is his favorite toy.
Not what the article says at all, Pluggo.
The meeting comes as Pyongyang prepares to mark the 75th founding anniversary of the Korean People's Army on Wednesday, which will likely be celebrated with a military parade. Kim is expected to be there, NK News reported.
It's saber rattling and nothing more.
BTW, turd lies.
Probably in Biden's garage.
He also saw his shadow, which means six more weeks of nuclear winter.
Show of hands: Who’s actually going to watch the State of the Union Address? Anyone pudding down any bets as to content or number of gaffes? (Myself, I’m trying to figure out a drinking game for it…. It Depends on what rules one could play by )
1 gaff, that lasts an hour
One beer for each mistake, a straight shot for each outright lie, and jump out the window if he tells the truth?
I’m thinking very much along those same lines. The shots are small, but set aside a BIG shot of GOOD stuff—and if he says/does a certain ONE thing then it’s DRINK MOTHER FUCKER DRINK MOTHER FUCKER DRINK!!! But I’m undecided as to what that ONE thing should be?
You wouldn't survive the night. That much alcohol would be enough to kill an elephant.
Only sarc can handle that
I don't watch political speeches. Ever.
Too hard to watch and follow what ENB is tweeting so you just go by the tweets?
If the fake phony, fugazi libertarians of Reason really wanted fiscal responsibility, they would support Rand Paul's plan he put on the table about two weeks ago, which is an across the board 1 7% cut to everything (including defense, Social Security, and Medicare), and then keep the budget frozen at that dollar amount for the next five years.
But the fugazis do not support this plan and they will NEVER support this kind of plan. In fact, they either don't know that this plan exists, or even more likely, they don't want the more poorly informed readers among us to know that it exists.
The fugazis are all gaslighting bullshit con artists, and what they really want in the end is for the same thing to happen that almost always happens, which is for the republicans to cave and give Sleepy Joe and the far left everything they demand.
Yes, the House should vote on that tomorrow.
turd lies.
I'd be happy if they went for a quarter of that in cuts but repeat every year for four years same results but less firing upfront thus less harm to the economy than it already is.
How does freezing the budget "harm the economy"?
All government spending is harmful to the economy, and the more you reduce it, the better.
But I thought inflation is profit?
You: "Would you prefer a slow, painful death by being burned at the stake by government; or a slow, painful death by being tortured by government?" - Fugazis: "I would prefer not to be killed by government at all!" So - no we don't want the republicans to cave and we don't want Sleepy Joe to get anything that they demand. We would also prefer not to have the very bad things that will happen now if the debt ceiling is not raised OR the very bad things that will happen later if spending isn't cut. But we fugazis aren't likely to get ANY of the things we want, so why take it out on us?
Because you're a narcissistic moron who has no spine or value?
The section on the debt ceiling mentioned that the Democrats failed to raise taxes when they had control of both houses and the White House, but fails to mention that the Republicans failed to cut spending when THEY had control of both houses and the White House, plus they never went to the wall on debt ceiling increases when they could have done so at ANY time in the last two decades. Cowards indeed - ALL of them!
this its all theater all the time because if they ever did solve anything they would be out of work. you don't need mechanics when your car is running.
If we don't raise the debt ceiling, the federal government will not have enough money to pay off its obligations starting around June. This could set off a cascade of positive
negativeeconomic effects.There you go. fixed it for you.
the book gives no definite timeline for the crying wolf effectiveness.
As I have noted before this country is well past the choice of cutting spending or raising taxes. Both cuts and taxes will be required. Not to worry both taxes and cuts are hard work for a lazy Congress, and the status quo will remain.
BTW - everyone from every political angle says the US will not default, which mean the debt ceiling will be raised. So, Speaker McCarthy has no cards, and he might just get working on finding a dozen moderate Republican to vote with the Democrats.
We have true gridlock.
Since neither party wants to be blamed for spending cuts nothing materially different will happen.
To the credit of the GOP they are the better opposition party so the best gridlock is when the House is GOP.
turd lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a TDS-addled pile of shit, a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit.
No, they won’t. Debt is measured as a percentage of GDP. The primary way of getting rid of economically damaging debt is to grow the GDP. If we grow 5% more than interest rates, we cut the debt in half in about 15 years.
Raising taxes likely doesn’t even raise revenue, but it certainly will slow economic growth, making the debt problem worse, not better.
Furthermore, none of the current proposals even attempt to pay down the debt, whether they raise taxes or not. Growth is the only way we currently reduce debt.
