COVID Made Us Sick, But Government Responses Crippled Our Liberty
Report author: “The COVID-19 pandemic was a catastrophe for human freedom.”

If you think that panicky and opportunistic pandemic policies have sucked freedom out of people's lives over the past few years, you're right! While the world's political leaders have long been tightening the screws on their suffering populations, COVID-19 gave too many of them an excuse to accelerate the process. According to the latest edition of the Human Freedom Index, published by America's Cato Institute and Canada's Fraser Institute, that makes life worse for almost everybody.
"In the year 2020, 94 percent of the world's population saw a fall in its freedom compared to the year before," Cato's Ian Vásquez, one of the authors of the index, wrote last week. "The annual Human Freedom Index, released today by the Cato Institute and the Fraser Institute, documents how the Covid-19 pandemic was a catastrophe for human freedom."
Grim as that is, it's a predicted acceleration of a preexisting downward slide for liberty. Last year, using data through 2019, Vásquez pointed out that "the vast majority of the world's population (83 percent) has seen a decline in freedom since 2008" and emphasized this is "a disturbing trend that was occurring even before the world experienced the COVID-19 pandemic and its social and political effects."
Now we know—as if we didn't already—that pandemic-era travel restrictions, mandated closures, and lockdowns affected even more people. And that larger proportion is less free than before.
"On a scale of 0 to 10, where 10 represents more freedom, the average human freedom rating for the 165 jurisdictions fell from 7.03 in 2019 to 6.81 in 2020," according to the index. "Most areas of freedom fell, including significant declines in the rule of law and freedom of movement, expression, association and assembly, and freedom to trade. Based on that coverage, 94.3 percent of the world's population lives in jurisdictions that saw a fall in human freedom from 2019 to 2020, with 148 jurisdictions decreasing their ratings and 16 improving."
The world rating compiled by Human Freedom Index scholars hit a peak in 2007, at 7.33, and has declined in fits and starts since then. But it absolutely plunged with the appearance of COVID-19 and, most importantly, political responses to the virus.
Long before 2020, though, the United States had fallen from the top 10 and it slipped another seven positions in the latest edition to 23. Canada fell six positions to 13 (and this is before the Trudeau government weaponized the financial system against Freedom Convoy protesters). With Mexico down three positions to 98, North America isn't looking good.
The current top-ranked countries are Switzerland, New Zealand, Estonia, Denmark, Ireland, Sweden, Iceland, Finland, the Netherlands, and Luxembourg. Note that these are relative rankings; every single one of the top-ten countries actually saw a drop in its score. The most highly ranked country to improve its score was Bhutan, which jumped 17 spots to 86 with an improvement of 0.03.
Happy 2023, by the way.
To compile the Index, Fraser and Cato scholars use 83 indicators of personal, civic, and economic freedom that measure freedom from government, not politicians' conceits about "freeing" us from daily concerns by fiddling with our lives without individual consent.
"Freedom in our usage is a social concept that recognizes the dignity of individuals and is defined by the absence of coercive constraint," the authors write. "Freedom thus implies that individuals have the right to lead their lives as they wish as long as they respect the equal rights of others."
The Human Freedom Index isn't alone in finding that liberty has been eroding in the world for many years, and that this sad phenomenon was accelerated by pandemic responses.
"The pandemic has resulted in an unprecedented withdrawal of civil liberties among developed democracies and authoritarian regimes alike," cautioned The Economist's Democracy Index 2021. This "compounded many pre-pandemic trends such as an increasingly technocratic approach to managing society in Western democracies, and a tendency in many non-consolidated democracies or authoritarian regimes to resort to coercion."
"As COVID-19 spread during the year, governments across the democratic spectrum repeatedly resorted to excessive surveillance, discriminatory restrictions on freedoms like movement and assembly, and arbitrary or violent enforcement of such restrictions by police and nonstate actors," Freedom House observed in 2021.
"The present threat to democracy is the product of 16 consecutive years of decline in global freedom. A total of 60 countries suffered declines over the past year, while only 25 improved," the organization noted in last year's report.
Even for those who don't value freedom in itself, growing authoritarianism has unpleasant implications. The authors of the Human Freedom Index emphasize that more-free countries have much higher per capita income than less-free countries. Freedom also strongly correlates with greater democracy. Overall, this suggests "that freedom plays an important role in human well-being," they add.
The why of long-term decline in human liberty is a subject of debate among experts. It's worth noting that public support for free speech and liberal democracy are shaky at best in many places, which certainly eases the way for thuggish political leaders.
But the accelerating effect of pandemic responses on the erosion of freedom was both foreseeable and foreseen. Crises often empower governments to increase their reach, and they rarely return to old bounds after the emergency passes.
"The pandemic of COVID-19 coronavirus threatens a world-wide wave of sickness, but it's the healthiest thing to happen to government power in a very long time," I warned in March 2020. "As it leaves government with a rosy glow, however, our freedom will end up more haggard than ever." Weeks later, I added that the "virus would threaten to turn the Land of the Free into a command society where what we do is directed and paid for by the state."
It's obvious now that the real plague of the past few years was less COVID-19 than governments' exploitation of public health fears to further expand their already excessive power. Freedom, which was already ailing, shows no signs of improving health.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Google pay 200$ per hour my last pay check was $8500 working 1o hours a week online. My younger brother friend has been averaging 12000 for months now and he works about 22 hours a week. I cant believe how easy it was once I tried it outit.. ???? AND GOOD LUCK.:)
https://WWW.APPRICHS.com
Hard to believe New Zealand and the Netherlands are among the most free countries. How bad are the rest of them?
I get paid over 190$ per hour working from home with 2 kids at home. I never thought I’d be able to do it but my best friend earns over 10k a month doing this and she convinced me to try. The potential with this is endless. Heres what I’ve been doing..
HERE====)> http://WWW.NETPAYFAST.COM
Just came out the UK military was spying on citizens against lockdowns. So seemingly they are all terrible.
Reason is also a few years late on this take.
After supporting most of the false narratives and acting as de facto boosters for the people implementing these policies.
Great article, Mike. I appreciate your work, I’m now creating over $35,300 dollars each month simply by doing a simple job online! I do know You currently making a lot of greenbacks online from $28,300 dollars, its simple online operating jobs.
.
.
Just open the link—————————————>>> http://Www.SmartJob1.Com
Nothing says 'freedom' like shutting the borders completely and disarming the population.
Comrade, your only real freedoms are through the great chain of socialism with binds us all. Except Uzbeks. They are the weak link.
There is no problem at all in those countries.
The Dutch farmers and New Zealand COVID spikes would like to have a word with you.
It's obvious now
now
Now?
Was about to say, this article is close to three years late.
Reason didn't notice until Cato published a scholarly study with asterisks and footnotes and multi syllable words. Having read it like literally dozens of other people, JD exclaimed "Wow. I had no idea this was going on. I'll have to share this with my colleagues at the next Reason cocktail party. They'll be shocked!"
Home earnings allow all people to paint on-line and acquire weekly bills to financial institutions. Earn over $500 each day and get payouts each week instantly to account for financial institutions. (bwj-03) My remaining month of earnings was $30,390 and all I do is paint for as much as four hours an afternoon on my computer. Easy paintings and constant earnings are exquisite with this job.
More information→→→→→ https://WWW.DAILYPRO7.COM
You won't believe #6!
I agree with CATO. It would have been much better if 6 million more Americans had died.
Only worldwide lockdowns could do that death number. In fact that’s exactly what happened.
You were a conspiracy theorist for recognizing it before today. Ask sarc.
And you were a good citizen for supporting the party line, in spite of any evidence against it.
You know where else good citizens supported the party?
Delta House?
Ahem. It is a bit late for this.
Up next, Reason’s big movie reveal that Darth Vader is Luke Skywalker’s father!
SPOILER ALERT.
What the hell man.
Settle down. I expect a remake of Star Wars will improve major characters with new fluid genders and personal lived histories. Or, in Darth Vader's case, when his helmet comes off, we will see Trump's face.
Too scary!
Perhaps a movie that explains the first movie, watered and dumbed down for millennials? It could be called Rouge Won.
Or, in Darth Vader’s case, when his helmet comes off, we will see Trump’s face.
Nope, Vader was redeemed. Trump can not be redeemed.
He'd be a black man if they remade it today, and Luke would be a latina. True story.
Is it ever too late to say you're sorry?
If they were apologetic, I’d be good with it. Acting like this is new info while ignoring their previous support isn’t good enough. Says me.
Not a single outlet has issued a mea culpa, including reason.
This crap was obvious 2+ years ago.
sarc will claim new facts…such as Reason now saying this.
Everyone who saw the evidence and understood the facts before today is a conspiracy theorist. It isnt sarc is an utter moron, biased to the left, hates everyone who recognized it... no you believe in conspiracies.
Even worse, is his (and Mikey's) refusal to admit they were wrong.
They both still defend the government's tyrannic reaction to covid.
It is like Bill Gates interview where he finally admitted the vaccines aren't great even though he pushed mandates for 3 years. Refused to admit others were right.
sarc is due to his ego. Mike I think is an agent so that is the part he is playing.
I've thought that more than once. He has the mentality and intelligence of a fed.
Not a government agent. Maybe some researcher here that assists the editors or a fifty center for WEF/a Soros type.
So, dumber than a fed?