Fuck you cut spending
^ This
In an act of desperation, the Republican led House could just pass the (used to be) normal budget bills, promising that the last one would raise the debt ceiling to the amount needed to cover the new budget. They have until June something or the other, right?
(And, oh by the way, claw back all unspent funds excused by the Communist Chinese Virus)
Head tax. Payable in cash or labor.
Google has released its own artificial intelligence tool, Bard, to compete with ChatGPT.
It's an arms race to out-wokify each other.
I get paid more than $90 to $400 per hour for working online. I heard about this job 3 months ago and after joining this I have earned easily $10k from this without having online working skills . Simply give it a shot on the accompanying site…
Here is I started.……………..>>> http://www.jobsrevenue.com
>>They also highlight absurdities in both parties' negotiating positions.
fuck you cut spending > debt spending
It's not even close. Stop spending our great grandkids' money please.
Harry Whittington, the Texas lawyer shot by Dick Cheney in 2006, dies at 95
USA Today
turd lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit.
rather hunt with Dick Cheney than roll with Teddy Kennedy
I rolled with Ted Kennedy once, but enough about that. It’s water under the bridge.
Indiana lawmakers move to legalize throwing stars.
this seems like a good idea. They passed constitutional carry and not two weeks later Elisjsha Dicken took down a wannabe mass shooter in the mall. Who knows what these ninja stars might be needed for ?
https://twitter.com/wil_da_beast630/status/1622974103501299720?t=FTPW5ks0o0w88TfJ3YE1vw&s=19
The "very lib" to "very con" gap in favor of supporting censorship of everyday classroom-style speech is 71% vs 14%.
It's remarkable how one-sided much authoritarianism turned out to BE, once we trimmed up the questions.
[Link]
But Trump is the dangerous authoritarian!!! TRUMP!!! LITERALLY HITLER!!!
I'd urge our fiscally conservative friends, if any such remain, to retire the "wasteful spending" trope.
The reason for our bloated government budgets isn't wasteful spending, in the sense of spending that benefits almost no one and that the vast majority of us would agree is useless and unnecessary. It's spending on things that are good in themselves, but that aren't so good or vital that they justify forcibly taking money, in the form of taxes, in order to pay for them.
We can't balance the budget or get spending under control just by eliminating fraud and waste, as much as we'd like to believe so. The only way to get our fiscal house in order is to acknowledge that we don't have enough money to buy all the good things that we'd like, and to distinguish between genuine necessities and things that're good and useful but not essential.
A democracy cannot exist as a permanent form of government. It can only exist until the majority discovers it can vote itself largess out of the public treasury. After that, the majority always votes for the candidate promising the most benefits with the result the democracy collapses because of the loose fiscal policy ensuing, always to be followed by a dictatorship, then a monarchy.
- often misattributed to Toqueville but whatever.
We are in the liminal space between "loose fiscal policy ensuing" and "dictatorship"
Your point is good, but I will counter: very few people, perhaps none, are saying that we can 'balance the budget or get spending under control just by eliminating fraud and waste.' That idea is one of several, and quite frankly, you'll find bipartisan support for it, once you leave the Beltway.
I get paid more than $90 to $400 per hour for working online. I heard about this job 3 months ago and after joining this I have earned easily $10k from this without having online working skills . Simply give it a shot on the accompanying site…
Here is I started.……………..>>> http://www.jobsrevenue.com
Going forward, Twitter will be broadly accepting of different values, rather than trying to impose its own specific values on the world
https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1623014136258117633?s=46&t=pAGmEdezb7iAgW7yFlSbEQ
followed by shrieks of purple-haired rage...
Their poor ears are hypersensitive to neo-Nazi dog whistles like the above.
Oh, ENB will NOT be happy. If Twitter won't shield her from icky conservative viewpoints, how will she spend her entire day reading Twitter without being offended?
Wonder if she ever called 911 after reading one of Trump’s tweets…unlikely but possible.
"Republicans and Democrats Face Impasse Over Cutting Spending Versus Raising Taxes"
The saddest thing is that rarely is ever government spending cut.
You can't even get gubment to cut the rate of growth, meaning they still get more just at a slower rate.
Both sides are the problem.
The way federal accounting runs, Medicare and Social Security are accounted for separately, and an improvement in that balance sheet would not improve the one at issue here. but that aside, what's absurd about proceeding from the general to the specific? If they can't get agreement on the general goal of reducing spending, there's no use arguing about specific cuts.
You would think free market libertarians would support cutting taxes to stimulate the economy rather than raising taxes and killing the economy forcing more tax raises. But then again there are no free market libertarians at Reason, just socialist dictatorship supporters.