It all makes sense now.
I was thinking agent from the matrix
I am making $92 an hour working from home. I never imagined that it was honest to goodness yet my closest companion is earning $16,000 a month by working on a laptop, that was truly astounding for me, she prescribed for me to attempt it simply. Everybody must try this job now by just using this website. http://Www.workstar24.com
Pretty sure Mike conditions himself to believe what he is commanded to believe by The Party. My leftist aunt is the same way.
Where do you girls get this stuff? I’ve never defended lockdowns or masking or any of that crap. Someone like JesseAz or Mother's Lament makes something up, and then it becomes fact because it’s repeated ad nauseum. When there isn’t a single quote from me to back it up. You girls are worse than a sewing circle.
LOL
It helps to read the comment you are making inferences about. And yes I can post you defending Australian covid camps as "just quarantine" and attacking those against masks and who said vaccines did not work well.
“When there isn’t a single quote from me to back it up.”
Most of the regulars comment hundreds of times a day here. how is anyone supposed to bookmark every comment so they can quote it back at you (royal you) later? That seems like an impossible task.
I have quoted him his past statements. He denies them. Such as him defending Australian "quarantine" camps against attacks.
https://reason.com/2021/11/24/ahmaud-arbery-alleged-murderers-almost-escaped-charges-prosecutorial-misconduct-jackie-johnson-george-barnhill/?comments=true#comment-9228119
Or his attacking those pointing out masks don't do much of anything. Also defending vaccines and their narratives against correct information.
https://reason.com/2021/08/30/alex-berenson-twitter-ban-vaccine-covid/?comments=true#comment-9074731
If I'm the hardcore leftist that they try to portray me as, you'd think that they could find one single sentence of mine to back up their myriad claims. The fact that they cannot is proof that they are liars. Yet they are treated the same way that courts and the media treat cops. As if they cannot tell a lie.
I posted 2. Do you want more?
the problem is that they do not understand what the color grey is. if you have ever at any point said something to the effect that "it might be a good idea to make the personal decision to get vaccinated," what they hear is that you are a hard core lefty who supports every extreme over reach of the government in response to the pandemic.
basically, if you have ever failed their purity test, you believe 100% of everything they hate. any more nuance than that is too complicated for them to understand.
Seems to be the case. Especially when the arguments against what you didn't say are so well rehearsed.
The lies you idiots tell yourselves to justify being incorrect and ignoring evidence is amazing.
I thought about Keeping a list of all his comments. Then I realized that it would be a complete waste of my time. Like everything else where he’s concerned.
So where were you with this during the lockdown? The closest I can recall is gushing over how great it is for homeschooling and a lot if finger wagging at governors that didn't lockdown their populace.
Quite a few of us commenters were saying that these lockdowns were completely pointless.
But the writers...they are the real libertarians...
Yeah, Reason writers prattling on about "misinformation" narrative regarding all things covid, and deliberately pushing the "safe and effective" bullshit.
They questioned nothing for two years.
They *still* aren't questioning anything.
Assuming Reason were some grassroots, independent, libertarian vox populi, what possible ideological reason would they have for refraining from saying "Investigate Fauci"? He's an unelected bureaucrat who's head of oversight was his spouse, both of whom are retiring with full government bennies despite decades of criminal incompetence that cost millions of lives complete with vows to do the same thing again.
Maybe, there's some pragmatic reason why they aren't saying it. Though, with the breadth and depth of offenses, it seems hard that there's not some pragmatic libertarian case against him *somewhere*. But if you're broadly and consistently letting pragmatics pre-empt your ideological ethos, you kinda have to wonder what kind of actual libertarian vox populi you really are.
Now, if you're the magazine or journalist of choice when Fauci needs a softball interview, you aren't libertarian or the vox populi or caught balancing pragmatism vs. ideology or anything remotely torturous and principled like that. You're just yet another propaganda outlet.
Slow pitch softball interview.
So safe and effective that indemnity from lawsuit required by the manufacturer before getting vaccinated. Nothing weird about that.
This applies to ALL vaccines in the US.
Not just covid.
Someone's gotta be Gov----> GUN forced to make all the *free* ponies.
Endless DEMANDS without any recognition of a SUPPLY.
Self-entitled cognitive dissonance.
As usual the idiots in the comments can't tell when an author is writing something original, or writing about something someone else wrote. So they whine and complain that the author didn't write about this earlier, when the article is in fact about something that just recently came out from Cato. So as usual they look like a bunch of fools as they bitch and moan about how the article should have been written years ago. I wish I could say I'd expect better from them, but I don't.
That you, Diogenes?
Need a light?
*snort*
No point in looking for a honest man among this bunch.
Honesty. Like disagreeing with shrike then turning immediately to calling people who disagree with him as liars in the same thread?
https://reason.com/2023/01/25/doj-antitrust-suit-seeks-to-end-google-ad-dominance-the-market-is-already-taking-care-of-that/?comments=true#comment-9895670
Can I have a chortle to go with that "snort?"
Soon you'll be full on Hihn.
You beat me to it. Hihn was the first thing I thought of when I read that.
“Smirk’
Do you have a cite of him writing about it earlier as per your claim?
It should have been as obvious to CATO three years ago as it was to the “idiots in the comments”. Especially since they’re supposed to be a Libertarian think tank.
And while this report might be new, it’s not like Reason, the Libertarian Party, or any of the big Libertarian players were out there screaming from the roof tops what a fucking travesty to freedom this was going to be. Which, again, was fucking obvious three goddamn years ago.
I'm calling the people in the comments idiots because they can't tell the difference between an original story and a report on something someone else wrote. To do that they've got to be functional retards or pathological liars. I know there's a lot of the latter going on, but that can't explain it all. There's got to be some serious stupidity in the mix as well.
That's a lot of projection from you who has consistently been on the wrong side of things the last half decade.
"While the world's political leaders have long been tightening the screws on their suffering populations, COVID-19 gave too many of them an excuse to accelerate the process."
Duh. Never waste a good crisis. And, if necessary, create and inflate one. And then extend it by any means necessary.
Of course, when the true objective is power and control, the immediate crisis response is just a cover.
I can't accurately predict if Reason is more likely to be put up against a wall and shot by members of their own party, insurrectionists, revolutionists, or other.
However, I can predict that for the subsequent 3 yrs., they will be utterly baffled as to why it happened.
It's obvious now that the real plague of the past few years was less COVID-19 than governments' exploitation of public health fears to further expand their already excessive power.
"It's obvious that the plague of the past few years was less an actual disease and less government exploitation of people's fears to expand their already excessive power as they are *always* want to do, than it was the Media's, including this magazine, superlatively immoral participation, justification, defense, deflection, and backhanded apologizing for every inch of it." - J.D. Tuccille circa 2026 - Never
Apologizing could use some quotation marks, or you could qualify it. It's half-assed, dishonest, when it happens, which is rare enough to be called never.
"Backhanded", as in "not sincere" or "in a threatening, abusive, or insulting manner".
“While the world’s political leaders have long been tightening the screws on their suffering populations, COVID-19 gave too many of them an excuse to accelerate the process.”
Along about March '20, I claimed it is going to take a year to claw back the freedoms we're losing every month, and it seems we're still on the 'losing' part of the curve.
These folks: https://pacificlegal.org/ seemed the only ones taking it seriously, and they get my support as a result.
Good one JD -- It's scary that so few people in power and in the mainstream media saw the threat to freedom posed by the war on covid when it was declared in the early spring of 2020. War is the health of the state, Bourne said, and it doesn't just mean military adventures abroad and gigantic defense departments. The federal wars on terrorism, drugs, alcohol, gambling, poverty, pollution etc. each enlarged state power. The war on covid declared by our public health generals and petty tyrants in charge allowed the state to impose sweeping restrictions on our basic freedoms that in many ways were worse than those imposed during WWII. My generation -- the spoiled Boomers -- let it happen and should forever be ashamed of itself, but of course it never will. https://clips.substack.com/p/so-sorry-for-the-shutdown-kids
Who's Bourne? I didn't see a quote in the article.
Google pays an hourly wage of $100. My most recent online earnings for a 40-hour work week were $3500. According to my younger brother’s acquaintance, he works cs-02 roughly 30 hours each week and earns an average of $12,265. I’m in awe of how simple things once were.
.
.
See this article for more information————————>>>GOOGLE WORK
O/T: Pro abolish and rewrite the constitution article from MSNBC, connecting Peru Maoists to U.S. Democrats and systemic racism
https://www.msnbc.com/opinion/msnbc-opinion/violence-perus-indigenous-protesters-outrage-rcna67234
'Long-term decline in human liberty,' Studiously ignored by the 'editors' at reasonmag, when not excused ('there is more than one definition of insurrection') or supported. Applauded by so many of the left-leaning/progressive commentariat here and on volokh, it appears universal. This latter view is reflected in sociopolitical groups and media -reasonmag chose cowardice, standing w/ the crowd mouthing lies.
Next up on Reason: The House Progressive Caucus, who identify in the open as socialists, are really socialists
S H o c K i n G
More than likely if such an article was written then it would mostly be about how libertarians agree with and should be working with the socialists.
Hey, I was allowed to pull down my mask to lick their boots. Who needs freedumbs when you can be safey safe.
Everyone who complains about the now-moot hygiene measures taken during a deadly global pandemic I will assume is a disgusting pig who never showers. You don't actually believe that minor hygiene adjustments during a pandemic are a threat to individual freedom forever. You're just wiping Republican ass, bandwagoning along with the thread they pull out of reality to wholly invent something to whine about in pursuit of political power they can't win on actual ideas.
Ah, a euphemism that eugenicists and Nazis have been fond of for more than a century.
No, wearing a mask when there's a deadly airborne virus afoot is a minor hygiene measure. So my only question is which other, more complicated hygiene measures do you neglect?
The purpose of masks was never to protect the wearer. The purpose was to stop a sick wearer from spreading the disease. The only possible way masks could have an effect would be to catch a sick person's sneeze and prevent it from landing on a healthy person. That's it. And that assumes they actually accomplish their intended purpose, which is another debate all by itself. Under any other circumstance they serve no purpose. Which makes them more of a pointless decoration than a hygiene measure.
I don't understand your point. What other circumstance? The circumstance was an airborne contagion, and then intent is to mitigate the spread of it.
Even if in contravention of the laws of physics they had absolutely no effect, it's only a fucking face mask. I'm supposed to listen to endless years of whining about this by the same people who wholesale dismiss the legitimate civil rights grievances of others?
Even if in contravention of the laws of physics they had absolutely no effect, it’s only a fucking face mask.
Even if it screws up the outfit, what does it matter? It's only a yellow star.
I have increasingly little patience for weak people who want me to care that they’re put upon by minor hygiene measures. Tell me about how you’re squeamish in a locker room with a gay person too. I don’t care. Be less weak.
The dark irony of your hysterical self-crucifying Holocaust comparison is that conservatives’ deadly wrong opinions all throughout this crisis have led to their own measurably higher death rates. They ghettoized then Holocausted themselves.
I have increasingly little patience for weak people who want me to care that they’re put upon by minor hygiene measures.
I don't accept the premise that it's a minor hygiene measure. You just admitted that you don't care if it is medically effective or not. If that's the case then hygiene has nothing to do with it. At this point is may as well be a yellow star.
The dark irony of your hysterical self-crucifying Holocaust comparison is that conservatives’ deadly wrong opinions all throughout this crisis have led to their own measurably higher death rates.
So? I don't care. That's their problem.
It was a minor hygiene measure for me. As far as I know, we lived through the same pandemic and wore roughly the same type of mask.
I'm sorry you're weak. Cry to someone who enjoys being around weak people, maybe?
You just said it doesn’t matter if it’s effective or not. That means it’s not hygiene. It’s virtue signaling. For the most part I went along and wore one when people posted signs saying it was required. Didn't want to rock the boat. Maybe that does make me weak, compared to those who flat out refused and suffered the consequences.
Masks are effective, though. Even if they were totally useless, it's hardly literally the Holocaust. There weren't actually separate rules for conservatives and liberals. There was just an excess of whining from conservatives.
You tell me what the difference is between this and being expected to wash your hands after you shit. You're probably not going to be arrested, but you surely can't also expect to be welcomed into polite society no questions asked.
Even if they were totally useless, it’s hardly literally the Holocaust.
How do you keep your strawmen so erect? Never mind. I don't want to know.
You brought up the gold star. Why don't you find the nearest Jew and explain to him your brilliant insight about how wearing a spittle shield for half an hour is comparable to being systematically genocided.
"...Cry to someone who enjoys being around weak people, maybe?..."
This from the slave happy to crawl around on his knees if the authorities 'request it'.
I’m supposed to listen to endless years of whining about this by the same people who wholesale dismiss the legitimate civil rights grievances of others?
I'd respond to that but I don't speak Word Salad.
"Racism is over. Stop whining. Pay attention to my grievance now: being asked to wash my hands after shitting. I am the Braveheart of communicable disease!"
No, you're a lying, sanctimonious pile of lefty shit.
The CDC insisted on treating the particles containing the virus as droplets when all evidence was in favor of the particles being aerosols. The difference is that no cloth mask or surgical mask can stop the spread of aerosols. Social distancing is significant for droplets, but utterly useless for aerosols whose concentration is dependent upon air circulation in an entire closed area, not on distance between people.
The CDC was arguing against its own position of ten years ago solely for political, not scientific, reasons.
The CDC and all federal health related agencies must be abolished due to an incurable infection of power hunger.
Weird, I posted above where you claimed how people against masks were incorrect wrong. Are you admitting they may have been right now?
JesseAz, please go away. You're Lucy holding a football, and I'm not Charlie Brown. I do not read your posts and I will not respond to them. They are nothing but clutter on the screen. Unless you revel in being a teenage boy with a straw and some paper, pretend to be an adult and leave me alone.
Why should I listen to a drunk who can’t stand the sight of people pointing out his hypocrisy? I mean your arguments against Tony are literally the ones you attacked for a year. See post above.
Except for the minor detail that masks have over a century of studies proving they accomplish nothing, and in fact are actually worse than nothing?
I take it 'believe the science' is only your motto when it happens to justify the state doing whatever you feel is right absent any actual evidence.
https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/science/science-briefs/masking-science-sars-cov2.html
The CDC has been consistently wrong on the issue since 2020, hence why he noted the 100 years of studies regarding it. They even continue to ignore current studies showing no correlation between mass usage and infection rates in society.
Every major medical science outfit seems to be saying that masks have some effectiveness in preventing Covid spread.
Even if you're maximally skeptical of this rather obvious conclusion, if you're acting in good faith, you must leave room for understanding if people preferred to be extra cautious. After all, the only times I was ever required to wear a mask was when I was entering a private business, and surely you think private businesses should be able to set their own rules about these things.
So the regime we got, where masks were largely left up to private discretion, seems, if anything, to have tilted in the freedom direction rather than pro-safety one.
Aren't you worried that you're spending so much time complaining about nothing that you're neglecting some of the real problems in the world?
Every major medical science outfit seems to be saying that masks have some effectiveness in preventing Covid spread.
Paper medical masks ~11%
Cloth: 0%
Citation needed.
It's not my business what minor inconvenience you decide to make the civil rights crusade of the century in your own head. But don't expect me to take you seriously when you demand that others sit down and shut up when they have real grievances.
You keep using that word, grievances. I do not think it means what you think it means.
Wrong in the sense that nothing happened to you that didn't happen to anyone else? The only difference between you and normal people being the amount of whining you do about minor inconveniences?
Grievances can be and often are imagined. Not that you imagined this one. You outsourced your imagination to Murdoch media or whatever, and they told you want to think.
"...The only difference between you and normal people being the amount of whining you do about minor inconveniences?..."
No, the difference is between a knee-walking piece of camp-dust like you and a human.
Every in China is and was wearing masks.
Almost everyone in China is infected.
Explain.
I neglect all health panacea measures.
That's good since nobody offered a panacea. Except maybe the vaccine.
Whatever, Rachel Maddow... I mean Rochelle Walensky, I mean Anthony Fauci... keep telling us the virus *stops* with each vaccinated person.
What do you mean stops? Do you know how viruses and vaccines work?
Apparently Fauci, Walensky and you don't.
Cons can't conceive of a reality in which there aren't identifiable human agents lurking behind everything. Even the universe itself had to have an anthropomorphic agent behind it.
I suppose, even when these figures are acting nefariously, it's more comforting than a universe in which nature just sometimes randomly fucks with us.
I'm still not hearing anything other than "I'm weak and I don't want to be judged for it."
"...Cons can’t conceive of a reality in which there aren’t identifiable human agents lurking behind everything..."
This from someone claiming some degree of education.
Ever hear of that guy Stalin, shitbag?
Face diapers and injections. When I had the mild flu, I stayed home for a few days.
Well, let's see. No mask, no underwear, no deoderant, no toothpaste, no wiping of ass. Does that cover the scenario in your leftist mind? Fuck the masks, fuck the jab juice. You do you, and I'll do me. THEY NEVER WORKED TO BEGIN WITH. Clown.
It's not Republican areas having people shitting in the street.
Just sayin'.
Republican areas are where there's a statistically significant greater death rate from Covid, even though they live in the fucking country.
Man you guys really are still pushing that study where even the abstract says not to draw broad conclusions.
Is it a broad conclusion that hysterical anti-vaccine nutters die more of the disease the vaccine protects against? Sounds like basic math to me.
Except they don't.
I bet you were an expert at skyscraper engineering after 9/11 too.
And you would have turned in Anne Frank, we all have our foibles.
You guys comparing yourselves to Jews in the Holocaust is actually insane.
We all went through the same pandemic. Some of us handled it with more strength of character than others.
At least we know who we absolutely won’t be able to count on during the next crisis that comes around. Do you people think perhaps you could be both useless and silent next time?
Can you limit your cowering under the bed to yourself and not demand the world do it too?
But I'm not the one hysterically crying over a temporary accoutrement.
The people who refused to wear masks had more courage than you.
Doesn't sound like it. Sounds like they were being pissy-pants little girls.
Is that how you'd describe a surgeon who refuses to wear a mask? Brave?
It's always so amusing how much selective shame conservatives feel. They are actually still freaking out over a little social awkwardness during the pandemic, yet look at how they dress and behave normally.
Is that how you’d describe a surgeon who refuses to wear a mask? Brave?
That's just dumb. Comparing grocery shopping to surgery. I don't have enough energy to entertain your hyperbole anymore. Have a good afternoon.
I had to go grocery shopping too.
To repeat: the only difference between us is which one is complaining incessantly about the thing we both had to do, and which one of us isn't bothered.
"...the only difference between us is which one is complaining incessantly about the thing we both had to do, and which one of us isn’t bothered..."
No, the difference is between a knee-walking piece of camp-dust like you and a human.
Not only broad but wrong. Especially given CDC now admitting their covid death count is wrong.
I have never been vaxed and never contracted any of those illnesses. I refuse to stick anything in my body the government recommends. No juice, still here.
Follow the science harder, Tony.
There was no evidence that insisting everyone wear a mask would help in 2020 and there still isn't now.
Sure there is. https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/science/science-briefs/masking-science-sars-cov2.html
There's also plenty of evidence that you must not have any real problems in life if a minor hygiene measure is the biggest civil rights struggle of your time.
The CDC to this day has refused to do a Randomized Control Trial for masks. They're lying to you, just like they lied that the vaccine stopped transmission.
Randomized control trials that have been done have shown that masks work very little at best, and cloth masks (the mask Anthony Fauci wore for two years on my television screen) were 0% effective.
Oh, White House COVID czar agrees with me:
“There is no study in the world that shows that masks work that well,” Dr. Ashish Jha, the White House’s COVID-19 coordinator, said during a recent discussion with the Philadelphia Inquirer.
Boom.
Naturally, your quote is out of context (and was also criticized as political cynicism). He's comparing mask effectiveness vs. indoor air quality. "That well" refers to 80% effectiveness.
All I had to do was google mask effectiveness to find a plethora of randomized studies.
But say masks are ineffective. At worst, we tried a reasonable commonsense hygiene measure for an airborne disease before we knew everything about it.
What did you people do to help mitigate the spread of a deadly contagion? Was it nothing? Was it worse than nothing? Was it whine about the minor inconveniences the contagion meant for you, years after they were moot, and stop there?
You found a plethora....but linked to none.
Weird.
Gotta love the doublespeak:
"we tried a reasonable commonsense hygiene..."
sounds exactly like:
Common sense gun safety laws
transgender affirming care
Fortify our democracy
It's propaganda. We know it and you know it
So what's your commonsense reaction to a deadly airborne disease? Cough on the nearest senior citizen?
"So what’s your commonsense reaction to a deadly airborne disease?..."
So what's with your inability to stay on subject, shit-stain?
50 states did non-randomized control studies on hundreds of millions of people. The mask mandates had no significant impact.
I guess if you like being told what to do.
All you have to do is rely on the CDC:
pre-pandemic CDC web site, about the 'real flu'.
"If you are sick," the CDC says, "you should wear a facemask when you are around other people (e.g., sharing a room or vehicle) and before you enter a healthcare provider's office." But "if you are NOT sick," it adds, "you do not need to wear a facemask unless you are caring for someone who is sick (and they are not able to wear a facemask).
If you want actual Communist Chinese Virus advice from the "private" sector, go with the New England Journal of Medicine (5/21/2020):
"We know that wearing a mask outside health care facilities offers little, if any, protection from infection. Public health authorities define a significant exposure to Covid-19 as face-to-face contact within 6 feet with a patient with symptomatic Covid-19 that is sustained for at least a few minutes (and some say more than 10 minutes or even 30 minutes). The chance of catching Covid-19 from a passing interaction in a public space is therefore minimal. In many cases, the desire for widespread masking is a reflexive reaction to anxiety over the pandemic."
What about the "misinformation" now Reason? Huh? MAGA, democracy, safety. Bleat like sheep.
You lost the debate. Get over it and move on. It's not dignified.
There is no debate. There is you believing whatever you want to believe, assiduously avoiding Googling even single iota of the claims you're making.
You’re right, there is no debate you science denying authoritarian shit.
Human Freedom Index? Another arbitrary scale like the "Doomsday Clock?
Behold the field in which I grow my fucks...
The inescapable fact is a ratchet only turns one way. Until we can find a way to force people to be free, tyrants will continue to make gain after gain.
And your beloved corporations worked hand-in-glove with governments around the world to make sure all restrictions were maintained, and that any dissenting views were quashed before they had a chance to see the light of day.
Yay freedumb!
Why did corporations want major disruptions to their workforce and production flow? If anything, corporate pressure was behind much of the virus denialism that stood in for a coherent policy platform on the right.
Even today they're trying to claw back from Covid-era changes to both the workplace and worker attitudes.
And I hope every corporation that raped their employees over COVID dies a slow, painful death.
Of course you're conveniently excising all the slow, painful deaths due to Covid that, you'd think, would be part of the equation here.
How many deaths? Are you sure they ALL were covid? Traffic accidents, heart attacks, and old age were all written up as a covid death. Follow the fucking money moron.
What's the number it has to be before you're morally justified in being a disease-spreading freak?
Healthy people aren’t disease spreading freaks…
You might have a point if they worried about the flu, or any other communicable disease, in the same manner over the last 20 years.
We certainly did worry about flu, in much the same manner, when it was killing tens of millions all over the world 100 years ago. They wore masks and quarantined to such an extent that it changed the course of human society.
How do you think history remembers people whose biggest complaint when that was happening that they had to alter their hygiene practices a little? I suppose it doesn't remember them, or their incredibly petty hypothetical grievances, much at all.
Now there's a flu vaccine every year and every responsible person gets it.
We certainly did worry about flu, in much the same manner, when it was killing tens of millions all over the world 100 years ago.
He said last 20 years. Also, 1918 was more than a century ago. Those goalposts are light.
They wore masks and quarantined to such an extent that it changed the course of human society.
Yes. Progressives did not waste that
crisisopportunity.I suppose it doesn’t remember them, or their incredibly petty hypothetical grievances, much at all.
Then why care? Let them be forgotten. You're the one stirring the pot.
Now there’s a flu vaccine every year and every responsible person gets it.
Every year they take their best guess and make a vaccine against three strains. When they get it right then yay. When they don't then it's useless. The success rate isn't high.
So getting the flu vaccine is more like gambling than being responsible. If you're high risk then it makes sense. Otherwise, fuck it.
Sigh. What terrible affliction comes from the flu vaccine?
What is it with vaccines and hysteria? Do you have any idea the sort of toxic crap Americans put into their bodies at every meal?
"...What is it with vaccines and hysteria?..."
What is it with left-wing shit-bags and a lack of honesty?
Every? No, we don't.
Staying home when you’re sick makes you responsible.
Getting the flu shot (with a crapshoot chance on if it will protect against the dominant strain that year), not so much.
While the world's political leaders have long been tightening the screws on their suffering populations, COVID-19 gave too many of them an excuse to accelerate the process.
None of that would have mattered if people themselves:
believe personal liberty is something that truly matters
believe government is something that is primarily responsible for and limited to preserving/enhancing personal liberty
structured government to ensure the above can happen through separation of powers, checks and balances, etc
pay attention on a regular - nay continuous - basis to ensure that government is accountable for the above.
I'm sick of this fatalistic modern libertarian/anarchist bullshit of blaming government rather than looking in the mirror.
"None of that would have mattered if people themselves:,..."
Hadn't listened to PANIKED chicken littles like you, steaming pile of shit.
Fuck off and die.
I didn't sell out, son, I bought in!
Reason was a fervent supporter of lockdowns, masks, vaccines mandates and “following the science”. You don’t get a do over. GFY.
RE: crippled liberty
>>>>
I'll go with the folks who tried to STEAL our Republic
the GQP failed insurrectionists.
I nominate "crippled liberty" for a band name.
"I’ll go with the folks who tried to STEAL our Republic
the GQP failed insurrectionists."
Sarc or the abysmal stupidity of a TDS-addled pile of shit?
The Floyd rioters, especially those at Capitol Hill Autonomous Zone, would like to have a word with you.
Reason Mag believes in the myth of the Left Libertarian. If you believe in equality, you don't believe in liberty. If you don't believe in private property, you don't believe in liberty.
If you believe that the fundamental unit of society is a group, and view yourself primarily as a member of a group, then you have more in common with Marx, Stalin, Mussolini and Hitler than with individualist libertarians.
If you believe the free choice is the most terrifying element of modern life, fear not. There are dozens of cults that will absorb you into their collective mind. Join one, and leave the rest of us alone.
I agree with J.D. TUCCILLE .. It would have been much better if 6 million more Americans had died.
That would have been even more fun to watch.
A ton of lockdowns throughout the world didn't prevent 6 million deaths. The economies on the other hand suffered tremendously.
You're gonna have to do better than this, VendicarD.
Had there been another 6 million in the NY assisted care system, Governor Cuomo (D) may have been up to the task.
Better luck on the next one, you ghoulish piece of shit.
You don't say.
Oh my goodness is everyone all right? Apparently we have survived the comments are down crisis. Unless….there was a culling? Nah, unherd off. Still, roll call please!
(Sorry, I have to do this on every article from today. Just to be safe—-oh and sustainable—oh yeah and equity.
I am making a good salary from home $6580-$7065/week , which is amazing under a year ago I was jobless in a horrible economy. I thank God every day I was blessed with these instructions and now it’s my duty to pay it forward and share it with Everyone,
🙂 AND GOOD LUCK.:)
Here is I started.……......>> http://WWW.SALARYBEZ.COM